ML19209C525: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:..- - ..---. - - -. - - -....
{{#Wiki_filter:..         - - .             .       ---                       . - - -. - - -....    .
..s..September 12, 1979
.s   ..
.UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD In the Matter of
September 12, 1979 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD In the Matter of                       )
))METROPOLITAN EDISON COMPANY
                                                  )
)Docket No. 50-289
METROPOLITAN EDISON COMPANY             )       Docket No. 50-289 (Three Mile Island Nuclear Station,                   ch                 'N Unit No. 1)                        )
'N (Three Mile Island Nuclear Station, ch Unit No. 1)
C   -
)C 5%g)h 2-<~LICENSEE'S ANSWER TO PETITION FO
5             %g)h 2
<<<" y LEAVE TO INTERVENE BY g\CHESAPEAKE ENERGY ALLIANCE, INC.
                                                                                    <   ~
LICENSEE'S ANSWER TO PETITION FO         <<<               y LEAVE TO INTERVENE BY       g\
CHESAPEAKE ENERGY ALLIANCE, INC.
Metropolitan Edison Company (Licensee) hereby submits its answer to a Petition for Leave to Intervene filed by Chesa-peake Energy Alliance, Inc. (Petitioner) , dated September 3, 1979, and received by Licensee's counsel on September 5, 1979.
Metropolitan Edison Company (Licensee) hereby submits its answer to a Petition for Leave to Intervene filed by Chesa-peake Energy Alliance, Inc. (Petitioner) , dated September 3, 1979, and received by Licensee's counsel on September 5, 1979.
In accordance with the Board's Memorandum and Order dated August 31, 1979, Licensee's answer is confined to the adequacy of the
In accordance with the Board's Memorandum and Order dated August 31, 1979, Licensee's answer is confined to the adequacy of the                       ,
, petition from the standpoint of Petitioner's showing of interest and identification of the, aspect or aspec*s of the proceeding as to which intervention is sought.
petition from the standpoint of Petitioner's showing of interest and identification of the, aspect or aspec*s of the proceeding as to which intervention is sought.
Petitioner's interest in the proceeding is marginal but in Licensee's view adequate to support intervention.
Petitioner's interest in the proceeding is marginal but in Licensee's view adequate to support intervention. Peti-tiener alleges a danger to the life and health of its members in the event of a major accident at TMI.     According to the petition Petitioner's members are concentrated in Baltimore, a distance of approximately 55 miles from Three Mile Island.       This distance 1147 17I 7910100 0 7'[
Peti-tiener alleges a danger to the life and health of its members in the event of a major accident at TMI.
C,
According to the petition Petitioner's members are concentrated in Baltimore, a distance of approximately 55 miles from Three Mile Island.
 
