ML13232A131: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
| page count = 84 | | page count = 84 | ||
}} | }} | ||
=Text= | |||
{{#Wiki_filter:Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C1 of C413Attachment CForm 9.6: Seismic Walkdown Checklists (SWCs)SWCs Removed:SWELl -083, SWELl -084, SWELl -095, SWELl -096, SWELl -097, SWELl -098,SWELl -099, SWELl-100 Updated final versions of these SWCs, which required follow-up internal electrical cabinet inspections, are included in Attachment J. | |||
Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C2 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet I of 5Status: YZ NF- UI--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 005Equipment ID No. CV305-127 Equip. Class' Pneumatic-Operated Valves (07)Equipment Description RPS Scram Water Outlet ValveLocation: | |||
Bldg. RB Floor El. 23 Room, Area 145 HCUManufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) | |||
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments andfindings. | |||
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. | |||
Anchorage | |||
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)? | |||
Inline component, no anchorage. | |||
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? | |||
Note: Checked anchorage of HCU to concrete. | |||
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation? | |||
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near theanchors?Y-I NEYZ Nn U[I N/A[ZY[ N[-] UF-] N/AZY[ NEil U[I N/AZ-]1 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. | |||
EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C3 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 2 of 5Status: YZ NE] UE]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 005Equipment ID No. CV305-127 Equip. Class Pneumatic-Operated Valves (07)Equipment Description RPS Scram Water Outlet Valve5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? | |||
YE NFE UE N/AE(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for whichan anchorage configuration verification is required.) | |||
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y[E NE] UF]potentially adverse seismic conditions? | |||
Interaction Effects7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? | |||
The air operator on HCU 26-39 is close to the horizontal | |||
: Unistrut, but isnot in contact with it. There is sufficient clearance so that this is notconsidered to be a potential adverse seismic interaction. | |||
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution | |||
: systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? | |||
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YN NEI UE- N/AE-YN NEI UE- N/AE-YE N[-] Url N/A--YN NEI U--EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C4 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 3 of 5Status: YN NEI- Ur]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 005Equipment ID No. CV305-127 Equip. Class Pneumatic-Operated Valves (07)Equipment Description RPS Scram Water Outlet ValveOther Adverse Conditions | |||
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN N[-] UI]adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? | |||
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) | |||
Detailed inspections were performed and photos taken of 2 of the 145 C V305-127 valves: HCU 26-39(West) and on HCU 42-19 (East). The remainder of the CV305-127 valves were inspected for overallconfiguration compliance along with their HCU assembly as part of the area walk-by. | |||
Note that thisincluded a detailed visual inspection of the anchorages of all HCUs.SWELI-O05 is on AWC-014 andAWC-016. | |||
I) }uIEvaluated by: David SmallDate: 10/18/2012 Halie Aroz10/18/2012 EN-DC-1 68 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C5 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 4 of 5Status: Y; NE] UMSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 005Equipment ID No. CV305-127 Equip. Class Pneumatic-Operated Valves (07)Equipment Description RPS Scram Water Outlet ValvePhotographs EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C6 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 5 of 5Status: Y[ NFIj U-ISeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 005Equipment ID No. CV305-127 Equip. Class Pneumatic-Operated Valves (07)Equipment Description RPS Scram Water Outlet ValveNote: Typical CV305-127 valve.Note: Typical HCU anchorage. | |||
EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C7 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet I of 4Status: Y[ NEIl UI-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 006Equipment ID No. SOV305-117-1/4 Equip. Classi Motor-Operated | |||
& Solenoid-Operated Valves (08)Equipment Description RPS Grp 1/4 Scram PilotLocation: | |||
Bldg. RB Floor El. 23 RiManufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) oom, Area 145 HCUInstructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments andfindings. | |||
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. | |||
Anchorage | |||
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)? | |||
Inline component, no anchorage. | |||
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? | |||
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation? | |||
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near theanchors?YE[ NOYEI NEI U[E] N/AZYE] NE] U[I N/A]Y[-] N[]i UEi N/A[1 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. | |||
EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C8 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 2 of 4Status: YZ NI I UI-JSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 006Equipment ID No. SOV305-117-1/4 Equip. Class Motor-Operated | |||
& Solenoid-Operated Valves (08)Equipment Description RPS Grp 1/4 Scram Pilot5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? | |||
Y[] NE] UI- N/AZ(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for whichan anchorage configuration verification is required.) | |||
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ N[L ULIpotentially adverse seismic conditions? | |||
Interaction Effects7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? | |||
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution | |||
: systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? | |||
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YZ N[: uEr N/AL]YN NEJ U[I N/AL]YZ NEI U[-] N/A[]YE N- UL-EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C9 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 3 of 4Status: YZ NEI UL-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 006Equipment ID No. SOV305-117-1/4 Equip. Class Motor-Operated | |||
& Solenoid-Operated Valves (08)Equipment Description RPS Grp 1/4 Scram PilotOther Adverse Conditions | |||
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NEI UFadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? | |||
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) | |||
A detailed inspection was performed and photos taken of one of the 73 SO V305-117-1/4 scram pilots:HCU 26-39 (West). The remainder of the SOV305-117-1/4 scram pilots were inspected for overallconfiguration compliance along with their HCU assembly as part of the area walk-by. | |||
Note that thisincluded a detailed visual inspection of the anchorages of all HCUs. Drawing No. M1N16-7, Rev. Elidentifies HCU 26-39 as part of Set 1.The component did not have a tag on any of the HCUs, and so was identified using the P&ID, DrawingNo. M250 SH1, Rev. 73.SWEL1-006 is on AWC-014.Evaluated by: David Small ý -JH-alie ArozDate: 10/11/2012 10/11/2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C10 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 4 of 4Status: YZ N-- UD-]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 006Equipment ID No. SOV305-117-1/4 Equip. Class Motor-Operated | |||
& Solenoid-Operated Valves (08)Equipment Description RPS Grm 1/4 Scram PilotPhotographs Note:Note: Typical component (SOV305-117-1/4 on bottom).EN-DC-1 68 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage Cll of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet I of 4Status: YZ NE] UL-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 007Equipment ID No. SOV305-117-2/3 Equip. Class, Motor-Operated | |||
& Solenoid-Operated Valves (08)Equipment Description RPS Grp 2/3 Scram PilotLocation: | |||
Bldg. RB Floor El. 23 Room, Area 145 HCUManufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) | |||
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments andfindings. | |||
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. | |||
Anchorage | |||
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y[-] NZof the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)? | |||
Inline component, no anchorage. | |||
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? | |||
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation? | |||
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near theanchors?Y[-] N[-] uE]- N/ANY[I- N[E] UE N/AZYE] NEI U[I N/ANIEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. | |||
EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-O0001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C12 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 2 of 4Status: YZ NE] U[-1Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 007Equipment ID No. S0V305-117-2/3 Equip. Class Motor-Operated | |||
& Solenoid-Operated Valves (08)Equipment Description RPS Grp 2/3 Scram Pilot5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? | |||
YE] NF] Ur] N/AZ(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for whichan anchorage configuration verification is required.) | |||
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YE NEI UI-potentially adverse seismic conditions? | |||
Interaction Effects7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? | |||
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution | |||
: systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? | |||
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?YZ NE] UE-] NIAE]YZ NF-] UE] N/AE]YZ NE]I UE N/AEl10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C13 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 3 of 4Status: Y; NEI U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 007Equipment ID No. S0V305-117-2/3 Equip. Class Motor-Operated | |||
& Solenoid-Operated Valves (08)Equipment Description RPS Grp 2/3 Scram PilotOther Adverse Conditions | |||
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[ NEI U[:adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? | |||
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) | |||
A detailed inspection was performed and photos taken of one of the 72 SOV305-117-2/3 scram pilots:HCU 42-19 (East). The remainder of the SOV305-117-2/3 scram pilots were inspected for overallconfiguration compliance along with their HCU assembly as part of the area walk-by. | |||
Note that thisincluded a detailed visual inspection of the anchorages of all HCUs. Drawing No. MIN16-7, Rev. Elidentifies HCU 42-19 as part of Set 3.The component did not have a tag on any of the HCUs, and so was identified using the P&ID, DrawingNo. M250 SH1, Rev. 73.SWEL 1-007 is on AWC-016.?/4"j ) V,-AEvaluated by: David SmallDate: 10/18/2012 HalteAroz 10/18/2012 | |||
()EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C14 of C413ATrACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 4 of 4Status: YZ NF U--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 007Equipment ID No. SOV305-117-213 Equip. Class Motor-Operated | |||
& Solenoid-Operated Valves (08)Equipment Description RPS Grp 2/3 Scram PilotPhotographs Note:Note: Typical component (SO V305-117-2/3 on bottom).EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-O0001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage 01 5 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet I of 4Status: Y[ N[- U[--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 008Equipment ID No. SOV305-118-1/4 Equip. Class' Motor-Operated | |||
& Solenoid-Operated Valves (08)Equipment Description RPS Grp 1/4 Scram PilotLocation: | |||
Bldg. RB Floor El. 23 RManufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) oom, Area 145 HCUInstructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments andfindings. | |||
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. | |||
Anchorage | |||
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)? | |||
Inline component, no anchorage. | |||
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? | |||
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation? | |||
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near theanchors?YE-I NEYE-- NE] UE[ N/AsYE] NE] UE] N/A[YE] N[-] UE] N/A[Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. | |||
EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C16 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 2 of 4Status: YZ NE] UDlSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 008Equipment ID No. SOV305-118-1/4 Equip. Class Motor-Operated | |||
& Solenoid-Ooerated Valves (08)Equipment Description RPS Grp 1/4 Scram Pilot5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? | |||
YE] N[] UE] N/AZ(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for whichan anchorage configuration verification is required.) | |||
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YE NEI U[-]potentially adverse seismic conditions? | |||
Interaction Effects7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? | |||
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution | |||
: systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? | |||
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YN NEI ur] N/Ar]Y[ N-] ur] N/AF]YN NEI U] N/A[]Y~N N]UM]EN-DC-1 68 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-QOOO1, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C017 of 0413ATTACHMENT 9.6SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 3 of 4Status: YO( NM UM-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 008Equipment ID No. SOV305-118-1/4 Equip. Class Motor-Operated | |||
& Solenoid-Operated Valves (08)Equipment Description RPS Grp 1/4 Scram PilotOther Adverse Conditions | |||
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Yo( NEI UE'adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? | |||
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) | |||
A detailed inspection was performed and photos taken of one of the 73 SOV305-118-1/4 scram pilots:HCU 26-39 (West). The remainder of the SOV305-118-1/4 scram pilots were inspected for overallconfiguration compliance along with their HCU assembly as part of the area walk-by. | |||
Note that thisincluded a detailed visual inspection of the anchorages of all HCUs. Drawing No. M1N16-7, Rev. Elidentifies HCU 26-39 as part of Set 1.The component did not have a tag on any of the HCUs, and so was identified using the P&ID, DrawingNo. M250 SHI, Rev. 73.SWEL 1-008 is on AWC-014.Q0=j L'PEvaluated by: David SmallDate: 10/11/2012 Halie Aroz r/ ll10/11/2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C18 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 4 of 4Status: YZ ND Ur-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 008Equipment ID No. SOV305-118-1/4 Equip. Class Motor-Operated | |||
& Solenoid-Operated Valves (08)Equipment Description RPS Grp 1/4 Scram PilotPhotographs Note:Note: Typical component (SO V305-118-1/4 on top).EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-O0001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage 019 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 1 of 4Status: YZ No U--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 009Equipment ID No. SOV305-118-2/3 Equip. Class, Motor-Operated | |||
& Solenoid-Operated Valves (08)Equipment Description RPS Grp 2/3 Scram PilotLocation: | |||
Bldg. RB Floor El. 23 RManufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) oom, Area 145 HCUInstructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments andfindings. | |||
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. | |||
Anchorage | |||
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)? | |||
Inline component, no anchorage. | |||
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? | |||
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation? | |||
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near theanchors?YI- NOYI-] NE] UE] N/A[Y[-] NEJ UE] N/A[YEr- NEJ UE] N/AsI Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. | |||
EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C20 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 2 of 4Status: YZ NE] UrSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 009Equipment ID No. SOV305-118-2/3 Equip. Class Motor-Operated | |||
& Solenoid-Operated Valves (08)Equipment Description RPS Gro 2/3 Scram Pilot5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? | |||
Y[] NE] UE] N/AZ(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for whichan anchorage configuration verification is required.) | |||
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ NWI U[--potentially adverse seismic conditions? | |||
Interaction Effects7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? | |||
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution | |||
: systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? | |||
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YZ NE-] UE[] N/AE-]YZ NE] uE] N/AE-]YZ NE] UE"] N/AE-]YZ N-] uE]EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-OOOO1, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C21 of 0413ATTACHMENT 9.6Sheet 3 of 4SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMStatus: YN NEI] USeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 009Equipment ID No. SOV305-118-2/3 Equip. Class Motor-Operated | |||
& Solenoid-Operated Valves (08)Equipment Description RPS Grp 2/3 Scram PilotOther Adverse Conditions | |||
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NE] UE[adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? | |||
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) | |||
A detailed inspection was performed and photos taken of one of the 72 SOV305-118-2/3 scram pilots:HCU 42-19 (East). The remainder of the SOV305-118-2/3 scram pilots were inspected for overallconfiguration compliance along with their HCU assembly as part of the area walk-by. | |||
Note that thisincluded a detailed visual inspection of the anchorages of all HCUs. Drawing No. MIN16-7, Rev. Elidentifies HCU 42-19 as part of Set 3.The component did not have a tag on any of the HCUs, and so was identified using the P&ID, DrawingNo. M250 SH1, Rev. 73.SWEL 1-009 is on AWC-016.,i2~jyLuEvaluated by: David SmallDate: 10/18/2012 Halle Aroz10/18/2012 k.../EN-DC-1 68 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C22 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 4 of 4Status: Y[ NIE U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 009Equipment ID No. SOV305-118-2/3 Equip. Class Motor-Operated | |||
& Solenoid-Operated Valves (08)Equipment Description RPS Grp 2/3 Scram PilotPhotographs Note:Note: Typical component (SO V305-118-2/3 on top).EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C23 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 1 of 5Status: YZ NF Ur-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 010Equipment ID No. P203A Equip. Class, Vertical Pumps (06)Equipment Description RHR Pump ALocation: | |||
Bldg. RB Floor El. -17.5 Room, Area SE QDManufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) | |||
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments andfindings. | |||
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. | |||
Anchorage | |||
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)? | |||
This is an anchored component, but due to lead shielding, one of theanchor bolts cannot be visually inspected, therefore, this is not part ofthe 50% anchorage verification. | |||
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? | |||
Three visible anchors are in good condition. | |||
Y[-7 NZYE Nr7 UD7 N/A[l3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation? | |||
Three visible anchors are free of oxidation. | |||
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near theanchors?A surface crack is visible near one anchor, but since all bolts are cast inplace in the foundation, this is not a structural deficiency. | |||
Although oneanchor bolt and nut is not visible, the concrete next to this and all otheranchors is visible and free of cracking. | |||
1 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. | |||
YE NDl U[-] N/A-YN ND UD- N/A[-DEN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C24 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 2 of 5Status: YE NEr] UD]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 010Equipment ID No. P203A Equip. Class Vertical Pumps (06)Equipment Description RHR Pump A5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? | |||
YE] N] Ur- N/AS(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for whichan anchorage configuration verification is required.) | |||
Three anchors match drawing C-100 and SEW's package.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YE NE: UE-potentially adverse seismic conditions? | |||
Interaction Effects7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? | |||
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution | |||
: systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? | |||
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YZ N[-] uEr N/AEFYN NE UE- N/AE1YN NE- UE[ N/AE1YZ NEI U-]EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C25 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 3 of 5Status: YZ N13 UD--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 010Equipment ID No. P203A Equip. Class Vertical Pumps (06)Equipment Description RHR Pump AOther Adverse Conditions | |||
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y; NEi ULiadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? | |||
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) | |||
Area walk-by is on A WC-032.A~. IW~.4A~Evaluated by: Gar SwederDate: 10-9-120Laura Maclay ILIJ'TYCL IO410-9-12VIUJEN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C26 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 4 of 5Status: Y[ NE] Ur-1Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 010Equipment ID No. P203A Equip. Class Vertical Pumps (06)Equipment Description RHR Pump APhotographs Note: Equipment tagNote: Partial view of anchorage EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-OOOO1, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C27 of 0413ATTACHMENT 9.6SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 5 of 5Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 010Equipment ID No. P203A Equip. Class Vertical Pumps (06)Equipment Description RHR Pump AStatus: YE NIE U-INote: Overall viewNote: Surface crack, refer to response inquestion | |||
#4.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C28 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet I of 4Status: YZ Nr-' U'Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 011Equipment ID No. P203C Equip. Class' Vertical Pumps (06)Equipment Description RHR Pump CLocation: | |||
Bldg. RB Floor El. -17.5 Room, Area SE QDManufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) | |||
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments andfindings. | |||
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. | |||
Anchorage | |||
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)? | |||
Pump is an anchored component, but due to lead shielding, only twoanchors are visible, therefore this item is not part of the 50% anchorage verification. | |||
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? | |||
Two visible anchors are in good condition. | |||
YI-- NEYIE Nr- Ur-I N/A-Z3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation? | |||
Two visible anchors are free of corrosion. | |||
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near theanchors?YE NEIl ur- N/Ar-YN NEI U[-- N/ADlAlthough two anchor bolts are not visible, the area near the bolts is freeof cracking. | |||
'Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. | |||
EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C29 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 2 of 4Status: YZ NE] U--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 011Equipment ID No. P203C Equip. Class Vertical Pumps (06)Equipment Description RHR Pump C5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? | |||
YEI NEI UI- N/A[D(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for whichan anchorage configuration verification is required.) | |||
Refer to response to question | |||
#1 above.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y[ NEil UE-potentially adverse seismic conditions? | |||
Two anchors visible and in good condition. | |||
Interaction Effects7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? | |||
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution | |||
: systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? | |||
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YZ NE] UE[ N/A[-YZ NE] UE-- N/A--YN NE] UE[- N/AE--YN N-] Ur]EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C30 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 3 of 4Status: YZ{ NEI UlSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 011Equipment ID No. P203C Equip. Class Vertical Pumps (06)Equipment Description RHR Pump COther Adverse Conditions | |||
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO N[-] UI-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? | |||
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) | |||
Area walk-by is on AWC-032.Evaluated by: Gary Sweder J3i. .. & _Laura Maclay .O. \V \Date: 10-9-1210-9-12EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C31 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 4 of 4Status: YE NF- UD"Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 011Equipment ID No. P203C Equip. Class Vertical Pumps (06)Equipment Description RHR Pump CPhotographs Note: Equipment tagNote: Two anchors not visible due to leadshielding, note pedestal near anchorage isvisible.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C32 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet I of 5Status: YZ ND] U[iSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 012Equipment ID No. P205 Equip. Class, Horizontal Pumps (05)Equipment Description HPCI PumpLocation: | |||
Bldg. RB Floor El. -17.5 Room, Area HPCI RMManufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) | |||
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments andfindings. | |||
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. | |||
Anchorage | |||
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)? | |||
YZ N[-]2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? | |||
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation? | |||
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near theanchors?YZ NEI ULI N/AD-Y[ NDI Ui- N/AD-YZ Nr- Ur- N/AD-Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. | |||
EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C33 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 2 of 5Status: YN NEI U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 012Equipment ID No. -P205 Equip. Class Horizontal Pumps (05)Equipment Description HPCI Pump5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? | |||
YO Ni] Ui- N/A--(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for whichan anchorage configuration verification is required.) | |||
Anchorage configuration verified and dimensions spot checked usingC185, E7 and C186, E3.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YO N[i U[ipotentially adverse seismic conditions? | |||
Interaction Effects7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? | |||
YO NE] U[i N/A[--8. Are overhead equipment, distribution | |||
: systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YE7 NO UEi N/AEland masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? | |||
Open S-hook on southwest side of pump. CR-PNP-2012-04594 waswritten to address the issue and it has been wired to secure it.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?YO NE-] UEi N/AE10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YE-- NO UElof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?See Response | |||
#8.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C34 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 3 of 5Status: YZ NE] UI-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 012Equipment ID No. P205 Equip. Class Horizontal Pumps (05)Equipment Description HPCI PumpOther Adverse Conditions | |||
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y21 NEi U-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? | |||
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) | |||
Area walk-by is AWC-04.P205 is not directly labeled in the field. Label request was entered in eSOMS to have the item labelcreated.The turbine and the pump are on different skids. However the concrete pedestals are quite rigid andare tied together. | |||
Therefore there is no potential for differential movement between pump and driver.This was confirmed by the SEWs package.Evaluated by: Ga Sweder / A I.-.-0Date: 10-15-12Laura Maelav YWYLAý "fnCa DQUA-10-15-124EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C35 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 4 of 5Status: YZ No- U]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 012Equipment ID No. P205 Equip. Class Horizontal Pumps (05)Equipment Description HPCI PumpPhotographs Note: P205 is not directly | |||
: labeled, therefore the equipment is verified by its adjoining components. | |||
Note: View of pump and anchorage EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-OOOO1, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C36 of 0413ATTACHMENT 9.6SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 5 of 5Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 012Equipment ID No. P205 Equip. Class Horizontal Pumps (05)Equipment Description HPCI PumpStatus: YN NEI uL-]Note: Open S-hookNote:EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-OOO01, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C37 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 1 of 4Status: Y[ N[-] U --Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 013Equipment ID No. MO1001-16A Equip. Classi Motor-Operated | |||
& Solenoid-Operated Valves (08)Equipment Description RHR A Loop Ht Exch BypassLocation: | |||
Bldg. RB Floor El. -3 RManufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) oom, Area SE QDInstructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments andfindings. | |||
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. | |||
Anchorage | |||
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)? | |||
Inline component, no anchorage. | |||
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? | |||
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation? | |||
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near theanchors?Y[- NOYF-1 NEi U[-I N/A[YEI NEI UE- N/A[Y-I NEI UEr N/A[Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. | |||
EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-O0001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C38 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 2 of 4Status: YZ NE] UL-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 013Equipment ID No. MOIOOI-16A Equip. Class Motor-Operated | |||
& Solenoid-Operated Valves (08)Equipment Description RHR A Loop Ht Exch Bypass5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? | |||
Y] N[-] U[-] N/A0(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for whichan anchorage configuration verification is required.) | |||
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YO NE! ULipotentially adverse seismic conditions? | |||
Interaction Effects7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? | |||
There is a large scaffold near the component, but it has a tag stating ithas been seismically evaluated. | |||
Therefore, it does not present aseismic interaction concern.8. Are overhead equipment, distribution | |||
: systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? | |||
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YZ NEI uE] N/AE]Y[ NEI UE] N/AE]YE NE] UE] N/AE]YE NE] U-]EN-DC-1 68 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-OOOO1, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C39 of C41 3ATTACHMENT 9.6SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 3 of 4Status: YE NEl U[]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 013Equipment ID No. Mor101-16A Equip. Class Motor-Operated | |||
