ML092820239: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
| number = ML092820239
| number = ML092820239
| issue date = 10/09/2009
| issue date = 10/09/2009
| title = Acceptance Review Email License Amendment Request for Editorial Changes (TAC Nos ME2229 and ME2230)
| title = Acceptance Review Email License Amendment Request for Editorial Changes
| author name = Ennis R
| author name = Ennis R
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLI-2
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLI-2
Line 18: Line 18:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:From: Ennis, Rick Sent: Friday, October 09, 2009 11:19 AM To: Jeff Keenan Cc: Feintuch, Karl; Lingam, Siva; Paul Duke  
{{#Wiki_filter:From:                     Ennis, Rick Sent:                     Friday, October 09, 2009 11:19 AM To:                       Jeff Keenan Cc:                       Feintuch, Karl; Lingam, Siva; Paul Duke


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Acceptance Review for TACs ME2229 & ME2230 - Salem Units 1 and 2 - License Amendment Request for Editorial Changes Jeff, By letter dated September 14, 2009 (ADAMS Accession No. ML092680244), PSEG Nuclear LLC submitted a license amendment request for Salem Nuclear Generating Station, Unit Nos. 1 and 2 (Salem). The proposed amendment would correct editorial items in the Technical Specifications (TSs) and Facility Operating Licenses for Salem Unit Nos. 1 and 2. The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff
Acceptance Review for TACs ME2229 & ME2230 - Salem Units 1 and 2 -
=s acceptance review of this amendment request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.  
License Amendment Request for Editorial Changes
 
: Jeff, By letter dated September 14, 2009 (ADAMS Accession No. ML092680244), PSEG Nuclear LLC submitted a license amendment request for Salem Nuclear Generating Station, Unit Nos. 1 and 2 (Salem). The proposed amendment would correct editorial items in the Technical Specifications (TSs) and Facility Operating Licenses for Salem Unit Nos. 1 and 2. The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff=s acceptance review of this amendment request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.
Consistent with Section 50.90 of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), an amendment to the license (including the TSs) must fully describe the changes requested, and following as far as applicable, the form prescribed for original applications. Section 50.34 of 10 CFR addresses the content of technical information required. This section stipulates that the submittal address the design and operating characteristics, unusual or novel design features, and principal safety considerations.
Consistent with Section 50.90 of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), an amendment to the license (including the TSs) must fully describe the changes requested, and following as far as applicable, the form prescribed for original applications. Section 50.34 of 10 CFR addresses the content of technical information required. This section stipulates that the submittal address the design and operating characteristics, unusual or novel design features, and principal safety considerations.
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the staff to proceed with its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment request in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staff's ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. You will be advised of any further information needed to support the NRC staff's detailed technical review by separate correspondence.  
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the staff to proceed with its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment request in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. You will be advised of any further information needed to support the NRC staffs detailed technical review by separate correspondence.
 
If you have any questions, please contact me at (301) 415-1420.
If you have any questions, please contact me at (301) 415-1420.
Richard B. Ennis, Senior Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch I-2 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation E-mail Properties Mail Envelope Properties (9E28710E0B702149AEC663972863644016EA08B2)  
Richard B. Ennis, Senior Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch I-2 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation E-mail Properties Mail Envelope Properties (9E28710E0B702149AEC663972863644016EA08B2)


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Acceptance Review for TACs ME2229 & ME2230 - Salem Units 1 and 2 -
Acceptance Review for TACs ME2229 & ME2230 - Salem Units 1 and 2 -
License Amendment Request for Editorial Changes Sent Date:        10/09/2009 11:19:20 AM Received Date:        10/09/2009 11:19:20 AM From:                Ennis, Rick


Created By:         Rick.Ennis@nrc.gov  
License Amendment Request for Editorial Changes Sent Date:      10/09/2009 11:19:20 AM Received Date:      10/09/2009 11:19:20 AM From:            Ennis, Rick Created By:       Rick.Ennis@nrc.gov Recipients:
 
