ML13232A129

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1, Pilgrim Station Seismic Walkdown Submittal Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Attachment J, Page J78 of J134 Through End
ML13232A129
Person / Time
Site: Pilgrim
Issue date: 06/17/2013
From: Maclay L
Entergy Nuclear Operations
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
2.13.056 PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev 1
Download: ML13232A129 (84)
v • d • e


Text

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment J Page J78 of J134 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 1 of 5 Status: YE NEI U-III Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2- 014 Equipment ID No. 19-HO-179 Equip. Class, Other (0)

Equipment Description Spent Fuel Pool and cavity drains Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. 23' Room, Area Drywell Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO NZ of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YOI NEý UO NIAZ
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YOl NO] UL N/AZ oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YOl NE] UOE N/AZ anchors?

IEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment J Page J79 of J134 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YE NF--] Ur--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2- 014 Equipment ID No. 19-HO-179 Equip. Class2 Other (0)

Equipment Description Spent Fuel Pool and cavity drains

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YEI NDI U-- N/A[

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YE NI-] UD-potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YrI NEI uiD N/AO Robust manual valve.
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YM ND uD N/AD:]

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y[-] NDI UD- N/A[
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YM Nn UD of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

2 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment J Page J80 of J134 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YE NF-I U--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2- 014 Equipment ID No. 19-HO-179 Equip. Class3 Other (0)

Equipment Description Spent Fuel Pool and cavity drains Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ Nil U[I adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Area walk-by is AWC-36 Evaluated by: bAV ,

62 A,1'Y Date:

-SEFF r-LB qu":: *':.14?31L 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment J Page J81 of J134 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YZ N[-- UL--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2- 014 Equipment ID No. 19-HO-179 Equip. Class4 Other (0)

Equipment Description Spent Fuel Pool and cavity drains Photographs Note: Note:

4 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment J Page J82 of J134 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YE Nr-] U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2- 014 Equipment ID No. 19-HO-179 Equip. Classw Other (0)

Equipment Description Spent Fuel Pool and cavity drains I4 UtLW. Note:

5 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment J Page J83 of J134 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 1 of 5 Status: YO NF-- U-I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2- 015 Equipment ID No. pool cavity gates Equip. Class, Other (0)

Equipment Description Spent Fuel Pool and cavity drains Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. 117 Room, Area RefuelFloor Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Wide Gate, Dwq MIM1 12-2 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YI- NN of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Y-I Nil U[-] N/AN
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YE] N] Ur-] N/A ]

oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the Y[-] N[-] UP-] N/AZ anchors?

I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment J Page J84 of J 134 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YZ NEI UL-1 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2- 015 Equipment ID No. pool cavity gates Equip. Class2 Other (0)

Equipment Description Spent Fuel Pool and cavity drains

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YOI NI UFI N/AN (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YN NO Ur-1 potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YOI NO U[- N/A[
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NEI UIU N/A--

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Lamps well supported on rigid conduits.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y-- NEI UD- N/AE
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y[ NEI Ur of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

2 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment J Page J85 of J134 ATrACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YN! NFI- UI--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2- 015 Equipment ID No. pool cavity gates Equip. Class3 Other (0)

Equipment Description Spent Fuel Pool and cavity drains Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NEI- UMI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Gate inspected while removed for refueling. It was hanging on the East wall of the SFP,North of the cattle chute opening.

Area walk-by is A WC-38 Evaluated by: J,ý"/ J.'-A

- I Date:A(,I Date~: __ __ _3 _

"EPF VA'%~s I 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment J Page J86 of J 134 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YZ N--] U--i Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2- 015 Equipment ID No. pool cavity gates Equip. Class4 Other (0)

Equipment Description Spent Fuel Pool and cavity drains Photographs 4 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment J Page J87 of J134 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YE NR UED Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2- 015 Equipment ID No. pool cavity gates Equip. Class5 Other (0)

Equipment Description Spent Fuel Pool and cavity drains Note: Note:

5 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment J Page J88 of J134 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 5 Status: YE NLI-- U--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2- 016 Equipment ID No. pool cavity gates Equip. Class, Other (0)

Equipment Description Spent Fuel Pool and cavity drains Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. 117' Room, Area Refuel Floor Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Narrow Gate, Dwc MIM112-2 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y[:I NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Y[-] NE] U[-J N/AE
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YE] NEil uiJ N/AE oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YE-] NE-] uEr] N/AN anchors?

1 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment J Page J89 of J134 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YE NE] UE]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2- 016 Equipment ID No. gool cavity gates Equip. Class2 Other (0)

Equipment Description Spent Fuel Pool and cavity drains

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? Y[I NE] UE] N/A[

(Note: This question only applies ifthe item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ NEi UE]

potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y[:] NEi UE] N/AM
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YO NE]I UE N/AE]

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Lamps well supported on rigid conduits

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YEI NE] UE] N/AE
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y[ NE] UEi of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

2 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment J Page J90 of J134 ATRACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YZ NFI] U-I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2- 016 Equipment ID No. pool cavity gates Equip. Class3 Other (0)

Equipment Description Spent Fuel Pool and cavity drains Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[ NEI UI-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Gate inspected while removed for refueling. It was hanging on the east wall of the SFP on the south side of the cattle chute opening.