& Solenoid-Operated Valves (08)Equipment Description RHR A Loop Ht Exch BypassOther Adverse Conditions | |||
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that couldadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? | |||
YO NEI UE1Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) | |||
The body of the valve is insulated and so is not visible. | |||
All other visible components were checkedduring the walkdown. | |||
SWEL 1-013 is on AWC-007.912jI,,J] Date: 10/09/2012 Evaluated by: David SmallHalie Aroz10/09/2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage 040 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 4 of 4Status: Y¥ ND ULISeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 013Equipment ID No. MO1001-16A Equip. Class Motor-Operated | |||
& Solenoid-Operated Valves (08)Equipment Description RHR A Loop Ht Exch BypassPhotographs Note:Note:EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering ReportNo. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C41 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet I of 5Status: Y[ NR- U[--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 014Equipment ID No. A8 Equip. Class' Medium-Voltage, Metal-Clad Switch-gear (03)Equipment Description 4KV Emercq BussLocation: | |||
Bldg. N/A Floor El. 23 Room, Area YARDManufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) | |||
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments andfindings. | |||
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. | |||
Anchorage | |||
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)? | |||
Due to lack of visual verification of rear cabinet anchors, this was notchosen for the 50% verification. | |||
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? | |||
Anchorage at the back of the panel is not visible without breaking theplane of the cabinet, but anchors at the front of the cabinet are in goodcondition. | |||
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation? | |||
Anchor bolt on outside of cabinet securing a clip is corroded and thethreads of the anchor are no longer visible. | |||
CR-PNP-2012-04509 waswritten to correct the issue. The corrosion is only on the surface with noapparent loss of metal thickness. | |||
Therefore there is no loss of strengthand the hold down plates will perform their design function. | |||
The oneanchor bolt is fused to the nut by general but localized corrosion. | |||
Although they are fused there is no flaking of metal or any apparentreduction in bolt or nut diameter. | |||
Therefore there is no loss of strengthand the anchor will perform its design function. | |||
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near theanchors?YI- NOYO NE!I UiE N/AllYE NE! UL- N/AZ!YE NEI UiE N/Ar-' Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. | |||
EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C42 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 2 of 5Status: YZ NF U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 014Equipment ID No. A8 Equip. Class Medium-Voltage, Metal-Clad Switch-gear (03)Equipment Description 4KV Emerq Buss5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? | |||
YE] N[i ULi N/A](Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for whichan anchorage configuration verification is required.) | |||
Refer to question | |||
#1.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y[ NEI UErpotentially adverse seismic conditions? | |||
This component was a previous outlier for IPEEE. The addition ofclips, verified in the field, was completed. | |||
Refer to question | |||
#3above for explanation of bolt corrosion at clip.Interaction Effects7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? | |||
Maintenance tools (flashlight, screwdriver, etc.) are located next to thepanels, but per procedure 1.17.1, this is acceptable placement anddoes not pose a seismic hazard.8. Are overhead equipment, distribution | |||
: systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? | |||
This component is located in a small enclosure specifically designed forthis equipment. | |||
It is in good condition. | |||
Light bulbs within the cabinetsare plastic coated and do not pose a seismic hazard.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?A small plastic hose next to the batteries inside of the panel was noted.Due to restaints of not breaking the plane of the cabinet while it is open,it could not be determined if this is part of the battery assembly. | |||
It doesnot pose a seismic risk.YZ NEI Ur- N/A[:]YN NEI Un N/ADY[ NEJ U-- N/AD--Y[ NE-I U -EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C43 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 3 of 5Status: YE NF UI-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 014Equipment ID No. A8 Equip. Class Medium-Volta-ge, Metal-Clad Switchqear (03)Equipment Description 4KV Emer, BussOther Adverse Conditions | |||
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE NEI- UI-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? | |||
Floor of Diesel Gen Breaker-152-181 is visible corroded. | |||
CR-PNP-2012-04540 was written to correct the issue.Comments | |||
.(Additional pages may be added as necessary) | |||
Area walk-by is A WC-026.Y4~lA oSS a t OOl~C~n .1 * .4k1,a I n ja~--V GtU -t9v *U)Date: 10-11-1210-11-12Gary Sweder}7Jk-U IL -~-0~EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C44 of C413ATrTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 4 of 5Status: YZ NE] UMISeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 014Equipment ID No. A8 Equip. Class Medium-Voltage, Metal-Clad Switchgear (03)Equipment Description 4KV Emerci BussPhotographs EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-OOOO1, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C45 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 5 of 5Status: Y[ NFI U-ISeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 014Equipment ID No. A8Equip. Class Medium-Volta-ue, Metal-Clad Switch-gear (03)Equipment Description 4KV Emerq BussNote: Inside of panel closest to entrance door.Note corroded anchor clip and anchor.Note: Close-up of corroded anchorEN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage 046 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet I of 5Status: YZ NE] ULISeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 015Equipment ID No. MO1001-28A Equip. Class, Motor-Operated | |||
& Solenoid-Operated Valves (08)Equipment Description RHR A Loop LPCI Iniection Location: | |||
Bldg. RB Floor El. 23 RManufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) oom, Area A VLVInstructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments andfindings. | |||
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. | |||
Anchorage | |||
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)? | |||
In-line component, no anchorage | |||
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? | |||
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation? | |||
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near theanchors?YE- NOYE] NE-] Ur N/A]YE- NE: uE- N/AZYE: NE] Ur- N/AN1 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. | |||
EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C47 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 2 of 5Status: Y[ NFI U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 015Equipment ID No. MO100I-28A Equip. Class Motor-Operated | |||
& Solenoid-Operated Valves (08)Equipment Description RHR A Loop LPCI Injection | |||
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? | |||
YLI Nil UM- N/A[(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for whichan anchorage configuration verification is required.) | |||
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y[ NEI] U[I]potentially adverse seismic conditions? | |||
Interaction Effects7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? | |||
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution | |||
: systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? | |||
Masonry walls 63.4, 63.5, and 63.6 (C941Shl, El) are safety related,therefore seismically qualified and acceptable. | |||
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YZ N[-] U- N/AD-YZ N["] UL- N/A[-]Y[ NE] U'- N/AD]Y[ NEI UFEN-DC-1 68 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-OOOO1, Rev. 1Attachment CPage 048 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 3 of 5Status: YE NEI UrISeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 015Equipment ID No. MO1001-28A Equip. Class Motor-Operated | |||
& Solenoid-Operated Valves (08)Equipment Description RHR A Loop LPCI Iniection Other Adverse Conditions | |||
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NEI UE-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? | |||
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) | |||
A broken placard was noted on the valve body. This is a general housekeeping | |||
: concern, not aseismic interaction hazard, and was reported to Operations for suggested fix.Area Walk-By is on A WC-0 11~. ... Y\. ~C Imltarl hI- nr. Qwnwrodar Date: 16- /1 -/Z-.,.V i IU * .4 Vtl I'It. U- US69A %' aC%+/--UAADavid Smalli1 ,EN-DC-1 68 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-OOOO1, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C49 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 4 of 5Status: YN NE] ULISeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 015Equipment ID No. MO1001-28A Equip. Class Motor-Operated | |||
& Solenoid-Operated Valves (08)Equipment Description RHR A Loop LPCI Injection Photographs Note: LabelNote: View of ValveEN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-OOOO1, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C50 of C41 3ATTACHMENT 9.6SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 5 of 5Status: YZ NF Ur-]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 015Equipment ID No. MO1001-28A Equip. Class Motor-Operated | |||
& Solenoid-Operated Valves (08)Equipment Description RHR A Loop LPCI Injection Photographs Note: Broken PlacardNote:EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-O0001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C51 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 1 of 4Status: Y[ NE UESeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 016Equipment ID No. MO1001-29A Equip. Class' Motor-Operated | |||
& Solenoid-Operated Valves (08)Equipment Description RHR A Loop LPCI Injection Location: | |||
Bldg. RB Floor El. 23 RManufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) oom, Area A VL VInstructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments andfindings. | |||
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. | |||
Anchorage | |||
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)? | |||
In-line component, no anchorage | |||
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? | |||
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation? | |||
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near theanchors?Y[-] NEIYE-] NEi uE-] N/ANYE[- NE] U[-] N/A[YE- NEI UEi N/A]1 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix 13: Classes of Equipment. | |||
EN-DC-1 68 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-O0O01, Rev. 1Attachment CPage 052 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 2 of 4Status: Y[ NF U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 016Equipment ID No. MO100I-29A Equip. Class Motor-Operated | |||
& Solenoid-Operated Valves (08)Equipment Description RHR A Loop LPCI Injection | |||
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? | |||
Y[I Ni] UrI N/AM(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for whichan anchorage configuration verification is required.) | |||
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ N[i] Ur-potentially adverse seismic conditions? | |||
See response | |||
#1Interaction Effects7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? | |||
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution | |||
: systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? | |||
Masonry walls 63.4, 63.5, and 63.6 (C941Shl, El) are safety related,therefore seismically qualified and acceptable. | |||
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YZ Nr-1 U[-D N/A[-]YZ NDI Ur N/AD-IY[ NDJ U[] N/AD-YZ ND- U--EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-OOOO1, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C53 of C413AI'rACHMENT 9.6SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 3 of 4Status: YE NEI UI-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 016Equipment ID No. MO1001-29A Equip. Class Motor-Operated | |||
& Solenoid-Operated Valves (08)Equipment Description RHR A Loop LPCI Injection Other Adverse Conditions | |||
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that couldadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? | |||
YZ NEI UEComments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) | |||
MO 1001-29A has both thermal and radiation shielding Area Walk-By is on A WC-0 11Evaluated by: Gary Sweder,~C'i~iU J~N(kJ-Qr{LA | |||
'352~J Li?Date: ZO / 7-1z-(C /17 /112,navid rmnIIEN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C54 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 4 of 4Status: YZ NrI UrL-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 016Equipment ID No. MOIOOI-29A Equip. Class Motor-Operated | |||
& Solenoid-Operated Valves (08)Equipment Description RHR A Loop LPCI Injection Photographs EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-O0001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage 055 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet I of 4Status: YZ NE] UEI]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 017Equipment ID No. MO1001-34A Equip. Class' Motor-Operated | |||
& Solenoid-Operated Valves (08)Equipment Description RHR Loop A Torus ReturnLocation: | |||
Bldg. RB Floor El. 9 RManufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) oom, Area SE QDInstructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments andfindings. | |||
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. | |||
Anchorage | |||
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)? | |||
Inline component, no anchorage. | |||
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? | |||
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation? | |||
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near theanchors?Y[-- NOYE] NE] UE] N/AOYE] NE-] uE] N/AOY[E] N[-] U[] N/A[I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. | |||
EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C56 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 2 of 4Status: Y[ NFR- Ur]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 017Equipment ID No. MO1001-34A Equip. Class Motor-Operated | |||
& Solenoid-Operated Valves (08)Equipment Description RHR Loop A Torus Return5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? | |||
Y[-- NFi UiL N/AZ(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for whichan anchorage configuration verification is required.) | |||
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ NEI U-Ipotentially adverse seismic conditions? | |||
Interaction Effects7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? | |||
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution | |||
: systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? | |||
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YZ NFil UD N/A-]YZ NEI ULI N/A--YZ Nil u[-] N/A[-]YZ NEL ULIEN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C57 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 3 of 4Status: YN Ný UE-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 017Equipment ID No. MO1001-34A Equip. Class Motor-Operated | |||
& Solenoid-Operated Valves (08)Equipment Description RHR Loop A Torus ReturnOther Adverse Conditions | |||
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y0 N[l U[-]adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? | |||
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) | |||
The paint is stripped around the weld between the valve body and the piping. There is mild surfacecorrosion in the area, but this is not considered an adverse seismic condition. | |||
SWEL 1-017 is on AWC-007.2w~t4Evaluated by: David SmallDate: 10/09/2012 Halie Aroz10/09/2012 | |||
