ML20199G635

Partially Withheld Index of Comanche Peak OL Proceeding

ML20199G635
Person / Time
Site:	Comanche Peak, 05000000
Issue date:	06/11/1986
From:	Rothschild M NRC
To:
Shared Package
ML20197J178	List: IR 05000445/1985009 ML20197J173 ML20197J273 ML20197J296 ML20199G064 ML20199G070 ML20199G083 ML20199G092 ML20199G099 ML20199G107 ML20199G116 ML20199G119 ML20199G124 ML20199G133 ML20199G146 ML20199G154 ML20199G163 ML20199G179 ML20199G212 ML20199G284 ML20199G292 ML20199G298 ML20199G306 ML20199G318 ML20199G331 ML20199G343 ML20199G352 ML20199G363 ML20199G383 ML20199G391 ML20199G402 ML20199G420 ML20199G432 ML20199G442 ML20199G453 ML20199G464 ML20199G575 ML20199G614 ML20199G620 ML20199G624 ML20199G630 ML20199G635 ML20199G641 ML20199G645 ML20199G649 ML20199G655 ML20199G661 ML20199G670 ML20199G675 ML20199G681 ... further results
References
FOIA-85-59 NUDOCS 8606250307
Download: ML20199G635 (54)

Text

i.,

~

.y, IflDEX OF COMANCHE PEAK OPERATING LICENSE PROCEEDING NOTE:

This is an iiidex of the Comanche Peak operating license proceeding, starting with the first prehearing ccnference in May 1979 through the last evidentiary hearing senion in May 1984. Although this index covers conference callr. and limited appearance statements, attached are seperate indexes of tele-phone conference calls and limited appearance statements.

There is a complete set of transcripts in the bookshelves next to our supply closet.

Marjorie Rothschild t

FoIA-85-67 e

v Ig 8606250307 860611 DE 9

.f U

COMANCHE PEAK CONFERENCE CALLS Date Vol.

Pages 3/14/83 21a 1-82 21b 1-132 4/7/83 e

4/25/83 Elc 5784-5854 6/7/83 25b 7486-7535 7/5/83 29a 8620-8683 7/20/83 29b 8684-8721 10/21/83 31a 9076-9134 11/16/83 31b 9135-9206 1/12/84 31c 9207-9256 2/10/84 31d 9257-9298 2/15/84 31e 9299-9336 2/28/84 36a 10,350-10,383 3/30/84 41a 11,999-12.033 4/18/84 41b 12,034-12,137

~

6/28/84 49 13,598-13,679 e

e 4

e O

I

COMANCHE PEAK LIMITED APPEARANCES Date Hame Page 12/1/81 Dr. Ernest L. Buckley ~

90-91 Dr. John Heit 93-95 Joe Paul Jones 96-98 Lawrence Biser 110-115 James B. Davies, Jr.

116-117 Jim Schermbeck 125-130 Lon Burnam 189-194 6/8/82 Lavern Biser 976-983 7/28/82 h

2718 6

2720-2727 9/15/82 Bob Bronson 4845-4852 Betty Brink 4855-4859 James Yost 4861-4865 Michael Chandler 4866-4877 9/16/82 Dennis Culton 5551-5559 5/16/83 Earl H. Burnnam 6096 Karen Chandler 6099 Dennis Danvers 6101 Sally Sutton 6105 Mavis Belisle 6109 Jay Gavit 6112 Darryl Pendleton 6116 Simon Cornell 6119 Jim Schermbeck 6123 Lawrence Kaster 6151 Priscilla Reznikoff 6133 Betty Brink 6133 Bonnie Coatney 6142 Lonnie Oglesby 6144 Charles Foster 6146 Marshall Gilmore 6154 Suzi Foster 6161 Bucky Irwin 6164 3/20/84 6

~

10,915 3/21/84 6

11,192-11,193 3/22/84 6 (" Sworn Statement")

11,351 11,528-11,532

i _ _

~

~

INDEX OF COMANCHE PEAK TESTIMONY Date Vol.

Subject Pages Exhibits 5/22/79 1

Pre-hearing Conference 1-133 4/30/80 2

Pre-hearing Conference 134-361 5/1/80 3

Pre-hearing Conference 362-534 12/1/81 4

Pre-hearing Conference 1-279 Limited Appearances DR. ERNEST L. BUCKLEY 90-91 DR. JOHN G. HEIT 93-95 J0E PAUL JONES 96-98 LAVERNE BISER 110-115 JAMES B. DAVIES, JR.

116-117 JIM SCHERMBECK 125-130 LON BURNAM 189-194 12/2/81 5

280-560 EVIDENTIARY HEARING BEGINS 285 Staff Documents Admitted Into Evidence

1) SER (SX1) Admitted 291 SX1-Tr. 291

2) SER Supp. (SX2) Admitted 291 SX2-Tr. 291 3)

FES (SX3) Admitted 291 SX3-Tr. 291 CONTENTION 25 (Financial Quali-295-502 fications)

Staff l.

U1M PETERSON 301-380 SX4-Tr. 381 Qualif. & testimony (SX4) after Tr. 301 Direct examination 295-307 Cross-examination 307-369 Recirect 369-372 l

Board Examination.

372-380 PETERSON excused 380 l

Ap)1icants l

)anel of NVE, FARRELL WERt(ER, 385-505 l

SCHMIDT i

AX1 (Estimated Annual Opera-AX1-Tr. 392 ting Costs, Comanche Peak l

Unit No. 1 for 1985; and Units 1 & 21986-1991) l AX2 (Application for OL) 396 AX2-Tr. 396 AX3 (FSAR & amendments) 398 AX3-Tr. 398 AX4 (Environmental Report-OL 400 AX4-Tr. 400 Stage)

I

~

I 3

Date Vol.

Subject Pages-Exhibits s

12/2/81 5

AX5 (Testimony of NYE) 405 AX5-Tr. 405 AX6 (Tabulated data on site 407 AX6-Tr. 407 cases decided since 1976)

AX7 (Tabulation of Financial 408 AX7-Tr. 408 indicators on TUGC0 & subsi-diaries)

Applicants' Direct Examination 384-408 Cross-Examination 409-489 Redirect Examination 489-491 Board Examination 491-505 Applicants' panel excused 502 BOARD QUESTION 2 (OPERATING 506-662 QA PROGRAM) 506-641 Applicants' Panel of JONES, VEGA, CHAPMAN & DEVINEY Clements Qualif.

507 Chapman Qualif.

509 Vega Qualif.

511 Jones Qualif.

513 i

Deviney Qualif.

516 Clements Dir. Testimony (AX8) 519 AX8-Tr. 519 Chapman Direct Testimony 522 AX9-Tr. 522 (AX9)

Jones Direct Testimony 527 AX10-Tr. 527 (AX10)

AX11 (" Operations Adminis-AX11-Tr. 529 trative Control & QA Plan")

Vega Direct Testimony (AX12) 531 AX12-Tr. 531 Cross-examination 536-556 i

Board examination 556-560

(

Hearing session adjourned 560 End of Vol. 5 560 12/3/81 6

561-681 Hearing reconvened 565 Applicants' Panel of JONES, 565-643 VEGA, CHAPMAN, & DEVINEY i

(resumed)

Board Examination (continued) 565-640 Redirect Examination 641-642 Recross Examination 642-643 CFUR 642-643 i

Applicants' Panel excused 644 I

e b

I s

l

. o 1

I 4

Date Vol.

Subject Pages Exhibits 12/3/81 6

Staff 644-662 NTC Itaff witness SPRAUL SX5-Tr. 645 j

Direct Testimony (SX-5),

i after p.645 Direct examination 644-653 Cross-examination 653-656 Board examination 656-661 Re-direct examination 661-662 NRC Staff witness SPRAUL excused 662 Hearing session adjourned 681 End of Vol. 6 6B1 6/7/82 7

682-969 Prehearing Conference 687-718 EVIDENTIARY HEARING SESSION 718 BEGINS BOARD QUESTION 1 (Handling hydro-730-731 gen gas in the containment)

BX1 - Applicants' Affidavit, BX1-Tr. 781 4/19/82 (w. Attachments A-F)

NRC Staff Responses, 5/7/82 (Affidavits of DAVID SHUM and ROBERT PALLA)

DELETION OF BORON INJECTION TANK 734-784 Apolicants 734-770 Janel of OSBORNE, MADDEN 734-770 Osborne Qualif. (AX14) 737 AX14-Tr. 737 admitted Madden Qualif. (AX15) 739 AX15-Tr. 739 admitted Direct Testimony 739-743 Cross-examination 744-747 Board examination 747-759 Redirect examination 753-761 Recross-examination 767-770 Panel of OSBORNE MADDEN 770 excused Staff 772-783 Witness SAMMY DIAB Direct Examination 772-777 Board Examination 777-780 Direct Testimony (BX2) (ff.

BX2-Tr. 781 Tr. 781)

Recross Examination 782-783 s

I l

~

a l

4 P_ ales _

Exhibits D,ay Vol.

Subject a

1 6/7/82 7

CONTENTION 5 (Construction QA/QC)

Rock Overbreak & Shrinkage Cracks 784-1401

~

Applicants 784-1259 Panel of MASON,liERRITT, 789-1259 SCHEPPLE, MCGRANE, TOLSON

~

Direct Examinatlon 790-915 Professional qualif. of 792 AX16-Tr. 792 Mason (AX16)

Professional qualif. of 794 AX17-Tr. 794 Merritt (AX17)

Professional qualif. of 796 AX18-Tr. 796 McGrane (AX18)

Professional qualif. of 798 AX19-Tr. 798 Schepple (AX19)

Professional qualif. of 799 AX20-Tr. 799 l

Tolson (AX20)

AX21 (Drawing RV Sections and AX21-Tr. 899 Detail SH.2)

AX22 (Drawing R0 Sections and AX22-Tr. 899 Details, Section 1)

AX23 (RB Internal Structures AX23-Tr. 899 E1.808 feet, zero inches outline)

Cross-examination 915-1123 Staff 915-916 i

CASE 916-985 l

CX4 (TXX-667, 2/4/75, to NRC)

CX4-Tr. 925 CXS (Memo to Mason,

Subject:

CX5-Tr. 938 Blast Overbreak in Containments and Fuel Bldg.

Excavations) l AX24 (940)

CX6 (Letter from Caudel to CX6-Tr. 943 I

Madsen)

CX7 (Construction Drawing)

CX7-Tr. 1021 CX8 (B&R NCR)

CX8-Tr. 965 CX9 (B&R QA NCR (C650R1))

CX9-CX10 (B&R QA NCR) (6/19/78, CX10-C650R1)

CX11 (B&R QA NCR, C650R2, CX11-6/11/78)

CX12 (B&R QA NCR, C650R3, C12-l l

6/19/78)

L Hearing, session adjourned 969 End of Vol. 7 969 i

e i

e

~

t

~

^

_~

i 0

1 5-Date Vol.

Subject Pages Exhibits 6/8/82 8

970-1219 1

Hearing session reconvened 975 i

Limited Appearance of LAVERN 976-983 BISER F

Cross Examination of 985-1123 CX13-Tr. 1015 Applicants' Panel of MASON, MERRITT, SCHEPPLE, MCGRANE, and TOLSON (resumed) (CASE)

CX13 (B&R CPSES concrete pourcard) l CX14 (B&R Office Memo, 2/5/75)

CX15 (Letter, 3/6/75, from 01 CX15-Tr. 1052 to TUGCO)

AX26 (Letter, from TUGC0 to AX26-Tr. 1055 RIV re Report 75-05)

AX27 (Letter, 6/4/75, from AX27-Tr. 1058 NRC.RIV to TUGCO, in response to AX26)

CX16 (Letter, AEC, RIV, CX16-Tr. 1061 1/8/75)

AX24 (Additional 3 pages to AX24-Tr. 1062 CX5)

End of cross-examination 1123 CX17A-17Y CX17A-17Y-Tr. 1128 CX18B-CX18G Tr. 1128 Redirect examination 1123-1124 Recross examination 1123-1172 CX19-Tr. 1130 CX19 CX20 CX20-Tr. 1142 i

CX21 CX21-Tr. 1143 L'

CX22 CX22-Tr. 1143 CX23 thru 26 CX23 '

Tr. 1144 CX27 thru 29 CX27,

Tr. 1145 l '.

CX30 thru 33

.CX30 L Tr. 1146 1:

CX34 CX34-Tr. 1149 l,

CX35 CX35-Tr. 1151

}

CX36 CX36-Tr. 1152 if l;

Board Examination 1172-1219 4

Hearing, session adjourned 1219

?

End of Vol. 8 1219 1

1 8

' Date Vol.

Subject Pages Exhibits 6/9/82 9

1220-1480 Hearing Resumes 1225 Apslicants' Panel of MASON, 1229-1259 4ERRITT, SCHEPPLE, MCGRANE,

& TOLSON (resumed)

Redirect Examination 1229-1241 Cross Examination

+

CASE 1241-1259 AX28 (CP35-1195-CCP-25, AX28-Tr. 1231 Rev. O. Blasting for Plant Structures, 11/28/74)

AX29 (CP35-1195-CCP-25, AX29-Tr. 1231 Rev. 1, Blasting for Plant Structures & SSI Dam, 1/24/75)

AX30 (Interoffice Memo to AX30-Tr. 1231 Randall Taylor from J. P.

Clark, III,

Subject:

Procedure / Interaction Voiding,1/28/80)

AX31 (Excavation for Plant AX31-Tr. 1234 Specification No. 2323-55-6, 10/31/74, Rev. 0)

AX32 (Excavation for Plant AX32-Tr. 1234 i

Structures, Specification 2323-S5-6, Rev. 1)

AX33 (Excavation for Plant AX33-Tr. 1234 Structures, Specification 2323-55-6, Rev. 2)

AX34 (Procedure No. QAP-10, AX34-Tr. 1235 Geologic Evaluations, Rev. O, 9/6/74) i AX35 (Quality Control Procedure,

.AX35-Tr. 1239 CP-QCP-21, Plant Site Rock Blasting Surveillance, 7/14/75)

(

AX36 (Quality Control Procedure, AX36-Tr. 1239 CP-QCP-2.1, Plant Site Rock Blasting Surveillance, 7/14/75) l AX37 (Ltr. to Perry G. Pritlain, AX37-Tr. 1239 TUGCO, from NRC RIV, 7/16/75)

Applicants' Panel excused 1259 0

Staff 1260-1401 F'

Panel of WILLIAM CROSSMAN, 1260-1401 ROBERT STEWART, JOSEPH TAPIA

& ROBERT TAYLOR s

I!

2 4

s*

I

- j i

Date Vol.

Subject Pages Exhibits i

6/9/82 9

Direct Examination 1261-1301 SX6 (Crossman Statement of SX6-Tr. 1262 Prof.Qualif.)

SX7(StewartStatementof SX7-Tr. 1264 Prof. Qualif.)

SX8 (Tapia Statement of SX8-Tr. 1266 Prof. Qualif.)

SX9 (Taylor Statement of SX9-Tr. 1267 Prof. Qualif.)