This distance 1147 17I-7910100 0 7'[
  .e .
C,  
falls between the distances at which the Appeal Board has recog-nized or denied claims of a safety interest based on proximity to a nuclear power plant.         Northern States Power Co. (Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant, Units 1 and 2) , ALAB-107, 6 AEC 188, 190 (1973) (petitioners residing 30 to 40 miles from reactor site not necessarily geographically outside the " zone of inter-ests" protected by the Atomic Energy Act); Dairvland Power Coop-erative (Lacross Boiling Water Reactor) , ALAB-497, 8 NRC 312, 313 (1978) (petitioners residing 75 miles from reactor site lack in-terest sufficient to entitle them to intervene) .             However, the petition asserts that some of Petitioner's members, although not named,   live substantially closer to Three Mile Island.             Further, Petitioner asserts a special interest in protection of life forms sustained by Chesapeake Bay and observes that the Susquehanna River, in which Three Mile Island is located, is the major trib-utary of the Bay.
- . - . ..- - -- . - - - .. ....e..falls between the distances at which the Appeal Board has recog-nized or denied claims of a safety interest based on proximity to a nuclear power plant.
Northern States Power Co. (Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant, Units 1 and 2) , ALAB-107, 6 AEC 188, 190 (1973) (petitioners residing 30 to 40 miles from reactor site not necessarily geographically outside the " zone of inter-ests" protected by the Atomic Energy Act); Dairvland Power Coop-erative (Lacross Boiling Water Reactor) , ALAB-497, 8 NRC 312, 313 (1978) (petitioners residing 75 miles from reactor site lack in-terest sufficient to entitle them to intervene) .
However, the petition asserts that some of Petitioner's members, although not
!*named, live substantially closer to Three Mile Island.
Further, Petitioner asserts a special interest in protection of life forms sustained by Chesapeake Bay and observes that the Susquehanna River, in which Three Mile Island is located, is the major trib-utary of the Bay.
Petitioner has not responded directly to the require-ment contained both in the Commission's Order and Notice of Hearing dated August 9,1979, and Section 2.714 (a) (2) of the Commission's Rules of Practice that the petition set forth the specific aspect
Petitioner has not responded directly to the require-ment contained both in the Commission's Order and Notice of Hearing dated August 9,1979, and Section 2.714 (a) (2) of the Commission's Rules of Practice that the petition set forth the specific aspect
.* The petition does not in fact name any individral member on the basis of whose interest intervention is sought.
* The petition does not in fact name any individral member on the basis of whose interest intervention is sought. Counsel for Licensee has, however, been advised by Mr. Robert Q. Pollard, who signed the petition for Chesapeake Energy Alliance, that he is a member of that organization.       Thus the petition discloses that there is at least one named member of Petitioner residing in Baltimore with a claimed interest in the proceeding'who has-implicitly authorized Petitioner to represent his interest in the proceeding.                                                                 ~~
Counsel for Licensee has, however, been advised by Mr. Robert Q. Pollard, who signed the petition for Chesapeake Energy Alliance, that he is a member of that organization.
1147 172
Thus the petition discloses that there is at least one named member of Petitioner residing in Baltimore with a claimed interest in the proceeding'who has-implicitly authorized Petitioner to represent his interest in the proceeding.
. a. '
~~1147 172  
or aspects of the proceeding as to which Petitioner wishes to intervene.         The petition does, however, assert a position on one of the issues specified in the Order and Notice of Hearing, namely the management capability of Licensee.                 Applicant is satisfied to wait for the further definition of the aspects of the proceeding in which Petitioner wishes to participate which will result from the filing of Petitioner's contentions.
. . _ -._-_ - . _ .___. _ ..a. '.or aspects of the proceeding as to which Petitioner wishes to intervene.
Respectfully submitted, SHAW, PI       ,  POTTS & TROWBRIDGE By_      b)
The petition does, however, assert a position on one of the issues specified in the Order and Notice of Hearing, namely the management capability of Licensee.
* AkhW             /
Applicant is satisfied to wait for the further definition of the aspects of the proceeding in which Petitioner wishes to participate which will result from the filing of Petitioner's contentions.
                                                  . ')/Ge %ge T. Trowbridge /
Respectfully submitted, SHAW, PI POTTS & TROWBRIDGE
,'By_b)AkhW/*. ')/Ge %ge T. Trowbridge /
Dated: September 12c.1979
Dated: September 12c.1979
-==mo 1147 173  
                                                                                            ==mo 1147 173 September 12, 1979 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD In the Matter of                           )
-..---- _ ... - . . --._ - - -.---..., , September 12, 1979
                                                    )
.UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD In the Matter of
METROPOLITAN EDISON COMPANY                 )                 Docket No. 50-289
))METROPOLITAN EDISON COMPANY
                                                    )
)Docket No. 50-289
(Three Mile Island Nuclear Station,)
)(Three Mile Island Nuclear Station,)
Unit No. 1)                              )
Unit No. 1)
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that copies of " Licensee's Answer to Petition for Leave to Intervene by Chesapeake Energy Alliance, Inc.," dated September 12, 1979, were served upon the following persons by deposit in the United States mail, postage prepaid, this 12th day of Septem-ber, 1979.
)CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that copies of " Licensee's Answer to Petition for Leave to Intervene by Chesapeake Energy Alliance, Inc.," dated September 12, 1979, were served upon the following persons by deposit in the United States mail, postage prepaid, this 12th day of Septem-ber, 1979.
l
lIvan W.Smith, Esquire
                                                  ~
~Robert Q. Pollard Chairman Chesapeake Energy Alliance Atomic Safety and Licensing 609 Montpelier Street Board Panel Baltimore, Maryland 21218 U.S.Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.
Ivan W. Smith, Esquire                       Robert Q. Pollard Chairman                                     Chesapeake Energy Alliance Atomic Safety and Licensing                   609 Montpelier Street Board Panel                               Baltimore, Maryland 21218 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555                     James A. Tourtellotte, Esquire (4)
20555 James A. Tourtellotte, Esquire (4)
Office of Executive Legal Director Dr. . Walter H. Jordan                       U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Atomic Safety and Licensing                 Washington, D.C. 20555 Board Panel 881 West Outer Drive                         Docketing and Service Section (21)
Office of Executive Legal Director Dr. . Walter H. Jordan U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Atomic Safety and Licensing Washington, D.C.
Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37830                   Office of the Secretary
20555 Board Panel 881 West Outer Drive Docketing and Service Section (21)
                                        ,              U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Dr. Linda W. Little                         Washington, D.C. 20555 Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel 5000 Hermitage Drive Raleigh, North Carolina       27612 Jh!u     -
Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37830 Office of the Secretary U.S.Nuclear Regulatory Commission
                                                                -m gGeo[geF. Tf6wbridge /
, Dr. Linda W.
b Dated: September 12, 1979 1147 174'}}
Little Washington, D.C.
20555 Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel 5000 Hermitage Drive Raleigh, North Carolina 27612 b Jh!u-m-gGeo[geF. Tf6wbridge /
Dated: September 12, 1979
.-1147 174'}}

Latest revision as of 05:14, 2 February 2020

Answer to Chesapeake Energy Alliance 790903 Petition to Intervene.Petitioner Has Shown Interest & Has Identified One Aspect of Proceeding,Re Applicant Mgt Capability,As to Which Intervention Is Sought.Certificate of Svc Encl
ML19209C525
Person / Time
Site: Three Mile Island Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 09/12/1979
From: Trowbridge G
METROPOLITAN EDISON CO., SHAW, PITTMAN, POTTS & TROWBRIDGE
To:
References
NUDOCS 7910160074
Download: ML19209C525 (4)
v • d • e


Text

.. - - . . --- . - - -. - - -.... .