-%--," 0L)EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C58 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 4 of 4Status: YE N[-] U[-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 017Equipment ID No. MOIOOI-34A Equip. Class Motor-Operated | |||
& Solenoid-Operated Valves (08)Equipment Description RHR Loop A Torus RetumPhotographs EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-O0001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C59 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet I of 5Status: YN Nr-F UrSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 018Equipment ID No. MOIOOI-36A Equip. Class' Motor-Operated | |||
& Solenoid-Ogerated Valves (08)Equipment Description RHR Loop A Torus ReturnLocation: | |||
Bldg. RB Floor El. -1.5 RcManufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) om, Area SE QDInstructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments andfindings. | |||
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. | |||
Anchorage | |||
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)? | |||
Inline component, no anchorage. | |||
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? | |||
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation? | |||
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near theanchors?Y[-] NOYE] NE- U[-] N/AOYE]- NE] Ur] N/A2Y[E] NEI U[- N/AZI Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. | |||
EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C60 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 2 of 5Status: YZ NE] U--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 018Equipment ID No. MO1001-36A Equip. Class Motor-Operated | |||
& Solenoid-Operated Valves (08)Equipment Description RHR Loon A Torus Return5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? | |||
YIO NI] U[i N/A[(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for whichan anchorage configuration verification is required.) | |||
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YE NEI U[Ipotentially adverse seismic conditions? | |||
Interaction Effects7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? | |||
The 1-1/2" rigid steel power conduit to Core Spray Valve MO 1400-3A isin contact with the motor operator of MO 100 1-36A. The conduitappears slightly bent due to this contact. | |||
Due to the potential foradverse interaction during a seismic event, CR-PNP-2012-04442 waswritten to address the concem. WR 286594 has been initiated toreroute the conduit to provide clearance with the motor. See attachedphoto.8. Are overhead equipment, distribution | |||
: systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? | |||
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YEI NZ Ur- N/A[YZ N[-] U-- N/A--YZ N[-] Ur-] N/AF-]YF- NZ Ur-1EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C61 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 3 of 5Status: YZ Nn Ur-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 018Equipment ID No. MO1001-36A Equip. Class Motor-Operated | |||
& Solenoid-Operated Valves (08)Equipment Description RHR Loop A Torus ReturnOther Adverse Conditions | |||
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YED NEI U-jadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? | |||
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) | |||
The paint is stripped around the welds between the valve body and the piping. There is mild surfacecorrosion in the area, but this is not considered an adverse seismic condition. | |||
Under the valve, two pins were found duct taped to a stanchion above a spring can. This wasdiscussed with operations and engineering management, and was determined to be an acceptable practice for holding the pins in place; therefore, it is not a seismic interaction or a housekeeping concern.SWEL1-018 is on AWC-007.Evaluated by: David Small 0 J/ I 'AHalie ArozDate: 10/09/2012 10/09/2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C62 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 4 of 5Status: Y[ Nr I U--ISeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 018Equipment ID No. MOIOOI-36A Equip. Class Motor-Operated | |||
& Solenoid-Operated Valves (08)Equipment Description RHR Loop A Torus ReturnPhotographs Note:Note:EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C63 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 5 of 5Status: YN NR U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 018Equipment ID No. MOIOOI-36A Equip. Class Motor-Operated | |||
& Solenoid-Operated Valves (08)Equipment Description RHR Loop A Torus ReturnNote: MO1400-3A conduit in contact with themotor.Note:EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage 064 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet I of 4Status: YZ NF- Ur-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 020Equipment ID No. MO1001-7A Equip. Class' Motor-Operated | |||
& Solenoid-Operated Valves (08)Equipment Description RHR Pump P203A SuctionLocation: | |||
Bldg. RB Floor El. -17.5 RcManufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) | |||
,om, Area SE QDInstructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments andfindings. | |||
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. | |||
Anchorage | |||
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)? | |||
Inline component, no anchorage. | |||
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? | |||
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation? | |||
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near theanchors?YE-] NOYE-- NEI ULI N/AOYEl NEl U[E N/AOYF] NE] U[-E N/AZI Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. | |||
EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage 065 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 2 of 4Status: Y[ NE UElSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 020Equipment ID No. MO1001-7A Equip. Class Motor-Operated | |||
& Solenoid-Operated Valves (08)Equipment Description RHR Pump P203A Suction5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? | |||
Y[E NE] UE-] N/A(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for whichan anchorage configuration verification is required.) | |||
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y[K NEI UEFpotentially adverse seismic conditions? | |||
Interaction Effects7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? | |||
Scaffold at base of valve is safety related per scaffold log 12-0 1, ECR13360 and does not pose a seismic hazard.8. Are overhead equipment, distribution | |||
: systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? | |||
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YZ NEi UE- N/AE[YZ NEl UE- NIAEYZ NE-] U[E- N/AE-YZ NE-] uEEN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-OOOO1, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C66 of 0413ATTACHMENT 9.6SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 3 of 4Status: Y[ N["] Ul-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 020Equipment ID No. MO1001-7A Equip. Class Motor-Operated | |||
& Solenoid-Operated Valves (08)Equipment Description RHR Pump P203A SuctionOther Adverse Conditions | |||
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that couldadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? | |||
YZ NEI uLComments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) | |||
Area walk-by is on AWC-032.Evaluated by: Gary SwederDate: 10-9-12-- (,j -Laura Macla v )AWCLOct-6YLCQ 10-9-12EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C67 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 4 of 4Status: YZ NE] UrSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 020Equipment ID No. MO1001-7A Equip. Class Motor-Operated | |||
& Solenoid-Operated Valves (08)Equipment Description RHR Pump P203A SuctionPhotographs EN-DC-1 68 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C68 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet I of 4Status: YZ Nr-] Ur-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 021Equipment ID No. M01001-7C Equip. Classi Motor-Operated | |||
& Solenoid-Operated Valves (08)Equipment Description RHR Pump P203C SuctionLocation: | |||
Bldg. RB Floor El. -17.5 RManufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) oom, Area SE QDInstructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments andfindings. | |||
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. | |||
Anchorage | |||
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)? | |||
Inline component, no anchorage. | |||
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? | |||
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation? | |||
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near theanchors?YE-- N[Y--] NE] UEi N/AZYEI NEI UEr N/A[YE] NEI uEr N/AZI Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment, EN-DC-1 68 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C69 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 2 of 4Status: YM NEI UI-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 021Equipment ID No. M01001-7C Equip. Class Motor-Operated | |||
& Solenoid-Operated Valves (08)Equipment Description RHR Pump P203C Suction5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? | |||
YI] NFI UF- N/AN(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for whichan anchorage configuration verification is required.) | |||
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YE NFI U-]potentially adverse seismic conditions? | |||
Interaction Effects7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? | |||
Scaffold at base of valve is safety related per scaffold log 12-01, ECR13360 and does not pose a seismic hazard.8. Are overhead equipment, distribution | |||
: systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? | |||
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YZ NEI U[-] N/Ar]Y[ NiE UI- N/A[-]YN NEII U[] N/A-]YZ NiE UE[EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-OOOO1, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C70 of 0413A'RACHMENT 9.6SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 3 of 4Status: Y0 NEI U[-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 021Equipment ID No. M01001-7C Equip. Class Motor-Operated | |||
& Solenoid-Operated Valves (08)Equipment Description RHR Pump P203C SuctionOther Adverse Conditions | |||
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that couldadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? | |||
YN NEI ULComments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) | |||
Area walk-by is on AWC-032.Evaluated by: Garv SwederDate: 10-9-12QLaura Maclay WT' V.U01.. U Y Ii C1L(tA10-9-12EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C71 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 4 of 4Status: YZ NE] ULISeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 021Equipment ID No. M01001-7C Equip. Class Motor-Operated | |||
& Solenoid-Operated Valves (08)Equipment Description RHR Pump P203C SuctionPhotographs EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C72 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet I of 4Status: YZ NF- UIZISeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 022Equipment ID No. E207A Equip. Class, Tanks and Heat Exchangers (21)Equipment Description RHR A Loop Heat Exchanger Location: | |||
Bldg. RB Floor El. -17.5 Room, Area SE QDManufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) | |||
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments andfindings. | |||
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. | |||
Anchorage | |||
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)? | |||
Although the component is anchored, due to the location in theoverhead and lack of accessibility to that area, this item is notconsidered for the 50% anchorage verification. | |||
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? | |||
Anchorage is visible from a distance below and to the side of the HeatExchanger. | |||
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation? | |||
Anchorage from the component to the steel frame is in good condition. | |||
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near theanchors?Equipment is anchored to a steel frame which sits on embedded platesin the wall. Due to high location on the wall, this is not visible.'Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. | |||
YO NOYZ NEI UE! N/AEJYZ NE- ULI N/AZ!YEI' NI- U-- N/AZEN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C73 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 2 of 4Status: YZ NM] U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 022Equipment ID No. E207A Equip. Class Tanks and Heat Exchangers (21)Equipment Description RHR A Loop Heat Exchanger | |||
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? | |||
YE] NE] UEI N/AZ(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for whichan anchorage configuration verification is required.) | |||
Refer to response to question 1 above.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YN NE] UI-potentially adverse seismic conditions? | |||
Interaction Effects7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? | |||
Component is covered in lead shielding. | |||
Scaffold at top of HeatExchanger is safety related per scaffold log 12-0 1, ECR 13360 anddoes not pose a seismic hazard.8. Are overhead equipment, distribution | |||
: systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? | |||
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y[ NEI UE] N/A--YZ NE] uE] N/AE]YZ NE] U[-] N/A[E]YN NE] uE-EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C74 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 3 of 4Status: YZ NM UM-ISeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 022Equipment ID No. E207A Equip. Class Tanks and Heat Exchangers (21)Equipment Description RHR A Loop Heat Exchanger Other Adverse Conditions | |||
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YED NE] U[-Eadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? | |||
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) | |||
Area walk-by is on AWC-032.Evaluated by: Gary SwederDate: 10-9-12pLaura Maclay 40LAYYLcC 2A10-9-12EN-DC-1 68 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C75 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 4 of 4Status: YZ N[-] UDSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 022Equipment ID No. E207A Equip. Class Tanks and Heat Exchangers (21)Equipment Description RHR A Loop Heat Exchanger Photographs EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C76 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet I of 4Status: YZ NF UI-]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 024Equipment ID No. M01201-5 Equip. Class, Motor-Operated | |||
& Solenoid-Operated Valves (08)Equipment Description RWCU Suction Line Isolation Location: | |||
Bldg. RB Floor El. 51 RManufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) oom, Area RWCU HXInstructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments andfindings. | |||
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. | |||
Anchorage | |||
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)? | |||
In-line component, no anchorage. | |||
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? | |||
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation? | |||
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near theanchors?YF- NYI-- N[I U["] N/AOYE" NEI UEI N/AZYEI NEl uLE- N/A[IEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. | |||
EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C77 of 0413ATTACHMENT 9.6SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 2 of 4Status: YZ NF U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 024Equipment ID No. M01201-5 Equip. Class Motor-Operated | |||
& Solenoid-Operated Valves (08)Equipment Description RWCU Suction Line Isolation | |||
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? | |||
Yr] NEi Ur] N/AN(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for whichan anchorage configuration verification is required.) | |||
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YN NE] U[-]potentially adverse seismic conditions? | |||
Interaction Effects7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? | |||
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution | |||
: systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? | |||
Long term scaffolding, log 11-99, tag 12169 is erected in the room andis evaluated to show it does not pose an adverse seismic interaction. | |||
