ML12019A266: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 5: Line 5:
| author name = Saporito T
| author name = Saporito T
| author affiliation = Saporito Energy Consultants
| author affiliation = Saporito Energy Consultants
| addressee name = Saba F E
| addressee name = Saba F
| addressee affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL
| addressee affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL
| docket = 05000302
| docket = 05000302

Revision as of 05:26, 29 June 2019

Enforcement Petition 10 C.F.R. 2.206
ML12019A266
Person / Time
Site: Crystal River Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 01/17/2012
From: Saporito T
Saporito Energy Consultants
To: Farideh Saba
Division of Operating Reactor Licensing
References
Download: ML12019A266 (6)


Text

1 NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From: Thomas Saporito [saprodani@gmail.com]

Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2012 1:53 PM To: Saba, Farideh Cc: Saprodani Associates; Broaddus, Doug; Mensah, Tanya; Russell, Andrea; Clark, Michael; Jaczko, Gregory; DeMiranda, Oscar

Subject:

Re: Crystal River Nuclear Plant - Enforcement Petition 10 C.F.R. 2.206 Attachments:

ATT00002.png Follow Up Flag:

Follow up Flag Status:

Flagged

Dear Ms. Saba:

Yes, after the conclusion of the public hearing I will be able to supplement (in writing) my enforcement petition. To the extent that the new information will be voluminous and most relevant - I request an additional opportunity to meet with the NRC PRB to more fully explain the relevance and importance of the new information. Please arrange for me to speak with the NRC PRB via teleconference ca ll after the NRC receives the addition information.

Kind regards, Thomas Saporito Senior Consultant

On 1/17/2012 1:47 PM, Saba , Farideh wrote:

Dear Mr. Saporito

This is regarding your email below dated January 13, 2012 to the NRC, Executive Director of Operations. In your email you have requested to further supplement your petition ag ainst Progress Energy Corporat ion at Crystal River Unit 3 Nuclear Generating Plant dated December 5, 2009. In your email, you have requested 'to suppleme nt that Enforcement Petition [December 5, 2009, petition] with "expert" testimony which will be obtained this summer via a public hearing before the Florida Public Service Commission.' In accordance with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)

Management Directive (MD) 8.11, the petitioner should submit supplemental information to the NRC in writing and discuss how the supplemental information (e.g., specific facts provided through expert testimony in your email) supports the original petition request.

Once you submit your supplement to the NRC, the Petition Review Board for your original petition will review the supplement and process it in accordance with the guidance in MD 8.11, Supplements to the Petition.

Please let me know if I can be of any further assistance to you.

Best regards, Farideh E. Saba, P.E.

Senior Project Manager NRC/ADRO/NRR/DORL 301-415-1447 Mail Stop O-8G9A Farideh.Saba@NRC.GOV From: saporito3@gmail.com

[mailto:saporito3@gmail.com

] On Behalf Of Saprodani Associates Sent: Friday, January 13, 2012 6:42 AM 2 To: NRCExecSec Resource Cc: Jaczko, Gregory; DeMiranda, Oscar

Subject:

Crystal River Nuclear Plant - Enforcement Petition 10 C.F.R. 2.206 For the Executive Director - U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)

The NRC is currently investigating an Enforcement Petition filed under 10 C.F.R. 2.206 which I submitted in connection with the Crystal River Nucl ear Plant (CR-3) related to the delamination event(s) in the containment building structure. At this time, I request to supplement that Enforcement Petition with "expert" testimony which will be obtained this summer via a public hearing before the Florida Public Service Commission. Please see the news article shown below.

3 4==================

======

==

In addition, I request that the NRC O ffice of Investigations and Enforcement - monitor the testimony given at the upcoming public hearings in Florida to ascertain whether one or more licens ee officials intentionally mislead the NRC in connection with the "root" cause and repair activities of the CR-3 facility - in an effort to gain restart authorization from the agency.

Kind regards,

______________________________

Thomas Saporito, Senior Consultant Saprodani Associates , 177 US HWY 1 Unit 212 , Tequesta, Florida 33469 Phone:1-561-972-8363 Skype:saporito3 Advocate of Greenpeace USA http://saprodani.blogspot.com/

-- Thomas Saporito, Senior Consultant

Saprodani Associates, 177 US HWY 1

Unit 212, Tequesta, Florida 33469

Phone:1-561-972-8363 Skype:saporito3 Advocate of Greenpeace USA http://saprodani.blogspot.com/

Hearing Identifier: NRR_PMDA Email Number: 236 Mail Envelope Properties (4F15C379.9050604)

Subject:

Re: Crystal River Nuclear Plant - Enforcement Petition 10 C.F.R. 2.206 Sent Date: 1/17/2012 1:52:41 PM Received Date: 1/17/2012 1:52:52 PM From: Thomas Saporito Created By: saprodani@gmail.com Recipients: "Saprodani Associates" <saprodani@gmail.com>

Tracking Status: None "Broaddus, Doug" <Doug.Broaddus@nrc.gov>

Tracking Status: None "Mensah, Tanya" <Tanya.Mensah@nrc.gov> Tracking Status: None "Russell, Andrea" <Andrea.Russell@nrc.gov> Tracking Status: None "Clark, Michael" <Michael.Clark@nrc.gov>

Tracking Status: None "Jaczko, Gregory" <Gregory.Jaczko@nrc.gov> Tracking Status: None "DeMiranda, Oscar" <Oscar.DeMiranda@nrc.gov> Tracking Status: None "Saba, Farideh" <Farideh.Saba@nrc.gov>

Tracking Status: None Post Office: gmail.com Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 3707 1/17/2012 1:52:52 PM ATT00002.png 72122 Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date: Recipients Received: Follow up

Pa ge 1of 1 1/19/2012file://c:\EMailCa pture\NRR_PMDA\236\attch1.

p n g