ML20199G133: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| number = ML20199G133 | | number = ML20199G133 | ||
| issue date = 03/25/1985 | | issue date = 03/25/1985 | ||
| title = Responds to | | title = Responds to Re Inconsistencies Between Three Mechanical/Piping Ssers & Three Related Qa/Qc Ssers.Subj Matter Concerning AQ-7 Will Be Covered Under AQW-30 in Mech 2 | ||
| author name = Shao L | | author name = Shao L | ||
| author affiliation = NRC - COMANCHE PEAK PROJECT (TECHNICAL REVIEW TEAM) | | author affiliation = NRC - COMANCHE PEAK PROJECT (TECHNICAL REVIEW TEAM) | ||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
| case reference number = FOIA-85-59 | | case reference number = FOIA-85-59 | ||
| document report number = NUDOCS 8606250093 | | document report number = NUDOCS 8606250093 | ||
| title reference date = 03-08-1985 | |||
| package number = ML20197J178 | | package number = ML20197J178 | ||
| document type = INTERNAL OR EXTERNAL MEMORANDUM, MEMORANDUMS-CORRESPONDENCE | | document type = INTERNAL OR EXTERNAL MEMORANDUM, MEMORANDUMS-CORRESPONDENCE | ||
| Line 19: | Line 20: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:j | {{#Wiki_filter:j | ||
~ | |||
.e l | |||
/ | |||
es caro j | |||
3 | |||
o UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION | + | ||
o UNITED STATES GAL g | |||
8 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION o | |||
3 | |||
,E WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 | |||
\\*****$' | |||
[ | [ | ||
MAR 2 51985 i | |||
MAR 2 51985 i | q NOTE T0: | ||
q NOTE T0: | Joe Scinto FROM: | ||
Comanche Peak Technical Review Team | L. Shao, Group Leader, Civil / Mechanical Groups Comanche Peak Technical Review Team | ||
==SUBJECT:== | ==SUBJECT:== | ||
CONSISTENCY BETWEEN MECHANICAL AND QA/QC SSER i | CONSISTENCY BETWEEN MECHANICAL AND QA/QC SSER i | ||
4 | 4 | ||
) | ) | ||
In your note to me and Herb Livermore on 3/8/85, you pointed out some inconsistencies between three Mechanical / Piping SSERs and three related | |||
{ | { | ||
QA/QC SSERs. The following is our response: | |||
1. | |||
Mech 2 (AQW 30) vs QA/QC AQ 7 5 | |||
After discussion with QA/QC, we both concluded that the subject matter related to AQ-7 will be covered under AQW-30 in Mech 2. | After discussion with QA/QC, we both concluded that the subject matter related to AQ-7 will be covered under AQW-30 in Mech 2. | ||
2. | |||
Mech 43 vs QA/QC 8 4 | |||
J | The subject matter on liner plate has been discussed and resolved in j | ||
[ | such a way that we refer all QA/QC aspects to QA/QC 8 and they refer a | ||
1 h | all mechanical / piping aspects to Mech 43. As for what kind of picture to represent TRT as a whole, I think it has to be decided by Noonan. | ||
( | 3. | ||
Mech 10 vs QA/QC AQ 61 We found that these two SSERs do not address the same subject matter. | |||
J Mech 10 relates to a gouge in pipe and QA/QC AQ 61 relates to gouges | |||
[ | |||
in a structure member. | |||
They even have different allegers. | |||
1 h | |||
Dr. Hou in our Group has discussed with Herb Livermore and Herb agreed with | |||
( | |||
above resolutions. | |||
k t | k t | ||
L. C. Shao, <roup Leader Civil / Mechanical Groups Comanche Peak Technical Review Team cc: | L. C. Shao, <roup Leader Civil / Mechanical Groups Comanche Peak Technical Review Team | ||
)!. | |||
6 | cc: | ||
D. Eisenhut V. Noonon i | |||
laulam m 6 | |||
I | S. | ||
ou | |||
-R. C. Tang P. Chen kN hofj3 860611 c r GARDE 85-59 PDR I | |||
I.- % - | |||
.}} | |||
Latest revision as of 07:37, 10 December 2024
| ML20199G133 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Comanche Peak, 05000000 |
| Issue date: | 03/25/1985 |
| From: | Shao L NRC - COMANCHE PEAK PROJECT (TECHNICAL REVIEW TEAM) |
| To: | Scinto J NRC |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20197J178 | List:
|
| References | |
| FOIA-85-59 NUDOCS 8606250093 | |
| Download: ML20199G133 (1) | |
Text
j
~
.e l
/
es caro j
3
+
o UNITED STATES GAL g
8 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION o
3
,E WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555
\\*****$'
[
MAR 2 51985 i
q NOTE T0:
Joe Scinto FROM:
L. Shao, Group Leader, Civil / Mechanical Groups Comanche Peak Technical Review Team
SUBJECT:
CONSISTENCY BETWEEN MECHANICAL AND QA/QC SSER i
4
)
In your note to me and Herb Livermore on 3/8/85, you pointed out some inconsistencies between three Mechanical / Piping SSERs and three related
{
QA/QC SSERs. The following is our response:
1.
Mech 2 (AQW 30) vs QA/QC AQ 7 5
After discussion with QA/QC, we both concluded that the subject matter related to AQ-7 will be covered under AQW-30 in Mech 2.
2.
Mech 43 vs QA/QC 8 4
The subject matter on liner plate has been discussed and resolved in j
such a way that we refer all QA/QC aspects to QA/QC 8 and they refer a
all mechanical / piping aspects to Mech 43. As for what kind of picture to represent TRT as a whole, I think it has to be decided by Noonan.
3.
Mech 10 vs QA/QC AQ 61 We found that these two SSERs do not address the same subject matter.
J Mech 10 relates to a gouge in pipe and QA/QC AQ 61 relates to gouges
[
in a structure member.
They even have different allegers.
1 h
Dr. Hou in our Group has discussed with Herb Livermore and Herb agreed with
(
above resolutions.
k t
L. C. Shao, <roup Leader Civil / Mechanical Groups Comanche Peak Technical Review Team
)!.
cc:
D. Eisenhut V. Noonon i
laulam m 6
S.
ou
-R. C. Tang P. Chen kN hofj3 860611 c r GARDE 85-59 PDR I
I.- % -
.