Area walk-by is A WC-38.

Eva~uated 10it De lSM-1 Date:

fV. kAL DAM1 4-/Z~4,1 V

3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment J Page J91 of J134 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YO Nni- UI-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2- 016 Equipment ID No. pool cavity -gates Equip. Class4 Other (0)

Equipment Description Spent Fuel Pool and cavity drains Photographs 4 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment J Page J92 of J134 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YZ Nr--] UI--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2- 016 Equipment ID No. pool cavity gates Equip. Classs Other (0)

Equipment Description Spent Fuel Pool and cavity drains Note: Note:

5 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment J Page J93 of J 134 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 5 Status: YZ N--I U-I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 083 Equipment ID No. X55 Equip. Class, Transformers (04)

Equipment Description Transformerto Y3/Y31 Location: Bldg. RW Floor El. 23 Room, Area MG SET Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y-I NZ of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Refer to response to question #5.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Y; Nn U- N/A[D
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YZ Nn U-- N/AD-oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the Y] Nn UD N/A-anchors?

I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment J Page J94 of J 134 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YE NFIl U[]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 083 Equipment ID No. X55 Equip. Class Transformers (04)

Equipment Description Transformerto Y3/Y31

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? Yr] NE-] U-] N/AE (Note: This question only applies ifthe item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Note: The transformerand its anchorageare different from what is shown in drawing E15A-8, Rev. EO. This is due to the replacementof the transformerper EC 0000016677, Rev. 0.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YE NEl UL-potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YE ND UL- N/AD]

The Unistrut supportingconduits X1200 and A 3025 above X55 has two anchors with nuts that are not fully engaged. The engagement is greaterthan 75% in both cases, and this is judged to be adequate to develop the full strength of the anchor. Therefore, this is not considered a potentialseismic interaction. See attachedphoto.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YE NI-- Ur-] N/AD-and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Masonry wall 194.20 is seismically qualified. See Drawing C-961 SHI, Rev. El.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YE N[:] Uil N/A[-]
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YE N[-- Uil of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment J Page J95 of J134 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YN Nn- U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 083 Equipment ID No. X55 Equip. Class Transformers (04)

Equipment Description Transformerto Y3/Y31 Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YM NEI UI-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments .(Additional pages may be added as necessary)

SWEL 1-083 is on AWC-0 17.

Follow up internalinspectionperformed on 4-29-13. All internalfasteners in place and appeartight.

No loose or missing items observed. No adverse seismic interactionsobserved.

Evaluaed by-.: W wj D",40) 6 t,ivW. s' Date: 3 Jeff Kalb &a ( bqmJi V II P Note: This follow-up internal inspection was performed during PNPS Refueling Outage 19. An Entergy shared resource, David Grimes from Vermont Yankee, performed duties of one SWE team member. Mr. Grimes SWE credentials were verified by review of Vermont Yankee's Phase 1 submittal report VY-RPT-12-00019 Rev.0 (Asset Suite EC40647) Pages 9 and H8.

Mr. Grimes' current Entergy qualification as Seismic Walkdown Engineer was also verified via the Entergy Plateau qualification system as part of the pre-job brief for this walkdown.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment J Page J96 of J134 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YZ NF-] Ur Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 083 Equipment ID No. X55 Equip. Class Transformers (04)

Equipment Description Transformer to Y3/Y31 Photographs Note: Equipment tag VAULW. t-JVCPICIII VICPVV U1 MJUIIJ111VIII

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment J Page J97 of J134 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YZ NEI UD--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 083 Equipment ID No. X55 Equip. Class Transformers (04)

Equipment Description Transformer to Y3/Y31 Note: Nut on Unistrut that is not fully engaged.

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment J Page J98 of J134 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 6 Status: YE N-i Ur--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 084 Equipment ID No. X56 Equip. Class' Transformers (04)

Equipment Description Transformer to Y4/Y41 Location: Bldg. RW Floor El. 23 Room, Area CSR Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings, Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YZ NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YZ NI U[-I N/AR
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YZ N[D] U-l N/AD oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the Y] Nil U[-] N/A--

anchors?

IEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment J Page J99 of J 134 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 6 Status: YZ NE] UE-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 084 Equipment ID No. X56 Equip. Class Transformers (04)

Equipment Description Transformer to Y4/Y41

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YZ NEI UE] N/AE7 (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

The anchorconfiguration matches drawings E15A3 E2, E15A-8 EO, E15A-7 and the SEWs package, detail 3/3. Two additionalbolts were noted for the connection of the panel to the channel. The design in calculation C15.0.3059 specifies 3/16" fillet welds, which also exists at the connection, therefore, the bolts are extra and the configurationis acceptable.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ NEI UE]

potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YN NE]I UM N/AE]

Unistrutsupporting conduit was noted to be within an inch of the top of the cabinet. This is acceptable based on minimal vertical displacement of the cabinet during a seismic event. Panelis also touching the column! wall on the right side. This is acceptable, as the cabinet does not contain essentialrelays and is therefore not prone to chatter.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YE NE] U[-E N/AE--

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YN NEI UE- N/AE]
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YM NEI UE]

of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment J Page J100 of J134 ATrACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 6 Status: YE Nnl UrI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 084 Equipment ID No. X56 Equip. Class Transformers(04)

Equipment Description Transformerto Y4/Y41 Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE NI-] Ur-I adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Area walk-by is AWC-018.

