ML15231A554: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(9 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
| issue date = 08/18/2015
| issue date = 08/18/2015
| title = Ltr. 08/18/15 Donald C. Cook Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2 - Request for Information for an NRC Triennial Pilot Baseline Component Design Bases Inspection (Inspection Report 05000315/2015008; 05000316/2015008) (Axd)
| title = Ltr. 08/18/15 Donald C. Cook Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2 - Request for Information for an NRC Triennial Pilot Baseline Component Design Bases Inspection (Inspection Report 05000315/2015008; 05000316/2015008) (Axd)
| author name = Lipa C A
| author name = Lipa C
| author affiliation = NRC/RGN-III/DRS/EB2
| author affiliation = NRC/RGN-III/DRS/EB2
| addressee name = Weber L
| addressee name = Weber L
Line 14: Line 14:
| page count = 8
| page count = 8
}}
}}
See also: [[followed by::IR 05000315/2015008]]
See also: [[see also::IR 05000315/2015008]]


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:
{{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES
[[Issue date::August 18, 2015]]
                              NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
                                                REGION III
                                      2443 WARRENVILLE RD. SUITE 210
                                            LISLE, IL 60532-4352
                                            August 18, 2015
Mr. Larry Weber
Senior VP and Chief Nuclear Officer
Indiana Michigan Power Company
Nuclear Generation Group
One Cook Place
Bridgman, MI 49106
SUBJECT: DONALD. C. COOK NUCLEAR POWER PLANT, UNITS 1 AND 2 - REQUEST
              FOR INFORMATION FOR AN NRC TRIENNIAL PILOT BASELINE COMPONENT
              DESIGN BASES INSPECTION (INSPECTION REPORT 05000315/2015008;
              05000316/2015008)
Dear Mr. Weber:
On November 2, 2015, the U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) will begin the team
portion of the triennial pilot baseline Component Design Bases Inspection (CDBI) at Donald C.
Cook Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2. This inspection will be performed in accordance with
NRC Baseline Inspection Procedure 71111.21T. A team of six inspectors will perform this
2-week onsite pilot inspection.
The CDBI focuses on the design, maintenance, and operation of risk-significant components
associated with one or more accident scenario or systems. The components to be reviewed
during this baseline inspection will be identified during the in-office preparation weeks that occur
prior to the first onsite inspection week. In addition, operating experience issues, associated
with the component samples, will also be selected for review. The inspection team may request
scenarios to be performed on the simulator. This request would require support from your
simulator staff to validate scenarios, simulator time, and a crew to perform the actions, which
would most likely occur during the second onsite week. The team will work closely with your
staff early on during the inspection process to ensure this activity can be accomplished with
minimal impact.
This pilot inspection will include two weeks onsite. The inspection team will consist of six NRC
inspectors, of which five will focus on engineering/maintenance and one on operations. The
current inspection schedule is as follows:
*  Preparatory weeks:                   October 19 -23, 2015; and
                                        October 26 - 30, 2015.
*  On-site inspection weeks:            November 2 - 6, 2015; and
                                        November 16 - 20, 2015.


Mr. Larry Weber Senior VP and Chief Nuclear Officer Indiana Michigan Power Company Nuclear Generation Group One Cook Place Bridgman, MI 49106
L. Weber                                      -2-
Experience with previous baseline design inspections of similar depth and length has shown
that this type of inspection is extremely resource intensive, both for the NRC inspectors and the
licensee staff. In order to minimize the inspection impact on the site, and to ensure a productive
inspection for both parties, we have enclosed a request for information needed for the
inspection.
It is important that all of these documents are up to date and complete in order to minimize the
number of additional documents requested during the preparation and/or the onsite portions of
the inspection. Insofar as possible, this information should be provided electronically to the lead
inspector. The information request has been divided into three groups:
*    The first group lists information necessary for our initial inspection scoping activities.
    This information should be provided to the lead inspector no later than September 14, 2015.
    By September 30, 2015, the lead inspector will communicate the initial selected set of
    approximately 10 components.
*    The second group of documents requested is those items needed to support our in-office
    preparation activities. This set of documents, including the calculations associated with the
    initial selected components, should be provided to the lead inspector at the Regional Office
    no later than October 14, 2015. During the in-office preparation activities, the team may
    identify additional information needed to support the inspection.
*    The last group includes the additional information above as well as plant specific reference
    material. This information should be available to the team onsite on November 2, 2015. It is
    also requested that corrective action documents and/or questions developed during the
    inspection be provided to the lead inspector as the documents are generated.
The lead inspector for this inspection is Mr. Néstor Féliz-Adorno. We understand that our
licensing contact for this inspection is Mr. John Nimtz of your organization. If there are any
questions about the inspection or the material requested in the enclosure, please contact the
lead inspector at (630) 829-9739, or via e-mail at Nestor.Feliz-Adorno@nrc.gov.
This letter does not contain new or amended information collection requirements subject
to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). Existing information
collection requirements were approved by the Office of Management and Budget, Control
Number 3150-0011. The NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required
to respond to, a request for information or an information collection requirement unless the
requesting document displays a currently valid Office of Management and Budget Control
Number.


