ML100640737: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
Line 18: Line 18:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:Accession No. ML100640737  
{{#Wiki_filter:Accession No. ML100640737 From:                       Tam, Peter Sent:                       Friday, March 05, 2010 1:54 PM To:                         'Jack Gadzala'; 'Craig D Sly'; 'Thomas L Breene' Cc:                         McMurtray, Anthony; Farnan, Michael
 
From: Tam, Peter Sent: Friday, March 05, 2010 1:54 PM To: 'Jack Gadzala'; 'Craig D Sly'; 'Thomas L Breene' Cc: McMurtray, Anthony; Farnan, Michael  


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Kewaunee - Relief Request VRR-05, Revision 1, Needs to be Supplemented (TAC ME3352)
Kewaunee - Relief Request VRR-05, Revision 1, Needs to be Supplemented (TAC ME3352)
Jack: Relief Request VRR-05, Revision 0, was initially submitted on 1/23/2006 and approved on 3/24/2006, and supplemented with clarifications on 4/20/2006. The authorized alternative approved performing position verification test on valves SI-350A and SI-350B at an interval of 36 months rather than the prescribed 24 months of ISTC-3700. The approved VRR-05, Revision 0, stated that the enclosures require leak testing after completion of position verification test. In addition, the valves will be leakage tested on a refueling outage frequency to ensure valve closure. Revision 1, removes the statement of leakage testing the valves on a refueling outage frequency and replaces the statement with a commitment to leakage test to verify closure to be completed during those refueling outages where local position indication verification is not performed.  
Jack:
 
Relief Request VRR-05, Revision 0, was initially submitted on 1/23/2006 and approved on 3/24/2006, and supplemented with clarifications on 4/20/2006. The authorized alternative approved performing position verification test on valves SI-350A and SI-350B at an interval of 36 months rather than the prescribed 24 months of ISTC-3700. The approved VRR-05, Revision 0, stated that the enclosures require leak testing after completion of position verification test. In addition, the valves will be leakage tested on a refueling outage frequency to ensure valve closure. Revision 1, removes the statement of leakage testing the valves on a refueling outage frequency and replaces the statement with a commitment to leakage test to verify closure to be completed during those refueling outages where local position indication verification is not performed.
(1) How does this request impact the Kewaunee Appendix J program?
(1) How does this request impact the Kewaunee Appendix J program?
(2) Is the leak test separate from Appendix J test (i.e. does it have different acceptance criteria)?  
(2) Is the leak test separate from Appendix J test (i.e. does it have different acceptance criteria)?
 
(3) What is the make and model of the valve? Is the enclosure separate from the valve such that disassembly does not affect valve performance?
(3) What is the make and model of the valve? Is the enclosure separate from the valve such that disassembly does not affect valve performance?
(4) If disassembly of the enclosure does affect valve performance, how is the requirement of ISTC-3310 met?
(4) If disassembly of the enclosure does affect valve performance, how is the requirement of ISTC-3310 met?  
We need to discuss, in a conference call, the above questions with our reviewer Michael Farnan. This call needs to occur in a rather tight schedule because we are in the acceptance review stage and are subject to the schedular guidance of NRR Office Instruction LIC-109. The sole purpose of this e-mail is to prepare you and others for the requested conference call. This e-mail does not formally request for information, and does not formally convey an NRC staff position.
 
Peter S. Tam Senior Project Manager (for Kewaunee and Monticello)
We need to discuss, in a conference call, the above questions with our reviewer Michael Farnan. This call needs to occur in a rather tight schedule because we are in the acceptance review stage and are subject to the schedular guidance of NRR Office Instruction LIC-109. The sole purpose of this e-mail is to prepare you and others for the requested conference call. This e-mail does not formally request for information, and does not formally convey an NRC staff position. Peter S. Tam Senior Project Manager (for Kewaunee and Monticello) Plant Licensing Branch III-1 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Tel. 301-415-1451  
Plant Licensing Branch III-1 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Tel. 301-415-1451


E-mail Properties Mail Envelope Properties ()  
E-mail Properties Mail Envelope Properties ()


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Kewaunee - Relief Request VRR-05, Revision 1, Needs to be Supplemented (TAC ME3352)
Kewaunee - Relief Request VRR-05, Revision 1, Needs to be Supplemented (TAC ME3352)
Sent Date:       03/05/2010 1:36:29 PM Received Date:        03/05/2010 1:53:00 PM From:               Tam, Peter  
Sent Date:       03/05/2010 1:36:29 PM Received Date:        03/05/2010 1:53:00 PM From:             Tam, Peter Created By:        Peter.Tam@nrc.gov Recipients:
 