Follow-up internalvisual inspection performed on 4/18/13. Maintenanceof the transformerwas in progressat the time of inspection (W0296640). Fourcables were intentionallyde-terminatedat this time, refer to photo below.

All fasteners were in place with no signs of any being loose.

No loose or missing items were identified.

No potentiallyadverse seismic interactionswere identified.

Evaluatedi by: QSWUaILw Q~ 1191 Date: i J 3.

JeW Kalb

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment J Page J101 of J134 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 6 Status: YE NIIJ U[I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 084 Equipment ID No. X56 Equip. Class Transformers (04)

Equipment Description Transformer to Y4/Y41 Photographs

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment J Page J102 of J134 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 6 Status: YM NFI- U[-]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 084 Equipment ID No. X56 Equip. Class Transformers (04)

Equipment Description Transformerto Y4/Y41 Note: Cabinet anchorage

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment J Page J103 of J134 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 6 of 6 Status: YZ Nr--] Ur-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 084 Equipment ID No. X56 Equip. Class Transformers (04)

Equipment Description Transformerto Y4/Y41

  • or

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment J Page J104 of J134 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 1 of 5 Status: YN ND- UD-1 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 095 Equipment ID No. EPA1 Equip. Class, Instrumentationand Control Panels (20)

Equipment Description RPS Elec ProtectionAssembly Location: Bldg. RW Floor El. 23 Room, Area MG SET Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YM Ni-I of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YE ND- U[-1 N/AD-1
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Y] N[D U[-I N/AD-oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YE Nn Ur N/AEDI anchors?

I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment J Page J105 of J134 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YZ N-- UI-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 095 Equipment ID No. EPA I Equip. Class Instrumentation and Control Panels (20)

Equipment Description RPS Elec ProtectionAssembly

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YZ ND] ULi N/ADl (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

See SEWS package for EPA 1-6, dated 8/4/94.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y[ ND-- UD-potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y[ ND: UD-] N/AD--

Panel D-7 is mounted above EPA I with its cover latch facing the floor, and was examined for an interactioninvolving the cover coming unlatched over EPA 1 during a seismic event. The cover appears to be adequatelylatched and the panel securely anchored,and does not present a seismic interaction concern. See attachedphoto.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YE ND- uD- N/AD-and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Masonry wall 194.20 is seismically qualified. See Drawing C-961 SHI, Rev. El.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YE ND-- uD- N/AD-There is a short, rigid conduit running between EPA 1 and EPA2, as well as a conduit runningfrom EPA I that is in close proximity to EPA2.

Both panels and the conduit are all anchored to the same wall, so this is notjudged to be a seismic interaction hazard. See SEWS package for EPA 1-6, dated 8/4/94, for further confirmation.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YE Nr-- Ur-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment J Page J106 of J134 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YE Nil U-]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 095 Equipment ID No. EPA 1 Equip. Class Instrumentation and Control Panels (20)

Equipment Description RPS Elec ProtectionAssembly Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[ NEI- UI-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

SWELl-095 is on AWC-017.

Follow-up internal visual inspection of panel performed on 12/12/12:

-All internalfasteners in place and appeartight

-No adverse conditions observed A loose label for 194.502A-005-10 was found on top of EPA 1. This was reported to Operations and an ESOMS request was initiated.

Evaluated bv

~.il

  • o- ~ru Date: i=/=/,

kLL I t 02 jV r I j

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment J Page J107 of J134 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YN NE-I UII-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 095 Equipment IDNo. EPA I Equip. Class Instrumentation and ControlPanels (20)

Equipment Description RPS Elec ProtectionAssembly Photographs Note: Equipment tag Note: Overall view of panel

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment J Page J108 of J134 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YZ NF-M Ur--]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 095 Equipment ID No. EPA1 Equip. Class Instrumentation and Control Panels (20)

Equipment Description RPS Elec ProtectionAssembly Note: Cabinet internals

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment J Page J109 of J134 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 1 of 5 Status: YZ ND-- UD Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 096 Equipment ID No. EPA2 Equip. Class, Instrumentation and Control Panels (20)

Equipment Description RPS Elec ProtectionAssembly Location: Bldg. RW Floor El. 23 Room, Area MG SET Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YZ N[D of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YN ND U[i] N/Al]
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Y; ND Ur- N/AD--

oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YM ND UD N/AD-1 anchors?

' Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment J Page J 110 of J134 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YZ ND1 UD-]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 096 Equipment ID No. EPA2 Equip. Class Instrumentationand Control Panels (20)

Equipment Description RPS Elec Protection Assembly

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YO ND] U[i N/AD-I (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

See SEWS package for EPA 1-6, dated 8/4/94.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y[ ND-] UD-potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YE NDI UD- N/AD--
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y[ NDI UD- N/AD-and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Masonry wall 194.20 is seismically qualified. See Drawing C-961 SHI, Rev. El.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y[ ND UD-- N/AD-There is a short, rigid conduit running between EPA 1 and EPA2, as well as a conduit running from EPA 1 that is in close proximity to EPA2.

Conduit B081 is also in close proximity to EPA2, approx. 1.5" away.

The panels and the conduits are all anchored to the same wall, so this is not judged to be a seismic interaction hazard. See SEWS package for EPA 1-6, dated 8/4/94, for further confirmation.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YE ND UD of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment J Page J 11 of J1 34 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YE NEI ULI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 096 Equipment ID No. EPA2 Equip. Class Instrumentation and Control Panels (20)

Equipment Description RPS Elec ProtectionAssembly Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE N[:] ULI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments .(Additional pages may be added as necessary)

SWEL 1-096 is on A WC-017.

Follow-up internal inspection of panel performed on 12/12/12:

-All internalfasteners appearto be in place and tight.

-Small debris found in bottom comer of cabinet and removed by electrician((1) screw, (2) nuts and metal shavings)

-No adverse conditions observed Evaluated by: 2311 ~LJ/ Date: t ,, 4_

I2j1z1J?

I " j

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment J Page J112 of J134 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YE NFIl ULI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 096 Equipment IDNo. EPA2 Equip. Class Instrumentation and ControlPanels (20)

Equipment Description RPS Elec ProtectionAssembly Photographs Note: Equipment tag Note: Overall view of equipment

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment J Page J113 of J134 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YZ NEI U[-]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 096 Equipment ID No. EPA2 Equip. Class Instrumentation and Control Panels (20)

Equipment Description RPS Elec ProtectionAssembly Photographs Note: Cabinet internals Note: Cabinet internalson door

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment J Page J114 of J134 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 6 Status: YZ Nr-] UL-]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 097 Equipment ID No. EPA3 Equip. Class, Instrumentation and Control Panels (20)

Equipment Description RPS Elec ProtectionAssembly Location: Bldg. RW Floor El. 23 Room, Area MG SET Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y[ Nr-of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YZ NE] U[-] N/AF-
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YO NE] U[-- N/A oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YZ NEi Ui N/AD--

anchors?

I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment J Page J115 of J134 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 6 Status: YE ND- U[-

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 097 Equipment ID No. EPA3 Equip. Class Instrumentation and Control Panels (20)

Equipment Description RPS Elec Protection Assembly

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YZ N[-] Ur-- N/Ar-D (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

See SEWS package for EPA 1-6, dated 8/4/94.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YE N[-] UD-potentially adverse seismic conditions?

A small fraction of the lower washers and anchorbolts come below the tab. The amount is insignificant, and the bolts arejudged to securely anchorthe panel to the wall, so this is not considered an adverse condition. See attached photo.

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YN ND U[D- N/AD:]
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YE ND-] uD-I N/AD-and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Masonry wall 194.20 is seismically qualified. See Drawing C-961 SH 1, Rev. El.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NDI UD-1 N/AD--

There is a short, rigid conduit running between EPA3 and EPA4, as well as a conduit runningfrom EPA3 that is in close proximity to EPA4.

Both panels and the conduit are all anchored to the same wall, so this is not judged to be a seismic interaction hazard. See SEWS package for EPA 1-6, dated 8/4/94, for further confirmation.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y] NDI UDl of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment J Page J116 of J134 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 6 Status: YE NFIl UFI-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 097 Equipment ID No. EPA3 Equip. Class Instrumentation and-ControlPanels (20)

Equipment Description RPS Elec Protection Assembly Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE N[-I U--

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

SWELI-097 is on AWC-017.

Follow-up internalinspection of panel performed on 1/9/13:

-No loose or missing fasteners observed

-No other adverse conditions observed Evaluated by: Ž),X4j

.I I Date:

T-C-Ff- ý,ýLB SU k& bNTv .1 /)0)13

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment J Page J117 of J134 A'TACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 6 Status: YE N I Ur-L Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 097 Equipment ID No. EPA3 Equip. Class Instrumentation and Control Panels (20)

Equipment Description RPS Elec ProtectionAssembly Photographs Note: Equipment tag Note: Overall view of panel

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment J Page J118 of J134 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 6 Status: YN ND UFIu Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 097 Equipment ID No. EPA3 Equip. Class Instrumentation and Control Panels (20)

Equipment Description RPS Elec Protection Assembly Note: Typical anchorbolt on bottom of panel. num. lyplucll allullut UUil U11 1UP Ui Pallut.