SUBJECT: DONALD. C. COOK NUCLEAR POWER PLANT, UNITS 1 AND 2 - REQUEST FOR INFORMATION FOR AN NRC TRIENNIAL PILOT BASELINE COMPONENT DESIGN BASES INSPECTION (INSPECTION REPORT 05000315/2015008; 05000316/2015008)
L. Weber                                      -3-
In accordance with Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) 2.390, Public
Inspections, Exemptions, Requests for Withholding, of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy
of this letter, its enclosure, and your response (if any) will be available electronically for public
inspection in the NRCs Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS)
component of the NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS).
ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html
(the Public Electronic Reading Room).
                                              Sincerely,
                                              /RA/
                                              Christine A. Lipa, Chief
                                              Engineering Branch 2
                                              Division of Reactor Safety
Docket Nos. 50-315; 50-316
License Nos. DPR-58; DPR-74
Enclosure:
  Information Request for Component Design Bases Inspection
c w/encl: Distribution via LISTSERV


==Dear Mr. Weber:==
        INFORMATION REQUEST FOR COMPONENT DESIGN BASES INSPECTION
On November 2, 2015, the U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) will begin the team portion of the triennial pilot baseline Component Design Bases Inspection (CDBI) at Donald C. Cook Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2. This inspection will be performed in accordance with NRC Baseline Inspection Procedure 71111.21T. A team of six inspectors will perform this 2-week onsite pilot inspection. The CDBI focuses on the design, maintenance, and operation of risk-significant components associated with one or more accident scenario or systems. The components to be reviewed during this baseline inspection will be identified during the in-office preparation weeks that occur prior to the first onsite inspection week. In addition, operating experience issues, associated with the component samples, will also be selected for review. The inspection team may request scenarios to be performed on the simulator. This request would require support from your simulator staff to validate scenarios, simulator time, and a crew to perform the actions, which would most likely occur during the second onsite week. The team will work closely with your staff early on during the inspection process to ensure this activity can be accomplished with minimal impact. This pilot inspection will include two weeks onsite. The inspection team will consist of six NRC inspectors, of which five will focus on engineering/maintenance and one on operations. The current inspection schedule is as follows: Preparatory weeks: October 19 -23, 2015; and October 26 - 30, 2015. On-site inspection weeks: November 2 - 6, 2015; and November 16 - 20, 2015. Experience with previous baseline design inspections of similar depth and length has shown that this type of inspection is extremely resource intensive, both for the NRC inspectors and the licensee staff. In order to minimize the inspection impact on the site, and to ensure a productive inspection for both parties, we have enclosed a request for information needed for the inspection. It is important that all of these documents are up to date and complete in order to minimize the number of additional documents requested during the preparation and/or the onsite portions of the inspection. Insofar as possible, this information should be provided electronically to the lead inspector. The information request has been divided into three groups: The first group lists information necessary for our initial inspection scoping activities. This information should be provided to the lead inspector no later than September 14, 2015. By September 30, 2015, the lead inspector will communicate the initial selected set of approximately 10 components. The second group of documents requested is those items needed to support our in-office preparation activities. This set of documents, including the calculations associated with the initial selected components, should be provided to the lead inspector at the Regional Office no later than October 14, 2015. During the in-office preparation activities, the team may identify additional information needed to support the inspection. The last group includes the additional information above as well as plant specific reference material. This information should be available to the team onsite on November 2, 2015. It is also requested that corrective action documents and/or questions developed during the inspection be provided to the lead inspector as the documents are generated. The lead inspector for this inspection is Mr. Néstor Féliz-Adorno. We understand that our licensing contact for this inspection is Mr. John Nimtz of your organization. If there are any questions about the inspection or the material requested in the enclosure, please contact the lead inspector at (630) 829-9739, or via e-mail at Nestor.Feliz-Adorno@nrc.gov. This letter does not contain new or amended information collection requirements subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). Existing information collection requirements were approved by the Office of Management and Budget, Control Number 3150-0011. The NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a request for information or an information collection requirement unless the requesting document displays a currently valid Office of Management and Budget Control Number. In accordance with Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) 2.390, "Public Inspections, Exemptions, Requests for Withholding," of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter, its enclosure, and your response (if any) will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC's Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of the NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).
Inspection Report:               05000315/2015008; 05000316/2015008
Inspection Dates:                November 2 - 6, 2015; and
                                November 16 - 20, 2015.
Inspection Procedure:            IP 71111.21T, Component Design Bases Inspection (Teams)
Lead Inspector:                  Néstor Féliz Adorno, Senior Reactor Engineer, DRS
                                (630) 829-9739
                                Nestor.Feliz-Adorno@nrc.gov
I.     Information Requested Prior to the Onsite Information Gathering/Inspection Week
      The following information is requested by September 14, 2015, or sooner, to facilitate
      inspection preparation. If you have any questions regarding this information, please
      call the team leader as soon as possible. (Please provide the information electronically
      in pdf files, Excel, or other searchable formats, preferably on some portable electronic
      media (e.g., CDROM, DVD, flash drive, etc.). The portable electronic media should
      contain descriptive names, and be indexed and hyperlinked to facilitate ease of use.
      Information in lists should contain enough information to be easily understood by
      someone who has knowledge of light water reactor technology).
      1. Risk-ranking of top 250 components from your site specific Probabilistic Safety
          Analysis (PSA) sorted by Risk-Achievement Worth (RAW). Include values for
          Birnbaum Importance, Risk-Reduction Worth, and Fussell-Veseley (as applicable).
      2. Risk-ranking of top 100 containment-related components (i.e. Large Early Release
            Frequency (LERF)) from your site specific PSA sorted by RAW.
      3. Provide a list of the top 200 cut-sets from your PSA.
      4. Provide a list of the top 100 cut-sets for each initiator modeled in the PSA that
            contributes more than 5 percent to the baseline plant core damage frequency.
      5. Copies of PSA system notebooks, and latest PSA summary document.
      6. List of time critical operator actions. Identify those actions that do not have job
          performance measures.
      7. Provide copies of the emergency operating procedures.
      8. If you have an External Events or Fire PSA Model, provide the information requested
          in Items 1 and 2 for external events and fire. Provide narrative description of each
          coded event (including fire, flood zone description).
                                                                                        Enclosure