Recipients:
Jeff.Keenan@pseg.com (Jeff Keenan)
Jeff.Keenan@pseg.com (Jeff Keenan)
Tracking Status: None  
Tracking Status: None Karl.Feintuch@nrc.gov (Feintuch, Karl)
 
Tracking Status: None Siva.Lingam@nrc.gov (Lingam, Siva)
Karl.Feintuch@nrc.gov (Feintuch, Karl)                 Tracking Status: None Siva.Lingam@nrc.gov (Lingam, Siva)
Tracking Status: None Paul.Duke@pseg.com (Paul Duke)
Tracking Status: None Paul.Duke@pseg.com (Paul Duke)
Tracking Status: None  
Tracking Status: None Post Office:
 
HQCLSTR01.nrc.gov Files         Size     Date & Time MESSAGE         14045       10/09/2009 Options Expiration Date:
Post Office:
Priority:               olImportanceNormal ReplyRequested:        False Return Notification:     False Sensitivity:     olNormal Recipients received:}}
HQCLSTR01.nrc.gov  
 
Files               Size       Date & Time  
 
MESSAGE       14045       10/09/2009  
 
Options Expiration Date:
Priority:                       olImportanceNormal ReplyRequested:        False Return Notification:       False  
 
Sensitivity:         olNormal Recipients received:}}

Latest revision as of 22:22, 21 March 2020

Acceptance Review Email License Amendment Request for Editorial Changes
ML092820239
Person / Time
Site: Salem  PSEG icon.png
Issue date: 10/09/2009
From: Richard Ennis
Plant Licensing Branch 1
To: Keenan J
Public Service Enterprise Group
ENNIS R, NRR/DLPM,415-1453
References
TAC ME2229, TAC ME2230
Download: ML092820239 (2)
v • d • e


Text

From: Ennis, Rick Sent: Friday, October 09, 2009 11:19 AM To: Jeff Keenan Cc: Feintuch, Karl; Lingam, Siva; Paul Duke

Subject:

Acceptance Review for TACs ME2229 & ME2230 - Salem Units 1 and 2 -

License Amendment Request for Editorial Changes

Jeff, By letter dated September 14, 2009 (ADAMS Accession No. ML092680244), PSEG Nuclear LLC submitted a license amendment request for Salem Nuclear Generating Station, Unit Nos. 1 and 2 (Salem). The proposed amendment would correct editorial items in the Technical Specifications (TSs) and Facility Operating Licenses for Salem Unit Nos. 1 and 2. The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff=s acceptance review of this amendment request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.

Consistent with Section 50.90 of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), an amendment to the license (including the TSs) must fully describe the changes requested, and following as far as applicable, the form prescribed for original applications. Section 50.34 of 10 CFR addresses the content of technical information required. This section stipulates that the submittal address the design and operating characteristics, unusual or novel design features, and principal safety considerations.

The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the staff to proceed with its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment request in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. You will be advised of any further information needed to support the NRC staffs detailed technical review by separate correspondence.

If you have any questions, please contact me at (301) 415-1420.

Richard B. Ennis, Senior Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch I-2 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation E-mail Properties Mail Envelope Properties (9E28710E0B702149AEC663972863644016EA08B2)

Subject:

Acceptance Review for TACs ME2229 & ME2230 - Salem Units 1 and 2 -

License Amendment Request for Editorial Changes Sent Date: 10/09/2009 11:19:20 AM Received Date: 10/09/2009 11:19:20 AM From: Ennis, Rick Created By: Rick.Ennis@nrc.gov Recipients:

Jeff.Keenan@pseg.com (Jeff Keenan)

Tracking Status: None Karl.Feintuch@nrc.gov (Feintuch, Karl)

Tracking Status: None Siva.Lingam@nrc.gov (Lingam, Siva)

Tracking Status: None Paul.Duke@pseg.com (Paul Duke)

Tracking Status: None Post Office:

HQCLSTR01.nrc.gov Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 14045 10/09/2009 Options Expiration Date:

Priority: olImportanceNormal ReplyRequested: False Return Notification: False Sensitivity: olNormal Recipients received:

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML092820239&oldid=2652008"