ML17328A301: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
| issue date = 06/22/1990
| issue date = 06/22/1990
| title = LER 88-003-08:on 880111,repetitive Violation of ESF Instrumentation Limiting Condition for Operation Tolerances Occurred.Caused by Highly Restrictive Allowable Values. Calibr Frequencies Increased to monthly.W/900622 Ltr
| title = LER 88-003-08:on 880111,repetitive Violation of ESF Instrumentation Limiting Condition for Operation Tolerances Occurred.Caused by Highly Restrictive Allowable Values. Calibr Frequencies Increased to monthly.W/900622 Ltr
| author name = BEILMAN T P, BLIND A A
| author name = Beilman T, Blind A
| author affiliation = INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER CO. (FORMERLY INDIANA & MICHIG
| author affiliation = INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER CO. (FORMERLY INDIANA & MICHIG
| addressee name =  
| addressee name =  
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:ACCELERATED UTION DEMONS'ATION SYSTEM REGULATORY INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (RIDS)ACCESSION NBR:9007020032 DOC.DATE: 90/06/22 NOTARIZED:
{{#Wiki_filter:ACCELERATED                           UTION DEMONS'ATION                   SYSTEM REGULATORY INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (RIDS)
NO DOCKET FACIL:50-316 Donald C.Cook Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 2, Indiana&05000316 AUTH.NAME AUTHOR AFFILIATION BEILMAN,T.P.
ACCESSION NBR:9007020032             DOC.DATE: 90/06/22     NOTARIZED: NO           DOCKET FACIL:50-316 Donald C. Cook Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 2, Indiana                 & 05000316 AUTH. NAME           AUTHOR AFFILIATION BEILMAN,T.P.       Indiana Michigan Power         Co.   (formerly Indiana   & Michigan Ele BLIND,A.A.         Indiana Michigan Power         Co.   (formerly Indiana   & Michigan Ele RECIP.NAME           RECIPIENT AFFILIATION
Indiana Michigan Power Co.(formerly Indiana&Michigan Ele BLIND,A.A.
Indiana Michigan Power Co.(formerly Indiana&Michigan Ele RECIP.NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION


==SUBJECT:==
==SUBJECT:==
LER 88-003-08:on 880111,repetitive violation of ESF instrumentation LCO tolerances due to highly RA values.W/9 DISTRIBUTION CODE: IE22T COPIES RECEIVED:LTR ENCL SIZE: TITLE: 50.73/50.9 Licensee Event Report (LER), Incident Rpt, etc.NOTES: RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME PD3-1 LA GIITTER,J.
LER 88-003-08:on 880111,repetitive           violation of   ESF instrumentation       LCO   tolerances due to highly     RA values.
INTERNAL: ACNW AEOD/DS P/TPAB DEDRO NRR/DET/EMEB9H3 NRR/DLPQ/LPEB10 NRR/DREP/PRPB11 NRR/DST/SICB 7E NRR/DST/SRXB 8E RES/DSIR/EIB EXTERNAL: EG&G STUART,V.A LPDR NSIC MAYS,G NUDOCS FULL TXT COPIES LTTR ENCL 1 1'1 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 4 1 1 1 1 1 1 RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME PD3-1 PD AEOD/DOA AEOD/ROAB/DS P NRR/DET/ECMB 9H NRR/DLPQ/LHFB11 NRR/DOEA/OEAB11 NRR/DST/SELB 8D LB8D1 EG FILE 02 01 L ST LOBBY WARD NRC PDR NSIC MURPHY,G.A COPIES LTTR ENCL 1 1 1'2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 NOTE TO ALL"RIDS" RECIPIENTS:
W/9 DISTRIBUTION CODE: IE22T COPIES RECEIVED:LTR                   ENCL       SIZE:
PLEASE HELP US TO REDUCE WASTE!CONTACT THE DOCUMENT CONTROL DESK, ROOM Pl-37 (EXT.20079)TO ELIMINATE YOUR NAME FROM DISTRIBUTION LISTS FOR DOCUMENTS YOU DON'T NEED FULL TEXT CONVERSION REQUIRED TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED: LTTR 34 ENCL 34 Indiana Michigan Power Company Cook Nuclear Plant P.O.Box 458 Bridgman.Ml 49106 616 465 5901 INDIANA Nf CHIGiAN POWER June 22, 1990 United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk Rockville, Maryland 20852 Operating Licenses DPR-58 Docket No.50-316 Document Control Manager: In accordance with the criteria established by 10 CFR 50.73 entitled Licensee Event Re ortin S stem, the following report is being submitted:
TITLE: 50.73/50.9 Licensee Event Report (LER),               Incident Rpt, etc.
88-003-08 Sincerely,~~A.A.Blind Plant Manager AAB:clw Attachment CC 9OO/O2QQ i I-Di~D.H.Williams, Jr.A.B.Davis, Region III M.P.Alexich P.A.Barrett J.E.Borggren R.F.Kroeger B.Walters-Ft.Wayne NRC Resident Inspector J.G.Giitter, NRC J.G.Keppler M.R.Padgett G.Charnoff, Esp.Dottie Sherman, ANI Library D.Hahn INPO S.J.Brewer/B.P.
NOTES:
Lauzau 9t.Cyr'..";<)" i(iC)O>>j qq W(pg II NRC FORM 366 (569)V.S.NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION LICENSEE EVENT REPORT ILER)APPROVED OMB NO,31500104 EXPIRES: 4/30/92 ESTIMATED BURDEN PER RESPONSE TO COMPLY WTH THIS INFORMATION COLLECTION REQUESTt 500 HRS.FORWARD COMMENTS REGARDING BURDEN ESTIMATE TO THF.RECORDS ANO REPORTS MANAGEMENT BRANCH (F630>, U.S.NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION, WASHINGTON.
RECIPIENT              COPIES          RECIPIENT             COPIES ID CODE/NAME           LTTR ENCL '    ID  CODE/NAME        LTTR ENCL PD3-1 LA                   1      1    PD3-1 PD                  1    1 GIITTER,J.                         1 INTERNAL: ACNW                         2      2    AEOD/DOA                  1' AEOD/DS P/TPAB             1      1    AEOD/ROAB/DS P            2    2 DEDRO                      1      1    NRR/DET/ECMB 9H          1    1 NRR/DET/EMEB9H3             1      1    NRR/DLPQ/LHFB11          1    1 NRR/DLPQ/LPEB10            1      1    NRR/DOEA/OEAB11          1    1 NRR/DREP/PRPB11            2      2    NRR/DST/SELB 8D          1    1 NRR/DST/SICB 7E            1      1                LB8D1        1    1 NRR/DST/SRXB 8E             1      1    EG  FILE      02      1    1 RES/DSIR/EIB               1      1                    01      1    1 EXTERNAL: EG&G STUART,V.A               4      4    L ST LOBBY    WARD        1   1 LPDR                        1     1   NRC PDR                  1   1 NSIC MAYS,G                1     1   NSIC MURPHY,G.A          1   1 NUDOCS FULL TXT            1     1 NOTE TO ALL "RIDS" RECIPIENTS:
OC 20555, AND TO THE PAPERWORK REDUCTION PROJECT (31500104).
PLEASE HELP US TO REDUCE WASTE! CONTACT THE DOCUMENT CONTROL DESK, ROOM Pl-37 (EXT. 20079) TO ELIMINATEYOUR NAME FROM DISTRIBUTION LISTS FOR DOCUMENTS YOU DON'T NEED FULL TEXT CONVERSION REQUIRED TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED: LTTR              34    ENCL    34
OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT ANO BUDGET,WASHINGTON, OC20503.FACILITY NAME (I)D.C.COOK NUCLEAR PLANT-UNIT 2 DOCKET NUMBER (ll PA 0 5 0 0 03]6 1 OF0 REPETITIVE VIOLATION OF ESF INSTRUMENTATION LIMITING CONDITIONS FOR OPERATION TOLERANCES DUE TO HIGHLY RESTRICTIVE ALLOWABLE VALUES EVENT DATE(5)LER NUMBER (6)REPORT DATE (TI OTHER FACILITIES INVOLVED (Sl MOIITH OAY YEAR YKAR SEOUENTIAI NVMBEII:rvor','EVtSK MON'TH OAY YEAR NUMBEII FACILITY NAMES.C.COOK-UNIT 1 DOCKET NUMBER(5)0 5 0 0 0 0 1 8 8 0 0 0 06 22 90 0 5 0 0 0 THIS REPORT IS SUBMITTED PURSUANT T 0 THE RLQUIREMENTS OF 10 CF R (): (Check One or more ot the torrorrino>
 