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YZ NEI UE] N/AE]YN NEI] uE] N/AE]YZ NE] UE] N/AE]YZ N[-] U-]EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C78 of C413ATrACHMENT 9.6SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 3 of 4Status: YO N-Il UE-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 024Equipment ID No. M01201-5 Equip. Class Motor-Operated | |||
& Solenoid-Operated Valves (08)Equipment Description RWCU Suction Line Isolation Other Adverse Conditions | |||
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that couldadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? | |||
YZ N[:]UE1Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) | |||
Valve body is obstructed by shielding. | |||
The Area Walk-By Checklist is AWC-028.Evaluated by: Gary SwederA A-,Date: I-)- -I1EDavid Smalllof /2.EN-DC-1 68 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C79 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 4 of 4Status: Y[ NIjI Ur--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 024Equipment ID No. M01201-5 Equip. Class Motor-Operated | |||
& Solenoid-Operated Valves (08)Equipment Description RWCU Suction Line Isolation Photographs Note: Valve Identification EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage 080 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6Sheet 1 of 5SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMStatus: YZ NF-] U[Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 025Equipment ID No. M01201-80 Equip. Class, Motor-Operated | |||
& Solenoid-Operated Valves (08)Equipment Description RWCU Return Line Isolation Location: | |||
Bldg. RB Floor El. 51 RcManufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) oom, Area RWCU HXInstructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments andfindings. | |||
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. | |||
Anchorage | |||
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)? | |||
In-line component, no anchorage | |||
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? | |||
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation? | |||
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near theanchors?YE- NZYLI NEI Uil N/A]YEI- NE]l UEr N/AZYEI- NEI urE- N/A;I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. | |||
EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C81 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 2 of 5Status: Y[ NOIl U[ISeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 025Equipment ID No. M01201-80 Equip. Class Motor-Operated | |||
& Solenoid-Operated Valves (08)Equipment Description RWCU Return Line Isolation | |||
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? | |||
YI- NFI ULI N/AN(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for whichan anchorage configuration verification is required.) | |||
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y[ NEi UI-potentially adverse seismic conditions? | |||
Interaction Effects7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? | |||
A ladder at the north end of the room could not be verified to be secure.However, this is not deemed to pose an adverse seismic interaction due to the light weight of an aluminum ladder in comparison to thevalve body.8. Are overhead equipment, distribution | |||
: systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? | |||
Long term scaffolding, logs 11-99, 11-56, and 11-99 are erected andapproved for use in the room and do not present a potentially adverseseismic interaction. | |||
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y[ N[il Ur] N/Ar]Y[E N[-] Ur] N/AE]YO N[] UI-- N/ALEYO NEL UF-EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-OOOO1, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C82 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 3 of 5Status: YN NEIl UI-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 025Equipment ID No. M01201-80 Equip. Class Motor-Operated | |||
& Solenoid-Operated Valves (08)Equipment Description RWCU Return Line Isolation Other Adverse Conditions | |||
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that couldadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? | |||
YU NEIUE1Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) | |||
The Area Walk-By Checklist is A WC-028.Evaluated by: Gary Sweder,A a...L4 L "-,4 "U,Date: /o-/?-(Z'3David Small-ja 6-7 1112-David SmalEN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C83 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 4 of 5Status: YZ N[-] U--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 025Equipment ID No. M01201-80 Equip. Class Motor-Operated | |||
& Solenoid-Operated Valves (08)Equipment Description RWCU Return Line Isolation Photographs Note: Note:EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-OOOO1, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C84 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 5 of 5Status: YZ NE U[DSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 025Equipment ID No. M01201-80 Equip. Class Motor-Operated | |||
& Solenoid-Operated Valves (08)Equipment Description RWCU Return Line Isolation Note: LadderNote:EN-DC-168 REV 0}} | |||
Revision as of 13:19, 4 July 2018
| ML13232A131 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Pilgrim |
| Issue date: | 06/17/2013 |
| From: | Maclay L Entergy Nuclear Operations |
| To: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| 2.13.056 PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev 1 | |
| Download: ML13232A131 (84) | |
Text
Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C1 of C413Attachment CForm 9.6: Seismic Walkdown Checklists (SWCs)SWCs Removed:SWELl -083, SWELl -084, SWELl -095, SWELl -096, SWELl -097, SWELl -098,SWELl -099, SWELl-100 Updated final versions of these SWCs, which required follow-up internal electrical cabinet inspections, are included in Attachment J.
Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C2 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet I of 5Status: YZ NF- UI--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 005Equipment ID No. CV305-127 Equip. Class' Pneumatic-Operated Valves (07)Equipment Description RPS Scram Water Outlet ValveLocation:
Bldg. RB Floor El. 23 Room, Area 145 HCUManufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments andfindings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Inline component, no anchorage.
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?
Note: Checked anchorage of HCU to concrete.
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near theanchors?Y-I NEYZ Nn U[I N/A[ZY[ N[-] UF-] N/AZY[ NEil U[I N/AZ-]1 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C3 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 2 of 5Status: YZ NE] UE]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 005Equipment ID No. CV305-127 Equip. Class Pneumatic-Operated Valves (07)Equipment Description RPS Scram Water Outlet Valve5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?
YE NFE UE N/AE(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for whichan anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y[E NE] UF]potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Interaction Effects7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
The air operator on HCU 26-39 is close to the horizontal
- Unistrut, but isnot in contact with it. There is sufficient clearance so that this is notconsidered to be a potential adverse seismic interaction.
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution
- systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YN NEI UE- N/AE-YN NEI UE- N/AE-YE N[-] Url N/A--YN NEI U--EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C4 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 3 of 5Status: YN NEI- Ur]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 005Equipment ID No. CV305-127 Equip. Class Pneumatic-Operated Valves (07)Equipment Description RPS Scram Water Outlet ValveOther Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN N[-] UI]adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Detailed inspections were performed and photos taken of 2 of the 145 C V305-127 valves: HCU 26-39(West) and on HCU 42-19 (East). The remainder of the CV305-127 valves were inspected for overallconfiguration compliance along with their HCU assembly as part of the area walk-by.
Note that thisincluded a detailed visual inspection of the anchorages of all HCUs.SWELI-O05 is on AWC-014 andAWC-016.
I) }uIEvaluated by: David SmallDate: 10/18/2012 Halie Aroz10/18/2012 EN-DC-1 68 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C5 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 4 of 5Status: Y; NE] UMSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 005Equipment ID No. CV305-127 Equip. Class Pneumatic-Operated Valves (07)Equipment Description RPS Scram Water Outlet ValvePhotographs EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C6 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 5 of 5Status: Y[ NFIj U-ISeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 005Equipment ID No. CV305-127 Equip. Class Pneumatic-Operated Valves (07)Equipment Description RPS Scram Water Outlet ValveNote: Typical CV305-127 valve.Note: Typical HCU anchorage.
EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C7 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet I of 4Status: Y[ NEIl UI-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 006Equipment ID No. SOV305-117-1/4 Equip. Classi Motor-Operated
& Solenoid-Operated Valves (08)Equipment Description RPS Grp 1/4 Scram PilotLocation:
Bldg. RB Floor El. 23 RiManufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) oom, Area 145 HCUInstructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments andfindings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Inline component, no anchorage.
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near theanchors?YE[ NOYEI NEI U[E] N/AZYE] NE] U[I N/A]Y[-] N[]i UEi N/A[1 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C8 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 2 of 4Status: YZ NI I UI-JSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 006Equipment ID No. SOV305-117-1/4 Equip. Class Motor-Operated
& Solenoid-Operated Valves (08)Equipment Description RPS Grp 1/4 Scram Pilot5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?
Y[] NE] UI- N/AZ(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for whichan anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ N[L ULIpotentially adverse seismic conditions?
Interaction Effects7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution
- systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YZ N[: uEr N/AL]YN NEJ U[I N/AL]YZ NEI U[-] N/A[]YE N- UL-EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C9 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 3 of 4Status: YZ NEI UL-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 006Equipment ID No. SOV305-117-1/4 Equip. Class Motor-Operated
& Solenoid-Operated Valves (08)Equipment Description RPS Grp 1/4 Scram PilotOther Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NEI UFadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
A detailed inspection was performed and photos taken of one of the 73 SO V305-117-1/4 scram pilots:HCU 26-39 (West). The remainder of the SOV305-117-1/4 scram pilots were inspected for overallconfiguration compliance along with their HCU assembly as part of the area walk-by.
Note that thisincluded a detailed visual inspection of the anchorages of all HCUs. Drawing No. M1N16-7, Rev. Elidentifies HCU 26-39 as part of Set 1.The component did not have a tag on any of the HCUs, and so was identified using the P&ID, DrawingNo. M250 SH1, Rev. 73.SWEL1-006 is on AWC-014.Evaluated by: David Small ý -JH-alie ArozDate: 10/11/2012 10/11/2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C10 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 4 of 4Status: YZ N-- UD-]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 006Equipment ID No. SOV305-117-1/4 Equip. Class Motor-Operated
& Solenoid-Operated Valves (08)Equipment Description RPS Grm 1/4 Scram PilotPhotographs Note:Note: Typical component (SOV305-117-1/4 on bottom).EN-DC-1 68 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage Cll of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet I of 4Status: YZ NE] UL-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 007Equipment ID No. SOV305-117-2/3 Equip. Class, Motor-Operated
& Solenoid-Operated Valves (08)Equipment Description RPS Grp 2/3 Scram PilotLocation:
Bldg. RB Floor El. 23 Room, Area 145 HCUManufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments andfindings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y[-] NZof the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Inline component, no anchorage.
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near theanchors?Y[-] N[-] uE]- N/ANY[I- N[E] UE N/AZYE] NEI U[I N/ANIEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-O0001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C12 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 2 of 4Status: YZ NE] U[-1Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 007Equipment ID No. S0V305-117-2/3 Equip. Class Motor-Operated
& Solenoid-Operated Valves (08)Equipment Description RPS Grp 2/3 Scram Pilot5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?
YE] NF] Ur] N/AZ(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for whichan anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YE NEI UI-potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Interaction Effects7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution
- systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?YZ NE] UE-] NIAE]YZ NF-] UE] N/AE]YZ NE]I UE N/AEl10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C13 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 3 of 4Status: Y; NEI U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 007Equipment ID No. S0V305-117-2/3 Equip. Class Motor-Operated
& Solenoid-Operated Valves (08)Equipment Description RPS Grp 2/3 Scram PilotOther Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[ NEI U[:adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
A detailed inspection was performed and photos taken of one of the 72 SOV305-117-2/3 scram pilots:HCU 42-19 (East). The remainder of the SOV305-117-2/3 scram pilots were inspected for overallconfiguration compliance along with their HCU assembly as part of the area walk-by.
Note that thisincluded a detailed visual inspection of the anchorages of all HCUs. Drawing No. MIN16-7, Rev. Elidentifies HCU 42-19 as part of Set 3.The component did not have a tag on any of the HCUs, and so was identified using the P&ID, DrawingNo. M250 SH1, Rev. 73.SWEL 1-007 is on AWC-016.?/4"j ) V,-AEvaluated by: David SmallDate: 10/18/2012 HalteAroz 10/18/2012
()EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C14 of C413ATrACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 4 of 4Status: YZ NF U--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 007Equipment ID No. SOV305-117-213 Equip. Class Motor-Operated
& Solenoid-Operated Valves (08)Equipment Description RPS Grp 2/3 Scram PilotPhotographs Note:Note: Typical component (SO V305-117-2/3 on bottom).EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-O0001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage 01 5 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet I of 4Status: Y[ N[- U[--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 008Equipment ID No. SOV305-118-1/4 Equip. Class' Motor-Operated
& Solenoid-Operated Valves (08)Equipment Description RPS Grp 1/4 Scram PilotLocation:
Bldg. RB Floor El. 23 RManufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) oom, Area 145 HCUInstructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments andfindings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Inline component, no anchorage.
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near theanchors?YE-I NEYE-- NE] UE[ N/AsYE] NE] UE] N/A[YE] N[-] UE] N/A[Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C16 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 2 of 4Status: YZ NE] UDlSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 008Equipment ID No. SOV305-118-1/4 Equip. Class Motor-Operated
& Solenoid-Ooerated Valves (08)Equipment Description RPS Grp 1/4 Scram Pilot5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?