SX10 (Letter fm. NRC RIV to Applicants,4/22/75)

SX11 (ISE Report 75-06)

SX12 (ISE Report 75-07)

Cross-Examination 1302-1371 CASE 1302-1311 AX38 (R.B. Internal Structure, Reactor Cavity, Reinforced (abbreviated) Sections and DETS,SH.I.)

Applicants 1313 CASE (JORDAN) 1323-1371 CX38 (NCR C650, 4-7-77)

CX38-Tr. 1349 Redirect Examination 1372-1388 Recross Examination 1380-CASE 1388-1390 Board Examination 1390-1401 End of Rock Overbreak &

1401 Shrinkage Cracks l

FURTHER TESTIMONY ON CONTENTION 5 1401-2146 (QA/QC Organization at Comanche Peak; Comanche Peak QA Program Satisfaction of 10 C.F.R. Part 50 Appendix B; Disposition of I&E Reports; ASME Survey of Brown & Root at Comanche Peak; Brown & Root Response to ASME Survey)

Applicarits 1401-1710; Panel of DAVID N. CHAPMAN, 1738-1757; RONALD G. TOLSON, ANTONIO 1771-1904; VEGA, RAYMOND J. VURPILLAT, 1927-2146 ROGER F. REEDY and SUSAN L.

9 SPENCER i

Direct Examination 1401-1450 i

1!

)

l 4

i

. Ifj Date Vol.

Subject Pages Exhibits i

6/9/82 9

Prof. Qualif. of Spencer (AX39)

AX39-Tr. 1407 Prof. Qualif. of Vurpillat (AX40)

.sx40-Tr. 1407 Prof. Qualif. of Reedy (AX41)

AX41-Tr. 1408 Testimony of CHAPMAN (AX42)

AX42-Tr. 1412 (QA/QC Organiz. of C. Peak during Construction Phase)

Project QA organiz. for C. Peak AX42A-Tr. 1413 (AX42A),1413 TUGC0/TUSI Home Office & C. Peak AX42B-Tr. 1414 Field Organiz. (AX42B), 1414 Gibbs & Hill Organization (AX42C),

AX42C-Tr. 1415 1415 B&R QA Organiz. chart (AX42D).

AX420-Tr. 1417 1417 Testimony of VEGA (AX43)

AX43-Tr. 1419 (Regarding C. Peak QA Program Satisfaction of 10 C.F.R. Part 50, Appendix B) (CPSES QA Plan)

AX43A-Tr. 1420 (AX43A) (CPSES QA Plan AX43B-Tr. 1422 ComplianceMatrix)(AX43B)

Testimony of SPENCER (AX44)

AX44-Tr. 1426 (Disposition of NRC I&E Reports)

AX44A AX44A-Tr. 1427 AX44B AX44B-Tr. 1427 AX44C AX44C-Tr. 1428 AX44D AX440-Tr. 1429 AX44E AX44E-Tr. 1429 i

AX44F AX44F-Tr. 1430 l

AX44G AX44G-Tr. 1431 i

AX44H l

AX44H-Tr. 1431 Testimony of VURPILLAT (AX45)

AX45-Tr. 1435 (B&R Response to ASME Survey

& Resurvey)

Attachments AX45A AX45A-Tr. 1437 AX45B AX458-Tr. 1437 Testimony of REEDY (AX46)

AX46-Tr. 1439 (ASME Survey of B&R at I

l; C. Peak) (AX46A) i: (AX43B)

AX43B-Tr. 1440 4

AX47 (1440)

AX47-Tr. 1443 AX48.(Lobbin Report), 1440 AX48-Tr. 1443 AX49 (1441)

AX49-Tr. 1444 AX50 AX50-Tr. 1445 1

Hearing session adjourned 1480 i

End of Vol. 9 1480 1

j 1

' i t

a

,' Date Vol.

Subject Pages Exhibits 1

6/10/82 10 1481-1757 Hearing reconvened 1486 CX39 (1547)

CX39-withdrawn Tr. 1581 CX40 (1549)

CX40-Tr. 1593 Cross-Examination 1552-1706; 1738-1757 CASE 1552-1706; 1738-1757 CX41A (1549)

CX41A-Tr. 1597 CX41B (1552)

CX41B-Tr. 1597 CX41C (1554 CX41C-Tr. 1597 CX41D (1555 CX410-Tr. 1597 o

CX41E (1555 CX41E-Tr. 1597 CX42 1556)

CX42-Tr. 1605 CX43 1557)

CX43-Tr. 1612 CX44 (1557)

CX44-Tr. 1616 CX39A(1562)

CX45A(1582)

CX45A-Tr. 1592 CX45B (1583)

CX45B-Tr. 1592 CX45C (1585)

CX45C-Tr. 1592 CX450(1586)

CX450-Tr. 1592 CX45E (1586)

CX45E-Tr. 1592 CX42A (1598)

CX42A-Tr. 1605 CX42B(1599)

CX42B-Tr. 1605 CX42C (1599)

CX42C-Tr. 1605 CX43-A (1609 CX43A-Tr. 1612 CX43-B (1609 CX438-Tr. 1612 il CX44-A(1613 CX44A-Tr. 1612 CX44-B (1613)

CX44B-Tr. 1616 CX44-C(1613)

CX44C-Tr. 1616 CX46 (1623)

CX46-Tr. 1644 CX47 (1625)

CX47-A(1626)

CX47-B (1626)

CX47-C (1626)

CX47-D (1627)

CX48 (1627)

CX48A(1628)

CX48B (1628)

CX48C (1628)

L CX49 (1629) l!

CX49-A (1630) l' CX49-B (1630)

L, CX49-C(1631) b CX49-D (1632)

[

CX49-E (1632)

F ll

=

l

~

t b

Date Vol.

Subject Pages Exhibits

'[

6/10/82 10 CX49-F (1632)

AX50 (1632 AX51(1647 Tr. 1647 AX52 (1649 Tr. 1651 4

AX53 (1746)

Applicants' Witness BIELFELDT -

1650-1710 rr. AX51 (TUGC0 NCR trend categories)

I.irect Examination 1650-1652

,tross Examination 1652-1710 Staff Witness ROBERT TAYLOR 1711-1738

-(Te~gardingpuposeof i

QA/QC program Direct Examination 1711-1713 Board Examination 1713-1717 cross Examination 1717-1725 CASE 1/17-1725 L

Board Examination 1725-1736 Recross Examination 1736-1738 CASE 1736-1738 Witness TAYLOR excused 1738 i

Apalicants' Panel of 1738-1757 CHAPMAN, TOLSON, VEGA, t

VURPILLAT, REEDY, SPENCER, BIELFELDT (resumed)

I Cross-Examination (cont'd) 1738-1757 Hearing session adjourned 1757 End of Vol. 10 1757 6/11/82 11 1758-1904 Applicants' Panel of CHAPMAN, 1771-1904 TOLSON, VEGA, VURPILLAT, REEDY, SPENCER, BIELFELDT (resumed)

Cross Examination (resumed) 1771-1904 CX51-70 (1775)

CX51-Tr. 1775 CX71-105 (1782)

CX71-105-Tr. 1782 CX106-172 (1827)

CX106-172-Tr. 1827 CX164-169 Withdrawn -

Tr. 1840.

l CX173,187 (1862)

CX173-187-Tr. 1862 L --

J.]

i Date Vol.

Subject Pages Exhibits -

6/11/82 11 CX188(1066)

CX188-Tr. 1867 CX189 (1807)

CX1897 1

Hearing session adjourned 1904 End of Vol. 11 1904 7/26/82 12 1905-2307 q

CX37 (1913)

CX37-Tr. 1913 Applicants' panel of TOLSON, 1927-2146 CHAPMAN, SPENCER, VURPILLAT, i

VEGA (resumed)

Cross-Examination (resumed) 1927-2103 CASE 1927-2103 l

CX495(2003)

CX495-Tr. 2003 CX571(2003)

AX54 thru 116 (2104)

AX54 thru 116-Tr. 2104 Redirect Examination 2104-2115 Recross Examination 2115-2123 CASE 2115-2123 E

Board Examination 2123-2146 AX25-A thru 25-0 (2137)

AX25-A thru 25-D (Tr. 2137)

Applicants' panel excused 2146 CONTENTION 5 (continued) -

2147-2200 LOBBIN REPORT S

Applicants 2147-2200 Panel of CLEMENTS, LOBBIN, 2147-2200 CHAPMAN & VEGA Direct Examination 2147-2153 AX117 (2148 AX117-Tr. 2149 AX118 (2150 AX118-Tr. 2150 AX119 (2152 AX119-Tr. 2152 a

Cross-Examination 2154-2173 1

CASE 2154-2173 Redirect Examination 2174-2175

?

Board Examination 2175-2197 l

Applicants' panel excused 2197 CONTENTION 5 (continued) -

f Applicants' Panel of MERRITT, 2201 TOL5ON, CHAPMAN, SCHEPPELE,

}

MCGRANE, BOREN & BARBER (re Atchison allegations on moment y

limiting restraints, pipe whip l

restraints, shims in polar 8

crane girder support bracket assemblies)

j Date Vol.

Subject Pages Exhibits 7/26/82 12 Direct Examination 2201-2215 AX120 (2202)

AX120-Tr. 2203 AX121 (2204)

AX121-Tr. 2204 AX122, 122-A thru 122-M AX122, 122-A (2205) thru 122-M (Tr. 2206)

AX123(2207)

AX123-Tr. 2207 AX124 (2207)

AX124-Tr. 2209 AX125 (2209)

AX125-Tr. 2210 AX126(2210)

AXI26-Tr. 2211 AX127, 127-A thru 127-1 AX127, 127-A (2212) thru 127-I-Tr. 2213 AX128(2213)

AX128-Tr. 2214 Cross-Examination 2215-2261 CASE 2215-2281 Redirect Examination 2281-2296 Recross Examination 2296-2297 CASE 2296-2297 Board Examination 2297-2307 Hearing session adjourned 2307 End of Vol. 12 2307 7/27/82 13 2308-2706 CONTENTION 5 (continued) -

2312-2452 NRC STAFF ROLE DURING j

CONSTRUCTION AND RESULTS OF STAFF INSPECTIONS AND INVESTI-

?

GATIONS:

Staff Panel of I

CROSSMAN,3TEWKRT, TAYLOR Direct Examination 2312-2336 h

SX13, 13A thru 178 (2315)

SX13, 13A thru 178-Tr. 2336 SX180, 181 thru 196 (2320)

Tr. 2336 L

Cross Examination 2336-2435 b

Applicants 2336-2343

~

l CASE 2334-2435 CX300(2387)

CX304 (2389)

Redirect Examination 2436-2437 Boar & Examination 2438-2452 s

Staff witnesses CROSSMAN &

' 2452 STEWART excused i

I 1

Date Vol.

Subject Pages Exhibits -

1 7/27/82 13 CONTENTION 5 (continued) - NRC 2453-2506; Staff Panel of DONALD DRITitTLL 2516-2706 T RUFERT TAYLOR (re Atchison allegations)

Direct Examination 2453-2461 i

SX197 (2461 SX197-Tr. 2461 SX198 (2456 SX198-Tr. 2456 SX199 (2461 SX199-Tr. 2461 Cross Exa:nination Applicants 2461-2462 i

CASE 2463-2469 Board questioning (re identity 2469-2506 ofinformers)

Staff Panel excused 2506 Applicants' Witness TOLSON 2508-2513 (re identify of Staff informers)

Staff panel of TAYLOR &

2516-2706 DRISKILL recalled Cross-Examination (continued) 2516-2599 CASE 2516-2599 Redirect Examination 2600-2604 Recross Examination 2604 Applicants 2604-2605 Board Examination 2605-2692 Recross Examination Applicants 2692-2700 CASE 2700-2706 Staff Panel excused 2706 7/28/82 14 2707-3035 Hearing resumed 2711 limited A earance of 2718 (ff. Tr. 2718)

Limited A earance of 2720-2727 (ff. Tr. 2727)

Evidentiary Hearing resumes 2729 e

l Discussion re identity of 2729-2736 i

Staff informants CX651; CX651A; 651B CX651; CX651A; il (Tr. 2742)

CX6518-3 Tr. 2924 CONTENT' ION 5 (continued) -

CASE WITNESSES RE VARIOUS ALLEGED DEFICIENCIES IN s

COMANCHE PEAK CONSTRUCTION:

JOHN JUNIOR GATES 2752-2906 i

Date Vol.

Subject

_Pages Exhibits 7/28/82 14 STANLEY G. MILES 2752; 2777-2782; 2782-2786 CX651(C) (2753)

CX651C-Tr. 2924 Direct Examination of GATES 2752-2755 Voir Dire Examination of GATES 2756-2777 Applicants 2756-2777 Further Direct Examinatinn 2777-2782 (GATES & MILES)

CX655(2779)

CX655-Tr. 2779 CX657 (2779)

CX657-Tr. 2985 Voir Dire of MILES 2782-2786 Cross-Examination of GATES 2786-2862 Applicants 2786-2859 Board Exhibit 4 (2828)

BX4-Tr. 2829 Staff 2859-2862 Redirect Examination 2862-2879 Recross Examination 2879-2885 Applicants 2879-2881 Staff 2881-2885 Board Examination 2885-2904 Witness GATES excused 2906 MILES (resumed) 2926-2985 Cross Examination 2926-2978 Applicants 2926-2978 Board Examination 2978-2985 Witness MILES excused 2985 CONTENTION 5 (continued) -

Applicants' Rebuttal of GATES & MILES Panel of SCHEPPELE, MCGRANE, 2987-3000

& MERRITT Direct Examination 2987-2992 Cross Examination 2992-2994 CASE 2992-2994 l

Board Examination 2994-3000 Applicants' panel excused 3000 CX518, 519, 485, 534, 524, 514, 484, 483, 482, 479, 478, 364 (3007)

Staff Witness CROSSMAN (re 3021-3024 whether Statf follows up on NCRs)

Hearing session adjourned 3035 End of Vol. 14 3035 i

O

,e t*

i Date Vol.

Subject Pages Exhibits 7/29/82 15 3036-3341 Hearing resumes 3041 3

Discussion re identity of 3041-3073 confidential informants J

CONTENTION 5 (continued) -

I CASE witness 6 3074-3197

~

1 Direct Examination 3074-3084 CX659 (213) (3074)

Tr. 3198 CX659A (214) (3075)

Tr. 3195 CX659B (215 (3075)

Tr. 3198 CX659C (216 (3075)

Tr. 3198 3

CX659D (217 (3076)

Tr. 3198 i

CX659E (218 (3076)

Tr. 3198 CX659F (219 3076 Tr. 3198 CX659G (220 3077 Tr. 3198 l

CX659H (221) 3077 Tr. 3198 Voir Dire Examination 3084-3089 1

Applicants 3084-3089 8

Cross-Examination 3090-3173 Applicants (SCHEPPELE) 3090-3173 l

AX129 (3127)

AX129-Tr. 3198 Redirect Examination 3174-3186

'l Board Examination 3176-3197 1

j' CONTENTION 5 (continued) -

CASE Witness N 3199-3468 J:

DTRict Examination 3199-3210 1

Cross Examination 3211-3341 l

Applicants 3211-3341 1

AX130 (3225)

AX130-Tr. 3269

]

AX131 (3225)

AX131-Tr. 3269 l1 AX132 (3269)

AX132-Tr. 3384

'l AX133 (3273)

AX133-Tr. 3384 i

AX134 (3279)

AX134-Tr. 3384 l!

