ML17122A249

Submittal of 2016 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report

ML17122A249
Person / Time
Site:	Salem, Hope Creek
Issue date:	04/26/2017
From:	Casulli E, Grover F Public Service Enterprise Group
To:	Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
LR-N 17-0089
Download: ML17122A249 (145)

Text

PSEG Nuclear LLC

) P.O. Box 236, Hancocks Bridge, New Jersey 08038-0236 0PSEG Nuclear LLC Technical Specification Section 6.9.1.7 (Salem)

Technical Specification Section 6.9.1.6 (Hope Creek)

LR-N 17-0089 APR 2 6 2017 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Document Control Desk Washington DC 20555-001 Salem Nuclear Generating Station, Unit Nos. 1 and 2 Renewed Facility Operating License Nos. DPR-70 and DPR-75 NRC Docket Nos. 50-272 and 50-311 Hope Creek Generating Station Renewed Facility Operating License No. NPF-57 Docket No. 50-354

Subject:

2016 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report As required by Section 6.9.1.7 of Appendix A to Renewed Facility Operating Licenses DPR-70 and DPR-75 for Salem Generating Station Unit Nos. 1 and 2, and Section 6.9.1.6 of Appendix A to Renewed Facility Operating License NPF-57 for Hope Creek Generating Station, PSEG Nuclear hereby transmits one copy of the combined 2016 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report (Enclosure). This report summarizes the results of the radiological environmental surveillance program for 2016 in the vicinity of the Salem and Hope Creek Generating Stations. The result of this program for 2016 was specifically compared to the result of the pre-operational program.

There are no regulatory commitments contained in this letter.

If you have any questions or comments on this transmittal, please contact Ms. Alison Kraus at (856) 339-7900.

n eh Grover Edward T. Casulli lant Manager Plant Manager Salem Generating Station Hope Creek Generating Station ko

Enclosure:

2016 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report

Technical Specification Section 6.9.1. 7 (Salem)

Technical Specification Section 6.9.1.6 (Hope Creek)

LR-N17-0089 Page 2 cc: Mr. Daniel Dorman, Regional Administrator - NRC Region 1 Ms. Carleen Parker, Project Manager - USNRC Mr. Patrick Finney, USNRC Senior Resident Inspector - Salem Mr. Justin Hawkins, USNRC Senior Resident Inspector - Hope Creek Mr. Patrick Mulligan, Manager IV, NJBNE Mr. Lee Marabella, Corporate Commitment Tracking Coordinator Mr. Thomas Cachaza, Salem Commitment Tracking Coordinator Mr. Thomas MacEwen, Hope Creek Commitment Tracking Coordinator

/

Technical Specification Section 6.9.1.9 (Salem)

Technical Specification Section 6.9.1. 7 (Hope Creek)

LR-N 17-0089 Enclosure PSEG Nuclear LLC Salem and Hope Creek Generating Stations 2016 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report

LS-AA-117-1002 Revision 5 Page 1 of 6 TYPICAL LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS CORRESPONDENCE CONCURRENCE FORM Station(s): ---=S=a"-'le"'""m'-"/-=--H=o=p=e--=C'-'-re=e=k"'--------- Correspondence No.: LR-N17-0089 Subject/Document: 2016 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report Document Due Date: ---=-0~4/=2~7/=2=0~17'--_ Regulatory Driven Due Date: @ I NO Document Prepared by: -~A~l_,_ys~s~e_O~c=h~o=a'--_ Extension: -~2~74~2'----

If Routine NRC report, then document SAP recurring task or generate notification: _ _

Required Review and Disciplines Assigned by: ~Ja=m~es~M=a=ll=on~_~/___D~ire=c~to=r~,~R=e"""'g~.C~o=m~pl=ia~n~ce Title Type of Review Required: D Technical Verification Team Review (Reference LS-AA-117) ',~Jlndividual or Series Review D No Technical Review Disciplines Required:

D Maintenance ~Jadiation Protection Chemistry ... D.}raining D Operations ITEngineering - l&C Radwaste ** Reg Assurance I Licensing D Rx Engineering D Design Engineering D Engr - Mech Systems :O:Progra~s Engineering D Nuclear Fuels D Work Management D Engr - Elect Systems ~bther: Environmental Affairs NOTE The following signatures indicate and affirm that technical inputs for this regulatory correspondence are technically correct, complete, and accurate in all material respects.

• Print Name:/ Signatur~. *. Discipline**

Preparer Peer Reviewer Peer Reviewer

-Jes~ A.//fr CFAM - Chemistry-- f'v/'4-Manager- Env. Affairs Manager - HC Chemistry Manager- Salem Chemistry Manager - HC Rad Pro Manager - Salem Rad Pro Required Reviews and Signatures (check as appropriate):

D Station Qualified Review Required: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Date: _ __

D Corporate Licensing Concurrence Required: Date: _ __

1'1ii' Station Regulatory Assurance Concurrence Required: . /'ji~ Date: t1/2 c:I/ /

ames Mallon/ Dir. Site Reg. Complian~

0 PORC Approval Required: PORC Meeting No. _ _ _ _ _ PORC Chair_ _ _ _ _ _ _ __

t!!]P1ant Manager Approval Required: Ken Grover and Ed Casulli/ On Letter Date: _ __

D Site Vice President Approval Required: Date: _ __

LS-AA-117-1002 Revision 5 Page 2 of 6 Quality Review Checklist

1. The following checklists should be selected based on the type of document being submitted (LER, LAR or other NRC correspondence)

a. Correspondence Checklist- Page 3

b. LAR - Page 4

c. LER - Pages 5 and 6

2. Only one checklist should be used for each document, the individual assigned the responsibility for the letter should fill out the checklist.

3. The peer reviewer can use the following checklists as a guide.

LS-AA-117-1002 Revision 5 Page 3 of 6 Correspondence Quality Checklist Letter Number: LR-N17-0087 Format Initials 0 Cover letter formatted IAW LS-AA-117-1003 +t JU--

0 Letter number on all pages, as appropriate ~ /1-0 Pagination and page count tr /?A-0 Attachments and Enclosures referenced to the letter 'f(U / ~

0 CC and/or BC list are complete and accurate IA: D 7'-

0 Enclosures or attachments are readable kr I'-

0 Special requirements noted such as Public Withholding with pages marked as appropriate 1\J t '(1-0 Correct Addressee 17\Q '?-

0 Spelling and Grammar ckf 1'---

0 Docket and License Numbers as required h; "17--

0 Margins consistent ke. 7 0 Fonts consistent *10 -r1"-'

Content ' Initials 0 Summary paragraph as introduction, which clearly states purpose of correspondence (what we wish to accomplish or what we need from addressee) -kr: 'J"L-0 Appropriate regulatory references included ~ 7"'

~*

0 Body text flows, has a logical sequence and supports the conclusions -rv..

0 Follows any regulatory guidance regarding content ~D T'-

0 Extraneous material is not included i~ Ti-,

0 References cited as appropriate and necessary fs75' ....,.,,.._

0 Conclusion states who has the action and what the action is including due dates as appropriate ~ "'ft-.

0 PSEG contact provided for any follow-up kt' ?--

0 Paragraph structure complete and consistent ¥ ~

0 Affidavit or "affirmation" as required }J\l1 -r/ A-0 Statements supporting withholding included as appropriate tJ\-Pl 0 Summary of Commitments included as appropriate. (ref: LS-AA-117-1003) rf$£ yv-Transmission Initials 0 Letter signed by appropriate individual 0 Envelope(s) correctly addressed.

0 SGI envelopes properly protected. I I

0 Document page checked I 0 Document transmitted to Records Management .lf'J't.

0 PDF File of signed and dated letter created for NRC electronic submission .~ A¥7...

0 OCR and Preflight PDF file j~

0 Submit document to NRC and retain electronic submittal confirmation ~ .p....n.

0 Traveler (per LS-AA-117-1002) is complete (including appropriate discipline signatures) 0 Commitments entered into Tracking Database 0 Correspondence log updated ~~

0 Distribution timely .J~/V

LS-AA-117-1002 Revision 5 Page 4 of 6 License Amendments Requests Quality Checklist NIA Letter Number: I LAR Number:

Format Initials 0 Format IAW LS-AA-101-1000 0 Marked up pages are clear and legible Content Initials 0 50.92 Discussion sections accurately answers the question 0 Marked-up pages agree with descriptions in pleading.

Miscellaneous Initials 0 Marked up pages reflect current effective page.

0 LAR number is appropriate and obtained from LAR log 0 The effects of other pending changes have been evaluated for the potential to affect this application 0 If included, Camera Ready pages are based on current effective pages. Be alert for pages that are impacted by different simultaneous amendments 0 Traveler includes all relevant reviewers.(TVT, SOR and PORC) 0 Traveler includes ALL impacted departments 0 Traveler completed 0 Distribution timely 0 Commitments appropriately entered into SAP 0 Correspondence log updated .

Transmission Initials 0 Letter signed by appropriate individual 0 Envelope(s) correctly addressed 0 Document page checked 0 Document transmitted to Records Management 0 PDF File of signed and dated letter created for NRC electronic submission 0 OCR and Preflight PDF file 0 Submit document to NRC and retain electronic submittal confirmation.

0 Traveler (per LS-AA-117-1002) is complete (including appropriate discipline signatures) 0 Commitments entered into Tracking Database 0 Correspondence log updated 0 Distribution timely

LS-AA-117-1002 Revision 5 Page 5 of 6 LER Quality Checklist Letter Number: LER Number:

Content Initials o A brief abstract describing the major occurrences during the event, including all component or system failures that contributed to the event and significant corrective action taken or planned to prevent recurrence (NOTE: Energy Industry Identification System (EllS) codes are not be used in abstract) o A clear, specific, narrative description of what occurred so that knowledgeable readers conversant with the design of commercial nuclear power plants, but not familiar with the details of a particular plant, can understand the complete event o Plant operating conditions before the event o Status of structures, components, or systems that were inoperable at the start of the event and that contributed to the event 1

o Dates and approximate times of occurrences. [Validate dates and times]

o The cause of each component or system failure or personnel error, if known o The failure mode, mechanism, and effect of each failed component, if known o The EllS component function identifier and system name of each system referred to in the LER o For failures of components with multiple functions, include a list of systems or secondary functions that were also affected o For failure that rendered a train of a safety system inoperable, an estimate of the elapsed time from the discover of the failure until the train was returned to service o The method of discovery of each component or system failure or procedural error o Operator actions that affected the course of the event, including operator errors, procedural deficiencies, or both, that contributed to the event o For each personnel error, we Shall discuss:

• Whether the error was a cognitive error (e.g., failure to recognize the actual plant condition, failure to realize which systems should be functioning, failure to recognize the true nature of the event or a procedural error;

• Whether the error was contrary to an approved procedure, was a direct result of an error in an approved procedure, or was associated with an activity or task that was not covered b an approved procedure;

• Any unusual characteristics of the work location (e.g., heat, noise) that directly contributed to the error; and

• The type of personnel involved (i.e., contractor personnel, licensed operator, non-licensed operator, other licensee personnel o Discussed automatic and manually initiated safety system responses o Discussed the manufacturer and model number (or other identification) of each component that failed during the event.

o Provided an assessment of the safety consequences and implications of the event. This assessment must include the availability of other systems or components that could have performed the same function as the components ands stems that failed during the event o Provided a description of any corrective actions planned as a result of the event, including those to reduce the probability of similar events occurrin in the future 1

Added as result of Notification 20450306

LS-AA-117-1002 Revision 5 Page 6 of 6 Initials LER Quality Checklist (continued):

0 Provided reference to any previous similar events at the same plant that are known 0 Provided the name and telephone number of a person within the licensee's organization who is knowledgeable about the event and can provide additional information concerning the event and the plant's characteristics 0 Provided a clear statement regarding any Commitments 0 Provided clear statement regarding SSFF (NEI 99-02), e.g., "A review of this event determined that a Safety System Functional Failure (SSFF) as defined in NEI 99-02, Regulatory Assessment Performance Indicator Guidelines, did not occur. This event did not prevent the ability of a system to fulfill its safety function to either shutdown the reactor, remove residual heat, control the release of radioactive material, or mitigate the*

consequences of an accident." Or, "A review of this event determined that a Safety System Functional Failure (SSFF) as defined in NEI 99-02, Regulatory Assessment Performance Indicator Guidelines, did occur" and explain why 0 Review of SSFF completed by the Licensing NRC ROP SSFF Pl program owner (70040851) 0 Avoid referencing INPO OE Reports in Publicly Available NRC Licensee Event Reports 0 SOP Considered LER Format Initials 0 Form NRC 366 is the current form. Check upper right hand corner for expiration.

0 Docket and License Numbers are correct.

0 LER Number appropriate (Check for duplicate LER numbers) 0 Margins consistent 0 Fonts consistent 0 Spelling and Grammar 0 Pagination correct 0 LER submittal date has been correctly filled in on Page 1 of LER form Transmission Initials 0 Letter signed by appropriate individual 0 Envelope(s) correctly addressed. SGI envelopes properly protected 0 Document page checked 0 Document transmitted to Records Management 0 LER uploaded to www.inQo.org/inQolices.asQ 0 For HC - PORC minutes approving LER sent to CNO 0 For Salem - LER sent to CNO 0 PDF File of signed and dated letter created for NRC electronic submission 0 OCR and Preflight PDF file 0 Submit document to NRC and retain electronic submittal confirmation.

0 Traveler (per LS-AA-117-1002) is complete (including appropriate discipline signatures) 0 Commitments entered into Tracking Database 0 Correspondence log updated 0 Distribution timely

Ochoa, Alysse K.

From: Cachaza, Thomas J.

Sent: Friday, April 21, 2017 2:52 PM To: Ochoa, Alysse K.; Mallon, James; MacEwen, Thomas T.

Subject:

RE: Action Required: AREOR and ARERR signatures needed Importance: High Alysse, I have peer reviewed both cover letters and concur with content of the cover letters. Please attach my email as concurrence.

Thomas Cachaza Salem Senior Regulatory Compliance Engineer Phone (work): 856-339-5038 Phone (Home): 856-697-0430 Cell: 856-689-2416 Email: Thomas.Cachaza@PSEG.com From: Ochoa, Alysse K.

Sent: Friday, April 21, 2017 1:33 PM To: Chamy, Joseph; Kugler, Shelly F.; Pyle, Mark; Trimble, Harold; Hassler Sr, Matthew J. (Mgr Radiation Protection);

Mallon, James; Kraus, Alison R.

Cc: Cachaza, Thomas J.; MacEwen, Thomas T.; Pimentel, Frances A.; Ochoa, Alysse K.; Casulli, Edward T.; Grover, F.

Kenneth; Heathwaite, Rick M.; Mannai, David

Subject:

Action Required: AREOR and ARERR signatures needed

All, Thank you for your quick turn around with the reviews. The only changes made to the ARERR were fonts and table resizing and there were minor editorial changes made to the AREOR (changes can be found in the AREOR folder).

Next step - I need all the reviewers to sign off the traveler. You can eithe~ reply to this email that you approve/sign via email or, if you prefer to physically sign the traveler, let me know and I will get it to you .. ((l!~~.cl~t~~'.Ag(ij'z~;:,z'.gJ:i~ Please keep in mind that there is a regulatory due date for submittal, April 30, 2017.

Once all signatures are obtained, I will send the reports to both stations' Plant Managers to sign off the letter.

Attached to this email are the traveler and letter for each report. The final reports and changes can be found using the following links:

M:\Shared\Hope Creek Regulatory Assurance\Environmental Reports\2016 Salem-Hope Creek AREOR M:\Shared\Hope Creek Regulatory Assurance\Environmental Reports\2016 Salem-Hope Creek ARERR If you have any questions, please let me know.

Thank you.

Alysse Alysse K. Ochoa I ¢PSEG Nuclear LLC I Hope Creek Regulatory Assurance, Sr. Engineer P.O. Box 236, M/C Ho2, Hancocks Bridge, NJ 08038-1236 1

0: (856) 339-2742 I alysse.ochoa@pseg.com 2

Ochoa, Alysse K.

From: Kugler, Shelly F.

Sent: Friday, April 21, 2017 3:39 PM To: Ochoa, Alysse K.

Subject:

RE: Action Required: AREOR and ARERR signatures needed Approve via email From: Ochoa, Alysse K.

Sent: Friday, April 21, 2017 1:33 PM To: Chamy, Joseph; Kugler, Shelly F.; Pyle, Mark; Trimble, Harold; Hassler Sr, Matthew J. (Mgr Radiation Protection);

Mallon, James; Kraus, Alison R. ,

Cc: Cachaza, Thomas J.; MacEwen, Thomas T.; Pimentel, Frances A.; Ochoa, Alysse K.; Casulli, Edward T.; Grover, F.

Kenneth; Heathwaite, Rick M.; Mannai, David

Subject:

Action Required: AREOR and ARERR signatures needed

All, Thank you for your quick turn around with the reviews. The only changes made to the ARERR were fonts and table resizing and there were minor editorial changes made to the AREOR (changes can be found in the AREOR folder).

Next step - I need all the reviewers to sign off the traveler. You can either reply to this email that you approve/sign via

}.'.':".:",~., .. ~,, c' v * * ,"'"w'*w-<""".~"~-r"~

email or, if you prefer to physically sign the traveler, let me know and I will get it to you. t!?lJ,,e,~,~~~:.APr.!L2?(;~017j Please keep in mind that there is a regulatory due date for submittal, April 30, 2017.

Once all signatures are obtained, I will send the reports to both stations' Plant Managers to sign off the letter.

Attached to this email are the traveler and letter for each report. The final reports and changes can be found using the following links:

M:\Shared\Hope Creek Regulatory Assurance\Environmental Reports\2016 Salem-Hope Creek AREOR M:\Shared\Hope Creek Regulatory Assurance\Environmental Reports\2016 Salem-Hope Creek ARERR If you have any questions, please let me know.

Thank you.

Alysse Alysse K. Ochoa I \:rPSEG Nuclear LLC I Hope Creek Regulatory Assurance, Sr. Engineer P.O. Box 236, M/C Ho2, Hancocks Bridge, NJ 08038-1236 0: (856) 339-2742 I alysse.ochoa@pseg.com 1

Ochoa, Alysse K.

From: Kraus, Alison R.

Sent: Monday, April 24, 2017 9:01 AM To: Ochoa, Alysse K.

Subject:

RE: Action Required: AREOR and ARERR signatures needed I ~pprove.

Thank you!!!

From: Ochoa, Alysse K.

Sent: Monday, April 24, 2017 8:58 AM To: Kraus, Alison R.

Subject:

RE: Action Required: AREOR and ARERR signatures needed No worries. I do need your approval for the traveler for Environmental. If you are ok with it, please respond that you approve via email or if you prefer I can bring the traveler to you to sign.

Thank you.

Alysse 2742 From: Kraus, Alison R.

Sent: Friday, April 21, 2017 3:04 PM To: Ochoa, Alysse K.

Cc: Mallon, James

Subject:

RE: Action Required: AREOR and ARERR signatures needed Thank you for tracking this and keeping the process moving!!!

From: Ochoa, Alysse K.

Sent: Friday, April 21, 2017 1:33 PM To: Chamy, Joseph; Kugler, Shelly F.; Pyle, Mark; Trimble, Harold; Hassler Sr, Matthew J. (Mgr Radiation Protection);

Mallon, James; Kraus, Alison R.

Cc: Cachaza, Thomas J.; MacEwen, Thomas T.; Pimentel, Frances A.; Ochoa, Alysse K.; Casulli, Edward T.; Grover, F.

Kenneth; Heathwaite, Rick M.; Mannai, David

Subject:

Action Required: AREOR and ARERR signatures needed

All, Thank you for your quick turn around with the reviews. The only changes made to the ARERR were fonts and table resizing and there were minor editorial changes made to the AREOR (changes can be found in the AREOR folder).

Next step - I need all the reviewers to sign off the traveler. You can either reply to this email that you approve/sign via email or, if you prefer to physically sign the traveler, let me know and I will get it to you. [D~e"'Ciat~~p7Ji_j~}~qi~ Please keep in mind that there is a regulatory due date for submittal, April 30, 2017.

Once all signatures are obtained, I will send the reports to both stations' Plant Managers to sign off the letter.

Attached to this email are the traveler and letter for each report. The final reports and changes can be found using the following links:

• 1

- _ _J

M:\Shared\Hope Creek Regulatory Assurance\Environmental Reports\2016 Salem-Hope Creek AREOR M:\Shared\Hope Creek Regulatory Assurance\Environmental Reports\2016 Salem-Hope Creek ARERR If you have any questions, please let me know.

Thank you.

Alysse Alysse K. Ochoa I -OPSEG Nuclear LLC I Hope Creek Regulatory Assurance, Sr. Engineer P.O.. Box 236, M/C Ho2, Hancocks Bridge, NJ 08038-1236 0: (856) 339-2742 I alysse.ochoa@pseg.com 2

Ochoa, Alysse K.

From: Pyle, Mark Sent: Monday, April 24, 2017 8:49 PM To: Ochoa, Alysse K.

Subject:

RE: Action Required: AREOR and ARERR signatures needed Approve via email.

Mark Pyle From: Ochoa, Alysse K.

Sent: Friday, April 21, 2017 1:33 PM To: Chamy, Joseph; Kugler, Shelly F.; Pyle, Mark; Trimble, Harold; Hassler Sr, Matthew J. (Mgr Radiation Protection);

Mallon, James; Kraus, Alison R.

• Cc: Cachaza, Thomas J.; MacEwen, Thomas T.; Pimentel, Frances A.; Ochoa, Alysse K.; Casulli, Edward T.; Grover, F.

Kenneth; Heathwaite, Rick M.; Mannai, David

Subject:

Action Required: AREOR and ARERR signatures needed

All, Thank you for your quick turn around with the reviews. The only changes made to the ARERR were fonts and table resizing and there were minor editorial changes made to the AREOR (changes can be found in the AREOR folder).

Next step - I need all the reviewers to sign off the traveler. You can either reply to this email that you approve/sign via email or, if you prefer to physically sign the traveler, let me know and I will get it to you. fi)ikCfate:April :25~917: Please 4.~ ******* ~ ** ~ *.*.**.., .*.. h~* ~--~*-~~~'"'"'"'~'

keep in mind that there is a regulatory due date for submittal, April 30, 2017.

Once all signatures are obtained, I will send the reports to both stations' Plant Managers to sign off the letter.

Attached to this email are the traveler and letter for each report. The final reports and changes can be found using the following links:

M:\Shared\Hope Creek Regulatory Assurance\Environmental Reports\2016 Salem-Hope Creek AREOR M:\Shared\Hope Creek Regulatory Assurance\Environmental Reports\2016 Salem-Hope Creek ARERR If you have any questions, please let me know.

Thank you.

Alysse Alysse K. Ochoa I OPSEG Nuclear LLC I Hope Creek Regulatory Assurance, Sr. Engineer P.O. Box 236, M/C Ho2, Hancocks Bridge, NJ 08038-1236 0: (856) 339-2742 I alysse.ochoa@pseg.com 1

LS-AA-117-1002 Revision 5 Page 1 of 6 TYPICAL LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS CORRESPONDENCECONCURRENCEFORM Station(s): -~S=a~le~m=/~H=o=p=e-=C"-re=e=-k"'--------- Correspondence No.: LR-N17-0087 Subject/Document: 2016 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report Document Due Date: ---=0-"4/=2'"-7/=2=0...:..17'"-- Regulatory Driven Due Date: @ I NO Document Prepared by: -~A~l~vs~s~e_O~c_h_o_a_ _ Extension: _ _ 27_4_2_ __

If Routine NRC report, then document SAP recurring task or generate notification: _ _

Required Review and Disciplines Assigned by: =-Ja=m-'-'-"'-es:::...:..:M=a=ll=on'-'----'-------'D=-i"""'re=c=to=r_,_,_,_,R=e=g.'-'C=o=m.:.:.=pl=ia:..:..!n=ce Title Type of Review Required:

(Reference LS-AA-117)

Disciplines Required:

D Maintenance jif ~adiation Protection "*'chemistry D Training D Operations "O"'f::ngineering - l&C  :....E:fdRadwaste ',!!feg Assurance I Licensing D Rx Engineering D Design Engineering

• D Engr - Mech Systems [l Programs Engineering D Nuclear Fuels D Work Management D Engr - Elect Systems .!!!jJther: Environmental Affairs NOTE The following signatures indicate and affirm that technical inputs for this regulatory correspondence are technically correct, complete, and accurate in all material respects.

Alysse Ochoa Preparer Thomas MacEwen Peer Reviewer Thomas Cachaza Peer Reviewer Joseph Chamy CFAM - Chemistry Alison Kraus Manager - Env. Affairs Shelly Kugler Manager - HC Chemistry Mark Pyle Manager - Salem Chemistry Hal Trimble ,/ /I Manager - HC Rad Pro I J Matt Hassler Manager - Salem Rad Pro

{} ' I Required Reviews and Signatures (check as appropriate):

D Station Qualified Review Required: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Date: _ __

D Corporate Licensing Concurrence Required: Date: _ __

• !Station Regulatory Assurance Concurrence Required: Date: _ __

_ ,$,,~** James Mallon/ Dir. Site Reg. Compliance 0 PORC Approval Required: PORC Meeting No. _ _ _ _ _ PORC Chair_ _ _ _ _ _ _ __

~!!jPlant Manager Approval Required: Ken Grover and Ed Casulli/ On Letter Date: _ __

D Site Vice President Approval Required: Date: _ __

LS-AA-117-1002 Revision 5 Page 1 of 6 TYPICAL LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS CORRESPONDENCE CONCURRENCE FORM Station(s): -~S~a~le~m=/~H=o-=p-=-e-=C'"'""re-=-e=k_,___ _ _ _ _ _ _ Correspondence No.: LR-N17-0089 SubjecUDocument: 2016 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report Document Due Date: 04/27/2017 Regulatory Driven Due Date: @ I NO Document Prepared by: ---'-A'"""l"-'ys=-=s=e'-'0=-c=h-'-'o=a;___ Extension: --=27,_4=2,___ _

If Routine NRC report, then document SAP recurring task or generate notification: _ _

Required Review and Disciplines Assigned by: _Ja_m_es_M~a_ll_on~__/___D_ire~c~t~or~*~R=e~g~.C~om~P~lia=n~c~e Title Type of Review Required: D Technical Verification Team Review (Reference LS-AA-117) *Individual or Series Review D No Technical Review Disciplines Required:

D Maintenance w.'-!l!}adiation Protection

• bhemistry D Training D Operations D Engineering - l&C =o,ARadwaste *llllll!feg Assurance I Licensing D Rx Engineering D Design Engineering D Engr - Mech Systems n Programs Engineering D Nuclear Fuels D Work Management D Engr - Elect Systems ,!!!!Pther: Environmental Affairs NOTE The following signatures indicate and affirm that technical inputs for this regulatory correspondence are technically correct, complete, and accurate in all material respects.

Print Name l Signature Discipline Date*.