(11 OPERATING MODK (9)1 20.405(c)60.36(c)(Il 50.36(c)(2>X 50 73(~l(2)R)50.73(c>12) lii)64.73(c I (2)(i i(I 20.402(tr>
Indiana Michigan Power Company Cook Nuclear Plant P.O. Box 458 Bridgman. Ml 49106 616 465 5901 INDIANA NfCHIGiAN POWER June 22, 1990 United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk Rockville, Maryland                20852 Operating Licenses DPR-58 Docket No. 50-316 Document          Control Manager:
10.405 (~l(1 I I I)20.405(el(1)(ii)20 405(~l(1 l(iiil 20.406(c)(I 1(iv)10.405(~Ill l(vl POWER LEVEL 0 50.7 3(e)(2)(>v)50.73(c)(2)(v)50.73(~)(2)(v9)50.73(el(21(viii)(A) 50.73(c)(2>(vi(1)
In accordance with the criteria established by 10 CFR 50.73 entitled Licensee Event Re ortin S stem, the following report is being submitted:
(6)50.73(~)(2>(c)73.71(II)73.71(c)OTHER (Soecity tn AOttrect Oererr~nd In 7ee f htRC Form 366A)LICENSKK CONTACT FOR THIS LER (12)*T.P.BEILMAN MAINTENANCE DEPARTMENT SUPERINTENDENT TELEPHONE NUMBER AREA CODE 61 6 65-59 1 COMPLETE.ONE LINE FOR EACH COMPONE)4T PAILVRE DESCRIBED IH THIS REPORT (13)CAUSE SYSTEM COMPONENT MANUFAC.TVRER TO HFROS Iy",~gg@r'Pk>FWmCp~
88-003-08 Sincerely, A.A. Blind
CAUSE SYSTEM COMPONENT Pere Irrpr,";.-:iPN MAHUItAC.TVRER EPORTABLE TO NPRDS a>pWPP~,i~lyP~
            ~  ~
SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT EXPEC'TED (14)MONTH DAY YEAR YES Iit yn, COmnrete fXPf CyfD SVSMISSIOty OATf I NO EXPECTED SUB MISS I 0 N DATE (15)ABSTRACT ILrmtt to te(k>tercet.r,~,, eooroeimetely Afteen tinpre toece tyoerrrrtten hnetl (16)This revision is being submitted to reflect an update on the results of the increased frequency (monthly)calibration checks performed to date.On March 11, 1988 an equipment trend investigation was being performed on 4KV Bus Loss of Voltage relays and the 4KV Bus Degraded Voltage relays (EIIS/EK-27).
Plant Manager AAB:clw Attachment CC        D.H. Williams, Jr.
The'as found'ondition of these relays.during past calibration checks has generally been found to be beyond the Technical Specification (T.S.)allowable values.Each relay was adjusted to within allowable values at the time it was discovered out of specification.
A.B. Davis, Region        III M.P. Alexich P.A. Barrett J.E. Borggren R.F. Kroeger B. Walters  Ft. Wayne NRC    Resident Inspector J.G. Giitter, NRC J.G. Keppler M.R. Padgett G. Charnoff, Esp.
All relays were functional and would have performed the ESF function, although at a slightly different voltage than specified in T.S.An engineering review has determined a plus or minus 3 percent tolerance (as opposed to the current 0.5 percent)to be acceptable for the Loss of Voltage application.
Dottie      Sherman, ANI  Library D. Hahn INPO S.J. Brewer/B.P. Lauzau                          W(pg 9OO/O2QQ I- Di~
The Degraded Voltage application will accept a plus or minus 1.5 percent tolerance and will r'equire installation of more accurate undervoltage relays (Design Change currently underway), A T.S.change request has been submitted.
i    9t. Cyr'..";
As stated in the original LER, we have increased the calibration frequency from every eighteen months to monthly.NRC Form 366 (64)91 NRC FORM 366A)669)US.NUCLEAR REGULA'TORY COMMISSION LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LERI TEXT CONTINUATION APPROVEO OMB NO.31500104 EXPIRESI 4/30/62 ESTIMATED BURDEN PEA RESPONSE TO COMPLY WTH THIS INFORMATION COLLECTION REQUEST;500 HRS.FORWARD COMMEN'TS REGARDING BURDEN ESTIMATE TO THE RECORDS AND REPOATS MANAGEMENT BRANCH (P.530).U.S, NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION, WASHINGTON.
              < )" i(iC)O>> j qq II
DC 20555, AND TO 1HE PAPERWORK REDUCTION PROJECT 13')500)04), OFFICE OF MANAGEMFNT AND BUDGET,WASHINGTON, DC 20503.FACILITY NAME 11)D.C.COOK NUCLEAR PLANT" UNIT 2 DOCKET NUMBER 12)YEAR LER NUMBER LS).'<."I SEQUENTIAL NUM SR Ill 45VISION NI/M 6 4 PAGE 13)TEXT l///44/4 SPPCe JI/PFVPPd.I/>>Pdd/Pe/M//YRC FP//4 366A 3/l)Tl o s o o o 3 1688-0 3 0 8 02oFO This revision is being submitted to reflect an update on the results of the increased frequency (monthly)calibration checks performed to date.Conditions Prior to Occurrence Unit 1 and Unit 2 were operating at 90 percent and 80 percent reactor thermal power, respectively, throughout the event.There were no inoperative struc-tures, components, or systems that contributed to this event.Descri tion of Event On March ll, 1988, an equipment trend investigation was being performed on the 4KV Bus Loss of Voltage relays (EIIS/EK-27) and the 4KV Bus Degraded Voltage relays (EIIS/EK-27).
 