Created By:        Peter.Tam@nrc.gov  
 
Recipients:
jack.gadzala@dom.com ('Jack Gadzala')
jack.gadzala@dom.com ('Jack Gadzala')
Tracking Status: None craig.d.sly@dom.com ('Craig D Sly')
Tracking Status: None craig.d.sly@dom.com ('Craig D Sly')
Tracking Status: None thomas.l.breene@dom.com ('Thomas L Breene')
Tracking Status: None thomas.l.breene@dom.com ('Thomas L Breene')
Tracking Status: None Anthony.McMurtray@nrc.gov (McMurtray, Anthony)
Tracking Status: None Anthony.McMurtray@nrc.gov (McMurtray, Anthony)
Tracking Status: None  
Tracking Status: None Michael.Farnan@nrc.gov (Farnan, Michael)
 
Tracking Status: None Post Office:
Michael.Farnan@nrc.gov (Farnan, Michael)                 Tracking Status: None  
Files           Size     Date & Time MESSAGE           19938     03/05/2010 Options Expiration Date:
 
Priority:                 olImportanceNormal ReplyRequested:         False Return Notification:        False Sensitivity:       olNormal Recipients received:}}
Post Office:  
 
Files               Size       Date & Time  
 
MESSAGE       19938       03/05/2010  
 
Options Expiration Date:
Priority:                       olImportanceNormal ReplyRequested:       False Return Notification:        False  
 
Sensitivity:         olNormal Recipients received:}}

Latest revision as of 22:10, 13 November 2019

Relief Request VRR-05, Rev. 1, Needs to Be Supplemented
ML100640737
Person / Time
Site: Kewaunee Dominion icon.png
Issue date: 03/05/2010
From: Tam P
Plant Licensing Branch III
To: Breene T, Gadzala J, Sly C
Dominion Energy Kewaunee
Tam P
References
TAC ME3352
Download: ML100640737 (2)
v • d • e


Text

Accession No. ML100640737 From: Tam, Peter Sent: Friday, March 05, 2010 1:54 PM To: 'Jack Gadzala'; 'Craig D Sly'; 'Thomas L Breene' Cc: McMurtray, Anthony; Farnan, Michael

Subject:

Kewaunee - Relief Request VRR-05, Revision 1, Needs to be Supplemented (TAC ME3352)

Jack:

Relief Request VRR-05, Revision 0, was initially submitted on 1/23/2006 and approved on 3/24/2006, and supplemented with clarifications on 4/20/2006. The authorized alternative approved performing position verification test on valves SI-350A and SI-350B at an interval of 36 months rather than the prescribed 24 months of ISTC-3700. The approved VRR-05, Revision 0, stated that the enclosures require leak testing after completion of position verification test. In addition, the valves will be leakage tested on a refueling outage frequency to ensure valve closure. Revision 1, removes the statement of leakage testing the valves on a refueling outage frequency and replaces the statement with a commitment to leakage test to verify closure to be completed during those refueling outages where local position indication verification is not performed.

(1) How does this request impact the Kewaunee Appendix J program?

(2) Is the leak test separate from Appendix J test (i.e. does it have different acceptance criteria)?

(3) What is the make and model of the valve? Is the enclosure separate from the valve such that disassembly does not affect valve performance?

(4) If disassembly of the enclosure does affect valve performance, how is the requirement of ISTC-3310 met?

We need to discuss, in a conference call, the above questions with our reviewer Michael Farnan. This call needs to occur in a rather tight schedule because we are in the acceptance review stage and are subject to the schedular guidance of NRR Office Instruction LIC-109. The sole purpose of this e-mail is to prepare you and others for the requested conference call. This e-mail does not formally request for information, and does not formally convey an NRC staff position.

Peter S. Tam Senior Project Manager (for Kewaunee and Monticello)

Plant Licensing Branch III-1 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Tel. 301-415-1451

E-mail Properties Mail Envelope Properties ()

Subject:

Kewaunee - Relief Request VRR-05, Revision 1, Needs to be Supplemented (TAC ME3352)

Sent Date: 03/05/2010 1:36:29 PM Received Date: 03/05/2010 1:53:00 PM From: Tam, Peter Created By: Peter.Tam@nrc.gov Recipients:

jack.gadzala@dom.com ('Jack Gadzala')

Tracking Status: None craig.d.sly@dom.com ('Craig D Sly')

Tracking Status: None thomas.l.breene@dom.com ('Thomas L Breene')

Tracking Status: None Anthony.McMurtray@nrc.gov (McMurtray, Anthony)

Tracking Status: None Michael.Farnan@nrc.gov (Farnan, Michael)

Tracking Status: None Post Office:

Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 19938 03/05/2010 Options Expiration Date:

Priority: olImportanceNormal ReplyRequested: False Return Notification: False Sensitivity: olNormal Recipients received:

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML100640737&oldid=2136265"