Sincerely,/RA/ Christine A. Lipa, Chief Engineering Branch 2 Division of Reactor Safety Docket Nos. 50-315; 50-316 License Nos. DPR-58; DPR-74
    INFORMATION REQUEST FOR COMPONENT DESIGN BASES INSPECTION
    9. Electronic copy of the site Individual Plant Examination of External Events,
        if available.
    10. Any pre-existing evaluation or list of components and associated calculations with
        low-design margins, (i.e., pumps closest to the design limit for flow or pressure,
        diesel generator close to design required output, heat exchangers close to rated
        design heat removal etc.).
    11. List of available design (setup) margins in both the open and closed direction
        (identify safety-related direction) for valves in the Motor-Operated Valve and
        Air-Operated Valve Programs. Identify the basis for how the margin was determined.
    12. List of high-risk Maintenance Rule systems/components based on engineering or
        expert panel judgment (i.e., those systems/components not identified in the PRA).
    13. Structures, systems, and components in the Maintenance Rule (a)(1) category for
        the last 3 years.
    14. Site top 10 issues list (if applicable).
    15. A list of operating experience evaluations for the last 3 years.
    16. Information of any common cause failure of components experienced in the last
        5 years at your facility.
    17. List of Root Cause Evaluations associated with component failures or design issues
        initiated/completed in the last five years.
    18. List of open operability evaluations.
    19. List of components/systems considered operable but degraded/nonconforming.
    20. Current management and engineering organizational chart.
    21. Electronic copies of Updated Final Safety Analysis Report, Technical Specifications,
        Technical Specifications Bases, and Technical Requirements Manual.
    22. Major one line electrical drawings (ac and dc), and key diagrams (paper copies).
    23. Electronic copy of Piping and Instrumentation Drawings (P&IDs) (if available).
II. Information Requested (for the approximate 10 selected components) to be
    Available by October 14, 2015, (will be reviewed by the team in the Regional
    office during the weeks of October 19 - 23, 2015, and October 26 - 30, 2015).
    This information should be separated for each selected component, especially if
    provided electronically (e.g., folder with component name that includes calculations,
    condition reports, maintenance history, etc.).
    1. List of condition reports (corrective action documents) associated with each of the
        selected components for the last 6 years.
                                                2


