ML13232A131

PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1, Pilgrim Station Seismic Walkdown Submittal Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Attachment C, Page C1 of C413 Through Page C84 of C413

ML13232A131
Person / Time
Site:	Pilgrim
Issue date:	06/17/2013
From:	Maclay L Entergy Nuclear Operations
To:	Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
2.13.056 PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev 1
Download: ML13232A131 (84)

Text

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C1 of C413 Attachment C Form 9.6: Seismic Walkdown Checklists (SWCs)

SWCs Removed:

SWELl -083, SWELl -084, SWELl -095, SWELl -096, SWELl -097, SWELl -098, SWELl -099, SWELl-100 Updated final versions of these SWCs, which required follow-up internal electrical cabinet inspections, are included in Attachment J.

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C2 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 5 Status: YZ NF- UI--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 005 Equipment ID No. CV305-127 Equip. Class' Pneumatic-OperatedValves (07)

Equipment Description RPS Scram Water Outlet Valve Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. 23 Room, Area 145 HCU Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y-I NE of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Inline component, no anchorage.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YZ Nn U[I N/A[Z Note: Checked anchorageof HCU to concrete.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Y[ N[-] UF-] N/AZ oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the Y[ NEil U[I N/AZ-]

anchors?

1 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C3 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YZ NE] UE]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 005 Equipment ID No. CV305-127 Equip. Class Pneumatic-OperatedValves (07)

Equipment Description RPS Scram Water Outlet Valve

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE NFE UE N/AE (Note: This question only applies ifthe item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y[E NE] UF]

potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YN NEI UE- N/AE-The air operatoron HCU 26-39 is close to the horizontal Unistrut, but is not in contact with it. There is sufficient clearance so that this is not considered to be a potentialadverse seismic interaction.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YN NEI UE- N/AE-and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YE N[-] Url N/A--

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YN NEI U--

of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C4 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YN NEI- Ur]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 005 Equipment IDNo. CV305-127 Equip. Class Pneumatic-OperatedValves (07)

Equipment Description RPS Scram Water Outlet Valve Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN N[-] UI]

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Detailed inspections were performed and photos taken of 2 of the 145 C V305-127 valves: HCU 26-39 (West) and on HCU 42-19 (East). The remainderof the CV305-127 valves were inspected for overall configuration compliance along with their HCU assembly as partof the area walk-by. Note that this included a detailed visual inspection of the anchoragesof all HCUs.

SWELI-O05 is on AWC-014 andAWC-016.

Evaluated by: David Small I) }uI Date: 10/18/2012 Halie Aroz 10/18/2012 EN-DC-1 68 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C5 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 5 Status: Y; NE] UM Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 005 Equipment ID No. CV305-127 Equip. Class Pneumatic-OperatedValves (07)

Equipment Description RPS Scram Water Outlet Valve Photographs EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C6 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 5 Status: Y[ NFIj U-I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 005 Equipment ID No. CV305-127 Equip. Class Pneumatic-OperatedValves (07)

Equipment Description RPS Scram Water Outlet Valve Note: Typical CV305-127 valve. Note: Typical HCU anchorage.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C7 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 4 Status: Y[ NEIl UI-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 006 Equipment ID No. SOV305-117-1/4 Equip. Classi Motor-Operated& Solenoid-OperatedValves (08)

Equipment Description RPS Grp 1/4 Scram Pilot Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. 23 Rioom, Area 145 HCU Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE[ NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Inline component, no anchorage.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YEI NEI U[E] N/AZ

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YE] NE] U[I N/A]

oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the Y[-] N[]i UEi N/A[

anchors?

1 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C8 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 Status: YZ NI I UI-J Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 006 Equipment IDNo. SOV305-117-1/4 Equip. Class Motor-Operated& Solenoid-OperatedValves (08)

Equipment Description RPS Grp 1/4 Scram Pilot

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? Y[] NE] UI- N/AZ (Note: This question only applies ifthe item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ N[L ULI potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ N[: uEr N/AL]

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YN NEJ U[I N/AL]

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NEI U[-] N/A[]

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YE N- UL-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C9 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 Status: YZ NEI UL-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 006 Equipment IDNo. SOV305-117-1/4 Equip. Class Motor-Operated& Solenoid-OperatedValves (08)

Equipment Description RPS Grp 1/4 Scram Pilot Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NEI UF adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

A detailed inspection was performed andphotos taken of one of the 73 SO V305-117-1/4 scram pilots:

HCU 26-39 (West). The remainderof the SOV305-117-1/4 scram pilots were inspected for overall configuration compliance along with their HCU assembly as part of the area walk-by. Note that this included a detailed visual inspection of the anchoragesof all HCUs. DrawingNo. M1N16-7, Rev. El identifies HCU 26-39 as part of Set 1.

The component did not have a tag on any of the HCUs, and so was identified using the P&ID, Drawing No. M250 SH1, Rev. 73.

SWEL1-006 is on AWC-014.

Evaluated by: David Small J

ý - Date: 10/11/2012 H-alie Aroz 10/11/2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C10 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 Status: YZ N-- UD-]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 006 Equipment ID No. SOV305-117-1/4 Equip. Class Motor-Operated&Solenoid-Operated Valves (08)

Equipment Description RPS Grm 1/4 Scram Pilot Photographs Note: Note: Typical component (SOV305-117-1/4 on bottom).

