ML12216A027: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 18: Line 18:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:From:Beltz, TerryTo:Wideman Steve GCc:Tsao, John; Burkhardt, Janet; Chen, Qiao-Lynn; wimuile@WCNOC.comSubject:Wolf Creek Generating Station - Acceptance Review re: Relief Request I3R-07 (TAC No. ME9078)Date:Friday, August 03, 2012 7:07:41 AM Dear Mr. Wideman:
{{#Wiki_filter:From:Beltz, TerryTo:Wideman Steve GCc:Tsao, John; Burkhardt, Janet; Chen, Qiao-Lynn; wimuile@WCNOC.com
 
==Subject:==
Wolf Creek Generating Station - Acceptance Review re: Relief Request I3R-07 (TAC No. ME9078)Date:Friday, August 03, 2012 7:07:41 AM  
 
==Dear Mr. Wideman:==
 
By letter dated July 2, 2012, (ADAMS Accession No. ML12193A559), the Wolf CreekNuclear Operating Corporation (WCNOC) requested relief from certain requirements of theASME Code, Code Case N-729-1, as conditioned in 10 CFR 50.55a, for examination ofreactor vessel head penetration welds at the Wolf Creek Generating Station.
By letter dated July 2, 2012, (ADAMS Accession No. ML12193A559), the Wolf CreekNuclear Operating Corporation (WCNOC) requested relief from certain requirements of theASME Code, Code Case N-729-1, as conditioned in 10 CFR 50.55a, for examination ofreactor vessel head penetration welds at the Wolf Creek Generating Station.
The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the final results of the NRC staff's acceptancereview of this request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there issufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete itsdetailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding theacceptability of the proposed change. The acceptance review is also intended to identifywhether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in itscharacterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.
The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the final results of the NRC staff's acceptancereview of this request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there issufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete itsdetailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding theacceptability of the proposed change. The acceptance review is also intended to identifywhether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in itscharacterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.

Revision as of 12:52, 5 April 2018

Wolf Creek - Acceptance Review Email, Relief Request I3R-07 from ASME Code Case N-7229 for Examination of Reactor Vessel Head Penetration Welds, for Remainder of Third 10-Year Inservice Inspection Interval (TAC No. ME9078)
ML12216A027
Person / Time
Site: Wolf Creek Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation icon.png
Issue date: 08/03/2012
From: Beltz T A
Plant Licensing Branch IV
To: Wideman S G
Wolf Creek
Beltz T A
References
TAC ME9078, N-7229
Download: ML12216A027 (1)


Text

From:Beltz, TerryTo:Wideman Steve GCc:Tsao, John; Burkhardt, Janet; Chen, Qiao-Lynn; wimuile@WCNOC.com

Subject:

Wolf Creek Generating Station - Acceptance Review re: Relief Request I3R-07 (TAC No. ME9078)Date:Friday, August 03, 2012 7:07:41 AM

Dear Mr. Wideman:

By letter dated July 2, 2012, (ADAMS Accession No. ML12193A559), the Wolf CreekNuclear Operating Corporation (WCNOC) requested relief from certain requirements of theASME Code, Code Case N-729-1, as conditioned in 10 CFR 50.55a, for examination ofreactor vessel head penetration welds at the Wolf Creek Generating Station.

The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the final results of the NRC staff's acceptancereview of this request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there issufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete itsdetailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding theacceptability of the proposed change. The acceptance review is also intended to identifywhether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in itscharacterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.

The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that there appears to besufficient technical information, both in scope and depth, to enable the staff to proceedwith its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding theacceptability of the LAR in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of publichealth and safety and the environment.

If additional information is needed for the staff to complete its technical review, you will beadvised by separate correspondence.

Should you have any questions regarding this review, please contact me at (301) 415-3049.

Sincerely, Terry A. Beltz, Senior Project ManagerPlant Licensing Branch III-1Division of Operating Reactor LicensingOffice of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (301) 415-3049Terry.Beltz@nrc.gov