AX135 (3305 AX135-Tr. 3384 AX136 3334 AX136-Tr. 3384 AX137 3337 AX137-Tr. 3384 Hearing session adjourned 3341 1

End of Volume 15 3341 fil 7/30/82 16 3342-3563 i

Hearing resumed 3346 Cross-Examination (of 3349-3413 J

3349-3388

]

CX662- (248) (3383)

CX662(248)-

,Tr. 3383

]

1 l

=

1 1 Date Vol.

Subject Pages Exhibits 7/30/82 16 Staff 3388-3413 Beard Exhibit 5A and 5B (3385)

BX5A & 5B-Tr. 3385 Redirect Examination 3413-3436 CX665A (249) thru 665(D) (253)

CX665A(249) i (3419) thru 665(D) l (253)-Tr. 3458 CX663 (254) (3429)

CX663(254)-

Tr. 3468 CX664 (255) (3431)

CX664(255)-

Tr. 3433 Recross Examin'ation 3436-3441 Applicants 3426-3441 Board Examination 3441-3468 CX650 (256), 650A thru 650X CX650(256),

i (280), CX656 (281) 650A thru 650X(280),

CX656(281)-

4 Tr. 3468 Witness AT g excused 3468 CASE Witnesses ROBERT &

3470 l

7 RDELLA HAMILTON Direct Examination 3471-3489 CX652 (282) (3471)

CX652(282)-

Tr. 3528 CX653 (283) (3482)

CX653(283)-

Tr. 3528 j

CX653A thru 653F (289) (3488)

CX653A thru 653F (289)-

j

]

Tr. 3528 Cross Examination 3489-3517 Applicants 3489-3517 AX132-137 AX132-137-

]

Tr. 3384

?

AX138 (3499)

AX138-Tr. 3529

)?

AX139 (3501)

AX139-Tr. 3529 j

AX140 (3515)

AX140-Tr. 3529 4

Staff 3517-3519 k

Redirect Examination 3519-3520 Board Examination 3520-3524 1

Recross Examination 3524 j

Board Examination 3514-3529 s

CASE witnesses C. & R. HAMILTON 3529 j

excused 8

j Hearing session adjourned 3563 End of Vol.16 3563

?

l s

_=

..s.

. Date Vol.

Subject Pages Exhibits-i 9/13/82 17 3564-4445 Hearing resumes 3568 f

CASE witness W 3611-3615 g

(recalled)

I Direct Examination 3611-3612

~

CX668 (3612)

CX668-Tr. 3615 l

Cross Examination 3614-3615 6

Staff 3614-3615 CASE witness e excused 3615 CASE Witness JACK 00YLE 3622-4012 U 6ii9, 669A and 669B (3630)

Tr. 3630 r

00YLE Deposition 3631-4011 Exhibits to Doyle Deposition No. 1 (3638)

Tr. 3638 No. 2 (3712)

Tr. 3712 No. 3A through 3C (3721)

Tr. 3721 f

No. 4A through 4T (3725)

Tr. 3725 No. 5A through SC (3736)

Tr. 3736 No. 6A thourgh 6F (3742)

Tr. 3742 No. 7A through 7D (3749)

Tr. 3749 No. 8A through 8W (3752)

Tr. 3752 No. 9A through 9HH (3772)

Tr. 3772 No. 10A through 10R (3785)

Tr. 3785 j

No. 11A through 11BBB (3796)

Tr. 3796 No. 12A through 12P (3819)

Tr. 3819 No. 13A through 13MMM (3828)

Tr. 3828 No. 14A through 14M (3845)

Tr. 3845 No. 15A through 15D (3847)

Tr. 3847 No. 16A through 16C (3850)

Tr. 3850 No. 17A through 17W (3854)

Tr. 3854 No. 18 (3854)

Tr. 3854 No.19Athrough19B(3858)

Tr. 3858 No. 20A through 20M (3858)

Tr. 3858 No. 21 (3858)

Tr. 3858 No. 22 (4009)

Tr. 4009 00YLE temporarily excused 4011 CASE Witnesses HENRY & DARLENE 4014-4369 (4015) (4125-4198)

CX667-Tr. 4124 Direct Examination 4014-4026 CX667A thru 5571 (4019)

CX666 (4021)

CX666-Tr. 4021 CX666A (4023) (4203-4254)

CX666A-Tr. 4202 CX6668 thru 666D (4024)

CX666B thru 666D-Tr. 4202

' Cross Examination 4026-4069 Applicants 4026-4037 e

i

, Date Vol.

Subject Paggs Exhibits ~

9/13/82 17 Staff 4037-4009 Redirect Examination 4069-4071 Recross Examination 4071-4076 f

Applicants 4071-4076 i

Board Examination 4076-4117 l

Further Redirect Examination 4117-4119 CX667W-1 thru 667W-4 CX667W-1 thru 667W-4 rejected at Tr. 4122 CX667W-5 thru 667W-13 CX667W-5 thru 667W Tr. 4123 CX661, 661A, 661B, 661C CX661, 661A, 661B, 661C-Tr. 4268 4

(withdrawn)

CX667 4125-4198 CX666 4203-4254 CX666A 4255-4267 Cross-Examination 4268-4325 Applicants 4268-4289 Staff 4289-4291 Applicants (continued) 4291-4305 Staff (continued) 4305-4325 Further Redirect Examination 4326-4328 Further Recross Examination 4329-4355 Board Examination 4355-4369 STINERS temporarily excused 4369 CASE witness N 4378-4386

- UTrect Examination 4378-4386 Ap)licants' Witnesses BRANDT, 4387-4445 i.;

'URDY, SMITH, TOLSON, and VURPILLAT (Rebuttal of Atchison)

Direct Examination 4388-4415 AX141B (4390 AX141B-Tr. 4390 AX141A (4391 AX141A-Tr. 4391 AX141C (4393 AX141C-Tr. 4391 AX141 (4394)

AX141-Tr. 4655 AX141D(4400 AX1410-Tr. 4400 AX141E (4401 AX141E-Tr. 4401 AX141F 4402 AX141G 4402 Tr. 4410 AX141H 4403 Tr. 4410 AX141J 4404)

Tr. 4410 AX141K(4404)

Tr. 4410 4

~

1

. b I

Date Vol.

Subject Pages Exhibits -

9/13/82 17 AX141L (4405)

Tr. 4410 AX141M (4405 Tr. 4410 AX141N (4406 Tr. 4410 AX1410 4406 Tr. 4410 AX141P 4406 Tr. 4410 AX1410 4406 Tr. 4410

].'

AX141R 4407 Tr. 4410 AX1415 (4407 Tr. 4410 AX141T (4407)

Tr. 4410 AX141U (4403)

Tr. 4410 AX141V(4408)

Tr. 4410 AX141W (4409)

Tr. 4410 Cross Examination 4416-4445 CASE 4416-4445 t,x681(4435 CX679 (4435 CX682 (4435 CX670 (4435)

CX680 (4435)

Hearing session adjourned 4445 End of Volume 17 4445 9/14/82 18 4446-4837 Hearing resumes 4450 CX684 (4456)

CX684 CX684A(4456)

CX684A-Tr. 4456 i

CASE witnes g(resumed) 4457-4460 cross-Exami tion

, resumed) 4457-4460 h

Appltcants 4457-4460 p

CASE witness 4478-4490 l

(recalled) lt Further Cross-Examination 4481-4490 Applicants 4481-4490 AX145 (4483)

AX145-Tr. 4490 1

AX146 (4488)

AX146-Tr. 4490 l

Redirect Examination 4490-4491 j}

Applicants' Witnesses BRANDT,-

4492-4653 TOLSON, PURDY, VURPILLAT, d

SMITH (recalled) l Cross-Examination (continued) 4492-4628 4

CASE 4492-4628 1

CX688 (4502)

CX688-Tr. 4699 L

CX686 (4495)

CX685, 686-CX685 (4496)

Tr. 4697 (withdrawn)

I l

Date Vol.

Subject Pages Exhibits -

9/14/82 18 AX142F(4583)

Redirect Examination 4628-4329 Recross Examination 4630 Board Examination 4630-4653 CX687 CX687-Tr. 4698 CASE Witness JACK D0YLE 4705-4756 (recalled)

Direct Examination 4706-4714 CX683, 683A thru 683K (4706)

CX683, 683A thru 683K (Tr. 4758)

Cross-Examination 4714-4729 Applicar.ts 4714-4727 Staff 4727-4729 Board Examination 4729-4756 00YLE excused 4756 Ap)licants' witnesses SCHEPPELE, 4768-4837 lEEDY, CHANG, FINNERAN, KRISHNAN (rebuttal of Walsh/Doyle)

Direct Examination 4768-4837 AX142 (4779)

AX142-Tr. 4794 AX142B(4773)

AX1428-Tr. 4794 AX142A (4779)

AX142A-Tr.,4794 AX1420 4780 AX142D-Tr. 4794 AX142E 4784 AX142E-Tr. 4794 AX142F 4784 AX142F-Tr. 4794 Hearing session adjourned 4837 End of Volume 18 4837 9/15/82 19 4838-5178 Hearing resumes 4843 Limited appearances 4845-4878 B0B BRONSON 4845-4852 BETTY BRINK 4855-4859 JANIS YOST 4861-4865 MICHAEL CHANDLER (letter 4866-4877 j

submitted by CASE) s Ap)licants' witnesses SCHEPPELE, 4878 p

REEDY, CHANG, FINNERAN, KRISHNAN (resumed)

Cross-Examination 4879-5174

~

CASE -,, ~ ~J )

4879-5174 0

l l

^

l i

j l

. 3, Date Vol.

Subject Pages Exhibits 1

l 9/15/82 19 CX690 (5024)

CX690-Tr. 5165 CX693 (5073)

CX693-Tr. 5166 (rejected)

CX692(5076)

CX692-Tr. 5077 CX707 (5105)

CX707-Tr. 5148 l

CX708 (5108)

CX708-Tr. 5148 CX699 and 700 (5111)

CX699 & 700-Tr. 5114 CX709 (5111 CX709-Tr. 5142 CX710 (5116 CX710-Tr. 5148 CX697 (5131 CX697-Tr. 5168 CX711(5138 CX711-Tr. 5154 CX712 (5149 CX712-Tr. 5149 (withdrawn)

CX702(5151)

CX702-Tr. 5153 CX713 (5158)

CX713-Tr. 5161 CX706 (5168)

CX706-Tr. 5168 CX704 (5169)

CX704-Tr. 5169 Hearing session adjourned 5178 End of Vol. 19 5178 9/16/82 20 5179-5563 Apalicants' witnesses SCHEPPELE, 5183-5305 1EEDY, CHANG, FINNERAN, KRISHNAN (resumed)

Redirect Examination 5183-5206 AX147 (5192)

AX147-Tr. 5306 Recross Examination 5206 I

Staff 5206-5208 CAS @

5208-5230 CX709 CX709-Tr. 5230 (withdrawn Board Examination 5230-5305

j Witnesses excused 5305 Staff witnesses JOSEPH TAPIA 5324-5425 h

P AUL CHEN (rebuttal of 8

Walsh/Doyle)

SX201 (5327)

SX201-Tr. 5332 h

Direct Examination 5326-5356 j

SX201A (5330 SX201A-Tr. 533C h

SX201B (5332 SX201B-Tr. 5332 l

Cross Examination 5360-5384 i

CASE (WALSH) 5360-5384 ll (suspended)

CX300 & 303 (5360)

CX300&303-

j Tr. 5365 1

l

t

.i Date Vol.

Subject Pages Exhibits -

9/16/82 20 CX690 & 708 CX690&708-Tr. 5398 (withdrawn)

~

)

AX148 (5398)

AX148-Tr. 5398 CX711 CX711-Tr. 5399 (withdrawn)

AX149 (5399)

AX149-Tr. 5399 AX150 (5401)

AX150-Tr. 5402 AX151 (5401)

AX151-Tr. 5402 AX147 - supplemented (5406)

TAPIA/CHEN excused 5425 CONTENTION 22 (EMERGENCY PLANNING) 5428-5550 Applicants - Panel of RICHARD A.

5428-5493 JONES, B0BBY T. LANCASTER &

ROGER E. LINNEMAN Direct Examination 5428-5482 AX143B (5429)

AX1438-Tr. 5439 AX143A (5431)

AX143A-Tr. 5439 AX143 (5434)

AX143-Tr. 5439 AX143C (5434)

AX143C-Tr. 5439 AX1430 (5436)

AX1430-Tr. 5439 Cross-Examination 5482 Staff 5475-5482 CASE 5482-5493 j

Panel excused 5493 h

Applicants - Panel of ALTON B.

5494 ARMSTRONG, CLARENCE L. BORN, LARRY J. SKILES & ARTHUR C. TATE J

[

Direct Examination 5494 AX144C (5495)

AX144C-Tr. 5512 AX144A(5496 AX144A-Tr. 5512 AX144D (5498 AX144D-Tr. 5512 AX144B (5500 AX144B-Tr. 5512 AX144 (5501)

AX144-Tr. 5512 AX144E (5508 AX144E-Tr. 5512 AX144F (5509 AX144F-Tr. 5512 AX144G (5510 AX144G-Tr. 5512 AX144H (5511 AX144H-Tr. 5512 Cross-Examination 5533 Staff 5533-5535 CASE 5535-5551

]

Witnesses temporarily excused 5550 Limited Appearance of

~

5551-5559 i

DENNIS CULTON 1

SX201'C (5560)

SX201C-Tr. 5561 Hearing session adjourned 5563 End of Vol. 20 5563 l

l-

a l

t 1

e e

s

. j Date Vol.

Subject Pages Exhibits -

9/17/82 21 5564-5783 h

Hearing resumes 5568-CONTENTION 22 (cont'd)

~

Ap)1icants - Panel of ARMSTRONG, 5568-5664

)

WRN,SKILES, TATE (resumed Cross-Examination (resumed))

i 5568-5640 CASE 5568-5640 CX728,L-1and728,L-2(5581)

CX728L-1 &

728L-2-Tr. 5644 (withdrawn)

CX727 (5588)

CX727-Tr. 5609 CX728A-728K (5613)

CX728A-728K-Tr. 5613 Redirect Examination 5646-5653 AX152 (5650)

AX152-Tr. 5653 AX153 (5651)

AX153-Tr. 5653 Board Examination 5654-5664 Panel excused 5664 Staff - Witness DAVID M. ROHRER 5665-5679 T ect Examination 5665-5669 SX202 (5666)

SX202-Tr. 5679 SX202A(5666)

SX202A-Tr. 5679 Cross Examination 5669-5677 CASE 5669-5677 Redirect Examination 5677-5678 Recross Examination 5678-5679 Witness excused 5679,5780 FEMA - Panel of ALBERT LOOKABAUGH 5696-5743

& JOHN BENTON Direct Examination 5696-5704 SX203 (5698)

SX203-Tr. 5743 SX203A(5698)

SX203A-Tr. 5743 SX2038 (5698)

SX203B-Tr. 5743 Cross Examination 5704-5740 Applicants 5704-5729 CASE 5729-5740 Board Examination 5741-5743 i

Panel Excused 5743 l

AX3 (Amendments) (5763)

AX3(Amend-i ments)-Tr. 5763 l

Hearing session adjourned 5783 End of Volume 21 5783 i

3/14/83 21a Confere,nce Call 1-82 4/7/83 21b Conference Call 1~-132 4/25/83 21c Conference Call 5784-5854

[

p i

.i

~

~

e 24 Date Vol.