EN-DC-1 68 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page Cll of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 4 Status: YZ NE] UL-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 007 Equipment ID No. SOV305-117-2/3 Equip. Class, Motor-Operated& Solenoid-Operated Valves (08)

Equipment Description RPS Grp 2/3 Scram Pilot Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. 23 Room, Area 145 HCU Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y[-] NZ of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Inline component, no anchorage.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Y[-] N[-] uE]- N/AN

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Y[I- N[E] UE N/AZ oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YE] NEI U[I N/AN anchors?

IEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-O0001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C12 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 Status: YZ NE] U[-1 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 007 Equipment ID No. S0V305-117-2/3 Equip. Class Motor-Operated& Solenoid-OperatedValves (08)

Equipment Description RPS Grp 2/3 Scram Pilot

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE] NF] Ur] N/AZ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YE NEI UI-potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NE] UE-] NIAE]

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NF-] UE] N/AE]

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NE]I UE N/AEl

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C13 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 Status: Y; NEI U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 007 Equipment IDNo. S0V305-117-2/3 Equip. Class Motor-Operated& Solenoid-OperatedValves (08)

Equipment Description RPS Grp 2/3 Scram Pilot Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[ NEI U[:

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

A detailedinspection was performed and photos taken of one of the 72 SOV305-117-2/3 scram pilots:

HCU 42-19 (East). The remainderof the SOV305-117-2/3 scram pilots were inspected for overall configurationcompliance along with their HCU assembly as part of the area walk-by. Note that this included a detailed visual inspection of the anchoragesof all HCUs. DrawingNo. MIN16-7, Rev. El identifies HCU 42-19 as part of Set 3.

The component did not have a tag on any of the HCUs, and so was identified using the P&ID, Drawing No. M250 SH1, Rev. 73.

SWEL 1-007 is on AWC-016.

Evaluated by: David Small  ?/4"j) V,-A Date: 10/18/2012 HalteAroz 10/18/2012

()

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C14 of C413 ATrACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 Status: YZ NF U--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 007 Equipment ID No. SOV305-117-213 Equip. Class Motor-Operated& Solenoid-OperatedValves (08)

Equipment Description RPS Grp 2/3 Scram Pilot Photographs Note: Note: Typical component (SO V305-117-2/3 on bottom).

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-O0001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page 01 5 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 4 Status: Y[ N[- U[--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 008 Equipment ID No. SOV305-118-1/4 Equip. Class' Motor-Operated& Solenoid-OperatedValves (08)

Equipment Description RPS Grp 1/4 Scram Pilot Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. 23 R oom, Area 145 HCU Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE-I NE of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Inline component, no anchorage.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YE-- NE] UE[ N/As

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YE] NE] UE] N/A[

oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YE] N[-] UE] N/A[

anchors?

Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C16 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 Status: YZ NE] UDl Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 008 Equipment ID No. SOV305-118-1/4 Equip. Class Motor-Operated& Solenoid-OoeratedValves (08)

Equipment Description RPS Grp 1/4 Scram Pilot

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE] N[] UE] N/AZ (Note: This question only applies ifthe item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YE NEI U[-]

potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YN NEI ur] N/Ar]

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y[ N-] ur] N/AF]

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YN NEI U] N/A[]

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y~N N]UM]

of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

EN-DC-1 68 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-QOOO1, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C017 of 0413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 Status: YO( NM UM-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 008 Equipment ID No. SOV305-118-1/4 Equip. Class Motor-Operated&Solenoid-OperatedValves (08)

Equipment Description RPS Grp 1/4 Scram Pilot Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Yo( NEI UE' adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

A detailedinspection was performed and photos taken of one of the 73 SOV305-118-1/4 scram pilots:

HCU 26-39 (West). The remainderof the SOV305-118-1/4 scram pilots were inspected for overall configurationcompliance along with their HCU assembly as part of the area walk-by. Note that this included a detailed visual inspection of the anchoragesof all HCUs. Drawing No. M1N16-7, Rev. El identifies HCU26-39 as part of Set 1.

The component did not have a tag on any of the HCUs, and so was identified using the P&ID, Drawing No. M250 SHI, Rev. 73.

SWEL 1-008 is on AWC-014.

Evaluated by: David Small Q0=j L'P Date: 10/11/2012 Halie Aroz r/ ll 10/11/2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C18 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 Status: YZ ND Ur-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 008 Equipment ID No. SOV305-118-1/4 Equip. Class Motor-Operated& Solenoid-Operated Valves (08)

Equipment Description RPS Grp 1/4 Scram Pilot Photographs Note: Note: Typical component (SO V305-118-1/4 on top).

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-O0001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page 019 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 1 of 4 Status: YZ No U--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 009 Equipment ID No. SOV305-118-2/3 Equip. Class, Motor-Operated& Solenoid-OperatedValves (08)

Equipment Description RPS Grp 2/3 Scram Pilot Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. 23 R oom, Area 145 HCU Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YI- NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Inline component, no anchorage.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YI-] NE] UE] N/A[

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Y[-] NEJ UE] N/A[

oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YEr- NEJ UE] N/As anchors?

IEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C20 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 Status: YZ NE] Ur Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 009 Equipment ID No. SOV305-118-2/3 Equip. Class Motor-Operated& Solenoid-OperatedValves (08)

Equipment Description RPS Gro 2/3 Scram Pilot

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? Y[] NE] UE] N/AZ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ NWI U[--

potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NE-] UE[] N/AE-]

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NE] uE] N/AE-]

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NE] UE"] N/AE-]

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ N-] uE]

of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-OOOO1, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C21 of 0413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 Status: YN NEI] U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 009 Equipment ID No. SOV305-118-2/3 Equip. Class Motor-Operated& Solenoid-OperatedValves (08)

Equipment Description RPS Grp 2/3 Scram Pilot Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NE] UE[

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

A detailed inspection was performed and photos taken of one of the 72 SOV305-118-2/3 scram pilots:

HCU 42-19 (East). The remainderof the SOV305-118-2/3 scram pilots were inspected for overall configuration compliance along with their HCU assembly as part of the area walk-by. Note that this included a detailed visual inspection of the anchoragesof all HCUs. Drawing No. MIN16-7, Rev. El identifies HCU 42-19 as part of Set 3.

The component did not have a tag on any of the HCUs, and so was identified using the P&ID, Drawing No. M250 SH1, Rev. 73.

SWEL 1-009 is on AWC-016.

Evaluated by: David Small ,i2~jyLu Date: 10/18/2012 Halle Aroz 10/18/2012 k.../

EN-DC-1 68 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C22 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 Status: Y[ NIE U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 009 Equipment ID No. SOV305-118-2/3 Equip. Class Motor-Operated& Solenoid-OperatedValves (08)

Equipment Description RPS Grp 2/3 Scram Pilot Photographs Note: Note: Typical component (SOV305-118-2/3 on top).

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C23 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 1 of 5 Status: YZ NF Ur-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 010 Equipment ID No. P203A Equip. Class, Vertical Pumps (06)

Equipment Description RHR Pump A Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. -17.5 Room, Area SE QD Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y[-7 NZ of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

This is an anchored component, but due to lead shielding, one of the anchorbolts cannot be visually inspected, therefore, this is not part of the 50% anchorage verification.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YE Nr7 UD7 N/A[l Three visible anchors are in good condition.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YE NDl U[-] N/A-oxidation?

Three visible anchors are free of oxidation.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YN ND UD- N/A[-D anchors?

A surface crack is visible near one anchor,but since all bolts are cast in place in the foundation, this is not a structuraldeficiency. Although one anchorbolt and nut is not visible, the concrete next to this and all other anchors is visible and free of cracking.

1 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C24 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YE NEr] UD]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 010 Equipment ID No. P203A Equip. Class Vertical Pumps (06)

Equipment Description RHR Pump A

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE] N] Ur- N/AS (Note: This question only applies ifthe item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Three anchors match drawing C-100 and SEW's package.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YE NE: UE-potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ N[-] uEr N/AEF

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YN NE UE- N/AE1 and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YN NE- UE[ N/AE1

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NEI U-]

of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C25 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YZ N13 UD--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 010 Equipment ID No. P203A Equip. Class Vertical Pumps (06)

Equipment Description RHR Pump A Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y; NEi ULi adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Area walk-by is on A WC-032.

Evaluated by: Gar Sweder A~. IW~.4A~ Date: 10-9-12 0

Laura Maclay VI ILIJ'TYCL IO4 10-9-12 UJ EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C26 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 5 Status: Y[ NE] Ur-1 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 010 Equipment ID No. P203A Equip. Class Vertical Pumps (06)

Equipment Description RHR Pump A Photographs Note: Equipment tag Note: Partialview of anchorage EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-OOOO1, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C27 of 0413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YE NIE U-I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 010 Equipment ID No. P203A Equip. Class Vertical Pumps (06)

Equipment Description RHR Pump A Note: Overall view Note: Surface crack, refer to response in question #4.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C28 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 4 Status: YZ Nr-' U' Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 011 Equipment ID No. P203C Equip. Class' Vertical Pumps (06)

Equipment Description RHR Pump C Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. -17.5 Room, Area SE QD Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YI-- NE of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Pump is an anchored component, but due to lead shielding, only two anchors are visible, therefore this item is not part of the 50% anchorage verification.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YIE Nr- Ur-I N/A-Z Two visible anchors are in good condition.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YE NEIl ur- N/Ar-oxidation?

Two visible anchors are free of corrosion.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YN NEI U[-- N/ADl anchors?

Although two anchorbolts are not visible, the area near the bolts is free of cracking.

'Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C29 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 Status: YZ NE] U--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 011 Equipment ID No. P203C Equip. Class Vertical Pumps (06)

Equipment Description RHR Pump C

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YEI NEI UI- N/A[D (Note: This question only applies ifthe item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Refer to response to question #1 above.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y[ NEil UE-potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Two anchors visible and in good condition.

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NE] UE[ N/A[-

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NE] UE-- N/A--

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YN NE] UE[- N/AE--

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YN N-] Ur]

of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C30 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 Status: YZ{ NEI Ul Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 011 Equipment ID No. P203C Equip. Class Vertical Pumps (06)

Equipment Description RHR Pump C Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO N[-] UI-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Area walk-by is on AWC-032.