The setpoints for these relays have been found to be outside of the Technical Specification (T.S.)allowable values (T.S.3.3.2.1 Table 3.3-4, items 8a and 8b).Of 144 individual calibrations on the loss of voltage relays over a seven year period, 68 were found to be outside of the T.S.tolerances.
NRC FORM 366                                                                    V.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION (569)                                                                                                                                      APPROVED OMB NO,31500104 EXPIRES: 4/30/92 ESTIMATED BURDEN PER RESPONSE TO COMPLY WTH THIS INFORMATION COLLECTION REQUESTt 500 HRS. FORWARD LICENSEE EVENT REPORT ILER)                                                              COMMENTS REGARDING BURDEN ESTIMATE TO THF. RECORDS ANO REPORTS MANAGEMENT BRANCH (F630>, U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION, WASHINGTON. OC 20555, AND TO THE PAPERWORK REDUCTION PROJECT (31500104). OFFICE OF MANAGEMENTANO BUDGET,WASHINGTON, OC20503.
Of the 66 individual calibrations performed on the degraded voltage relays over a seven year period, 41'ere found to be outside of the T.S.tolerances.
FACILITY NAME (I)                                                                                                                      DOCKET NUMBER      (ll                        PA D. C. COOK NUCLEAR PLANT - UNIT 2                                                                                          0 5 0 0 03                    ] 6        1  OF0 REPETITIVE VIOLATION OF ESF INSTRUMENTATION LIMITING CONDITIONS FOR OPERATION TOLERANCES DUE TO HIGHLY RESTRICTIVE ALLOWABLE VALUES EVENT DATE(5)                         LER NUMBER (6)                           REPORT DATE (TI                          OTHER FACILITIES INVOLVED (Sl MOIITH      OAY      YEAR    YKAR              SEOUENTIAI :rvor','EVtSK      MON'TH        OAY    YEAR              FACILITYNAMES                      DOCKET NUMBER(5)
The amount of deviation from the allowable setpoint band was limited and distribution among the relays was random, indicating no particular relay to be defective.
NVMBEII        NUMBEII
A survey of other utilities which use this type of relay revealed that the performance of our relays is consistent with their experience and within manufacturer's specifications.
                                                                                                            .C. COOK      - UNIT        1              0    5    0    0    0 0      1            8 8                          0 0              0          06 22 90                                                                    0    5    0    0    0 THIS REPORT IS SUBMITTED PURSUANT T 0 THE RLQUIREMENTS OF 10 CF R (): (Check One or more ot the torrorrino> (11 OPERATING MODK (9) 1        20.402(tr>                                  20.405(c)                          50.7 3(e) (2) (>v)                          73.71(II)
Each relay was readjusted to within allowable values at the time it was discovered out of specification.
POWER                          10.405  ( ~ l(1 I I I)                      60.36(c)  (Il                      50.73(c)(2) (v)                              73.71(c)
The Loss of Voltage relays are installed to sense a loss of offsite or normal auxiliary power to the ESS 4KV buses.Once the loss of voltage has been sensed and after a two-second time delay, these relays in a 2/3 phases logic initiate load shedding and emergency diesel generator starting.The Degraded Bus Voltage relays are installed to sense degraded reserve power feed to the ESS 4KV buses and, on a 2/3 phases logic with a two-minute time delay, trip open the reserve Seed breakers and start the emergency diesel generators.
LEVEL 0                   20.405(el(1) (ii)                          50.36(c) (2>                       50.73( ~ )(2)(v9)                           OTHER (Soecity tn AOttrect Oererr ~ nd In 7ee f htRC Form 20 405( ~ l(1 l(iiil                  X    50 73( ~ l(2)R)                     50.73(el(21(viii)(A)                       366A )
Once the emergency diesel generator has restored bus voltage to normal, safety loads are sequenced on to the safety buses.The Technical Specifications for Units 1 and 2 have existing setpoints of 80 percent (+.5%,-1.0%)for the Loss of Voltage and 90 percent (+1.0%,-.5%)for the Degraded Grid detection.
20.406(c) (I 1(iv)                         50.73(c>12)  lii)                  50.73(c)(2>(vi(1) (6) 10.405( ~ Illl(vl                          64.73(c I (2)(i i(I                50.73( ~ )(2>(c)
The tolerance on these setpoints are tighter than the relays can obtain, and more importantly, tighter than required for performing their intended function, i.e., sensing loss of normal voltage, initiating load shedding, and diesel starting.NRC Fon4366A 168S)
LICENSKK CONTACT FOR THIS LER (12)
NRC FORM S66A (689(V.S, NUCI.EAR REGULATORY COMMISSION LlCENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER)TEXT CONTINUATION APPROV ED OMB'NO, S(50010<EXPIRES;ol50(99 EST(MA'TEO BUROFN PER RESPONSE TO COMPLY WTH THIS INFORMATION COLLECTION REQUEST.'00 HRS.FORWARD COMMENTS REGARDING BURDEN'ESTIMATE TO THE RECORDS AND REPORTS MANAGEMENT BRANCH (P 5501.U.S.NUCLEAR REGV(.ATORY COMMISSION.
T. P. BEILMAN                                                                                                                      AREA CODE TELEPHONE NUMBER MAINTENANCE DEPARTMENT SUPERINTENDENT 61        6          65-            59            1 COMPLETE. ONE LINE FOR EACH COMPONE)4T PAILVRE DESCRIBED IH THIS REPORT (13)
WASHINGTON.
CAUSE    SYSTEM      COMPONENT            MANUFAC.                                                                                      MAHUItAC.           EPORTABLE TVRER          TO HFROS      Iy ",~gg@r'Pk>FWmCp~   CAUSE SYSTEM  COMPONENT TVRER            TO NPRDS Pere Irrpr,";.-:iPN                                                                            a >pWPP~,i~lyP~
DC 90555, AND TO 1HE PAPERWORK REDUCTION PROJECT IS(500(OOI.
SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT EXPEC'TED (14)                                                                             MONTH        DAY    YEAR EXPECTED SUB MISS I 0 N DATE (15)
OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET, WASHINGTON, DC 90509.FACILITY NAIAE (11 D.C.COOK NUCLEAR PLANT" UNIT 2 TEXT ill moro Aooco lo (ouuwod.upp oddi doool lVRC Foun JESA'Jl (IT)DOCKET NVMBER (EI YEAR o s o o o 31 88 LER NUMBER L61 SEQUENTIAL NUMOER 0 3 ggS REVISION ou NVMSSR 0 8 PAGE (Sl 0 3 0F 04 Cause of Event Calibration history shows a performance record in line with undervoltage relays used at other plants.We have reviewed the application of undervoltage relays for this function with other utilities and various relay manufacturers.
YES Iit yn, COmnrete fXPfCyfD SVSMISSIOty OATfI                                          NO ABSTRACT ILrmtt to te(k> tercet. r, ~,, eooroeimetely Afteen tinpre toece tyoerrrrtten hnetl (16)
We have concluded that the undervoltage relays are being properly applied in this mode as a conventional protective relay.This use would not normally involve having an acceptance band.Hany utilities consulted had no Technical Specification required tolerances for this function and others had broader allowance values which more closely reflect the manufacturer's expected performance tolerances.
This revision is being submitted to reflect an update on the results of the increased frequency (monthly) calibration checks performed to date.
Anal sis of Event American Electric Power's System voltage studies have been performed and indicate that the worst case voltage on the ESS buses at the Cook Nuclear Plant would be 87.3 percent.We do not expect the ESS bus voltage to drop to a lower voltage than this unless a complete plant blackout condition occurred.Under a blackout condition, the ESS bus voltage would quickly drop well below the 80 percent undervoltage relay setpoint and initiate load shedding and diesel start.ESS us v The only function of the 80 percent voltage relays is to seme a total l f oss 0 bus voltage.Therefore, the setpoint deviations we'e experienced translate into a different line voltage and time than the Technical Specification calls for, but the time involved for this additional voltage drop is insignificant.
On    March 11, 1988 an equipment trend investigation was being performed on 4KV Bus Loss          of Voltage relays and the 4KV Bus Degraded Voltage relays (EIIS/EK-27).
The function of the degraded bus relays are to disconnect the plant from the grid for a sustained degraded condition, i.e., less than 90 percent.voltage for at least.two minutes.They are armed only when the plant is fed from offsite.power.Plant normal configuration is to be fed from the generator auxiliary transformers except for short periods during startup and shutdown.Therefore, these relays are not normally active during unit operation.
The 'as found'ondition of these relays. during past calibration checks has generally been found to be beyond the Technical Specification (T.S.) allowable values. Each relay was adjusted to within allowable values at the time                                                                                it    was discovered out of specification. All relays were functional and would have performed the                ESF            function, although at                    a  slightly different voltage                            than specified in T.S.
Again, relating to our system studies, we do not believe the shift out of tolerance to be a safety problem for the degraded bus relays.Our studies indicate that the lowest possible offsite voltage to our buses would be 93.3 percent except for the short period during Reactor Coolant Pump (RCP)starting, which is less than one minute.During RCP starting, the bus voltage can dip to 87.3 percent, however, we are protected from an unnecessary trip by the two-minute time delay on this circuit.N8 C Foun S66A (6$91 NRC FORM 366A (689 I V.S.NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER)TEXT CONTINUATION APPROVED OM8 NO, 3I500106 E XP IR ES: A/30/93 ESTIMATED 8VRDEN PER RESPONSE TO COMPLY WTH THIS INFORMATION COLLECTION REOVEST-, 500 HRS.FORWARD COMMENTS REGARDING 8URDEN ESTIMATE TO THE RECORDS AND REPORTS MANAGEMENT BRANCH IP630).U.S.NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION.
An    engineering review has determined a plus or minus 3 percent tolerance (as opposed to the                    current 0.5 percent) to be acceptable for the Loss of Voltage application. The Degraded Voltage application will accept a plus or minus 1.5 percent tolerance and will r'equire installation of more accurate undervoltage relays (Design Change currently underway), A T.S. change request has been submitted. As stated in the original LER, we have increased the calibration frequency from every eighteen months to monthly.
WASHINGTON.
NRC Form 366 (64)91
DC 30555, AND To 1HE PAPERWORK REDUCTION PROJECT I31504104I, OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND 8VDGET,WASHINGTON, DC 30503, FACILITY NAME III D.C.COOK NUCLEAR PLANT-UNIT 2 DOCKET NUMBER I2/LER NUMBER IEI YEAR': 9 66QUENNAL'".n<Y'6&#x17d; NUM668 r'NUM 6 n PAGE IS)TEXT/ll nuup pnpco/F Puquuud, upp pddnenp//YRC%%d 366A 9/I I TI 0 5 0 0 0 3 1 8 8-0 3 0 8 0 An engineering review has determined a plus or minus 3 percent tolerance (as opposed to the current 0.5 percent)to be acceptable for the Loss of Voltage application.
 
