ML090790322: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
| number = ML090790322
| number = ML090790322
| issue date = 02/06/2009
| issue date = 02/06/2009
| title = Diablo Canyon-2009-02-Draft Outline Comments
| title = 2009-02-Draft Outline Comments
| author name = Larson B T
| author name = Larson B
| author affiliation = NRC/RGN-IV/DRS/OB
| author affiliation = NRC/RGN-IV/DRS/OB
| addressee name =  
| addressee name =  
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:Attachment 6 OBDI 202 - IOLE Process DRAFT OUTLINE COMMENTS Rev 0 Facility:
{{#Wiki_filter:DRAFT OUTLINE COMMENTS Rev 0 Facility:     DC                                   First Exam Date:       02/06/2009 Written Exam Outline (12/9/2008)
DC First Exam Date:
Comment                                     Resolution 1   Put revision number on all forms.         Will do.
02/06/2009 Written Exam Outline (12/9/2008)
Two KA repeat on SRO exam from last 2    None.
Comment Resolution 1 Put revision number on all forms.
2 NRC exams (T2/G1-007)
Will do. 2 Two KA repeat on SRO exam from last 2 NRC exams (T2/G1-007)
Five KA repeats on RO exam from last 2   Only one question is repeated from past 2 3  NRC exams - Note that limit is 4 repeat   NRC exams.
None. 3 Five KA repeats on RO exam from last 2 NRC exams - Note that limit is 4 repeat  
questions.
 
4   List of suppressed KAs?                   Sent via email.
questions. Only one question is repeated from past 2 NRC exams.
If questions are repeated from previous   Done. No issues identified.
4 List of suppressed KAs?
2 NRC exams, review post-exam 5
Sent via email.
analysis to determine quality of questions.
5 If questions are repeated from previous 2 NRC exams, review post-exam analysis to determine quality of  
 
questions. Done. No issues identified.
 
Administrative JPM Outline (12/9/2008)
Administrative JPM Outline (12/9/2008)
Comment Resolution 1 Use "A" designators (A1, A2, etc)
Comment                                     Resolution 1   Use A designators (A1, A2, etc)         Will do.
Will do. 2 Put revision number on all forms.
2   Put revision number on all forms.         Will do.
Will do. 3 Provide ES-301-1 for Audit exam Will do.
3   Provide ES-301-1 for Audit exam           Will do.                                                     OBDI 202 - IOLE Process
Attachment 6 OBDI 202 - IOLE Process Control Room / In-Plant System JPM Outline (12/9/2008)
Comment Resolution 1 Draft exam submittal for Modified JPMs must include a copy of the parent JPM. Will send via email.
2 What are the "LJC-XXX" and "LJP-XXX"
 
designators? LJC - License JPM Control Room LJP - License JPM Plant 3 Provide ES-301-2 for Audit exam Will do. 4 Put revision number on all forms.
Will do. 5 S2 - what is PT-456?
PZR pressure transmitter
 
Simulator Scenario Outline Comments (12/9/2008)
Comment Resolution 1 Was facility-specific or industry-generic
 
operating experience used in development of the scenarios?
Yes. Hi swell, FCV-540 failure.
2 Was PRA used to identify risk-important
 
operator actions?
Yes. 3 2 scenarios are MOL, 1 is BOL, and 1 doesn't identify core life. Does training include differences? Yes. No simulator issues anticipated.
4 Provide ES-D-1's for Audit exam.
Will do. 5 Will identify B/U scenario during validation. Change name of B/U to Scenario 4.
Done. 6 For each scenario, complete Target Quantitative Attributes from ES-301-4 and include on D-1's.
Will do. 7 In Event column of D-1's, identify applicant position (i.e. R-ATC, N-SRO, BOP) Will do. 8 On Scenario Narrative - replace A, B, C with 1, 2, 3.
Will do. 9 Precursors to events don't count as events (Scenario 1, Events 5/6). Each event must have verifiable actions.
Noted. 10 Scenario 2, Event 1 - move this event to Event 4 (in case the applicants are too slow to prevent reactor trip)
Will do.
Attachment 6 OBDI 202 - IOLE Process 11 Scenario 2, Event 3 - actually 2 events (PZR level channel fails - I for SRO and
 