Evaluated by: Gary Sweder J3i. .. & _ Date: 10-9-12 Laura Maclay V . O.\ \ 10-9-12 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C31 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 Status: YE NF- UD" Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 011 Equipment ID No. P203C Equip. Class Vertical Pumps (06)

Equipment Description RHR Pump C Photographs Note: Equipment tag Note: Two anchors not visible due to lead shielding, note pedestal near anchorageis visible.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C32 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 5 Status: YZ ND] U[i Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 012 Equipment ID No. P205 Equip. Class, Horizontal Pumps (05)

Equipment Description HPCI Pump Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. -17.5 Room, Area HPCI RM Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YZ N[-]

of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YZ NEI ULI N/AD-

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Y[ NDI Ui- N/AD-oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YZ Nr- Ur- N/AD-anchors?

Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C33 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YN NEI U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 012 Equipment ID No. - P205 Equip. Class Horizontal Pumps (05)

Equipment Description HPCI Pump

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YO Ni] Ui- N/A--

(Note: This question only applies ifthe item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchorage configurationverified and dimensions spot checked using C185, E7 and C186, E3.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YO N[i U[i potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YO NE] U[i N/A[--

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YE7 NO UEi N/AEl and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Open S-hook on southwest side of pump. CR-PNP-2012-04594 was written to address the issue and it has been wired to secure it.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YO NE-] UEi N/AE

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YE-- NO UEl of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

See Response #8.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C34 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YZ NE] UI-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 012 Equipment ID No. P205 Equip. Class Horizontal Pumps (05)

Equipment Description HPCIPump Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y21 NEi U-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Area walk-by is AWC-04.

P205 is not directly labeled in the field. Label request was entered in eSOMS to have the item label created.

The turbine and the pump are on different skids. However the concrete pedestals are quite rigid and are tied together. Therefore there is no potentialfor differentialmovement between pump and driver.

This was confirmed by the SEWs package.

Evaluated by: Ga Sweder / A Date: 10-15-12

-0I.-.

Laura Maelav YWYLAý "fnCa DQUA- 10-15-12 4

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C35 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YZ No- U]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 012 Equipment ID No. P205 Equip. Class Horizontal Pumps (05)

Equipment Description HPCI Pump Photographs Note: P205 is not directly labeled, therefore Note: View of pump and anchorage the equipment is verified by its adjoining components.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-OOOO1, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C36 of 0413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YN NEI uL-]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 012 Equipment ID No. P205 Equip. Class Horizontal Pumps (05)

Equipment Description HPCI Pump Note: Open S-hook Note:

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-OOO01, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C37 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 1 of 4 Status: Y[ N[-] U --

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 013 Equipment ID No. MO1001-16A Equip. Classi Motor-Operated& Solenoid-Operated Valves (08)

Equipment Description RHR A Loop Ht Exch Bypass Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. -3 R oom, Area SE QD Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y[- NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Inline component, no anchorage.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YF-1 NEi U[-I N/A[

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YEI NEI UE- N/A[

oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the Y-I NEI UEr N/A[

anchors?

Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-O0001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C38 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 Status: YZ NE] UL-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 013 Equipment ID No. MOIOOI-16A Equip. Class Motor-Operated& Solenoid-OperatedValves (08)

Equipment Description RHR A Loop Ht Exch Bypass

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? Y] N[-] U[-] N/A0 (Note: This question only applies ifthe item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YO NE! ULi potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NEI uE] N/AE]

There is a large scaffold near the component, but it has a tag stating it has been seismically evaluated. Therefore, it does not present a seismic interactionconcern.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y[ NEI UE] N/AE]

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YE NE] UE] N/AE]

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YE NE] U-]

of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

EN-DC-1 68 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-OOOO1, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C39 of C41 3 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 Status: YE NEl U[]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 013 Equipment ID No. Mor101-16A Equip. Class Motor-Operated& Solenoid-OperatedValves (08)

Equipment Description RHR A Loop Ht Exch Bypass Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO NEI UE1 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

The body of the valve is insulatedand so is not visible. All other visible components were checked during the walkdown.

SWEL 1-013 is on AWC-007.

Evaluated by: David Small 912j I,,J] Date: 10/09/2012 Halie Aroz 10/09/2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page 040 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 Status: Y¥ ND ULI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 013 Equipment ID No. MO1001-16A Equip. Class Motor-Operated& Solenoid-OperatedValves (08)

Equipment Description RHR A Loop Ht Exch Bypass Photographs Note: Note:

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C41 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 5 Status: Y[ NR- U[--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 014 Equipment ID No. A8 Equip. Class' Medium-Voltage, Metal-Clad Switch-gear (03)

Equipment Description 4KV Emercq Buss Location: Bldg. N/A Floor El. 23 Room, Area YARD Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YI- NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Due to lack of visual verification of rearcabinet anchors,this was not chosen for the 50% verification.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YO NE!I UiE N/All Anchorage at the back of the panel is not visible without breaking the plane of the cabinet,but anchorsat the front of the cabinet are in good condition.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YE NE! UL- N/AZ!

oxidation?