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment J Page J119 of J134 ATrACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 6 of 6 Status: YE ND-- Ur-]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 097 Equipment ID No. EPA3 Equip. Class Instrumentationand ControlPanels (20)

Equipment Description RPS Elec ProtectionAssembly Note: Cabinet intemals Note: Cabinet intemals

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment J Page J120 of J134 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 5 Status: YE NF UD Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 098 Equipment ID No. EPA4 Equip. Class, Instrumentation and Control Panels (20)

Equipment Description RPS Elec Protection Assembly Location: Bldg. RW Floor El. 23 Room, Area MG SET Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y[ NrI-of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YZ NEI [--] N/AE]
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Y[ NR UDl N/AD-oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YZ N-- UI- N/AD anchors?

I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment J Page J121 of J134 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YE Nn U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 098 Equipment ID No. EPA4 Equip. Class Instrumentation and Control Panels (20)

Equipment Description RPS Elec ProtectionAssembly

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YO NiD UrI N/AFD (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

See SEWS package for EPA 1-6, dated 8/4/94.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YE NEI UI--

potentially adverse seismic conditions?

A small fraction of the lower washers and anchorbolts come below the tab. The amount is insignificant, and the bolts are judged to securely anchorthe panel to the wall, so this is not considered an adverse condition. See attachedphoto.

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y[ ND-- U[I N/AD-
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YE NEI U-- N/Ai-and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Masonry wall 194.20 is seismically qualified. See Drawing C-961 SHI, Rev. El.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y[ ND-] UD- N/AD There is a short, rigid conduit runningbetween EPA3 and EPA4, as well as a conduit runningfrom EPA3 that is in close proximity to EPA4.

Both panels and the conduit are all anchored to the same wall, so this is not judged to be a seismic interactionhazard. See SEWS package for EPA 1-6, dated 8/4/94, for further confirmation.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y[ NDI U[--

of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment J Page J122 of J134 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YZ NFIl UI--]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 098 Equipment ID No. EPA4 Equip. Class Instrumentation and Control Panels (20)

Equipment Description RPS Elec ProtectionAssembly Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y] NEIl UF adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

SWELI-098 is on AWC-017.

Follow-up internalinspection performed on 1/9/13:

-Observed one missing screw on upper left comer of circuitboard at back of panel. Circuit boardhas very low weight/mass and was adequatelysupported by the remaining5 screws. Not a seismic interaction hazard. Screw was replaced by ELAB mechanic that provided access to the panel.

-No other loose or missing fasteners or adverse conditions observed.

Evaluated by: Dayj 0,) )-rI Date:

Sf r-r- kIii LK

~AF k!*Lr~

ia LIA- t>W Ar~ 1/10/13

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment J Page J123 of J134 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YZ NFI- UFi Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 098 Equipment ID No. EPA4 Equip. Class Instrumentation and Control Panels (20)

Equipment Description RPS Elec ProtectionAssembly Photographs Note: Equipment tag Note: Overall view of panel showing anchorage

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment J Page J124 of J134 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YE ND-- UF]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 098 Equipment ID No. EPA4 Equip. Class Instrumentation and ControlPanels (20)

Eauibment Description RPS Elec Protection Assembil Note: Typical anchorbolt on bottom of panel. Note: Cabinet internals

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment J Page J125 of J134 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 1 of 5 Status: YN ND-- UI--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 099 Equipment ID No. EPA5 Equip. Class, Instrumentationand Control Panels (20)

Equipment Description RPS Elec ProtectionAssembly Location: Bldg. RW Floor El. 23 Room, Area MG SET Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y[-] NE of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Due to location on the wall, only two of four anchors are visible, therefore, this component was not chosen for 50% anchorage verification.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YE ND- UD-1 N/AD-Two of four anchors are visible.
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YE N[D] U[] N/ADý oxidation?

Two of four anchors are visible.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YE N[l lD-- N/AD-anchors?

Two of four anchors are visible.

1 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment J Page J126 of J134 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 Status: Y[ NEI UF--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 099 Equipment ID No. EPA5 Equip. Class Instrumentationand Control Panels (20)

Equipment Description RPS Elec ProtectionAssembly

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? Yrll N[-] UrI N/AN (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Refer to response to question # 1.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YM NEI UI potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YE* Nil ur-] N/A[-I YE ND urEI N/AD
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Masonry wall 194.20 is seismically qualified. See Drawing C-961 SHI, Rev. El.

YE NEI Ur1 N/A[-

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

There is a short, rigid conduit running between EPA5 and EPA6. Both panels are anchored to the same wall, so this is not judged to be a seismic interaction hazard. See SEWS package for EPA 1-6, dated 8/4/94, for furtherconfirmation.

YE NDI U[I N/

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment J Page J127 of J134 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YE NF] U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 099 Equipment ID No. EPA5 Equip. Class Instrumentationand Control Panels (20)

Equipment Description RPS Elec ProtectionAssembly Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y NEil UiF adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments .(Additional pages may be added as necessary)

SWELl-099 is on AWC-017.