ATC. Restore letdown is N for SRO and BOP). Okay. 12 Scenario 3, Event 2 - D-1 says 900 MW, narrative says 800 MW.
Fixed. 900 MW is correct.
13 Scenario 3, Event 3: D-1 says NI-44 fails
 
high, narrative says Tc RTD fails hi Fixed. D-1 is correct.
14 Scenario 4, Event 5 - initiate steam leak as small, then ramp up slowly.
Will implement a 5 min ramp and test during
 
validation.
15 Scenario 4, Event 3 - is this 2 events?
No. 16 Scenario 4, Event 7 - how is this CT? Do all Train B components align


properly?
Control Room / In-Plant System JPM Outline (12/9/2008)
Not a CT. Fixed.
Comment                                      Resolution Draft exam submittal for Modified JPMs    Will send via email.
17 If Scenarios 2 and 4 are selected for the exam, ensure different applicants restore
1 must include a copy of the parent JPM.
What are the LJC-XXX and LJP-XXX      LJC - License JPM Control Room 2
designators?                               LJP - License JPM Plant 3  Provide ES-301-2 for Audit exam            Will do.
4  Put revision number on all forms.          Will do.
5  S2 - what is PT-456?                      PZR pressure transmitter Simulator Scenario Outline Comments (12/9/2008)
Comment                                      Resolution Was facility-specific or industry-generic  Yes. Hi swell, FCV-540 failure.
1 operating experience used in development of the scenarios?
Was PRA used to identify risk-important    Yes.
2 operator actions?
2 scenarios are MOL, 1 is BOL, and 1      Yes. No simulator issues anticipated.
3 doesnt identify core life. Does training include differences?
4 Provide ES-D-1s for Audit exam.            Will do.
Will identify B/U scenario during          Done.
5 validation. Change name of B/U to Scenario 4.
For each scenario, complete Target        Will do.
6 Quantitative Attributes from ES-301-4 and include on D-1s.
In Event column of D-1s, identify        Will do.
7 applicant position (i.e. R-ATC, N-SRO, BOP)
On Scenario Narrative - replace A, B, C    Will do.
8 with 1, 2, 3.
Precursors to events dont count as        Noted.
9 events (Scenario 1, Events 5/6). Each event must have verifiable actions.
Scenario 2, Event 1 - move this event to  Will do.
10 Event 4 (in case the applicants are too slow to prevent reactor trip)                                                        OBDI 202 - IOLE Process


letdown. Will do once exam scenarios are identified.
Scenario 2, Event 3 - actually 2 events  Okay.
18 When preparing Draft Op Test, identify all Tech Specs and action statement(s) in the D-2 for each TS call.
(PZR level channel fails - I for SRO and 11 ATC. Restore letdown is N for SRO and BOP).
N/A 19 When preparing Draft Op Test, Critical Tasks must be carefully defined, including time limits where applicable.
Scenario 3, Event 2 - D-1 says 900 MW,    Fixed. 900 MW is correct.
N/A 20 When preparing Draft Op Test, identify all procedure transitions in the D-2's.
12 narrative says 800 MW.
N/A}}
Scenario 3, Event 3: D-1 says NI-44 fails Fixed. D-1 is correct.
13 high, narrative says Tc RTD fails hi Scenario 4, Event 5 - initiate steam leak Will implement a 5 min ramp and test during 14 as small, then ramp up slowly.            validation.
15  Scenario 4, Event 3 - is this 2 events?  No.
Scenario 4, Event 7 - how is this CT?    Not a CT. Fixed.
16  Do all Train B components align properly?
If Scenarios 2 and 4 are selected for the Will do once exam scenarios are identified.
17  exam, ensure different applicants restore letdown.
When preparing Draft Op Test, identify   N/A 18  all Tech Specs and action statement(s) in the D-2 for each TS call.
When preparing Draft Op Test, Critical   N/A 19  Tasks must be carefully defined, including time limits where applicable.
When preparing Draft Op Test, identify   N/A 20 all procedure transitions in the D-2s.                                                       OBDI 202 - IOLE Process}}

Latest revision as of 08:55, 14 November 2019

2009-02-Draft Outline Comments
ML090790322
Person / Time
Site: Diablo Canyon  Pacific Gas & Electric icon.png
Issue date: 02/06/2009
From: Brian Larson
Operations Branch IV
To:
Pacific Gas & Electric Co
References
50-275/09-301, 50-323/09-301
Download: ML090790322 (3)
v • d • e


Text

DRAFT OUTLINE COMMENTS Rev 0 Facility: DC First Exam Date: 02/06/2009 Written Exam Outline (12/9/2008)

Comment Resolution 1 Put revision number on all forms. Will do.