Most of the calibration history data is within 3 percent of the required setpoint.The few exceptions are considered nqrmal random failures.The Degraded Voltage application will accept a plus or minus 1.5 percent tolerance.
NRC FORM 366A                                                          US. NUCLEAR REGULA'TORY COMMISSION
This value is suitable for the installation of more accurate undervoltage relays.Based on the above, it has been concluded that there is no jeopazdy to the health and safety of the public as a result of this event.Corrective Action The relays were recalibrated to within the allowable values at the time of discovery during the calibration.
  )669)                                                                                                                      APPROVEO OMB NO. 31500104 EXPIRESI 4/30/62 LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LERI                                            ESTIMATED BURDEN PEA RESPONSE TO COMPLY WTH THIS INFORMATION COLLECTION REQUEST; 500 HRS. FORWARD COMMEN'TS REGARDING BURDEN ESTIMATE TO THE RECORDS TEXT CONTINUATION                                                AND REPOATS MANAGEMENT BRANCH (P.530). U.S, NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION, WASHINGTON. DC 20555, AND TO 1HE PAPERWORK REDUCTION PROJECT 13')500)04), OFFICE OF MANAGEMFNTAND BUDGET,WASHINGTON, DC 20503.
An engineering review has determined a plus or minus 3 percent tolerance to be acceptable for the Loss of Voltage application and a plus or minus 1.5 percent tolerance for the Degraded Voltage application.
FACILITY NAME 11)                                                            DOCKET NUMBER 12)
A Technical Specification change request has been submitted.
LER NUMBER  LS)                PAGE 13)
In addition, a Design Change regarding the replacement of the currently installed Degraded Voltage relays with more accurate relays is scheduled to be completed at the next refueling outages for both units.As stated in the original LER, we have increased the calibration frequency from every eighteen months to monthly until the trend indicates a different frequency is justified.
YEAR  .'<."I SEQUENTIAL NUM SR    Ill 45VISION NI/M 46 D. C. COOK NUCLEAR PLANT " UNIT 2 TEXT l///44/4 SPPCe JI /PFVPPd. I/>> Pdd/Pe/M//YRC FP//4 366A 3/ l)Tl o  s  o  o  o  3  1688 0                    3        0 8    02oFO This revision is being submitted to reflect an update on the results of the increased frequency (monthly) calibration checks performed to date.
Monthly calibration checks have yielded the following results to date: 4KV Loss of Voltage-528 calibrations 65 failures 12.3 percent 4KV Degraded Voltage-264 calibrations 41 failures 15.5 percent Failed Com onent Identification None.Previous Similar Events LER 316/81-015 LER 315/81-017 LER 315/82-051 LER 315/82-059 LER 316/82-100 LER 316/82-108 LER 315/83-069 L'ER 315/83-094 NRC Form 366A I669)}}
Conditions Prior to Occurrence Unit      1   and     Unit 2 were operating at 90 percent and 80 percent reactor thermal power,          respectively, throughout the event. There were no inoperative struc-tures, components, or systems that contributed to this event.
Descri tion of Event On    March        ll,      1988, an equipment trend investigation was being performed on the 4KV Bus Loss                of Voltage relays (EIIS/EK-27) and the 4KV Bus Degraded Voltage relays (EIIS/EK-27). The setpoints for these relays have been found to be outside of the Technical Specification (T.S.) allowable values (T.S. 3.3.2.1 Table 3.3-4, items 8a and 8b). Of 144 individual calibrations on the loss of voltage relays over a seven year period, 68 were found to be outside of the T.S.
tolerances. Of the 66 individual calibrations performed on the degraded voltage relays over a seven year period, 41'ere found to be outside of the T.S.
tolerances. The amount of deviation from the allowable setpoint band was limited and distribution among the relays was random, indicating no particular relay to be defective. A survey of other utilities which use this type of relay revealed that the performance of our relays is consistent with their experience and within manufacturer's specifications.                                      Each relay was readjusted to within allowable values at the time it was discovered out of specification.
The Loss            of Voltage relays are installed to sense a loss of offsite or normal auxiliary            power to the ESS 4KV buses.                         Once the loss of voltage has been sensed and after            a two-second time delay, these relays in a 2/3 phases logic initiate load shedding and emergency diesel generator starting. The Degraded Bus Voltage relays are installed to sense degraded reserve power feed to the ESS 4KV buses and, on a 2/3 phases logic with a two-minute time delay, trip open the reserve Seed breakers and start the emergency diesel generators.                                               Once the emergency diesel generator has restored bus voltage to normal, safety loads are sequenced on to the safety buses.                                The Technical Specifications for Units 1 and 2 have existing setpoints of 80 percent (+.5%, -1.0%) for the Loss of Voltage and 90 percent (+1.0%, -.5%) for the Degraded Grid detection. The tolerance on these setpoints are tighter than the relays can obtain, and more importantly, tighter than required for performing their intended function, i.e., sensing loss of normal voltage, initiating load shedding, and diesel starting.
NRC Fon4366A 168S)
 