Alysse Ochoa Preparer Thomas MacEwen Peer Reviewer Thomas Cachaza Peer Reviewer Joseph Chamy CFAM - Chemistry Alison Kraus Manager - Env. Affairs Shelly Kugler Manager- HC Chemistry Mark Pyle Manager - Salem Chemistry Hal Trimble wJ ,,., ,_ - , I /} Manager - HC Rad Pro I /

Matt Hassler

.1

/Jbl l\1-(/ .

~CL.---

- Manager - Salem Rad Pro

~/ZS117 Required Reviews and Signatures {check as appropriate):

D Station Qualified Review Required: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Date: _ __

D Corporate Licensing Concurrence Required: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Date: _ __

• Station Regulatory Assurance Concurrence Required: Date: _ __

James Mallon/ Dir. Site Reg. Compliance 0 PORC Approval Required: PORC Meeting No. _ _ _ _ _ _ PORC Chair_ _ _ _ _ _ _ __

Date: _ __

D Site Vice President Approval Required: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Date: _ __

, I I LS*AA-117 -1002 Revision 5 Page 2of6 c

Quality Review Checklist

1. The following checklists should be selected based on the type of document being submitted (LER, LAR or other NRG correspondence)

a. Correspondence Checklist - Page 3

b. LAR - Page 4

c. LER - Pages 5 and 6

2. Only one checklist should be used for each document, ttie individual assigned the responsibility for the letter should fill out the checklist.

3. The peer reviewer can use the following checklists as a guide. * *

. *. *.*\ . :.

)

l:.. .

RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM PSEG NUCLEAR, LLC.

SALEM AND HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATIONS 2016 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT JANUARY 1 TO DECEMBER 31, 2016

Intentionally left blank TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Executive Summary ....................................................................................._...................... 1 II. Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 1 Ill. The Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program ..................................................... 2 A. Objectives of the Operational REMP .................................................................... 3 B. Implementation of the Objectives .......................................................................... 3 IV. Program Description ........................................................................................................ 4 A. Data Interpretation ....... ,......................................................................................... 4 B. Program Exceptions .............................................................................................. 5 C. Program Changes ................................................................................................. 6 D. Quality Assurance Program .................................................................................. 6 E. Summary of Results: Inter-laboratory Comparison Program .............................. 7 F. Summary of Results: Split Sample Comparison Program ................................. 10 V. Results and Discussion .................................................................................................. 11 A. Atmospheric ......................................................................................................... 12

1. Air Particulates .......................................................................................... 12

2. Air Iodine ................................................................................................... 13 B. Direct Radiation ................................................................................................... 13 C. Terrestrial .........................................................................................................,.. 15

1. Milk ............................................................................................................ 15

2. Well Water (Ground Water) ...................................................................... 16

3. Potable Water (Drinking Water) ............................................................... 17

4. Broadleaf Vegetables ............................................................................... 18

5. Vegetables .........................................-....................................................... 18

6. Fodder Crops ............................................................................................ 19

7. Soil ............................................................................................................ 20

8. Game ........................................................................................................ 20 D. Aquatic ................................................................................................................. 21

1. Surface Water ........................................................................................... 21

2. Fish ........................................................................................................... 24

3. Blue Crab .................................................................................................. 24

4. Sediment. .................................................................................................. 25

5. Oysters ...................................................................................................... 25 E. Land Use Survey ................................................................................................. 26 VI. Annotations to Previous ARE OR .................................................................................. 27 VII. Hope Creek Technical Specification Limit for Primary Water Iodine Concentrations. 31 VIII. Conclusions ................................................................................................................. 31 IX. References ..................................................................................................................... 31

-i-

TABLE OF CONTENTS (cont'd)

Appendix A - Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Summary ......................... 33 Appendix B - Sample Designation and Locations .............................................................. 45 Appendix C - Data Tables and Figures .............................................................................. 61 Appendix D - Summary of Inter-laboratory Comparison Program ..................... ;............... 95 LIST OF TABLES Table A-1 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Summary ..................... 37 Table 8-1 Salem and Hope Creek Generating Stations' Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program ......................................................... 47 Table B-2 Sampling Locations ...................................... ~ .......................................... 53 Table C-1 Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Quarterly Composites of Air Particulates, 2016 .................................................................................... 63 Table C-2 Concentrations of Gross Beta Emitters in Air Particulates, 2016 ............. 64 Table C-3 Concentrations of lodine-131 in Filtered Air, 2016 ................................... 66 Table C-4 Direct Radiation Measurements - Quarterly Dosimetry Results, 2016 ..... 68 Table C-5 Concentrations of lodine-131 and Gamma Emitters in Milk, 2016 ........... 69 Table C-6 Concentrations of Gross Alpha and Gross Beta Emitters and Tritium in Well Water, 2016 ............*.......................................................................... 71 Table C-7 Concentrations of of lodine-131 and Gamma Emitters in Well Water, 2016 ......................................................................................................... 72 Table C-8 Concentrations of Gross Alpha and Gross Beta Emitters and Tritium in Raw and Treated Potable Water, 2016 .................................................... 73 Table C-9 Concentrations of lodine-131 and Gamma Emitters in Raw and Treated Potable Water, 2016 .................................................................. 74 Table C-10 Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Broadleaf Vegetation (FPL) and Vegetables (FPV), 2016 ........................................................................... 75 Table C-11 Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Fodder Crops, 2016 .................... 78 Table C-12 Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Soil, 2016 .................................... 79

- ii -

LIST OF TABLES (cont'd)

Table C-13 Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Game, 2016 ................................ 80 Table C-14 Concentrations of Tritium in Surface Water, 2016 ................................... 81 Table C-15 Concentrations of lodine-131 and Gamma Emitters in Surface Water, 2016 .... :........................................ :............................................................ 82 Table C-16 Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Edible Fish, 2016 ......................... 85 Table C-17 Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Crabs, 2016 ................................. 86 Table C-18 Concentrations of Gamma Emitters iri Sediment, 2016 ........................... 87 Table C-19 Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Oysters, 2016 .............................. 88 Table C-20 Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Duplicate Samples from GEL ...... 89 Table D-1 Anal)itic's Environmental Radioactivity Cross Check Program Teledyne Brown Engineering Environmental Services ............................ 97 Table D-2 DOE's Mixed Analyte Performance Evaluation Program (MAPEP)

Teledyne Brown Engineering Environmental Services ........................... 100 Table D-3 ERA Environmental Radioactivity Cross Check Program Teledyne Brown Engineering Environmental Services ........................................... 101 Table D-4 GEL 2016 Eckert & Ziegler Analytics Performance Evaluation Results ..................................................................................................... 102 Table D-5 GEL 2016 Department of Energy Mixed Analyte Performance Evaluation Program (MAPEP) Results ................................................... 106 Table D-6 GEL 2016 ERA Program (RAD) Performance Evaluation Results ......... 111 Table D-7 GEL 2016 ERA Program (MRAD) Performance Evaluation Results ...... 113

- iii -

__ _ J

LIST OF MAPS Map B-1 Salem and Hope Creek Generating Stations' Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program On-Site Sampling Locations out to 1 mile ....................................................................................................... 57 Map B-2 Salem and Hope Creek Generating Stations' Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Off-Site Sampling Locations 1 to 10 miles ................................................................................................... 58 Map B-3 Salem and Hope Creek Generating Stations' Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Off-Site Sampling Locations Greater than 10 miles .............................................................................. 59 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1 Gross Beta Activity in Air Particulates - Quarterly Average For All Locations 2006 through 2016 .................................................................. 91 Figure 2 Cesium-137 Activity in Soil 1974 through 2016 (Triennial) ...................... 92 Figure 3 Tritium Activity in Surface Water - Quarterly Average 2006 through 2016 ......................................................................................................... 93

- iv -

LIST OF ACRONYMS OR TERMS (in alphabetical order)

% Percent A Acceptable a posteriori An "after the fact" limit representing the capability of a measurement system a priori A "before the fact" limit representing the capability of a measurement system AIO Air Iodine Analyte The substance being identified and measured in a chemical analysis APT Air Particulates ARE OR Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report Bq Beque re ls c Control CAP Corrective Action Program CARR Corrective/Preventive Action Request and Report (GEL CAP) eves Chemical Volume Control System DOE Department of Energy Dpm Disintegrations per minute ECH Crabs ERA Environmental Resource Associates ESF Fish ESS Sediment EZA Eckert & Ziegler Analytics, Inc.

FPL Broad Leafy Vegetation FPV Vegetables GAM Game GEL General Engineering Laboratories; Duplicate sample analysis vendor Gr-A Gross alpha Gr-B Gross beta H-3 Tritium HCGS Hope Creek Generating Station IDM Immersion Dose Monitor ISFSI Independent Spent Fuel Storar:ie Installation Kg Kilogram keV Kilo-electron volts L Liter LIMS Laboratory Information Management System LLD Lower Limit of Detection LTS Laboratory Testing Services m3 Cubic meter MAPEP Mixed Analyte Performance Evaluation Program MDC Minimum Detectable Concentration ml Milliliter MLK Milk

-v-

MilliRoentgen: a unit of radiation, used to measure the exposure of somebody or mR something to X-rays and gamma rays, defined in terms of the ionization effect on air.

Millirem: a unit for measuring amounts of radiation, equal to the effect that one mrem roentgen of X-rays or gamma-rays would produce in a human being. It is used in radiation protection and monitoring.

MWe Megawatt Electric MWt Megawatt Thermal N Not Acceptable NCR Nonconformance Report (TSE CAP)

NELAC National Environmental Laboratory Conference NRC U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ODCM Offsite Dose Calculation Manual pCi Picocuries PD Passive Dosimeter PE Performance Evaluation PSEG Public Service Enterprise Group PT Performance Testing PWR Potable (drinking) Water - Raw PWT Potable (drinking) Water - Treated QA Quality Assurance REMP Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program RGPP Radiological Groundwater Protection Program SA Salem SAR Safety Analysis Report SCFM Standard Cubic Feet per Minute SGS Salem Generating Station SOL Soil SOP Standard Operating Procedures Standard Quarter Standard Quarter =92 days SWA Surface Water TBE Teledyne Brown Engineering; Primary sample analysis vendor TEDA Triethylene-diamine Thermoluminescent Dosimeter: A TLD measures ionizing radiation exposure by measuring the intensity of visible light emitted from a crystal in the detector when the TLD crystal is heated. The intensity of light emitted is dependent upon the radiation exposure.

TS Technical Specifications uCi Microcuries USE PA United States Environmental Protection Agency VGT Fodder Crops w Warning WWA Ground (well) Water

- vi -

I. Executive Summary PSEG Nuclear, LLC (PSEG) operates Salem Generating Station (SGS) and Hope Creek Generating Station (HCGS) (collectively, the Site) and implements a Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program (REMP) in accordance with the Site Offsite Dose Calculation Manuals (ODCMs).

Based on the results from 2016 the concentration of plant related radioactive material in the environment that could be attributable to Site operations was only a small fraction of the combination of naturally occurring and non-plant related man-made radioactivity.

The data obtained from January 1st through December 31st 2016, (the Reporting Period) were comparable to the results obtained during the preoperational phase of the program, and are lower than the applicable limits. Combined with historical results collected since commercial operation, it can be concluded that the observed results were as expected and therefore; we conclude that the operation of the Site had no significant radiological impact on the health and safety of the* public or on the environment.

II. *Introduction The REMP monitors and evaluates the environment surrounding the Site to ensure that there are no adverse impacts on the health and safety of the public or on the environment. The results of the REMP are published annually in this Report, the Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report (AREOR). This AREOR provides a summary and interpretation of the data collected during the Reporting Period.

No cultural or historic resources officially identified and confirmed by regulatory agencies are known to exist at PSEG.

The REMP is based on NRG guidance as reflected in the Site ODCMs and establishes sample media, sampling locations, sampling frequency and analytical sensitivity requirements. It also identifies indicator and control locations established for comparison purposes to distinguish plant related radioactivity from naturally occurring or other radioactivity from man-made sources. The REMP also verifies the projected and anticipated radionuclide concentrations in the environment and evaluates exposures associated with releases of radionuclides. from the Site as described by the ODCM.

This program satisfies the requirements of 10CFR50 Section IV.B.2 Appendix I and provides surveillance of all appropriate critical exposure pathways to man. The REMP also complies with the following Technical Specifications and ODCM requirements:

Technical Unit ODCM Specifications 3/4. 12.1 SGS U1 6.8.4.h 6.9.1.7 3/4. 12.1 SGS U2 6.8.4.h 6.9.1.7 3/4. 12.1 HCGS U1 6.8.4.h 6.9.1.6 To demonstrate compliance with the requirements, samples of air particulates, air iodine, milk, surface water, ground (well) water, potable (drinking) water, vegetables, fodder crops, fish, crabs, oysters, game, soil, and sediment were collected and analyzed. External radiation dose measurements were also made in the vicinity of the Site using passive dosimeters. These environmental media were analyzed for one or more of the following: gamma emitting isotopes, tritium (H-3), iodine-131 (l-131), gross alpha, gross beta and immersion dose. Measurements made in the vicinity of the Site were compared to background or control measurements and the preoperational REMP study performed before.SGS Unit 1 became operational. The results of these analyses were used to assess the impact on the health and safety of the public or on .the environment of Site operations, thereby demonstrating compliance with the applicable Technical Specifications, ODCMs, and Federal regulations.

For the Reporting Period, there were a total of 1,779 analyses performed on 1,403 environmental samples. Most of the radioactive materials noted in this Report are either naturally occurring in the environment such as K-40 or Be-7, or a result of other non-plant related human activities, such as historical atmospheric nuclear weapons testing or medical wastes from offsite. The majority of the remaining samples did not contain plant related radionuclides above detection limits.

There were two surface water samples that had minor detectable levels of tritium that were associated with permitted liquid effluent releases, and were determined to have no significant dose impacts.

The detection capabilities for environmental samples, required by the Site ODCMs, were achieved for the Reporting Period. Any exceptions to the program are noted in the Report and the associated PSEG Nuclear corrective action identifier was included in parenthesis.

Ill. The Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program The Site is located in Lower Alloways Creek Township,. Salem County, New Jersey.

SGS consists of two operating pressurized water nuclear power reactors. SGS Unit 1 has a net rating of 1, 180 megawatt electric (MWe) and SGS Unit 2 has a net rating of 1, 178 MWe. The licensed core power for both Units is 3,459 megawatt thermal (MWt).

HCGS consists of an operating boiling water nuclear power reactor, which has a net rating of 1,212 MWe. The licensed core power is 3,840 MWt.

The Site is located on a man-made peninsula on the east bank of the Delaware River called Artificial Island. The peninsula was created by the deposition of hydraulic fill from dredging operations. The surrounding environment is characterized mainly by the Delaware River Estuary, extensive tidal marshlands, and low-lying meadowlands.

These land types make up a vast majority of the land area within five miles of the Site, with most of the remaining land used for agriculture.

Since 1968, a Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program (REMP) has been conducted at the Site. Starting in December 1972, a more extensive radiological monitoring program was initiated in preparation for the operation of SGS Unit 1. The operational REMP was initiated in December 1976 when SGS Unit 1 achieved criticality.

An overview of the 2016 REMP is provided in Table B-1. Radioanalytical data from samples collected under this program were compared with results from the preoperational phase and historical operational results. This report presents the REMP results for the Reporting Period.

A. Objectives of the Operational REMP:

The objectives of the Operational REMP as described in the Site ODCMs are:

1. To determine whether any significant increases occur in the concentration of radionuclides in critical pathways of exposure in the vicinity of Artificial Island.

2. To determine if the operation of the Site has resulted in any increase in the inventory of long lived radionuclides in the environment.

3. To detect any change in ambient gamma radiation levels.

4. To verify that Site operations do not have detrimental effects on the health and safety of the public or on the environment.

B. Implementation of the Objectives:

The following describes the actions taken by PSEG to meet the REMP objectives listed above:

1. Samples of various media were selected for monitoring due to the potential radiological dose impact to humans. The selection of samples was based on:

(a) Established critical pathways for the transfer of plant related radionuclides through the environment to man, and (b) Experience gained during the preoperational phase. Sampling locations were determined based on site meteorology, Delaware River Estuary hydrology, local demographics, and land uses.

2. Sampling locations are divided into two classes: indicator and control. Indicator locations are those which have the potential to be influenced by Site operations.

Control samples are collected at locations which are believed to be unaffected by Site operations, usually at 15 to 30 kilometers (9.3 to 18.6 miles) away from the Site. Fluctuations in the levels of radionuclides and direct radiation at indicator locations are evaluated with respect to analogous fluctuations at control locations.

Indicator and control location data are also evaluated relative to preoperational data.

3. Appendix A describes the coding system which identifies sample type and location and describes and summarizes the analytical results in accordance with Section 6.9.1.7 of ttie SGS ODCM and Section 6.9.1.6 of the HCGS ODCM.

Table A-1 summarizes average, minimum and maximum activities of the indicator locations, control locations and the location with the highest mean using values above the Minimum Detectable Concentration (MDC).

4. Appendix B Table B-1 lists the types of samples collected, sample frequency, and analysis types. Table B-2 lists location codes, locations, and latitude and longitude coordinates.

5. The sampling locations are also indicated on Maps B-1 for on-site sampling locations out to 1 mile; B-2 for off-site sampling locations 1 to 10 miles; and B-3 for off-site sampling locations greater than 10 miles.

IV. Program Description A. Data Interpretation Results of analyses are grouped according to sample type and presented in Appendix C data tables. All results above the Lower Limit of Detection (LLD) are at a confidence level of+/- 2 sigma. This represents the range of values into which 95%

of repeated analyses of the same sample should fall. As defined in NRG NUREG-1301 and NUREG-1302, LLD is the smallest concentration of radioactive material in a sample that will yield a net count (above system background) that will be detected with 95% probability, with only 5% probability of falsely concluding that a blank observation represents a "real signal." The equation for determining LLD is:

LLD= 4.66*Sb E

• V

• 2.22

• Y

• exp(-A.~t) 4.66 is the statistical factor from NU REG 1301 and 1302 Sb is the standard deviation of the background counting rate or of the counting rate of a blank sample as appropriate, as counts per minute, E is the counting efficiency, as counts per disintegration, V is the sample size in units of mass or volume, 2.22 is the number of disintegrations per minute per picocurie, Y is the fractional radiochemical yield, when applicable,

/.., is the radioactive decay constant for the particular radionuclide (sec-1 ), and L1t for environmental samples is the elapsed time between sample collection, or end of the sample collection period, and time of counting (sec).

The LLD is an a priori number, which represents the capability of the measurement system (including.instrumentation, procedure and sample type), and not an after the fact criteria for the presence of activity. All analyses are designed to achieve the required detection limits for environmental sample analysis as described in the Site ODCMs.

The Minimum *Detectable Concentration (MDC) is defined as above with the exception that the measurement is an a posteriori (after the fact) estimate of the presence of activity. The MDC should be lower than the required LLD.

The grouped data were averaged and standard deviations calculated. The +/- 2 sigma deviations of the averaged data represent sample and not analytical variability. For reporting and calculation of averages, any positive result above the MDC is considered to be a valid result.

B. Program Exceptions.

During the Reporting Period, exceptions to REMP sampling requirements involved Air Sampling Location weekly run times and Direct Radiation Monitoring dosimeters.

In all air sampling instances, sufficient sample was collected during the week to meet the required LLD. One dosimeter was not recovered at the end of the sampling period due to apparent vandalism, which represented one missed sample.

Air Sampling Locations

• REMP air sampling locations 5S1 and 5S2 lost power for 46.4 hours4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br /> the week of 1/18/16 to 1/26/16 and for 55. 7 hours8.101852e-5 days <br />0.00194 hours <br />1.157407e-5 weeks <br />2.6635e-6 months <br /> the week of 1/26/16 to 2/3/16. The power loss started at approximately 1030 on 1/24/16 and lasted until approximately 1630 on 1/28/16, and was due to an electrical fault which required replacement of parts to repair and restore power to the air sampling pumps. During weekly filter change out on 02/03/16 the sampler was observed to be operating normally and no other problems were noted (CAP:

20716923).

• REMP air sampling location 1F1 operated approximately 1.. 7 hours8.101852e-5 days <br />0.00194 hours <br />1.157407e-5 weeks <br />2.6635e-6 months <br /> less than expected on 4/18/16 due to loss of power because a vehicle hit a power pole supplying power to the sampler. The sampler was operating normally once power was restored (CAP: 20726321 ).

• REMP air location 14G1 operated* approximately 10.5 hours5.787037e-5 days <br />0.00139 hours <br />8.267196e-6 weeks <br />1.9025e-6 months <br /> less than expected the week of 05/16/16 to 05/23/16. There was severe weather that week which is believed to have temporarily disrupted power to the sampling location. During weekly filter change out on 05/23/16 the sampler was observed to be operating normally and no other problems were identified (CAP: 80116636-0010).

-- _J

• REMP air sampling location 5D1 operated approximately 10.6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br /> less than expected the week of 06/07/16 to 06/13/16. The loss of power was due to severe weather in the area. The air sample pumps were operating normally after power was restored and no other problems were noted (CAP:

20732859).

• REMP air sampling location 1F1 operated approximately 22.2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br /> less than expected the week of 06/07/16 to 06/13/16. The loss of power was du*e to severe weather in the area. The air sample pumps were operating normally after power was restored and no other problems were noted (CAP:

20732859).

Direct Radiation Monitors

• REMP Passive Dosimeters at location 11 F1 were not retrieved for the fourth Quarter 2016 sample period. The dosimeter container was absent from its location. The green netting used to hold dosimeters was found nearby but the dosimeters appeared to have been cut out. Location 11 F1 is approximately 6.2 miles South-West of the Site at Taylors Bridge, Delaware (CAP: 20750298)

• REMP Passive Dosimeters at locations 2S2 and 2S4 were switched for the first Quarter 2016 sample period. When the unintended sw.itch was discovered the decision was made to leave them in the locations deployed and corrections were made to locations of readings after the dosimeters were analyzed. There was no impact to dose monitoring since both locations were correctly monitored for the entire quarter (CAP: 20718252).

C. Program Changes No changes were made to the program during the Reporting Period.

D. Quality Assurance Program Teledyne Brown Engineering The results reported by TBE are consistent with the Quality Assurance Program as described in the TBE Quality Assurance Manual and the TBE Procedure Manual.

GEL Laboratories The results reported by GEL Laboratories, LLC (GEL) are consistent with the Quality System described in GEL's Quality Assurance Manual and the requirements of IS017025:2005.

E. Inter-laboratory Comparison Program Inter-laboratory Comparison Programs are independent checks on the precision and accuracy of laboratory analyses. These checks are performed as part of the REMP and are part of the quality assurance program.

TBE analyzed Performance Evaluation (PE) samples of air particulate, air iodine, milk, soil, vegetation and water matrices, as appropriate for 160 analyses (Appendix D, Tables D-1 through D-3).

GEL analyzed Performance Evaluation (PE) samples of air particulate, air iodine, milk, soil, vegetation and water matrices, as appropriate for 478 analyses (Appendix D, Tables D-4 through D-7).

The PE samples, supplied by Eckert & Ziegler Analytics, Inc. (EZA), Environmental Resource Associates (ERA), and the Department of Energy's (DOE) Mixed Analyte Performance Evaluation Program (MAPEP), were evaluated against the following acceptance criteria:

EZA Evaluation Criteria EZA's evaluation report provides a ratio of reported results and EZA's known value.

Since flag acceptance criteria values are not assigned by EZA, TBE evaluated the reported ratios based on internal QC requirements, which are based on the DOE MAPEP criteria.

ERA Evaluation Criteria ERA's evaluation report provides an acceptance range for control and warning limits with associated flag values. ERA's acceptance limits are established in accordance with the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), National Environmental Laboratory Conference (NELAC) performance testing (PT) program requirements, or ERA's standard operating procedure (SOP) for the Generation of Performance Acceptance Limits, as applicable. The acceptance limits are either determined by a regression equation specific to each analyte or a fixed percentage limit promulgated under the appropriate regulatory document.

DOE Evaluation Criteria MAPEP's evaluation report provides an acceptance range with associated flag values. The MAPEP defines three levels of performance: Acceptable (flag = "A"),

Acceptable with Warning (flag "W"), and Not Acceptable (flag "N"). Performance is considered acceptable when a mean result for the specified analyte is +/- 20% of the reference value. Performance is "acceptable with warning" when a mean result falls in the range from +/- 20% to +/- 30% of the reference value (i.e., 20% < bias <

30% ). If the mean result is greater than 30%, the results are deemed not acceptable.

Teledyne Brown Engineering For the TSE laboratory, 156 out of 160 analyses performed met the specified acceptance criteria. Four analyses (Milk - Sr-90, Vegetation - Sr-90, and Water - H-3 samples) did not meet the specified acceptance criteria for the following reasons and were addressed through the TSE CAP. Note: The Department of Energy (DOE)

Mixed Analyte Performance Evaluation Program (MAPEP) samples are created to mimic conditions found at DOE sites which do not resemble typical environmental*

samples obtained at commercial nuclear power facilities.

Teledyne Brown Engineering's MAPEP March 2016 APT cross check sample is now being provided to TBE by Analytics. MAPEP's policy is to evaluate as failed non reported nuclides that were reported in the previous study. Since the Sr-90 was reported in the previous MAPEP study but not in this study MAPEP evaluated the Sr-90 for Soil as failed (CAP: NCR 16-14).

The MAPEP March 2016 Sr-90 in vegetation was evaluated as failing a false positive test. In reviewing the data that was reported vs the data in Laboratory Information Management System (LIMS) it was found that the error was incorrectly reported as 0.023 rather than the correct value of 0.230. If the value had been reported with the activity and correct uncertainty of 0.301 +/- 0.230, MAPEP would have evaluated the result as acceptable (CAP: NCR 16-14).

Teledyne Brown Engineering's Analytics' March 2016 milk Sr-90 result of 15 +/- 0.125 pCi/L was higher than the known value of 11.4 pCi/L with a ratio of 1.32. The upper ratio of 1.30 (acceptable with warning) was exceeded. After an extensive review of the data it is believed the technician did not rinse the filtering apparatus properly and some cross contamination from one of the internal laboratory spike samples may have been transferred to the analytics sample. TBE determined the issue is specific to the March 2016 Analytics sample (CAP: NCR 16-26).

In November 2016 sample for H-3 in water from TB E's quality control vendor, ERA, was evaluated as failing. A result of 918 pCi/L was reported incorrectly due to a data entry issue. If the correct value of 9, 180 had been report~d, ERA would have evaluated the result as acceptable (CAP: NCR 16-34).

TBE's Analytics' December 2016 milk Sr-90 sample result of 14.7 +/- 0.26 pCi/L was higher than the known value of 10 pCi/L with a ratio of 1.47. The upper ratio of 1.30 (acceptable with warning) was exceeded. The technician entered the wrong aliquot into the LIMS system. To achieve a lower error term TBE uses a larger aliquot of 1.2L (normally 0.6L is used for client samples). If the technician had entered an aliquot of 1.2L il)tO the LIMS system, the result would have been 12.2 pCi/L, which would have been considered acceptable (CAP: NCR 16-35).