Follow-up internalinspection performed on 4/2/13:

-All fasteners in place and appeartight

-No loose items observed in panel

-No debris in bottom of panel Evaluated by: JJ JA Date: t -- /

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment J Page J128 of J134 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YE Nr-] UL-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 099 Equipment ID No. EPA5 Equip. Class Instrumentation and ControlPanels (20)

Equipment Description RPS Elec Protection Assembly Photographs Note: Equipment tag Note: EPA5 is on the right

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment J Page J129 of J134 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YM NF] U-I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 099 Equipment IDNo. EPA5 Equip. Class Instrumentation and Control Panels (20)

Equipment Description RPS Elec Protection Assembly Photographs Note: Cabinet internals Note: Cabinet intemals on door

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment J Page J130 of J134 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 1 of 5 Status: YZ NDI U--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 100 Equipment ID No. EPA6 Equip. Class, Instrumentationand Control Panels (20)

Equipment Description RPS Elec ProtectionAssembly Location: Bldg. RW Floor El. 23 Room, Area MG SET Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y- NE of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Due to location on the wall, only two of four anchors are visible, therefore, this component was not chosen for 50% anchorage verification.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YO NEI] UI'- N/AD-Two of four anchors are visible.
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YE NDI ULI N/AD oxidation?

Two of four anchors are visible.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YN ND-- U-- N/AD--

anchors?

There is a surface crack (<1/16') near the bottom left anchorthat is judged to be insignificant.

' Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment J Page J131 of J134 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YZ NF- U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 100 Equipment ID No. EPA6 Equip. Class Instrumentation and Control Panels (20)

Equipment Description RPS Elec ProtectionAssembly

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE] NEI Ui- N/AZ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Refer to response to question #1.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y[ NE] UE]

potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YM NE] UE] N/AD-
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YE NEI UE] N/AE]

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Masonry wall 194.20 is seismically qualified. See Drawing C-961 SHI, Rev. El.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YN NEI U[] N/A[-]

There is a short, rigid conduit running between EPA5 and EPA6. Both panels are anchored to the same wall, so this is not judged to be a seismic interaction hazard. See SEWS package for EPA 1-6, dated 8/4/94, for furtherconfirmation.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y[ NEI UF--

of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment J Page J132 of J134 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YZ N[R UR]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 100 Equipment ID No. EPA6 Equip. Class Instrumentationand Control Panels (20)

Equipment Description RPS Elec Protection Assembly Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN N[] U-I adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

SWELl-100 is on AWC-017.

Follow up internalinspection performed on 4/2/13:

-All fasteners in place and appeartight

-No potential adverse seismic interactionsobserved

-One small screw and two small washers found in the bottom of the panel. They did not appearto have fallen off, most likely left over from previous maintenance. These items were removed by electricalmaintenance escort.

Evaluated by: D6aVu)',n ,,L) L Date: L -j- - 13

-aF VLRQk&t

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment J Page J133 of J134 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YZ NEil Ui--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 100 Equipment ID No. EPA6 Equip. Class Instrumentationand Control Panels (20)

Equipment Description RPS Elec ProtectionAssembly Photographs Note: Equipment tag Note: EPA6 is on the /eft.

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment J Page J134 of J134 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YE NF U[-

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 100 Equipment ID No. EPA6 Equip. Class Instrumentation and Control Panels (20)

Equipment Description RPS Elec Protection Assembly Photographs Note: Cabinet internals Note:

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment K Page K1 of K27 Attachment K Form 9.7: Deferred Area Walk-By Checklists (AWCs)

~1 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment K Page K2 of K27 ATrACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet I of 5 Status: YZ NI Ui-]

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 033 Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. 74' Room, Area, GeneralArea North SWEL Components: SWEL2-11, SWEL2-12 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of Y[ NDI Ur-] N/AD1 potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YO NEI U[:] N/AD-significant degraded conditions?
3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit Y[ N[-] UD1 N/AD--

raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

IIf the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment K Page K3 of K27 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YO NR- UL-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 033 Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. 74' Room, Area GeneralArea North

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YE Ni[] U-- N/A--

spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Fluorescentlight fixture overhead east of HO-1 72 and 173 support chains offset by conduit. Conduit is well supportedbetween the two chains. Load to conduit is small and acceptable. Conduit R931 to 19-FS-4806 (FS is non-safety relatedper Q-list and Asset Suite) fuel pool gate leak detector.

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YE NF- U-I N/AD interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YE ND] Ur- N/AFD interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YE NFI Ur- N/AD-interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Numerous items located east of hoistway but all have wheels locked/

chocked or adequate standoff distance from equipment

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment K Page K4 of K27 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YE NF] uF]

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 033 Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. 74 Room, Area GeneralArea North

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE NE] U--

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Radiation shielding above and west of HO- 173 appears well attached and well labeled, acceptable.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Some minorcracking observed in joints of masonry wall at southwest comer of hoistway approximately 12'-14' up, on the east face of the wall. CR-PNP-2013-1204 initiated,but this was determined by the SWE team to not representan adverse seismic condition based on the location and limited extent of cracking.