Two KA repeat on SRO exam from last 2 None.

2 NRC exams (T2/G1-007)

Five KA repeats on RO exam from last 2 Only one question is repeated from past 2 3 NRC exams - Note that limit is 4 repeat NRC exams.

questions.

4 List of suppressed KAs? Sent via email.

If questions are repeated from previous Done. No issues identified.

2 NRC exams, review post-exam 5

analysis to determine quality of questions.

Administrative JPM Outline (12/9/2008)

Comment Resolution 1 Use A designators (A1, A2, etc) Will do.

2 Put revision number on all forms. Will do.

3 Provide ES-301-1 for Audit exam Will do. OBDI 202 - IOLE Process

Control Room / In-Plant System JPM Outline (12/9/2008)

Comment Resolution Draft exam submittal for Modified JPMs Will send via email.

1 must include a copy of the parent JPM.

What are the LJC-XXX and LJP-XXX LJC - License JPM Control Room 2

designators? LJP - License JPM Plant 3 Provide ES-301-2 for Audit exam Will do.

4 Put revision number on all forms. Will do.

5 S2 - what is PT-456? PZR pressure transmitter Simulator Scenario Outline Comments (12/9/2008)

Comment Resolution Was facility-specific or industry-generic Yes. Hi swell, FCV-540 failure.

1 operating experience used in development of the scenarios?

Was PRA used to identify risk-important Yes.

2 operator actions?

2 scenarios are MOL, 1 is BOL, and 1 Yes. No simulator issues anticipated.

3 doesnt identify core life. Does training include differences?

4 Provide ES-D-1s for Audit exam. Will do.

Will identify B/U scenario during Done.

5 validation. Change name of B/U to Scenario 4.

For each scenario, complete Target Will do.

6 Quantitative Attributes from ES-301-4 and include on D-1s.

In Event column of D-1s, identify Will do.

7 applicant position (i.e. R-ATC, N-SRO, BOP)

On Scenario Narrative - replace A, B, C Will do.

8 with 1, 2, 3.

Precursors to events dont count as Noted.

9 events (Scenario 1, Events 5/6). Each event must have verifiable actions.

Scenario 2, Event 1 - move this event to Will do.

10 Event 4 (in case the applicants are too slow to prevent reactor trip) OBDI 202 - IOLE Process

Scenario 2, Event 3 - actually 2 events Okay.

(PZR level channel fails - I for SRO and 11 ATC. Restore letdown is N for SRO and BOP).

Scenario 3, Event 2 - D-1 says 900 MW, Fixed. 900 MW is correct.

12 narrative says 800 MW.

Scenario 3, Event 3: D-1 says NI-44 fails Fixed. D-1 is correct.

13 high, narrative says Tc RTD fails hi Scenario 4, Event 5 - initiate steam leak Will implement a 5 min ramp and test during 14 as small, then ramp up slowly. validation.

15 Scenario 4, Event 3 - is this 2 events? No.

Scenario 4, Event 7 - how is this CT? Not a CT. Fixed.

16 Do all Train B components align properly?

If Scenarios 2 and 4 are selected for the Will do once exam scenarios are identified.

17 exam, ensure different applicants restore letdown.

When preparing Draft Op Test, identify N/A 18 all Tech Specs and action statement(s) in the D-2 for each TS call.

When preparing Draft Op Test, Critical N/A 19 Tasks must be carefully defined, including time limits where applicable.

When preparing Draft Op Test, identify N/A 20 all procedure transitions in the D-2s. OBDI 202 - IOLE Process

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML090790322&oldid=2147836"