"j i

TBE's Analytics' December 2016 milk Sr-90 sample result of 14.7 +/- .26 pCi/L was higher than the known value of 10 pCi/L with a ratio of 1.47. The upper ratio of 1.30 (acceptable with warning) was exceeded. The technician entered the wrong aliquot into the LIMS system. To achieve a lower error term TBE uses a larger aliquot of 1.2L (normally 0.6L is used for client samples) (CAP: NCR 16-35).

GEL For the GEL laboratory, 471 out of 478 analyses performed met the specified acceptance criteria. Seven analyses (one Cs-137 in water, one Ra-226 in water, one Li-Total in water, two Gross Alpha in water, one Sr-89 in water and one Fe-55 in soil) did not meet the specified acceptance criteria for the following reasons and are being addressed through GEL's CAP.

GEL's ERA First Quarter 2016 Cs-137 in water (RAD-104) result was higher than the ERA known value. GEL analyzed sample duplicate and a remedial sample, QR030716U, both which passed the acceptance criteria. After a thorough review of all data, a definitive reason for the failure could not be determined (CAP: CARR 160229-1005).

GEL's ERA First Quarter 2016 Gross Alpha in water (RAD-104) had two results higher than the ERA known value. The samples were reanalyzed in duplicate and passed the acceptance criteria. After a thorough review of all data, a definitive reason for the failure could not be determined (CAP: CARR 160229-1005).

GEL's ERA Second Quarter 2016 Uranium-Total in water (MRAD-24) result was higher than the ERA known value. The failure was due to a transcription error when entering the data into the data base when Uranium-Total (mass) ug/L was reported as Uranium-Total activity in pCi/L. To eliminate this type of error from recurring, an additional parameter nam*e synonym was created in the LIMS (CAP: CARR 160519-1015).

MAPEP-16-MaS34 Second Quarter 2016 Fe-55 in Soil was below the known value.

After review of the data it was determined that not enough sample was used to accurately quantitate this analyte. Per the instruction, the sample contained <2000 Bq/kg of this isotope. The lab mistakenly did not use a large enough aliquot and count time to achieve a result lower than 2,000 Bq/kg. In the future, a larger sample aliquot and longer count time will be used for this sample (CAP: CARR 160602-1025).

MAPEP-16-MaW34 Second Quarter 2016 Ra-226 in water result was higher than the known value. Ra-226 was a new nuclide added to the MAPEP water sample. In the description, it stated that the specific activity is <25 Bq/L. Ra-226 at, or near this level, can easily be identified and quantified via the gamma analysis. However, the actual reference value was <1 Bq/L, which is lower than what can be accurately quantified via the gamma analysis.

J

In the future, a more sensitive method will be used to determine the Ra-226 activity for the MAPEP sample (CAP: CARR 160602-1025).

GEL's ERA Third Quarter 2016 Sr-89 in water (RAD-106) result was higher than the ERA known value. After a thorough review of all data, a definitive reason for the failure could not be determined (CAP: CARR 160830-1052).

F. Summary of Results: Split Sample Comparison Program Duplicate samples were obtained for some samples of air particulates, air iodine, milk, surface water, vegetables, soil, sediment, fish, and crab and the positive results are shown in Table C-20. These samples were analyzed by GEL as comparison and validation of TBE results.

1. Air Particulates Gross beta was detected by GEL in all 54 and by TBE in 53 of the 54 duplicate weekly APT samples. GEL detects significantly higher gross beta results due to

• different calibration energy sources used by each lab.

All four duplicate quarterly composite samples analyzed had positive results for Be-7.

2. Air Iodine All 54 duplicate sample results from GEL and TBE were less than MDC for 1-131.

3. Milk Naturally occurring K-40 was detected in all 13 duplicate samples and are all in agreement based on Criteria for Accepting the Licensee's Measurements in NRC Inspection Procedure 84525:

4. Surface Water Naturally occurring K-40 was detected in all four GEL results and in two of the corresponding TBE results. All detections were in agreement based on Criteria for Accepting the Licensee's Measurements in NRC Inspection Procedure 84525.

5. Vegetables Naturally occurring K-40 was detected by GEL and TBE in all 17 duplicate samples analyzed with 16 of 17 results acceptable while one result was outside the Criteria for Acceptance. The sample was reanalyzed and the* result was acceptable. GEL detected Be-7 in two of the samples while TBE did not detect Be-7 on any of the samples. All results are in agreement based on Criteria for Accepting the Licensee's Measurements in NRC Inspection Procedure 84525.

6. Sediment Naturally occurring K-40 was detected in both samples by both GEL and TSE.

Naturally occurring Ra-226 was detected in both samples by GEL detected Ra.:.

226 on both samples, but at levels below the MDC of TSE so a direct comparison could not be performed. Results are in agreement based on Criteria for Accepting the Licensee's Measurements in NRC Inspection Procedure 84525.

7. Soil Naturally occurring K-40 was detected in all three split samples by both GEL and TSE. Naturally occurring Ra-226 and residual Cs-137 were detected in all three samples by GEL, but at levels below the MDC of TSE so a direct comparison could not be performed on these nuclides. Results are in agreement based on Criteria for Accepting the Licensee's Measurements in NRC Inspection Procedure 84525.

8. Fish Naturally occurring K-40 was detected in the sample by both GEL and TSE.

Results are in agreement based on. Criteria for Accepting the Licensee's Measurements in NRC Inspection Procedure 84525.

9. Crab Naturally occurring K-40 was detected in all both samples by both GEL and TSE.

Results are in agreement based on Criteria for Accepting the Licensee's Measurements in NRC Inspection Procedure 84525.

V. Results and Discussion The analytical results of the 2016 REMP samples are divided into categories based on exposure pathways: atmospheric, direct radiation, terrestrial, and aquatic. The ingestion pathway is evaluated under the terrestrial and aquatic categories. The analytical results for the Reporting Period are summarized in Appendix A, Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Summary. The data for individual samples are presented in Appendix C data tables. The data are compared to the preoperational REMP data (1973-1976) and to historical data since Site operation commenced. The samples collected and analysis results indicate that the Site REMP was conducted in compliance with the Site Technical Specifications and ODCMs.

Effluent monitoring for the Site has historically included samples and analyses not specifically required by the Site ODCMs in addition to those required. Management Audit Samples are samples that are taken to augment the radiological effluent monitoring program, but do not fulfill any regulatory requirement. These analyses are referenced throughout the Report as Management Audit Samples. PSEG Nuclear continues to collect these samples. The summary tables in this Report include these Management Audit samples and associated analytical results. The following is a list and quantity of the Management audit samples collected in 2016:

Management Audit Sample Type Number of Samples Vegetables 21 Well Water 12 Potable Water (raw I treated) 12 I 12 Fodder Crops 4 Soil 9 Game 2 Oysters 4 A. Atmospheric APT samples were collected on glass fiber filters with low-volume air samplers sampling at approximately 1.5 SCFM. Air sample volumes were measured with calibrated dry-gas meters.

Samples for Iodine were collected from the air by adsorption on triethylene-diamine (TEDA) impregnated charcoal cartridges connected in series after the APT filters.

1 . Air Particulates APT samples were collected weekly at seven indicator locations (5S1, 7S2, 15S2, 501, 16E1, 1F1, and 2F6), one duplicate location (5S2) and one control location ( 14G 1). Each weekly sample collected was analyzed for gross beta by TBE. Quarterly composites of the weekly samples from each location were analyzed for specific gamma emitters. The duplicate air location sample was shipped to GEL for analysis (Tables C-1, C-2 and C-20).

Gamma Spectroscopy Gamma spectroscopy was performed on each of the 32 quarterly composite samples. Naturally occurring Be-7 was detected and no other gamma emitters were detected in any of the samples.

Naturally occurring Be-7, attributed to cosmic ray activity in the atmosphere, was detected in 28 of 28 indicator location composites at concentrations ranging from 85E-03 pCi/m 3 to 186E-03 pCi/m 3 with an average concentration of 118E-03 pCi/m 3 , and in the four control location composites ranging in concentration from 104E-03 pCi/m 3 to 168E-03 pCi/m 3 with an average concentration of 125.E-03 pCi/m 3 . The maximum preoperational level detected was 330E-03 pCi/m 3 with an average concentration of 109E-03 pCi/m 3 (Table C-1 and Reference [1] RMC-TR-77-03).

Gross Beta Gross beta activity was detected in 373 of 378 of the indicator location samples at concentrations ranging from 4E-03 pCi/m 3 to 26E-03 pCi/m 3 with an average concentration of 12E-03 pCi/m 3 , and in 52 of 54 of the control location samples at concentrations ranging from 5E-03 pCi/m 3 to 23E-03 pCi/m 3 with an average of 13E-03 pCi/m 3 . The maximum preoperational level detected was 920E-03 pCi/m 3 with an average concentration of 74E-03 pCi/m 3 (Table C-2 and Reference [1] RMC-TR-77-03). See Figure 1 for graphical presentation (Appendix C).

2. Air Iodine AIO were collected weekly at seven indicator locations (5S1, 7S2, 15S2, 5D1, 16E1, 1F1, and 2F6), one duplicate location (5S2) and one control location (14G1). The duplicate air location sample was shipped to GEL for duplicate analysis. Each sample was analyzed for 1-131, and none was detected in any indicator or control samples during the Reporting Period. The maximum preoperational level detected was 42E-03 pCi/m 3 (Table C-3 and Reference [1]

RMC-TR-77-03).

B. Direct Radiation Ambient radiation levels in the environment were monitored at locations on the Site and in the surrounding areas with pairs of passive dosimeters (PD) supplied and analyzed by Mirion Technologies. Packets containing the PDs were placed in the owner-controlled area, around the Site at various distances, and in each land based meteorological sector. Six were placed in control locations and the balance of measurement locations were placed at areas of interest such as population centers, nearby residences, and schools. The PDs at each location are changed and analyzed quarterly.

A total of 58 Immersion Dose Monitor (IDM) locations were established to monitor for direct radiation during 2016, including 20 on-site locations (1 S1, 2S2, 2S4, 3S1, 4S1,5S1,6S2, 7S1,8S1,9S1, 10S1,11S1, 12S1, 13S1, 14S1, 15S1,15S2, 16S1, 16S2 and 16S3), 32 off-site locations within the 10 mile zone (4D2, 5D1, 10D1, 14D1, 15D1,2E1,3E1, 11E2, 12E1, 13E1, 16E1, 1F1,2F2,2F5,2F6,3F2,3F3, 4F2,5F1,6F1,7F2,8F1~9F1, 10F2, 11F1, 12F1, 13F2, 13F3, 13F4, 14F2, 15F3 and 16F2) and six control locations beyond 10 miles (1 G3, 3G1, 1OG1, 14G1; 16G1 and 3H1).

Two Type 20 PDs are placed at each location. Each Type 20 PD contains three CaSO:Dy elements that monitor for photon exposure. Each PD also contains one Li BO: Mn element, which is not used for this application.

The average quarterly dose rate for the off-site indicator dosimeters was 13.0 mR/Standard Quarter. The average quarterly dose rate for site boundary locations, excluding locations 1S1 and 16S2, was 12.2 mR/Standard Quarter. The control locations had an average quarterly dose rate of 13.1 mR/Standard Quarter.

Subtracting the dose from the control locations from either the onsite or offsite locations indicates that there is no net dose from Site operations (Table C-4).

The two site boundary locations 1S1 and 16S2 were addressed separately due to measurable dose rates above background. The ambient radiation levels as measured by the two site boundary locations 1S1 and 16S2 ranged from 25.3 to 31.8 mR/Standard Quarter. The doses at these two locations were influenced by the radiation shine from the dry cask storage located in the nearby Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI). Assuming a nominal background of 52 mR/year (13 mR/Standard Quarter) and using the highest dose rate from location 16S2, the maximum dose rate above background in these areas was calculated to be of 64.3 mrem/year (116.3 mR/year - 52 mR/year

• 1.0 mrem/mR).

Dose to the nearest resident due to direct radiation from ISFSI was calculated to be 0.00694 mrem for the year which was a very small fraction of limit (40 CFR 190 and 10 CFR 72.104 both limit the dose to a real member of the public to 25 mrem in a year to the total body). The calculation was performed using the formula provided in ANSl/HPS N13.37-2014 as follows:

Where:

D1 = Dose that was measured from TLD Location 16S2 D2 = Dose that will be extrapolated to Nearest Resident R1 = Distance from the source to the location where D1 was obtained. (Distance from ISFSI to TLD at 16S2)

R2 = Distance from ISFSI to the location that dose will be extrapolated (Nearest Resident)

OF= Occupancy Factor (1 =full time)

D1 Net Dose D2 Dose Location R1 (ft) R2 (ft) OF (mrem) (mrem)

Nearest 203 64.3 19,536 1.0 6.94E-03 Resident The preoperational average for the quarterly PD readings was 4.4 mR/Standard Month or 13.2 mR/Standard Quarter. A review of historic results and direct radiation measurements for the reporting period confirmed that the radiation levels in the vicinity of the Site were similar to previous years; C. Terrestrial Terrestrial REMP sampling includes the collection of milk, well water, potable water, vegetables, fodder crops and soil samples.

Milk samples (MLK) were taken semi-monthly when cows were on pasture and monthly when cows were not grazing on open pasture, from three indicator locations (13E3, 14F4, 2G3) and one control location (3G1). Animals were considered on pasture from April to November of each year. Samples were collected in new polyethylene containers, sodium bisulfite was added as a sample preservative, and then samples were frozen and transported in ice chests to TBE.

Well water samples (WWA) were collected monthly from one location (3E1 ).

Separate raw water (PWR) and treated potable water (PWT) composite samples were collected monthly from one location (2F3). Each monthly composite was made up of weekly samples. All samples were collected in new polyethylene containers and shipped to TBE for analysis.

Locally grown vegetables (FPV) were collected at the time of harvest at seven locations (2F9, 3F8, 14F4, 15F4, 1G1, 2G2 and 3H5); fodder crops (VGT) were sampled at four locations (13E3, 14F4, 2G3 and 3G1); and broad leaf vegetation (FPL) was sampled at seven locations (1S1, 7S2, 15S2, 16S1, 10D1, 1G1, and 3H5). The vegetables and fodder samples are additional samples (Management Audit) taken to enhance the radiological monitoring program. There is no dairy farm within three miles of the Site and there is only one dairy farm within five miles.

Therefore, broad leaf vegetation is grown, maintained and harvested monthly during the growing season. All samples were weighed, packaged and shipped to TBE for analysis.

1. Milk Milk samples were collected from two farms in New Jersey (2G3 and 3G1) and two farms in Delaware (13E3 and 14F4). Each sample was analyzed for 1-131 and gamma emitters.

1-131 1-131 was not detected above MDC in any of the 80 samples analyzed. The maximum preoperational level detected was 65 pCi/L, which occurred following a period of atmospheric nuclear weapons tests (Table C-5 and Reference [1]

RMC-TR-77-03).

Gamma Spectroscopy No plant related gamma emitters were detected above the MDC in any of the indicator or control location milk samples.

Naturally occurring K-40 was detected in all 80 milk samples with concentrations for the 60 indicator location samples ranging from 1, 102 pCi/L to 1,644 pCi/L with an average, concentration of 1,365 pCi/L, and the 20 control location sample concentrations ranging from 1, 129 pCi/L to 1,683 pCi/L, with

• an average concentration of 1,336 pCi/L. The maximum preoperational level detected was 2,000 pCi/L with an average concentration of 1,437 pCi/L (Table C-5 and Reference [1] RMC-TR-77-03).

2. Well Water (Ground Water)

Although offsite wells in the vicinity of the Site are not directly affected by plant operations, well water samples were collected monthly from one farm (3E1 ).

Samples from this well are considered Management Audit samples.

Gross Alpha Gross alpha activity was not detected above the MDC in any of the well water samples. The maximum preoperational level detected was 9.6 pCi/L (Table C-6 and Reference [1] RMC-TR-77-03).

Gross Beta Gross beta activity was detected in four of 12 well water samples above the MDC with concentrations ranging from 2.8 pCi/L to 3.8 pCi/L, with an average

• concentration of 3.2 pCi/L. The preoperational results ranged from <2.1 pCi/L to 38 pCi/L, with an average value of 9 pCi/L (Table C-6 and Reference [1] RMC-TR-77-03).

Tritium Tritium activity was not detected above the MDC in any of the well water samples.

The maximum preoperational level detected was 380 pCi/L (Table C-6 and Reference [1] RMC-TR-77-03).

1-131 1-131 activity was not detected in any of the well water samples. No preoperational data were available for comparison, since 1-131 was not analyzed as a specific radionuclide prior to 1989. However, 1-131 analytical results to date have been below the MDC (Table C-7 and Reference [1] RMC-TR-77-03).

Gamma Spectroscopy No plant related gamma emitters were detected above the MDC in any of the indicator or control location well water samples. Naturally occurring K-40 was detected in one of the well water samples with a concentration of 122 pCi/L. The maximum preoperational levels detected were 30 pCi/L and 2.0 pCi/L, respectively (Table C-7 and Reference [1] RMC-TR-77-03).

3. Potable Water (Drinking Water)

Both raw and treated potable water samples were collected and composited at the local water treatment facility. Each sample consisted of weekly aliquots composited into a monthly sample. The raw water source for this plant is a combination of surface water from Laurel Lake and groundwater from its adjacent wells. These are Management Audit samples as no liquid effluents discharged from the Site directly affect this pathway.

Gross Alpha

• No Gross alpha activity was detected in any of the raw or treated water samples.

The maximum* preoperational level detected was 2.7 pCi/L (Table C-8 and

. Reference [1] RMC-TR-77-03).

Gross Beta

• Gross beta activity was detected in 10 of the 12 raw water samples and in 12 of the 12 treated water samples. The concentrations for the raw samples ranged from 3.5 pCi/L to 7 .0 pCi/L, with an average concentration of 5.4 pCi/L.

Concentrations for the treated watenanged from 5.2 pCi/L to 7.2 pCi/L, with an average concentration of 6.0 pCi/L. The maximum preoperational level detected was 9.0 pCi/L with an average concentration of 4.2 pCi/L (Table C-8 and Reference [1] RMC-TR-77-03).

Tritium Tritium activity was not detected in any of the raw or treated water samples. The maximum preoperational level detected was 350 pCi/L with an average of 179 pCi/L (Table C-8 and Reference [1] RMC-TR-77-03).

1-131 1-131 activity was not detected in any of the raw or treated water samples. No preoperational data were available for comparison, since 1-131 was not analyzed as a specific radionuclide prior to 1989. However, 1-131 analytical results to date have been below the MDC (Table C-9 and Reference [1] RMC-TR-77-03).

Gamma Spectroscopy No plant related gamma emitters were detected above the MDC in any of the potable water samples. Naturally occurring K-40 was not detected in any of the raw or treated water samples. No preoperational data were available for comparison. Naturally occurring Ra-226 was not detected in any raw or treated water samples. The maximum preoperational level detected for Ra-226 was 1.4 pCi/L (Table C-9 and Reference [1] RMC-TR-77-03).

4. Broadleaf Vegetation Broadleaf vegetation was grown by PSEG personnel at four onsite locations and one offsite location in Delaware at 3.9 miles SSW for purposes of REMP sampling. These broadleaf vegetation samples were collected since there were

. no dairy farms operating within the five km (three mile) radius of the Site. The closest dairy farm (13E3) was located in Odessa, DE at 5.0 miles to the West.

All samples were analyzed for gamma emitters and included kale, cabbage, and collards. These samples were obtained from five indicator locations (61 samples) and two control locations (2 samples). The results for these samples are

.discussed below.

Gamma Spectroscopy No plant related gamma emitters were detected above the MDC in any of the indicator or control location broad leaf vegetation samples.

Naturally occurring Be-7, attributed to cosmic ray activity in the atmosphere, was detected above the MDC in six of the 61 indicator location samples with concentrations ranging from 204 pCi/kg (wet) to 1,694 pCi/kg (wet), with an average concentration of 525 pCi/kg (wet). Be-7 was not detected in any of the two control location samples. No preoperational Be-7 data was available for comparison (Table C-10).

Naturally occurring K-40 was detected in all 61 indicator samples, with concentrations ranging from 1,772 pCi/kg (wet) to 8,761 pCi/kg (wet) with an average concentration of 4,052 pCi/kg (wet), and in both control location samples at concentrations ranging from 1,557 pCi/kg (wet) to 2,634 pCi/kg (wet) with an average concentration of 2,096 pCi/kg (wet). The maximum preoperational level detected was 4,800 pCi/kg (wet) with an average concentration of 2, 140 pCi/kg (wet) (Table C-10 and Reference [1] RMC-TR-77-03).

5. Vegetables There are no farm products that are irrigated with.water in which plant effluents have been discharged. The Delaware River at the location of the Site is brackish and therefore is not used for irrigation.

A variety of food products were sampled on and around the Site; however, the variety was dependent on the farmer's preference. These vegetables were collected as Management Audit samples.

All samples were analyzed for gamma emitters and included asparagus, soy beans, sweet corn, peppers, tomatoes, and peaches. These samples were obtained from seven indicator locations (21 samples). The results for these samples are discussed below.

Gamma Spectroscopy No plant related gamma emitters were detected above the MDC in any of the indicator or control location vegetable samples.

• Naturally occurring Be-7, attributed to cosmic ray activity in the atmosphere, was not detected above the MDC in any of the vegetables samples.

Naturally occurring K-40 was detected in all 21 indicator samples, with concentrations ranging from 923 pCi/kg (wet) to 14,270 pCi/kg (wet) with an average concentration of 2,425 pCi/kg (wet). The maximum preoperational level detected was 4,800 pCi/kg (wet) with an average concentration of 2,140 pCi/kg (wet) (Table C-10 and Reference [1] RMC.:TR-77-03).

6. Fodder Crops Although not required by the Site ODCMs, four samples of silage normally used as cattle feed were collected from three indicator locations and one control location. It was determined that these products could be an element in the food-chain pathway. These fodder crops were collected as Management Audit samples and analyzed for gamma emitters. All four locations from which samples were collected are milk sampling locations.

• Gamma Spectroscopy No plant related gamma emitters were detected above the MDC in any of the indicator or control location fodder crop samples. Naturally occurring Be-7, attributed to cosmic ray activity in the atmosphere, was detected in one of the three indicator samples with a concentration of 293 pCi/kg (wet) and in the control location sample with a concentration of 308 pCi/kg (wet). The maximum preoperational level detected for fodder was 4,700 pCi/kg (wet) with an average concentration of 2,000 pCi/kg (wet) (Table C-11 and Reference [1] RMC-TR 03).

Naturally occurring K-40 was detected in all three indicator samples at concentrations ranging from 2,983 pCi/kg (wet) to 3,478 pCi/kg (wet) with an average concentration of 3, 196 pCi/kg (wet), and in the one control location sample at a concentration of 3,565 pCi/kg (wet). Preoperational results averaged 7,000 pCi/kg (wet) (Table C-11 and Reference [1] RMC-TR-77-03).

7. Soil Soil is sampled every three years and analyzed for gamma emitters. Nine locations were sampled in 2016. These Management Audit samples were collected in areas that have been relatively undisturbed since the last collection in order to determine any change in 'the radionuclide inventory of the area (Table C-12).

Gamma Spectroscopy Naturally occurring K-40 was detected in all nine indicator samples at concentrations ranging from 6,844 to 16,980 pCi/kg (dry) with an average concentration of 10,393 pCi/kg (dry). The maximum preoperational level detected was 24,000 pCi/kg (dry) with an average of 10,000 pCi/kg (dry) (Table C-12). .

Cs-137 was detected in three of the nine indicator samples at concentrations ranging from 173 to 344 pCi/kg (dry) with an average concentration of 259 pCi/kg (dry). The maximum preoperational level detected was 2,800 pCi/kg (dry) with an average of 800 pCi/kg (dry). See Figure 2 for graphical presentation (Table C-12).

Naturally oc~urring Ra-226 was det~cted in three of the nine indicator samples at concentrations ranging from 1,499 to 2,750 pCi/kg (dry) with an average concentration of 2,262 pCi/kg (dry). The maximum preoperational level detected was 1,500 pCi/kg (dry) with an average of 870 pCi/kg (dry) (Table C-12).

Naturally occurring Th-232 was detected in all of the nine indicator samples at concentrations ranging from 358 to 935 pCi/kg (dry) with an average concentration of 644 pCi/kg (dry). The maximum preoperational level detected was 1,400 pCi/kg (dry) with an average of 740 pCi/kg (dry) (Table C-12).

8. Game Although not required by the Site ODCMs, two muskrat samples were collected from two indicator locations. The game samples were collected as Management Audit samples and analyzed for gamma emitters.

Gamma Spectroscopy No plant related gamma emitters were detected above the MDC in any of the indicator game samples. Naturally occurring K-40 was detected in both samples at concentrations ranging from 2,727 to 2,855 pCi/kg (wet) with an average concentration of 2,791 pCi/kg (wet). No preoperational data was available for comparison (Table C-13 and Reference [1] RMC-TR-77-03).

D. Aquatic This sample set includes edible fish, shoreline and riverbed sediment, surface water, crabs, and oysters.

Surface water samples were collected offshore in new polyethylene containers that were rinsed twice with the sample medium prior to collection. The surface water samples were transported to TBE for analysis.

Edible fish were collected using gill nets while crabs were caught in commercial traps. These samples were processed by separating the flesh from the bone and shell. The flesh was placed in sealed containers and frozen before being transported in ice chests to TBE for analysis.

Sediment samples were taken with a bottom grab sampler and frozen in sealed polyethylene containers before being transported in ice chests to TBE. For the river bottom sediment, a marine GPS was used to locate the correct site and the sampling boat was maneuvered over the area until the correct amount of sample was obtained (grabbed) with the sediment dredge.

Location 6S2 shoreline sediment sample (an onsite location) was sampled as follows: A square area, measuring one meter on each side was staked out and then divided into a grid of nine smaller boxes, three per side. A one inch deep scoop from the center of each of the small grids was taken. All the aliquots were combined and the total sample transported in the ice chest to TBE.

Oyster samples were collected by personnel licensed to harvest oysters by the State of New Jersey. Oysters in the vicinity of the plant were not large enough to be sold to the public, so they were added to the REMP as Management Audit samples. Oysters were collected and shucked; then the flesh and internal fluids were placed in sealed containers and frozen before being transported in ice chests to TBE for analysis.

1. Surface Water Surface water samples were collected twice a month at four indicator locations and one control location in the Delaware River Estuary. The two samples for the month were combined to create a single monthly composite sample that was then analyzed. One location (11A1) is at the outfall area (which is the area potentially impacted by effluents discharged from the Site into the Delaware River), one location is downstream from the outfall area (7E1 ), and one location is directly west of the outfall area at the mouth of the Appoquinimink River ( 12C1 ). Samples were collected upstream in the Delaware River (1 F2) and at the mouth of the Chesapeake and Delaware Canal (16F1) the latter being sampled when the flow was from the Canal into the river.