Subject Pages Exhibits -

5/16/83 22 5855-6169 1

Hearing Resumes 5860 TREATMENT UNDER ASME BOILER &

5866-6013 PRESSURE VESSEL CODE OF ji STRESSES IN PIPE SUPPORTS e

RESULTING FROM LOCA-INDUCED DIFFERENTIAL THERMAL EXPANSION BETWEEN PIPE SUPPORTS &

CONCRETE STRUCTURE TO WHICH THE PIPE IS ATTACHED (Legal ArgumentandTestimony)

Staff - Staff counsel &

W. PAUL CHEN CASE - MRS. ELLIS, MARK WALSH and

~

J. 00YLE Ap)1icants - Counsel, and

14. VIVIRITO and R. REEDY SX204 (5889)

CX744(ff.5890)

CX767 (ff. 5890)

SX205(5891)

CX743 (ff. 5901)

CX745 (ff. 5901)

Board Statements & Ruling 6009-6013 2

ERROR ALLEGED BY JACK D0YLE 6017-6269 IN APPLICANTS' EQUATION ON

~

UPPER LATERAL RESTRAINT &

MOMENT RESTRAINT Panel of R. REEDY, M. VIVIRIT0, 6017-6269 J. D0YLE, W. PAUL CHEN Direct Examination 6017-6063 CX758 (ff. 6024)

CX758-ff. 6024 CX838 (ff. 6024)

CX838-ff. 6024 CX790, 799, 800, 801, 802, CX790, 799, 803, and 804 (ff. 6030) 800, 801, 802 803, & 804.-

2 ff. 6030 6

AX154 (ff. 6035)

AX154-ff. 6035 j

CX761C (ff. 6051A)

CX761C-ff. 6051A Cross Examination 6064-6195 l

6064-6091 CASE (WAL5H))

Staff (MIZUNO 6091-6092 End of evidentiary hearing on 6092 I

5/16/83 Limited' Appearance Statements 6094-6169 i

EARL H. BURNHAM 6096 KAREN CHANDLER 6099 9

e w

a w

I J-j l

q 1 l

Date Vol.

Subject Pages Exhibits 5/16/83 22 DENNIS DANVERS 6101 q

SALLY SUTTON 6105 s

MAVIS BELISLE 6109 j

JAY GAVIT 6112 DARRYL PENDLETON 6116 SIMON CORNELL 6119 JIM SCHERMBECK 6123 LAWRENCE KASTER 6131 PRISCILLA REZNIK0FF 6133 BETTY BRINK 6133 BONNIE C0ATNEY J-4-1 6142 LONNIE OGLESBY J-4-3 6144 CHARLES FOSTER J-4-5 6146 MARHSAL GILM0RE (J-4-13) 6154 SUZI FOSTER (J-4-20) 6161 BUCKY IRWIN (J-4-23) 6164 5/17/83 23(1) 6170-6286 UPPER LATERAL RESTRAINT (cont'd) 6173-6269 CASE (Doyle) 6173-6177 Panel of REEDY, VIVIRIT0, CHEN, 6178-6269 and D0YLE (cont'd)

Cross-Examination 6178-6195 Redirect Examination 6195-6218 CX840 (ff. 6215)

CX840-ff. 6215 Cross Examination 6218-6269 CX761B (ff. 6223)

CX761B-ff. 6223 CX669B. Item 9Q (ff. 6224)

CX669B, Item 90-ff. 6224 CX839 (ff. 6242)

CX839-ff. 6242 End of consideration of UPPER 6269 LATERAL RESTRAINT I.

CONTENTION 5 (cont'd) - PURPOSE 6270-6301; l.

OF CONSTRUCTION APPRAISAL TEAM 6381-6388 (CAT) REPORT & RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN CAT & SIT REPORTS Staff - Witness BILL BEACH 6282-6301; 6381-6388 Direct Examination 6282-6291 SX206 (6285)

SX206-6285 End of Vol. 23 (I) 6471 1

i:

5/17/83 23(II) CAT & SIT Reports (cont'd) 6289-6388 f.

SX20T (ff. 6289)

SX207-ff. 6289 k

Cross Examination 6291-6293

]

CASE 6291-6293 lt 1

a l-

.s

~

. l 1

I Date Vol.

! Subject Pages Exhibits -

5/17/83 23(11)

Board questions 6294-6301 Applicants' Witness A. VEGA 6303-6380 Direct Examination 6303-6304 AX155 (6303)

AX155-Tr. 6304 Cross Examination (and 6304-6345 i

l Questions by Board)

CASE 6304-6314 Staff 6314-6345 Board Examination 6345-6376 Redirect Examination 6377-6380 Witness VEGA excused 6380 1

Staff Witness BEACH (recalled) 6381-6388 Cross Examination 6381-6388 Witness BEACH excused 6388 CONTENTION 5 (cont'd) - SIT 6339 REPORT Staff - Panel of PAUL CHEN, 6389-7036 T EPH TAPIA, JAI KAJAN, S. BURWELL and ROBERT G. TAYLOR Direct Examination 6389-6407 5X207 iff. 6402)

SX207-ff. 6402 Cross Examination 6408-7014 Applicants 6408-7412 CASE 6412-6471 CX724, 834, 774 (ff. 6471)

Hearing session adjourned 6471 l

End of Vol. 23 (II) 6471 5/18/83 24 6472-6817 Hearing resumes 6475 Staff panel of CHEN, TAPIA, 6475 N AN, BURWELL, TAYLOR (recalled)

Cross-Examination (and Board 6487-6817 Questions)

SX208 (6484), ff. 6485 SX208-Tr. 6485 CX834 CX834-Tr. 6502 CX775 (6568), ff. 6513)

CX775-Tr. 6570 AX156 (6796)

AX156-Tr. 6796 Hearing session adjourned 6817 End of Vol. 24 6817 t

j i

--. - ~

^

1 J

~,

^

27 -

Date Vol.

Subject Pages Exhibits 5/19/83 25 6818-7272 Hearing resumes 6821 Staff Panel of CHEN, TAPIA, 6823-7036 N AN, BURWELL TAYLOR (recalled)

CX843 (6823)

CX843-Tr. 6824 D0YLE explanation of CX843 6825-6828 Cross-examination of D0YLE 6828-6829 VIVlRITO testimony about ACI 6830-6857 4

Code (whether there is provision for radial thermal l

expansion of the steam generators, or whether snubbers existed relative to the lateral restraint beam)

AX157 (6851) (ff. 6851)

AX157-Tr. 6855 CX781 and 829 (ff. 6862)

Staff witnesses CHEN, TAPIA, 6863-7036 RAJAN, BURWELL, TAYLOR (resumed)

Cross-Examination (and Board 6863-7014 4

i Questions)

CX763(6877)(ff.6877)

Applicants' witness REEDY 6905-6927 (comments)

CX784 ff. 6940 CX782 ff. 6945 (6946)

CX795 ff. 6973 CX828 7000)

CX828-Tr. 7000 AX148(7013-7014)

AX148-Tr. 7014 i

AX148 (addition) (ff. 7014)

Board Examination 7015-7036 Staff SIT witnesses excused 7036 CASE (rebuttal) - Witness 7037-7059 J. D0YLE Direct Examination 7036-7041 Voir Dire 7041 Applicants 7041 CX842, 761, 762, 763, 805 CX842,761, (7042) 762,763, 805-Tr. 7042 Cross Examination 7044-7059 Applicants 7043-7059 D0YLE excused 7059 Applicants - Panel of REEDY, 7060-7194a VIVIRITO, FINNERAN, CHANG, VEGA (Rebuttal of Staff SIT Panel)

CX766 (ff. 7060) j

..m.

j Date Vol.

Subject Pages Exhibits i

5/19/S3 25 Direct Examination of VIVIRITO 7061-7076 (re effect of pipe support I

stiffness variations on the j

seismic behavior of the piping system) f Cross-examination of VIVIRITO 7076-7084 (andBoardquestions)

CASE (WALSH) 7076-7084 Direct Examination of FINERAN 7084-7091 and VIVIRITO Cross Examination of FINERAN 7091-7092 CASE (WALSH)

Redirect Examination of FINERAN 7092-7093 Recross Examination of FINERAN 7093-7095 CASE (WALSH) 7092-7095 Further Redirect, Cross 7095-7195a Examination, and Board questions of REED U NERAN, CHANG, and VEGA Staff Witnesses SAmY DIAB and 7197-7214 WALTON L. JENSEN re Feed & Bleed (Unresolved Safety Issue A-45) 4 Direct Examination 7197-7200 Prof. Qualif. of Diab (ff. 7198)

Prof Qualif. of Jensen f

(ff.7199)

L Board Examination 7200-7214 Panel of DIAB and JENSEN 7214 excused CONTENTION 22 (EMERGENCY 7214-7272 PLANNING)(resumed)

Applicants - Panel of SKILES, ARMSTRONG, BORN, TATE, JONES, and LANCASTER (re State &

site emergency plans)

?

Direct Examination 7216-7221 l;

JONE5 testimony re Operability b

of Testing of Emergency li Sirens (ff. 7218)

]

SKILES, ARMSTRONG, BORN testimony

-e Judge Jordan's Inquiry p

lI Regarding Emerge cy Planning j

Recomendations ff. 7220)

]

Cross Exanination and Board 7221-7272 Questions)

Texas 7221-7272

'l Hearing session adjourned 7272 End of Volume 25 7272

~

l

il

. Date Vol.

Subject Pages Exhibits j

b/20/83 25a 7273-7485 Hearing Resumes 7276 SX209, 210, 211 (7276)

SX209,210 1

(ff. 7276) 211-Tr. 7276 i

AX158,159 (7276) (ff. 7277)

AX158,159-

~

1 Tr. 7277 CX841 (7278) (ff. 7278)

CX841-Tr. 7278 AX160, 161 (7279-7282)

AX160,161-(ff.7282)

Tr. 7282 CX109A-197E, 204-208, 211, 215, CX109A-197E, 218, 220, 222-23, 225, 227, 204-208,211,215, 230, 234, 236, 247-48, 253, 218,220,222-23, 267, 278-79, 284, 286-88, 225,227,230,234, 290, 292, 293, 295-96, 301, 236,247-48,253, 305-07, 310-12, 314, 316, 267,278-79,284, 318-19, 321-22, 325, 328-29, 286-88,290,292, n

331, 333-37, 339, 343-46, 348, 293.295-96,301, 350-53, 357, 361-65, 378, 382, 305-07,310-12, 385, 387, 392-93, 396-99, 314,316,318-19, 402-03, 406, 449-59, 478-80, 321-22,325,328-482-84, 489-90, 492-93, 29,331,333-37, 497-98, 500, 502-07, 510, 512, 339,343-46,348, 514-15, 518, 520-21, 523-25, 350-53,357,361-528-30, 533-42, 545-46, 550, 65,378,382,385, 1

557, 560-61, 563, 565, 569, 387,392-93,396-590-92, 595-96, 598. 602-16, 99,402-03,406, 617, 619-21, 623-28, 629-45, 449-59,478-80, 646-49, 738 (7283) 482-84,489-90, 492-93.497-98, 500,502-07,510 j

512,514-15,518, 520-21.523-25, i

i 528-30, 533-42, 545-46,550,557, 560-61,563,565, 569,590-92,595-96,598,602-16 617.619-21,623-28,629-45,646-49,738-Tr. 7284 j

CONTENTION 22 (EMERGENCY 7285-7485 i

PLANNING) (Resumed) j Applicants' Witness LANCASTER 7285-7287 l

Applicants' panel of SKILES, 7287-7408 ARM 5TRONG, BORN, JONES, TATE.

1 LANCA3TER(resumed)

Cross Examination (resumed) 7287-7291 FEMA 7287-7291 i

Board Examination 7291-7386

o n.

l l

I Date Vol.

Subject Pages Exhibits

~

l 5/20/83 25a Redirect' Examination 7387-7390 Board Examination 7390-7397

?

Recross Examination 7397-7400 FEMA 7397-7400 l

CASE 7401-7408 Applicants' Panel excused 7408 FEMA Witnesses LOOKABAUGH &

7409-7481 7 NTON Direct Examination ~

7409-7416 FEMA Staff Supplemental Testimony of Albert Lookbaugh and John Benton 1

on Emergency Preparedness (and attachments) (ff. 7414)

FEMA Staff Second Supplemental Testimony of Albert Lookabaugh and John Benton on Emergency Preparedness (ff. 7414)

Board Examination 7416-7464 Cross Examination 6464-Texas 7464-7480 CASE 7480-7481 Staff Witness ROHRER (recalled) 7482-7485 i

Direct Examination 7482-7485 SX212 U484)

NRC Staff Supplemental e

Testimony of David M. Rohrer j

on Emergency Preparedness J

(ff.7484) 4 NRC Staff Supplemental ll Testimony of David M. Rohrer 4

and Thomas Urbanik II on h

Emergency) Preparedness j

(ff.7484 1

Hearing session adjourned 7485 i

End of Vol. 25a 7485 j

3 6/7/83 25b Conference Call 7486-7535 T,

6/13/83 26 7536-7809 Hearing resumes 7539 l

Discussion re Walsh/Doyle 7540-7631 3

issues (e.g., applicability of the ASME Code to the j

thermal expansion of pipe supports) j F

1 i

1

=

s Date Vol.

Subject Pages Exhibits 6/13/83 26 CONTENTION 22 (EMERGENCY 7633-7680 PREPAREDNESS) (resumed)

Staff Witness ROHRER (recalled) 7633-7680 Board Examination 7633-7672 Cross Examination on Board 7672-7680 i

Examination CASE 7672-7680 AX162(7681)

AX162-Tr. 7683 AX163 (7682)

AX163-Tr. 7683 ROHRER excused 7680 Discussion re CASE motion to 7684-7685 reopen record on steam generator upper lateral restraint D*scussion of Texas' motion 7685-7720 to add new contention

[

(concerning adequacy of county lans under 10 C.F.R.

i 50.47 b) l CONTENTION 5 (resumed) -

7721-FINDINGS OF CONSTRUCTION r

APPRAISAL TEAM (" CAT")

Staff Witnesses A. B. BEACH, 7721-8226

[

D. C. FORD, R. M. COMPTON, l

and W. A. HANSEN F

Direct Examination 7722-7726 I

Testimony (ff. 7726)

Voir Dire Examination 7727-7755 l

CASE 7727-7737 j

Applicants 7737-7753l 7

Direct Examination 7755-7759:

l Cross Examination 7759-85 I CASE (BOLTI) 7759-7170 Applicants 7771-7785 Redirect Examination 7785 AX164 (7786) (ff. 7793)

AX164.-Tr. 7792 Cross Examination 7786-7793 Applicants 7786-7793 Direct Examination (and 7794-7807 l

BoardExamination)

AX165(7801-7802)

Hearing. session adjourned 7808 End of Vol. 26 7809

,. l Date Vol.