V.S, NUCI.EAR REGULATORY COMMISSION                APPROV ED OMB 'NO, S(50010<
NRC FORM S66A (689(                                                                                                                          EXPIRES; ol50(99 WTH THIS EST(MA'TEO BUROFN PER RESPONSE TO COMPLY FORWARD LlCENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER)                                              INFORMATION COLLECTION REQUEST.'00 HRS. THE RECORDS COMMENTS  REGARDING  BURDEN  'ESTIMATE TO NUCLEAR AND REPORTS MANAGEMENT BRANCH (P 5501. U.S.
TEXT CONTINUATION                                                REGV(.ATORY COMMISSION. WASHINGTON. DC 90555, AND    TO OFFICE 1HE PAPERWORK REDUCTION PROJECT IS(500(OOI.
OF MANAGEMENTAND BUDGET, WASHINGTON, DC 90509.
REVISION        PAGE (Sl DOCKET NVMBER (EI                      LER NUMBER L61 FACILITY NAIAE (11 SEQUENTIAL ggS YEAR          NUMOER    ou NVMSSR COOK NUCLEAR PLANT
                                                            " UNIT  2 D. C.
o  s  o  o  o  31        88          0      3        0 8      0 3 0F      04 JESA'Jl (IT)
TEXT illmoro Aooco lo (ouuwod. upp oddi doool lVRC Foun Cause        of Event Calibration history shows a performance record in line with undervoltage relays used      at other plants. We have reviewed the application of undervoltage relays for this function with other utilities and various relay manufacturers.
We    have concluded that the undervoltage relays are being properly applied in this      mode as a conventional protective relay.                                  This use would not normally involve having an acceptance band. Hany                                      utilities      consulted had no Technical Specification required tolerances for this function and others had broader allowance values which more closely reflect the manufacturer's expected performance tolerances.
Anal sis of Event American            Electric Power's System voltage studies have been performed and indicate that the worst case voltage on the ESS buses at the Cook Nuclear Plant would be 87.3 percent. We do not expect the ESS bus voltage to drop to a lower voltage than this unless a complete plant blackout condition occurred. Under a blackout condition, the ESS bus voltage would quickly drop well below the 80 percent undervoltage relay setpoint and initiate load shedding and diesel start.
The only function of the 80 percent voltage relays is to seme a total oss 0 f                                                  l ESS bus    us v  voltage. Therefore, the setpoint deviations we'e experienced translate into a different line voltage and time than the Technical Specification calls for, but the time involved for this additional voltage drop is insignificant.
The    function of the degraded bus relays are to disconnect the plant from the grid for a sustained degraded condition, i.e., less than 90 percent. voltage for at least.two minutes. They are armed only when the plant is fed from offsite .
power. Plant normal configuration is to be fed from the generator auxiliary transformers except for short periods during startup and shutdown. Therefore, these relays are not normally active during unit operation.
Again, relating to our system studies, we do not believe the shift out of tolerance to be a safety problem for the degraded bus relays. Our studies indicate that the lowest possible offsite voltage to our buses would be 93.3 percent except for the short period during Reactor Coolant Pump (RCP) starting, which is less than one minute. During RCP starting, the bus voltage can dip to 87.3 percent, however, we are protected from an unnecessary trip by the two-minute time delay on this circuit.
N8 C Foun S66A (6$ 91
 