YE] N[] UE] N/AZ(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for whichan anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YE NEI U[-]potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Interaction Effects7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution
- systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YN NEI ur] N/Ar]Y[ N-] ur] N/AF]YN NEI U] N/A[]Y~N N]UM]EN-DC-1 68 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-QOOO1, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C017 of 0413ATTACHMENT 9.6SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 3 of 4Status: YO( NM UM-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 008Equipment ID No. SOV305-118-1/4 Equip. Class Motor-Operated
& Solenoid-Operated Valves (08)Equipment Description RPS Grp 1/4 Scram PilotOther Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Yo( NEI UE'adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
A detailed inspection was performed and photos taken of one of the 73 SOV305-118-1/4 scram pilots:HCU 26-39 (West). The remainder of the SOV305-118-1/4 scram pilots were inspected for overallconfiguration compliance along with their HCU assembly as part of the area walk-by.
Note that thisincluded a detailed visual inspection of the anchorages of all HCUs. Drawing No. M1N16-7, Rev. Elidentifies HCU 26-39 as part of Set 1.The component did not have a tag on any of the HCUs, and so was identified using the P&ID, DrawingNo. M250 SHI, Rev. 73.SWEL 1-008 is on AWC-014.Q0=j L'PEvaluated by: David SmallDate: 10/11/2012 Halie Aroz r/ ll10/11/2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C18 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 4 of 4Status: YZ ND Ur-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 008Equipment ID No. SOV305-118-1/4 Equip. Class Motor-Operated
& Solenoid-Operated Valves (08)Equipment Description RPS Grp 1/4 Scram PilotPhotographs Note:Note: Typical component (SO V305-118-1/4 on top).EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-O0001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage 019 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 1 of 4Status: YZ No U--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 009Equipment ID No. SOV305-118-2/3 Equip. Class, Motor-Operated
& Solenoid-Operated Valves (08)Equipment Description RPS Grp 2/3 Scram PilotLocation:
Bldg. RB Floor El. 23 RManufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) oom, Area 145 HCUInstructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments andfindings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Inline component, no anchorage.
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near theanchors?YI- NOYI-] NE] UE] N/A[Y[-] NEJ UE] N/A[YEr- NEJ UE] N/AsI Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C20 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 2 of 4Status: YZ NE] UrSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 009Equipment ID No. SOV305-118-2/3 Equip. Class Motor-Operated
& Solenoid-Operated Valves (08)Equipment Description RPS Gro 2/3 Scram Pilot5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?
Y[] NE] UE] N/AZ(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for whichan anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ NWI U[--potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Interaction Effects7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution
- systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YZ NE-] UE[] N/AE-]YZ NE] uE] N/AE-]YZ NE] UE"] N/AE-]YZ N-] uE]EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-OOOO1, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C21 of 0413ATTACHMENT 9.6Sheet 3 of 4SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMStatus: YN NEI] USeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 009Equipment ID No. SOV305-118-2/3 Equip. Class Motor-Operated
& Solenoid-Operated Valves (08)Equipment Description RPS Grp 2/3 Scram PilotOther Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NE] UE[adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
A detailed inspection was performed and photos taken of one of the 72 SOV305-118-2/3 scram pilots:HCU 42-19 (East). The remainder of the SOV305-118-2/3 scram pilots were inspected for overallconfiguration compliance along with their HCU assembly as part of the area walk-by.
Note that thisincluded a detailed visual inspection of the anchorages of all HCUs. Drawing No. MIN16-7, Rev. Elidentifies HCU 42-19 as part of Set 3.The component did not have a tag on any of the HCUs, and so was identified using the P&ID, DrawingNo. M250 SH1, Rev. 73.SWEL 1-009 is on AWC-016.,i2~jyLuEvaluated by: David SmallDate: 10/18/2012 Halle Aroz10/18/2012 k.../EN-DC-1 68 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C22 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 4 of 4Status: Y[ NIE U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 009Equipment ID No. SOV305-118-2/3 Equip. Class Motor-Operated
& Solenoid-Operated Valves (08)Equipment Description RPS Grp 2/3 Scram PilotPhotographs Note:Note: Typical component (SO V305-118-2/3 on top).EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C23 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 1 of 5Status: YZ NF Ur-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 010Equipment ID No. P203A Equip. Class, Vertical Pumps (06)Equipment Description RHR Pump ALocation:
Bldg. RB Floor El. -17.5 Room, Area SE QDManufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments andfindings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
This is an anchored component, but due to lead shielding, one of theanchor bolts cannot be visually inspected, therefore, this is not part ofthe 50% anchorage verification.
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?
Three visible anchors are in good condition.
Y[-7 NZYE Nr7 UD7 N/A[l3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation?
Three visible anchors are free of oxidation.
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near theanchors?A surface crack is visible near one anchor, but since all bolts are cast inplace in the foundation, this is not a structural deficiency.
Although oneanchor bolt and nut is not visible, the concrete next to this and all otheranchors is visible and free of cracking.
1 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
YE NDl U[-] N/A-YN ND UD- N/A[-DEN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C24 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 2 of 5Status: YE NEr] UD]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 010Equipment ID No. P203A Equip. Class Vertical Pumps (06)Equipment Description RHR Pump A5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?
YE] N] Ur- N/AS(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for whichan anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Three anchors match drawing C-100 and SEW's package.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YE NE: UE-potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Interaction Effects7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution
- systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YZ N[-] uEr N/AEFYN NE UE- N/AE1YN NE- UE[ N/AE1YZ NEI U-]EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C25 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 3 of 5Status: YZ N13 UD--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 010Equipment ID No. P203A Equip. Class Vertical Pumps (06)Equipment Description RHR Pump AOther Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y; NEi ULiadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Area walk-by is on A WC-032.A~. IW~.4A~Evaluated by: Gar SwederDate: 10-9-120Laura Maclay ILIJ'TYCL IO410-9-12VIUJEN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C26 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 4 of 5Status: Y[ NE] Ur-1Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 010Equipment ID No. P203A Equip. Class Vertical Pumps (06)Equipment Description RHR Pump APhotographs Note: Equipment tagNote: Partial view of anchorage EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-OOOO1, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C27 of 0413ATTACHMENT 9.6SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 5 of 5Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 010Equipment ID No. P203A Equip. Class Vertical Pumps (06)Equipment Description RHR Pump AStatus: YE NIE U-INote: Overall viewNote: Surface crack, refer to response inquestion
- 4.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C28 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet I of 4Status: YZ Nr-' U'Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 011Equipment ID No. P203C Equip. Class' Vertical Pumps (06)Equipment Description RHR Pump CLocation:
Bldg. RB Floor El. -17.5 Room, Area SE QDManufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments andfindings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Pump is an anchored component, but due to lead shielding, only twoanchors are visible, therefore this item is not part of the 50% anchorage verification.
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?
Two visible anchors are in good condition.
YI-- NEYIE Nr- Ur-I N/A-Z3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation?
Two visible anchors are free of corrosion.
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near theanchors?YE NEIl ur- N/Ar-YN NEI U[-- N/ADlAlthough two anchor bolts are not visible, the area near the bolts is freeof cracking.
'Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C29 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 2 of 4Status: YZ NE] U--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 011Equipment ID No. P203C Equip. Class Vertical Pumps (06)Equipment Description RHR Pump C5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?
YEI NEI UI- N/A[D(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for whichan anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Refer to response to question
- 1 above.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y[ NEil UE-potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Two anchors visible and in good condition.
Interaction Effects7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution
- systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YZ NE] UE[ N/A[-YZ NE] UE-- N/A--YN NE] UE[- N/AE--YN N-] Ur]EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C30 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 3 of 4Status: YZ{ NEI UlSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 011Equipment ID No. P203C Equip. Class Vertical Pumps (06)Equipment Description RHR Pump COther Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO N[-] UI-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Area walk-by is on AWC-032.Evaluated by: Gary Sweder J3i. .. & _Laura Maclay .O. \V \Date: 10-9-1210-9-12EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C31 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 4 of 4Status: YE NF- UD"Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 011Equipment ID No. P203C Equip. Class Vertical Pumps (06)Equipment Description RHR Pump CPhotographs Note: Equipment tagNote: Two anchors not visible due to leadshielding, note pedestal near anchorage isvisible.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C32 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet I of 5Status: YZ ND] U[iSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 012Equipment ID No. P205 Equip. Class, Horizontal Pumps (05)Equipment Description HPCI PumpLocation:
Bldg. RB Floor El. -17.5 Room, Area HPCI RMManufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments andfindings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
YZ N[-]2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near theanchors?YZ NEI ULI N/AD-Y[ NDI Ui- N/AD-YZ Nr- Ur- N/AD-Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C33 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 2 of 5Status: YN NEI U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 012Equipment ID No. -P205 Equip. Class Horizontal Pumps (05)Equipment Description HPCI Pump5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?
YO Ni] Ui- N/A--(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for whichan anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Anchorage configuration verified and dimensions spot checked usingC185, E7 and C186, E3.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YO N[i U[ipotentially adverse seismic conditions?
Interaction Effects7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
YO NE] U[i N/A[--8. Are overhead equipment, distribution
- systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YE7 NO UEi N/AEland masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Open S-hook on southwest side of pump. CR-PNP-2012-04594 waswritten to address the issue and it has been wired to secure it.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?YO NE-] UEi N/AE10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YE-- NO UElof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?See Response
- 8.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C34 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 3 of 5Status: YZ NE] UI-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 012Equipment ID No. P205 Equip. Class Horizontal Pumps (05)Equipment Description HPCI PumpOther Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y21 NEi U-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Area walk-by is AWC-04.P205 is not directly labeled in the field. Label request was entered in eSOMS to have the item labelcreated.The turbine and the pump are on different skids. However the concrete pedestals are quite rigid andare tied together.
Therefore there is no potential for differential movement between pump and driver.This was confirmed by the SEWs package.Evaluated by: Ga Sweder / A I.-.-0Date: 10-15-12Laura Maelav YWYLAý "fnCa DQUA-10-15-124EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C35 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 4 of 5Status: YZ No- U]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 012Equipment ID No. P205 Equip. Class Horizontal Pumps (05)Equipment Description HPCI PumpPhotographs Note: P205 is not directly
- labeled, therefore the equipment is verified by its adjoining components.
Note: View of pump and anchorage EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-OOOO1, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C36 of 0413ATTACHMENT 9.6SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 5 of 5Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 012Equipment ID No. P205 Equip. Class Horizontal Pumps (05)Equipment Description HPCI PumpStatus: YN NEI uL-]Note: Open S-hookNote:EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-OOO01, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C37 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 1 of 4Status: Y[ N[-] U --Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 013Equipment ID No. MO1001-16A Equip. Classi Motor-Operated
& Solenoid-Operated Valves (08)Equipment Description RHR A Loop Ht Exch BypassLocation:
Bldg. RB Floor El. -3 RManufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) oom, Area SE QDInstructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments andfindings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Inline component, no anchorage.
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near theanchors?Y[- NOYF-1 NEi U[-I N/A[YEI NEI UE- N/A[Y-I NEI UEr N/A[Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-O0001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C38 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 2 of 4Status: YZ NE] UL-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 013Equipment ID No. MOIOOI-16A Equip. Class Motor-Operated
& Solenoid-Operated Valves (08)Equipment Description RHR A Loop Ht Exch Bypass5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?
Y] N[-] U[-] N/A0(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for whichan anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YO NE! ULipotentially adverse seismic conditions?
Interaction Effects7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
There is a large scaffold near the component, but it has a tag stating ithas been seismically evaluated.
Therefore, it does not present aseismic interaction concern.8. Are overhead equipment, distribution
- systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YZ NEI uE] N/AE]Y[ NEI UE] N/AE]YE NE] UE] N/AE]YE NE] U-]EN-DC-1 68 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-OOOO1, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C39 of C41 3ATTACHMENT 9.6SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 3 of 4Status: YE NEl U[]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 013Equipment ID No. Mor101-16A Equip. Class Motor-Operated
& Solenoid-Operated Valves (08)Equipment Description RHR A Loop Ht Exch BypassOther Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that couldadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
YO NEI UE1Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
The body of the valve is insulated and so is not visible.