Subject Pages Exhibits l

6/14/83 27 7810-8079 Hearing resumes 7813 Staff Witnesses, BEACH, FORD, 7813-8226 N PTON, HANSEN (re CAT report (resumed)

Board Examination 7813-7814 l

Redirect Examination (resumed) 7814-7815 Cross Examination.

7815-7842 Applicants 7815 CASE (BOLTZ) 7815-7837 7

Applicants 7837-7842

[

AX166 (7838-7842)

AX167 (7838-7842)

CASE 7843-7844 Direct Examination (and Board 7845-7855 Examination) 2 Cross Examination (and Board 7856-7868 l

Examination)

CASE 7856-7861 Applicants 7861-7864 Texas Public Utilities 7864-7868 Commission (PUC) - Skinner Applicants 7868-7881 Applicants' Witness TOLSON 7882-7923 (resumed)

Applicants' Witness BRANDT 7897-7923 (resumed)

AX168 (7897-7899) i Direct Examination 7882-7906 f

Recross Examination (and Board 7906-7923 i

Examination)

~

l CASE 7906-7923 l

TOLSON and BRANDT temporarily 7921 t

excused Recross Examination (of Staff's 7921-7924 panel)

Direct, Cross and Board 7923-7937 Examination (of Staff's panel)

Applicants' Witness BRANDT 7938-7939 i

(resumed) 1 Cross-Examination (of Staff's 7946-7949 L

panel)

CASE 7946-7949

[

Direct Examination (of Staff's 7951-7952 pangl)

Cross Examination (of Staff's 7952-7973 panel)

L Direct Examination (of Staff's 7973-7974 panet)

7

' 3 1

a Date Vol.

Subject Pages Exhibits 6/14/83 27 Board Examination (of Staff's 7974-7977 panel)

Direct Examination (of Staff's 7977 panel)

Cross Examination (of Staff's 7977-7981 panei F CASE 7977-7981 CX853 (7977-7978) (ff. 7978)

CX853-Tr. 7979 Board Examination (of Staff's 7982-7988 panel)

Direct and Board Examination 7988-7992 (of Staff's panel)

Cross Examination (of Staff's 7992 panel)

Applicants 7992 Board Examination (of Staff's 7993-7997 panel)

Direct Examination (of Staff's 7998-8003 (panel)

Board Examination (of Staff's 8003-8006 panel)

Direct Examination (of Staff's 8007-8014 (panel)

Cross Examination (of Staff's 8015-8026 panel)

CASE 8015-8022 Applicants 8022-8026 Board Examination 8026-8027

,l Direct Examination 8027-8028 i

Cross Examination 8028-8036 CASE 8028-8034 Applicants 8034-8036 Texas PUC 8036 i

i Board Examination 8036-8059 Recross Examination 8059-8062 I

Discussion (re scope of 8062-8069 Contention 5, intimidation 2

3 of QC inspectors, dis-couraging of filing NCRs)

~

Direct Examination 8069-8070 I

Cross Examination 8070-8071 Applicants 8070-8071 Board Examination and Recross 8071-8078

)

Examination by Applicants Recross Examination 8078 y

l CAS,E 8078 e

i Hearing session adjourned 8078 l

End of Vol. 27 8079 i

.,i i

Date Vol.

Subject Pages Exhibits-6/15/83 28 8080-8345 L

Hearing resumes 8083 Staff's Panel of A. 8. 8EACH, 8083-8226 i

d D. C. FORD, R. M. COMPTON, and W. A. HANSEN (re CAT report (resumed)

Direct Examination 8083-8084 Cross Examination 8084-8092 CASE 8084-8092 l

Board Examination 8092-8094 Recross Examination 8094 CASE 8094 Direct and Board Examination 8095-8102 Cross Examination 8102-8134 CASE 8102-8131 Applicants 8131-8133 5

Texas PUC 8133-8134 Board Examination 8134-8135 Recross Examination 8135-8136 Applicants 8135-8136 Redirect Examination 8136 Direct Examination 8137-8143 Cross Examination 8143-8168 i

CASE 8143-8154 j

Applicants 8154-8167 Redirect Examination 8168-8169 j

Recross Examination 8169-8181 Applicants 8169-8174 CASE 8175-8176 Applicants 8177-8180 CASE 8180-8181 9

Direct Examination 8181-8185 j

Cross Examination 8185-8191

/

CASE 8185-8187 Applicants 8187-8191 I

Redirect Examination 8191-8192 Recross Examination 8192 CASE 8192 Board Examination 8192-8196 Recross Examination 8196-8197 CASE 8196-8197 Cross Examination 8206-8221 CASE 8206-8221 Direct Examination 8222-8225 Cross Examination 8226 CASE 8226 Staff's witnesses excused 8226 r

i-

+l j

. Date Vol.

Subject Pages Exhibits 6/15/83 28 Ap)1icants' Panel of THOMAS 8227-8344 3RANDT, RONALD TOLSON, and i

ANTONIO VEGA (re CAT findings)

Direct Examination 8228-8235 I

Cross and Board Examination 8235-8276 CASE 8235-8268 Staff 8268-8276 Board Examination 8276-8281 Recross Examination 8281-8283 CASE 8281-8283 Direct Examination 8283-8285 Cross Examination 8285-8287 Staff 8285-8286 i

CASE 8286-8287 i

Board Examination 8288-8292 Direct Examination 8292-8294 Cross Examination 8294 i

Staff 8294 Board Examination 8295 Cross Examination 8295-8301 Staff 8295-8298 CASE 8298-8301 l

Board Examination 8301-8304 Direct Examination 8305-8306 h

Cross Examination 8306-8310 5taff 8306-8307 l

CASE 8307-8310 i

Board Examination 8310-8311 l

Recross Examination 8311-8321 Staff 8311-6313 CASE 8313-8321 Direct Examination 8322 Cross Examination 8323-8332 Staff 8323-8326 i

CASE 8326-8332 9

Board Examination 8332-8340 Recross Examination 8340-8343 CASE 8340-8343 Direct Examination 8343-8344 Hearing session adjourned 8344

)

End of Vol. 28 8345 e

8346-8619 k

6/16/83 29 l

Hearing resumes 8349 i

L Applicants' Panel of BRANDT, 8349-8470 T0tSON,andVEGA(resumed)

CX301 CX301-Tr. 8349

{

CX837 (8350)

CX837-Tr. 8350

(

.m i

e

~

. Date Vol.

Sub3ect Paces Exhibits-6/16/83 29 CX846 (8350)

CX846-Tr. 8350 CX848 (8351-8352)

CX848-Tr. 8352 Discussion re plant tour 8352-8356 Board Examinaticn 8356-8375 j

AX168 (8374)

AX168-withdrawn AX169 (8375)

AX169-Tr. 8376 l

Direct Examination 8375-8379 q

Cross Examination 8379-8388 Staff 8379-8385 CASE 8385-8388 j

Redirect Examination 8388-8390 Direct Examination 8391-8392 Cross Examination 8392-8393

]

Staff 8392 1

CASE 8393 j

Direct Examination 8393-8394 cross Examination 8394-8399 i

Staff 8394 CASE 8394-8399 Board Examination 8399-8401 Direct Examination 8401-8403 Cross Examination (and Board 8403-8438 Questions) 1 Staff 8403-8428 Board Questions 8428-8431 Case 8431-8438

<i Direct Examination 8439-8440 q

Cross Examination 8440-8453 4

Staff 8440-8452 CASE 8452-8453 Board Examination 8453-8457

/

Cross Examination 8457-8462 l

Staff 8457-8458 1

CASE 8458-8462 Direct Examination 8462-8463 l

Cross Examination (and Board 8463-6470 j

Questions) li Staff 8463-8469 j

Cross Examination interrupted 8470 J

BOARD QUESTION: WHETHER THE-1 STAFF AND APPLICANTS CONSIDERED l.

WHETHER A VOLTAGE SPIKE OR A i

PRESSURE SURGE IN THE PIPING SYSTE}l5 COULD CAUSE MORE THAN i

ONE CONTROL INSTRUMENT TO FAIL 7 I

NRC Staff Witness THOMAS G.

8470-8498 j

DUNNIhG

,i

~

s 1

-)

- ~

Date Vol.

Subject Pages Exhibits 6/16/83 29 Direct Examination 8471-8473 Prof. Qualif. of Dunning (ff.8372)

Board Examination 8473-8498 Supplemental Affidavit of Thomas G. Dunning (ff. 8498)

Applicants' Panel of BRANDT, 8499-8607 TOL5ON, and VEGA (re CAT j

report) (resumed) (resumed)

Cross Exainination 8499-8502 j

CASE 8499-8502 l

Board Examination P502-3510 1

Recross Examination 8510 i

CASE 8510 I

Redirect Examination 8510-8512 j

Direct Examination 8512-8416 Cross Examination 8516-8519 j

5taff 8516-8519 Board Examination 8520-8521 Recross Examination 8521-8522 CASE 8521-8522 Direct Examination 8522-8527 Cross Examination 8527-8532 i

staff 8527-8531 l

CASE 8531-8532

.l Direct Examination 8532-8534

~

Cross Examination (and Board 8534-1 Questions)

Staff 8534-8543 ll CASE 8543-BM9 j

NRC Staff Witness D. C. FORD 8549-9556 i

(re CAT report)

(I Cross Examination (resumed) 8556-8367

?

CASE 8556-8567 l-Board Examination 8568 8571 Cross Examination 8571-5taff 8551

[I L.

CASE 6671-8579 l-Board Examination 8579-8582 NRC Staff Witnesses A. B. BEACH.

8582-8591 L

D. C. FORD, R. M. COMPTON, and W. A. HANSEN (re CAT report)

Board Examination 8582-8591 Panel e~xcused 8591

' Date Vol.

Subject Pages Exhibits 6/16/83 29 Applicants' Panel of BRANDT 8591-8607 l

andVEGA(resumed)

Cross Examination (and Board 8591-8607 Questions)

Staff 8593-8596 I

CASE 8598-8607 NRC Staff Witness W. A. HANSEN 8607-8608

)

(clarificationoftestimony) i Hearing adjourned 8618 End of Vol. 29 8619 4

7/5/83 29a Conference. Call 8620-8683 7/20/83 29b Conference Call 8684-8721 10/17/83 30 8751-8927 Hearing Resumes 8754 NRC Staff Witnesses 8756-8846 T. F. WESTERMAN, C. R.'0 BERG, J. E. BESS, C. E. JOHNSON, J. 1. TAPIA, K. A. WHITTLESEY, J.

and R. G. TAYLOR (Regarding The Findings of a Special i

j Inspection Conducted of The Fuel Building For The Comanche Peak Facility, Unit 1. During The Period Ma 23 Through l

June 10, 1983 i

Direct Examination 8756-8763

}

Voir Dire Examination 8764-8765 CASE 8764-8765 i

Pre-filed testimony of Staff i

panel (ff. 8765) i Cross Examination (and Board 8766-8846 I

Questions)

.I Applicants 8766-8772 CASE 8772-8846 j

AX170 (8775) (ff. 8775)

AX171(8846-8847)(ff.8847)

AX171-Tr. 8847 R

Discussion re stipulation filed 8846-8848 T

10/14/83 concerning results I

of interviews with C. Peak l

employers Discuss, ion re NRC Office of 8848-8853 Investigation (01) investiga-tions and in camera hearing sessions Discussion re index of 8854 I

investigations

+

..-2

. t Date Vol.

Subject Pages Exhibits 10/17/83 30 Staff Panel of WESTERMAN, 8858-8886 N RG, BESS, JOHNSON, TAPIA, WHITTLESEY TAYLOR (resumed, after afternoon recess) l Board Examination 8859-8885 i

Recross Examination 8885-8886 d

CASE 8885-8886 Staff Panel excused 8886 Oral Argument re Board's 8886-8911 sua sponte authority regarding emergency planning Texas 8886-8891 CASE 8891 Applicants 8891-8897 Staft 8898-8901 Rebuttal 8901-8903 Texas 8901-8902 Applicants' Further Argument 8903-8904 CASE 8904 Board determination & further 8906-8911 argument NRC Staff Witness ROBERT TAYLOR 8913-Regarding The Relationship 8etween As-Built Certified Designs and Vendor Certified Designs Direct Examination 8913-8915 TAYLOR Pre-filed Testimony (ff.8914)

HRC Staff Inspection Report 50-445/83-24,50-446/83-15 (8/24/83) (ff. 8917)

Cross Examination (and Board 8918-8927 Questions CASE 8918-8927 1&EBulletin79-14(ff.8926)

Hearing Adjourned 8927 End of Vol. 30 8927 10/18/83 31 8928-9075 Hearing Resumed 8931 NRC Staff Witness TAYLOR 8932-9005 (resumed)

Cross Examination (resumed) 8932-8981 land Board Questions)

~

G

+

c.

s e 6*

e 40 -

Date Vol.

Sub.iect Pages Exhibits 10/18/83.

31 CASE 8932-8981 Board Examination 8986-9005 Redirect Examination 9005 Witness TAYLOR excused 9006

~

AX172 (9006-9007) (ff. 9007)

Ap)1icants' Witnesses 9008-9075

1. G..TOLSON and G. R. PURDY regarding NRC Inspection of Fuel Building and Design Change Verification Direct Examination 9008-9013

~

AX170 (ff. 9009)

Applicants' Panel resumed 9015 (afternoonsession)

Cross Examination (and Board 9015-9038 Questions e

CASE 9015-9038 Board Examination 9039-9055.

Cross Examination 9055-9056 Staff 9055-9056 Redirect Examination 9056-9057 Cross and Board Examination 9058-9075 CASE 9058-9075 Applicants' panel excused 9075 Hearing Adjourned 9075 End of Vol. 31 9075 10/21/83 31a Conference Call 9076-9134 11/16/83 31b Conference Call 9135-9206 l

i 1/12/84 31c Conference Call 9207-9256 2/10/84 31d Conference Call 9257-9298 b

[

2/15/84 31e Conference Call 9299-9336 3

l 2/20/84 32 9337-9601 j

Hearing Resumes 9340 Witnesses N. H. WILLIAMS and 9341-9601 4

J.E. WARD (re"CygnaReport")

B Cross Examination 9341-9403 Applicants 9342-9403 Prof. Qualif. of Williams & Ward (ff.3342) j Board Exhibit ("BX") Feb. 1984 g

No, 1 (9344)

L BX Feb. 1984 No. 2 (9346)

BX Feb. 1984 (ff.(348)

No. 2-Tr. 9347

--ee-w,

,n,n,,

m

-~

,---w.-

--,---,e--

---,...s--o.

e-m.-m,,--,--

,-,e

~.

,n

E

. 1 f

I

]

Date Vol.