Anchor bolt on outside of cabinet securing a clip is corrodedand the threads of the anchor are no longervisible. CR-PNP-2012-04509 was written to correct the issue. The corrosion is only on the surface with no apparentloss of metal thickness. Therefore there is no loss of strength and the hold down plates will perform their design function. The one anchorbolt is fused to the nut by general but localized corrosion.

Although they are fused there is no flaking of metal or any apparent reduction in bolt or nut diameter. Therefore there is no loss of strength and the anchorwill perform its design function.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YE NEI UiE N/Ar-anchors?

' Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C42 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YZ NF U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 014 Equipment IDNo. A8 Equip. Class Medium-Voltage, Metal-Clad Switch-gear (03)

Equipment Description 4KV Emerq Buss

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE] N[i ULi N/A]

(Note: This question only applies ifthe item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Refer to question #1.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y[ NEI UEr potentially adverse seismic conditions?

This component was a previous outlier for IPEEE. The addition of clips, verified in the field, was completed. Refer to question #3 above for explanation of bolt corrosion at clip.

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NEI Ur- N/A[:]

Maintenance tools (flashlight, screwdriver,etc.) are located next to the panels, but per procedure 1.17.1, this is acceptableplacement and does not pose a seismic hazard.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YN NEI Un N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

This component is locatedin a small enclosure specifically designed for this equipment. It is in good condition. Light bulbs within the cabinets are plastic coated and do not pose a seismic hazard.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y[ NEJ U-- N/AD--

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y[ NE-I U -

of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

A small plastic hose next to the batteries inside of the panel was noted.

Due to restaintsof not breaking the plane of the cabinet while it is open, it could not be determinedif this is partof the battery assembly. It does not pose a seismic risk.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C43 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YE NF UI-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 014 Equipment ID No. A8 Equip. Class Medium-Volta-ge, Metal-Clad Switchqear(03)

Equipment Description 4KV Emer, Buss Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE NEI- UI-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Floor of Diesel Gen Breaker-152-181is visible corroded. CR-PNP-2012-04540 was written to correct the issue.

Comments .(Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Area walk-by is A WC-026.

C~n .1

--V GtU

-t9 4

k1,a I n ja~ Y 4 ~lA aoSS t OOl~ Date: 10-11-12 v

• U)

Gary Sweder }7Jk-U IL -~- 10-11-12 0~

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C44 of C413 ATrTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YZ NE] UMI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 014 Equipment ID No. A8 Equip. Class Medium-Voltage, Metal-Clad Switchgear (03)

Equipment Description 4KV Emerci Buss Photographs EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-OOOO1, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C45 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 5 Status: Y[ NFI U-I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 014 Equipment ID No. A8 Equip. Class Medium-Volta-ue, Metal-Clad Switch-gear (03)

Equipment Description 4KV Emerq Buss Note: Inside of panel closest to entrance door. Note: Close-up of corroded anchor Note corroded anchorclip and anchor.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page 046 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 5 Status: YZ NE] ULI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 015 Equipment ID No. MO1001-28A Equip. Class, Motor-Operated& Solenoid-OperatedValves (08)

Equipment Description RHR A Loop LPCI Iniection Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. 23 R oom, Area A VLV Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE- NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

In-line component, no anchorage

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YE] NE-] Ur N/A]

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YE- NE: uE- N/AZ oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YE: NE] Ur- N/AN anchors?

1 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C47 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 Status: Y[ NFI U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 015 Equipment IDNo. MO100I-28A Equip. Class Motor-Operated& Solenoid-OperatedValves (08)

Equipment Description RHR A Loop LPCI Injection

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YLI Nil UM- N/A[

(Note: This question only applies ifthe item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y[ NEI] U[I]

potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ N[-] U- N/AD-

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ N["] UL- N/A[-]

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Masonry walls 63.4, 63.5, and 63.6 (C941Shl, El) are safety related, therefore seismically qualified and acceptable.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y[ NE] U'- N/AD]

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y[ NEI UF of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

EN-DC-1 68 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-OOOO1, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page 048 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YE NEI UrI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 015 Equipment ID No. MO1001-28A Equip. Class Motor-Operated& Solenoid-OperatedValves (08)

Equipment Description RHR A Loop LPCI Iniection Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NEI UE-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

A broken placardwas noted on the valve body. This is a generalhousekeeping concern,not a seismic interactionhazard, and was reported to Operations for suggested fix.

Area Walk-By is on A WC-0 11 C Imltarl

,.V i IU CIý*

hI-

• .4 nr. Qwnwrodar Vtl U- I'It.

~. . ..

US69A Y\. ~

%' aC%+/- Date: 16- /1 -/Z-.

- U David Small AA i1 ,

EN-DC-1 68 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-OOOO1, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C49 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YN NE] ULI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 015 Equipment ID No. MO1001-28A Equip. Class Motor-Operated& Solenoid-OperatedValves (08)

Equipment Description RHR A Loop LPCI Injection Photographs Note: Label Note: View of Valve EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-OOOO1, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C50 of C41 3 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YZ NF Ur-]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 015 Equipment ID No. MO1001-28A Equip. Class Motor-Operated& Solenoid-OperatedValves (08)

Equipment Description RHR A Loop LPCI Injection Photographs Note: Broken Placard Note:

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-O0001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C51 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 1 of 4 Status: Y[ NE UE Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 016 Equipment ID No. MO1001-29A Equip. Class' Motor-Operated& Solenoid-Operated Valves (08)

Equipment Description RHR A Loop LPCI Injection Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. 23 R oom, Area A VL V Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y[-] NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

In-line component, no anchorage

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YE-] NEi uE-] N/AN

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YE[- NE] U[-] N/A[

oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YE- NEI UEi N/A]

anchors?