Location 12C1, located directly west of the Site, at the mouth of the Appoquinimink River, serves as the control. 12C1 was chosen as the control location because the physical characteristics of this location more closely resemble those of the outfall area than do those at the farther upstream location (1 F2). As discussed in the preoperational summary report, due to its tidal nature, there were flow rate and salinity variations in the Delaware River Estuary. These variations accounted for the differences in K-40 concentrations.

Tritium Tritium activity was detected in two of 48 indicator sample analyses with the first concentration of 2,540 pCi/L at location 11A1 in the April composite and with the second concentration of 1,600 pCi/L also at location 11A1 in the August composite. Evaluation of the samples which indicate positive tritium activity are described below. Tritium was not detected above MDC on any of the control sample analyses. The maximum preoperational level detected was 600 pCi/L, with an average concentration of 210 pCi/L (Table C-14 and Reference [1] RMC-TR-77-03). See Figure 3 for graphical presentation.

The April 2016 composite for surface water sampled at location 11A1 (0.2 miles SW of the SGS Outfall Area) identified tritium activity at 2,540 pCi/L with a two sigma uncertainty of+/- 321 pCi/L and a Minimum Detectable Concentration of 310 pCi/L. The dose impact, from the maximum tritium activity observed, to the maximum exposed individual through the consumption of fish and crabs was 7 .29E-3 mrem/yr. This does not present any significant exposure.

Sample location 11A1 is in very close proximity to the SGS outfall where the circulating water discharge and subsequent permitted discharge of liquid radwaste tanks occurs. During both sample collections for the composite an actual liquid release was in progress.

The first part of the composite sample was obtained on 4/10/2016 at 1808 hours0.0209 days <br />0.502 hours <br />0.00299 weeks <br />6.87944e-4 months <br /> while release permit number 53630 from Unit 2 was occurring from 1414 hours0.0164 days <br />0.393 hours <br />0.00234 weeks <br />5.38027e-4 months <br /> to 1941 hours0.0225 days <br />0.539 hours <br />0.00321 weeks <br />7.385505e-4 months <br />. Release 53630 was from the #21 Chemical Volume Control System Monitor Tank.

The second part of the composite sample was obtained on 4/21/2016 at 1520 hours0.0176 days <br />0.422 hours <br />0.00251 weeks <br />5.7836e-4 months <br /> while release permit number 53650 from Unit 2 was occurring from 1402 hours0.0162 days <br />0.389 hours <br />0.00232 weeks <br />5.33461e-4 months <br /> to 2138 hours0.0247 days <br />0.594 hours <br />0.00354 weeks <br />8.13509e-4 months <br />. Release 53650 was from the #21 Chemical Volume Control System Monitor Tank.

A correlation was performed to evaluate the relationship between the quantities of radioactive effluent released and the resultant dose to individuals from principal pathways of exposure. Assumptions used to correlate the results were that tritium measured at 11A1 were associated with releases that occurred during the composite sample collection.

Due to the lack of a local stream flow gauge and uncertainties associated with tidal influences, a very conservative estimate of dilution flow in the Delaware River consisting of measured stream flow and inputs farther upstream from the site was developed. The correlation determined that the actual measured concentration is reasonably close to the predicted concentration. Differences may be due to many unknown factors including tidal recirculation and various river and tidal mixing factors (CAP: 20728201 ).

The August 2016 composite sample for surface water sampled at location 11A1 (0.2 miles SW of the SGS Outfall Area) identified tritium activity at 1,600 pCi/L with a two sigma uncertainty of +/- 227 pCi/L and a Minimum Detectable Concentration of 247 pCi/L. The dose impact, from the maximum tritium activity observed, to the maximum exposed individual through the consumption of fish and crabs was 4.37E-3 mrem/yr. This does not present a significant exposure.

Sample location 11A1 is in very close proximity to the permitted SGS outfall where the circulating water discharge and subsequent permitted discharge of liquid radwaste tanks occurs. *During the first sample collection, which occurred on 8/3/2016, an actual liquid release was in progress. There was no release in progress for the second sample on 8/19/2016.

The first part of the composite sample was obtained on 8/3/2016 at 1525 hours0.0177 days <br />0.424 hours <br />0.00252 weeks <br />5.802625e-4 months <br /> while release permit number 53744 from Unit 1 was occurring from 1519 hours0.0176 days <br />0.422 hours <br />0.00251 weeks <br />5.779795e-4 months <br /> to 2320 hours0.0269 days <br />0.644 hours <br />0.00384 weeks <br />8.8276e-4 months <br />. Release 537 44 was from a Chemical Volume Control System Monitor Tank.

The second part of the composite sample was obtained on 8/19/2016 at 0639 hours0.0074 days <br />0.178 hours <br />0.00106 weeks <br />2.431395e-4 months <br /> while there was no release in progress. There were no releases from either unit within 1 day of the second sample.

A evaluation was performed to correlate the relationship between the quantities of radioactive effluent released and the resultant dose to individuals from principal pathways of exposure. Assumptions used to correlate the results were that tritium measured at 11A1 was associated with releases that occurred during the composite sample collection of the first sample. Since there was no release in progress at the time of the second sample, it is assumed for correlation purposes, that there was no plant related tritium in the second sample.

The correlation determined that the actual measured concentration is reasonably close to the predicted concentration. Differences may be due to many unknown factors including tidal recirculation and various river and tidal mixing factors at the point of sample collection (CAP: 20740887).

Gamma Spectroscopy No plant related gamma emitters were detected above the MDC in any of the indicator or control surface water samples.

Naturally occurring K-40 was detected in 17 of the 48 indicator location samples at concentrations ranging from 78 pCi/L to 168 pCi/L with an average concentration of 124 pCi/L, and in six of the 12 control location samples at concentrations ranging from 66 pCi/L to 253 pCi/L and an average of 129 pCi/L.

The maximum preoperational level detected for K-40 was 200 pCi/L with an average concentration of 48 pCi/L (Table C-15 and Reference [1] RMC-TR 03).

1-131 1-131 was not detected above the MDC in any of the 48 indicator samples or in any of the control location samples (Table C-15).

2. Fish Edible species of fish were collected semi-annually at two indicator locations and one control location and analyzed for gamma emitters in edible flesh. Sample species collected in 2016 were striped bass and catfish.

Gamma Spectroscopy No plant related gamma emitters were detected above the MDC in any of the indicator or control location fish samples. Naturally occurring K-40 was detected in all six indicator location samples at concentrations ranging from 3,325 pCi/kg (wet) to 4,668 pCi/kg (wet) with an average concentration of 3,871 pCi/kg (wet),

and all four control location samples at concentrations ranging from 3,531 pCi/kg (wet) to 4,534 pCi/kg (wet) with an average concentration of 4,209 pCi/kg (wet).

The maximum preoperational level detected was 13,000 pCi/kg (wet) with an average concentration of 2,900 pCi/kg (wet) (Table C-16 and Reference [1] RMC-TR-77-03).

3. Blue Crab Blue crab samples were collected twice during the season at one indicator and one control location. The edible portions were analyzed for gamma emitters.

Gamma Spectroscopy No plant related gamma emitters were detected above the MDC in any of the indicator or control location blue crab samples. Naturally occurring K-40 was detected in both indicator location samples at concentrations of 2,832 pCi/kg (wet) and 3,223 pCi/kg (wet) with an average concentration of 3,028 pCi/kg (wet),

and in both control location samples at concentrations of 2,203 pCi/kg (wet) and 3,238 pCi/kg (wet) with an average concentration of 2,721 pCi/kg (wet). The maximum preoperational level for K-40 detected was 12,000 pCi/kg (wet) with an average concentration of 2,835 pCi/kg (wet). All other gamma emitters were less than the MDC (Table C-17 and Reference [1] RMC-TR-77-03) .

. __ __J

4. Sediment Sediment samples were collected semi-annually from six indicator locations and one control location. Location 6S2 was the only shoreline sediment sample location that was directly subjected to tidal fluctuations. The remaining locations were located offshore.

Gamma Spectroscopy Naturally occurring K-40 was detected in all 12 indicator location samples at concentrations ranging from 2,365 pCi/kg (dry) to 16,410 pCi/kg (dry), with an average concentration of 8,081 pCi/kg (dry), and at both control locations samples at concentrations of 15,620 pCi/kg (dry) and 16,810 pCi/kg (dry) with an average concentration of 16,215 pCi/kg (dry). The maximum preoperational level detected was 21,000 pCi/kg (dry) with an average concentration of 15,000 pCi/kg (dry) (Table C-18 and Reference [1] RMC-TR-77-03).

Cs-137 was not detected in any of the indicator samples. The maximum preoperational level detected was 400 pCi/kg (dry) with an average concentration of 150 pCi/kg (dry) (Table C-18 and Reference [1] RMC-TR-77-03).

Naturally occurring Ra-226 was detected in three of the 12 indicator location samples at concentrations ranging from 1,465 pCi/kg (dry) to 3,012 pCi/kg (dry) with an average concentration of 2,120 pCi/kg (dry) and in one of the control location samples at a concentration of 2,513 pCi/kg (dry). The maximum preoperational level detected was 1,200 pCi/kg (dry) with an average concentration of 760 pCi/kg (dry) (Table C-18 and Reference [1] RMC-TR 03).

Naturally occurring Th-232 was detected in nine of the 12 indicator location samples at concentrations ranging from 227 pCi/kg (dry) to 1,002 pCi/kg (dry) with an average concentration of 697 pCi/kg (dry), and in both of the control location samples at concentrations of 965 pCi/kg (dry) and 1,303 pCi/kg (dry) with an average concentration of 1, 134 pCi/kg (dry). The maximum preoperational level detected was 1,300 pCi/kg (dry) with an average concentration of 840 pCi/kg (dry). All other gamma emitters were less than the MDC (Table C-18 and Reference [1] RMC-TR-77-03).

5. Oysters Oyster samples were collected twice during the season at one indicator and one control location. The edible portions were analyzed for gamma emitters.

Gamma Spectroscopy No plant related gamma emitters were detected above the MDC in any of the indicator or control location oyster samples.

Naturally occurring K-40 was detected in one of the two indicator location samples at a concentration of 1,485 pCi/kg (wet), and in one of the two control location samples at a concentration of 1,568 pCi/kg (wet). Both the indicator and control samples with K-40 were obtained in October. There were no preoperational analyses preformed on oysters as there were no significant quantities of oysters or other shellfish within 5 miles of the plant discharge. All other gamma emitters were less than the MDC (Table C-19 and Reference [6]).

E. Land Use Survey A land use survey was conducted during the Reporting Period in each of the 16 meteorological sectors to identify, within a distance of 8 km (5 miles), the location of the nearest milk animal, the nearest meat animal, the nearest residence and the nearest garden of greater than 50 m2 (500 ft2 ) producing broad leaf vegetation. In accordance with the Site ODCMs, the survey was performed using a visual survey, Post Office inquiries, Yellow Pages, and Google Earth mapping software.

No cultural or historic resource officially identified and confirmed by regulatory agencies is known to exist at PSEG.

A comparison of the identified locations from the 2016 table with the 2015 table shows that there was no change to the nearest resident or vegetable garden larger than 50 m2 (500 ft2 ) with broadleaf vegetation. However, distance to n*earest milk animal in the W sector was changed from 7.8 Km to 8.0 Km because the dairy farmer sold part of his land nearest the Site. Dose evaluations do not need to be updated and no changes to the Site ODCMs are required. The 2016 Land Use Survey results are summarized below:

Milk Nearest Vegetable Animal Residence Garden Meat Animal Meteorological August, 2016 August, 2016 August, 2016 August, 2016 Sector Km (miles) Km (miles) Km (miles) Km (miles)

N None None None None NNE None 8.0 (5.0) None 6.8 (4.2).

NE None 6.2 (3.9) None None ENE None 6.2 (3.9) None None E None None None None ESE None None None None SE None None None None SSE Norie None None None s None None None None SSW None 6.2 (3.9) None None SW None 6.9 (4.3) None 7.3 (4.6)

WSW None 7.1 (4.4) None None w 8.0 (5.0) 6.5 (4.0) None None WNW None 5.5 (3.4) None None NW None 5.9 (3.7) None None NNW None 6.8 (4.2) None None VI. Annotations to Previous AREOR Annotations to 2015 AREOR:

Page 24, section IV.C.3 Potable Water says, "Each sample consists of daily samples composited into a monthly sample." It should say, "Each sample consists of weekly samples composited into a monthly sample."

Page 63, Table B-2 for location 781 media sampled includes AIO, APT, and FPL which was incorrect. These samples were collected at location 782 which was omitted from Table B-2. Also, location 1682 includes FPL which was not sampled at that location.

Page 94, the first page of Table C-15, was inadvertently omitted. Table C-15 should have been three pages instead of the two included. The data not included was for locations 12C1, which was the control location, and 11A1, which was an indicator location. All three pages of the Table C-15 from the 2015 AREOR are included here.

TABLE C-15 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN SURFACE WATER, 2015 Results in Units of pCi/L +/- 2 Sigma COLLECTION <------------GAMMA EMITTERS------------>

SITE PERIOD 1-131

• K-40 Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 ZrNb-95 Cs-134 Cs-137 BaLa140 SA-SWA-12C1 (C) 01/06/15 < 0.4 61 +/- 25 < 2 < 2 <4 < 2 <4 < 2 < 2 <2 <4 02/04/15 < 0.6 80 +/- 26 < 2 < 2 <4 < 2 < 4 < 2 < 2 <2 < 5 03/04/15 < 0.8 < 43 <4 < 5 < 8 < 4 < 8 < 4 < 3 <4 < 7 04/09/15 < 0.4 < 18 < 2 <2 < 5 < 2 <4 < 2 < 2 <2 < 5 05/04/15 < 0.7 < 28 <2 < 2 < 5 <2 < 5 < 3 < 3 <2 <4 06/04/15 < 0.7 167 +/- 62 < 5 < 5 < 11 < 6 < 8 < 6 < 5 < 6 < 10 07/09/15 < 0.6 < 16 < 2 <2 <4 < 2 <4 <2 <2 < 2 <4 08/06/15 < 0.7 < 46 <4 <4 < 8 < 5 < 7 < 5 <4 < 4 < 5 09/11/15 < 0.6 73 +/- 28 < 2 < 2 <4 < 2 <4 < 2 <2 <2 < 4 10/06/15 < 0.7 167 +/- 64 < 6 < 4 < 9 < 6 < 8 < 6 <4 <4 < 9 11/02/15 < 0.8 < 26 < 3 < 3 < 8 < 0 < 4 < 3 <4 < 3 < 6 12/07/15 < 0.7 43 +/- 17 < 1 < 1 <2 < 1 < 2 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 2 AVERAGE** 99 +/- 109 SA-SWA-11A1 01/06/15 < 0.3 44 +/- 20 < 1 < 2 < 3 < 1 < 3 < 2 < 1 < 1 < 3 02/04/15 < 0.6 84 +/- 37 < 2 < 2 <4 < 2 < 3 < 2 <2 < 2 < 5 03/04/15 < 0.9 96 +/- 63 < 4 < 6 < 9 <4 < 7 < 4 <4 <5 <8 04/09/15 < 0.4 48 +/- 23 < 2 < 2 <4 < 1 < 3 < 2 <2 < 2 <3 05/04/15 < 0.9 77 +/- 35 < 3 < 3 < 6 < 3 < 5 < 3 < 2 <-3 < 6 06/04/15 < 0.4 < 54 < 5 < 6 < 12 < 7 < 10 < 6 < 5 < 6 < 10 07/09/15 < 0.8 < 17 < 2 < 2 <4 < 2 < 3 < 2 < 1 < 2 < 3 08/06/15 < 0.7 141 +/- 62 < 5 < 5 < 10 < 5 < 10 < 5 < 4 < 5 < 8 09/11/15 < 0.4 123 +/- 28 < 2 < 2 <4 <2 <4 < 2 < 2 < 2 <4 10/06/15 < 0.7 89 +/- 57 < 5 < 6 < 10 < 5 < 10 < 5 < 6 < 5 < 8 11/02/15 < 1.0 < 121 <4 < 3 < 7 <4 < 6 <4 < 3 <4 <4 12/07/15 < 0.6 83 +/- 17 < 1 < 1 <2 < 1 <2 < 1 < 1 < 1 <2 AVERAGE** 87 +/- 62

• IODINE-131 RESULTS ARE CORRECTED FOR DECAY TO STOP DATE OF COLLECTION AND ANALYZED TO AN LLD OF 1.0 pCi/L

• • THE AVERAGE AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES (C) CONTROL STATION TABLE C-15 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN SURFACE WATER, 2015 Results in Units of pCi/L +/- 2 Sigma COLLECTION <-----------GAMMA EMITTERS------------>

SITE PERIOD 1-131

• K-40 Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 ZrNb-95 Cs-134 Cs-137 BaLa140 SA-SWA-16F1 1/6/2015 < 0.4 35 +/- 22 < 1 < 1 < 3 < 1 <3 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 3 2/4/2015 < 0.5 62 +/- 39 < 2 < 2 < 5 < 2 <4 < 2 <2 < 2 <5 3/4/2015 < 0.8 90 +/- 56 < 3 <4 < 8 <4 < 8 < 4 <3 <4 < 4 04/09/15 < 0.3 < 15 < 2 < 2 < 4 < 2 < 3 < 2 < 1 <2 < 4 05/04/15 < 0.6 39 +/- 22 <2 < 2 <4 < 2 < 4 <2 <2 <2 < 5 06/04/15 < 0.4 < 62 < 6 < 6 < 13 < 5 < 12 < 6 < 6 < 6 < 10 07/09/15 < 0.6 44 +/- 27 < 2 <2 <4 <2 < 3 <2 <2 < 2 < 4 08/06/15 < 0.8 < 35 <4 < 4 < 9 < 4 < 8 < 5 <4 < 5 < 7 09/11/15 < 0.4 60 +/- 28 < 2 < 2 <4 < 2 <4 < 2 <2 < 2 < 4 10/06/15 < 0.7 < 67 < 5 < 5 < 11 <6 < 12 < 6 < 5 < 6 < 8 11/02/15 < 0.9 < 36 < 4 <4 < 6 <3 < 8 < 4 <4 < 4 < 6 12/07/15 < 0.6 41 +/- 13 < 1 < 1 < 2 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 2.

AVERAGE** 53 +/- 38 SA-SWA-1F2 1/6/2015 < 0.5 < 25 < 3 < 3 < 6 < 3 < 5 < 3 <2 < 3 < 6 2/4/2015 < 0.7 42 +/- 25 < 2 < 2 <4 < 2 < 3 < 2 < 1 <2 < 4 3/4/2015 < 0.6 < 33 < 4 < 5 < 8 < 5 < 8 < 5 <4 < 5 < 10 04/09/15 < 0.4 < 12 < 1 < 1 < 3 < 1 <2 < 1 < 1 < 1 <3 05/04/15 < 0.7 81 +/- 30 < 1 < 1 < 3 < 2 < 3 <2 < 1 < 1 < 4 06/04/15 < 0.4 < 35 < 4 < 4 < 10 <4 < 8 < 5 <4 <4 < 6 07/09/15 < 0.6 < 17 < 2 < 2 <4 <2 <4 < 2 < 2 < 2 < 4 08/06/15 < 0.7 < 23 <3 <4 < 9 < 3 < 6 <4 <4 <4 <6 09/11/15 < 0.5 < 24 < 2 < 2 < 6 < 2 < 5 <2 < 2 < 2 <6 10/06/15 < 0.9 < 46 < 4 < 5 < 8 < 3 < 12 < 5 < 5 < 6 <9 11/02/15 < 0.7 < 44 <4 <4 < 8 < 4 < 8 <4 <4 < 4 < 7 12/07/15 < 0.5 < 11 < 1 < 1 < 3 < 1 < 3 < 1 < 1 < 1 <3 AVERAGE** 61 +/- 56

• IODINE-131 RESULTS ARE CORRECTED FOR DECAY TO STOP DATE OF COLLECTION AND ANALYZED TO AN LLD OF 1.0 pCi/L

• • THE AVERAGE AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES TABLE C-15 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN SURFACE WATER, 2015 Results in Units of pCi/L +/- 2 Sigma COLLECTION <--------GAMMA EMITIERS---------->

SITE PERIOD 1-131* K-40 Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 ZrNb-95 Cs-134 Cs-137 BaLa140 SA-SWA-7E1 01/06/15 < 0.5 83 +/- 33 <2 <2 <5 <2 <4 <2 < 2 <2 < 5 02/04/15 < 0.6 104 +/- 28 <2 <2 <5 <2 <4 < 2 < 2 <2 <5 03/04/15 < 0.7 < 38 < 3 <4 < 7 < 3 < 6 < 4 < 4 <4 <6 04/09/15 < 0.4 93 +/- 31 <2 <2 < 5 < 2 <4 < 2 < 2 <2 < 5 05/04/15 < 0.7 91 +/- 59 < 3 < 3 < 6 < 3 <5 < 3 < 3 < 3 < 6 06/04/15 < 0.5 < 51 < 6 < 6 < 12 < 6 < 12 < 6 < 6 < 7 < 9 07/09/15 < 0.6 < 18 <2 <2 <4 <2 <4 < 2 <2 <2 <4 08/06/15 < 0.8 123 +/- 64 < 4 <4 < 7 < 4 < 8 < 5 <4 <4 < 8 09/11/15 < 0.5 147 +/- 35 < 2 < 2 <5 < 2 <4 < 2 < 2 <2 < 5 10/06/15 < 0.7 132 +/- 56 <4 < 3 < 8 < 4 < 9 < 4 <5 < 5 < 7 11/02/15 < 0.9 < 32 <4 < 4 <7 < 3 < 7 <4 <4 <4 < 8 12/07/15 < 0.5 110 +/- 15 < 1 < 1 <2 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 2 AVERAGE** 110 +/- 44

• IODINE-131 RESULTS ARE CORRECTED FOR DECAY TO STOP DATE OF COLLECTION AND ANALYZED TO AN LLD OF 1.0 pCi/L

• • THE AVERAGE AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES Annotations to 2014 AREOR:

Page 35, in the Section IV.E Land Use Survey, the summary table shows a vegetable garden located 7.3 Km South-West. The garden in that location did not have broadleaf vegetation so should not have been listed. No garden shoul_d be listed.

VII. Hope Creek Technical Specification Limit for Primary Water Iodine Concentration The HCGS primary coolant results for Dose Equivalent lodine-131, Total Gamma, and Total Beta were reviewed. The specific activity of the primary coolant did not exceed 0.2 microcuries per gram Dose Equivalent 1-131 (DEi). The Total Gamma and the Total Beta activity (microcuries per gram) did not exceed the 100/E-Bar limit.

Therefore, HCGS did not exceed the Technical Specifications limit specified in section 3.4.5.

VIII. Conclusions The Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program for the Site was conducted during 2016 in accordance with the Site ODCMs. The required sample analysis LLD values were achieved (See Appendix A and Appendix C) and the REMP objectives were met.

The data collected demonstrates that the Site was operated in compliance with the Site ODCMs' REMP requirements.

The concentration of radioactive material in the environment that could be attributable to Site operations was only a small fraction of the total radioactivity when compared to the concentration of naturally occurring and non-plant related man-made radioactivity in the environment.

Since these results were comparable to the results obtained during the preoperational phase of the program, which ran from 1973 to 1976, and with historical results collected since commercial operation, it can be concluded that the operation of the Site had no significant radiological impact on the health and safety of the public or on the environment.

IX. References

[1] Radiation Management Corporation. "Artificial Island Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program - Preoperation Summary - 1973 through 1976". RMC-TR-77-03, 1978.

[2] Public Service Enterprise Group. "Offsite Dose Calculation Manual" - Salem Generating Station. Revision 27.

[3] Public Service Enterprise Group. "Offsite Dose Calculation Manual" - Hope Creek Generating Station. Revision 27.

[4] U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission: NUREG-1301, "Offsite Dose Calculation Manual Guidance: Standard Radiological Effluent Controls for Pressurized Water Reactors", published April 1991.

[5] U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission: NUREG-1302, "Offsite Dose Calculation Manual Guidance: Standard Radiological Effluent Controls for Boiling Water Reactors", published April 1991.

[6] U.S. Atomic Energy Commission, Docket NOS. 50-272/50-311, "Salem Nuclear Generating Station Units 1 and 2, Environmental Report, Operating License Stage".

APPENDIX A RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

Intentionally left blank SAMPLE DESIGNATION Samples locations are identified by a three part code. 1) The first two letters are the program identification code. Because of the proximity of the SGS and HCGS, a common environmental surveillance program is conducted. The identification code, "SA", has been applied to SGS and HCGS. 2)The next three letters identify the media sampled.

AIO = Air Iodine IDM = Immersion Dose (TLD)

APT = Air Particulate MLK= Milk ECH = Hard Shell Blue Crab PWR = Potable Water (Raw)

ESF = Edible Fish PWT = Potable Water (Treated)

ESS = Sediment SOL= Soil FPL = Green Leaf Vegetables SWA =Surface Water FPV =Vegetables (Various) VGT =Fodder Crops (Various)

GAM = Game (Muskrat) WWA= Well Water

3) The last three or four symbols are a location code based on direction and distance from a standard reference point. The reference point is located at the midpoint between the center of the SGS Unit 1 and Unit 2 containments. Of these, the first one or two represent each of the sixteen angular sectors of 22.5 degrees centered about the reactor site. Sector one is divided evenly by the north axis and other sectors are numbered in a clockwise direction as follows:

1=N 5=E 9=S 13 =w 2= NNE 6 =ESE 10 =SSW 14=WNW 3 =NE 7 =SE 11 =SW 15= NW 4= ENE 8=SSE 12 =WSW 16= NNW The next digit is a letter which represents the radial distance from the reference point:

S = On-site location E = 4-5 miles off-site A = 0-1 miles off-site F = 5-10 miles off-site B = 1-2 miles off-site G = 10-20 miles off-site C = 2-3 miles off-site H = >20 miles off-site

. D = 3-4 miles off-site The last number is the location numerical designation within each sector and zone; e.g.

1,2,3, ... etc. For example, the designation SA-WWA-3E1 would indicate a sample in the SGS and HCGS program (SA) consisting of well water (WWA) which was collected in sector number 3, centered at 45 degrees (north east) with respect to the midpoint between SGS Units 1 and 2 Containments at a radial distance of 4 to 5 miles offsite, (therefore, radial distance E). The number 1 indicates that this is sampling location number 1 in that particular sector.

SAMPLING LOCATIONS All sampling locations and specific information about the individual locations are given in Appendix B, Table B-2. Additionally Maps B-1, B-2, and B-3 of Appendix B show the locations of sampling locations with respect to the Site. Not all locations in Table B-2 are required sample locations. Some of the locations identified in Table B-2 are used for management audit samples.

______ _ _ J

TABLE A-1 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

SALEM GENERATING STATION DOCKET NO. 50-272/-311 HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATION DOCKET NO. 50-354 SALEM COUNTY, NEW JERSEY REPORTING PERIOD: January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2016

' . N~~~~R oF\f;5

'**l'ioNRtiUTINEz'l

. '.:. REPORTifo ; ..

