ML13232A135

PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1, Pilgrim Station Seismic Walkdown Submittal Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Attachment C, Page C251 of C413 Through Page C331 of C413

ML13232A135
Person / Time
Site:	Pilgrim
Issue date:	06/17/2013
From:	Maclay L Entergy Nuclear Operations
To:	Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
2.13.056 PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev 1
Download: ML13232A135 (81)

Text

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C251 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 4 Status: Y] NE] UDý Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 065 Equipment ID No. -C2257B Equip. Class, Instrument Racks (18)

Equipment Description RCIC Instrument Rack Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. 2.75 Room, Area SWQD Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y[ N[]

of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YE NE] UE] N/AE]

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YE NE] UE] N/AE--

oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the Y[ NE] UE] N/A[:]

anchors?

I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C252 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 Status: YZ NE-] uF--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 065 Equipment ID No. C2257B Equip. Class Instrument Racks (18)

Equipment Description RCIC Instrument Rack

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YZ NRI ULI N/AL]-

(Note: This question only applies ifthe item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchorage was verified by a spot check for dimensions and configuration using SEWS sheet.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ N[] U-I potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y; NE] U[] N/A[]

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YE NE] U[-] N/A-]

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Block walls 91.3 and 91.2 in vicinity of SWEL 1-065 is safety related (C950Sh 1, EO) therefore does not pose a seismic interactionhazard.

Overhead lighting hooks verified to be closed hooks.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NLI U[-] N/AL]

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y[ NR Ur]

of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C253 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 Status: YO NEI Ur-L Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 065 Equipment IDNo. C2257B Equip. Class Instrument Racks (18)

Equipment Description RCIC Instrument Rack Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Yo NE] UE-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Area Walkby Checklist is AWC-006.

Evaluated by: Laura Maclay A w x Date: 10-4-12 Gary Sweder uLw ,b , 10-4-12

.0 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C254 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 Status: YZ NE] U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 065 Equipment ID No. C2257B Equip. Class Instrument Racks (18)

Equipment Description RCIC Instrument Rack Photographs Note: Note:

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C255 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 1 of 5 Status: YZ NR U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 066 Equipment ID No. C2258 Equip. Class, Instrument Racks (18) -

Equipment Description RCIC Instrument Rack Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. 2.75 Room, Area SWQD Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YN Nil of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Verified using SEWS sheet for this piece of equipment.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YZ N[] U[-] N/A[-]

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YZ NEIl UE N/AZ]

oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YZ NEI ur N/A[Z anchors?

' Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C256 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 Status: Y] NF] U--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 066 Equipment ID No. C2258 Equip. Class Instrument Racks (18)

Equipment Description RCIC Instrument Rack

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? Y[ N[I U[-- N/AEj (Note: This question only applies ifthe item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchorage was verified by a spot check for dimensions and configuration using SEWS sheet.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ NEI Uil potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YN NEI uE]1 N/AE]

A ladder from a Work in Progresssite was resting on C2258 equipment. CR-PNP-2012-04379 was written to relocate ladder to a properlocation. (See Picture) Ladder was verified as relocatedby CR, therefore this question may be answered "Yes".

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y[ NEI uE- N/A[]

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Block walls 91.3 and 91.2 in vicinity of SWEL1-066 is safety related (C950Sh 1, EO) therefore does not pose a seismic interactionhazard.

Overheadlighting hooks verified to be closed hooks.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y[ NEI UE] N/AE]

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NEi Uil of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C257 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 5 Status: Y[ NEI UM-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 066 Equipment ID No. C2258 Equip. Class Instrument Racks (18)

Equipment Description RCIC Instrument Rack Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[D NEil UI-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Area Walk-By Checklist is A WC-006.

Evaluated by: Laura Maclay ~~6V2ci Date: 10-03-12 cary ,Swied&r qwade 10-03-12 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C258 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 5 Status: Y] NFI- U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 066 Equipment ID No. C2258 Equip. Class Instrument Racks (18)

Equipment Description RCIC Instrument Rack Photographs EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C259 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YZ NE] UI-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 066 Equipment ID No. C2258 Equip. Class Instrument Racks (18)

Equipment Description RCIC Instrument Rack Note:

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C260 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 5 Status: YZ ND UD]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 067 Equipment ID No. LT1001-650A Equip. Class' Instrument Racks (18)

Equipment Description Rx Water Level Transmitter Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. 23 Room, Area East Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Yr NZ of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

The component is attachedto instrument rack C2251B, which is anchored to the floor. This rack is not in the scope of the SWEL; therefore, the item was not chosen for 50% verification.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Y[ NEI U[-] N/AD-

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YZ ND:] UD1 N/AD--

oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YZ NDl UD1 N/AD-anchors?