===Enclosure:===
INFORMATION REQUEST FOR COMPONENT DESIGN BASES INSPECTION
Information Request for Component Design Bases Inspection c w/encl: Distribution via LISTSERV INFORMATION REQUEST FOR COMPONENT DESIGN BASES INSPECTION Enclosure Inspection Report: 05000315/2015008; 05000316/2015008 Inspection Dates: November 2 - 6, 2015; and November 16 - 20, 2015. Inspection Procedure: IP 71111.21T, "Component Design Bases Inspection (Teams)" Lead Inspector: Néstor Féliz Adorno, Senior Reactor Engineer, DRS (630) 829-9739 Nestor.Feliz-Adorno@nrc.gov I. Information Requested Prior to the Onsite Information Gathering/Inspection Week The following information is requested by September 14, 2015, or sooner, to facilitate inspection preparation. If you have any questions regarding this information, please call the team leader as soon as possible. (Please provide the information electronically in "pdf" files, Excel, or other searchable formats, preferably on some portable electronic media (e.g., CDROM, DVD, flash drive, etc.). The portable electronic media should contain descriptive names, and be indexed and hyperlinked to facilitate ease of use. Information in "lists" should contain enough information to be easily understood by someone who has knowledge of light water reactor technology). 1. Risk-ranking of top 250 components from your site specific Probabilistic Safety Analysis (PSA) sorted by Risk-Achievement Worth (RAW). Include values for Birnbaum Importance, Risk-Reduction Worth, and Fussell-Veseley (as applicable). 2. Risk-ranking of top 100 containment-related components (i.e. Large Early Release Frequency (LERF)) from your site specific PSA sorted by RAW. 3. Provide a list of the top 200 cut-sets from your PSA. 4. Provide a list of the top 100 cut-sets for each initiator modeled in the PSA that contributes more than 5 percent to the baseline plant core damage frequency. 5. Copies of PSA "system notebooks," and latest PSA summary document. 6. List of time critical operator actions. Identify those actions that do not have job performance measures. 7. Provide copies of the emergency operating procedures. 8. If you have an External Events or Fire PSA Model, provide the information requested in Items 1 and 2 for external events and fire. Provide narrative description of each coded event (including fire, flood zone description).
2. The maintenance history (corrective, preventive, and elective) associated with each
    of the selected components for the last 10 years. Identify frequency of preventive
    maintenance activities.
3. Copies of calculations associated with each of the selected components (if not
    previously provided), excluding data files. Please review the calculations and also
    provide copies of important referenced material (such as drawings, engineering
    requests, and vendor letters). Pipe stress calculations are excluded from this
    request.
4. System Health Reports, System Descriptions, Design Basis Documents, and/or
    Training Lesson Plans associated with each of the selected components.
5. A list of modifications, including equivalency evaluations and setpoint changes,
    associated with each of the selected components. This list should include a
    descriptive paragraph on the purpose of the modification. Please ensure this list
    only includes design completed (not canceled) modifications.
6. Copies of operability evaluations (open/closed for last 3 years) associated with
    each of the selected components and plans for restoring operability, if applicable.
7. Copies of selected operator work-around evaluations associated with each of the
    selected components and plans for resolution, if applicable.
8. Copies of any open temporary modifications associated with each of the selected
    components, if applicable.
9. Copy of latest completed surveillance tests for each component (e.g., for pumps this
    would include: comprehensive test, quarterly test, flow balance, etc.; for valves:
    stroke time testing, diagnostic testing, leak testing, etc.). Acceptance criteria basis
    calculations should also be included.
10. Provide copies of the normal and abnormal operating procedures associated with the
    selected components and selected scenarios.
11. A copy of any internal/external self-assessments and associated corrective action
    documents generated in preparation for the inspection.
12. Copy of the last three completed tests and surveillances for each component, for
    example:
        *  Pumps: comprehensive test, quarterly test, flow balance, etc.
        *  Valves: stroke time testing, diagnostic testing, leak testing, interlocks, etc.
        *  Heat Exchangers/room coolers: thermal performance, clean/inspect, fan
            flows, etc.
        Acceptance criteria basis calculations should also be included.
13. A copy of engineering/operations related audits completed in the last 2 years.
                                          3


INFORMATION REQUEST FOR COMPONENT DESIGN BASES INSPECTION 2 9. Electronic copy of the site Individual Plant Examination of External Events, if available. 10. Any pre-existing evaluation or list of components and associated calculations with low-design margins, (i.e., pumps closest to the design limit for flow or pressure, diesel generator close to design required output, heat exchangers close to rated design heat removal etc.). 11. List of available design (setup) margins in both the open and closed direction (identify safety-related direction) for valves in the Motor-Operated Valve and Air-Operated Valve Programs. Identify the basis for how the margin was determined. 12. List of high-risk Maintenance Rule systems/components based on engineering or expert panel judgment (i.e., those systems/components not identified in the PRA). 13. Structures, systems, and components in the Maintenance Rule (a)(1) category for the last 3 years. 14. Site top 10 issues list (if applicable). 15. A list of operating experience evaluations for the last 3 years. 16. Information of any common cause failure of components experienced in the last 5 years at your facility. 17. List of Root Cause Evaluations associated with component failures or design issues initiated/completed in the last five years. 18. List of open operability evaluations. 19. List of components/systems considered operable but degraded/nonconforming. 20. Current management and engineering organizational chart. 21. Electronic copies of Updated Final Safety Analysis Report, Technical Specifications, Technical Specifications Bases, and Technical Requirements Manual. 22. Major one line electrical drawings (ac and dc), and key diagrams (paper copies). 23. Electronic copy of Piping and Instrumentation Drawings (P&IDs) (if available). II. Information Requested (for the approximate 10 selected components) to be Available by October 14, 2015, (will be reviewed by the team in the Regional office during the weeks of October 19 - 23, 2015, and October 26 - 30, 2015). This information should be separated for each selected component, especially if provided electronically (e.g., folder with component name that includes calculations, condition reports, maintenance history, etc.). 1. List of condition reports (corrective action documents) associated with each of the selected components for the last 6 years.
        INFORMATION REQUEST FOR COMPONENT DESIGN BASES INSPECTION
III.    Additional Information to be Provided on November 2, 2015, Onsite (for final
        selected components)
        1. During the in-office preparation activities, the team will be making final selections and
            may identify additional information needed to support the inspection. The lead
            inspector will provide a list of the additional information needed during the week of
            October 19 - 23, 2015.
        2. Schedule of any testing/maintenance activities to be conducted on the selected
            components during the three onsite inspection weeks.
IV.     Information Requested to be Provided Throughout the Inspection
        1. Copies of any corrective action documents generated as a result of the teams
            questions or queries during this inspection.
        2. Copies of the list of questions submitted by the team members and the
            status/resolution of the information requested (provide daily during the inspection to
            each team member).
        3. One complete set of P&IDs (paper copies).
        4. Reference materials. (make available if needed during all on-site weeks):
                *  Individual Plant Examination/ PRA report;
                *  Procurement documents for components selected (verify retrievable);
                *  Plant procedures (normal, abnormal, emergency, surveillance, etc.);
                *  Original Final Safety Analysis Report; and
                *  Vendor manuals.
If you have questions regarding the information requested, please contact the lead inspector.
                                                  4