• MEASUREMENTS AIR PARTICULATE Gr-B 10 12 (3731378) SA-APT-14G1 (C) 13 (52154) 13 (52154) 0 (E-3 pCVm 3 ) (4126) 11.8 MILES WNW (5123) (5123)

GAMMA Be-7 NIA 118 (28128) SA-APT-14G1 (C) 125 (414) 125 (414) 0 (851186) 11.8 MILES WNW (1041168) (1041168)

K-40 NIA <MDC NIA NIA <MDC 0 Cs-134 50 <MDC NIA NIA <MDC 0 Cs-137 60 NIA NIA <MDC 0 AIR IODINE GAMMA (E-3 pCVm 3 ) 1-131 70 <MDC NIA NIA <MDC 0

)! ..DIRECT <>: .. ..

DIRECT RADIATION TLD-QUARTERL Y NIA 13.3 (2071207) SA-IDM-16S2 29.1 (414) 13.1 (24124) 0 (mR/standard quarter) (7.5131.8) 0.60 MILES NNW (28.2131.3) (10.1115.2)

Ill. TERRESTRIAL ... ..**. . .

• MILK 1-131 (LOW LVL) <MDC NIA NIA <MDC 0 (pCllL)

GAMMA K-40 NIA 1,365 (60160) SA-MLK-14F4 1,395 (20120) 1,336 (20120) 0 (1, 10211,644) 8.0 MILES WNW (1, 13811,627) (1, 12911,683)

Cs-134 15 <MDC NIA NIA <MDC 0 Cs-137 18 <MDC NIA NIA <MDC 0 BaLa-140 15 <MDC NIA NIA <MDC 0 Ra-226 NIA <MDC NIA NIA <MDC 0 WELL WATER Gr-A 3 <MDC NIA NIA NIA 0 (pCVL)

Gr-B 4 3.2 (4112) SA-WWA-3E1 3.2 (4112) NIA 0 (2.813.8) 4.2 MILES NE (2.813.8)

H-3 200 <MDC NIA NIA NIA 0 TABLE A-1 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

SALEM GENERATING STATION DOCKET NO. 50-272/-311 HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATION DOCKET NO. 50-354 SALEM COUNTY, NEW JERSEY REPORTING PERIOD: January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2016 WELL WATER (cont.) 1-131 (LOW LVL) 11 <MDC N/A NIA NIA 0 (pCVL)

GAMMA 11 K-40 NIA 122 (1/12) SA-WWA-3E1 122 (1112) NIA 0 4.2 MILES NE Mn-54 15 <MDC NIA NIA NIA 0 Co-58 15 <MDC NIA NIA NIA 0 Fe-59 30 <MDC NIA NIA NIA 0 Co-60 15 <MDC NIA NIA NIA 0 Zn-65 30 <MDC NIA NIA NIA 0 ZrNb-95 15 <MDC NIA NIA NIA 0 Cs-134 15 <MDC NIA NIA NIA 0 Cs-137 18 <MDC NIA NIA NIA 0 BaLa-140 15 <MDC NIA N/A NIA 0 Ra-226 NIA <MDC NIA NIA NIA 0 POTABLE WATER (RAW) Gr-A 11 3 <MDC NIA NIA NIA 0 (pCVL)

Gr-B 11 4 5.4 (10/12) SA-PWR-2F3 5.4 (10112) NIA 0 (3.517.0) 8.0 MILES NNE (3.517.0)

H-3 11 200 <MDC NIA NIA NIA 0 1-131 (LOW LVL) 11 <MDC NIA NIA NIA 0 GAMMA 11 K-40 NIA <MDC NIA NIA NIA 0 Mn-54 15 <MDC NIA NIA NIA 0 Co-58 15 <MDC NIA NIA NIA 0 Fe-59 30 <MDC NIA NIA NIA 0 L ______________________________________

TABLE A-1 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

SALEM GENERATING STATION DOCKET NO. 50-272/-311 HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATION DOCKET NO. 50-354 SALEM COUNTY, NEW JERSEY REPORTING PERIOD: January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2016

• . LO\,\l,E~LIM;T !;;,Al.L)NDICATORLClcATl()NS*Y *;i:';. LOCATION.WITH HIGHEST MEAN <4£>'. \ CONTROL L.ocAftQtf..  ;

. .. /*'

NUMBE.R OF ./.j MEAN (f) *~

• - NONROUTINE .. *i

r**~=AN'~~~,J~i~t*

• • . ** .*  : -,;:;. NAME MEAN (f) ** .** .:

DETECT.ION DIST,A.NC<E AND DJRECJltlN (RANGE) (_ *.* RE_PORTEQ;:, , *:

POTABLE WATER (RAW) Co-60 (LLp!)

15

{ ... (RANGE)

<MDC NIA NIA NIA

<* *.: . MEAS.UREMEN~ji 0

(cont.) (pCl/L)

Zn-65 30 <MDC NIA NIA NIA 0 ZrNb-95 15 <MDC NIA NIA NIA 0 Cs-134 15 <MDC NIA NIA NIA 0 Cs-137 18 <MDC NIA NIA NIA 0 BaLa-140 15 <MDC NIA NIA NIA 0 Ra-226 NIA <MDC NIA NIA NIA 0 POTABLE WATER (TREATED) Gr-A 3 <MDC NIA NIA NIA 0 (pCl/L)

Gr-B 4 6.0 (12112) SA-PWT-2F3 6.0 (12112) NIA 0 (5.217.2) 8.0 MILES NNE (5.217.2)

H-3 200 <MDC NIA NIA NIA 0 1-131 (LOW LVL) <MDC NIA NIA NIA 0 GAMMA K-40 NIA <MDC NIA NIA NIA 0 Mn-54 15 <MDC NIA NIA NIA 0 Co-58 15 <MDC NIA NIA NIA 0 Fe-59 30 <MDC NIA NIA NIA 0 Co-60 15 <MDC NIA NIA NIA 0 Zn-65 30 <MDC NIA NIA NIA 0 ZrNb-95 15 <MDC NIA NIA NIA 0 Cs-134 15 <MDC NIA NIA NIA 0 Cs-137 18 <MDC NIA NIA NIA 0 BaLa-140 15 <MDC NIA NIA NIA 0 TABLE A-1 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

SALEM GENERATING STATION DOCKET NO. 50-272/-311 HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATION DOCKET NO. 50-354 SALEM COUNTY, NEW JERSEY REPORTING PERIOD: January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2016

¢6NTRObLOCA~ION .~. *. NUMBER OF **

MEAN(f) .. MEAN (f) ** 1.11{ > * >. NONROL)TlNE (RANGE) .(FMNGe). '".:::~> '  :/* REPORTED

• ~< ' )~EASUREMENTS POTABLE WATER (TREATED) Ra-226 NIA <MDC NIA NIA NIA 0 (cont.) loCilU BROAD-LEAF VEGETATION, GAMMA FPL (pCilkg wet) Be-7 NIA 525 (6/61) SA-FPL-10D1 1,694 (1110) <MDC 0 (20411,694) 3.9 MILES SSW K-40 NIA 4,052 (61/61) SA-FPL-7S2 5,862 (11111) 2,096 (212) 0 (1, 77218,761) 0. 12 MILES SE (4, 13018, 761) (1,55712,634) 1-131 60 <MDC N/A NIA <MDC 0 Cs-134 60 <MDC N/A NIA <MDC 0 Cs-137 80 <MDC NIA NIA <MDC 0 Ra-226 N/A <MDC NIA NIA <MDC 0 Th-232 NIA <MDC NIA NIA <MDC 0 VEGETABLES,FPV GAMMA (pCVkg wet) Be-7 N/A <MDC NIA NIA NIA 0 K-40 NIA 2,425 (21/21) SA-FPV-14F4 14,270 (111) NIA 0 (923114,270) 8.0 MILES WNW 1-131 60 <MDC NIA NIA NIA 0 Cs-134 60 <MDC N/A NIA NIA 0 Cs-137 80 <MDC N/A NIA NIA 0 Ra-226 NIA <MDC NIA NIA NIA 0 Th-232 NIA <MDC NIA NIA NIA 0 FODDER CROPS GAMMA (pCVkg wet) Be-7 NIA 293 (1/3) SA-VGT-3G1 (C) 308 (111) 308 (111) 0 17.0 MILES NE K-40 N/A 3,196 (3/3) SA-VGT-3G1 (C) 3,565 (111) 3,565 (111) 0 (2,98313,478) 17.0 MILES NE 1-131 60 <MDC N/A NIA <MDC 0 TABLE A-1 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

SALEM GENERATING STATION DOCKET NO. 50-272/-311 HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATION DOCKET NO. 50-354 SALEM COUNTY, NEW JERSEY REPORTING PERIOD: January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2016

• :NU~BERdF \Fj.

/ *.

• MEAN(!)*~**.. * / f.mNROUTINE*.*Y******

(RAN~~f > . *REPORTED f}*,

,'.,?<.; /\' *. MEt~UREME~~~1l FODDER CROPS (cont.) Cs-134 60 <MDC NIA NIA <MDC 0 (pCl/kg wet)

Cs-137 80 <MDC NIA NIA <MDC 0 Ra-226 NIA <MDC NIA NIA <MDC 0 Th-232 NIA <MDC NIA NIA <MDC 0 SOIL GAMMA (pCilkg dry) Be-7 NIA <MDC NIA NIA NIA 0 K-40 NIA 10.393 (919) SA-SOL-13E3 16,980 (111) NIA 0 (6, 844116, 980) 5.0 MILESW Cs-134 150 <MDC NIA NIA N/A 0 Cs-137 180 259 (219) SA-SOL-14F4 344 (111) NIA 0 (173/344) 8.0 MILES WNW Ra-226 NIA 2,262 (319) SA-SOL-10D1 2,750 (111) NIA 0 (1, 49912,750) 3.9 MILES SSW Th-232 NIA 644 (919) SA-SOL-10D1 935 (111) NIA 0 (3581935) 3.9 MILES SSW GAME GAMMA 2 (pCl/kg wet) Be-7 NIA <MDC NIA NIA NIA 0 K-40 NIA 2,791 (212) SA-GAM-13E3 2,855 (111) NIA 0 (2, 72712,855) 5.0MILESW 1-131 60 <MDC NIA NIA NIA 0 Cs-134 60 <MDC NIA NIA NIA 0 Cs-137 BO <MDC NIA NIA NIA 0 SURFACE WATER H-3 §Q 200 2,070 (2148) SA-SWA-11A1 2,070 (2148) <MDC 0 (pCl/L) (1,60012,540) 0.2MILESSW (1,60012,540) 1-131 (LOW LVL) §Q <MDC NIA NIA <MDC 0 GAMMA §Q K-40 NIA 124 (17148) SA-SWA-11A1 135 (4112) 129 (6112) 0 (781168) 0.2 MILES SW (851168) (661253)

TABLE A-1 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

SALEM GENERATING STATION DOCKET NO. 50-272/-311 HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATION DOCKET NO. 50-354 SALEM COUNTY, NEW JERSEY REPORTING PERIOD: January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2016

• • . ~pcAfioN*WITH fflGH~sT MEAN r; *.* ~9.'?N~~Ot<LoCATION J ':~UM~~R b~/*;

. '.<'.NAME .

• MEAN (f) .. I< .* . MEAN (!)" ,;; . NONR~.UTINE

'DlSTAN~~Aff.fj:f:CTION (RANGE) <** *>:)RANGE) ,, ~) ME~;~~~~:Ts SURFACE WATER (cont.) Mn-54 15 <MDC NIA NIA <MDC 0 (pCl/L)

Co-58 15 <MDC NIA NIA <MDC 0 Fe-59 30 <MDC NIA NIA <MDC 0 Co-60 15 <MDC NIA NIA <MDC 0 Zn-65 30 <MDC NIA NIA <MDC 0 ZrNb-95 15 <MDC NIA NIA <MDC 0 Cs-134 15 <MDC NIA NIA <MDC 0 Cs-137 18 <MDC NIA NIA <MDC 0 BaLa-140 15 <MDC NIA NIA <MDC 0 FISH GAMMA 1Q (pCl/kg wet) K-40 N/A 3,871 (6/6) SA-ESF-12C1 (C) 4,209 (4/4) 4,209 (414) 0 (3,32514,668) 2.5 MILES WSW (3,53114,534) (3,53114,534)

Mn-54 130 <MDC NIA NIA <MDC 0 Co-58 130 <MDC NIA NIA <MDC 0 Fe-59 260 <MDC NIA NIA <MDC 0 Co-60 130 <MDC NIA NIA <MDC 0 Zn-65 260 <MDC NIA NIA <MDC 0 Cs-134 130 <MDC NIA N/A <MDC 0 Cs-137 150 <MDC NIA NIA <MDC 0 Ra-226 NIA <MDC NIA NIA <MDC 0 BLUE CRABS GAMMA (pCl/kg wet) K-40 NIA 3,028 (212) SA-ECH-11A1 3,028 (2/2) 2,721 (2/2) 0 (2,83213,223) 0.2 MILES SW (2, 83213, 223) (2, 20313, 238)

Mn-54 130 <MDC NIA NIA <MDC 0 L

TABLE A-1 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

SALEM GENERATING STATION DOCKET NO. 50-272/-311 HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATION DOCKET NO. 50-354 SALEM COUNTY, NEW JERSEY REPORTING PERIOD: January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2016

.'* ',' "V:-/'}i'.'1 NUMBER oF*:r,  !

M~AN (tr '9; NONROUTINE : '

<rkANGE) ,' . ..~Ef,'.O~TED r*:J

< . *.:* *. *. * \; __ ,.* . MEA$~REMENTS'j BLUE CRABS (cont) Co-58 130 <MDC NIA NIA <MDC 0 (pCVkg wet)

Fe-59 260 <MDC NIA NIA <MDC 0 Co-60 130 <MDC NIA NIA <MDC 0 Zn-65 260 <MDC NIA NIA <MDC 0 Cs-134 130 <MDC NIA NIA <MDC 0 Cs-137 150 <MDC NIA NIA <MDC 0 Ra-226 NIA <MDC NIA NIA <MDC 0 SEDIMENT GAMMA H (pCVkg dry) Be-7 NIA <MDC NIA NIA <MDC 0 K-40 NIA 8,081 (12/12) SA-ESS-12C1 (C) 16,215 (2/2) 16,215 (212) 0 (2.365116.410) 2.5 MILES WSW (15,620116,810) (15,620116,810)

Cs-134 150 <MDC NIA NIA <MDC 0 Cs-137 180 <MDC NIA N/A <MDC 0 Ra-226 NIA 2,120 (3/12) SA-ESS-16A1 3,012 (112) 2,513 (1/2) 0 (1,46513,012) 0.24 MILES NNW Th-232 NIA 697 (9/12) SA-ESS-12C1 (C) 1,134 (2/2) 1,134 (212) 0 (22711,002) 2.5 MILES WSW (96511,303) (96511,303)

OYSTERS (EDY) GAMMA .1 (pCVkg wet) K-40 N/A 1,485 (1/2) SA-EOY-7H1 1,568 (1/2) 1,568 (112) 0 (1,48511,568) 19 MILES SE Mn-54 130 <MDC N/A NIA <MDC 0 Co-58 130 <MDC N/A NIA <MDC 0 Fe-59 260 <MDC NIA N/A <MDC 0 Co-60 130 <MDC NIA N/A <MDC 0 Zn-65 260 <MDC NIA NIA <MDC 0 TABLE A-1 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

SALEM GENERATING STATION DOCKET NO. 50-272/-311 HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATION DOCKET NO. 50-354 SALEM COUNTY, NEW JERSEY REPORTING PERIOD: January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2016

~v-" ..z:,:. ~f OOV~ ~I

~('- :{:*:~~~~t~~6 1****

v 0 1... 'Meoiur.iforiiiATHWAY.

• I * !i SAMPLED ,: "l:NuMsf!iKofX-

!. ~-~?c(UNtT Of MEAsUREMENTJ . '.A~.S~~iS.PERFORMED

./~'~<<:~,~~J~~h.: 'Y;r',' ," /\_.;,,

OYSTERS (EOY) (cont.) Cs-134 0 (pCi/kg wet)

Cs-137 150 <MDC N/A NIA <MDC 0

• The LLD listed is the Lower Limit of Detection, which was requested by PSEG to be achieved.

• • Mean was calculated using values above the MDC only. f = the fraction of measurements above the MDC.

=

(C) Control Location N/A = Not Applicable APPENDIX B SAMPLE DESIGNATION AND LOCATIONS Intentionally left blank TABLE 8-1 SALEM AND HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATIONS' RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM (Program Overview)

SAMPLING AND EXPOSURE PATHWAY NUMBER OF REPRESENTATIVE SAMPLES AND COLLECTION TYPE/FREQUENCY OF AND/OR SAMPLE SAMPLE LOCATIONS FREQUENCY ANALYSIS

1. DIRECT RADIATION Fifty-eight routine monitoring locations with two or Quarterly Gamma dose I quarterly more dosimeters placed as follows:

a. Dosimeters An inner ring of locations, one in each land based (IDM) meteorological sector in the general area of the SITE BOUNDARY.

An outer ring of locations, one in each land based meteorological sector in the 5 to 11 km (3.1 - 6.8 miles) range from the site; and The balance of the locations placed in areas of special interest such as population centers, nearby residences, and schools and in six areas beyond 10 miles to serve as control locations.

TAB LE B-1 (cont'd) .

SALEM AND HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATIONS' RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM SAMPLING AND EXPOSURE PATHWAY NUMBER OF REPRESENTATIVE SAMPLES AND COLLECTION TYPE/FREQUENCY OF AND/OR SAMPLE SAMPLE LOCATIONS FREQUENCY ANALYSIS

2. ATMOSPHERIC

a. Air Particulate 3 samples from close to the Site Boundary: 5S1, 7S2, Continuous sampler Gross Beta I weekly (APT) 15S2. operation with sample Gamma isotopic analysis I One duplicate sample from close to the site boundary: collection weekly or more quarterly composite*

5S2. frequently if required by dust loading 3 Samples in different land based sectors: 1F1, 2F6, 501.

1 Sample from the vicinity of a community having a highest lodine-131 I weekly

b. Air Iodine annual average ground level D/Q: 16E1.

(AIO) 1 Sample from a control location; for example 15 - 30 km distant (9.3 - 18.6 miles) and in the least prevalent wind direction: 14G1.

3. TERRESTRIAL

a. Milk Samples from milking animals in 3 locations within 5 km Semi-monthly Gamma scan I semi-monthly (MLK) distance (3.1 miles) having the highest dose potential. If (when animals are on lodine-131 I semi-monthly there are none, then 1 sample from milking animals in pasture) each of 3 areas between 5 - 8 km distant (3.1 - 5.0 miles) where doses are calculated to be greater than 1 mrem per Gamma scan I monthly Monthly yr: 13E3, 14F4, 2G3< 1l. lodine-131 I monthly (when animals are not on 1 Sample from milking animals at a control location 15 - 30 pasture) km distant (9.3 - 18.6 miles): 3G1.

TABLE 8-1 (cont'd)

SALEM AND HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATIONS' RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM SAMPLING AND EXPOSURE PATHWAY NUMBER OF REPRESENTATIVE SAMPLES AND COLLECTION TYPE/FREQUENCY OF AND/OR SAMPLE SAMPLE LOCATIONS FREQUENCY ANALYSIS

b. Well Water (Ground) Although wells in the vicinity of SGS/HCGS are not directly Monthly Gamma scan I monthly affected by plant operations so sampling is not required by Gross alpha I monthly (WWA)

SGS/HCGS ODCM, samples of 3E1 farm's well are Gross beta I monthly collected as management audit samples. Tritium I monthly

c. Potable Water (Drinking Although no potable water samples are required as liquid Monthly (composited Gross alpha I monthly Water) effluents discharged from SGS/HCGS do not directly affect weekly) Gross beta I monthly (PWR, PWT) this pathway and it is not required by SGS/HCGS ODCM, Tritium I monthly one raw and one treated water sample from a public water*

supply (City of Salem Water and Sewer Department) are Gamma scan I monthly collected: 2F3 as management audit samples. lodine-131 I monthly

d. Vegetables Although the Delaware River at the location of SGS/HCGS Monthly (during growing Gamma scan I on collection (FPL, FPV) is a brackish water source and is not used for irrigation of season) food products and so sampling is not required by SGS/HCGS ODCM, samples of vegetables are collected as management audit samples from various locations during harvest. In addition, broad leaf vegetation is collected from various offsite locations as well as being planted & collected onsite (1 S1, 7S2, 15S2, 16S1 ). This is in lieu of having a milk farm within 5 km (3.1 miles) of the Site< 1l.

TABLE 8-1 (cont'd)

SALEM AND HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATIONS' RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM SAMPLING AND EXPOSURE PATHWAY NUMBER OF REPRESENTATIVE SAMPLES AND COLLECTION TYPE/FREQUENCY OF AND/OR SAMPLE SAMPLE LOCATIONS FREQUENCY ANALYSIS

e. Fodder Crops Although not required by SGS/HCGS ODCM, samples of Annually (at harvest) Gamma scan I on collection crops normally used as cattle feed (silage) were collected (VGT) from milk farms as management audit samples: 14F4, 3G1, 2G3, 13E3 ..

f. Soil Although not required by SGS/HCGS ODCM, samples of Every 3 years Gamma scan I on (SOL) soil are collected as management audit samples. (2010-2013-2016) collection

4. AQUATIC ENVIRONMENT Gamma scan I monthly Semi-Monthly

a. Surface Water One sample upstream: 1F2. Tritium I monthly**

One sample downstream: 7E1.

(SWA) One sample outfall: 11A1.

One sample cross-stream (mouth of Appoquinimink River):

12c1<2 l.

And an additional location in the Chesapeake & Delaware Canal: 16F1.

b. Edible Fish One sample of each commercially and recreationally Semi- Gamma scan (flesh) I on important species in vicinity of plant discharge area: 11A1. annually collection (ESF)

One sample of same species in area not influenced by plant discharge: 12C1 <2 l, and an additional location downstream:

7E1.

TABLE B-1 (cont'd)

SALEM AND HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATIONS' RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM SAMPLING AND EXPOSURE PATHWAY NUMBER OF REPRESENTATIVE SAMPLES AND COLLECTION TYPE/FREQUENCY OF AND/OR SAMPLE SAMPLE LOCATIONS FREQUENCY ANALYSIS

c. Blue Crabs One sample of each commercially and recreationally Semi-annually Gamma scan (flesh) /on important species in vicinity of plant discharge area 11A1. collection (ECH)

One sample of same species in area not influenced by plant discharge 12c1<2>.

d. Sediment One sample from downstream area: 7E1. Semi-annually Gamma scan I on collection (ESS) One sample from cross-stream area and control location:

12c1<2 >.

One sample from outfall area: 11A1.

One sample from upstream, the C & D Canal: 16F1.

One sample from shoreline area: 6S2.

One sample from Cooling Tower Slowdown discharge: 15A1.

One sample south storm drain discharge line: 16A1.

TABLE B-1 (cont'd)

SALEM AND HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATIONS' RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM SAMPLING AND EXPOSURE PATHWAY NUMBER OF REPRESENTATIVE SAMPLES AND COLLECTION TYPE/FREQUENCY OF AND/OR SAMPLE SAMPLE LOCATIONS FREQUENCY ANALYSIS

e. Oysters(3l One sample near plant discharge area (Hope Creek Oyster Twice per year, once near Gamma scan (flesh and (EOY) Bed Area, approximately 2 miles SE of Site) as a . start and once near end of liquids) I on collection management audit sample ( 7C1 ) NJ harvest season One sample in area not influenced by plant discharge (Bennies Oyster Beds Area, approximately 19 miles _SE of Site) as a management audit sample ( 7H1 )

• Except for Passiv_e Dosimeters, the quarterly analysis is performed on a composite of individual samples collected during the quarter.

• • Technical Specifications and ODCM require quarterly analysis but it was decided to analyze surface waters on a monthly basis for tritium as a program enhancement.

(1) While these milk.locations are not within the 5 km range, they are the closest farms in the Site vicinity.

Since broad leaf vegetation is acceptable in lieu of milk collections, gardens were planted and harvested at four locations on Site (1S1, 7S2, 15S2, 16S1) and one in Delaware (10D1).

(2) Location 12C1 was made the operational control (1975) for aquatic samples since the physical characteristics of this location more closely resemble those of the outfall area than do those at the upstream location originally chosen. This is due to the distance from Liston Point, which is the boundary between the Delaware River and Delaware Bay. As discussed extensively in the SGS/HCGS Pre-operational reports, the sampling locations further upstream show significantly lower background levels due to tidal flow.

(3) Oysters were added to the REMP as a management audit sample in 2015. The oysters from the indicator location (7C1) are impacted by bacteria and are considered too small to be sold to the public. The oyster sample locations are not listed in the ODCM.

TABLE 8-2 SAMPLING LOCATIONS Specific information about the individual sampling locations are given in Table B-1. Maps B-1, B-2, and B-3 show the locations of sampling locations with respect to the Site. A Portable Global Positioning System (GPS) was used to provide the coordinates of sampling locations.

All sample types are not required to be collected at all possible sites every year.

LOCATION LATITUDINAL LONGITUDINAL MEDIA SAMPLED CODE STATION LOCATION DEG. MIN. DEG. MIN.

1S1 0.55 mi. N side of road near ISFSI pad. 39-28.260 75-32.222 IDM, FPL 2S2 0.40 mi. NNE; lamp pole 65 near HC switch yard 39-28.98 75 -32.10 IDM 2S4 0.60 mi. NNE; in the equipment laydown area 39 -28.110 75 -31.992 IDM 3S1 0.58 mi. NE; behind refrigeration building 39-28.140 75 - 31.678 IDM 4S1 0.60 mi. ENE; site access road near intersection to 39-28.023 75 - 31.544 IDM TB-02 5S1 0.86 mi. E; site access road 39-27.668 75-31.187 IDM, AIO, APT 5S2 0.86 mi. E; site access road, duplicate sample 39-27.668 75-31.187 AIO, APT 6S2 0.23mi.. ESE; area around helicopter pad 39 - 27.719 75-31.912 IDM, ESS 7S1 0.14 mi. SE; station personnel gate 39 - 27.701 75-32.05 IDM 7S2 0.12 mi. SE; station personnel gate 39-27.720 75 - 32.15 AIO, APT, FPL, SOL 8S1 0.12 mi. SSE; fuel oil storage 39-27.676 75-32.055 IDM 9S1 0.12 mi. S; fuel oil storage 39-27.636 75 -32.091 IDM 10S1 0.14 mi. SSW; circulating water building 39-27.700 75 -32.160 IDM 11S1 0.09 mi. SW; circulating water building 39 - 27.719 75-32.225 IDM 12S1 0.09 mi. WSW; outside security fence 39-27.756 75-32.236 IDM 13S1 0.09 mi. W; outside security fence 39-27.801 75-32.267 IDM 14S1 0.10 mi. NNW; outside security fence 39 -27.893 75-32.280 IDM 15S1 0.57 mi. NW; near river and HCGS barge slip 39-28.161 75-32.525 IDM 15S2 0.59 mi. NW; near river and HCGS barge slip 39 -28.12 75-32.32 IDM, AIO, APT, FPL 16S1 0.57 mi. NNW; on road near fuel oil storage tank 39 - 28.215 75 - 32.432 IDM, FPL 16S2 0.60 mi. NNW; near security firing range 39 -28.16 75-32.17 IDM 1683 1.0 mi. NNW; consolidated spoils facility 39 -28.350 75-32.550 IDM 11A1 0.20 mi. SW; SGS outfall area 39-27.59 75-32.25 ESS, SWA, ECH, ESF 11A1A 0.15 mi. SE; Located in the plant barge slip area 39-27.41 75-32.02 Alternate SWA TABLE B-2 (cont'd)

SAMPLING LOCATIONS All sample types are not required to be collected at all possible sites every year.