All other visible components were checkedduring the walkdown.
SWEL 1-013 is on AWC-007.912jI,,J] Date: 10/09/2012 Evaluated by: David SmallHalie Aroz10/09/2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage 040 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 4 of 4Status: Y¥ ND ULISeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 013Equipment ID No. MO1001-16A Equip. Class Motor-Operated
& Solenoid-Operated Valves (08)Equipment Description RHR A Loop Ht Exch BypassPhotographs Note:Note:EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering ReportNo. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C41 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet I of 5Status: Y[ NR- U[--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 014Equipment ID No. A8 Equip. Class' Medium-Voltage, Metal-Clad Switch-gear (03)Equipment Description 4KV Emercq BussLocation:
Bldg. N/A Floor El. 23 Room, Area YARDManufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments andfindings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Due to lack of visual verification of rear cabinet anchors, this was notchosen for the 50% verification.
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?
Anchorage at the back of the panel is not visible without breaking theplane of the cabinet, but anchors at the front of the cabinet are in goodcondition.
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation?
Anchor bolt on outside of cabinet securing a clip is corroded and thethreads of the anchor are no longer visible.
CR-PNP-2012-04509 waswritten to correct the issue. The corrosion is only on the surface with noapparent loss of metal thickness.
Therefore there is no loss of strengthand the hold down plates will perform their design function.
The oneanchor bolt is fused to the nut by general but localized corrosion.
Although they are fused there is no flaking of metal or any apparentreduction in bolt or nut diameter.
Therefore there is no loss of strengthand the anchor will perform its design function.
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near theanchors?YI- NOYO NE!I UiE N/AllYE NE! UL- N/AZ!YE NEI UiE N/Ar-' Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C42 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 2 of 5Status: YZ NF U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 014Equipment ID No. A8 Equip. Class Medium-Voltage, Metal-Clad Switch-gear (03)Equipment Description 4KV Emerq Buss5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?
YE] N[i ULi N/A](Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for whichan anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Refer to question
- 1.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y[ NEI UErpotentially adverse seismic conditions?
This component was a previous outlier for IPEEE. The addition ofclips, verified in the field, was completed.
Refer to question
- 3above for explanation of bolt corrosion at clip.Interaction Effects7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
Maintenance tools (flashlight, screwdriver, etc.) are located next to thepanels, but per procedure 1.17.1, this is acceptable placement anddoes not pose a seismic hazard.8. Are overhead equipment, distribution
- systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
This component is located in a small enclosure specifically designed forthis equipment.
It is in good condition.
Light bulbs within the cabinetsare plastic coated and do not pose a seismic hazard.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?A small plastic hose next to the batteries inside of the panel was noted.Due to restaints of not breaking the plane of the cabinet while it is open,it could not be determined if this is part of the battery assembly.
It doesnot pose a seismic risk.YZ NEI Ur- N/A[:]YN NEI Un N/ADY[ NEJ U-- N/AD--Y[ NE-I U -EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C43 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 3 of 5Status: YE NF UI-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 014Equipment ID No. A8 Equip. Class Medium-Volta-ge, Metal-Clad Switchqear (03)Equipment Description 4KV Emer, BussOther Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE NEI- UI-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Floor of Diesel Gen Breaker-152-181 is visible corroded.
CR-PNP-2012-04540 was written to correct the issue.Comments
.(Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Area walk-by is A WC-026.Y4~lA oSS a t OOl~C~n .1 * .4k1,a I n ja~--V GtU -t9v *U)Date: 10-11-1210-11-12Gary Sweder}7Jk-U IL -~-0~EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C44 of C413ATrTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 4 of 5Status: YZ NE] UMISeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 014Equipment ID No. A8 Equip. Class Medium-Voltage, Metal-Clad Switchgear (03)Equipment Description 4KV Emerci BussPhotographs EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-OOOO1, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C45 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 5 of 5Status: Y[ NFI U-ISeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 014Equipment ID No. A8Equip. Class Medium-Volta-ue, Metal-Clad Switch-gear (03)Equipment Description 4KV Emerq BussNote: Inside of panel closest to entrance door.Note corroded anchor clip and anchor.Note: Close-up of corroded anchorEN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage 046 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet I of 5Status: YZ NE] ULISeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 015Equipment ID No. MO1001-28A Equip. Class, Motor-Operated
& Solenoid-Operated Valves (08)Equipment Description RHR A Loop LPCI Iniection Location:
Bldg. RB Floor El. 23 RManufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) oom, Area A VLVInstructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments andfindings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
In-line component, no anchorage
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near theanchors?YE- NOYE] NE-] Ur N/A]YE- NE: uE- N/AZYE: NE] Ur- N/AN1 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C47 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 2 of 5Status: Y[ NFI U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 015Equipment ID No. MO100I-28A Equip. Class Motor-Operated
& Solenoid-Operated Valves (08)Equipment Description RHR A Loop LPCI Injection
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?
YLI Nil UM- N/A[(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for whichan anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y[ NEI] U[I]potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Interaction Effects7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution
- systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Masonry walls 63.4, 63.5, and 63.6 (C941Shl, El) are safety related,therefore seismically qualified and acceptable.
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YZ N[-] U- N/AD-YZ N["] UL- N/A[-]Y[ NE] U'- N/AD]Y[ NEI UFEN-DC-1 68 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-OOOO1, Rev. 1Attachment CPage 048 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 3 of 5Status: YE NEI UrISeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 015Equipment ID No. MO1001-28A Equip. Class Motor-Operated
& Solenoid-Operated Valves (08)Equipment Description RHR A Loop LPCI Iniection Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NEI UE-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
A broken placard was noted on the valve body. This is a general housekeeping
- concern, not aseismic interaction hazard, and was reported to Operations for suggested fix.Area Walk-By is on A WC-0 11~. ... Y\. ~C Imltarl hI- nr. Qwnwrodar Date: 16- /1 -/Z-.,.V i IU * .4 Vtl I'It. U- US69A %' aC%+/--UAADavid Smalli1 ,EN-DC-1 68 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-OOOO1, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C49 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 4 of 5Status: YN NE] ULISeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 015Equipment ID No. MO1001-28A Equip. Class Motor-Operated
& Solenoid-Operated Valves (08)Equipment Description RHR A Loop LPCI Injection Photographs Note: LabelNote: View of ValveEN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-OOOO1, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C50 of C41 3ATTACHMENT 9.6SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 5 of 5Status: YZ NF Ur-]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 015Equipment ID No. MO1001-28A Equip. Class Motor-Operated
& Solenoid-Operated Valves (08)Equipment Description RHR A Loop LPCI Injection Photographs Note: Broken PlacardNote:EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-O0001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C51 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 1 of 4Status: Y[ NE UESeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 016Equipment ID No. MO1001-29A Equip. Class' Motor-Operated
& Solenoid-Operated Valves (08)Equipment Description RHR A Loop LPCI Injection Location:
Bldg. RB Floor El. 23 RManufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) oom, Area A VL VInstructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments andfindings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
In-line component, no anchorage
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near theanchors?Y[-] NEIYE-] NEi uE-] N/ANYE[- NE] U[-] N/A[YE- NEI UEi N/A]1 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix 13: Classes of Equipment.
EN-DC-1 68 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-O0O01, Rev. 1Attachment CPage 052 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 2 of 4Status: Y[ NF U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 016Equipment ID No. MO100I-29A Equip. Class Motor-Operated
& Solenoid-Operated Valves (08)Equipment Description RHR A Loop LPCI Injection
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?
Y[I Ni] UrI N/AM(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for whichan anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ N[i] Ur-potentially adverse seismic conditions?
See response
- 1Interaction Effects7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution
- systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Masonry walls 63.4, 63.5, and 63.6 (C941Shl, El) are safety related,therefore seismically qualified and acceptable.
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YZ Nr-1 U[-D N/A[-]YZ NDI Ur N/AD-IY[ NDJ U[] N/AD-YZ ND- U--EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-OOOO1, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C53 of C413AI'rACHMENT 9.6SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 3 of 4Status: YE NEI UI-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 016Equipment ID No. MO1001-29A Equip. Class Motor-Operated
& Solenoid-Operated Valves (08)Equipment Description RHR A Loop LPCI Injection Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that couldadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
YZ NEI UEComments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
MO 1001-29A has both thermal and radiation shielding Area Walk-By is on A WC-0 11Evaluated by: Gary Sweder,~C'i~iU J~N(kJ-Qr{LA
'352~J Li?Date: ZO / 7-1z-(C /17 /112,navid rmnIIEN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C54 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 4 of 4Status: YZ NrI UrL-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 016Equipment ID No. MOIOOI-29A Equip. Class Motor-Operated
& Solenoid-Operated Valves (08)Equipment Description RHR A Loop LPCI Injection Photographs EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-O0001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage 055 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet I of 4Status: YZ NE] UEI]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 017Equipment ID No. MO1001-34A Equip. Class' Motor-Operated
& Solenoid-Operated Valves (08)Equipment Description RHR Loop A Torus ReturnLocation:
Bldg. RB Floor El. 9 RManufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) oom, Area SE QDInstructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments andfindings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Inline component, no anchorage.
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near theanchors?Y[-- NOYE] NE] UE] N/AOYE] NE-] uE] N/AOY[E] N[-] U[] N/A[I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C56 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 2 of 4Status: Y[ NFR- Ur]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 017Equipment ID No. MO1001-34A Equip. Class Motor-Operated
& Solenoid-Operated Valves (08)Equipment Description RHR Loop A Torus Return5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?
Y[-- NFi UiL N/AZ(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for whichan anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ NEI U-Ipotentially adverse seismic conditions?
Interaction Effects7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution
- systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YZ NFil UD N/A-]YZ NEI ULI N/A--YZ Nil u[-] N/A[-]YZ NEL ULIEN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C57 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 3 of 4Status: YN Ný UE-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 017Equipment ID No. MO1001-34A Equip. Class Motor-Operated
& Solenoid-Operated Valves (08)Equipment Description RHR Loop A Torus ReturnOther Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y0 N[l U[-]adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
The paint is stripped around the weld between the valve body and the piping. There is mild surfacecorrosion in the area, but this is not considered an adverse seismic condition.
SWEL 1-017 is on AWC-007.2w~t4Evaluated by: David SmallDate: 10/09/2012 Halie Aroz10/09/2012
-%--," 0L)EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C58 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 4 of 4Status: YE N[-] U[-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 017Equipment ID No. MOIOOI-34A Equip. Class Motor-Operated
& Solenoid-Operated Valves (08)Equipment Description RHR Loop A Torus RetumPhotographs EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-O0001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C59 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet I of 5Status: YN Nr-F UrSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 018Equipment ID No. MOIOOI-36A Equip. Class' Motor-Operated
& Solenoid-Ogerated Valves (08)Equipment Description RHR Loop A Torus ReturnLocation:
Bldg. RB Floor El. -1.5 RcManufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) om, Area SE QDInstructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments andfindings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Inline component, no anchorage.
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near theanchors?Y[-] NOYE] NE- U[-] N/AOYE]- NE] Ur] N/A2Y[E] NEI U[- N/AZI Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C60 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 2 of 5Status: YZ NE] U--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 018Equipment ID No. MO1001-36A Equip. Class Motor-Operated
& Solenoid-Operated Valves (08)Equipment Description RHR Loon A Torus Return5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?
YIO NI] U[i N/A[(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for whichan anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YE NEI U[Ipotentially adverse seismic conditions?
Interaction Effects7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
The 1-1/2" rigid steel power conduit to Core Spray Valve MO 1400-3A isin contact with the motor operator of MO 100 1-36A. The conduitappears slightly bent due to this contact.