INFORMATION REQUEST FOR COMPONENT DESIGN BASES INSPECTION 3 2. The maintenance history (corrective, preventive, and elective) associated with each of the selected components for the last 10 years. Identify frequency of preventive maintenance activities. 3. Copies of calculations associated with each of the selected components (if not previously provided), excluding data files. Please review the calculations and also provide copies of important referenced material (such as drawings, engineering requests, and vendor letters). Pipe stress calculations are excluded from this request. 4. System Health Reports, System Descriptions, Design Basis Documents, and/or Training Lesson Plans associated with each of the selected components. 5. A list of modifications, including equivalency evaluations and setpoint changes, associated with each of the selected components. This list should include a descriptive paragraph on the purpose of the modification. Please ensure this list only includes design completed (not canceled) modifications. 6. Copies of operability evaluations (open/closed for last 3 years) associated with each of the selected components and plans for restoring operability, if applicable. 7. Copies of selected operator work-around evaluations associated with each of the selected components and plans for resolution, if applicable. 8. Copies of any open temporary modifications associated with each of the selected components, if applicable. 9. Copy of latest completed surveillance tests for each component (e.g., for pumps this would include: comprehensive test, quarterly test, flow balance, etc.; for valves: stroke time testing, diagnostic testing, leak testing, etc.). Acceptance criteria basis calculations should also be included. 10. Provide copies of the normal and abnormal operating procedures associated with the selected components and selected scenarios. 11. A copy of any internal/external self-assessments and associated corrective action documents generated in preparation for the inspection. 12. Copy of the last three completed tests and surveillances for each component, for example: Pumps: comprehensive test, quarterly test, flow balance, etc. Valves: stroke time testing, diagnostic testing, leak testing, interlocks, etc. Heat Exchangers/room coolers: thermal performance, clean/inspect, fan flows, etc. Acceptance criteria basis calculations should also be included. 13. A copy of engineering/operations related audits completed in the last 2 years.
L. Weber                                                                  -3-
 
In accordance with Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) 2.390, Public
INFORMATION REQUEST FOR COMPONENT DESIGN BASES INSPECTION 4 III. Additional Information to be Provided on November 2, 2015, Onsite (for final selected components) 1. During the in-office preparation activities, the team will be making final selections and may identify additional information needed to support the inspection. The lead inspector will provide a list of the additional information needed during the week of October 19 - 23, 2015. 2. Schedule of any testing/maintenance activities to be conducted on the selected components during the three onsite inspection weeks. IV. Information Requested to be Provided Throughout the Inspection 1. Copies of any corrective action documents generated as a result of the team's questions or queries during this inspection. 2. Copies of the list of questions submitted by the team members and the status/resolution of the information requested (provide daily during the inspection to each team member). 3. One complete set of P&IDs (paper copies). 4. Reference materials. (make available if needed during all on-site weeks): Individual Plant Examination/ PRA report; Procurement documents for components selected (verify retrievable); Plant procedures (normal, abnormal, emergency, surveillance, etc.); Original Final Safety Analysis Report; and Vendor manuals. If you have questions regarding the information requested, please contact the lead inspector.
Inspections, Exemptions, Requests for Withholding, of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy
of this letter, its enclosure, and your response (if any) will be available electronically for public
inspection in the NRCs Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS)
component of the NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS).
ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html
(the Public Electronic Reading Room).
                                                                          Sincerely,
                                                                          /RA/
                                                                          Christine A. Lipa, Chief
                                                                          Engineering Branch 2
                                                                          Division of Reactor Safety
Docket Nos. 50-315; 50-316
License Nos. DPR-58; DPR-74
Enclosure:
  Information Request for Component Design Bases Inspection
c w/encl: Distribution via LISTSERV
DISTRIBUTION w/encl:
Kimyata MorganButler
RidsNrrDorlLpl3-1 Resource
RidsNrrPMDCCook Resource
RidsNrrDirsIrib Resource
Cynthia Pederson
Darrell Roberts
Richard Skokowski
Allan Barker
Carole Ariano
Linda Linn
DRPIII
DRSIII
Jim Clay
Carmen Olteanu
ADAMS Accession Number ML15231A554
    Publicly Available                          Non-Publicly Available                    Sensitive                Non-Sensitive
To receive a copy of this document, indicate in the concurrence box "C" = Copy without attach/encl "E" = Copy with attach/encl "N" = No copy
OFFICE              RIII                                            RIII                      RIII                        RIII
NAME                ADunlop for NFéliz-Adorno:cl CLipa
DATE                08/18/15                                        08/18/15
                                                            OFFICIAL RECORD COPY
}}
}}