LOCATION LATITUDINAL LONGITUDINAL MEDIA SAMPLED CODE STATION LOCATION DEG. MIN. DEG. MIN.

15A1 0.65 mi. NW; HCGS outfall area 39-27.67 75 -32;19 ESS 16A1 0.24 mi. NNW; South Storm Drain outfall 39-28.24 75-32.58 ESS 12C1 2.5 mi. WSW; West bank of Delaware River 39-27.22 75-34.08 ESS, SWA, ECH, ESF 12C1A 3.7 mi. WSW; Located at the tip of Augustine Beach 39- 30.17 75 - 34.48 Alternate SWA Boat Ramp 4D2 3.7 mi. ENE; Alloway Creek Neck Road 39-29.292 75-28.175 IDM 5D1 3.5 mi. E; local farm along SGS/HCGS access road. 39-28.396 75-28.334 IDM, AIO, APT 10D1 3.9 mi. SSW; Taylor's Bridge Spur, DE 39-24:613 75-33.733 IDM, FPL, SOL 14D1 3.4 mi. WNW; Bay View, DE 39-29.26 75 -35.521 IDM 15D1 3.8 mi NW; Route 9, Augustine Beach, DE 39 - 30.125 75-35.28 IDM 2E1 4.4 mi. NNE; local farm, NJ 39-31.380 75 -30.428 IDM 3E1 4.2 mi. NE; local farm, NJ 39-30.098 75-28.646 IDM, WWA, GAM 7E1 4.5 mi. SE; River Bank 1.0 mi. W of Mad Horse Creek 39-25.08 75-28.64 ESS, SWA, ESF 7E1A 8.9 mi. SE; Located at the end of Bayside Road, NJ 39-22.57 75-24.24 Alternate SWA 11E2 5.0 mi. SW; Route 9, DE 39-24.328 75-35.546 IDM 12E1 4.4 mi. WSW; Thomas Landing, DE 39-26.862 75-36.968 IDM 13E1 4.2 mi. W; Diehl House Lab, DE 39-27.989 75-36.735 IDM 13E3 5.0 mi. W; local farm, DE 39-27.17 75-37.30 MLK, VGT, SOL, GAM 16E1 4.1 mi. NNW; Port Penn, DE 39-30.762 75-34.580 IDM, AIO, APT, SOL 1F1 5.8 mi. N; Fort Elfsborg, NJ 39-32.693 75 - 31.124 IDM, AIO, APT 1F2 7.1 mi. N; midpoint of Delaware River 39-33.08 75-32.54 SWA 2F2 8.5 mi. NNE; Salem Substation, Salem NJ 39-34.522 75 - 28.120 IDM 2F3 8.0 mi. NNE; City of Salem Water and Sewage 39 -33.40 75-27.18 PWR, PWT Department, NJ 2F5 7.4 mi. NNE; Salem High School, Salem, NJ 39 -33.448 75-28.514 IDM 2F6 7.3 mi. NNE; PSE&G Training Center, Salem NJ 39-33.713 75-28.819 IDM, AIO, APT 2F9 7.5 mi. NNE; Local Farm, Tilbury Rd, Salem, NJ 39-33.55 75--29.30 FPV, SOL L

TABLE B-2 (cont'd)

SAMPLING LOCATIONS All sample types are not required to be collected at all possible sites every year.

LOCATION LATITUDINAL LONGITUDINAL MEDIA SAMPLED CODE STATION LOCATION DEG. MIN. DEG. MIN.

3F2 5.1 mi. NE; Hancocks Bridge, NJ Munc Bldg 39 - 30.410 75-27.578 IDM 3F3 8.6 mi. NE; Quinton Township Elem. School* NJ 39 -32.616 75- 24.735 IDM 3F8 9.3 mi. NE; Circle M Orchard, NJ 39-33.987 75 -25.468 FPV 4F2 6.0 mi. ENE; Mays Lane, Harmersville, NJ 39-29.953 75-26.076 IDM 5F1 6.5 mi. E; Canton, NJ 39-28.360 75 -25.031 IDM,SOL 6F1 6.4 mi. ESE; Stow Neck Road, NJ 39-26.396 75 - 25.148 IDM 7F2 9.1 mi. SE; Bayside, NJ 39 - 22.971 75 - 24.261 IDM 8F1 9.7 mi. SE; Woodland Beach, DE 39 -19.933 75 - 28.463 IDM 9F1 5.3 mi. S; off Route #9, DE 39-23.042 75-32.95 IDM 10F2 5.8 mi. SSW; Route #9, DE 39-23.034 75-34.152 IDM 11 F1 6.2 mi. SW; Taylor's Bridge, DE 39-24.766 75 -37.632 IDM 12F1 9.4 mi. WSW; Townsend Elementary School, DE 39 -23.778 75-41.311 IDM 13F2 6.5 mi W; Odessa, DE 39-27.297 75-39.372 IDM 13F3 9.3 mi. W; Redding Middle School, Middletown, DE 39 - 27.215 75-42.543 IDM 13F4 9.8 mi. W; Middletown, DE 39-26.857 75 -43.111 IDM 14F2 6.7 mi. WNW; Route 13 and Boyds Corner Rd, DE 39-29.979 75-39.042 IDM 14F4 8.0 mi. WNW; local farm, DE 39 - 30.44 75-40.52 MLK, VGT, SOL, FPV 15F3 5.4 mi. NW, Port Penn Rd. at Pole Bridge Rd., DE 39 -30.987 75 -36.586 IDM 15F4 7.0 mi. NW; local farm; Port Penn Road; DE 39 - 31.21 75 - 38.31 FPV 16F1 6.9 mi. NNW; C&D Canal, DE 39-33.55 75-34.25 ESS, SWA .

16F1A 6.8 mi. NNW; Located at the C&D Canal Tip, DE 39-33.34 75-33.56 Alternate SWA TABLE B-2 (cont'd)

SAMPLING LOCATIONS All sample types are not required to be collected at all possible sites every year.

LOCATION LATITUDINAL LONGITUDINAL MEDIA SAMPLED CODE STATION LOCATION DEG. MIN. DEG. MIN.

16F2 8.1 mi. NNW; Delaware City Public School, DE 39-34.314 75 - 35.429 IDM 1G1 10.9 mi. NNE; Route 49, South Broadway, NJ 39-37.113 75 -30.178 FPV,FPL 1G3 19 mi. N; N. Church Street Wilmington, DE 39-44.287 75 - 32.512 IDM 2G2 13.5 mi. NNE; Local Farm; Pointers Auburn Road 39 -38.19 75-26.10 FPV (Route 540), Salem, NJ 2G3 11.8 mi. NNE; Local Milk Farm, NJ 39 -36.21 75-24.53 MLK, VGT, SOL 3G1 17 mi. NE; local farm, NJ 39 - 35.913 75-16.804 IDM, MLK, VGT, SOL 10G1 12 mi. SSW; Smyrna, DE 39 -18.223 75-36.095 IDM 14G1 11.8 mi. WNW; Route 286, Bethel Church Road, DE 39-31.290 75 -46.495 AIO,APT,IDM 16G1 15 mi. NNW; Wilmington Airport, DE 39-40.637 75-35.570 IDM 3H1 32 mi. NE; National Park, NJ 39 - 51.599 75 -11.96 IDM 3H5 25 mi. NE; Farm Market, Route 77, NJ 39 - 41.040 75 -12.380 FPV,FPL 7C1* 2 mi SE; Hope Creek Bed, near mouth of Hope 39 -26.611 75-30.328 EOY Creek 7H1* 19 mi SE; Bennies Oyster Bed, near Nantuxent 39 -15.500 75-17.500 EOY Cove NOTE: All locations are referenced to the midpoint of the two SGS Units' Containments. The coordinates of this location are: Latitude N 39° - 27'

- 46.5" and Longitude W 75° - 32' -10.6".

Vegetable samples are not always collected in consecutive years from the same farmer due to crop rotation.

• Oysters were added as a management aud.it sample in 2015. The oysters from the indicator location (7C1) are impacted by bacteria and are considered too small to be sold to the public. The oyster sample locations are not listed in the ODCM.

MAP B-1 SALEM AND HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATIONS' RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM ON-SITE SAMPLING LOCATIONS OUT TO 1 MILE N

e t

Salem and Hope Creek

• ~

Generating Stations NORMANDEAU 1 Mile ODCM Locations ASSOCIATES

....0*.12::5=***"--..-0.5Miles Date:

10119/2015 Revised: 400 Old Reading Pike Btd~ A. Suite 101 PROJECTlUO\,IJD SlowE", PA 19464 PRErnREOB\';SJ.!i MAP B-2 SALEM AND HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATIONS' RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM OFF-SITE SAMPLING LOCATIONS 1TO10 MILES

• .. . ., *.**. ,t ; ' :'.'\ *:*'.- *,: :.:-,;....' ,.: : "*'** . . .. '

. Sources: Es!\~;_Dqlcirme .. NAYJEO;.TomT~!ll,J~!ermap.j. rem.e.D.tP Ct;rp,,

GEBCO, USGS, \'AO.:.Nes,t-JRCAt-t.*Ge'oBpS(i/IGf'.l, ~a 9{.terNL, Ordnance survey\ Es.ti Japan, M~T!. Esrr China (Hong i<;cng. swisstopo,

• and the GIS User Communfy ;;- ** ' * :1;.

• N Salem and Hope Creek t

Generating Stations REMP Locations between 1and10 miles

• 11111i'c*25===1:l.s____SM!lcs Date: Revised:

1011612015 MAP 8-3 SALEM AND HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATIONS' RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM OFF-SITE SAMPLING LOCATIONS GREATER THAN 10 MILES N µ Salem and Hope Creek t

~* Generating Stations NORMANDEAU REMP Locations ASSOCIATES over 10miles

-llllli:::=---8Milcs.

Date:

10i16ilOf5 Revised:

Intentionally left blank APPENDIXC DATA TABLES AND FIGURES Intentionally left blank TABLE C-1 'CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMMITTERS IN QUARTERLY COMPOSITES OF AIR PARTICULATES, 2016 Results in Units of 1E-3 pCi/m 3 +/- 2 Sigma COLLECTION PERIOD <----------GAMMA EMITTERS---------->

STATION ID START STOP Be-7 K-40 Cs-134 Cs-137 SA-APT-14G1 (C) 12/28/15 - 03/28/16 124 +/- 35 < 27 < 1 < 1 03/28/16 - 06/27/16 168 +/- 38 < 16 < 1 < 1 06/27/16 - 10/03/16 104 +/- 24 < 16 < 2 < 2 10/03/16 - 01/03/17 106 +/- 26 < 30 <2 < 2 AVERAGE* 125 +/- 60 SA-APT-5S1 12/28/15 - 03/28/16 91 +/- 29 < 19 < 2 < 1 03/28/16 - 06/27/16 177 +/- 46 < 18 < 2 < 1 06/27/16 - 10/03/16 106 +/- 40 < 43 < 3 < 2 10/03/16 - 01/03/17 94 +/- 21 < 14 < 2 < 1 AVERAGE* 117 +/- 81 SA-APT-7S2 12/28/15 - 03/28/16 89 +/- 29 < 38 < 2 < 1 03/28/16 - 06/27/16 170 +/- 40 < 33 < 2 <2 06/27/16 - 10/03/16 103 +/- 23 < 30 < 2 < 1 10/03/16 - 01/03/17 117 +/- 26 < 31 < 2 < 2 AVERAGE* 120 +/- 71 SA-APT-15S2 12/28/15 - 03/28/16 85 +/- 26 < 19 < 2 < 1 03/28/16 - 06/27/16 143 +/- 54 < 45 < 2 < 2 06/27/16 - 10/03/16 131 +/- 27 < 24 < 2 < 1 10/03/16 - 01/03/17 110 +/- 21 < 30 < 2 < 2 AVERAGE* 117 +/- 51 SA-APT-5D1 12/28/15 - 03/28/16 91 +/- 26 < 30 < 1 < 2 03/28/16 - 06/27/16 147 +/- 30 < 16 < 1 < 1 06/27/16 - 10/03/16 106 +/- 21 < 33 < 2 < 2 10/03/16 - 01/03/17 116 +/- 24 < 23 < 2 < 2 AVERAGE* 115 +/- 47 SA-APT-16E1 12/28/15 - 03/28/16 89 +/- 20 < 16 < 1 < 1 03/28/16 - 06/27/16 186 +/- 40 < 12 < 2 < 1 06/27/16 - 10/03/16 113 +/- 36 < 33 < 3 < 2 10/03/16 - 01/03/17 89 +/- 39 < 39 < 2 < 2 AVERAGE* 119 +/- 91 SA-APT-1F1 12/28/15 - 03/28/16 118 +/- 36 < 36 < 3 < 2 03/28/16 - 06/27/16 139 +/- 33 < 18 < 2 < 2 06/27/16 - 10/03/16 125 +/- 25 < 20 ,< 2 < 1 10/03/16 - 01/03/17 92 +/- 21 < 20 < 1 < 1 AVERAGE* 118 +/- 39 SA-APT-2F6 12/28/15 - 03/28/16 103 +/- 29 < 20 < 1 < 1 03/28/16 - 06/27/16 163 +/- 36 < 26 < 1 < 1 06/27/16 - 10/03/16 97 +/- 23 < 33 < 2 < 2 10/03/16 - 01/03/17 117 +/- 31 < 25 < 2 < 1 AVERAGE* 120 +/- 60 ALL INDICATOR AVERAGE* 118 +/- 58 (C) CONTROL LOCATION.

• THE AVERAGE AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES.

- INDICATES AVERAGE WAS NOT CALCULATED DUE TO NO POSITIVE VALUES FOR THE REPORTING PERIOD.

TABLE C-2 CONCENTRATIONS OF GROSS BETA EMITTERS IN AIR PARTICULATES, 2016 Results in Units of 1E-3 pCi/m 3 +/- 2 Sigma COLLECTION PERIOD CONTROL INDICATORS START STOP SA-APT-14G1 SA-APT-5S1 SA-APT-7S2 SA-APT-15S2 SA-APT-5D1 SA-APT-16E1 12/28/15 - 01/04/16 10 +/- 3 9 +/- 3 9 +/- 3 11 +/- 3 9 +/- 3 9 +/- 3 01/04/16 01/11/16 11 +/- 3 10 +/- 3 8 +/- 3 11 +/- 3 10 +/- 3 10 +/- 3 01/11/16 01/18/16 15 +/- 3 17 +/- 3 19 +/- 3 14 +/- 3 18 +/- 3 17 +/- 3 01/18/16 01/26/16 11 +/- 2 13 +/- 3 11 +/- 2 10 +/- 2 11 +/- 2 11 +/- 3 01/26/16 02/03/16 13 +/- 3 16 +/- 4 13 +/- 3 14 +/- 3 14 +/- 3 14 +/- 3 02/03/16 02/08/16 13 +/- 4 8 +/- 4 7 +/- 4 13 +/- 4 9 +/- 4 10 +/- 4 02/08/16 02/16/16 5 +/- 2 11 +/- 3 10 +/- 2 10 +/- 2 11 +/- 2 8 +/- 2 02/16/16 02/22/16 13 +/- 3 10 +/- 3 10 +/- 3 9 +/- 3 10 +/- 3 10 +/- 3 02/22/16 02/29/16 12 +/- 3 12 +/- 3 7 +/- 3 9 +/- 3 9 +/- 3 10 +/- 3 02/29/16 03/07/16 13 +/- 3 12 +/- 3 11 +/- 3 10 +/- 3 9 +/- 3 13 +/- 3 03/07/16 03/14/16 5 +/- 3 17 +/- 3 16 +/- 3 14 +/- 3 13 +/- 3 13 +/- 3 03/14/16 03/22/16 10 +/- 3 6 +/- 3 6 +/- 3 6 +/- 2 7 +/- 3 9 +/- 3 03/22/16 03/28/16 11 +/- 3 10 +/- 3 9 +/- 3 10 +/- 3 10 +/- 3 9 +/- 3 03/28/16 04/04/16 14 +/- 3 12 +/- 3 12 +/- 3 11 +/- 3 12 +/- 3 12 +/- 3 04/04/16 04/11/16 13 +/- 3 11 +/- 3 13 +/- 3 13 +/- 3 10 +/- 3 13 +/- 3 04/11/16 04/18/16 12 +/- 3 11 +/- 3 11 +/- 3 13 +/- 3 11 +/- 3 12 +/- 3 04/18/16 04/25/16 14 +/- 3 13 +/- 3 15 +/- 3 13 +/- 3 12 +/- 3 15 +/- 3 04/25/16 05/02/16 15 +/- 3 10 +/- 3 11 +/- 3 12 +/- 3 12 +/- 3 14 +/- 3 05/02/16 05/09/16 <4 <4 <4 <4 <4 5 +/- 3 05/09/16 05/16/16 17 +/- 3 14 +/- 3 15 +/- 3 18 +/- 4 14 +/- 3 20 +/- 4 05/16/16 05/23/16 13 +/- 3 12 +/- 3 12 +/- 3 *14 +/- 3 7 +/- 3 12 +/- 3 05/23/16 05/31/16 15 +/- 3 16 +/- 3 14 +/- 3 14 +/- 3 14 +/- 3 10 +/- 3 05/31/16 06/07/16 12 +/- 3 10 +/- 2 10 +/- 3 12 +/- 3 11 +/- 3 12 +/- 3 06/06/16 06/13/16 14 +/- 3 15 +/- 4 13 +/- 3 14 +/- 3 12 +/- 4 13 +/- 3 06/13/16 06/20/16 12 +/- 3 10 +/- 2 9 +/- 2 12 +/- 3 9 +/- 2 9 +/- 3 06/20/16 06/27/16 15 +/- 3 17 +/- 3 16 +/- 3 15 +/- 3 18 +/- 3 13 +/- 3 06/27/16 07/05/16 9 +/- 2 11 +/- 3 7 +/- 2 10 +/- 2 8 +/- 2 11 +/- 2 07/05/16 07/13/16 15 +/- 3 12 +/- 3 11 +/- 2 11 +/- 2 11 +/- 2 11 +/- 3 07/13/16 07/18/16 19 +/- 5 14 +/- 4 16 +/- 4 15 +/- 4 17 +/- 5 16 +/- 4 07118/16 07/25/16 19 +/- 4 14 +/- 3 19 +/- 3 17 +/- 3 17 +/- 4 18 +/- 4 07/25/16 08/01/16 16 +/- 3 9 +/- 3 12 +/- 3 12 +/- 3 16 +/- 3 15 +/- 3 08/01/16 08/05/16 13 +/- 4 11 +/- 4 10 +/- 4 13 +/- 4 10 +/- 4 13 +/- 4 08/05/16 08/10/16 15 +/- 4 12 +/- 4 12 +/- 4 12 +/- 4 13 +/- 4 13 +/- 4 08/10/16 08/18/16 11 +/- 3 8 +/- 3 10 +/- 2 8 +/- 2 6 +/- 2 11 +/- 3 08/18/16 08/24/16 13 +/- 4 13 +/- 3 16 +/- 4 13 +/- 4 10 +/- 3 16 +/- 4 08/24/16 08/29/16 17 +/- 4 17 +/- 4 15 +/- 4 14 +/- 4 13 +/- 4 13 +/- 4 08/29/16 09/06/16 13 +/- 3 13 +/- 3 12 +/- 3 13 +/- 3 11 +/- 3 12 +/- 3 09/06/16 09/12/16 23 +/- 4 21 +/- 4 20 +/- 4 17 +/- 4 17 +/- 4 18 +/- 4 09/12/16 09/19/16 13 +/- 3 14 +/- 3 11 +/- 3 12 +/- 3 11 +/- 3 11 +/- 3 09/19/16 09/26/16 12 +/- 3 12 +/- 3 9 +/- 3 12 +/- 3 13 +/- 3 13 +/- 3 09/26/16 10/03/16 <4 5 +/- 3 4 +/- 3 6 +/- 3 7 +/- 3 6 +/- 3 10/03/16 10/11 /16 13 +/- 3 12 +/- 3 13 +/- 3 12 +/- 3 12 +/- 3 14 +/- 3 10/11 /16 10/17/16 9 +/- 3 6 +/- 3 9 +/- 3 10 +/- 3 8 +/- 3 11 +/- 3 10/17/16 10/24/16 13 +/- 3 15 +/- 3 15 +/- 3 16 +/- 3 13 +/- 3 15 +/- 3 10/24/16 10/31/16 16 +/- 3 14 +/- 3 17 +/- 3 13 +/- 3 13 +/- 3 12 +/- 3 10/31/16 11/07/16 19 +/- 3 16 +/- 3 19 +/- 3 14 +/- 3 19 +/- 3 16 +/- 3 11/07/16 11/15/16 15 +/- 3 15 +/- 3 14 +/- 3 13 +/- 3 13 +/- 3 15 +/- 3 11/15/16 11/21/16 18 +/- 4 22 +/- 4 21 +/- 4 23 +/- 4 22 +/- 4 22 +/- 4 11/21/16 11/28/16 20 +/- 4 14 +/- 3 13 +/- 3 16 +/- 3 16 +/- 3 14 +/- 3 11/28/16 12/05/16 15 +/- 3 17 +/- 3 14 +/- 3 17 +/- 3 15 +/- 3 18 +/- 3 12/05/16 12/12/16 9 +/- 3 11 +/- 3 10 +/- 3 10 +/- 3 16 +/- 3 11 +/- 3 12/12/16 12/19/16 13 +/- 3 13 +/- 3 20 +/- 4 16 +/- 3 10 +/- 3 14 +/- 3 12/19/16 12/27/16 18 +/- 3 18 +/- 3 21 +/- 3 18 +/- 3 18 +/- 3 19 +/- 3 12/27/16 01/03/17 11 +/- 3 9 +/- 3 13 +/- 3 11 +/- 3 8 +/- 3 9 +/- 3 AVERAGE* 14 +/- 7 13 +/- 7 13 +/- 8 13 +/- 6 12 +/- 7 13 +/- 7 TABLE C-2 CONCENTRATIONS OF GROSS BETA EMITTERS IN AIR PARTICULATES, 2016 Results in Units of 1E-3 pCi/m 3 +/- 2 Sigma COLLECTION PERIOD INDICATORS START STOP SA-APT-1 F1 SA-APT-2F6 12/28/15 - 01/04/16 8 +/- 3 10 +/- 3 01/04/16 - 01/11/16 6 +/- 3 8 +/- 2 01/11/16 - 01/18/16 22 +/- 4 16 +/- 3 01/18/16 - 01/26/16 10 +/- 2 9 +/- 2 01/26/16 - 02/03/16 13 +/- 3 14 +/- 3 02/03/16 - 02/08/16 9 +/- 4 12 +/- 4 02/08/16 - 02/16/16 10 +/- 2 10 +/- 2 02/16/16 - 02/22/16 8 +/- 3 12 +/- 3 02/22/16 - 02/29/16 9 +/- 3 8 +/- 3 02/29/16 - 03/07/16 8 +/- 3 11 +/- 3 03/07/16 - 03/14/16 11 +/- 3 15 +/- 3 03/14/16 - 03/22/16 8 +/- 3 9 +/- 3 03/22/16 - 03/28/16 10 +/- 3 8 +/- 3 03/28/16 - 04/04/16 11 +/- 3 12 +/- 3 04/04/16 - 04/11/16 11 +/- 3 12 +/- 3 04/11/16 - 04/18/16 11 +/- 3 9 +/- 3 04/18/16 - 04/25/16 16 +/- 3 14 +/- 3 04/25/16 - 05/02/16 11 +/- 3 10 +/- 3 05/02/16 - 05/09/16 4 +/- 3 <4 05/09/16 - 05/16/16 12 +/- 3 21 +/- 4 05/16/16 - 05/23/16 11 +/- 3 11 +/- 3 05/23/16 - 05/31/16 15 +/- 3 16 +/- 3 05/31/16 - 06/07/16 12 +/- 3 10 +/- 3 06/06/16 - 06/13/16 15 +/- 4 13 +/- 3 06/13/16 - 06/20/16 8 +/- 2 11 +/- 3 06/20/16 - 06/27/16 14 +/- 3 15 +/- 3 06/27/16 - 07/05/16 10 +/- 2 10 +/- 2 07/05/16 - 07/13/16 12 +/- 3 10 +/- 2 07/13/16 - 07/18/16 19 +/- 5 17 +/- 5 07/18/16 - 07/25/16 18 +/- 4 17 +/- 4 07/25/16 - 08/01/16 13 +/- 3 15 +/- 3 08/01/16 - 08/05/16 12 +/- 4 9 +/- 4 08/05/16 - 08/10/16 13 +/- 4 10 +/- 4 08/10/16 - 08/18/16 10 +/- 3 8 +/-" 3 08/18/16 - 08/24/16 14 +/- 4 13 +/- 4 08/24/16 - 08/29/16 13 +/- 4 16 +/- 4 08/29/16 - 09/06/16 10 +/- 2 14 +/- 3 09/06/16 - 09/12/16 19 +/- 4 17 +/- 3 09/12/16 - 09/19/16 9 +/- 3 14 +/- 3 09/19/16 - 09/26/16 12 +/- 3 10 +/- 3 09/26/16 - 10/03/16 4 +/- 3 6 +/- 3 10/03/16 - 10/11 /16 12 +/- 3 11 +/- 3 10/11/16 - 10/17/16 10 +/- 3 10 +/- 3 10/17/16 - 10/24/16 13 +/- 3 15 +/- 3 10/24/16 - 10/31/16 16 +/- 3 15 +/- 3 10/31/16 - 11/07/16 14 +/- 3 14 +/- 3 11/07/16 - 11/15/16 14 +/- 3 13 +/- 3 11/15/16 - 11/21/16 21 +/- 4 26 +/- 4 11/21/16 - 11/28/16 14 +/- 3 14 +/- 3 11/28/16 - 12/05/16 12 +/- 3 15 +/- 3 12/05/16 - 12/12/16 12 +/- 3 9 +/- 3 12/12/16 - 12/19/16 12 +/- 3 12 +/- 3 12/19/16 - 12/27/16 19 +/- 3 20 +/- 3 12/27/16 - 01/03/17 9 +/- 3 10 +/- 3 AVERAGE* 12 +/- 8 12 +/- 7 ALL INDICATOR AVERAGE* 12 +/- 7

• THE AVERAGE AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES.