NRC FORM 366A                                                            V.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION (689 I                                                                                                                    APPROVED OM8 NO, 3I500106 E XP IR ES: A/30/93 LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER)                                                ESTIMATED 8VRDEN PER RESPONSE TO COMPLY WTH THIS INFORMATION COLLECTION REOVEST-, 500 HRS. FORWARD TEXT CONTINUATION                                                    COMMENTS REGARDING 8URDEN ESTIMATE TO THE RECORDS AND REPORTS MANAGEMENT BRANCH IP630). U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION. WASHINGTON. DC 30555, AND To 1HE PAPERWORK REDUCTION PROJECT I31504104I, OFFICE OF MANAGEMENTAND 8VDGET,WASHINGTON, DC 30503, FACILITY NAME III                                                              DOCKET NUMBER I2/
LER NUMBER IEI                  PAGE IS)
YEAR  ': 9 66QUENNAL NUM668
                                                                                                                                      '".n<Y'6' r'  NUM    6 n D. C.      COOK NUCLEAR PLANT                      - UNIT      2 0  5  0 0  0  3  1      8 8    0          3            0 8 0 TEXT /llnuup pnpco /F Puquuud, upp pddnenp/ /YRC %%d 366A 9/ I I TI An    engineering review has determined a plus or minus 3 percent tolerance (as opposed          to the current 0.5 percent) to be acceptable for the Loss of Voltage application. Most of the calibration history data is within 3 percent of the required setpoint. The few exceptions are considered nqrmal random failures.
The Degraded Voltage application will accept a plus or minus 1.5 percent tolerance. This value is suitable for the installation of more accurate undervoltage relays.
Based on the above,                      it    has been concluded that                there is no jeopazdy to the health and safety of the public as a result of                                          this event.
Corrective Action The    relays were recalibrated to within the allowable values at the time of discovery during the calibration. An engineering review has determined a plus or minus 3 percent tolerance to be acceptable for the Loss of Voltage application and a plus or minus 1.5 percent tolerance for the Degraded Voltage application. A Technical Specification change request has been submitted. In addition, a Design Change regarding the replacement of the currently installed Degraded Voltage relays with more accurate relays is scheduled to be completed at the next refueling outages for both units. As stated in the original LER, we have increased the calibration frequency from every eighteen months to monthly until the trend indicates a different frequency is justified.
Monthly calibration checks have yielded the following results to date:
4KV Loss          of Voltage                  -  528  calibrations                              12.3 percent 65  failures 4KV Degraded              Voltage -              264  calibrations                              15.5 percent 41  failures Failed          Com      onent      Identification None.
Previous Similar Events LER      316/81-015                                    LER  316/82-108 LER      315/81-017                                    LER  315/83-069 LER      315/82-051                                    L'ER  315/83-094 LER     315/82-059 LER     316/82-100 NRC Form 366A I669)}}

Latest revision as of 01:51, 4 February 2020

LER 88-003-08:on 880111,repetitive Violation of ESF Instrumentation Limiting Condition for Operation Tolerances Occurred.Caused by Highly Restrictive Allowable Values. Calibr Frequencies Increased to monthly.W/900622 Ltr
ML17328A301
Person / Time
Site: Cook American Electric Power icon.png
Issue date: 06/22/1990
From: Beilman T, Blind A
INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER CO. (FORMERLY INDIANA & MICHIG
To:
NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
References
LER-88-003, LER-88-3, NUDOCS 9007020032
Download: ML17328A301 (6)


Text

ACCELERATED UTION DEMONS'ATION SYSTEM REGULATORY INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (RIDS)

ACCESSION NBR:9007020032 DOC.DATE: 90/06/22 NOTARIZED: NO DOCKET FACIL:50-316 Donald C. Cook Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 2, Indiana & 05000316 AUTH. NAME AUTHOR AFFILIATION BEILMAN,T.P. Indiana Michigan Power Co. (formerly Indiana & Michigan Ele BLIND,A.A. Indiana Michigan Power Co. (formerly Indiana & Michigan Ele RECIP.NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION

SUBJECT:

LER 88-003-08:on 880111,repetitive violation of ESF instrumentation LCO tolerances due to highly RA values.

W/9 DISTRIBUTION CODE: IE22T COPIES RECEIVED:LTR ENCL SIZE:

TITLE: 50.73/50.9 Licensee Event Report (LER), Incident Rpt, etc.

NOTES:

RECIPIENT COPIES RECIPIENT COPIES ID CODE/NAME LTTR ENCL ' ID CODE/NAME LTTR ENCL PD3-1 LA 1 1 PD3-1 PD 1 1 GIITTER,J. 1 INTERNAL: ACNW 2 2 AEOD/DOA 1' AEOD/DS P/TPAB 1 1 AEOD/ROAB/DS P 2 2 DEDRO 1 1 NRR/DET/ECMB 9H 1 1 NRR/DET/EMEB9H3 1 1 NRR/DLPQ/LHFB11 1 1 NRR/DLPQ/LPEB10 1 1 NRR/DOEA/OEAB11 1 1 NRR/DREP/PRPB11 2 2 NRR/DST/SELB 8D 1 1 NRR/DST/SICB 7E 1 1 LB8D1 1 1 NRR/DST/SRXB 8E 1 1 EG FILE 02 1 1 RES/DSIR/EIB 1 1 01 1 1 EXTERNAL: EG&G STUART,V.A 4 4 L ST LOBBY WARD 1 1 LPDR 1 1 NRC PDR 1 1 NSIC MAYS,G 1 1 NSIC MURPHY,G.A 1 1 NUDOCS FULL TXT 1 1 NOTE TO ALL "RIDS" RECIPIENTS:

PLEASE HELP US TO REDUCE WASTE! CONTACT THE DOCUMENT CONTROL DESK, ROOM Pl-37 (EXT. 20079) TO ELIMINATEYOUR NAME FROM DISTRIBUTION LISTS FOR DOCUMENTS YOU DON'T NEED FULL TEXT CONVERSION REQUIRED TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED: LTTR 34 ENCL 34

Indiana Michigan Power Company Cook Nuclear Plant P.O. Box 458 Bridgman. Ml 49106 616 465 5901 INDIANA NfCHIGiAN POWER June 22, 1990 United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk Rockville, Maryland 20852 Operating Licenses DPR-58 Docket No. 50-316 Document Control Manager:

In accordance with the criteria established by 10 CFR 50.73 entitled Licensee Event Re ortin S stem, the following report is being submitted:

88-003-08 Sincerely, A.A. Blind

~ ~

Plant Manager AAB:clw Attachment CC D.H. Williams, Jr.

A.B. Davis, Region III M.P. Alexich P.A. Barrett J.E. Borggren R.F. Kroeger B. Walters Ft. Wayne NRC Resident Inspector J.G. Giitter, NRC J.G. Keppler M.R. Padgett G. Charnoff, Esp.