Latest revision as of 21:50, 4 December 2019

Ltr. 08/18/15 Donald C. Cook Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2 - Request for Information for an NRC Triennial Pilot Baseline Component Design Bases Inspection (Inspection Report 05000315/2015008; 05000316/2015008) (Axd)
ML15231A554
Person / Time
Site: Cook  American Electric Power icon.png
Issue date: 08/18/2015
From: Christine Lipa
NRC/RGN-III/DRS/EB2
To: Weber L
Indiana Michigan Power Co
References
IR 2015008
Download: ML15231A554 (8)


See also: IR 05000315/2015008

Text

UNITED STATES

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

REGION III

2443 WARRENVILLE RD. SUITE 210

LISLE, IL 60532-4352

August 18, 2015

Mr. Larry Weber

Senior VP and Chief Nuclear Officer

Indiana Michigan Power Company

Nuclear Generation Group

One Cook Place

Bridgman, MI 49106

SUBJECT: DONALD. C. COOK NUCLEAR POWER PLANT, UNITS 1 AND 2 - REQUEST

FOR INFORMATION FOR AN NRC TRIENNIAL PILOT BASELINE COMPONENT

DESIGN BASES INSPECTION (INSPECTION REPORT 05000315/2015008;

05000316/2015008)

Dear Mr. Weber:

On November 2, 2015, the U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) will begin the team

portion of the triennial pilot baseline Component Design Bases Inspection (CDBI) at Donald C.

Cook Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2. This inspection will be performed in accordance with

NRC Baseline Inspection Procedure 71111.21T. A team of six inspectors will perform this

2-week onsite pilot inspection.

The CDBI focuses on the design, maintenance, and operation of risk-significant components

associated with one or more accident scenario or systems. The components to be reviewed

during this baseline inspection will be identified during the in-office preparation weeks that occur

prior to the first onsite inspection week. In addition, operating experience issues, associated

with the component samples, will also be selected for review. The inspection team may request

scenarios to be performed on the simulator. This request would require support from your

simulator staff to validate scenarios, simulator time, and a crew to perform the actions, which

would most likely occur during the second onsite week. The team will work closely with your

staff early on during the inspection process to ensure this activity can be accomplished with

minimal impact.

This pilot inspection will include two weeks onsite. The inspection team will consist of six NRC

inspectors, of which five will focus on engineering/maintenance and one on operations. The

current inspection schedule is as follows:

  • Preparatory weeks: October 19 -23, 2015; and

October 26 - 30, 2015.

  • On-site inspection weeks: November 2 - 6, 2015; and

November 16 - 20, 2015.

L. Weber -2-

Experience with previous baseline design inspections of similar depth and length has shown

that this type of inspection is extremely resource intensive, both for the NRC inspectors and the

licensee staff. In order to minimize the inspection impact on the site, and to ensure a productive

inspection for both parties, we have enclosed a request for information needed for the

inspection.

It is important that all of these documents are up to date and complete in order to minimize the

number of additional documents requested during the preparation and/or the onsite portions of

the inspection. Insofar as possible, this information should be provided electronically to the lead

inspector. The information request has been divided into three groups:

  • The first group lists information necessary for our initial inspection scoping activities.

This information should be provided to the lead inspector no later than September 14, 2015.

By September 30, 2015, the lead inspector will communicate the initial selected set of

approximately 10 components.

  • The second group of documents requested is those items needed to support our in-office

preparation activities. This set of documents, including the calculations associated with the

initial selected components, should be provided to the lead inspector at the Regional Office

no later than October 14, 2015. During the in-office preparation activities, the team may

identify additional information needed to support the inspection.

  • The last group includes the additional information above as well as plant specific reference

material. This information should be available to the team onsite on November 2, 2015. It is

also requested that corrective action documents and/or questions developed during the

inspection be provided to the lead inspector as the documents are generated.