    • Note that this area is bounded by the Snubber Cage on the west side-did not do walk-by of snubber shop area because it is separatedfrom the General Area by robust chain link cage. (see photo below)

Evaluated by: Date: 2/27/12 tere _2_z_7/_1

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment K Page K5 of K27 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 4 of 5 Status: Y9 NF Ur-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 033 Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. 74 Room, Area GeneralArea North SWEL Components: SWEL2-11, SWEL2-12 Photographs Note: Cracking, CR initiated, refer to Note: Overall view of area comments above

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment K Page K6 of K27 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YE N-- Ui-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 033 Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. 74 Room, Area GeneralArea North SWEL Components: SWEL2-11. SWEL2-12 Note: Note: Fluorescentlight chain offset by conduit, acceptable,see #4 above.

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment K Page K7 of K27 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet I of 5 Status: YZ NR U-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 034 Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. 74' Room, Areal SFPHx SWEL Components: SWEL2-03. 04. 05. 06. 07. 08. 13 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of Y[ N[l UEiD N/AD--

potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of Y[ NDl U[-I N/A[:]

significant degraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YE NDI u[-] N/AD--

raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

' If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment K Page K8 of K27 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 2 of 5 Status: Y[* ND- UD-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 034 Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. 74' Room, Area SFPHx

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YE ND-] Ur-- N/A[-

spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NEI UD- N/AD-interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

Fire protection line all socket welded and well supported.

1" copper drain water line on south wall well supported.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN NDI UD1 N/AD-interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y[ NDJ UD N/ADl interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment K Page K9 of K27 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YZ NiL ULI--

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 034 Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. 74 Room, Area SFPHx

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NEI Ur-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

-CR-PNP-2013-1195initiatedfor loose nut on hanger P210A discharge. Bolt is in place, nut is 75%

engaged. This condition was determined by SWE team to not represent an adverse seismic interaction/concern.

-Jam nut on a pipe clamp below 19-HO-186 is approximately 50% engagement but tight, the clamp is not connected to anything (see photo below)

-Rolling portable stairnear 19-HO-165 is free to roll but not nearsafety related equipment and has a relatively low weight!mass, therefore acceptable.

-Conduit R1072 pull fitting cover only one bolt hanging open. There are no wires in the conduit, therefore conduit is secure and acceptable with one bolt.

-Panel A-10 has only one screw holding the cover on, but is acceptable (see photo below)

-CR-PNP-2013-1201 initiated for rod hanger for 1" copper demin. line detached at clamp at top of rod, above! north of 19-HO- 166. The next support is approximately 3' downstream, 7' upstream. This condition was determined by SWE team to not representan adverse seismic interaction/concern.

-CR-PNP-2013-1205initiated for 1" copper instrument airline sagging approximately 6" near valve 31-HO-255 in overhead above mesh entry door to room. This condition was determined by SWE team to not representan adverse seismic interaction/concern.(see photos below)

Evaluated by: __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _Date: ,Zj-.

DAIL, "

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment K Page K10 of K27 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YE NLi-- ULI---

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 034 Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. 74 Room, Area SFPHx SWEL Components: SWEL2-03. 04. 05. 06. 07. 08. 13 Photographs Note: uverall area Note: CR initiated for clamp

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment K Page Kll of K27 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YE NRI- UD-7 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 034 Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. 74 Room, Area SFPHx SWEL Components: SWEL2-03, 04, 05, 06, 07, 08, 13 Note: A-IC panel with one bolt holding cover Note: Airline sagging

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment K Page K12 of K27 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet I of 3 Status: YZ NF U[-I Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 035 Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. 23' Room, Area, Main Steam Tunnel SWEL Components: SWEL1-001. 002, 003, 004 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YZ ND U- N/AD potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of Y[ ND U[ N/A[D]

significant degraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YZ ND ulI N/AD raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

IIf the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment K Page K13 of K27 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 2 of 3 Status: YZ NF ULII Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 035 Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. 23 Room, Area Main Steam Tunnel

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN N[I UE] N/AE]

spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN NEI Ur- N/AD-interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

Fire protection line all socket welded and well supported. 1" copper drain water line on south wall well supported.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NDI U-- N/AD-interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN NED U[-I N/AD-interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment K Page K14 of K27 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 3 of 3 Status: YE N[-] URII Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 035 Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. 23 Room, Area Main Steam Tunnel

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[ NEI U[-]

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

-Multiple scaffolds in place for RF019 work: 13-117,13-121, 13-129,13-137, 13-156, all appropriately labeled and green tagged.

-Insulation intentionallyremoved for FW check valve work- laid down on scaffold and on floor. It will be reinstalledduring RFO, therefore acceptable.

-No adverse conditions were found during the area walk-by, therefore no pictures are attached to this form. Refer to SWEL 1-001, -002, -003, -004 for pictures of SWEL items, if needed.

Evaluated by: NI & ) ) xL..4 Date: f 9 S)(F4 L V L bwyU -lq

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment K Page K15 of K27 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet I of 5 Status: YZ NF Ur-I Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 036 Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. 23' Room, Area, Drywell SWEL Components: SWEL2-009, 010, 014 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YE NE-] Ul-- N/AL]

potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

Refer to comments on sheet 3

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YE NE-] uE] N/Ar-significant degraded conditions?
3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YE NE] ur] N/AF-raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

IIf the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment K Page K16 of K27 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YE N[j- Ur Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 036 Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. 23 Room, Area Drywell

4. Does it aooear that the area is free of notentiallv adverse seismic YrI NFl urF- N/AFl spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

No ceiling in this area. Lights are well supportedby rigid conduits.