Due to the potential foradverse interaction during a seismic event, CR-PNP-2012-04442 waswritten to address the concem. WR 286594 has been initiated toreroute the conduit to provide clearance with the motor. See attachedphoto.8. Are overhead equipment, distribution
- systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YEI NZ Ur- N/A[YZ N[-] U-- N/A--YZ N[-] Ur-] N/AF-]YF- NZ Ur-1EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C61 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 3 of 5Status: YZ Nn Ur-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 018Equipment ID No. MO1001-36A Equip. Class Motor-Operated
& Solenoid-Operated Valves (08)Equipment Description RHR Loop A Torus ReturnOther Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YED NEI U-jadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
The paint is stripped around the welds between the valve body and the piping. There is mild surfacecorrosion in the area, but this is not considered an adverse seismic condition.
Under the valve, two pins were found duct taped to a stanchion above a spring can. This wasdiscussed with operations and engineering management, and was determined to be an acceptable practice for holding the pins in place; therefore, it is not a seismic interaction or a housekeeping concern.SWEL1-018 is on AWC-007.Evaluated by: David Small 0 J/ I 'AHalie ArozDate: 10/09/2012 10/09/2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C62 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 4 of 5Status: Y[ Nr I U--ISeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 018Equipment ID No. MOIOOI-36A Equip. Class Motor-Operated
& Solenoid-Operated Valves (08)Equipment Description RHR Loop A Torus ReturnPhotographs Note:Note:EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C63 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 5 of 5Status: YN NR U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 018Equipment ID No. MOIOOI-36A Equip. Class Motor-Operated
& Solenoid-Operated Valves (08)Equipment Description RHR Loop A Torus ReturnNote: MO1400-3A conduit in contact with themotor.Note:EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage 064 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet I of 4Status: YZ NF- Ur-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 020Equipment ID No. MO1001-7A Equip. Class' Motor-Operated
& Solenoid-Operated Valves (08)Equipment Description RHR Pump P203A SuctionLocation:
Bldg. RB Floor El. -17.5 RcManufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
,om, Area SE QDInstructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments andfindings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Inline component, no anchorage.
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near theanchors?YE-] NOYE-- NEI ULI N/AOYEl NEl U[E N/AOYF] NE] U[-E N/AZI Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage 065 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 2 of 4Status: Y[ NE UElSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 020Equipment ID No. MO1001-7A Equip. Class Motor-Operated
& Solenoid-Operated Valves (08)Equipment Description RHR Pump P203A Suction5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?
Y[E NE] UE-] N/A(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for whichan anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y[K NEI UEFpotentially adverse seismic conditions?
Interaction Effects7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
Scaffold at base of valve is safety related per scaffold log 12-0 1, ECR13360 and does not pose a seismic hazard.8. Are overhead equipment, distribution
- systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YZ NEi UE- N/AE[YZ NEl UE- NIAEYZ NE-] U[E- N/AE-YZ NE-] uEEN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-OOOO1, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C66 of 0413ATTACHMENT 9.6SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 3 of 4Status: Y[ N["] Ul-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 020Equipment ID No. MO1001-7A Equip. Class Motor-Operated
& Solenoid-Operated Valves (08)Equipment Description RHR Pump P203A SuctionOther Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that couldadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
YZ NEI uLComments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Area walk-by is on AWC-032.Evaluated by: Gary SwederDate: 10-9-12-- (,j -Laura Macla v )AWCLOct-6YLCQ 10-9-12EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C67 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 4 of 4Status: YZ NE] UrSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 020Equipment ID No. MO1001-7A Equip. Class Motor-Operated
& Solenoid-Operated Valves (08)Equipment Description RHR Pump P203A SuctionPhotographs EN-DC-1 68 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C68 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet I of 4Status: YZ Nr-] Ur-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 021Equipment ID No. M01001-7C Equip. Classi Motor-Operated
& Solenoid-Operated Valves (08)Equipment Description RHR Pump P203C SuctionLocation:
Bldg. RB Floor El. -17.5 RManufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) oom, Area SE QDInstructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments andfindings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Inline component, no anchorage.
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near theanchors?YE-- N[Y--] NE] UEi N/AZYEI NEI UEr N/A[YE] NEI uEr N/AZI Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment, EN-DC-1 68 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C69 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 2 of 4Status: YM NEI UI-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 021Equipment ID No. M01001-7C Equip. Class Motor-Operated
& Solenoid-Operated Valves (08)Equipment Description RHR Pump P203C Suction5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?
YI] NFI UF- N/AN(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for whichan anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YE NFI U-]potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Interaction Effects7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
Scaffold at base of valve is safety related per scaffold log 12-01, ECR13360 and does not pose a seismic hazard.8. Are overhead equipment, distribution
- systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YZ NEI U[-] N/Ar]Y[ NiE UI- N/A[-]YN NEII U[] N/A-]YZ NiE UE[EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-OOOO1, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C70 of 0413A'RACHMENT 9.6SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 3 of 4Status: Y0 NEI U[-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 021Equipment ID No. M01001-7C Equip. Class Motor-Operated
& Solenoid-Operated Valves (08)Equipment Description RHR Pump P203C SuctionOther Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that couldadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
YN NEI ULComments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Area walk-by is on AWC-032.Evaluated by: Garv SwederDate: 10-9-12QLaura Maclay WT' V.U01.. U Y Ii C1L(tA10-9-12EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C71 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 4 of 4Status: YZ NE] ULISeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 021Equipment ID No. M01001-7C Equip. Class Motor-Operated
& Solenoid-Operated Valves (08)Equipment Description RHR Pump P203C SuctionPhotographs EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C72 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet I of 4Status: YZ NF- UIZISeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 022Equipment ID No. E207A Equip. Class, Tanks and Heat Exchangers (21)Equipment Description RHR A Loop Heat Exchanger Location:
Bldg. RB Floor El. -17.5 Room, Area SE QDManufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments andfindings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Although the component is anchored, due to the location in theoverhead and lack of accessibility to that area, this item is notconsidered for the 50% anchorage verification.
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?
Anchorage is visible from a distance below and to the side of the HeatExchanger.
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation?
Anchorage from the component to the steel frame is in good condition.
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near theanchors?Equipment is anchored to a steel frame which sits on embedded platesin the wall. Due to high location on the wall, this is not visible.'Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
YO NOYZ NEI UE! N/AEJYZ NE- ULI N/AZ!YEI' NI- U-- N/AZEN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C73 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 2 of 4Status: YZ NM] U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 022Equipment ID No. E207A Equip. Class Tanks and Heat Exchangers (21)Equipment Description RHR A Loop Heat Exchanger
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?
YE] NE] UEI N/AZ(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for whichan anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Refer to response to question 1 above.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YN NE] UI-potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Interaction Effects7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
Component is covered in lead shielding.
Scaffold at top of HeatExchanger is safety related per scaffold log 12-0 1, ECR 13360 anddoes not pose a seismic hazard.8. Are overhead equipment, distribution
- systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y[ NEI UE] N/A--YZ NE] uE] N/AE]YZ NE] U[-] N/A[E]YN NE] uE-EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C74 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 3 of 4Status: YZ NM UM-ISeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 022Equipment ID No. E207A Equip. Class Tanks and Heat Exchangers (21)Equipment Description RHR A Loop Heat Exchanger Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YED NE] U[-Eadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Area walk-by is on AWC-032.Evaluated by: Gary SwederDate: 10-9-12pLaura Maclay 40LAYYLcC 2A10-9-12EN-DC-1 68 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C75 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 4 of 4Status: YZ N[-] UDSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 022Equipment ID No. E207A Equip. Class Tanks and Heat Exchangers (21)Equipment Description RHR A Loop Heat Exchanger Photographs EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C76 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet I of 4Status: YZ NF UI-]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 024Equipment ID No. M01201-5 Equip. Class, Motor-Operated
& Solenoid-Operated Valves (08)Equipment Description RWCU Suction Line Isolation Location:
Bldg. RB Floor El. 51 RManufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) oom, Area RWCU HXInstructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments andfindings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
In-line component, no anchorage.
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near theanchors?YF- NYI-- N[I U["] N/AOYE" NEI UEI N/AZYEI NEl uLE- N/A[IEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C77 of 0413ATTACHMENT 9.6SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 2 of 4Status: YZ NF U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 024Equipment ID No. M01201-5 Equip. Class Motor-Operated
& Solenoid-Operated Valves (08)Equipment Description RWCU Suction Line Isolation
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?
Yr] NEi Ur] N/AN(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for whichan anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YN NE] U[-]potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Interaction Effects7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution
- systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Long term scaffolding, log 11-99, tag 12169 is erected in the room andis evaluated to show it does not pose an adverse seismic interaction.
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YZ NEI UE] N/AE]YN NEI] uE] N/AE]YZ NE] UE] N/AE]YZ N[-] U-]EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C78 of C413ATrACHMENT 9.6SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 3 of 4Status: YO N-Il UE-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 024Equipment ID No. M01201-5 Equip. Class Motor-Operated
& Solenoid-Operated Valves (08)Equipment Description RWCU Suction Line Isolation Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that couldadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
YZ N[:]UE1Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Valve body is obstructed by shielding.
The Area Walk-By Checklist is AWC-028.Evaluated by: Gary SwederA A-,Date: I-)- -I1EDavid Smalllof /2.EN-DC-1 68 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C79 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 4 of 4Status: Y[ NIjI Ur--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 024Equipment ID No. M01201-5 Equip. Class Motor-Operated
& Solenoid-Operated Valves (08)Equipment Description RWCU Suction Line Isolation Photographs Note: Valve Identification EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage 080 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6Sheet 1 of 5SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMStatus: YZ NF-] U[Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 025Equipment ID No. M01201-80 Equip. Class, Motor-Operated
& Solenoid-Operated Valves (08)Equipment Description RWCU Return Line Isolation Location:
Bldg. RB Floor El. 51 RcManufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) oom, Area RWCU HXInstructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments andfindings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
In-line component, no anchorage
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near theanchors?YE- NZYLI NEI Uil N/A]YEI- NE]l UEr N/AZYEI- NEI urE- N/A;I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C81 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 2 of 5Status: Y[ NOIl U[ISeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 025Equipment ID No. M01201-80 Equip. Class Motor-Operated
& Solenoid-Operated Valves (08)Equipment Description RWCU Return Line Isolation
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?
YI- NFI ULI N/AN(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for whichan anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y[ NEi UI-potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Interaction Effects7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
A ladder at the north end of the room could not be verified to be secure.However, this is not deemed to pose an adverse seismic interaction due to the light weight of an aluminum ladder in comparison to thevalve body.8. Are overhead equipment, distribution
- systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Long term scaffolding, logs 11-99, 11-56, and 11-99 are erected andapproved for use in the room and do not present a potentially adverseseismic interaction.
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y[ N[il Ur] N/Ar]Y[E N[-] Ur] N/AE]YO N[] UI-- N/ALEYO NEL UF-EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-OOOO1, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C82 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 3 of 5Status: YN NEIl UI-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 025Equipment ID No. M01201-80 Equip. Class Motor-Operated
& Solenoid-Operated Valves (08)Equipment Description RWCU Return Line Isolation Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that couldadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
YU NEIUE1Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
The Area Walk-By Checklist is A WC-028.Evaluated by: Gary Sweder,A a...L4 L "-,4 "U,Date: /o-/?-(Z'3David Small-ja 6-7 1112-David SmalEN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C83 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 4 of 5Status: YZ N[-] U--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 025Equipment ID No. M01201-80 Equip. Class Motor-Operated
& Solenoid-Operated Valves (08)Equipment Description RWCU Return Line Isolation Photographs Note: Note:EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-OOOO1, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C84 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 5 of 5Status: YZ NE U[DSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 025Equipment ID No. M01201-80 Equip. Class Motor-Operated
& Solenoid-Operated Valves (08)Equipment Description RWCU Return Line Isolation Note: LadderNote:EN-DC-168 REV 0