Dottie Sherman, ANI Library D. Hahn INPO S.J. Brewer/B.P. Lauzau W(pg 9OO/O2QQ I- Di~

i 9t. Cyr'..";

< )" i(iC)O>> j qq II

NRC FORM 366 V.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION (569) APPROVED OMB NO,31500104 EXPIRES: 4/30/92 ESTIMATED BURDEN PER RESPONSE TO COMPLY WTH THIS INFORMATION COLLECTION REQUESTt 500 HRS. FORWARD LICENSEE EVENT REPORT ILER) COMMENTS REGARDING BURDEN ESTIMATE TO THF. RECORDS ANO REPORTS MANAGEMENT BRANCH (F630>, U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION, WASHINGTON. OC 20555, AND TO THE PAPERWORK REDUCTION PROJECT (31500104). OFFICE OF MANAGEMENTANO BUDGET,WASHINGTON, OC20503.

FACILITY NAME (I) DOCKET NUMBER (ll PA D. C. COOK NUCLEAR PLANT - UNIT 2 0 5 0 0 03 ] 6 1 OF0 REPETITIVE VIOLATION OF ESF INSTRUMENTATION LIMITING CONDITIONS FOR OPERATION TOLERANCES DUE TO HIGHLY RESTRICTIVE ALLOWABLE VALUES EVENT DATE(5) LER NUMBER (6) REPORT DATE (TI OTHER FACILITIES INVOLVED (Sl MOIITH OAY YEAR YKAR SEOUENTIAI :rvor','EVtSK MON'TH OAY YEAR FACILITYNAMES DOCKET NUMBER(5)

NVMBEII NUMBEII

.C. COOK - UNIT 1 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 8 8 0 0 0 06 22 90 0 5 0 0 0 THIS REPORT IS SUBMITTED PURSUANT T 0 THE RLQUIREMENTS OF 10 CF R (): (Check One or more ot the torrorrino> (11 OPERATING MODK (9) 1 20.402(tr> 20.405(c) 50.7 3(e) (2) (>v) 73.71(II)

POWER 10.405 ( ~ l(1 I I I) 60.36(c) (Il 50.73(c)(2) (v) 73.71(c)

LEVEL 0 20.405(el(1) (ii) 50.36(c) (2> 50.73( ~ )(2)(v9) OTHER (Soecity tn AOttrect Oererr ~ nd In 7ee f htRC Form 20 405( ~ l(1 l(iiil X 50 73( ~ l(2)R) 50.73(el(21(viii)(A) 366A )

20.406(c) (I 1(iv) 50.73(c>12) lii) 50.73(c)(2>(vi(1) (6) 10.405( ~ Illl(vl 64.73(c I (2)(i i(I 50.73( ~ )(2>(c)

LICENSKK CONTACT FOR THIS LER (12)

T. P. BEILMAN AREA CODE TELEPHONE NUMBER MAINTENANCE DEPARTMENT SUPERINTENDENT 61 6 65- 59 1 COMPLETE. ONE LINE FOR EACH COMPONE)4T PAILVRE DESCRIBED IH THIS REPORT (13)

CAUSE SYSTEM COMPONENT MANUFAC. MAHUItAC. EPORTABLE TVRER TO HFROS Iy ",~gg@r'Pk>FWmCp~ CAUSE SYSTEM COMPONENT TVRER TO NPRDS Pere Irrpr,";.-:iPN a >pWPP~,i~lyP~

SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT EXPEC'TED (14) MONTH DAY YEAR EXPECTED SUB MISS I 0 N DATE (15)

YES Iit yn, COmnrete fXPfCyfD SVSMISSIOty OATfI NO ABSTRACT ILrmtt to te(k> tercet. r, ~,, eooroeimetely Afteen tinpre toece tyoerrrrtten hnetl (16)

This revision is being submitted to reflect an update on the results of the increased frequency (monthly) calibration checks performed to date.

On March 11, 1988 an equipment trend investigation was being performed on 4KV Bus Loss of Voltage relays and the 4KV Bus Degraded Voltage relays (EIIS/EK-27).

The 'as found'ondition of these relays. during past calibration checks has generally been found to be beyond the Technical Specification (T.S.) allowable values. Each relay was adjusted to within allowable values at the time it was discovered out of specification. All relays were functional and would have performed the ESF function, although at a slightly different voltage than specified in T.S.

An engineering review has determined a plus or minus 3 percent tolerance (as opposed to the current 0.5 percent) to be acceptable for the Loss of Voltage application. The Degraded Voltage application will accept a plus or minus 1.5 percent tolerance and will r'equire installation of more accurate undervoltage relays (Design Change currently underway), A T.S. change request has been submitted. As stated in the original LER, we have increased the calibration frequency from every eighteen months to monthly.

NRC Form 366 (64)91

NRC FORM 366A US. NUCLEAR REGULA'TORY COMMISSION

)669) APPROVEO OMB NO. 31500104 EXPIRESI 4/30/62 LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LERI ESTIMATED BURDEN PEA RESPONSE TO COMPLY WTH THIS INFORMATION COLLECTION REQUEST; 500 HRS. FORWARD COMMEN'TS REGARDING BURDEN ESTIMATE TO THE RECORDS TEXT CONTINUATION AND REPOATS MANAGEMENT BRANCH (P.530). U.S, NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION, WASHINGTON. DC 20555, AND TO 1HE PAPERWORK REDUCTION PROJECT 13')500)04), OFFICE OF MANAGEMFNTAND BUDGET,WASHINGTON, DC 20503.

FACILITY NAME 11) DOCKET NUMBER 12)

LER NUMBER LS) PAGE 13)

YEAR .'<."I SEQUENTIAL NUM SR Ill 45VISION NI/M 46 D. C. COOK NUCLEAR PLANT " UNIT 2 TEXT l///44/4 SPPCe JI /PFVPPd. I/>> Pdd/Pe/M//YRC FP//4 366A 3/ l)Tl o s o o o 3 1688 0 3 0 8 02oFO This revision is being submitted to reflect an update on the results of the increased frequency (monthly) calibration checks performed to date.

Conditions Prior to Occurrence Unit 1 and Unit 2 were operating at 90 percent and 80 percent reactor thermal power, respectively, throughout the event. There were no inoperative struc-tures, components, or systems that contributed to this event.

Descri tion of Event On March ll, 1988, an equipment trend investigation was being performed on the 4KV Bus Loss of Voltage relays (EIIS/EK-27) and the 4KV Bus Degraded Voltage relays (EIIS/EK-27). The setpoints for these relays have been found to be outside of the Technical Specification (T.S.) allowable values (T.S. 3.3.2.1 Table 3.3-4, items 8a and 8b). Of 144 individual calibrations on the loss of voltage relays over a seven year period, 68 were found to be outside of the T.S.

tolerances. Of the 66 individual calibrations performed on the degraded voltage relays over a seven year period, 41'ere found to be outside of the T.S.

tolerances. The amount of deviation from the allowable setpoint band was limited and distribution among the relays was random, indicating no particular relay to be defective. A survey of other utilities which use this type of relay revealed that the performance of our relays is consistent with their experience and within manufacturer's specifications. Each relay was readjusted to within allowable values at the time it was discovered out of specification.