TABLE C-3 CONCENTRATIONS OF IODINE-131 IN FILTERED AIR, 2016 3

Results in Units of 1E-3 pCi/m +/- 2 Sigma COLLECTION PERIOD CONTROL INDICATORS START STOP SA-AI0-14G1 SA-AI0-5S1 SA-AI0-7S2 SA-AI0-15S2 SA-AI0-5D1 SA-AI0-16E1 12/28/15 - 01/04/16 < 56 < 42 < 59 < 54 < 39 < 59 01/04/16 - 01/11/16 < 41 < 35 < 43 < 14 < 42 < 44 01/11/16 - 01/18/16 < 35 < 32 < 36 < 14 < 31 < 38 01/18/16 - 01/26/16 < 8 < 41 < 22 < 22 < 21 < 23 01/26/16 - 02/03/16 < 24 < 40 < 26 < 24 < 28 < 26 02/03/16 - 02/08/16 < 32 < 26 < 33 < 13 < 26 < 33 02/08/16 - 02/16/16 < 10 < 15 < 9 < 9 < 14 < 10 02/16/16 - 02/22/16 < 43 < 29 < 42 < 40 < 28 < 43 02/22/16 - 02/29/16 < 22 < 14 < 21 < 20 < 14 < 15 02/29/16 - 03/07/16 < 32 < 24 < 35 < 34 < 24 < 35 03/07/16 - 03/14/16 < 22 < 29 < 20 < 19 < 29 < 19 03/14/16 - 03/22/16 < 31 < 21 < 30 < 16 < 19 < 30 03/22/16 - 03/28/16 < 44 < 27 < 46 < 18 < 25 < 47 03/28/16 - 04/04/16 < 39 < 42 < 41 < 39 < 38 < 41 04/04/16 - 04/11/16 < 22 < 20 < 23 < 21 < 17 < 23 04/11/16 - 04/18/16 < 43 < 37 < 43 < 42 < 36 < 44 04/18/16 - 04/25/16 < 36 < 26 < 16 < 38 < 26 < 37 04/25/16 - 05/02/16 < 22 < 18 < 8 < 21 < 19 < 23 05/02/16 - 05/09/16 < 48 < 20 < 48 < 51 < 21 < 48 05/09/16 - 05/16/16 < 57 < 50 < 52 < 56 < 51 < 56 05/16/16 - 05/23/16 < 50 < 28 < 49 < 53 < 29 < 50 05/23/16 - 05/31/16 < 45 < 28 < 39 < 42 < 31 < 41 05/31/16 - 06/07/16 < 56 < 13 < 38 < 41 < 36 < 55 06/06/16 - 06/13/16 < 26 < 69 < 53 < 54 < 67 < 49 06/13/16 - 06/20/16 < 47 < 60 < 42 < 43 < 65 < 48 06/20/16 - 06/27/16 < 24 < 25 < 23 < 23 < 26 < 24 06/27/16 - 07/05/16 < 29 < 7 < 27 < 28 < 16 < 29 07/05/16 - 07/13/16 < 43 < 35 < 13 < 38 < 35 < 42 07/13/16 - 07/18/16 < 57 < 14 < 23 < 57 < 43 < 57 07/18/16 - 07/25/16 < 33 < 43 < 12 < 30 < 34 < 33 07/25/16 - 08/01/16 < 46 < 38 < 43 < 43 < 40 < 44 08/01/16 - 08/05/16 < 68 < 51 < 28 < 67 < 61 < 69 08/05/16 - 08/10/16 < 44 < 33 < 42 < 42 < 32 < 43 08/10/16 - 08/18/16 < 23 < 25 < 24 < 24 < 22 < 25 08/18/16 - 08/24/16 < 39 < 17 < 38 < 37 < 44 < 38 08/24/16 - 08/29/16 < 30 < 35 < 26 < 27 < 34 < 27 08/29/16 - 09/06/16 < 15 < 16 < 5 < 13 < 19 < 14 09/06/16 - 09/12/16 < 32 < 35 < 32 < 32 < 37 < 32 09/12/16 - 09/19/16 < 23 < 7 < 19 < 19 < 20 < 19 09/19/16 - 09/26/16 < 25 < 18 < 26 < 11 < 21 < 25 09/26/16 - 10/03/16 < 25 < 8 < 25 < 24 < 25 < 25 10/03/16 - 10/11/16 < 26 < 17 < 25 < 24 < 19 < 24 10/11/16 - 10/17/16 < 27 < 26 < 27 < 27 < 26 < 27 10/17/16 - 10/24/16 < 23 < 20 < 22 < 21 < 19 < 21 10/24/16 - 10/31/16 < 30 < 26 < 27 < 27 < 25 < 26 10/31/16 - 11/07/16 < 25 < 25 < 25 < 24 < 25 < 25 11/07/16 - 11/15/16 < 23 < 24 < 24 < 24 < 24 < 24 11/15/16 - 11/21/16 < 56 < 43 < 57 < 20 < 39 < 57 11/21/16 - 11/28/16 < 25 < 28 < 22 < 8 < 29 < 24 11/28/16 - 12/05/16 < 22 < 21 < 23 < 22 < 21 < 21 12/05/16 - 12/12/16 < 26 < 9 < 27 < 27 < 25 < 27 12/12/16 - 12/19/16 < 34 < 38 < 38 < 35 < 38 < 34 12/19/16 - 12/27/16 < 34 < 38 < 36 < 33 < 38 < 33 12/27/16 - 01/03/17 < 22 < 25 < 25 < 23 < 24 < 22 AVERAGE TABLE C-3 CONCENTRATIONS OF IODINE-131 IN FILTERED AIR, 2016 3

Results in Units of 1E-3 pCi/m +/- 2 Sigma COLLECTION PERIOD INDICATORS START STOP SA-AI0-1F1 SA-AI0-2F6 12/28/15 - 01/04/16 < 41 < 39 01/04/16 - 01/11/16 < 37 < 34 01/11/16 - 01/18/16 < 38 < 33 01/18/16 - 01/26/16 < 33 < 29 01/26/16 - 02/03/16 < 29 < 27 02/03/16 - 02/08/16 < 27 < 26 02/08/16 - 02/16/16 < 14 < 13 02/16/16 - 02/22/16 < 25 < 28 02/22/16 - 02/29/16 < 5 < 14 02/29/16 - 03/07/16 < 22 < 27 03/07/16 - 03/14/16 < 31 < 31 03/14/16 - 03/22/16 < 19 < 20 03/22/16 - 03/28/16 < 26 < 26 03/28/16 - 04/04/16 < 40 < 38 04/04/16 - 04/11/16 < 18 < 17 04/11/16 - 04/18/16 < 39 < 38 04/18/16 - 04/25/16 < 27 < 28 04/25/16 - 05/02/16 < 19 < 20 05/02/16 - 05/09/16 < 21 < 22 05/09/16 - 05/16/16 < 53 < 54 05/16/16 - 05/23/16 < 31 < 30 05/23/16 - 05/31/16 < 30 < 30 05/31/16 - 06/07/16 < 37 < 38 06/06/16 - 06/13/16 < 67 < 62 06/13/16 - 06/20/16 < 62 < 67 06/20/16 - 06/27/16 < 26 < 27 06/27/16 - 07/05/16 < 16 < 17 07/05/16 - 07/13/16 < 34 < 35 07/13/16 - 07/18/16 < 42 < 42 07/18/16 - 07/25/16 < 48 < 49 07/25/16 - 08/01/16 < 38 < 38 08/01/16 - 08/05/16 < 58 < 60 08/05/16 - 08/10/16 < 30 < 31 08/10/16 - 08/18/16 < 22 < 24 08/18/16 - 08/24/16 < 44 < 46 08/24/16 - 08/29/16 < 33 < 34 08/29/16 - 09/06/16 < 17 < 18 09/06/16 - 09/12/16 < 36 < 18 09/12/16 - 09/19/16 < 18 < 19 09/19/16 - 09/26/16 < 19 < 20 09/26/16 - 10/03/16 < 23 < 23 10/03/16 - 10/11/16 < 19 < 18 10/11/16 - 10/17/16 < 27 < 26 10/17/16 - 10/24/16 < 20 < 20 10/24/16 - 10/31/16 < 26 < 24 10/31/16 - 11/07/16 < 25 < 26 11/07/16 - 11/15/16 < 24 < 23 11/15/16 - 11/21/16 < 39 < 42 11/21/16 - 11/28/16 < 11 < 28 11/28/16 - 12/05/16 < 20 < 20 12/05/16 - 12/12/16 < 26 < 25 12/12/16 - 12/19/16 < 37 < 39 12/19/16 - 12/27/16 < 42 < 42 12/27/16 - 01/03/17 < 24 < 25 AVERAGE

- INDICATES AVERAGE WAS NOT CALCULATED DUE TO NO POSITIVE VALUES FOR THE REPORTING PERIOD.

TABLE C-4 DIRECT RADIATION MEASUREMENTS - QUARTERLY DOSIMETRY RESULTS*, 2016 Results in Units of mR I Standard Quarter ANNUAL DOSE STATION ID mR/~r JAN- MAR APR-JUN JUL-SEP OCT-DEC SA-IDM-1G3 (C) 52.1 13.4 13.3 11.6 . 13.8 SA-IDM-3G1 (C) 53.3 13.3 14.4 11.3 14.3 SA-IDM-10G1 (C) 54.2 13.9 14.0 12.0 14.3 SA-IDM-14G1 (C) 57.4 15.2 14.9 12.8 14.5 SA-IDM-16G1 (C) 49.1 12.6 13.0 10.5 13.0 SA-IDM-3H1 (C) 47.3 11.8 12.4 10.1 13.0 SA-IDM-1 S1 ** 112.5 25.9 25.3 29.5 31.8 SA-IDM-2S2 54.7 11.4 15.4 13.3 14.6 SA-IDM-2S4 51.2 14.4 12.3 11.2 13.3 SA-IDM-3S1 45.9 10.7 12.6 10.2 12.4 SA-IDM-4S1 46.5 10.8 11.1 11.4 13.2 SA-IDM-5S1 43.4 10.7 11.1 9.8 11.8 SA-IDM-6S2 59.5. 13.7 14.4 14.9 16.5 SA-IDM-7S1 46.7 11.2 10.2 13.3 12.0 SA-IDM-8S1 40.8 9.9 7.5 12.5 10.9 SA-IDM-9S1 42.3 10.5 8.5 12.4 10.9 SA-IDM-1 OS1 44.3 10.9 9.4 12.7 11.3 SA-IDM-11 S1 42.1 9.1 .9.8 11.9 11.3 SA-IDM-12S1 55.9 13.1 11.3 16.7 14.8 SA-IDM-13S1 59.8 13.8 13.7 17.8 14.5 SA-IDM-14S1 61.4 15.5 13.1 17.7 15.1 SA-IDM-15S1 40.2 10.1 9.8 8.6 11.7 SA-IDM-15S2 49.3 11.7 13.0 11.0 13.6 SA-IDM-16S1 50.5 12.1 12.4 11.8 14.2 SA-I DM-16S2** 116.3 28.2 28.2 28.6 31.3 SA-IDM-16S3 43.9 10.6 11.4 9.6 12.3 SA-IDM-4D2 54.2 12.5 14.4 12.2 15.1 SA-IDM-5D1 51.0 12.5 13.6 11.1 13.8 SA-IDM-1 OD1 54.1 13.5 13.1 12.3 15.2 SA-IDM-14D1 49.5 12.6 13.4 10.8 12.7 SA-IDM-15D1 55.2 15.2 14.1 11.7 14.2 SA-IDM-2E1 53.0 13.8 13.1 12.3 13.8 SA-IDM-3E1 43.5 11.1 10.9 9.5 12.0 SA-IDM-11 E2 55.2 13.7 14.2 12.8 14.5 SA-IDM-12E1 54.5 13.3 14.7 11.9 14.6 SA-IDM-13E1 46.0 12.8 11.2 9.8 12.2 SA-IDM-16E1 52.7 13.2 13.6 11.8 14.1 SA-IDM-1F1 66.5 16.0 17.3 14.8 18.4 SA-IDM-2F2 46.2 11.1 11.7 10.7 12.7 SA-IDM-2F5 54.7 12.4 15.7 11.5 15.1 SA-IDM-2F6 47.3 11.2 13.4 9.4 13.3 SA-IDM-3F2 46.1 11.3 11.9 10.0 12.9 SA-IDM-3F3 46.5 10.8 13.0 10.0 12.7 SA-IDM-4F2 45.8 11.4 11.6 9.9 12.9 SA-IDM-5F1 47.0 11.8 11.7 10.2 13.3 SA-IDM-6F1 41.4 11.6 10.3 8.1 11.4 SA-IDM-7F2 46.8 9.9 12.9 10.6 13.4 SA-IDM-8F1 58.8 14.6 15.7 13.4 15.1 SA-IDM-9F1 56.4 14.7 13.9 12.7 15.1 SA-IDM-1 OF2 54.5 14.0 13.8 12.9 13.8 SA-IDM-11 F1 14.9 15.4 12.5 SA-IDM-12F1 52.8 14.2 13.4 11.2 14.0 SA-IDM-13F2 53.7 13.2 13.9 12.9 13.7 SA-IDM-13F3 54.2 14.6 13.8 12.1 13.7 SA-IDM-13F4 55.0 14.5 14.5 12.0 14.0 SA-IDM-14F2 56.5 14.6 14.8 12.4 14.7 SA-IDM-15F3 56.8 14.7 13.7 13.2 15.2 SA-IDM-16F2 47.6 12.3 12.5 10.0 12.8

• QUARTERLY ELEMENT TLD RESULTS BY MIRION TECHNOLOGIES.

• • SAMPLE RESULTS ARE AFFECTED BY THE ISFSI, INDPENDENT SPENT FUEL STORAGE INSTALLATION.

• • • SEE PROGRAM EXCEPTIONS OF THIS REPORT.

TABLE C-5 CONCENTRATIONS OF IODINE-131 AND GAMMA EMITTERS IN MILK, 2016 Results in Units of pCi/L +/- 2 Sigma COLLECTION PERIOD <-----GAMMA EMITTERS----->

STATION ID START STOP 1-131 LL K-40 Cs-134 . Cs-137 BaLa-140 Ra-226 SA-MLK-3G1 (C) 01/03/16 - 01/04/16 < 0.3 1,311 +/- 120 < 4 < 5 < 8 < 89 SA-MLK-3G1 (C) 02/07/16 - 02/08/16 < 0.4 1,278 +/- 160 < 7 < 8 < 13 < 170 SA-MLK-3G1 (C) 03/06/16 - 03/07/16 < 0.7 1,369 +/- 180 < 7 < 9 < 5 < 204 SA-MLK-3G1 (C) 04/03/16 - 04/04/16 < 0.6 1,231 +/- 187 < 6 < 9 < 8 < 175 SA-MLK-3G1 (C) 04/17/16 - 04/18/16 < 0.5 1,454 +/- 237 < 9 < 10 < 14 < 232 SA-MLK-3G1 (C) 05/01/16 - 05/02/16 < 0.5 1,202 +/- 175 < 7 < 9 < 9 < 190 SA-MLK-3G1 (C) 05/15/16 - 05/16/16 < 0.4 1,271 +/- 138 < 5 < 6 < 8 < 158 SA-MLK-3G1 (C) 06/07/16 - 06/08/16 < 0.5 1,443 +/- 162 < 6 < 8 < 9 < 166 SA-MLK-3G1 (C) 06/19/16 - 06/20/16 < 0.6 1, 129 +/- 165 < 6 < 7 <8 < 191 SA-MLK-3G1 (C) 07/12/16 - 07/13/16 < 0.4 1,431 +/- 227 < 7 < 10 < 14 < 183 SA-MLK-3G1 (C) 07/25/16 - 07/26/16 < 0.7 1,481 +/- 252 < 9 < 9 < 14 < 234 SA-MLK-3G1 (C) 08/07/16 - 08/08/16 < 0.9 1,198 +/- 179 < 8 < 9 < 12 < 194 SA-MLK-3G1 (C) 08/21/16 - 08/22/16 < 0.3 1,365 +/- 202 < 7 < 7 < 12 < 184 SA-MLK-3G1 (C) 09/05/16 - 09/06/16 < 0.6 1,231 +/- 173 < 8 < 8 < 11 < 196 SA-MLK-3G1 (C) 09/18/16 - 09/19/16 < 0.9 1,683 +/- 197 < 7 < 9 < 15 < 203 SA-MLK-3G1 (C) 10/02/16 - 10/03/16 < 0.4 1,333 +/- 199 < 8 < 8 < 14 < 211 SA-MLK-3G1 (C) 10/16/16 - 10/17/16 < 0.8 1,204 +/- 132 < 5 < 6 < 7 < 140 SA-MLK-3G1 (C) 11/14/16 - 11/15/16 < 0.9 1,266 +/- 163 < 7 < 8 < 8 < 174 SA-MLK-3G1 (C) 11/27/16 - 11/28/16 < 0.4 1,337 +/- 181 < 6 < 8 < 10 < 164 SA-MLK-3G1 (C) 12/04/16 - 12/05/16 < 0.7 1,506 +/- 220 < 9 < 10 < 14 < 231 AVERAGE* 1,336 +/- 267 SA-MLK-13E3 01/03/16 - 01/04/16 < 0.3 1,197 +/- 176 < 6 < 7 < 12 < 121 SA-MLK-13E3 02/07/16 - 02/08/16 < o.4 1,445 +/- 187 < 7 < 8 < 7 < 172 SA-MLK-13E3 03/06/16 - 03/07/16 < 0.7 1,200 +/- 205 < 11 < 11 < 14 < 244 SA-MLK-13E3 04/03/16 - 04/04/16 < 0.5 1,347 +/- 186 < 7 < 8 < 8 < 218 SA-MLK-13E3 04/17/16 - '04/18/16 < 0.5 1,273 +/- 204 < 8 < 11 < 12 < 242 SA-MLK-13E3 05/01/16 - 05/02/16 < 0.7 1,137 +/- 197 < 7 < 10 < 10 < 210 SA-MLK-13E3 05/15/16 - 05/16/16 < 0.5 1,238 +/- 130 < 5 < 6 < 9 < 164 SA-MLK-13E3 06/05/16 - 06/06/16 < 0.7 1,381 +/- 175 < 7 < 8 < 11 < 142 SA-MLK-13E3 06/19/16 - 06/20/16 < 0.7 1,192 +/- 200 < 6 < 9 < 14 < 176 SA-MLK-13E3 07/12/16 - 07/13/16 < 0.4 1,276 +/- 262 < 12 < 10 < 14 < 246 SA-MLK-13E3 07/25/16 - 07/26/16 < 0.8 1,338 +/- 203 < 12 < 12 < 13 < 279 SA-MLK-13E3 08/07/16 - 08/08/16 < 0.5 1,300 +/- 203 < 9 < 9 < 8 < 237 SA-MLK-13E3 08/21/16 - 08/22/16 < 0.3 1,471 +/- 157 < 7 < 6 < 12 < 171 SA-MLK-13E3 09/05/16 - 09/06/16 < 0.4 1,247 +/- 196 < 8 < 11 < 15 < 186 SA-MLK-13E3 09/18/16 - 09/19/16 < 0.9 1,388 +/- 202 < 7 < 8 < 14 < 243 SA-MLK-13E3 10/02/16 - 10/03/16 < 0.5 1;284 +/- 158 < 8 < 8 < 12 < 206 SA-MLK-13E3 10/16/16 - 10/17/16 < 0.6 1,299 +/- 136 < 5 < 6 < 11 < 148 SA-MLK-13E3 11/14/16 - 11/15/16 < 0.4 1,423 +/- 146 < 6 < 7 < 9 < 128 SA-MLK-13E3 11/27/16 - 11/28/16 < 0.4 1,323 +/- 167 < 8 < 9 < 10 < 212 SA-MLK-13E3 12/04/16 - 12/05/16 < 0.6 1,644 +/- 186 < 9 < 9 < 14 < 209 AVERAGE* 1,320 +/- 234 TABLE C-5 CONCENTRATIONS OF IODINE-131 AND GAMMA EMITTERS IN MILK, 2016 Results in Units of pCi/L +/- 2 Sigma COLLECTION PERIOD <-------GAMMA EMITTERS---->

STATION ID START STOP 1-131 LL K-40 Cs-134 Cs-137 BaLa-140 Ra-226 SA-MLK-14F4 01/03/16 - 01/04/16 < 0.3 1,403 +/- 179 < 6 < 9 < 11 < 181 SA-MLK-14F4 02/07/16 - 02/08/16 < 0.5 1,471 +/- 222 < 7 < 7 < 11 < 158 SA-MLK-14F4 03/06/16 - 03/07/16 < 0.7 1,160 +/- 210 < 7 <: 8 < 11 < 235 SA-MLK-14F4 04/03/16 - 04/04/16 < 0:5 1,627 +/- 184 < 8 < 8 < 9 < 201 SA-MLK-14F4 04/17/16 - 04/18/16 < 0.9 1,448 +/- 281 < 10 < 10 < 4 < 257 SA-MLK-14F4 05/01/16 - 05/02/16 < 0.7 1,260 +/- 186 < 9 < 11 < 15 < 180 SA-MLK-14F4 05/15/16 - 05/16/16 < 0.6 1,231 +/- 142 < 6 < 7 < 11 < 162 SA-MLK-14F4 06/05/16 - 06/06/16 < 0.6 1,423 +/- 130 < 5 < 6 < 9 < 115 SA-MLK-14F4 06/19/16 - 06/20/16 < 0.5 1,457 +/- 185 < 5 < 6 < 4 < 129 SA-MLK-14F4 07/12/16 - 07/13/16 < 0.5 1, 138 +/- 224 < 8 < 10 < 14 < 228 SA-MLK-14F4 07/25/16 - 07/26/16 < 0.6 1,548 +/- 257 < 10 < 11 < 12 < 232 SA-MLK-14F4 08/07/16 - 08/08/16 < 0.7 1,448 +/- 184 < 7 < 7 < 7 < 153 SA-MLK-14F4 08/21/16 - 08/22/16 < 0.5 1,616 +/- 208 < 9 < 9 < 15 < 171 SA-MLK-14F4 09/05/16 - 09/06/16 < 0.8 1,385 +/- 191 < 8 < 9 < 11 < 262 SA-MLK-14F 4 09/18/16 - 09/19/16 < 0.7 1,465 +/- 177 < 9 < 8 < 14 < 229 SA-MLK-14F4 10/02/16 - 10/03/16 < 0.7 1,302 +/- 128 < 7 < 6 < 8 < 178 SA-MLK-14F4 10/16/16 - 10/17/16 < 0.9 1,433 +/- 184 < 8 < 10 < 15 < 172 SA-MLK-14F4 11/14/16 - 11/15/16 < 0.7 1,292 +/- 174 < 8 < 9 < 13 < 169 SA-MLK-14F4 11/27/16 - 11/28/16 < 0.3 1,273 +/- 153 < 7 < 7 < 11 < 191 SA-MLK-14F4 12/04/16 - 12/05/16 < 0.6 1,527 +/- 225 < 6 < 9 < 8 < 238 AVERAGE* 1,395 +/- 278 SA-MLK-2G3 01/03/16 - 01/04/16 < 0.3 1,342 +/- 153 < 7 < 8 < 13 < 200 SA-MLK-2G3 02/07/16 - 02/08/16 < 0.3 1,233 +/- 159 < 7 < 7 < 9 < 161 SA-MLK-2G3 03/06/16 - 03/07/16 < 0.6 1,527 +/- 198 < 7 < 8 < 10 < 192 SA-MLK-2G3 04/03/16 - 04/04/16 < 0.5 1,432 +/- 164 < 7 < 7 < 9 < 185 SA-MLK-2G3 04/17/16 - 04/18/16 < 0.5 1,537 +/- 207 < 7 < 8 < 9 < 236 SA-MLK-2G3 05/01/16 - 05/02/16 < 0.6 1,532 +/- 197 < 5 < 7 < 11 < 172 SA-MLK-2G3 05/15/16 - 05/16/16 < 0.5 1,280 +/- 125 < 4 < 5 < 8 < 131 SA-MLK-2G3 06/06/16 - 06/07/16 < 0.5 1,320 +/- 167 < 5 < 7 < 10 < 192 SA-MLK-2G3 06/19/16 - 06/20/16 < 0.6 1,231 +/- 180 < 7 < 7 < 10 < 197 SA-MLK-2G3 07/12/16 - 07/13/16 < 0.4 1,242 +/- 183 < 7 < 9 < 11 < 218 SA-MLK-2G3 07/25/16 - 07/26/16 < 0.7 1,577 +/- 225 < 8 < 7 < 15 < 213 SA-MLK-2G3 08/07/16 - 08/08/16 < 0.5 1,102 +/- 218 < 11 < 11 < 10 < 204 SA-MLK-2G3 08/21/16 - 08/22/16 < 0.3 1,468 +/- 216 < 7 < 6 < 14 < 200 SA-MLK-2G3 09/05/16 - 09/06/16 < 0.6 1,267 +/- 161 < 7 < 7 < 10 < 194 SA-MLK-2G3 09/18/16 - 09/19/16 < 0.5 1,482 +/- 201 < 8 < 9 < 11 < 224 SA-MLK-2G3 10/02/16 - 10/03/16 < 0.7 1,403 +/- 170 < 7 < 9 < 11 < 190 SA-MLK-2G3 10/16/16 - 10/17/16 < 0.7 1,312 +/- 136 < 5 < 5 < 9 < 130 SA-MLK-2G3 11/14/16 - 11/15/16 < 0.8 1,388 +/- 135 <5 < 6 < 6 < 119 SA-MLK-2G3 11/27/16 - 11/28/16 < 0.3 1,392 +/- 172 < 8 < 9 < 12 < 221 SA-MLK-2G3 12/04/16 - 12/05/16 < 0.7 1,510 +/- 195 < 7 < 7 < 6 < 209 AVERAGE* 1,379 +/- 259 ALL INDICATOR AVERAGE* 1,365 +/- 262 (C) CONTROL LOCATION.

• THE AVERAGE AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES.

- INDICATES AVERAGE WAS NOT CALCULATED DUE TO NO POSITIVE VALUES FOR THE REPORTING PERIOD.

TABLE C-6 CONCENTRATIONS OF GROSS ALPHA AND GROSS BETA EMITTERS AND TRITIUM IN WELL WATER**, 2016 Results in U~its of pCi/L +/- 2 Sigma COLLECTION STATION ID DATE Gr-A Gr-B H-3 SA-WWA-3E1 01/29/16 < 1.1 < 2.4 < 193 02/16/16 < 1.6 < 2.2 < 184 03/17/16 < 2.0 < 2.2 < 200 04/13/16 < 0.8 < 2.1 < 180 05/19/16 < 1.8 2.8 +/- 1.7 < 177 06/27/16 < 1.6 < 2.3 < 189 07/26/16 < 2.8 3.6 +/- 1.7 < 175 08/24/16 < 1.2 3.8 +/- 1.6 < 169 09/19/16 < 1.1 < 2.1 < 192 10/24/16 < 1.4 < 2.5 < 192 11/21/16 < 1.9 2.8 +/- 1.5 < 192 12/21/16 < 1.7 < 2.5 < 192 AVERAGE* 3.2 +/- 1.1

• THE AVERAGE AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITVIE VALUES.

