ML062650443: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 5: Line 5:
| author name = Heller J
| author name = Heller J
| author affiliation = NRC/RGN-III
| author affiliation = NRC/RGN-III
| addressee name = Pederson C D
| addressee name = Pederson C
| addressee affiliation = NRC/RGN-III/DRS
| addressee affiliation = NRC/RGN-III/DRS
| docket = 05000266, 05000301, 05000305
| docket = 05000266, 05000301, 05000305
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:C SENSITIVE ALLEGATION MATERIAL March 13, 2003 MEMORANDUM TO: C. Pederson, Director, Division of Reactor Safety FROM: J. Heller, Senior Allegation Coordinators  
{{#Wiki_filter:C SENSITIVE ALLEGATION MATERIAL March 13, 2003 MEMORANDUM TO: C. Pederson, Director, Division of Reactor Safety FROM:                   J. Heller, Senior Allegation Coordinators


==SUBJECT:==
==SUBJECT:==
01 INVESTIGATION KEWAUNEE (PO1 BEACH) NUCLEAR POWER PLANT: (01 CASE NO. 3-2002-020) (AMS NO. RIII-2002-A-0114)
01 INVESTIGATION KEWAUNEE (PO1             BEACH) NUCLEAR POWER PLANT: (01 CASE NO. 3-2002-020) (AMS NO. RIII-2002-A-0114)
The subject Office of Investigations' Report of Investigation has been received in Region III and a copy is attached for evaluation by your staff. 01 did not substantiate that discrimination occurred.
The subject Office of Investigations' Report of Investigation has been received in Region III and a copy is attached for evaluation by your staff. 01 did not substantiate that discrimination occurred.
However, the report must be reviewed:
However, the report must be reviewed:
0 to determine if we agree with that conclusion based on the evidence presented, and 0 to identify any unresolved technical issues or other enforceable matters.
0       to determine if we agree with that conclusion based on the evidence presented, and 0       to identify any unresolved technical issues or other enforceable matters.
EICS review of the allegation file indicates that MEB should review this report. The Report of Investigation must be kept in a secure cabinet and access granted on a need-to know basis. At the time all actions on this case are completed by your Division, the report must be returned to the Enforcement and Investigation Coordination Staff for disposition.
EICS review of the allegation file indicates that MEB should review this report.
No portions of the Report of Investigation can be reproduced or released without the specific approval of the Director, Office of Investigations.
The Report of Investigation must be kept in a secure cabinet and access granted on a need-to know basis. At the time all actions on this case are completed by your Division, the report must be returned to the Enforcement and Investigation Coordination Staff for disposition. No portions of the Report of Investigation can be reproduced or released without the specific approval of the Director, Office of Investigations.
Please document the results of your review in a memo to H. B. Clayton, Enforcement Officer, within 15 days of the date of this memorandum, and provide a copy of the results of your review to 01 RIII and to me. This memo should be provided in both hard copy and electronic form (e-mail address for the memo is OAC3), and should clearly indicate whether the Division agrees with the 01 conclusion, or if not, the basis for disagreement.
Please document the results of your review in a memo to H. B. Clayton, Enforcement Officer, within 15 days of the date of this memorandum, and provide a copy of the results of your review to 01 RIII and to me. This memo should be provided in both hard copy and electronic form (e-mail address for the memo is OAC3), and should clearly indicate whether the Division agrees with the 01 conclusion, or if not, the basis for disagreement. Ifyou have questions regarding this matter, please review Regional Procedure 1215 Handling Office of Investigation Reports and Information or contact one of the Office Allegation Coordinators.
If you have questions regarding this matter, please review Regional Procedure 1215 Handling Office of Investigation Reports and Information or contact one of the Office Allegation Coordinators.


==Attachment:==
==Attachment:==
 
as stated cc w/o att: 01 AMS File No. RIII-2002-A-0114 :
as stated cc w/o att: 01 AMS' AMS File No. RIII-2002-A-0114  
AMS'}}
:}}

Latest revision as of 14:52, 23 November 2019

Memorandum to C. Pederson from J. Heller, OI Investigation Kewaunee (Point Beach) Nuclear Power Plant
ML062650443
Person / Time
Site: Kewaunee, Point Beach  NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 03/13/2003
From: James Heller
NRC/RGN-III
To: Pederson C
Division of Reactor Safety III
References
3-2002-020, 3-2002-A-0114, FOIA/PA-2006-0113
Download: ML062650443 (1)


Text

C SENSITIVE ALLEGATION MATERIAL March 13, 2003 MEMORANDUM TO: C. Pederson, Director, Division of Reactor Safety FROM: J. Heller, Senior Allegation Coordinators

SUBJECT:

01 INVESTIGATION KEWAUNEE (PO1 BEACH) NUCLEAR POWER PLANT: (01 CASE NO. 3-2002-020) (AMS NO. RIII-2002-A-0114)

The subject Office of Investigations' Report of Investigation has been received in Region III and a copy is attached for evaluation by your staff. 01 did not substantiate that discrimination occurred.

However, the report must be reviewed:

0 to determine if we agree with that conclusion based on the evidence presented, and 0 to identify any unresolved technical issues or other enforceable matters.

EICS review of the allegation file indicates that MEB should review this report.

The Report of Investigation must be kept in a secure cabinet and access granted on a need-to know basis. At the time all actions on this case are completed by your Division, the report must be returned to the Enforcement and Investigation Coordination Staff for disposition. No portions of the Report of Investigation can be reproduced or released without the specific approval of the Director, Office of Investigations.

Please document the results of your review in a memo to H. B. Clayton, Enforcement Officer, within 15 days of the date of this memorandum, and provide a copy of the results of your review to 01 RIII and to me. This memo should be provided in both hard copy and electronic form (e-mail address for the memo is OAC3), and should clearly indicate whether the Division agrees with the 01 conclusion, or if not, the basis for disagreement. Ifyou have questions regarding this matter, please review Regional Procedure 1215 Handling Office of Investigation Reports and Information or contact one of the Office Allegation Coordinators.

Attachment:

as stated cc w/o att: 01 AMS File No. RIII-2002-A-0114 :

AMS'