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y[ N-- U-- N/AD-interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

In general,all equipment in Drywell is qualified for seismic loading.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NDI ulD N/AD-interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

Note that Drywell is inert during power operations.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y[ NDI UDl N/AD-interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Significant maintenance activities in progressat time of walkdown.

Drywell closeoutprocedure walkdown will ensure that all items are removed or secured prior to start up.

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment K Page K17 of K27 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YE NEI- UF-]

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 036 Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. 23 Room, Area Drywell

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[ NEi U--

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Time spent performing walk-by of south side of Drywell 23' was minimized due to very high dose rates at the time.

Evaluated by: Daytj S I (§3,9 LII Date: I'2!3-h 3 7t --V aaL14-V___t ___-

Im.. 71

'3113

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment K Page K18 of K27 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YE NI- Ur--

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 036 Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. 23 Room, Area Drywell SWEL Components: SWEL2-009, 010, 014 Photographs Note: Scao Note:

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment K Page K19 of K27 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 5 of 5 Status: Y[E NEI ULI Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 036 Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. 23 Room, Area Drywell SWEL Components: SWEL2-009, 010, 014 Note:

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment K Page K20 of K27 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 1 of 4 Status: YE NnI U[-

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 037 Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. 41 Room, Area, Drywell SWEL Components: SWELl -023, 034 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YZ N[-] ul- N/A[--

potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

All equipment in this area is anchored to the structureby welds to Drywell liner plate or Bioshield wall plate.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YZ NEI UEI N/A[--

significant degraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit Y[ NEI ui-- N/A[-I raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

' If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment K Page K21 of K27 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 2 of 4 Status: YZ NI-- UI-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 037 Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. 41 Room, Area Drywell

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN NEI U[:] N/AEZ spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

No ceiling in this area. Lights are well supported by rigid conduits.

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN NEI UEZ N/AD--

interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

In general,all equipment in Drywell is qualified for seismic loading.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YE NDI U[- N/AD-interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

Note that Drywell is inert during power operations.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN NDI Ur- N/AD-I interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Significantmaintenance activities in progress at time of walkdown.

Drywell closeout inspection will ensure that all items are removed or secured priorto start up.

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment K Page K22 of K27 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 3 of 4 Status: YE! N-- U-]

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 037 Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. 41 Room, Area Drywell

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE Nni Ur-]

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Concrete shielding blocks were identified in the NIB Nozzle penetration of the Bioshield wall with no restraintsteel in place.

CR-PNP-2013-3008was initiatedfor this condition. It was determined that these blocks should have been removed per plant design change in previous outage. WO 349326 to remove blocks scheduled for 516/13 prior to restart. As of May 2 8th, this activity has been completed as confirmed by site personnel.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: )L vý& / ,- ) h Date:

I3tr-F- 6VA ký bMi 4V. Ji

I Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment K Page K23 of K27 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 4 of 4 Status: YE NI1 U--

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 037 Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. 41 Room, Area Drywell SWEL Components: SWELl -023, 034 Photouraohs Note: Concrete shielding blocks Note:

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment K Page K24 of K27 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet I of 4 Status: YZ NEI U[-

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 038 Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. 117 Room, Areal Refuel Floor SWEL Components: SWEL2-015. 016 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of Y[J NDI U-- N/AD-potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YE NDI UE N/AD significant degraded conditions?
3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YO NDI u[-] N/AD-raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

' If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment K Page K25 of K27 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 2 of 4 Status: YE NI I U--

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 038 Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. 117 Room, Area Refuel Floor

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YE NEI U[-] N/AD spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

No ceiling in this area. Lights are well supportedby rigid conduits.

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NDI U[-- N/AD interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

Fire Protectionpiping well supportedand socket welded joints.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NDl U-- N/AD--

interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

None observed. Note that gates are underwaterduring plant operationsand refueling.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YO ND U[ N/AD interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Much equipment and material staged in the area due to ongoing refueling activities.

The general area surroundingthe SFP is classified as a 'safe location' per PNPS Seismic Interaction HazardProcedure 1.17. 1.

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment K Page K26 of K27 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 3 of 4 Status: YZ NiF U-II Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 038 Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. 117 Room, Area Refuel Floor

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NEI] U]

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

The SFP inlet line siphon breakers were specifically viewed and photographedas part of this walk-by. They were found to be in place with no obvious seismic interaction concerns.

Comments .(Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Area included in this walkby was South, West and North sides of spent fuel pool (West of Rx Cavity).

Evaluaed bY - oJ Date;

,-S~f¶Pf-~. _ __ _

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment K Page K27 of K27 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 4 of 4 Status: YE NI] U-]

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 038 Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. 117 Room, Area Refuel Floor SWEL Components: SWEL2-015. 016 PhotoaraDhs I

Note: Note: NE Siphon Break A

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML13232A129&oldid=2087840"