05000282/FIN-2011003-13: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
| identified by = Licensee | | identified by = Licensee | ||
| Inspection procedure = | | Inspection procedure = | ||
| Inspector = J Jandovitz, M Mitchell, C Brown, M Phalen, K Stoedter, D Betancourt, J Corujo | | Inspector = J Jandovitz, M Mitchell, C Brown, M Phalen, K Stoedter, D Betancourt, J Corujo-Sandin, E Sanchez, N Feliz-Adorno, S Lynch, S Shah | ||
| CCA = N/A for ROP | | CCA = N/A for ROP | ||
| INPO aspect = | | INPO aspect = | ||
| description = Title 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B, Criterion XVII, Quality Assurance Records, requires, in part, that sufficient records be maintained to furnish evidence of activities affecting quality and that such records shall be identifiable and retrievable. Procedure FP-G-RM-01, Quality Assurance Records Control, Revision 14, established requirements for the classification and retention of records. This procedure also described that RM-0044, Records Retention Index, defined specific document types and retention periods for quality records. Revision 4 of RM-0044 designated engineering evaluations as permanent quality records with lifetime retention. Prior to the TI 2515/177 inspection, the licensee identified that they had not documented the results of engineering evaluations performed to review susceptible locations of gas accumulation in piping. Specifically, the licensee did not have quality records documenting the evaluation of gas susceptible locations that determined which locations required periodic monitoring. The licensee identified this issue on February 24, 2011, and captured the issue as CAP 1272406. The licensee re-performed the evaluation and documented it as EC 17990, Generic Letter 2008-01 Periodic Monitoring Engineering Evaluation. As result, the licensee identified new locations that required periodic monitoring. This issue impacted the Mitigating Systems Cornerstone. The finding screened as of very low safety significance (Green) because the finding was a design or qualification deficiency confirmed not to result in loss of operability in accordance with Phase 1 screening IMC 0609.04. Specifically, the licensee performed UT examinations at the new locations requiring monitoring and did not find adverse voids. | | description = Title 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B, Criterion XVII, Quality Assurance Records, requires, in part, that sufficient records be maintained to furnish evidence of activities affecting quality and that such records shall be identifiable and retrievable. Procedure FP-G-RM-01, Quality Assurance Records Control, Revision 14, established requirements for the classification and retention of records. This procedure also described that RM-0044, Records Retention Index, defined specific document types and retention periods for quality records. Revision 4 of RM-0044 designated engineering evaluations as permanent quality records with lifetime retention. Prior to the TI 2515/177 inspection, the licensee identified that they had not documented the results of engineering evaluations performed to review susceptible locations of gas accumulation in piping. Specifically, the licensee did not have quality records documenting the evaluation of gas susceptible locations that determined which locations required periodic monitoring. The licensee identified this issue on February 24, 2011, and captured the issue as CAP 1272406. The licensee re-performed the evaluation and documented it as EC 17990, Generic Letter 2008-01 Periodic Monitoring Engineering Evaluation. As result, the licensee identified new locations that required periodic monitoring. This issue impacted the Mitigating Systems Cornerstone. The finding screened as of very low safety significance (Green) because the finding was a design or qualification deficiency confirmed not to result in loss of operability in accordance with Phase 1 screening IMC 0609.04. Specifically, the licensee performed UT examinations at the new locations requiring monitoring and did not find adverse voids. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 10:42, 30 May 2018
| Site: | Prairie Island  |
|---|---|
| Report | IR 05000282/2011003 Section 4OA7 |
| Date counted | Jun 30, 2011 (2011Q2) |
| Type: | NCV: Green |
| cornerstone | Mitigating Systems |
| Identified by: | Licensee-identified |
| Inspection Procedure: | |
| Inspectors (proximate) | J Jandovitz M Mitchell C Brown M Phalen K Stoedter D Betancourt J Corujo-Sandin E Sanchez N Feliz-Adorno S Lynch S Shah |
| INPO aspect | |
| ' | |