The lead inspector for this inspection is Mr. Néstor Féliz-Adorno. We understand that our

licensing contact for this inspection is Mr. John Nimtz of your organization. If there are any

questions about the inspection or the material requested in the enclosure, please contact the

lead inspector at (630) 829-9739, or via e-mail at Nestor.Feliz-Adorno@nrc.gov.

This letter does not contain new or amended information collection requirements subject

to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). Existing information

collection requirements were approved by the Office of Management and Budget, Control

Number 3150-0011. The NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required

to respond to, a request for information or an information collection requirement unless the

requesting document displays a currently valid Office of Management and Budget Control

Number.

L. Weber -3-

In accordance with Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) 2.390, Public

Inspections, Exemptions, Requests for Withholding, of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy

of this letter, its enclosure, and your response (if any) will be available electronically for public

inspection in the NRCs Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS)

component of the NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS).

ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html

(the Public Electronic Reading Room).

Sincerely,

/RA/

Christine A. Lipa, Chief

Engineering Branch 2

Division of Reactor Safety

Docket Nos. 50-315; 50-316

License Nos. DPR-58; DPR-74

Enclosure:

Information Request for Component Design Bases Inspection

c w/encl: Distribution via LISTSERV

INFORMATION REQUEST FOR COMPONENT DESIGN BASES INSPECTION

Inspection Report: 05000315/2015008; 05000316/2015008

Inspection Dates: November 2 - 6, 2015; and

November 16 - 20, 2015.

Inspection Procedure: IP 71111.21T, Component Design Bases Inspection (Teams)

Lead Inspector: Néstor Féliz Adorno, Senior Reactor Engineer, DRS

(630) 829-9739

Nestor.Feliz-Adorno@nrc.gov

I. Information Requested Prior to the Onsite Information Gathering/Inspection Week

The following information is requested by September 14, 2015, or sooner, to facilitate

inspection preparation. If you have any questions regarding this information, please

call the team leader as soon as possible. (Please provide the information electronically

in pdf files, Excel, or other searchable formats, preferably on some portable electronic

media (e.g., CDROM, DVD, flash drive, etc.). The portable electronic media should

contain descriptive names, and be indexed and hyperlinked to facilitate ease of use.

Information in lists should contain enough information to be easily understood by

someone who has knowledge of light water reactor technology).

1. Risk-ranking of top 250 components from your site specific Probabilistic Safety

Analysis (PSA) sorted by Risk-Achievement Worth (RAW). Include values for

Birnbaum Importance, Risk-Reduction Worth, and Fussell-Veseley (as applicable).

2. Risk-ranking of top 100 containment-related components (i.e. Large Early Release

Frequency (LERF)) from your site specific PSA sorted by RAW.

3. Provide a list of the top 200 cut-sets from your PSA.

4. Provide a list of the top 100 cut-sets for each initiator modeled in the PSA that

contributes more than 5 percent to the baseline plant core damage frequency.

5. Copies of PSA system notebooks, and latest PSA summary document.

6. List of time critical operator actions. Identify those actions that do not have job

performance measures.

7. Provide copies of the emergency operating procedures.

8. If you have an External Events or Fire PSA Model, provide the information requested

in Items 1 and 2 for external events and fire. Provide narrative description of each

coded event (including fire, flood zone description).

Enclosure

INFORMATION REQUEST FOR COMPONENT DESIGN BASES INSPECTION

9. Electronic copy of the site Individual Plant Examination of External Events,

if available.

10. Any pre-existing evaluation or list of components and associated calculations with

low-design margins, (i.e., pumps closest to the design limit for flow or pressure,

diesel generator close to design required output, heat exchangers close to rated

design heat removal etc.).

11. List of available design (setup) margins in both the open and closed direction

(identify safety-related direction) for valves in the Motor-Operated Valve and

Air-Operated Valve Programs. Identify the basis for how the margin was determined.

12. List of high-risk Maintenance Rule systems/components based on engineering or

expert panel judgment (i.e., those systems/components not identified in the PRA).

13. Structures, systems, and components in the Maintenance Rule (a)(1) category for

the last 3 years.

14. Site top 10 issues list (if applicable).

15. A list of operating experience evaluations for the last 3 years.

16. Information of any common cause failure of components experienced in the last

5 years at your facility.

17. List of Root Cause Evaluations associated with component failures or design issues

initiated/completed in the last five years.

18. List of open operability evaluations.

19. List of components/systems considered operable but degraded/nonconforming.

20. Current management and engineering organizational chart.

21. Electronic copies of Updated Final Safety Analysis Report, Technical Specifications,

Technical Specifications Bases, and Technical Requirements Manual.

22. Major one line electrical drawings (ac and dc), and key diagrams (paper copies).

23. Electronic copy of Piping and Instrumentation Drawings (P&IDs) (if available).

II. Information Requested (for the approximate 10 selected components) to be

Available by October 14, 2015, (will be reviewed by the team in the Regional

office during the weeks of October 19 - 23, 2015, and October 26 - 30, 2015).