There is a very tight crack ( < 1/16") in the concrete under 10-DPIS-261-12B. Due to the small width of the crack, this is determined not to be an adverse seismic condition.

IEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C261 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 Status: Y[ NR Ur Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 067 Equipment IDNo. LT1001-650A Equip. Class Instrument Racks (18)

Equipment Description Rx Water Level Transmitter

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? Y--] NEi UI- N/AN (Note: This question only applies ifthe item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YN NEil UI-potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y[ N[-] UI-- N/AZ--

There is a plastic catch trough on the floor in front of the rack. It is held in place by blocks, and is judged to be light enough to not cause any damage to the instrumentation if it were to come loose during a seismic event. Therefore, this is not considered to be a potentiallyadverse seismic interaction.See photo "PNPS10-11-12 TI 018" on Share Point.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y[ N[E] U[I N/A--

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YM N[:] U[-] N/AF-

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YM N[il U[]

of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C262 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YN NEI- UI-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 067 Equipment ID No. LT1001-650A Equip. Class Instrument Racks (18)

Equipment Description Rx Water Level Transmitter Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y0 NI] UE]

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

SWEL 1-067 is on AWC-016.

Evaluated by: David Small 01,6-1-XJ/. Date: 10/11/2012 Halie Aroz ow  : 10/11/2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C263 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 5 Status: Y[ NEI Ur-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 067 Equipment ID No. LT1001-650A Equip. Class Instrument Racks (18)

Equipment Description Rx Water Level Transmitter Photographs Note: Note:

EN-DC-1 68 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C264 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 5 Status: Y[ NI j U-IJ Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 067 Equipment ID No. LT1001-650A Equip. Class Instrument Racks (18)

Equipment Description Rx Water Level Transmitter Note: Instrument rack C2251B anchor bolts. Note:

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C265 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 1 of 5 Status: Y[ NFI U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 068 Equipment ID No. LT1001-650B Equip. Class, Instrument Racks (18)

Equipment Description Rx Water Level Transmitter Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. 23 Room, Area West Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YF-l NZ*

of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

The component is attached to instrument rack C2252B, which is anchored to the floor. This rack is not in the scope of the SWEL; therefore, the item was not chosen for 50% verification.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YZ NEI UW1 N/A[-]

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YZ NEI U[i N/AD-oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YZ NWl Ur- N/AD-anchors?

I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C266 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YZ NF U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 068 Equipment ID No. LT1001-650B Equip. Class Instrument Racks (18)

Equipment Description Rx Water Level Transmitter

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YO-- N[-1 UI] N/AN (Note: This question only applies ifthe item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YS N[D] UD-potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ ND-] U[I N/AEF

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NDl UD- N/AD-and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

There is a light fixture south of the component that has an S-hook that is noticeably less crimped than the others in the area. Upon close inspection, it can be seen that the closure is still sufficient to prevent the eye-hook of the fixture from coming loose during a seismic event.

Therefore, this is not considered to be a seismic interaction concern.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NEI UEI N/A[-]

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NEl UFI of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C267 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YN NiE ur-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 068 Equipment ID No. LT1001-650B Equip. Class Instrument Racks (18)

Equipment Description Rx Water Level Transmitter Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[9 NEI UI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

SWEL 1-068 is on AWC-014.

Evaluated by: David Small Date: 10/11/2012 Ha/ie Aroz vn -Qrý - 10/11/2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C268 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YN NR-'j UL-]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 068 Equipment ID No. LT1001-650B Equip. Class Instrument Racks (18)

Equipment Description Rx Water Level Transmitter Photographs Note:

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C269 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YZ NE] Ur-D Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 068 Equipment ID No. LTIOOI-650B Equip. Class Instrument Racks (18)

Equipment Description Rx Water Level Transmitter Note: Anchorage of C2252B instrumentation Note:

rack.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C270 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 4 Status: Y[ NEII UDl Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 069 Equipment ID No. LT263-72A Equip. Classi Instrument Racks (18)

Equipment Description Rx Water Level Transmitter Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. 51 Room, Area East Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL, The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y[-I NO*

of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

This component is anchoredto instrument rack C2205A. The SEWs package for the rack conservatively evaluates one of four various instrumentrack anchoragesin the area. This specific rack was not evaluated, and therefore configurationcan not be verified by the package. The anchorageof the component to the rack is not included in the 50% verification; however, all bolts are visible, so the remainder of this section is applicable.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YZ NEI UI- N/A--]

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YZ N[:] UrI N/AZ--

oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YZ NEI Ur-] N/A--]

anchors?

Attached to rack C2205A, see SWEL1-061.

'Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C271 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 Status: YZ NE] UI-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 069 Equipment ID No. LT263-72A Equip. Class Instrument Racks (18)

Equipment Description Rx Water Level Transmitter

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? Y[-I NF] U-I N/AO (Note: This question only applies ifthe item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Refer to response to question #1.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YE NEI UE-potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NE] U[- N/A[-]

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y[ NE-] UE- N/AE]

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y[ NE-] U[] N/AE-

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NEI U[-

of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C272 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 Status: YZ NEI UrI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 069 Equipment ID No. LT263-72A Equip. Class Instrument Racks (18)

Equipment Description Rx Water Level Transmitter Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y0 NEI UrI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

SWEL 1-069 is on AWC-021.

Evaluated by: Laura Maclav *1" a.*,* . Date: 10/17/2012 Halie Aroz i j 10/17/2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C273 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 Status: YZ N[:] U--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 069 Equipment ID No. LT263-72A Equip. Class Instrument Racks (18)

Equipment Description Rx Water Level Transmitter Photographs Note:

EN-DC-1 68 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C274 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 4 Status: Y[ NFi UI-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 070 Equipment ID No. LT263-72B Equip. Class, Instrument Racks (18)

Equipment Description Rx Water Level Transmitter Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. 51 Room, Area West Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL, The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YF-] NZ*

of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

This component is anchored to instrument rack C2206A. The SEWs package for the rack conservatively evaluates one of four various instrument rack anchoragesin the area. This specific rack was not evaluated, and therefore configuration can not be verified by the package. The anchorage of the component to the rack is not included in the 50% verification; however, all bolts are visible, so the remainder of this section is applicable.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YZ NEI U[I- N/Ai-

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YZ NE] U[-] N/AD oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YZ NE] UI N/AD-anchors?

The transmitteris mounted to a safety related instrument rack, C2206A, which is anchored to the concrete floor. Anchorage at the floor is free of cracking.

I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C275 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 Status: YN NF- Ur Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 070 Equipment ID No. LT263-72B Equip. Class Instrument Racks (18)

Equipment Description Rx Water Level Transmitter

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE] NE-- UE- N/A]

(Note: This question only applies ifthe item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y[g NE] UI-potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NE] uE] N/AE]

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NE] uE:] N/AE-]

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Masonry block walls 65.8 and 65.10 are seismically qualified. See Drawing No. C-943 SH 1.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y[ NE] UE-] N/AE]

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ Nil U[E]

of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C276 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKUST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 Status: YZ NEI UM Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 070 Equipment ID No. LT263-72B Equip. Class Instrument Racks (18)

Equipment Description Rx Water Level Transmitter Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y0 NEI UEI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Area walk-by is AWC-020.

Evaluated by: Laura Maclay O T d:La , Date: 10-17-12 Halie Aroz 0 10-17-12 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C277 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 Status: YN NF UF Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 070 Equipment ID No. LT263-72B Equip. Class Instrument Racks (18)

Equipment Description Rx Water Level Transmitter Photographs Note: Overall view of equipment Note: Back of mounting plate EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C278 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 5 Status: YZ N-- UI--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 071 Equipment ID No. C154 Equip. Class' Instrumentation and Control Panels (20)

Equipment Description RCIC Alt Shutdown Panel Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. 23 Room, Area West Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YM Nr-of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Verified using E532Sh25, E2

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YZ NE] U[i N/A[:'

Small anchoron base plate that is not part of anchorage drawing. This is not considered partof the anchorage and does not adversely affect the anchorage.

Bolt on bottom of panel at slight angle, however the bottom cover is secure, therefore acceptable.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Y[ NEI Uil N/AD--

oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the Y[ NEI UiE N/AD--

anchors?

IEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-1 68 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C279 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YZ NEI ULI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 071 Equipment ID No. C154 Equip. Class Instrumentationand ControlPanels (20)

Equipment Description RCIC Alt Shutdown Panel

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YN N[-] U-] N/A-]

(Note: This question only applies ifthe item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Verified using E532Sh25, E2. Anchorage visually verified and physically measuredwith tape measure.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YS NEil U-I potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YE NEI UE] N/A]

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YN NEil UEL N/AE]

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Block wall 63.1 (C994 1Sh 1, El) is safety related, therefore seismically qualified and acceptable.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NE] UFL N/A[]

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y; NEJ UE]

of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

EN-DC-1 68 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C280 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YZ NF UD Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 071 Equipment ID No. C154 Equip. Class Instrumentation and Control Panels (20)

Equipment Description RCIC Alt Shutdown Panel Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[ NE] UE adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Area walk-by is A WC-0 12.