Sub.iect Pages Exhibits

I 2/20/84 32 BX Feb. 1984 No. 3 (9360)

BX Feb. 1984 No. 3-Tr. 9361 i

BX Feb. 1984 No. 4 (9362)

BX Feb. 1984 i

(ff. 9363)

No. 4-Tr. 9363 AX174 (9377) (ff. 9403)

AX174-Tr. 9403 1

CASE 9404 Voir Dire 9405 CASE 9405-9413 CASE Cross Examination (and 9414-9470 Board Questions (continued)

WARD and WILLIAMS (resumed for 9473-9601 afternoonsession)

Texas 9473-9476 Texas PUC 9476-9477 BX Feb. 1984. No. 5 (9489-9490)

BX Feb. 1984 3

(ff.9490)

No. 5-Tr. 9490 a

Staff 9477-9492 Board Questions 9492-9502 Recross Examination (and 9502-9601 Board Questions)

Applicants 9502-9546 CASE 9548-9596 Texas 9596-9601 4

l Hearing Adjourned 9601 End of Vol. 32 9601 2/21/84 33 9602-9844 g

Hearing Resumed 9605 l

CASE Witness H. HUTCHISON 9605-9676 (rebuttal of CYGNA report witnesses)

Examination (and Board 9606-9676 Board Questions)

CASE 9606-9631 Texas 9631-9634 Staff 9635-9642 Board 9642-9652 CASE 9652-9659 Applicants 9659-9664 j

CASE 9644-9666 Applicants 9670-9671 CASE 9672-9674 Texas 9674-9675

(

Staff 9675-9676 Witnesses WILLIAMS and WARD 9677-9844 (resumed) 6 t

~

~

42 -

1 Date Vol.

Subject Pages Exhibits k

2/21/84 33 Board Examination 9677-9680

_Ap Hicants' Examination (and 9680-9721 loard Questions)

AX175(9691)(ff.9693)

AX175-Tr. 9693 1

AX176 (9694) (ff. 9695)

AX176-Tr. 9695 CASE Examination 9721-9725 Tixxiai. Examination 9725-9727 Staff Ixamination 9728-9739 Board Eramination 9739-9748 CASE Exa.nination 9748-9751 Board Examination 9779-9783 CASE Examination (Doyle) 9783-9844 CX891 (9823-9825) (ff. 9825)

CX891-Tr. 9825 CX884 (9826)

Hearing session adjourned 9844 End of Vol. 33 9844 2/21/84 33a In, Camera Session 1-16 2/22/84 34 9845-9911 WILLIAMS and WARD (resumed) 9848-9881 CASE witness J. D0YLE 9881-9911 Applicants' Examination 9881-9891 5taff Examination 9891-9911 Hearing session adjourned 9911 End of Vol. 34 9911 l

2/23/84 35 9912-10.327 i

Hearing session reconvened 9915 I

Board announcements (re discon-9915-9930 tinuing examination of Hutchinson and sequestration l

of witnesses on compliance i

with welding procedures and QA for welding procedures)

Discussion re meaning of 9932-9953 l

sequestration and scope 4

of issues i

CAsi witness H. STINER re 9953-9964 welding procedures and QA for welding procedures Examination 9953-9964 s-e-

g-gwe-

---

yy.%--wgy

.,w.w_-ywy-_%-y49~,. -.%.e-m,,

-e-,.g.---w,-,_.myn..

,-.y.,,,,_-,w_w_

,_%..-,%w,-,,,-%-w.,ww-w ww wwy,,-y

q I

' j i

Date Vol.

Subject Pages Exhibits 2/23/84 35 Applicants' witnesses 9964-A-9977 C. R. BROWN, A. M. BRAUMILLER, S. FERNANDES, 1. PICKETT, F. E. COLEMAN, C. T. BRANDT, i

W. E. BAKER, M. D. MUSCENTE, J. D. -GREEN, J. E. HALLFORD -

regarding allegations of D. Stiner and H..Stiner concerning weave welding, welding of misdrilled holes, downhill welding, and weld rod control AX177 (9964-A) (ff. 9976)

AX177-Tr. 9976 Applicants' Examination 9965-9977 licants' panel dismissed 9977 App (subject to recall)

CASE witnesses H. & D. STINER 9978-9980 7 amination 9978-9980 CASE 9978-9980 Ap)1icants' witnesses W. E.

9980-10.046 3AKER and M. D. MUSCENTE Examination 9981-10,047 Applicants 9981-10,046 i

AX178, 179 (10,024)

Applicants' Witnesses W. E. BAKER 10,049-10,141 and M. D. MUSCENTE (resumed afternoonsession)

CASE 10.051-10,121 Staff 10,121-10,138 Board 10,138-10.139 Applicants 10,139 Panel temporarily excused 10.141 CASE witness D. STINER 10,142-10,327

- Txamination 10,142-10.327 CASE 10.142-10,158 CX915-A and 915-B (10,154-10,155)

Voir Dire 10,158-10,190 Applicants 10,158-10,190 Board Examination 10.190-10,197 CASE Examination 10,198-10,202 Applicants' Examination 10,242-10,304 AX180 (10.262-10,263)

CX915-D(10,270) l Staff Examination 10,304-10,327 l

Hearing session recessed 10.327 a

End of Vol. 35 10.327 I

. =..

2. w.

Date Vol.

Subject Pages Exhibits 2/24/84 36 10.328-10.349 Hearing session reconvened 10,331 Hearing on welding issues 10,331 i

suspended l

Written testimony of CASE witnesses H. & D. Stiner (ff. 10,333)

Statement of D. STINER 10,335-10,336 Board re its decision on 10,337-10.340 design QA D0YLE statement 10,341-10,347 Statement by D. WILLIAMS 10.346 Discussion of AX178, 179, 10.348-10,349 179A & B Hearing session adjourned 10,349 End of Vol. 36 10,349 2/28/84 36a Conference Call 10.350-10,383 3/19/84 37 10,384-10,715 Hearing reconvened 10,387 Discussion re sequestration 10,388-10,404 CASE witness D. STINER (recalled) 10,408-10,564 Txamination 10,408-10,564 CASE 10,408-10,430 Applicants 10,430-10.449 CX961&962(10,436)

CX961&962-(ff.10,436)

Tr. 10.436 B

CX963(10,448)(ff.10.448)

CX963-Tr. 10,448 Staff 10,450-10.518 Texas 10.518-10,523 CASE 10,524-10.539 Applicants 10.540-10,541 8

Staff f

10,541-10,564 i

D. STINER excused 10.564 AX178.179A

&l798-Tr. 10,566 CX964(10,566-10,567)

CX964-Tr. 10.567 L

(ff.10.567)

L Discussion of documents 10,568-10.573 requested by CASE l

AX183-A,183 '3,183-C AX183-A.193-B, (10.557-10,578) 183-C-Tr. 10,578 l

AX181, 182, 183 and CX965 AX181,182,183, J

(10,579 in camera)

CX965-Tr. 10,579 f

CASE witneE H. STINER (recalled) 10.579-10,715 Examination 10.579-10,715 CASE 10,579-10,715 Hearing recessed 10,715 j

End of Vol. 37 10,715 l

n

c.

s_.._m..._~..__

. Date Vol.

Subiect Pages Exhibits f

3/20/84 38 10.716-11.018 Hearing reconvened 10,719 CASE witness H. STINER (recalled) 10,734-11,018 T amination 10.734-10,915 Applicants 10.734-10,915 1

Limited appearance statement of B. GARDE (ff. 10,915)

Examination of H. STINER 10,924 (cont'd)

Applicants 10,924-11,018 AX184 (10,939)

Hearing adjourned 11,018 End of Vol. 38 11,018 3/21/84 39 11.019-11.336 Hearing reconvened 11,022 CASE witness H. STINER (resumed) 11.026 T amination (resumed) 11 030-11,192 Applicants 11,030-11.046 Staff 11.047-11,161 CASE 11.161-11,192 CX968 (11,175) (ff.11,180)

CX968-Tr. 11,180 Discussion of negotiations 11.203-11,208 between CYGNA & CASE Limited Appearance of H. STINER 11.192-11,193 Examination of H. STINER 11.211-11,212 (resumed)

CASE 11.211-11,212 i

CASE witness H. STINER excused 11,212 Ap)licants' witness C. 1HOMAS 11.213-11,336 IRANDT (recalled)

Examination 11,213-11.336 Applicants 11.213-11.219 CASE 11.219-11,336 AX186(11,238-11,239)

AX186-Tr. 11,239 (ff. 11,239)

AX187(11,240-11.241)

AX187-Tr. 11.242 AX188 (11,258-11,259)

AX188-Tr. 11,259 (ff. 11,259 AX189 f,11,259 (ff.11,259 AX189-Tr. 11,259 AX190 I,11,259 (ff. 11,259 AX190-Tr. 11,259 AX191 I,11,316 (ff. 11,316 AX191-Tr. 11,316 AX192 I,11.316 (ff. 11.316 AX192-Tr. 11,316 4

i Hearing recessed 11,336 j

End of Vol. 39 11,336 9

t j

h

~(3 x

ru

=

i

~

.a-

~

l-3 E

l p

i Date Vol.

Subject Pages Exhibits'I 3/22/84 40 11.337-11,710 I

Hearing reconvened 11.339 f

Ap)1icants' witness C. THOMAS 11.343-11,350 BRANDT (resumed) 3 8

Examination 11.343-11,350 CASE 11.343-11,350 CASE witness D. STINER (recalled) 11,351-11.362 C. THOMAS BRANDT temporarily 11.362 excused Witness F. E. COLEMAN 11,365-11.378 Examination 11.365-11.378 Board 11.365-11,367 CASE 11.367-11.378 C. THOMAS BRANDT (resumed) 11,378-11.462 Examination 11,378-11.462 CASE 11,378-11.447 Staff 11,447-11,459 CASE 11.459-11.462 BRANDT excused 11.462 Ap)1icants' witness CLIFTON R.

11.463-11,527 BROWN Examination 11.463-11,527 Applicants 11.463-11.470 CASE 11.470-11,515 Staff 11,515-11,519 Appiicants 11,519 Board 11,520-11,524-CASE 11,524-11.525 Applicants 11,525-11,526 Staff 11,527 Witness BROWN excused 11,527 Limited Appearance of BILLIE 11,528-11,532 GARDE Applicants' Witness F. E.

11,532-11,612 COLEMAN Examination 11,532-11,612 Applicants 11,532-11,549 CASE 11.549-11,603 Staff 11,603-11,608 Board 11,608-11,609 Applicants 11,609-11.610 i

Board 11,611-11,612 I

Witness COLEMAN excused 11,612 l

Ap)1icants' Witness ISAIAH 11.615-11,660

)lCAETT l

l l

l

j Date Voh Subject Pages Exhibits 3/22/64 40 Examination 11,615-11.660 1

Applicants 11,615-11,626 i

CASE 11,626-11,655 j

Staff 11,655-11,660 Witness PICKETT excused 11,660 Ap)1icants' witnesses ARMAND M.

11,663-11,705 BRAUMILLER and SALVADOR FERNANDEZ Examination 11,664-11,705 Applicants 11,664-11,667 CASE 11,667-11,681 Applicants 11,681-11,682 CASE 11.682-11,702 Staff 11,702-11,704 Applicants 11,704-11,705 Witnesses BRAUMILLER and 11,705 FERNANDEZ excused Hearing adjourned 11,710 End of Vol. 40 11,710 3/23/84 41 11,711-11,998 Hearing reconvenes 11,714 Witness JIMMIE D. GREEN 11,714-11,758 Examination 11,715-11,758 Applicants 11.715-11,716 CASE 11,716-11,744 Staff 11,744-11.749 Applicants 11,749-11,751 Staff 11,751-11,753 Applicants 11,753-11,754 CASE 11,754-11,758 Witness GREEN excused 11,758 Witnesses MATTHEW D. MUSCENTE 11,759-11,987 and WILLIAM E. 8AKER Examination 11,763-11,987 Applicants 11,763-11,838 AX180(ff.10,263)

AX180-Tr.11,789 AX184 ff. 11,808)

AX184-Tr. 11,808 AX194 11,813)(ff.11,816)'

AX194-Tr. 11,816 AX195 11,813-11,814)

AX195-Tr. 11,816 (ff. 11,816)

AX196(11,816)(ff.*.1.E16)

AX196-Tr. 11,816 CASE 11,838-11,968 Staff 11,968-11,974 l

Voir Dire 11,974-11,975 CASE 11,974-11,975 1

' Date Vol.

Subject Pages Exhibits j

3/23/84 41 AX185 (11,975) (ff. 11,975)

AX185-Tr. 11,975 Staff 11,976-11,977 i

Examination (resumed) 11,977-11,987 Applicants 11,977-11.984 CASE 11,984-11,987 MUSCENTE & BAKER excused 11.987 Hearing adjourned 11,998 End of Vol. 41 11,998 3/30/84 41a Conference Call 11,999-12.033 4/18/84 41b Conference Call 12.034-12,137 4/24/84 42 12,138-12.381 Hearing reconvened 12,141 NRC Staff Witnesses WILLIAM J.

12,141-12,286 COLLINS, LESLIE D. GILBERT, DAVID E. SMITH, and ROBERT G.

TAYLOR, re welding fabrication concerns raised by Mr. & Mrs.

Stiner Direct Examination 12,142-12,146 "NRC 5taff Testimony on Welding Concerns Raised by Mr. & Mrs.

Stiner"(ff.12.146)

" Addendum To Page 27 of NRC Staff Testimony on Welding Fabrication Raised B Mr. & Mrs. Stiner" (yff.12,146)

Cross & Voir Dire Examination 12,147-12.267 by CASE Board Examination 12,267-12,274 Cross Examination by Applicants 12,273-12,274 Re-direct Examination 12,274-12,281 Recross Examination 12.281-12.286 CASE 12,281-12.286 t,

Witnesses COLLINS, GILBERT, 12.286 SMITH, and TAYLOR excused I

Witnesses NANCY H. WILLIAMS and

• 12.289-12,387 GORDON S. BJORKMAN (re Cygn'a Report)

Direct Examination 12,289-12,348 ResumeofBJORKMAN(ff.12.290)

Board. Exhibit April 1984, #1 Board Exhibit April 1984, (12.293) g

1. 1 - Tr. 12,293 9

k I

/,

, 1 Date Vol. ~

Sub.iect Pages Exhibits 4/24/84 42 Cross Examination CASE 12,349-12,387 i

Hearing session adjourned 12,387 i

End of Vol. 42 12,387 4

4/25/84 43 12,388-12,680 Hearing session reconvened 12.391 Witnesses WILLIAMS and BJORKMAN 12,404-12,674 (resumed)

Examination (continued) 12,412-12,674 CASE 12.412-12,674 CX934 (12,504) (ff. 12.522)

CX934-Tr. 12.522 CX923(12.526-12.527)

(ff. 12,527)

Board Exhibit No. 2 April 1984(12,674)

Hearing session adjourned 12,680 End of Vol. 43 12,680 4/26/84 44 12,681-12,926 Hearing session reconvened 12,685 Witnesses WILLIAMS and BJORKMAN 12,697-12,923 (resumed)

Examination _

12,697-12,923 CASE 12,697-12,923 CX933(12,796)(ff.12,796)

~

CX933-Tr. 12,796 "Cygna P.O." (ff. 12,813)

CX928 (ff. 12,903)

CX931(12,911-12,912)

CX931-Tr. 12,912 (ff.12,912)

Hearing session adjourned 12,926 End of Vol. 44 12,926 4/27/84 45 12,927-13.125

~

Hearing session reconvened 12,931 Witnesses WILLIAMS and BJORKMAN 12,931-13.043 (resumed)

Examination 12,932-13,043 CASE 12,932-12,935 GSB-1(w/ attachment) 1 (ff.12,935)

Applicants 12,943-13.001 1

GSB-2 ff. 12.977 GSB-3 ff. 12,977 GSB-4 ff. 12,977 3

CASE 13,002-13,004 1

e

j l8,

' I Date Vol.