1 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix 13: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-1 68 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-O0O01, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page 052 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 Status: Y[ NF U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 016 Equipment ID No. MO100I-29A Equip. Class Motor-Operated& Solenoid-OperatedValves (08)

Equipment Description RHR A Loop LPCI Injection

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? Y[I Ni] UrI N/AM (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ N[i] Ur-potentially adverse seismic conditions?

See response #1 Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ Nr-1 U[-D N/A[-]

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NDI Ur N/AD-I and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Masonry walls 63.4, 63.5, and 63.6 (C941Shl, El) are safety related, therefore seismically qualified and acceptable.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y[ NDJ U[] N/AD-

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ ND- U--

of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-OOOO1, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C53 of C413 AI'rACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 Status: YE NEI UI-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 016 Equipment ID No. MO1001-29A Equip. Class Motor-Operated& Solenoid-OperatedValves (08)

Equipment Description RHR A Loop LPCI Injection Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NEI UE adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

MO 1001-29A has both thermal and radiationshielding Area Walk-By is on A WC-0 11

,~C'i~iU J~N(kJ-Qr{LA Evaluated by: Gary Sweder Date: ZO / 7-1z-

'3 navidrmnII 52~J Li? (C /17 /112, EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C54 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 Status: YZ NrI UrL-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 016 Equipment ID No. MOIOOI-29A Equip. Class Motor-Operated& Solenoid-Operated Valves (08)

Equipment Description RHR A Loop LPCI Injection Photographs EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-O0001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page 055 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 4 Status: YZ NE] UEI]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 017 Equipment ID No. MO1001-34A Equip. Class' Motor-Operated& Solenoid-Operated Valves (08)

Equipment Description RHR Loop A Torus Return Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. 9 R oom, Area SE QD Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y[-- NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Inline component, no anchorage.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YE] NE] UE] N/AO

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YE] NE-] uE] N/AO oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the Y[E] N[-] U[] N/A[

anchors?

I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C56 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 Status: Y[ NFR-Ur]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 017 Equipment ID No. MO1001-34A Equip. Class Motor-Operated& Solenoid-OperatedValves (08)

Equipment Description RHR Loop A Torus Return

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? Y[-- NFi UiL N/AZ (Note: This question only applies ifthe item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ NEI U-I potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NFil UD N/A-]

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NEI ULI N/A--

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ Nil u[-] N/A[-]

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NEL ULI of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C57 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 Status: YN Ný UE-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 017 Equipment ID No. MO1001-34A Equip. Class Motor-Operated& Solenoid-OperatedValves (08)

Equipment Description RHR Loop A Torus Return Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y0 N[l U[-]

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

The paint is strippedaround the weld between the valve body and the piping. There is mild surface corrosionin the area, but this is not consideredan adverse seismic condition.

SWEL 1-017 is on AWC-007.

Evaluated by: David Small 2w~t4 Date: 10/09/2012 Halie Aroz 10/09/2012

-  %--," 0 L)

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C58 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 Status: YE N[-] U[-

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 017 Equipment ID No. MOIOOI-34A Equip. Class Motor-Operated& Solenoid-OperatedValves (08)

Equipment Description RHR Loop A Torus Retum Photographs EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-O0001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C59 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 5 Status: YN Nr-F Ur Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 018 Equipment ID No. MOIOOI-36A Equip. Class' Motor-Operated& Solenoid-Ogerated Valves (08)

Equipment Description RHR Loop A Torus Return Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. -1.5 Rc om, Area SE QD Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y[-] NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Inline component, no anchorage.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YE] NE- U[-] N/AO

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YE]- NE] Ur] N/A2 oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the Y[E] NEI U[- N/AZ anchors?

I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C60 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YZ NE] U--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 018 Equipment ID No. MO1001-36A Equip. Class Motor-Operated& Solenoid-OperatedValves (08)

Equipment Description RHR Loon A Torus Return

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YIO NI] U[i N/A[

(Note: This question only applies ifthe item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YE NEI U[I potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YEI NZ Ur- N/A[

The 1-1/2" rigid steel power conduit to Core Spray Valve MO 1400-3A is in contact with the motor operatorof MO 100 1-36A. The conduit appears slightly bent due to this contact. Due to the potential for adverse interaction during a seismic event, CR-PNP-2012-04442 was written to address the concem. WR 286594 has been initiated to reroute the conduit to provide clearancewith the motor. See attached photo.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ N[-] U-- N/A--

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ N[-] Ur-] N/AF-]

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YF- NZ Ur-1 of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C61 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YZ Nn Ur-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 018 Equipment ID No. MO1001-36A Equip. Class Motor-Operated& Solenoid-OperatedValves (08)

Equipment Description RHR Loop A Torus Return Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YED NEI U-j adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

The paint is stripped aroundthe welds between the valve body and the piping. There is mild surface corrosionin the area,but this is not consideredan adverse seismic condition.