P.1ai~naed hu: r~Arv .Wq ,ýA I,,, 1,ý -kOAjL-..k- Date: 10-18-12 U

Laura Maclav 10-18-12 Li k)i EN-DC-168 REV 0

I Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C281 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 5 Status: Y[ NI- UMI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 071 Equipment ID No. C154 Equip. Class Instrumentation and Control Panels (20)

Equipment Description RCIC Alt Shutdown Panel Photographs Note: Overall panel EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C282 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YN NEI uril Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 071 Equipment ID No. C154 Equip. Class Instrumentation and ControlPanels (20)

Equipment Description RCIC Alt Shutdown Panel WsIMlI II:U Note: Anchorage Note:

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C283 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 1 of 4 Status: Y[ Nn U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 072 Equipment ID No. C156 Equip. Class, Instrumentationand ControlPanels (20)

Equipment Description ADS Alt Shutdown Panel Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. 23 Room, Area East Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y[-l NZ of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Anchorage to unistrut is visible but two upper anchorsfrom unistrut to wall are not.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YZ NEI UI-] N/AD'-

Six of eight anchors are visible.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YN N-I U'- N/AD oxidation?

Six of eight anchors are visible.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YN NDI U-- N/AD anchors?

Six of eight anchors are visible.

' Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C284 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 Status: YE Nr- U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 072 Equipment ID No. C156 Equip. Class Instrumentation and Control Panels (20)

Equipment Description ADS Alt Shutdown Panel

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YL] NF-I Ur] N/As (Note: This question only applies ifthe item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Refer to response to question #1.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y; NEI ULI potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y; NEI U[--] N/AL]

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ N[-] U[] N/A[]

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Overheadtransformeris adequately restrainedon wall mounted support, therefore acceptable.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NEI LiE] N/AE!

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NEI UL of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C285 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 Status: Y[ NEI ur-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 072 Equipment ID No. C156 Equip. Class Instrumentationand Control Panels(20)

Equipment Description ADS Alt Shutdown Panel Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[ NEI u[]

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Area walk-by is AWC-016.

Evaluated by: Laura Maclay - Date: 10-18-12 U

V I Gary Sweder YAciii1 A., W-kA 10-18-12 Garv wede EN-DC-1 68 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-OOOO1, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page 0286 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 Status: Y[* N]I ULII (SWC) SWELl- 072 Seismic Walkdown Checklist Equipment ID No. C156 Equip. Class Instrumentationand Control Panels (20)

Equipment Description ADS Alt Shutdown Panel Photographs Note: Equipment tag EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C287 of C413 ATrACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 4 Status: YN NEI U--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 073 Equipment ID No. C157 Equip. Class, Instrumentationand Control Panels(20)

Equipment Description ADS Alt Shutdown Panel Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. 23 Room, Area West Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

SEWS package used to verify anchorage.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YE NEI ur- N/A[:]

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YE NEI ULI N/Ar-]

oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YE NEI UF- N/A--

anchors?

IEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C288 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 Status: YO ND- UD1 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 073 Equipment ID No. C157 Equip. Class Instrumentation and Control Panels (20)

Equipment Description ADS Alt Shutdown Panel

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YZ NEi UI- N/AD-(Note: This question only applies ifthe item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Equipment is bolted to 2 horizontal Unistruts. Unistruts are attachedto wall. The anchorage is verified to be consistent with SEWS package for this equipment.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YN ND] UD-potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YN ND: uD-] N/AD:

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y[ NDI UD- N/AD-and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y[ ND1 UD- N/AD

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ Nn-U1 of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

EN-DC-1 68 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C289 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 Status: YZ NE] U'I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 073 Equipment ID No. C157 Equip. Class Instrumentationand ControlPanels (20)

Equipment Description ADS Alt Shutdown Panel Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[D N[i U[I-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

The Area Walk-By Checklist is A WC-014.

Evaluated by: Laura Maclay la-o,-,V L_" Date: 10-18-12 Gary Sweder A., 10-18-12 EN-DC-1 68 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C290 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 Status: YZ Nn-I U--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 073 Equipment ID No. C157 Equip. Class Instrumentationand Control Panels (20)

Equipment Description ADS Alt Shutdown Panel Photographs MUM-. NOW;~ UI~fJIGiU r-d[/ieI lF WdIlKUOWTl EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C291 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 5 Status: YN N-' ujF1 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 074 Equipment ID No. C159 Equip. Class, Instrumentationand ControlPanels (20)

Equipment Description RCIC Remote Shutdown Panel Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. 23 Room, Area West Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Verified using E532Sh25, E2

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Y[ NE] ULI N/AL]-

Small anchoron base plate that is not part of anchorage drawing. This is not consideredpart of the anchorageand does not adversely affect the anchorage.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YE NM U[:] N/A-oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YN N[] Ui:] N/AD--

anchors?

IEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C292 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YZ NE] U-I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 074 Equipment ID No. C159 Equip. Class Instrumentationand Control Panels (20)

Equipment Description RCIC Remote Shutdown Panel

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YZ NEI] U[ N/AD-(Note: This question only applies ifthe item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Verified using E532Sh25, E2. Anchorage visually verified and physically measured with tape measure.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ NDI UD-potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NDI UD-] N/AD1 Nearby boxes securely wheel-locked.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YD-1 NZ UD1 N/AD--

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Block wall 63.1 (C994 1Shl, El) is safety related, therefore seismically qualified and acceptable.

Open "S"hook on light fixture overhead. This cabinet does not contain relays; therefore this potential interactionis not significant.CR-PNP-2012-04685 has been written to address this item.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ ND] uD1 N/AD-

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YD-1 NZ UFD of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

See Response #8.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C293 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YZ NEI Ui-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 074 Equipment ID No. C159 Equip. Class Instrumentation and Control Panels (20)

Equipment Description RCIC Remote Shutdown Panel Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YM NW- UF--

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

The Area Walk-By Checklist is AWC-012.

Evaluated by: Gary Sweder z 6 AUL& rkL Date: 10-18-12 Laura Maclay q V4UC 10-18-12 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C294 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 5 Status: Y] NI- U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 074 Equipment ID No. C159 Equip. Class Instrumentation and Control Panels (20)

Equipment Description RCIC Remote Shutdown Panel Photographs Note: Overall view of equipment and properly Note: Anchorage. Note small anchoron base anchoredI&C cart. plate that is not on drawing. This is not considered partof equipment anchorage.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-OOOO1, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C295 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YZ NR uri Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 074 Equipment ID No. C159 Equip. Class Instrumentationand Control Panels (20)

Equipment Description RCIC Remote Shutdown Panel W I Note: Open cabinet Note: Open "S"hook EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C296 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 1 of 6 Status: Y[ ND] UD--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 075 Equipment ID No. C170 Equip. Class, Instrumentation and ControlPanels (20)

Equipment Description Post Accident MonitoringPanel Location: Bldg. RW Floor El. 37 Room, Area CR Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y[-] NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Not all anchors are visible; therefore, the cabinet was not chosen for 50% verification.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Y; NEI UiZ N/AI--

Fourout of six anchors were visible.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YZ NEI U[i N/A--

oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YZ NEI UEr N/A[-]

anchors?

IEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C297 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 6 Status: Y[ NF- U--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 075 Equipment ID No. C170 Equip. Class Instrumentation and ControlPanels (20)

Equipment Description Post Accident Monitorinq Panel

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YI- NI] U-I N/AN (Note: This question only applies ifthe item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ NEI] UI potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y[-] NZ* U[--1 N/AF-]

Xerox machine PNP662has an aspect ratio of approx. 4:1, which is greaterthan the allowable of 2:1 per Procedure 1.17.1, Rev. 12 for a free-standing item in close proximity to safety-related equipment. CR-PNP-2012-04631 was written to address the concern.

A coat rack with an aspect ratio greaterthan 2:1 is in close proximity to the cabinet,but this can be classified as furnitureper Procedure 1.17.1, Rev. 12. This classification and its low mass indicate that it is not considereda seismic interaction hazard.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NI] Ur] N/AE]

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NI] UI] N/Ar-I

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YI NZ U-]

of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C298 of C413 ATrACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 6 Status: YN NEI Ur-]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 075 Equipment ID No. C170 Equip. Class Instrumentationand Control Panels (20)

Equipment Description PostAccident Monitoring Panel Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[D N[] Ut]

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

SWEL 1-075 is on AWC-027.

Evaluated by: David Small Date: 10/16/2012 Hafle Aroz 10/16/2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0

~1 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C299 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 6 Status: YZ NIF U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 075 Equipment ID No. C170 Equip. Class Instrumentation and ControlPanels (20)

Equipment Description Post Accident Monitoring Panel Photoqraphs Note: Note: C170 is on the left.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page 0300 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 6 Status: YZ N[* U[--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 075 Equipment ID No. C170 Equip. Class Instrumentation and Control Panels (20)

Equipment Description PostAccident Monitorinq Panel Note: Panel interior. Note: Typical anchorbolt.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C301 of C413 ATRACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 6 of 6 Status: Y[ No UD--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 075 Equipment ID No. C170 Equip. Class Instrumentationand Control Panels (20)

Equipment Description Post Accident Monitorinct Panel EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C302 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 6 Status: Y[ NEI U--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 076 Equipment ID No. C171 Equip. Class, Instrumentation and Control Panels (20)

Equipment Description Post Accident Monitorinq Panel Location: Bldg. RW Floor El. 37 Room, Area CR Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y[ NEl of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YZ NEI UEi N/AZJ

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YE NEI] ULI N/AZl oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YZ NE uE-] N/Ar-anchors?

