ML20067C964: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot insert)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
Line 18: Line 18:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:}}
{{#Wiki_filter:4~    -o                                                                                                j
  .m    .
flukc Iwn Comiiny                                                      LIStraen          l
                %Icar 1%hution ikpt                                                      li;e Prni< trot l'O hur lie:                                                            h icar Operatwn<
rhurior:e \ r 3;' lit lini                                              iMs ti?]pil DUKE POWl?R February 5, 1991                                                                        )
I 1
U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission                                                      l ATTN:      Document Control Desk                                                        !
Washington, D. C.        20555
                                                                                                            )
 
==Subject:==
Catawba Nuclear Station, Units 1 and 2                                          i Lockets No. 50-413 and 50-414                                            l NkC Inspection Report Nos. 50-413 and 30-414/90-06 H. B. Tucker's letter dated April 26, 1990 transmitted Duke's response to a Notice of Violation (413/90-06-02). This letter contained a planned corrective action to initiate a change to the Technical Specification by February 23, 1991. This change would revise two Technical Specification instrumentation setpoints and clarify the action to be taken when a setpoint is found to be between the Allowable Value and the Trip Setpoint Value.
The proposed Technical Specification changes are not necessary for continued plant operation and are only enhancements to the existing Technical Specifications. Procedural changes have ensured compliance with the existing Technical Specifications. Therefore, it is requested that the Technical Specification changes committed to in the April 26, 1990 response be du eted. This deletion will provide the station the flexibility to assign an appropriate priority to these Technical Specification changes.
Very truly yours, b.
Fi, 3. Tuckman, Vice president Nuclear-Operations CRL/16 9102120271 910205 PDR
                                                                                      / i O ADOCK 05000413                                                          '
_P                        PDR e                                                                                                        .
 
r-o-  .
U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission February 5, 1991 Page 2 xc: Mr. S. D. Ebneter Regional Administrator, Region 11 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Coinmission 101 Marietta Street, NW, Suite 2900 Atlanta, Georgia _30323 Mr. R. E. Martin Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulations U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission One White flint North, Mail Stop 9H3 Washington, D.- C. 205S5 Mr. W. T. Orders NRC Resident Inspector Catawba Nuclear Station i
1 l
l l
i l
l E
I
  ;}}

Revision as of 11:33, 6 September 2020

Requests Deletion of Tech Spec Changes from 900426 Response to Insp Repts 50-413/90-06 & 50-414/90-06.TS Changes Unnecessary for Continued Operation & Only Enhance Existing Specs
ML20067C964
Person / Time
Site: Catawba  Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 02/05/1991
From: Tuckman M
DUKE POWER CO.
To:
NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
References
NUDOCS 9102120271
Download: ML20067C964 (2)
v • d • e


Text

4~ -o j

.m .

flukc Iwn Comiiny LIStraen l

%Icar 1%hution ikpt li;e Prni< trot l'O hur lie: h icar Operatwn<

rhurior:e \ r 3;' lit lini iMs ti?]pil DUKE POWl?R February 5, 1991 )

I 1

U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission l ATTN: Document Control Desk  !

Washington, D. C. 20555

)

Subject:

Catawba Nuclear Station, Units 1 and 2 i Lockets No. 50-413 and 50-414 l NkC Inspection Report Nos. 50-413 and 30-414/90-06 H. B. Tucker's letter dated April 26, 1990 transmitted Duke's response to a Notice of Violation (413/90-06-02). This letter contained a planned corrective action to initiate a change to the Technical Specification by February 23, 1991. This change would revise two Technical Specification instrumentation setpoints and clarify the action to be taken when a setpoint is found to be between the Allowable Value and the Trip Setpoint Value.

The proposed Technical Specification changes are not necessary for continued plant operation and are only enhancements to the existing Technical Specifications. Procedural changes have ensured compliance with the existing Technical Specifications. Therefore, it is requested that the Technical Specification changes committed to in the April 26, 1990 response be du eted. This deletion will provide the station the flexibility to assign an appropriate priority to these Technical Specification changes.

Very truly yours, b.

Fi, 3. Tuckman, Vice president Nuclear-Operations CRL/16 9102120271 910205 PDR

/ i O ADOCK 05000413 '

_P PDR e .

r-o- .

U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission February 5, 1991 Page 2 xc: Mr. S. D. Ebneter Regional Administrator, Region 11 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Coinmission 101 Marietta Street, NW, Suite 2900 Atlanta, Georgia _30323 Mr. R. E. Martin Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulations U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission One White flint North, Mail Stop 9H3 Washington, D.- C. 205S5 Mr. W. T. Orders NRC Resident Inspector Catawba Nuclear Station i

1 l

l l

i l

l E

I

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20067C964&oldid=2942400"