Under the valve, two pins were found duct taped to a stanchion above a spring can. This was discussed with operationsand engineeringmanagement, and was determined to be an acceptable practice for holding the pins in place; therefore, it is not a seismic interaction or a housekeeping concern.

SWEL1-018 is on AWC-007.

Evaluated by: David Small 0 J/ I 'A Date: 10/09/2012 Halie Aroz 10/09/2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C62 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 5 Status: Y[ Nr I U--I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 018 Equipment ID No. MOIOOI-36A Equip. Class Motor-Operated& Solenoid-OperatedValves (08)

Equipment Description RHR Loop A Torus Return Photographs Note: Note:

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C63 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YN NR U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 018 Equipment ID No. MOIOOI-36A Equip. Class Motor-Operated& Solenoid-OperatedValves (08)

Equipment Description RHR Loop A Torus Return Note: MO1400-3A conduit in contact with the Note:

motor.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page 064 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 4 Status: YZ NF- Ur-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 020 Equipment ID No. MO1001-7A Equip. Class' Motor-Operated& Solenoid-Operated Valves (08)

Equipment Description RHR Pump P203A Suction Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. -17.5 Rc,om, Area SE QD Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE-] NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Inline component, no anchorage.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YE-- NEI ULI N/AO

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YEl NEl U[E N/AO oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YF] NE] U[-E N/AZ anchors?

I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page 065 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 Status: Y[ NE UEl Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 020 Equipment ID No. MO1001-7A Equip. Class Motor-Operated& Solenoid-Operated Valves (08)

Equipment Description RHR Pump P203A Suction

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? Y[E NE] UE-] N/A (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y[K NEI UEF potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NEi UE- N/AE[

Scaffold at base of valve is safety related per scaffold log 12-0 1, ECR 13360 and does not pose a seismic hazard.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NEl UE- NIAE and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NE-] U[E- N/AE-

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NE-] uE of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-OOOO1, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C66 of 0413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 Status: Y[ N["] Ul-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 020 Equipment ID No. MO1001-7A Equip. Class Motor-Operated& Solenoid-Operated Valves (08)

Equipment Description RHR Pump P203A Suction Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NEI uL adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Area walk-by is on AWC-032.

Evaluated by: Gary Sweder Date: 10-9-12

-- (,j -

Laura Macla v )AWCLOct-6YLCQ 10-9-12 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C67 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 Status: YZ NE] Ur Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 020 Equipment ID No. MO1001-7A Equip. Class Motor-Operated& Solenoid-OperatedValves (08)

Equipment Description RHR Pump P203A Suction Photographs EN-DC-1 68 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C68 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 4 Status: YZ Nr-] Ur-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 021 Equipment ID No. M01001-7C Equip. Classi Motor-Operated& Solenoid-OperatedValves (08)

Equipment Description RHR Pump P203C Suction Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. -17.5 R oom, Area SE QD Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE-- N[

of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Inline component, no anchorage.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Y--] NE] UEi N/AZ

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YEI NEI UEr N/A[

oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YE] NEI uEr N/AZ anchors?

I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment, EN-DC-1 68 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C69 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 Status: YM NEI UI-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 021 Equipment ID No. M01001-7C Equip. Class Motor-Operated & Solenoid-OperatedValves (08)

Equipment Description RHR Pump P203C Suction

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YI] NFI UF- N/AN (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YE NFI U-]

potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NEI U[-] N/Ar]

Scaffold at base of valve is safety related per scaffold log 12-01, ECR 13360 and does not pose a seismic hazard.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y[ NiE UI- N/A[-]

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YN NEII U[] N/A-]

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NiE UE[

of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-OOOO1, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C70 of 0413 A'RACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 Status: Y0 NEI U[-

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 021 Equipment ID No. M01001-7C Equip. Class Motor-Operated& Solenoid-OperatedValves (08)

Equipment Description RHR Pump P203C Suction Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NEI UL adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Area walk-by is on AWC-032.

Evaluated by: Garv Sweder Date: 10-9-12 Q

Laura Maclay WT' V.U01.. U Y Ii C1L(tA 10-9-12 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C71 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 Status: YZ NE] ULI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 021 Equipment ID No. M01001-7C Equip. Class Motor-Operated& Solenoid-OperatedValves (08)

Equipment Description RHR Pump P203C Suction Photographs EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C72 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 4 Status: YZ NF- UIZI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 022 Equipment ID No. E207A Equip. Class, Tanks and Heat Exchangers (21)

Equipment Description RHR A Loop Heat Exchanger Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. -17.5 Room, Area SE QD Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Although the component is anchored, due to the location in the overhead and lack of accessibilityto that area, this item is not considered for the 50% anchorage verification.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YZ NEI UE! N/AEJ Anchorage is visible from a distance below and to the side of the Heat Exchanger.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YZ NE- ULI N/AZ!

oxidation?

Anchorage from the component to the steel frame is in good condition.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YEI' NI- U-- N/AZ anchors?

Equipment is anchored to a steel frame which sits on embedded plates in the wall. Due to high location on the wall, this is not visible.

'Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C73 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 Status: YZ NM] U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 022 Equipment ID No. E207A Equip. Class Tanks and Heat Exchangers (21)

Equipment Description RHR A Loop Heat Exchanger

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE] NE] UEI N/AZ (Note: This question only applies ifthe item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Refer to response to question 1 above.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YN NE] UI-potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y[ NEI UE] N/A--

Component is covered in lead shielding. Scaffold at top of Heat Exchanger is safety relatedper scaffold log 12-0 1, ECR 13360 and does not pose a seismic hazard.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NE] uE] N/AE]

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NE] U[-] N/A[E]

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YN NE] uE-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C74 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 Status: YZ NM UM-I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 022 Equipment ID No. E207A Equip. Class Tanks and Heat Exchangers (21)

Equipment Description RHR A Loop Heat Exchanger Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YED NE] U[-E adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Area walk-by is on AWC-032.

Evaluated by: Gary Sweder Date: 10-9-12 p

Laura Maclay 40LAYYLcC 2 A 10-9-12 EN-DC-1 68 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C75 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 Status: YZ N[-] UD Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 022 Equipment ID No. E207A Equip. Class Tanks and Heat Exchangers (21)

Equipment Description RHR A Loop Heat Exchanger Photographs EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C76 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 4 Status: YZ NF UI-]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 024 Equipment ID No. M01201-5 Equip. Class, Motor-Operated& Solenoid-OperatedValves (08)

Equipment Description RWCU Suction Line Isolation Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. 51 R oom, Area RWCU HX Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YF- N of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

In-line component, no anchorage.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YI-- N[I U["] N/AO

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YE" NEI UEI N/AZ oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YEI NEl uLE- N/A[

anchors?

IEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C77 of 0413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 Status: YZ NF U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 024 Equipment ID No. M01201-5 Equip. Class Motor-Operated & Solenoid-OperatedValves (08)

Equipment Description RWCU Suction Line Isolation

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? Yr] NEi Ur] N/AN (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YN NE] U[-]

potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NEI UE] N/AE]

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YN NEI] uE] N/AE]

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Long term scaffolding,log 11-99, tag 12169 is erected in the room and is evaluated to show it does not pose an adverse seismic interaction.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NE] UE] N/AE]

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ N[-] U-]

of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C78 of C413 ATrACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 Status: YO N-Il UE-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 024 Equipment ID No. M01201-5 Equip. Class Motor-Operated& Solenoid-OperatedValves (08)

Equipment Description RWCU Suction Line Isolation Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ N[:]UE1 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Valve body is obstructed by shielding.

The Area Walk-By Checklist is AWC-028.

Evaluated by: Gary Sweder A A-, Date: I-)- -I1E David Small lof /2.

EN-DC-1 68 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C79 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 Status: Y[ NIjI Ur--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 024 Equipment ID No. M01201-5 Equip. Class Motor-Operated& Solenoid-OperatedValves (08)

Equipment Description RWCU Suction Line Isolation Photographs Note: Valve Identification EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page 080 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 1 of 5 Status: YZ NF-] U[

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 025 Equipment ID No. M01201-80 Equip. Class, Motor-Operated& Solenoid-Operated Valves (08)

Equipment Description RWCU Return Line Isolation Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. 51 Rcoom, Area RWCU HX Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE- NZ of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

In-line component, no anchorage

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YLI NEI Uil N/A]

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YEI- NE]l UEr N/AZ oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YEI- NEI urE- N/A; anchors?

I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C81 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 Status: Y[ NOIl U[I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 025 Equipment ID No. M01201-80 Equip. Class Motor-Operated&Solenoid-Operated Valves (08)

Equipment Description RWCU Return Line Isolation

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YI- NFI ULI N/AN (Note: This question only applies ifthe item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y[ NEi UI-potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y[ N[il Ur] N/Ar]

A ladder at the north end of the room could not be verified to be secure.

However, this is not deemed to pose an adverse seismic interaction due to the light weight of an aluminum ladder in comparison to the valve body.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y[E N[-] Ur] N/AE]

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Long term scaffolding, logs 11-99, 11-56, and 11-99 are erected and approved for use in the room and do not present a potentiallyadverse seismic interaction.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YO N[] UI-- N/ALE

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YO NEL UF-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-OOOO1, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C82 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YN NEIl UI-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 025 Equipment ID No. M01201-80 Equip. Class Motor-Operated& Solenoid-OperatedValves (08)

Equipment Description RWCU Return Line Isolation Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YU NEIUE1 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

The Area Walk-By Checklist is A WC-028.

Evaluated by: Gary Sweder ,A a...L4 L"-,4 "U, Date: /o-/?-(Z

'3 David Small David Smal

- ja 6-7 1112-EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C83 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YZ N[-] U--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 025 Equipment ID No. M01201-80 Equip. Class Motor-Operated& Solenoid-OperatedValves (08)

Equipment Description RWCU Return Line Isolation Photographs Note: Note:

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-OOOO1, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C84 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YZ NE U[D Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 025 Equipment ID No. M01201-80 Equip. Class Motor-Operated& Solenoid-OperatedValves (08)

Equipment Description RWCU Return Line Isolation Note: Ladder Note:

EN-DC-168 REV 0