1 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C303 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 6 Status: YE NF U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 076 Equipment ID No. C171 Equip. Class Instrumentationand ControlPanels (20)

Equipment Description Post Accident Monitoring Panel

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YZ NE- UE- N/AF-E (Note: This question only applies ifthe item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

See C 170 SEWS package dated 3/19/96.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ NE] UEi potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YN N[-] U[l N/AEI There is a bookshelf next to the panel; however, it is anchored to the wall with an L-bracket and is not considered to be a seismic interaction concern. See attachedphoto.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YN N[E UE- N/AEI and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y[ NEr- UEi N/AEI

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y[ NE-I U of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

EN-DC-1 68 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C304 of C413 ATrACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 6 Status: YE NEI U"-E Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 076 Equipment ID No. C171 Equip. Class Instrumentationand Control Panels (20)

Equipment Description PostAccident Monitoring Panel Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YU NE-' UEr adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

SWEL1-076 is on AWC-027.

Evaluated by: David Small I Date: 10/16/2012 Halie ArozMaVO6-, 10/16/2012 C)

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C305 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 6 Status: YM NF Ur-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 076 Equipment ID No. C171 Equip. Class Instrumentation and ControlPanels (20)

Equipment Description PostAccident Monitoring Panel Photographs Note: Note: C171 is on the right.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C306 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 6 Status: Y[ NI UD--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 076 Equipment ID No. C171 Equip. Class Instrumentation and ControlPanels (20)

Equipment Description PostAccident Monitoring Panel EN-DC-1 68 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C307 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 6 of 6 Status: YE N[] UrI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 076 Equipment ID No. C171 Equip. Class Instrumentation and ControlPanels (20)

Equipment Description Post Accident Monitoring Panel Note: Bookshelf adjacent to panel. Note: Bookshelf anchorage to wall.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C308 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 5 Status: YZ NF UF-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 077 Equipment ID No. C930 Equip. Class, Instrumentationand Control Panels (20)

Equipment Description RCIC Relay Vertical Board Location: Bldg. RW Floor El. 23 Room, Area CSR Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YN NEl of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Y[ N[il U[-I N/A[]

Noted two of four anchorbolts to the floor are missing washers. This was confirmed and accepted in the SEWs package. Three of twelve visible anchors connecting the cabinets together are missing washers.

Due to the robust connection and size of anchors,this is acceptable.

Noted missing screw and two nuts for sheet metal fillerplate. Due to extremely small size of bolt and nut this is not a seismic concern and is judged to be satisfactory.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YN N[-] U[-] N/Al]

oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the Y[ NEn UnI N/An-anchors?

IEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C309 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 Status: Y[ NE] ULI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 077 Equipment IDNo. C930 Equip. Class Instrumentationand ControlPanels (20)

Equipment Description RCIC Relay Vertical Board

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YS NEI U[-] N/A-1 (Note: This question only applies ifthe item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Refer to the SEWs package for anchorage configuration.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YN NEI UrI potentially adverse seismic conditions?

All cabinets in the row are bolted together with anchorbolts in the front and rearof the panel spanning from the floor to the top of panel. This is confirmed by the SEWs package.

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YE NE] uE] N/A[-]

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YE NE] uEr N/A[-]

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YE NEI UE] N/AE-

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YE NE] UM of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C310 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YE NEI UF-1 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 077 Equipment ID No. C930 Equip. Class Instrumentationand Control Panels (20)

Equipment Description RCIC Relay Vertical Board Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE NW-] Ur-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Area walk-by is A WC-0 18.

Evaluated by: Halle Aroz Date: 10-17-12

~ J.U Laura Maclay ŽIGAUI2 VW 16aC&OL 10-17-12 0

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C311 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YZ Nr j U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 077 Equipment ID No. C930 Equip. Class Instrumentation and Control Panels (20)

Equipment Description RCIC Relay Vertical Board Photographs Note: Cabinet equipment tag and interior Note: Base of cabinet-interior EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C312 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 5 Status: Y; NEi U-I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 077 Equipment ID No. C930 Equip. Class Instrumentationand ControlPanels (20)

Equipment Description RCIC Relay Vertical Board Note: Anchor bolt to connect adjacent cabinets EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C313 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 4 Status: Y; NE] UD Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 078 Equipment ID No. LI100I-650A Equip. Class' Instrumentationand Control Panels (20)

Equipment Description Rx Water Level Indicator Location: Bldg. RW Floor El. 37 Room, Area CR Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE- NZ of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

The component is mounted in cabinet C170, which is anchoredto the floor. See SWEL 1-075 for anchorageverification.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YE[- NEl U[] N/AZ

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YEJ N[E UEr N/A[R oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YEJ NE] Ur- N/AZ anchors?

