ML20199G133

Responds to Re Inconsistencies Between Three Mechanical/Piping Ssers & Three Related Qa/Qc Ssers.Subj Matter Concerning AQ-7 Will Be Covered Under AQW-30 in Mech 2

ML20199G133
Person / Time
Site:	Comanche Peak, 05000000
Issue date:	03/25/1985
From:	Shao L NRC - COMANCHE PEAK PROJECT (TECHNICAL REVIEW TEAM)
To:	Scinto J NRC
Shared Package
ML20197J178	List: IR 05000445/1985009 ML20197J173 ML20197J273 ML20197J296 ML20199G064 ML20199G070 ML20199G083 ML20199G092 ML20199G099 ML20199G107 ML20199G116 ML20199G119 ML20199G124 ML20199G133 ML20199G146 ML20199G154 ML20199G163 ML20199G179 ML20199G212 ML20199G284 ML20199G292 ML20199G298 ML20199G306 ML20199G318 ML20199G331 ML20199G343 ML20199G352 ML20199G363 ML20199G383 ML20199G391 ML20199G402 ML20199G420 ML20199G432 ML20199G442 ML20199G453 ML20199G464 ML20199G575 ML20199G614 ML20199G620 ML20199G624 ML20199G630 ML20199G635 ML20199G641 ML20199G645 ML20199G649 ML20199G655 ML20199G661 ML20199G670 ML20199G675 ML20199G681 ... further results
References
FOIA-85-59 NUDOCS 8606250093
Download: ML20199G133 (1)

Text

j

~

. .e lj *. .. es caro

/

+ o 3

8 g

o UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION GAL -

. 3 ,E WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555

[

\*****$' .

MAR 2 51985 i  :

q NOTE T0: Joe Scinto FROM: L. Shao, Group Leader, Civil / Mechanical Groups -

Comanche Peak Technical Review Team

SUBJECT:

CONSISTENCY BETWEEN MECHANICAL AND QA/QC SSER i

4

) In your note to me and Herb Livermore on 3/8/85, you pointed out some

inconsistencies between three Mechanical / Piping SSERs and three related

{ QA/QC SSERs. The following is our response:

1. Mech 2 (AQW 30) vs QA/QC AQ 7 5

After discussion with QA/QC, we both concluded that the subject matter related to AQ-7 will be covered under AQW-30 in Mech 2.

2. Mech 43 vs QA/QC 8 4 The subject matter on liner plate has been discussed and resolved in j such a way that we refer all QA/QC aspects to QA/QC 8 and they refer a all mechanical / piping aspects to Mech 43. As for what kind of picture to represent TRT as a whole, I think it has to be decided by Noonan.

3. Mech 10 vs QA/QC AQ 61 We found that these two SSERs do not address the same subject matter.

J Mech 10 relates to a gouge in pipe and QA/QC AQ 61 relates to gouges

[ in a structure member. They even have different allegers.

1 h Dr. Hou in our Group has discussed with Herb Livermore and Herb agreed with

( above resolutions.

k t

L. C. Shao, <roup Leader Civil / Mechanical Groups Comanche Peak Technical Review Team cc: D. Eisenhut

)!. V. Noonon i

6 -

laulam S. ou m

-R. C. Tang P. Chen c r kN hofj3 860611 GARDE 85-59 PDR I -

I _ .- % - -

__ ._ _._ __