Subject Pages Exhibits 4/27/84 45 Staff 13,004-13,005 13,005-13,009 Applicants

, -5 Attachment 1 j

(ff. 13,008)

Staff 13,009-13.043 J

AX197 (13.031) (ff. 13.031)

CASE Witness JACK D0YLE 13,047-13,071.

T rect Examination 13.047-13.048

" Amended Testimony of CASE Witness Jack Doyle" (ff. 13.048)

Cross Examination 13.049-13.062 Cygna 13,049-13.062 Board Examination 13.063-13.068 13.068-13,071 Examination Cygna 13,068-13.071 Witness JACK D0YLE excused 13,071 Witnesses WILLIAMS and BJORKMAN 13.071-13,125 (resumed)

Examination 13.072-12.125 Cygna 13.072-13.092 CASE 13.092-13,125 Hearing session adjorned 13,125 End of Vol. 45 13,125 5/1/84 46 13,126-13,354 Hearing session reconvened 13.129 Witnesses WILLIAMS and BJORKMAN 13,131-13,305 (resumed)

Examination 13,131-13.350 Cygna 13,131-13,139 CASE 13,139-13,350 CX1,018 (13,309) (ff. 13,309)

CX1,016-Tr. 13,309 J.

Hearing session adjourned 13.354 End of Vol. 46

\\

5/2/84 47 13.355-13.597 Hearing session reconvened 13.358 Cy na/ Texas Utilities contract ff. 13,'158)

Witnesses WILLIAMS and BJORKMAN 13,363-13.597 i

(resumed)

Exami' nation (resumed) 13,364-13.597 l

CASE 13,364-13.597 0

9 g

I m

l

~

.!. i

• s

{

51 -

Date Vol.

Sub[ect Pages Exhibits

(

5/2/84 47 CX995 (13,373-13,374)

CX995-Tr. 13.374 l

(ff. 13.374)

CX907(13,454)(ff.13,454)

CX907-Tr. 13.454 CX889,890(13,496)

CX889,890-(ff. 13,496)

Tr. 13.496 CX939& Supplement (13,519)

CX939 &

(ff. 13,519)

Supplement -

Tr. 13,519 i

"DCC - Follow-up Review" (ff. 13.581) t i

Hearing session adjourned 13,597 I

End of Vol. 47 13,597 I

5/3/84 48 13.598-13,794 Hearing session reconvened 13,601 I

Witnesses WILLIAMS and BJORKMAN 13,601-13,726 (resumed) 1 Examination 13,604-13,726 i

Applicants 13,604-13,651 Cygna 13,652-13,674 Diagram "Embedment Length",

labeled NHW-1" (ff. 13,657)

" Communications Report of October 6,1983"(ff.13,657)

CASE 13,674-13,722 Staff 13,722-13,725 Witnesses WILLIAMS and BJORKHAN 13,726 excused

[

WitnessWILLIAMS(recalled) 13,727-13,728 Examination 13,727-13,728 L

Applicants 13,727-13,728 CASE witness MARK A. WALSH 13,729-13,791 7 rect Examination 13,729-13,751

" Revised Testimony of CASE Witness Mark A. Walsh" and

]

exhibits (ff. 13,371)

Cross-Examination 13,751-13,791 1

Applicants 13,751-13,775

?.

Cygna 13,776-13,790 Staff 13,790-13,791 Hearing session adjourned 13,794 End of hearing session 13,794 6/28/84 Conference Call 13.598-13,6797 q

• /

It appears.that there is an error in the pagination of the transcript of this confer'ence call, as Vol. 48 of the, transcript of the evidentiary hearing session of May 3, 1984 also starts on page 13,598.

a W"

l. Kf

..Mw deck 4w3**+ S

• ifmsc ed / c'sG /Y

/m 1

i

-dpm ~t

/7 I

lo February 25,"1985 Y

AMlMt.a.LT G

em 61Id M 8.

854553 4TNI ED STATES OF AMERICA l

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION V.,

BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD gp f

In the M'atter of

)

i

.)

TEXAS UTILITIES GENERATING

)

Docket Nos. 50-445-2 COMPANY, et al.

)

~

)

and 50-446-2 (Comanche Peak Steam Electric

)

Station", Units 1 and 2)

)

9 A-85-59 CASE OPPOSITION TO STAFF MOTION

,g FOR INDEFINITE EXTENSION OF TIME I

The Citizens Association for Safe Energy (CASE) opposes the

~

NRC Staff's (Staff) extension of time request because it will /

produce. a major delay in the resolution of critica?. issues whose determination will greatly advance a final licensing decision on

~ the Comanche Peak ' nuclear power plant.

In support of this 1

opposition CASE relies on t'hree principal arguments.

First, delay in resolution of issues in Nuclear Regulatory Commission I

j licensing proceedings is contrary to public policy and the unambiguous policies of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

i Second, the Staff does not have the right to postpone board resolution of a significant motion when its only purpose is to f

decide how they want to interpret the facts, already gathered, which are the subject of this motion.

Third, even if the Staff has the right to delay board resolution of a motion pending the Staff's development of a position on the available facts it has I

j waived that right in this proceeding.

L

./,-r

/.f f J9 w ~ o, y

y..

n

._--._-.m_.,...=

)

).,.

I I

In our principal motion we have rpesented our basic argument t

that an early resolution of the motion is essential to protect f

' CASE, 'the Board an'd other~ parties from wasted time and effort.

~

~

We incorporate that argument here by reference.

(CASE Motion, j

pp. 36-41).

l A.

Delay Is Contrary To The Public Interest

~

And Nuclear Regulatory Commission Policy

'l In numerous filings and public statements Applicant has made clear khat even a one-day delay in a licensing decision at CPSES would cost the utility and, if the state rate commission allows, its -ratepayers, $650,000 to $1,000,000.

These are extra costs which will be incurred whether the ultimate licencing decision is favorable or unfavorable to the utility.

However, if, as we,I' '

forese.e, a decision against licensing is rendered there is an added public interest in an early decision.

An early decision will avoid additional sunk costs.

Even if the final decision is k

only a massive retrofit effort to correct construction defects, l;

the earlier that retrofit rpogram is implemented, the less r

erroneous construction work will have to be undone.

In short, delay.has an even more serious impact on the public whe'n the P

i ultimate decision is license denial or a major rework. ' Surely no 1l'

[

one would now seriously doubt that there is at least a 1

1 substantial possibility that one of these two conclusions will-1

?

emerge here.

l li We will not burden this record by citing.the voluminous 1

]

Commission and Atomic Safety and Licensing Appeals Board il references to the evils of delay and the du'ty of the Atomic

r J

4

+

i 3-

~

?

j Safety and Licensing Board and the parties to avoid delay.

In the face of such at clear statement of policy we are frankly i

~

appalled 'that the Commiss' on's own Staff would so casually S

propose an indefinite delay and do so with so little care for prescribing when that delay -will end.

4 The Staff here offers no asiurance that,it can respond to j

the February 4 CASE motion by any particular time.

In fact the i

' filing is remarkably ambiguous on this point.

The Staff lists,

i several. pre-conditions for its responding to the CASE. motions ti l

1)

Completion of an unknown number of SSERs " hopefully" l

by the end of March, 1985.

(Staff Motion, p. 3) f 2)

Input from the two CPSES task forces to Mr. Noonan

~

~

(Staff.-

currently anticipated by the end of March. _

Motion, p. 3; Noonan affidavit, p. 3)

~

j 3 )'

Staff consideration of the proper remedy to be adopted j

if the QA program is'" indeterminate" which includes

}

Staff assessment"of Applicant measures taken, underway U

and to be proposed in the future.

(Staff Motion, pp.

]

.I, 3-4)

No date at all is proposed for when these might

-1

]

occur.

The Motion then, incredibly, states that the Staff is

" hopeful that it will be in a position to respond to CASE's l

motion before the end of March 1985."

(Staff Motion, p. 5 ),

-?

q Assuming the quoted phrase does not contain one of two typos --

1.e.

" hopeful" should read " doubtful" or "1985" should read "1986" -- the statement is ludicrous and reveals the Staff',s intent tio mislead the Board into accepting incrementally small

[

but cumulatively large, extensions of time thus postponing for

__m__

,,,w

8 4

4-months or more any action on the CASE motion.

Such a tactic, if i

attempted by CASE would be viciously denounced by Staff and Applicant.

Staff should'be treated no better.

The simple fact is that 'the Staff will not complete "its evaluation of J

Applicants' quality assurance program" and will not adopt "a final position regarding its adequacy" (StafE Motion, p. 4) for if not years.

The bona fides of the Staff position would

months, be less suspect if the motion had honestly admitted this reality.

3 i

The Noonan affidavit is itself a model of obfuscation.

j First, is Mr. Noonan really in charge?

If so, why is he unable to state' with any reasonable precision when persons who work for i

him -- like the two task forces, the SSER preparars (presumably l

/

l the TRT) and those evaluating the corrective action proposals.of 1

i the Applicant -- will complete their work?

Chiefs make s

deadlines.

Underlin'gs have " hopeful" completion dates.

Why

{

doesn't the Staff produce the affidavit of the real person in 1

charge to pin down when the work will be completed?

Or is Mr.

Noonen really in charge but the affidavit was the work of Staff lawyers who were unwilling to let Mr. Noonan tell the whole truth l

which would abandon " optimistic" (Noonan affidavit, p.

3) best P

l estimates which would not serve Staff counsel's strategy for 1

By letter dated January 14, 1985 served on the Board and

's parties CASE advised-the Staff of its view that an affidavit articulating the basis for any claims regarding a need for delay from the person in charge should be filed with a request for an extension of time.

Based on representations made by Staff counsel we assumed Mr. Noonan was in charge of all phases of the CPSES review and final decisions on licensing issues but the affidavit submitted neither confirms that fact nor reads like the views of someone in charge.

i J

+ ~ -

r g

g y

k.

~

^

I

~v piecemeal extensions.

Second, the Noonan affidavit contains several unexplained i

anomolies..For instance, in paragraph 2 (pp.-1-2) he describes

~

[

three-TRT letters (September 18, November 29, 1984 and' January 8, 1 1985).

All are described as status reports and all as asking for additional information from Applicant but pnly the January 8 letter is described as presenting " preliminary views" regarding

'its content.

That qualifier does not appear anywhere in the

'In j

report.which accompanies the letter or in the letter itself.

fact, in the January 9, 1985 Board Notification (BN 85-01) Mr.

I Darrell G. Eisenhut states:

I By Board Notification 84-160, the staff provided the Comanche Peak Technical Review Team (TRT) requests for l

additional information in the electrical / instrumentation, t

civil / structural, and test programs areas.

By Board

.i Notification 84-185, the staff provided the TRT's status on

~

the protective coatings review and requests for additional

'information in the mechanical and miscellaneous areas.

The

j TRT recently issued the above subject letter which provides j

the TRT's findings on the Quality Assurance / Quality Control a

at Comanche Peak.

(emphasis added)

~

1

]

How did the January 8 letter and report become

" preliminary"? We thought the draft letter (copy attached to our Motion) which ordered Applicant to take corrective actions was Q

ll preliminary and the final letter was just that, final.~'

h I

In addition, what significance is attached to the r'eference to the " letter"?

The real meat was in the accompanying TRT findings.

Is the Noonan affidavit deliberately ignoring that '-

part of the whole document when it describes the transmittals?

h j

Surely the TRT findings are not preliminary nor is additional i

information required bp the TRT to complete its work.

The f

additional information is for the Applicant to tell the Staff L

i l

L z +.

_2_;

=

-- - y--

w.

~~c : =

n-

~

a -

]

4 1

i i,

i

~ ~ i iwhat it is going to do about the problems found by the TRT.

That i

is much different.than the staff saying "we need more informationf to decide wheth'er Applicant has a problem.

In. reality the Staff is attempting to accomplish through this illegimate delay that which it canno,t win by legitimate

)

l l

argument.

The facts.as to the history and. current status of the

~

t quality assurance breakdown are not disputed.

The only reasonable question remaining is whether the plant can be salvaged through remedial efforts.

The Staff has, albeit de facto, withdrawn its reasonable.

assurance about Comanche Peak proffered in earlier proposed findings of fact (Staff Preliminary Proposed Findings of Fact, 9/4/84); yet it refuses to do so publicly and honestly.

Inster d' t

it seeks to postpone the Board's function by continual foot-5 dragg5.ng and excuses until it can once again arrive -- by some

. twist of Staff reform plans and Applicant's new formal corrective

]

i efforts -- back at the formal position it has never budged from i

in front of the Board.

4 1

Without discovery, which may become necessary if this j

ontinues, we can only speculate on what is really gciing 1

he best explanation that reconciles the facts is that at

)

on.

k CPSES the Staff is faced with the hither to unthinkable -- a h

j comp

}

All this delay is to allow those whose careers have been built on the premise that such an event

)

l would never occur to find a way out.

There.is no substantively h

4 defensible delay being sought here.

The necessary facts are in

~

.~x -

u:

• i

~.

(as outlined in our motion)'and they point to an inevitable conclusion.

If the Staff can now give a best estimate of when it will complete the SSERs it can give a best estimate of what the y

J present' evidence means.

It'cannot be seriously questioned that if preliminary in'ormation in'dicated everything is okay with 3

f 1

1

.t CPSES the Staff would promptly issue SSERs or give best estimates

}

,of its views and urge prompt resolution of outstanding issues.

.j See Argument C infra.

The Staff knows what the facts show and *

,1 this Board should order them to divulge that conclusion now and l

resolve CASE's motion or resolve the motion without awaiting further Staff response.

0 B.

The Board Should Not Await Staff Development i

Of Its Ultimate Position

~The Commission has evolved a policy that in special cases

' the Board should postpone resolution of certain issues until the 1

Staff has completed its work.

Commonwealth Edison Company (Byron

~

i 1 and 2) ALAB-770, May 7, 1984, pp. 8-9.

that licensing hearings should not q

i e delayed awaiting informat on from the Staff and that, j

Intervenors, although often relying ori investigations by, the

]

Staff to confirm their concerns, must nonetheless rush to

i j

hearings withou that information.

The Staff now urges rejection s

of this principle on the basis that its opinions, as opposed to the facts underlying those opinions, must be available before a

,4 final decision on an Intervenor motion can be reached.

We submit in such a case there is even more reason to, adhere to the general Commission policy that hea' rings do not await completion of the 1.

c-

Staff review.

Admittedly th'e final Staff view on the ultimate issues in this case will be relevant.

The question now is: whether those final positions are essential to resolve the present motion?

We believe not.

The Essues pres ~ented by the moti.on ares whether ate and wha't m'ust Applicant do if the it wishes to continue to seek a license for the plant in the face 2

of that finding?

The Board must decide these issues and the,

The real o

bases for resolution of the issues are the facts contained in Staff and other documents already released relating to the breadth and depth of the failure of the Applicant's QA/QC program te detect and correct construction defects.

