IR 05000285/2013019: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
| issue date = 05/20/2014
| issue date = 05/20/2014
| title = NRC Integrated Inspection Report Number 05000285/2013019 Errata
| title = NRC Integrated Inspection Report Number 05000285/2013019 Errata
| author name = Hay M C
| author name = Hay M
| author affiliation = NRC/RGN-IV/DRP
| author affiliation = NRC/RGN-IV/DRP
| addressee name = Cortopassi L P
| addressee name = Cortopassi L
| addressee affiliation = Omaha Public Power District
| addressee affiliation = Omaha Public Power District
| docket = 05000285
| docket = 05000285
Line 18: Line 18:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:
{{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
[[Issue date::May 20, 2014]]


Louis P. Cortopassi, Site Vice President Omaha Public Power District Fort Calhoun Station FC-2-4 P.O. Box 550 Fort Calhoun, NE 68023-0550 Subject: FORT CALHOUN STATIONNRC INTEGRATED INSPECTION REPORT NUMBER (05000285/2013019) ERRATA
==REGION IV==
1600 E LAMAR BLVD ARLINGTON, TX 76011-4511 May 20, 2014 Louis P. Cortopassi, Site Vice President Omaha Public Power District Fort Calhoun Station FC-2-4 P.O. Box 550 Fort Calhoun, NE 68023-0550 Subject: FORT CALHOUN STATION-NRC INTEGRATED INSPECTION REPORT NUMBER (05000285/2013019) ERRATA


==Dear Mr. Cortopassi:==
==Dear Mr. Cortopassi:==
In accordance with Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) 2.390Inspections, Exemptions, Requests a copy of this letter, its enclosure, and your response (if any) will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of the NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).
It was found that one inspection activity was not correctly documented in NRC Inspection Report 05000285/2013019, dated February 10, 2014. The inspection activity in question was in Section 1R01, Adverse Weather Protection. The item omitted was an inspection of interim mitigation actions for potential flooding hazards. As a result of this correction, please replace page 4 of NRC Inspection Report 05000285/2013019, with the enclosed page.
 
In accordance with Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) 2.390, Public Inspections, Exemptions, Requests for Withholding, a copy of this letter, its enclosure, and your response (if any) will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRCs Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of the NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).


Sincerely,
Sincerely,
/RA/ Michael C. Hay, Chief Project Branch F Division of Reactor Projects Docket No.: 50-285 License No: DPR-40 Enclosure: NRC Inspection Report 00285/2013019 Errata - 4 - Enclosure PLANT STATUS The plant began the inspection period in mode 5, with all fuel in the reactor vessel. On December 18, 2013, the plant reached criticality, and the generator output breakers were closed on December 21, 2013. The plant reached 100% power on December 26, 2013, where it remained for the rest of the reporting period. REPORT DETAILS 1. REACTOR SAFETY Cornerstones: Initiating Events, Mitigating Systems, and Barrier Integrity a. b.
/RA/
Michael C. Hay, Chief Project Branch F Division of Reactor Projects Docket No.: 50-285 License No: DPR-40 Enclosure: NRC Inspection Report 00285/2013019 Errata
 
PLANT STATUS The plant began the inspection period in mode 5, with all fuel in the reactor vessel. On December 18, 2013, the plant reached criticality, and the generator output breakers were closed on December 21, 2013. The plant reached 100% power on December 26, 2013, where it remained for the rest of the reporting period.
 
REPORT DETAILS 1. REACTOR SAFETY Cornerstones: Initiating Events, Mitigating Systems, and Barrier Integrity 1R01 Adverse Weather Protection (71111.01)
.1 Readiness to Cope with External Flooding a. Inspection Scope To address potential flooding hazards higher than the design basis level, the licensee committed to implement a number of interim mitigation actions as detailed in the OPPD letter to the NRC dated October 26, 2013 (ML13322B308). The inspectors reviewed the adequacy of the licensees interim actions. Specific elements of the onsite inspection included: 1) verifying necessary mitigation equipment was available and properly stored, 2) verifying equipment connection locations in the plant, 3) ensuring hose runs were adequate to support their functions, 4) reviewing the engineering analysis associated with the mitigation strategy, and 5) reviewing functional testing results for the mitigation equipment.
 
b. Findings No findings were identified.
 
-4-  Enclosure
}}
}}

Latest revision as of 04:06, 4 November 2019

NRC Integrated Inspection Report Number 05000285/2013019 Errata
ML14140A577
Person / Time
Site: Fort Calhoun Omaha Public Power District icon.png
Issue date: 05/20/2014
From: Hay M
NRC/RGN-IV/DRP
To: Cortopassi L
Omaha Public Power District
Hay M
References
IR-13-019
Download: ML14140A577 (3)


Text

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

REGION IV

1600 E LAMAR BLVD ARLINGTON, TX 76011-4511 May 20, 2014 Louis P. Cortopassi, Site Vice President Omaha Public Power District Fort Calhoun Station FC-2-4 P.O. Box 550 Fort Calhoun, NE 68023-0550 Subject: FORT CALHOUN STATION-NRC INTEGRATED INSPECTION REPORT NUMBER (05000285/2013019) ERRATA

Dear Mr. Cortopassi:

It was found that one inspection activity was not correctly documented in NRC Inspection Report 05000285/2013019, dated February 10, 2014. The inspection activity in question was in Section 1R01, Adverse Weather Protection. The item omitted was an inspection of interim mitigation actions for potential flooding hazards. As a result of this correction, please replace page 4 of NRC Inspection Report 05000285/2013019, with the enclosed page.

In accordance with Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) 2.390, Public Inspections, Exemptions, Requests for Withholding, a copy of this letter, its enclosure, and your response (if any) will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRCs Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of the NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).

Sincerely,

/RA/

Michael C. Hay, Chief Project Branch F Division of Reactor Projects Docket No.: 50-285 License No: DPR-40 Enclosure: NRC Inspection Report 00285/2013019 Errata

PLANT STATUS The plant began the inspection period in mode 5, with all fuel in the reactor vessel. On December 18, 2013, the plant reached criticality, and the generator output breakers were closed on December 21, 2013. The plant reached 100% power on December 26, 2013, where it remained for the rest of the reporting period.

REPORT DETAILS 1. REACTOR SAFETY Cornerstones: Initiating Events, Mitigating Systems, and Barrier Integrity 1R01 Adverse Weather Protection (71111.01)

.1 Readiness to Cope with External Flooding a. Inspection Scope To address potential flooding hazards higher than the design basis level, the licensee committed to implement a number of interim mitigation actions as detailed in the OPPD letter to the NRC dated October 26, 2013 (ML13322B308). The inspectors reviewed the adequacy of the licensees interim actions. Specific elements of the onsite inspection included: 1) verifying necessary mitigation equipment was available and properly stored, 2) verifying equipment connection locations in the plant, 3) ensuring hose runs were adequate to support their functions, 4) reviewing the engineering analysis associated with the mitigation strategy, and 5) reviewing functional testing results for the mitigation equipment.

b. Findings No findings were identified.

-4- Enclosure