This information should be separated for each selected component, especially if

provided electronically (e.g., folder with component name that includes calculations,

condition reports, maintenance history, etc.).

1. List of condition reports (corrective action documents) associated with each of the

selected components for the last 6 years.

2

INFORMATION REQUEST FOR COMPONENT DESIGN BASES INSPECTION

2. The maintenance history (corrective, preventive, and elective) associated with each

of the selected components for the last 10 years. Identify frequency of preventive

maintenance activities.

3. Copies of calculations associated with each of the selected components (if not

previously provided), excluding data files. Please review the calculations and also

provide copies of important referenced material (such as drawings, engineering

requests, and vendor letters). Pipe stress calculations are excluded from this

request.

4. System Health Reports, System Descriptions, Design Basis Documents, and/or

Training Lesson Plans associated with each of the selected components.

5. A list of modifications, including equivalency evaluations and setpoint changes,

associated with each of the selected components. This list should include a

descriptive paragraph on the purpose of the modification. Please ensure this list

only includes design completed (not canceled) modifications.

6. Copies of operability evaluations (open/closed for last 3 years) associated with

each of the selected components and plans for restoring operability, if applicable.

7. Copies of selected operator work-around evaluations associated with each of the

selected components and plans for resolution, if applicable.

8. Copies of any open temporary modifications associated with each of the selected

components, if applicable.

9. Copy of latest completed surveillance tests for each component (e.g., for pumps this

would include: comprehensive test, quarterly test, flow balance, etc.; for valves:

stroke time testing, diagnostic testing, leak testing, etc.). Acceptance criteria basis

calculations should also be included.

10. Provide copies of the normal and abnormal operating procedures associated with the

selected components and selected scenarios.

11. A copy of any internal/external self-assessments and associated corrective action

documents generated in preparation for the inspection.

12. Copy of the last three completed tests and surveillances for each component, for

example:

  • Pumps: comprehensive test, quarterly test, flow balance, etc.
  • Valves: stroke time testing, diagnostic testing, leak testing, interlocks, etc.
  • Heat Exchangers/room coolers: thermal performance, clean/inspect, fan

flows, etc.

Acceptance criteria basis calculations should also be included.

13. A copy of engineering/operations related audits completed in the last 2 years.

3

INFORMATION REQUEST FOR COMPONENT DESIGN BASES INSPECTION

III. Additional Information to be Provided on November 2, 2015, Onsite (for final

selected components)

1. During the in-office preparation activities, the team will be making final selections and

may identify additional information needed to support the inspection. The lead

inspector will provide a list of the additional information needed during the week of

October 19 - 23, 2015.

2. Schedule of any testing/maintenance activities to be conducted on the selected

components during the three onsite inspection weeks.

IV. Information Requested to be Provided Throughout the Inspection

1. Copies of any corrective action documents generated as a result of the teams

questions or queries during this inspection.

2. Copies of the list of questions submitted by the team members and the

status/resolution of the information requested (provide daily during the inspection to

each team member).

3. One complete set of P&IDs (paper copies).

4. Reference materials. (make available if needed during all on-site weeks):

  • Individual Plant Examination/ PRA report;
  • Procurement documents for components selected (verify retrievable);
  • Plant procedures (normal, abnormal, emergency, surveillance, etc.);
  • Original Final Safety Analysis Report; and
  • Vendor manuals.

If you have questions regarding the information requested, please contact the lead inspector.

4

L. Weber -3-

In accordance with Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) 2.390, Public

Inspections, Exemptions, Requests for Withholding, of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy

of this letter, its enclosure, and your response (if any) will be available electronically for public

inspection in the NRCs Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS)

component of the NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS).

ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html

(the Public Electronic Reading Room).

Sincerely,

/RA/

Christine A. Lipa, Chief

Engineering Branch 2

Division of Reactor Safety

Docket Nos. 50-315; 50-316

License Nos. DPR-58; DPR-74

Enclosure:

Information Request for Component Design Bases Inspection

c w/encl: Distribution via LISTSERV

DISTRIBUTION w/encl:

Kimyata MorganButler

RidsNrrDorlLpl3-1 Resource

RidsNrrPMDCCook Resource

RidsNrrDirsIrib Resource

Cynthia Pederson

Darrell Roberts

Richard Skokowski

Allan Barker

Carole Ariano

Linda Linn

DRPIII

DRSIII

Jim Clay

Carmen Olteanu

ADAMS Accession Number ML15231A554

Publicly Available Non-Publicly Available Sensitive Non-Sensitive

To receive a copy of this document, indicate in the concurrence box "C" = Copy without attach/encl "E" = Copy with attach/encl "N" = No copy

OFFICE RIII RIII RIII RIII

NAME ADunlop for NFéliz-Adorno:cl CLipa

DATE 08/18/15 08/18/15

OFFICIAL RECORD COPY