I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C314 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 Status: YN N[W U-]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 078 Equipment ID No. LIIOO1-650A Equip. Class Instrumentation and Control Panels (20)

Equipment Description Rx Water Level Indicator

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE] NEr] UFI N/A[

(Note: This question only applies ifthe item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ NEI U[-]

potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NEI Ur- N/AL

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NEW UW N/AL and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y[ NW-- UEW N/AL

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C315 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 Status: YN Nn UL-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 078 Equipment ID No. LI1001-650A Equip. Class Instrumentationand Control Panels (20)

Equipment Description Rx Water Level Indicator Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NEI U[]

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

SWEL 1-078 is on AWC-027.

Evaluated by: David Small a)

KjJ Date: 10/16/2012 Halie Aroz 10/16/2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C316 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 Status: YZ No U--i Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 078 Equipment ID No. LI1001-650A Equip. Class Instrumentationand Control-Panels(20)

Equipment Description Rx Water Level Indicator Photographs I14 UW. Note:

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C317 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 4 Status: YZ NF- U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 079 Equipment ID No. LI1001-650B Equip. Class' Instrumentationand Control Panels (20)

Equipment Description Rx Water Level Indicator Location: Bldg. RW Floor El. 37 Room, Area CR Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE- NZ of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

The component is mounted in cabinet C171, which is anchored to the floor. See SWEL 1-076 for anchorage verification.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YE-] NEI UM N/AN

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YEI NEI UEl N/AN oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the Y[-] NEl U[- N/Az anchors?

' Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C318 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 Status: YN NIF U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 079 Equipment ID No. LI100I-650B Equip. Class Instrumentation and Control Panels (20)

Equipment Description Rx Water Level Indicator

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE-] N[i U[- N/AM (Note: This question only applies ifthe item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ NEI UEi potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NEI UEi N/AEl

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YE NEI UE- N/AE-and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y[ NEI uE:] N/AEl

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y[ NEi UEi of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C319 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 Status: YO NEIr Ur-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 079 Equipment ID No. LI1001-650B Equip. Class Instrumentationand Control Panels(20)

Equipment Description Rx Water Level Indicator Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YM N[-- UE]

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

SWELl-079 is on AWC-027.

Evaluated bv: David Small

.............. j-L-rj IL) Date: 10/16/2012 Halie Aroz 10/16/2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C320 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 Status: YZ NEI-I U--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 079 Equipment ID No. LIIOOI-650B Equip. Class Instrumentationand Control Panels (20)

Equipment Description Rx Water Level Indicator Photographs EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C321 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 5 Status: YZ N--] UIý Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 080 Equipment IDNo. D7 Equip. Classi Motor ControlCenters and Wall-Mounted Contactors(01)

Equipment Description 125VDC MOV Motor Control Cntr Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. 23 Room, Area West Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y[-] NE of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Cabinets could not be opened because of plant operating considerations,therefore, anchorage is not visible. Due to inaccessibility,this item is not chosen for anchorage verification.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Y[E N[:] UL] NIAZ See Response #1

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YEI NEIl ULII N/AM oxidation?

See Response #1

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YEll NEIl ULI] NIAZ anchors?

See Response #1 1 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-1 68 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C322 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 Status: Y[ ND UD Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 080 Equipment ID No. D7 Equip. Class Motor Control Centers and Wall-Mounted Contactors (01)

Equipment Description 125VDC MOV Motor Control Cntr

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YF- ND urI N/AN (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

See Response #1

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ Nn U[I potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Although floor anchors are not visible, panel fasteners and overall cabinet fabrication appearfree of adverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YN ND UD] N/A[D Cabinetsare securely bolted together.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ ND UD] N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NDI UDuN/AD

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YN NEI Ur-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-OQOO1, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C323 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YZ NF U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 080 Equipment ID No. D7 Equip. Class Motor Control Centers and Wall-Mounted Contactors (01)

Equipment Description 125VDC MOV Motor Control Cntr Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NEI U--

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Operations does not allow this panel to be opened while in service and it very rarely is taken out of service. Additionally, the arrangementof the panel is such that it would require extensive supportby Maintenance Dept to gain access to the cubicles and the lower internalspace where anchorageis located (dozens of threadedfasteners). This is further complicated by the fact that the entire panel is housed within a relatively tight fitting environmental enclosure that makes such access even more challenging. This panel is therefore considered to be not accessible for intemal inspectionper the methodology/criteriaof this inspectionprogram.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