Thus the criti~cai information required from the Staff is already available and

, nothing in the Staff Motion suggests to the contrary.

The Noonan affidavit mentions that the TRT " completed the major portion of

~

its onsite inspection activities by the end of October, 1984" (p.

1).

We know Region IV has already concluded, based on its inspections, that a complete reinspection program is required.

(January 18, 1985 letter to M.D. Spence from R. Martin')' Only the I

headquarters Staff has found it necessary to layer on top of the 2

Contrary to the Staff asrertions these are not the ultimate, issues in the case.

The. ultimate issue is whether to license the plant.

The CASE motion seeks early resolution of a much more-?

preliminary issues what kind of evidence must Applicant present if it is to prevail on the ultimate issue of whether the plant

~

was built in accordance with appropriate design.

Another penultimate issue is whether the design itself was acceptable and based on the most recent CYGNA letter the ' answer is that the-design is not acceptable.

Letter from N.H. Williams to J.B.

{

George, February 19, 1985 (CYGNA letter 84042.035).

I I

=_-_n-

.___________________u_:-__=__-

x _- _::

_ _ _ _ _ = _ _ _. _:_ _ _ __ :

N

.. s _

~ ~~

-9_

f findings of the TRT, an SSER, a task force panel and indeterminate evaluations of Applicant's response proposals L

k before deci' ding whether a complete reinspection is required.

Whatever value those reviews may have for the Staff this Board han the necessary information before it isow to resolve CASE's motion and should proceed to do so with or without a Staff response.

e C.

Even If The Staff Normally Has The Right To

~

Delay Board Resolution Of Issues Pending l

Development Of Final Staff Positions, It

,t Has' Waived That Right Here l

l On September 20, 1984 the Staff offered into evidence in this proceeding what it purported was the Staff's final position j

on harassment and intimidation.

TR. 18,033-34 That offer consisted of a report prepared by EG&G, a consultant to the TRT, 1

and was based on a review of tihe evidentiary record developed

)

?

during the summer of 1984'and other pre-existing Staff inspection 1

reports and documents.

CASE objected that the document could not be a final Staff position because the harassment and intimidation I

hearing was far from concluded and TRT and OI investigations were f

also not completed.

(TR. 18,057-58; 18,061-62; 18,080-8rl)

Staff counsel stated that while dG&G rembers would review subsequent E

transcripts and information this was the final position and it,-

was unlikely 'to be changed. (TR. 18,043, 18,054)

The Board t

t Chairman stated that the document was received in evidence only 3

(

because of the Staff representation that it was a final position and not an interim position (TR. 18,072-73, 18,078) although I

there was some question that it was the final Staff position (TR.

h

1

{

y.

L-18,082-83).

By its. ctions with,the EG&G. eport St, ff made clear that it a

r a

does not 'nedd to await even final SSERs, much less task force f

3

reviews, to develop and state a final posit, ion.

In fact there was no attempt by,'the Staff to even conduct any substantial independent evaluation of the EG&G report or present a separate Staff authored articulation of the Staff position on harassment I

{

and intimidation.

How then does the Staff now insist on the

~

i multiple layers of review before articulating its final view on other TRT issues? As noted above the only difference in the two cases is that the EG&G report was supportive of licensing and the three TRT reports support the denial of a license and/or a i

reinspection program.

l W'e believe this Board should reject any attempt by the Staff i

-to establish the principle that it can take its positions based on the fashion and not the facts and thus delay taking positions on issues when the position will be unfavorable to Applicant and rush to present positions when they support Applicant.

There is neither logic nor justice in such a policy.

The Staff has 8

3 Significantly when the Harassment and Intimidation Panel was established no mention was made of the EG&G report or of the Staff representation that it was the final position of the Staff on the harassment and intimidation issue.

Were the Staff operating honorably here the EG&G report would long ago have b'(en withdrawn and subjected to the same scrutiny applied to other'TRT reports that are more obviously unfavorable to the Applicant.

Instead Staff representations of last september, the establish-ment of the Harassment and Intimidation Panel and the decision to

[

allow Mr. Noonan to make the final decision on all of the

]

licensing issues for the Staff have been allowed to remain unreconciled.

j h

y

}

}

)-

_ 11 _

I already represented that it does not need to await all Staff

'i unlike the I

reviews to articulate its final positions even when, l

' ~

I present s'ituation, all the n'ecessary relevant facts are not yet a vail'abl.e.

It should be held to that representation here.

D.

Remedy ~

We request that the Board issue an order denying the Staff motion f6r extension of time and directing the Staff to file its response, if any, to the CASE Motion by March 1, 1985.

Respectfully submitted, 3 - $

I ANTHONY %.'ROISMAN A I

BILLIE GARDE

[

Trial Lawyers for Public Justice, P.C.

l 2000 P Street, N.W.,

Suite 611 Washington, D.C.

20036 i

(202) 463-8600 Counsel for CASE i

l

)

I a

4 i

6 i

i

~

W-

= - -

T

)

f = = * * *

~

i r

t l

t February 25, 1985 s'

1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

~ ~~

l

.~

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION j'

BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD'

~

r l

'In the Matter of

')

.)

~

~

TEXAS UTILITIES GENERATING

)

i COMPANY, et al.

)

Docket Nos. 50-445-2

)

and 50-446-2 f

• (Comanche Peak Steam Electric

)

Station, Units 1 and 2)

)

l

\\

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE p

1 By my signature below, I hereby certify that true and correct copies of CASE's Opposition To Staff Motion For

[

Indefinite Extension Of Time have been sent to the names liJted

, below this 4th day of February, 1985, by:

Express mail where i

l indicated by *r Hand-delivery where indicated by **; and First i

Class Mail unless otherwise indicated.

Administrative Judge Peter B. Bloch j

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 4350 East-West Highway, 4th Floor i

L Bethesda, Maryland 20814 Herbert Grossman Alternate Chairman f

ASLB Panel U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 4350 East-West Highway, 4th Floor Bethesda, Maryland 20814

-?

Dr. Kenneth A. McCollom, Dean Division of Engineering, Architecture and Technology Oklahoma State University Stillwater, Oklahoma 74074

~

F---

.=-_

_ __ _n m.-

h f

$0&WIU V a n:

l

1. o UNITED sTATds j

- [MQ g

g NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION O cN W 4 c-

l y,

wAsmNGTON, D. C. 20555 f

hEB 2 81985 hf

}

we JL MEMORANDUM FOR:

Those on Attached List Me w

FROM:

William J. Dircks j

Executive Director for Operations 3

SUBJECT:

PANEL TO PREPARE NRC STAFF POSITION ON COMANCHE PEAK HEARING CONTENTION NO. 5

)

On December 24, 1984, I established the subject panel and provided initial guidance regarding,its charter. Since that time, the charter and the panel l

composition have been clarified t6 reflect a broader range of expertise and to accommodate agency priorities. This memorandum reflects the panel's j

charter and changes.

To properly assist the Director, Comanche Peak Project in evaluating Contention 5 and to assist him in the preparation of a comprehensive staff

{1 position on Contention 5, a panel composed of senior managers has been formed. The panel is composed of the following individuals:

l EdwardJordan,IE(Chairperson) 3 Richard Vollmer, IE I

Alan Herdt, R-II Robert Warnick, R-III James Sniezek, DEDROGR Ashok Thadani, NRR r

This contention concerns the applicant's adherence to QA/QC requiriments and is provided as Enclosure 1.

The issue of construction QA/QC at Conanche Peak is multifaceted Ad is addressed, in part, by many records, documents and in testimony from various sources including the staff, applicant, intervenor, and allegers. The. background of this contention and associated records span g

several years. Various NRC offices have been involved, including Region IV, OI, NRR, OELD and IE. Because of their involvement with Comanche Peak regu-(

latory activities, I am appointing the following personnel as resource support

[.

to the panel in their areas of expertise:

Joe Scinto, OELD 1

Vince Noonan, NRR

(

Thomas Ippolito, AEOD j

\\ /\\

l James Gagliardo, IE 7'" v s

" i a

Brooks Griffin, OI lt Dorwin Hunter, R-IV

)

L.Chet Poslusny, NRR*

f Ted Sullivan, NRR*

? ? M ft !

-w J rj

• Administrative and technical support as requested by Panel Chairman u

g-

7

[

[;

n 2-

,L rr.

(

These individuals may be asked to assist in this effort when issues involving

~their specific area of expertise are being considered, and I request your support in making them available on an "as-needed" basis, i

The product of this effort will be the assistance to the Director, Comanche Peak Project, in preparing a positton that integrates the staff findings a.,d conclusions regarding this Contention.

In addition this effort may require panel members, or the panel as a whole, to be prepared to testify concerning i

panel recommendations. in support of the staff position on Contention 5 as a

identified by the Director, Comanche Peak Project. Enclosure 2 provides the f.

charter for the panel.

l The work schedule of the panel as. developed,by the Director, Comanche Peak Project, is to be consistent with the hearing schedule and shall be closely coordinated with ELD.

I The panel will work under the direction of Vincent S. Noonan, Director, Comanche Peak Project, and should provide periodic status briefings to the Deputy Director, NRR.

/

j i

IM\\

l Willia ircks Executive Director for Operations 1

I j

Enclosures:

As stated cc: Panel Members Panel Resource Personnel T. Murley o

i J. Martin t

t k

y V

I; I

1v,

+ -.

_ -.. a._.

r, Y

l

=

.I ADDRESSEES FOR MEMORANDUM DATED FEB 2 s 1985 l

Victor Stello, Jr. DEDROGR Harold R. Denton, NRR

(

James Taylor, IE Guy H. Cunningham, III, ELD Clemens J. Heltemes, AEOD Nelson Grace, RII James Keppler, RIII Robert Martin, RIV t.

Ben Hayes, OI i

I j

l i

s i

s t

\\

e e

A ae

'g h

--. -.n. -

. =.

- ~ =

}

c i,

r f

e i

f ENCLOSURE 1 s

COMANCHE PEAK CONTENTION 5*

9 Contention 5.

The Applicants' failure to adhere to the quality assurance /

(

quality control provisions required by the construction permits for Comanche Peak, Units 1 and 2, and the requirerr.ents of Appendix B of 10 CFR Part 50, and the' construction practices employed, specifically in regard to concrete work, j

mortar blocks, steel, fracture toughness testing, expansion joints, placement i

of the reactor vessel for Unit 2, welding, inspection and testing, materials used, craft labor qualifications and working conditions (as they may affect j

QA/QC) and training and organization of QA/QC personnel, have raised substantial J

questions as' to the adequacy of the construction of the facility. As a result, the Comission cannot make the findings required by 10 CFR 50.57(a) necessa.y for issuance of an operating license for Comanche Peak.

(CFUR 4A-ACORN 14-CASE 19 JOINT Contention) 1j P

{

p l

fi 1

b t

i i

i

~

rr l,.

1

• Reproduced from Board Order Subsequent to the Prehearing Conference of

{t April 30, 1980 (dated June 16,1980) k G

r j

j

\\

i l

ENCLOSURE 2 COMANCHE PEAK CONTENTION 5 PANEL CHARTER

[

I.

PURPOSE The purpose of this panel is to assist the Director, Comanche Peak 1

Project, to evaluate in an integrated manner the information developed by the staff which bears upon QA/QC and overall plant quality. The j

objectives are:

A.

To assis't the Director,' Comanche Peak Project to make the staff determination regarding the findings required by 10 CFR 50.57(a) as related to Contention 5.

B.

To provide an integrated review and feedback to the Director, Comanche Peak Project, on information bearing on Contention 5 along with the identification of problem areas and appropriate recomendations for NRC actions or proposed solutions.

[

C.

To be prepared to testify as needed individually or-as..a panel, 1

concerning panel recomendations in support of the staff position f

on Contention 5 as identified by the Director.

II. MEMBERSHIP j

f EdwardJordan.IE(Chairperson)

{

Richard Vollmer IE L

Alan Herdt, P-II Robert Warns.k. R-III James Sniezek, DEDROGR Ashok Thadani, NRR f

III. PANEL SCOPE A.

Under tt guidance of the Director, Comanche Peak Project the t

panel shall become familiar with and consider findings of past l

and current NRC staff activities and applicant actions in response to NRC findings as they relate to the matters addressed in Contentio, 5.

Srecifically, the panel shall consider the results i

of:

E I

1)

Region IV inspections f

2)

CAT inspections I

t

!(r p

4 vc

=

-,._ -.=

A i

f; 2

3 OI investigations 4

Technical Review Team inspections

~

[

5 Enforcement actions 6

Special Review Team inspection 7

SALP reports j-8 Staff analysis of CYGNA Report 9

Staff sumary of the Hearing Record t

Additionally, the panel may examine the result of other staff

'~

activities which may bear on their findings related to Contention 5 ff directed to do so.

B.

The Director, Comanche Peak Project will arrange for staff members d

to brief the panel on findings related to Contention 5.

The Director will also set up meetings with the intervenor and the applicant to discuss matters which they respectively believe are most significant as related to Contention 5.

Any such meetings will be open to the public. The panel should properly characterize the collective concerns raised by the staff, intervenor and applicant and review / comment on the applicants plan to address these concerns. The panel should then advise the Director, Comanche Peak Project on its recomendations.

y C.

During conduct of panel activities, the panel should advise the Director, Comanche Peak Project of areas where it appears additional

'NRC activity may be warranted in order to address the issues raised in Contention 5.

IV. PANEL OPERATING PROCEDURES A.

Panel meetings will be held as established by the Chairperson. The Director, Comanche Peak Project will arrange all meetings with the f

applicant, intervenor or allegers. Meetings with NRC staff and.

[

staff consultants shall be considered predecisional.

t

[

B.

A quorum for conduct of panel business will consist of frur members.

g In the temporary absence of the Chairperson, the Chairperson may designate an acting Chairperson.

[

C.

Briefings by the principal NRC reviewers in each of the areas identi-fled in Section III.A will be obtained. Reviewers will sumarize the h

scope of their reviews, deficiencies noted, root causes of such L

deficiencies and applicant corrective actions. Likewise, the reviewers

,are to discuss those areas where no deficiencies were found.

[

D.

The panel should analyze the information presented by NRC reviewers r

contained in source documents which the panel reviews, obtained by I

discussio s with the applicant, intervenor and staff and observed

}

during site reviews in arriving at its recommendations regarding

)

Contention 5 and should continually provide feedback to the d

Director, Comanche Peak Project.

L n

"NEdwmm..'

,y

^j~

"N'@W*W N"

"N

' ~- -

-7

[(

[

I 3

i f

E.

The panel should keep apprised of the ongoing agency activities

[

related to Contention 5 and promptly identify conflicts or problems r

to the Director, Comanche Peak Project.

V.

RECORD AND REPORTING A.

The panel will work u'nder the direction of Vincent S. Noonan,

}

Director of the Comanche Peak Project, and should provide periodic status briefings to the Deputy Director, NRR.

3 B.

The panel shall keep such records of activities to assist it in

1 arriving at recommendations regarding Contention 5, as requested by the D.irector. Such records shall be considered predecisional until staff-testimony regarding C'ontention 5 is provided to the Hearing Board.

e h

I 1

[

1 l

- _ = -.

__ _ -