The Loss of Voltage relays are installed to sense a loss of offsite or normal auxiliary power to the ESS 4KV buses. Once the loss of voltage has been sensed and after a two-second time delay, these relays in a 2/3 phases logic initiate load shedding and emergency diesel generator starting. The Degraded Bus Voltage relays are installed to sense degraded reserve power feed to the ESS 4KV buses and, on a 2/3 phases logic with a two-minute time delay, trip open the reserve Seed breakers and start the emergency diesel generators. Once the emergency diesel generator has restored bus voltage to normal, safety loads are sequenced on to the safety buses. The Technical Specifications for Units 1 and 2 have existing setpoints of 80 percent (+.5%, -1.0%) for the Loss of Voltage and 90 percent (+1.0%, -.5%) for the Degraded Grid detection. The tolerance on these setpoints are tighter than the relays can obtain, and more importantly, tighter than required for performing their intended function, i.e., sensing loss of normal voltage, initiating load shedding, and diesel starting.

NRC Fon4366A 168S)

V.S, NUCI.EAR REGULATORY COMMISSION APPROV ED OMB 'NO, S(50010<

NRC FORM S66A (689( EXPIRES; ol50(99 WTH THIS EST(MA'TEO BUROFN PER RESPONSE TO COMPLY FORWARD LlCENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER) INFORMATION COLLECTION REQUEST.'00 HRS. THE RECORDS COMMENTS REGARDING BURDEN 'ESTIMATE TO NUCLEAR AND REPORTS MANAGEMENT BRANCH (P 5501. U.S.

TEXT CONTINUATION REGV(.ATORY COMMISSION. WASHINGTON. DC 90555, AND TO OFFICE 1HE PAPERWORK REDUCTION PROJECT IS(500(OOI.

OF MANAGEMENTAND BUDGET, WASHINGTON, DC 90509.

REVISION PAGE (Sl DOCKET NVMBER (EI LER NUMBER L61 FACILITY NAIAE (11 SEQUENTIAL ggS YEAR NUMOER ou NVMSSR COOK NUCLEAR PLANT

" UNIT 2 D. C.

o s o o o 31 88 0 3 0 8 0 3 0F 04 JESA'Jl (IT)

TEXT illmoro Aooco lo (ouuwod. upp oddi doool lVRC Foun Cause of Event Calibration history shows a performance record in line with undervoltage relays used at other plants. We have reviewed the application of undervoltage relays for this function with other utilities and various relay manufacturers.

We have concluded that the undervoltage relays are being properly applied in this mode as a conventional protective relay. This use would not normally involve having an acceptance band. Hany utilities consulted had no Technical Specification required tolerances for this function and others had broader allowance values which more closely reflect the manufacturer's expected performance tolerances.

Anal sis of Event American Electric Power's System voltage studies have been performed and indicate that the worst case voltage on the ESS buses at the Cook Nuclear Plant would be 87.3 percent. We do not expect the ESS bus voltage to drop to a lower voltage than this unless a complete plant blackout condition occurred. Under a blackout condition, the ESS bus voltage would quickly drop well below the 80 percent undervoltage relay setpoint and initiate load shedding and diesel start.

The only function of the 80 percent voltage relays is to seme a total oss 0 f l ESS bus us v voltage. Therefore, the setpoint deviations we'e experienced translate into a different line voltage and time than the Technical Specification calls for, but the time involved for this additional voltage drop is insignificant.

The function of the degraded bus relays are to disconnect the plant from the grid for a sustained degraded condition, i.e., less than 90 percent. voltage for at least.two minutes. They are armed only when the plant is fed from offsite .

power. Plant normal configuration is to be fed from the generator auxiliary transformers except for short periods during startup and shutdown. Therefore, these relays are not normally active during unit operation.

Again, relating to our system studies, we do not believe the shift out of tolerance to be a safety problem for the degraded bus relays. Our studies indicate that the lowest possible offsite voltage to our buses would be 93.3 percent except for the short period during Reactor Coolant Pump (RCP) starting, which is less than one minute. During RCP starting, the bus voltage can dip to 87.3 percent, however, we are protected from an unnecessary trip by the two-minute time delay on this circuit.

N8 C Foun S66A (6$ 91

NRC FORM 366A V.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION (689 I APPROVED OM8 NO, 3I500106 E XP IR ES: A/30/93 LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER) ESTIMATED 8VRDEN PER RESPONSE TO COMPLY WTH THIS INFORMATION COLLECTION REOVEST-, 500 HRS. FORWARD TEXT CONTINUATION COMMENTS REGARDING 8URDEN ESTIMATE TO THE RECORDS AND REPORTS MANAGEMENT BRANCH IP630). U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION. WASHINGTON. DC 30555, AND To 1HE PAPERWORK REDUCTION PROJECT I31504104I, OFFICE OF MANAGEMENTAND 8VDGET,WASHINGTON, DC 30503, FACILITY NAME III DOCKET NUMBER I2/

LER NUMBER IEI PAGE IS)

YEAR ': 9 66QUENNAL NUM668

'".n<Y'6' r' NUM 6 n D. C. COOK NUCLEAR PLANT - UNIT 2 0 5 0 0 0 3 1 8 8 0 3 0 8 0 TEXT /llnuup pnpco /F Puquuud, upp pddnenp/ /YRC %%d 366A 9/ I I TI An engineering review has determined a plus or minus 3 percent tolerance (as opposed to the current 0.5 percent) to be acceptable for the Loss of Voltage application. Most of the calibration history data is within 3 percent of the required setpoint. The few exceptions are considered nqrmal random failures.

The Degraded Voltage application will accept a plus or minus 1.5 percent tolerance. This value is suitable for the installation of more accurate undervoltage relays.

Based on the above, it has been concluded that there is no jeopazdy to the health and safety of the public as a result of this event.

Corrective Action The relays were recalibrated to within the allowable values at the time of discovery during the calibration. An engineering review has determined a plus or minus 3 percent tolerance to be acceptable for the Loss of Voltage application and a plus or minus 1.5 percent tolerance for the Degraded Voltage application. A Technical Specification change request has been submitted. In addition, a Design Change regarding the replacement of the currently installed Degraded Voltage relays with more accurate relays is scheduled to be completed at the next refueling outages for both units. As stated in the original LER, we have increased the calibration frequency from every eighteen months to monthly until the trend indicates a different frequency is justified.

Monthly calibration checks have yielded the following results to date:

4KV Loss of Voltage - 528 calibrations 12.3 percent 65 failures 4KV Degraded Voltage - 264 calibrations 15.5 percent 41 failures Failed Com onent Identification None.

Previous Similar Events LER 316/81-015 LER 316/82-108 LER 315/81-017 LER 315/83-069 LER 315/82-051 L'ER 315/83-094 LER 315/82-059 LER 316/82-100 NRC Form 366A I669)