NRC-97-0002, Submits Rev to 960621 Amend Request to Include Check of Aac Source When Action Statement for EDG TS 3.8.1.1 Is Entered: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot insert)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 15: Line 15:
| document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, INCOMING CORRESPONDENCE
| document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, INCOMING CORRESPONDENCE
| page count = 3
| page count = 3
| project = TAC:M94171
| stage = Other
}}
}}



Latest revision as of 18:04, 14 December 2021

Submits Rev to 960621 Amend Request to Include Check of Aac Source When Action Statement for EDG TS 3.8.1.1 Is Entered
ML20134F000
Person / Time
Site: Fermi DTE Energy icon.png
Issue date: 01/30/1997
From: Gipson D
DETROIT EDISON CO.
To:
NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
Shared Package
ML20134F004 List:
References
CON-NRC-97-0002, CON-NRC-97-2 TAC-M94171, NUDOCS 9702070201
Download: ML20134F000 (3)


Text

e-T.-

Dougtse FL Cipeon Senior V.ce President

  • Nuclear Generaton Ferma 2 6400 North Dixie Highway Newport. %ch'0an 48166 (313) 586-5249 January 30,1997  ;

NRC-97-0002 l U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control Desk Washington, D. C. 20555

References:

.1) Fermi 2 NRC Docket No. 50-341 NRC License No. NPF-43

2) Detroit Edison Letter to NRC," Proposed Technical Specification Change (License Amendment)- Emergency Diesel Generator Action Statements, Surveillance Requirements and Reports," NRC-95-0124, dated November 22,1995
3) Detroit Edison Letter to NRC," Response to Questions on Proposed Emergency Diesel Generator Technical Specification Change," NRC-964)008, dated February 19,1996
4) Detroit Edison Letter to NRC," Response to NRC letter on Emergency Diesel Generator Allowed Outage Time Extension (TAC No. M94171)," NRC-96-0041, dated April 19,1996
5) Detroit Edison Letter to NRC," Response to Probabilistic Safety 1 Assessment Questions Related to Request for Increasing ,

Emergency Diesel Generator Allowed Out of Service Time -l (TAC No. M94171)," NRC-96-0050, dated May 3,1996

6) Detroit Edison Letter to NRC," Response to Questions on Combustion Turbine Generator (CTG) 11 Unit Number 1 j Reliability and System Refurbishment (TAC No. M94171),"

NRC-96-0066, dated June 12,1996 070031 ACol ',

9702070201 970130 "

PDR ADOCK 05000341 P PDR w a

1 .

' 1 USNRC '

NRC-97-0002 Page 2 1

1

7) Detroit Edison Letter to NRC," Revised Proposed Technical Specification Change (License Amendment)- Emergency Diesel Generator Action Statements, Surveillance Requirements and Reports (TAC No. M94171)," .NRC-96-0069, dated June 21, 1996
8) NRC Letter to Detroit Edison," Request for Additional Information Related to the Amendment to Extend Emergency Diesel Generator Allowed Outage Times at Fermi 2 (TAC No.

M94171)," dated November 5,1996

9) Detroit Edison Letter to NRC," Additional Information Related to the License Amendment to Extend Emergency Diesel Generator Allowed Outage Times at Fermi 2 (TAC No.

M94171)," NRC-96-0133, dated December 4,1996

Subject:

Combustion Turbine Generator (CTG) I l-1 Revised License l Amendment to Extend Emergency Diesel Generator Allowed Outage Times at Fermi 2 (TAC No. 94171)

On November 22,1995, Detroit Edison submitted Reference 2 which proposed to amend Operating License NPF-43 for the Fermi 2 plant. Specifically,it was proposed to change the allowed out-of-service time (AOT) for one onsite AC electrical power division from the current 72 hours8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br /> to 7 days. Refe> ence 2 also included changes to incorporate improvements described in Generic Letter (GL) 94-01 which were subsequently issued as Amendment 107. As a result of discussions with the Fermi 2 NRR Project Manager Reference 2 is being revised by this submittal as described below.

In References 3 through 6, and most recently in Reference 9, Detroit Edison responded to a number of questions from the NRC staff concerning this amendment request.

Also,in responding to these questions Detroit Edison committed in Reference 4 to verify by an administrative check that the Alternate AC source (AAC) would be functional before removing an EDG from service for a planned extended period. The NRC subsequently requested that this commitment be included in the proposed Technical Specifications (TS). This letter, therefore, revises the original amendment request to include a check of the AAC source when the Action Statement for EDG TS 3.8.1.1 is entered.

In Reference 7, Detroit Edison modified the original request by revising the proposed Action Statements for TS 3.8.1.1. That submittal also deleted references to

];

USNRC NRC-97-0002 l Page 3 I evaluations that were performed using the Fermi 2 Probabalistic Safety Assessment l (PS A) model. These changes were made in order to permit the NRC review to  ;

continue without relying on the PS A results which Detroit Edison did not consider

)

essential tojustify the requested changes. Detroit Edison now understt ads, however,  ;

that the NRC is proceeding with the review of the original request. The submittal l made by Reference 7 therefore is being withdrawn by this letter and should no longer  !

be considered in the review of this amendment request.

The final change being made by this letter is to modify the EDG Action Statements j proposed by Reference 2 to make the extension of the AOT from 72 hours8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br /> to 7 days j contingent on the operability of CTG 11-1 as requested by the NRC staff. If j CTG 11-1 is not operable, the AOT would revert back to 72 hours8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br /> consistent with )

the current Technical Specifications, i Detroit Edison has evaluated the changes proposed by this submittal and has

' determined that the Significant Hazards evaluation provided with Reference 2 does not require revision. The determination that the proposed changes involve No Significant Hazards Consideration is not affected because the changes made by this submittal provide even further assurance that CTG 11-1 would be operable during the time that an EDG is out of service for extended maintenance. The risk as discussed in Reference 2, therefore, would be reduced.

Attachment I contains the proposed Technical Specification page revisions. These page revisions reflect the changes to TS 3.8.1.1 described above and corresponding changes to the Bases. The Fermi 2 Onsite Review Organization has approved and the Nuclear Safety Review Group has reviewed the proposed Technical Specifications and concurs with the changes made by this submittal.

If there are any questions concerning this submittal please contact Robert A. Newkirk at (313) 586-4211.

Sincerely, i

I Attachment cc: A. B. Beach j M. J. Jordan I A. J. Kugler  !

A. Vegel l