ML20062M782: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot insert)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 25: Line 25:
==Dear Mr. Denton:==
==Dear Mr. Denton:==


In the Matter of                                )        Docket Nos. 50-327 Tennessee Valley Authority                      )                    50-328 In accordance with 10 CFR Pa: t 50.59, we are enclosing 40 copies of a revised requested amendment to the operating licenses DPR-77 and DPR-79 for a change to the Sequoyah Nuclear Plant units 1 and 2 technical specifications (Enclosure 1). The proposed amendment requests a change        in Table 4.3-9 to incorporate downscale failure alarms and a change in the surveillance requirements for ice condenser doors. The justifications to support the proposad changes are provided in Enclosure 2. This request supersedes sqy previous request submitted by letter dated July 29, 1982 from me to you.
In the Matter of                                )        Docket Nos. 50-327 Tennessee Valley Authority                      )                    50-328 In accordance with 10 CFR Pa: t 50.59, we are enclosing 40 copies of a revised requested amendment to the operating licenses DPR-77 and DPR-79 for a change to the Sequoyah Nuclear Plant units 1 and 2 technical specifications (Enclosure 1). The proposed amendment requests a change        in Table 4.3-9 to incorporate downscale failure alarms and a change in the surveillance requirements for ice condenser doors. The justifications to support the proposad changes are provided in Enclosure 2. This request supersedes sqy previous request submitted by {{letter dated|date=July 29, 1982|text=letter dated July 29, 1982}} from me to you.
In accordance with the provisions of 10 CFR Part 170.22, we have determined the proposed amendment to be Class III for unit 1 and Class I for unit 2.
In accordance with the provisions of 10 CFR Part 170.22, we have determined the proposed amendment to be Class III for unit 1 and Class I for unit 2.
This classification is based on the fact that the amendment involves a single safety issue and an administrative change and involves a second essentially identical unit at the same site. The remittance of $4,400 is being wired to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Attention: Licensing Fee Management Branch.
This classification is based on the fact that the amendment involves a single safety issue and an administrative change and involves a second essentially identical unit at the same site. The remittance of $4,400 is being wired to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Attention: Licensing Fee Management Branch.

Latest revision as of 04:57, 1 June 2023

Application to Amend Licenses DPR-77 & DPR-79,changing Tech Spec Table 4.3-9 to Incorporate Downscale Failure Alarms & Modifying Surveillance Requirements for Ice Condenser Doors
ML20062M782
Person / Time
Site: Sequoyah  Tennessee Valley Authority icon.png
Issue date: 08/12/1982
From: Mills L
TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY
To: Harold Denton
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML20062M787 List:
References
NUDOCS 8208200207
Download: ML20062M782 (2)
v • d • e


Text

_ _.

/

. 7 TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY CH ATTANOOGA. TENNESSEE 374ol 400 Chestnut Street Tower II August 12, 1982 TVA-SQN-TS-33 R1 Mr. Harold R. Denton, Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555

Dear Mr. Denton:

In the Matter of ) Docket Nos. 50-327 Tennessee Valley Authority ) 50-328 In accordance with 10 CFR Pa: t 50.59, we are enclosing 40 copies of a revised requested amendment to the operating licenses DPR-77 and DPR-79 for a change to the Sequoyah Nuclear Plant units 1 and 2 technical specifications (Enclosure 1). The proposed amendment requests a change in Table 4.3-9 to incorporate downscale failure alarms and a change in the surveillance requirements for ice condenser doors. The justifications to support the proposad changes are provided in Enclosure 2. This request supersedes sqy previous request submitted by letter dated July 29, 1982 from me to you.

In accordance with the provisions of 10 CFR Part 170.22, we have determined the proposed amendment to be Class III for unit 1 and Class I for unit 2.

This classification is based on the fact that the amendment involves a single safety issue and an administrative change and involves a second essentially identical unit at the same site. The remittance of $4,400 is being wired to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Attention: Licensing Fee Management Branch.

Very truly yours, TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY L. M. Mills, Manager

'/ Nuclear Licensing Sworn 'to d subscr ed before me 1 this .' day of '

982 O}

. Notary.Public g My Constission- Expires / "

Enclosures (40) cc: See page 2

!"208200207 820812 PDR ADOCK 05000327 P PDR An Equal Opportunity Employer

,, .o 2-Mr. Harold R. Denton, Director August 12, 1982 00: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region II Attn: Mr. James P. O'Reilly,' Regional Administrator 101 Marietta Street, Suite 3100 Atlanta, Georgia 30303 t

(

I i

J l

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20062M782&oldid=3552300"