.s ..

September 12, 1979 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD In the Matter of )

)

METROPOLITAN EDISON COMPANY ) Docket No. 50-289 (Three Mile Island Nuclear Station, ch 'N Unit No. 1) )

C -

5 %g)h 2

< ~

LICENSEE'S ANSWER TO PETITION FO <<< y LEAVE TO INTERVENE BY g\

CHESAPEAKE ENERGY ALLIANCE, INC.

Metropolitan Edison Company (Licensee) hereby submits its answer to a Petition for Leave to Intervene filed by Chesa-peake Energy Alliance, Inc. (Petitioner) , dated September 3, 1979, and received by Licensee's counsel on September 5, 1979.

In accordance with the Board's Memorandum and Order dated August 31, 1979, Licensee's answer is confined to the adequacy of the ,

petition from the standpoint of Petitioner's showing of interest and identification of the, aspect or aspec*s of the proceeding as to which intervention is sought.

Petitioner's interest in the proceeding is marginal but in Licensee's view adequate to support intervention. Peti-tiener alleges a danger to the life and health of its members in the event of a major accident at TMI. According to the petition Petitioner's members are concentrated in Baltimore, a distance of approximately 55 miles from Three Mile Island. This distance 1147 17I 7910100 0 7'[

C,

.e .

falls between the distances at which the Appeal Board has recog-nized or denied claims of a safety interest based on proximity to a nuclear power plant. Northern States Power Co. (Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant, Units 1 and 2) , ALAB-107, 6 AEC 188, 190 (1973) (petitioners residing 30 to 40 miles from reactor site not necessarily geographically outside the " zone of inter-ests" protected by the Atomic Energy Act); Dairvland Power Coop-erative (Lacross Boiling Water Reactor) , ALAB-497, 8 NRC 312, 313 (1978) (petitioners residing 75 miles from reactor site lack in-terest sufficient to entitle them to intervene) . However, the petition asserts that some of Petitioner's members, although not named, live substantially closer to Three Mile Island. Further, Petitioner asserts a special interest in protection of life forms sustained by Chesapeake Bay and observes that the Susquehanna River, in which Three Mile Island is located, is the major trib-utary of the Bay.

Petitioner has not responded directly to the require-ment contained both in the Commission's Order and Notice of Hearing dated August 9,1979, and Section 2.714 (a) (2) of the Commission's Rules of Practice that the petition set forth the specific aspect

  • The petition does not in fact name any individral member on the basis of whose interest intervention is sought. Counsel for Licensee has, however, been advised by Mr. Robert Q. Pollard, who signed the petition for Chesapeake Energy Alliance, that he is a member of that organization. Thus the petition discloses that there is at least one named member of Petitioner residing in Baltimore with a claimed interest in the proceeding'who has-implicitly authorized Petitioner to represent his interest in the proceeding. ~~

1147 172

. a. '

or aspects of the proceeding as to which Petitioner wishes to intervene. The petition does, however, assert a position on one of the issues specified in the Order and Notice of Hearing, namely the management capability of Licensee. Applicant is satisfied to wait for the further definition of the aspects of the proceeding in which Petitioner wishes to participate which will result from the filing of Petitioner's contentions.

Respectfully submitted, SHAW, PI , POTTS & TROWBRIDGE By_ b)

  • AkhW /

. ')/Ge %ge T. Trowbridge /

Dated: September 12c.1979

==mo 1147 173 September 12, 1979 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD In the Matter of )

)

METROPOLITAN EDISON COMPANY ) Docket No. 50-289

)

(Three Mile Island Nuclear Station,)

Unit No. 1) )

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that copies of " Licensee's Answer to Petition for Leave to Intervene by Chesapeake Energy Alliance, Inc.," dated September 12, 1979, were served upon the following persons by deposit in the United States mail, postage prepaid, this 12th day of Septem-ber, 1979.

l

~

Ivan W. Smith, Esquire Robert Q. Pollard Chairman Chesapeake Energy Alliance Atomic Safety and Licensing 609 Montpelier Street Board Panel Baltimore, Maryland 21218 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555 James A. Tourtellotte, Esquire (4)

Office of Executive Legal Director Dr. . Walter H. Jordan U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Atomic Safety and Licensing Washington, D.C. 20555 Board Panel 881 West Outer Drive Docketing and Service Section (21)

Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37830 Office of the Secretary

, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Dr. Linda W. Little Washington, D.C. 20555 Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel 5000 Hermitage Drive Raleigh, North Carolina 27612 Jh!u -

-m gGeo[geF. Tf6wbridge /

b Dated: September 12, 1979 1147 174'

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML19209C525&oldid=2391320"