The Area Walk-By Checklist is AWC-015 Evaluated by: Gary Sweder .ALJ Q , 16 a --%, Date: IL-18-12 U

I n~irn AAme.ln Laura~~ a

'~nJ1AOTJY~ o~c Pw 10-18-12 V1 U EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C324 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YZ NE] U--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 080 Equipment ID No. D7 Equip. Class Motor Control Centers and Wall-Mounted Contactors (01)

Equipment Description 125VDC MOV Motor Control Cntr Photographs EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C325 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 5 Status: Y[ NE] U--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 080 Equipment IDNo. D7 -Equip. Class Motor Control Centers and Wall-Mounted Contactors (01)

Eauipment Description 125VDC MOV Motor Control Cntr Note: Cabinet Rear Note:

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C326 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 6 Status: Y[ NE] UE--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 081 Equipment IDNo. A5 Equip. Class' Medium Voltage, Metal-CladSwitchgear (03)

Equipment Description 4KV Emergency Bus Location: Bldg. TB Floor El. 37 Room, Area A SWGR Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y[E] NZ of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Although the panel is anchored,the reardoor is inaccessible, therefore it was not chosen for the 50% verification.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Y[ NE]I UE N/AE]

The front of panels A5-2 and A5-9 are missing a single bolt in each. An eye hook on the back of panel A5-2 is not engaged and is hanging out of the panel. The back of panel A5-4 is missing an eyehook. CR-PNP-2012-4535 was written.

A small screw inside of the panel, connecting a bracket to a wire chase is missing. This is a redundantbracket and it is holding a small chase of wires, therefore, this does not pose any hazard.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Y] NEI UE] N/AE-]

oxidation?

On anchoragethat is visible within the cabinet, it is free of corrosion.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the Y[ NE] UE] N/AE]

anchors?

Visible anchorageat the front of the panel is free of cracking in the concrete.

Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C327 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 6 Status: Yo NF UD Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 081 Equipment ID No. A5 Equip. Class Medium Voltage, Metal-CladSwitchgear (03)

Equipment Description 4KV Emergency Bus

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YL- ND:] UD- N/AZ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Refer to response to question #1.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ NEI] U]

potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Each panel is bolted together as verified in the SEWS package, therefore not a seismic hazard.

Small tag stating "ManualClosed" is attached by two small screws.

One small screw is missing but the tag is still present. This is not a seismic concern and since the tag is still intact, adequate.

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YD- NO UD- N/AD-Inside panel, components are adequatelysecured. The outside of the cabinet is robust and free of interactionfrom other equipment or systems.

Operationlocker next to A5 is not adequatelysecured to the floor or wall as visually inspected from the outside and could fall into nearby panel during a seismic event. The locker is approximately4.5' away from A5. The locker is approximately 6' tall. CR-PNP-2012-04544 is written to address this seismic concern. A 1.17.1 proceduralevaluation was performed as action to remedy seismic concern.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YO ND] UD- N/A[-D and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

There are no block walls in the immediate area and cable trays are adequately filled.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NDI UD- N/AD-

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YE] NO ur-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

See Response #7.

EN-DC-1 68 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C328 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 6 Status: YZ NE] U[--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 081 Equipment IDNo. A5 Equip. Class Medium Voltagqe, Metal-Clad Switchcqear (03)

Equipment Description 4KV Emerqency Bus Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NDI UFD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments .(Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Area walk-by is AWC-022.

FvAIuatAcI bw Laura Maclay Evaluated bv: Laura Ma v 40maLLA -NOLoC -0&14 Date: 10-11-12 V I U,

rvnr1,.wadar A en&A. I\ vk)Pd L-A 10-11-12 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C329 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 6 Status: Y[ NEI- UFi Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 081 Equipment ID No. A5 Equip. Class Medium Voltage, Metal-Clad Switchgear(03) -

Equipment Description 4KV Emergency Bus Photographs L" 7 TR :1; FEEED M TO 13US A-5 BKR 152-501 Note: Equipment tag EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-OOOO1, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C330 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 6 Status: YZ NE] UL' Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 081 Equipment ID No. A5 Equip. Class Medium Voltage, Metal-CladSwitch-gear(03)

Eauioment Description 4KV Emeraencv Bus Note: Missing bolt on front of panel Note: Missing eyehook on rearof cabinet EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C331 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 6 of 6 Status: Y[ NF- U-I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 081 Equipment ID No. A5 Equip. Class Medium Voltagqe, Metal-Clad Switchqear(03)

Eauibment DescriDtion 4KV Emeraencv Bus Note: Operations locker nearA5 Note:

EN-DC-168 REV 0