• • MANAGEMENT AUDIT SAMPLE: NOT REQUIRED BY ODCM.

- INDICATES AVERAGE WAS NOT CALCULATED DUE TO NO POSITIVE VALUES FOR THE REPORTING PERIOC J

TABLE C-7 CONCENTRATIONS OF IODINE-131 AND GAMMA EMITTERS IN WELL WATER**, 2016 Results in Units of pCi/L +/- 2 Sigma COLLECTION <----------GAMMA EMITTERS--------->

STATION ID DATE 1-131 LL K-40 Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 ZrNb-95 Cs-134 Cs-137 BaLa-140 Ra-226 SA-WWA-3E1 01/29/16 < 0.3 < 60 < 7 < 5 < 12 < 8 < 14 < 7 < 6 < 7 < 8 "< 162 02/16/16 < 0.4 < 69 <4 <4 < 8 < 3 < 8 <4 < 4 < 4 < 5 < 105 03/17/16 < 0.6 < 42 < 7 < 7 < 12 < 7 < 13 < 8 < 5 < 6 < 6 < 165 04/13/16 < 0.2 < 128 < 7 < 7 < 11 < 6 < 12 < 7 < 8 < 6 < 5 < 183 05/19/16 < 1.0 < 54 < 6 < 5 < 13 < 6 < 10 < 6 < 5 < 7 < 7 < 154 06/27/16 < 0.5 < 143 < 6 < 6 < 13 < 7 < 11 < 7 < 7 < 7 < 13 < 206 07/26/16 < 0.5 < 46 < 6 < 5 < 12 < 6 < 13 < 6 < 6 < 6 < 9 < 120 08/24/16 < 0.2 < 43 < 2 < 2 < 5 < 2 < 5 < 2 < 2 < 3 < 4 < 56 09/19/16 < 0.7 122 +/- 73 < 6 < 6 < 11 <7 < 12 < 6 < 7 < 7 < 7 < 141 10/24/16 < 0.4 < 31 <4 <4 < 9 <4 < 8 <4 < 4 < 4 < 8 < 85 11/21/16 < 0.3 < 44 < 5 <4 < 12 <5 < 9 < 5 < 4 < 5 < 8 < 99 12/21/16 < 0.9 < 83 < 5 <5 < 10 < 5 < 10 < 5 < 5 < 5 < 6 < 130 AVERAGE* 122 +/- 73

• THE AVERAGE AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES, IF THERE IS ONLY 1 POSITIVE VALUE THE AVERAGE AND THE ERROR ARE DISPLAYED.

• • MANAGEMENT AUDIT SAMPLE: NOT REQUIRED BY ODCM.

- INDICATES AVERAGE WAS NOT CALCULATED DUE TO NO POSITIVE VALUES FOR THE REPORTING PERIOD.

I TABLE C-8 CONCENTRATIONS OF GROSS ALPHA AND GROSS BETA EMITTERS AND TRITIUM IN RAW AND TREATED POTABLE WATER**, 2016 Results in Units of pCi/L +/- 2 Sigma COLLECTION PERIOD STATION ID START STOP Gr-A Gr-8 H-3

~~~~~~~ ~ ~ ~~~~~~~ ~ ;

SA-PWR-2F3 < 1.2 < 2.6 < 194

< 2.3 5.5 +/- 1.9 < 181 02/29/16 - 03/30/16 < 1.0 7.0 +/- 2.1 < 184 03/30/16 - 05/02/16 < 2.4 < 2.9 < 181 05/02/16 - 05/31/16 I < 1.9 4.3 +/- 2.1 < 181 05/31/16 - 06/27/16 ' < 2.4 3.5 +/- 2.3 < 191 06/27/16 - 08/01/16 < 2.0 5.9 +/- 2.1 < 166 08/01/16 - 08/31/16 < 1.9 6.7 +/- 2.1 < 160 08/31/16 - 09/30/16 I < 1.9 4.4 +/- 2.0 < 174 09/30/16 - 10/31/16 < 1.7 4.1 +/- 2.2 < 192 10/31/16 - 11/30/16 < 2.4 5.5 +/- 2.0 < 190 11/30/16 - 01/03/17 I < 2.1 6.8 +/- 2.2 < 193 AVERAGE* 5.4 +/- 2.5 SA-PWT-2F3 01/04/16 " 01/29/16 I < 1.2 5.5 +/- 2.0 < 193 01/29/16 - 02/29/16 < 2.2 5.7 +/- 1.9 < 180 02/29/16 - 03/30/16 < 1.0 5.7 +/- 2.0 < 184 03/30/16 - 05/02/16  : < 2.3 5.7 +/- 2.2 < 181 05/02/16 - 05/31/16 ' < 1.8 5.3 +/- 2.1 < 179 05/31/16 - 06/27/16 < 2.2 5.3 +/- 2.3 < 190 06/27/16 - 08/01/16 < 1.9 6.6 +/- 2.1 < 170 08/01/16 - 08/31/16  : < 1.7 5.7 +/- 1.9 < 160 08/31/16 - 09/30/16 < 1.9 5.2 +/- 2.0 < 176 09/30/16 - 10/31/16 < 1.6 7.0 +/- 2.3 < 191 10/31/16 - 11/30/16  ! < 2.2 6.5 +/- 2.0 < 188 11/30/16 - 01/03/17 < 1.9 7.2 +/- 2.1 < 193 AVERAGE* 6.0 +/- 1.4 I

• THE AVERAGE AND 2 STANDARD DEVl~TION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES.

• • MANAGEMENT AUDIT SAMPLE: NOT REQUIRED BY ODCM.

- INDICATES AVERAGE WAS NOT CALCl'.JLATED DUE TO NO POSITIVE VALUES FOR THE REPORTING PERIOD.

TABLE C-9 CONCENTRATIONS OF IODINE-131 AND GAMMA EMITTERS IN RAW AND TREATED POTABLE WATER, 2016**

Results in Units of pCi/L +/- 2 Sigma COLLECTION PERIOD <-------GAMMA EMITTERS---------->

STATION ID START STOP 1-131 LL K-40 Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 ZrNb-95 Cs-134 Cs-137 BaLa-140 Ra-226 SA-PWR-2F3 01/04/16 - 01/29/16 < 0.4 < 41 < 5 < 5 < 10 < 5 < 9 < 6 < 6 < 5 < 6 < 167 SA-PWR-2F3 01/29/16 - 02/29/16 < 0.6 < 63 <7 < 8 < 14 < 7 < 15 < 6 < 6 <7 <10 <133 SA-PWR-2F3 02/29/16 - 03/30/16 < 0.3 < 116 < 6 < 6 < 12 < 6 < 12 < 6 < 6 <6 <7 <154 SA-PWR-2F3 03/30/16 - 05/02/16 < 0.8 < 140 <7 < 7 < 16 < 7 < 14 < 6 < 7 < 7 < 9 < 178 SA-PWR-2F3 05/02/16 - 05/31 /16 < 0.5 < 144 < 5 < 6 < 7 < 5 < 11 < 5 < 5 < 5 < 7 < 174 SA-PWR-2F3 05/31/16 - 06/27/16 < 0.5 < 131 < 8 < 6 < 12 < 11 < 14 < 6 < 8 < 8 < 8 < 255 SA-PWR-2F3 06/27/16 - 08/01/16 < 0.6 < 126 < 3 < 3 < 8 < 3 <9 <3 <4 < 5 < 8 < 132 SA-PWR-2F3 08/01/16 - 08/31/16 < 0.6 < 37 <4 < 4 < 8 < 3 <9 < 5 < 4 <4 < 8 < 90 SA-PWR-2F3 08/31 /16 - 09/30/16 < 0.3 < 61 < 6 < 7 < 13 < 8 < 14 <8 <7 < 7 < 12 < 145 SA-PWR-2F3 09/30/16 - 10/31 /16 < 0.7 < 122 < 6 < 7 < 13 < 6 < 14 < 9 < 6 <7 <9 .<180 SA-PWR-2F3 10/31/16 - 11/30/16 < 0.6 < 136 < 6 < 5 < 11 < 7 < 10 < 6 < 5 <5 <8 <145 SA-PWR-2F3 11/30/16 - 01/03/17 < 0.6 < 35 <3 < 4 < 8 < 3 < 8 <4 < 3 < 3 < 7 < 107 AVERAGE SA-PWT-2F3 01/04/16 - 01/29/16 < 0.4 < 111 <4 < 6 < 10 < 7 < 11 < 6 <5 < 6 < 7 < 165 SA-PWT-2F3 01/29/16 - 02/29/16 < 0.4 < 53 <5 < 4 < 10 < 3 < 7 <4 <4 <4 < 7 < 142 SA-PWT-2F3 02/29/16 - 03/30/16 < 0.3 < 56 < 6 < 6 < 13 < 6 < 11 <6 <5 < 5 < 6 < 130 SA-PWT-2F3 03/30/16 - 05/02/16 < 0.7 < 171 <4 < 6 < 15 < 7 < 17 < 7 <6 <7 < 9 < 222 SA-PWT-2F3 05/02/16 - 05/31 /16 < 0.3 < 69 <6 < 6 < 7 < 9 < 15 < 5 <6 < 5 < 9 < 141 SA-PWT-2F3 05/31/16 - 06/27/16 < 0.5 < 142 <7 < 7 < 14 < 8 < 14 < 9 <5 < 8 < 11 < 193 SA-PWT-2F3 06/27/16 - 08/01/16 < 0.5 < 158 <5 < 5 < 10 < 6 < 10 < 5 <5 <7 < 12 < 183 SA-PWT-2F3 08/01/16 - 08/31/16 < 0.6 < 124 <5 < 4 < 10 < 5 < 9 < 6 <5 < 6 < 9 < 145 SA-PWT-2F3 08/31 /16 - 09/30/16 < 0.3 < 65 <7 < 6 < 13 < 6 < 14 < 8 <6 < 8 < 9 < 153 SA-PWT-2F3 09/30/16 - 10/31/16 < 0.8 < 59 <7 < 6 < 13 < 6 < 14 < 8 <6 <7 < 11 < 150 SA-PWT-2F3 10/31/16 - 11/30/16 < 0.8 < 115 <7 < 5 < 12 < 7 < 13 < 5 <5 < 6 < 9 < 149 SA-PWT-2F3 11/30/16 - 01/03/17 < 0.7 < 123 <7 < 6 < 15 < 7 < 16 < 7 <5 < 6 < 13 < 159 AVERAGE

• • MANAGEMENT AUDIT SAMPLE: NOT REQUIRED BY ODCM.

- INDICATES AVERAGE WAS NOT CALCULATED DUE TO NO POSITIVE VALUES FOR THE REPORTING PERIOD.

TABLE C-10 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN BROADLEAF VEGETATION (FPL) AND VEGETABLES (FPV), 2016 Results in Units of pCi/kg (wet) +/- 2 Sigma COLLECTION SAMPLE <-------GAMMA EMITTERS---------->

STATION ID DATE TYPE Be-7 K-40 1-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ra-226 Th-232 SA-FPL-1G1 (C) 07/26/16 Cabbage < 375 1,557 +/- 635 < 50 < 42 < 53 < 1,062 < 193 SA-FPL-3H5 (C) 07/26/16 Cabbage < 440 2,634 +/- 811 < 58 < 56 < 48 < 1,230 < 173 SA-FPL-1S1 07/25/16 Kale < 249 2,681 +/- 587 < 56 < 31 < 31 < 648 < 118 SA-FPL-1S1 07/25/16 Cabbage < 348 2,846 +/- 670 < 59 < 37 < 44 < 798 < 191 SA-FPL-1S1 07/25/16 Collards < 227 3,997 +/- 467 < 51 < 31 < 27 < 673 < 100 SA-FPL-1S1 08/31/16 Cabbage < 362 2,604 +/- 690 < 60 < 29 < 26 < 849 < 170 SA-FPL-1S1 08/31/16 Kale < 276 6,539 +/- 684 < 49 < 33 < 33 < 734 < 124 SA-FPL-1S1 08/31/16 Collards < 303 3,356 +/- 621 < 56 < 30 < 34 < 849 < 149 SA-FPL-1S1 09/28/16 Cabbage < 293 2,923 +/- 595 < 54 < 38 < 32 < 718 < 134 SA-FPL-1S1 09/28/16 Collards < 302 4,929 +/- 668 < 48 < 32 < 36 < 814 < 127 SA-FPL-1S1 09/28/16 Kale < 316 5,985 +/- 852 < 53 < 37 < 45 < 740 < 136 SA-FPL-1S1 10/31/16 Kale 393 +/- 86 4,241 +/- 209 < 22 < 11 < 11 < 296 < 34 SA-FPL-1S1 10/31/16 Collards < 218 3,968 +/- 555 < 47 < 23 < 25 < 589 < 100 SA-FPL-1 S1 10/31/16 Cabbage < 328 2,029 +/- 484 < 57 < 32 < 33 < 779 < 116 SA-FPL-1S1 11/30/16 Collards < 240 4,275 +/- 666 < 50 < 37 < 37 < 753 < 153 SA-FPL-1S1 11/30/16 Cabbage < 312 2,546 +/- 576 < 42 < 34 < 32 < 827 < 143 SA-FPL-7S2 07/25/16 Kale < 351 8,761 +/- 966 < 60 < 37 < 45 < 915 < 148 SA-FPL-7S2 07/25/16 Collards < 228 5,858 +/- 631 < 46 < 25 < 28 < 506 < 107 SA-FPL-7S2 07/25/16 Cabbage < 290 5,032 +/- 751 < 58 < 33 < 39 < 644 < 127 SA-FPL-7S2 08/31/16 Collards < 332 7,390 +/- 847 < 59 < 37 < 40 < 744 < 149 SA-FPL-7S2 08/31/16 Cabbage < 302 5,866 +/- 691 < 49 < 30 < 32 < 753 < 136 SA-FPL-7S2 09/28/16 Kale < 342 4,607 +/- 790 < 54 < 41 < 36 < 827 < 195 SA-FPL-7S2 09/28/16 Cabbage < 381 5,319 +/- 793 < 60 < 32 < 36 < 891 < 106 SA-FPL-7S2 09/28/16 Collards < 326 4,897 +/- 700 < 54 < 33 < 38 < 794 < 135 SA-FPL-7S2 10/31/16 Cabbage 234 +/- 134 4,328 +/- 346 < 30 < 15 < 18 < 412 < 67 SA-FPL-7S2 11/30/16 Kale < 302 8,289 +/- 931 < 43 < 28 < 38 < 525 < 130 SA-FPL-7S2 11/30/16 Cabbage < 334 4,130 +/- 714 < 57 < 38 < 43 < 977 < 150 SA-FPL-15S2 07/25/16 Cabbage < 289 2,659 +/- 489 < 59 < 26 < 34 < 636 < 116 SA-FPL-15S2 07/25/16 Kale < 370 4,486 +/- 788 < 52 < 33 < 38 < 675 < 141 SA-FPL-15S2 07/25/16 Collards < 185 3,775 +/- 451 < 29 < 17 < 20 < 429 < 85 SA-FPL-15S2 08/31/16 Kale < 290 4,500 +/- 706 < 54 < 24 < 32 < 690 < 126 SA-FPL-15S2 08/31/16 Collards < 306 3,433 +/- 468 < 60 < 37 < 33 < 856 < 116 SA-FPL-15S2 08/31/16 Cabbage < 276 3,058 +/- 611 < 52 < 37 < 32 < 782 < 123 SA-FPL-15S2 09/28/16 Kale < 286 4,855 +/- 626 < 43 < 27 < 28 < 691 < 121 SA-FPL-15S2 09/28/16 Collards < 309 3,741 +/- 482 < 57 < 39 < 37 < 938 < 132 SA-FPL-15S2 09/28/16 Cabbage < 239 2,963 +/- 532 < 38 < 25 < 29 < 636 < 111 TABLE C-10 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN BROADLEAF VEGETATION (FPL) AND VEGETABLES (FPV), 2016 Results in Units of pCi/kg (wet)+/- 2 Sigma COLLECTION SAMPLE <-----------GAMMA EMITTERS------------>

STATION ID DATE TYPE Be-7 K-40 1-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ra-226 Th-232 SA-FPL-15S2 10/31/16 Collards < 106 2,800 +/- 237 < 20 < 12 < 12 < 206 < 45 SA-FPL-15S2 10/31/16 Kale 230 +/- 68 3,942 +/- 228 < 18 < 9 < 10 < 203 < 34 SA-FPL-15S2 10/31/16 Cabbage 204 +/- 120 3,068 +/- 297 < 30 < 16 < 17 < 379 < 70 SA-FPL-15S2 11/30/16 Collards < 366 3,292 +/- 636 < 57 < 34 < 37 < 874 < 167 SA-FPL-15S2 11/30/16 Cabbage < 276 3,720 +/- 589 < 43 < 31 < 33 < 552 < 132 SA-FPL-15S2 11/30/16 Kale < 366 4,219 +/- 512 < 48 < 33 < 36 < 807 < 126 SA-FPL-16S1 07/25/16 Cabbage < 194 3, 127 +/- 505 < 28 < 20 < 22 < 464 < 82 SA-FPL-16S1 07/25/16 Kale < 271 4,225 +/- 646 < 56 < 27 < 31 < 662 < 127 SA-FPL-16S1 07/25/16 Collards < 253 2,331 +/- 529 < 53 < 29 < 29 < 635 < 116 SA-FPL-16S1 08/31/16 Collards < 295 3,758 +/- 636 < 49 < 32 < 37 < 839 < 121 SA-FPL-16S1 08/31/16 Kale < 326 4,056 +/- 831 < 52 < 36 < 42 < 695 < 166 SA-FPL-1681 08/31/16 Cabbage < 367 4,734 +/- 792 < 57 < 35 < 37 < 797 < 165 SA-FPL-1681 09/28/16 Cabbage < 242 2,742 +/- 478 < 39 < 22 < 26 < 511 < 87 8A-FPL-1681 10/31/16 Kale 396 +/- 197 2,908 +/- 343 < 34 < 18 < 20 < 430 < 71 SA-FPL~1681 10/31/16 Cabbage < 142 3,327 +/- 300 < 32 < 16 < 19 < 472 < 71 SA-FPL-16S1 11/30/16 Kale < 345 1,772 +/- 764 < 60 < 37 < 45 < 802 < 169 8A-FPL-1681 11/30/16 Cabbage* < 316 4,308 +/- 630 < 57 < 36 < 41 < 941 < 168 SA-FPL-10D1 07/25/16 Kale < 299 4,772 +/- 775 < 55 < 28 < 31 < 654 < 126 SA-FPL-10D1 07/25/16 Cabbage < 316 5,750 +/- 672 < 60 < 35 < 37 < 705 < 165 8A-FPL-10D1 07/25/16 Collards < 241 5,345 +/- 650 < 57 < 29 < 33 < 691 < 138 8A-FPL-1 OD1 08/31/16 Collards < 262 3,504 +/- 553 < 53 < 30 < 31 < 633 < 118 SA-FPL-10D1 08/31/16 Cabbage < 310 3,064 +/- 623 < 47 < 29 < 34 < 550 < 141 SA-FPL-10D1 09/28/16 Cabbage < 213 2,219 +/- 568 < 44 < 28 < 24 < 640 < 110 SA-FPL-1 OD1 10/31/16 Cabbage 1,694 +/- 161 4,313 +/- 407 < 40 < 19 < 23 < 498 < 84 SA-FPL-1 OD1 10/31/16 Kale < 187 3,837 +/- 371 < 41 < 21 < 23 < 482 < 74 8A-FPL-1 OD1 11/30/16 Kale < 377 2,743 +/- 602 < 59 < 37 < 41 < 821 < 154 8A-FPL-1 OD1 11/30/16 Cabbage < 263 2,442 +/- 612 < 60 < 39 < 45 < 843 < 166 AVERAGE* 525 +/- 1,158 3,990 +/- 2,898 ALL INDICATOR AVERAGE* 525 +/- 1, 158 4,052 +/- 2,854 TABLE C-10 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN BROADLEAF VEGETATION (FPL) AND VEGETABLES (FPV), 2016 Results in Units of pCi/kg (wet) +/- 2 Sigma COLLECTION SAMPLE <------------GAMMA EMITTERS------------>

STATION ID DATE TYPE Be-7 K-40 1-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ra-226 Th-232 SA-FPV-2F9** 07/12/16 Corn < 110 1,418 +/- 346 < 25 < 17 < 18 < 362 < 66 SA-FPV-2F9** 07/12/16 Tomatoes < 189 1,528 +/- 449 < 29 < 21 < 25 < 421 < 85 SA-FPV-2F9** 08/01/16 Peppers < 261 1,811 +/- 468 < 34 < 25 < 32 < 762 < 147 SA-FPV-2F9** 08/01/16 Peaches < 187 2,215 +/- 473 < 28 < 22 < 20 < 582 < 119 SA-FPV-3F8** 08/01/16 Peaches < 219 1,687 +/- 402 < 28 < 22 < 25 < 544 < 107 SA-FPV-14F4 ** 11/12/16 Soy Bean < 156 14,270 +/- 736 < 27 < 17 < 21 < 392 < 76 SA-FPV-15F4** 08/24/16 Peppers < 299 2,065 +/- 654 < 53 < 29 < 29 < 631 < 142 SA-FPV-15F4** 08/24/16 Corn < 129 1,790 +/- 323 < 30 < 14 < 15 < 394 < 72 SA-FPV-15F4** 08/24/16 Tomatoes < 186 2,511 +/- 404 < 38 < 20 < 23 < 496 < 80 SA-FPV-1G1** 05/02/16 Asparagus < 294 3,091 +/- 672 < 46 < 29 < 45 < 726 < 117 SA-FPV-1G1** 07/26/16 Tomatoes < 245 1,565 +/- 370 < 36 < 32 < 24 < 680 < 94 SA-FPV-1G1** 07/26/16 Peppers < 420 1,931 +/- 695 < 49 < 49 < 39 < 843 < 197 SA-FPV-1 G1 ** 07/26/16 Corn < 281 923 +/- 489 < 37 < 30 < 38 < 620 < 111 SA-FPV-1G1** 07/26/16 Peaches < 175 1,849 +/- 362 < 22 < 16 < 18 < 351 < 84 SA-FPV-2G2** 05/16/16 Asparagus < 183 2,133 +/- 450 < 49 < 21 < 22 < 672 < 117 SA-FPV-2G2** 08/01/16 Peppers < 272 2,069 +/- 502 < 38 < 28 < 32 < 667 < 122 SA-FPV-2G2** 08/01/16 Corn < 247 1,489 +/- 510 < 40 < 31 < 29 < 785 < 130 SA-FPV-2G2** 08/01/16 Tomatoes < 160 2,021 +/- 393 < 25 < 20 < 25 < 501 < 86 SA-FPV-3H5** 07/26/16 Tomatoes < 255 1,155 +/- 488 < 33 < 32 < 29 < 631 < 100 SA-FPV-3H5** 07/26/16 Peppers < 407 2,257 +/- 886 < 52 < 50 < 54 < 858 < 159 SA-FPV-3H5** 07/26/16 Corn < 268 1,143 +/- 537 < 44 < 47 < 43 < 990 < 172 AVERAGE* 2,425 +/- 5,517 (C) CONTROL LOCATION.

• THE AVERAGE AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES.

• • MANAGEMENT AUDIT SAMPLE: NOT REQUIRED BY ODCM.

- INDICATES AVERAGE WAS NOT CALCULATED DUE TO NO POSITIVE VALUES FOR THE REPORTING PERIOD.

TABLE C-11 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN FODDER CROPS**, 2016 Results in Units of pCi/kg (wet)+/- 2 Sigma COLLECTION SAMPLE <-----------GAMMA EMITTERS------------>

DATE TYPE Be-7 K-40 1-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ra-226 Th-232 STATION ID SA-VGT-3G1 (C) 12/27/16 Silage 308 +/- 106 3,565 +/- 386 < 38 < 12 < 14 < 343 < 60 12/19/16 < 224 3,478 +/- 435 < 25 < 23 < 25 < 437 < 103 SA-VGT-13E3 Silage 12/19/16 Silage 293 +/- 118 2,983 +/- 276 < 18 < 15 < 14 < 372 < 61 SA-VGT-14F4 12/27/16 < 194 3, 128 +/- 423 < 55 < 18 < 19 < 484 < 75 SA-VGT-2G3 Silage AVERAGE* 300 +/- 22 3,289 +/- 556 ALL INDICATOR AVERAGE* 293 +/- 118 3,196 +/- 509 (C) CONTROL LOCATION.

• THE AVERAGE AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES, IF THERE IS ONLY 1 POSITIVE VALUE THE AVERAGE AND THE ERROR ARE DISPLAYED.

• • MANAGEMENT AUDIT SAMPLE: NOT REQUIRED BY ODCM.

- INDICATES AVERAGE WAS NOT CALCULATED DUE TO NO POSITIVE VALUES FOR THE REPORTING PERIOD.

TABLE C-12 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN SOIL**, 2016 Results in Units of pCi/kg (dry)+/- 2 Sigma COLLECTION <------------GAMMA EM ITIE RS------------>

STATION ID DATE Be-7 K-40 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ra-226 Th-232 SA-SOL-2G3 12/07/16 < 545 7,074 +/- 1, 113 < 58 < 52 < 1, 164 511 +/- 168 SA-SOL-3G1 12/07/16 < 772 7,955 +/- 1,329 < 71 < 102 < 1,682 645 +/- 270 SA-SOL-7S2 12107/16 < 557 6,844 +/- 1,268 < 67 < 69 < 1,299 358 +/- 150 SA-SOL-1 OD1 12/07/16 < 436 10,050 +/- 1,247 < 49 173 +/- 72 2,750 +/- 1,543 935 +/- 127 SA-SOL-13E3 12/07/16 < 546 16,980 +/- 1,801 < 63 < 108 < 1,367 490 +/- 191 SA-SOL-16E1 12/07/16 < 508 13,360 +/- 1,530 < 56 < 75 2,537 +/- 1,634 699 +/- 164 SA-SOL-2F9 12/07/16 < 523 10,830 +/- 1,169 < 66 < 86 < 1,524 759 +/- 246 SA-SOL-5F1 12/07/16 < 562 7,572 +/- 1,271 < 58 < 98 < 1,672 650 +/- 148 SA-SOL-14F4 12/07/16 < 485 12,870 +/- 1,332 < 47 344 +/- 56 1,499 +/- 874 748 +/- 164 AVERAGE* 10,393 +/- 6,934 259 +/- 242 2,262 +/- 1,339 644 +/- 343

• THE AVERAGE AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES.

• • MANAGEMENT AUDIT SAMPLE: NOT REQUIRED BY ODCM.

- INDICATES AVERAGE WAS NOT CALCULATED DUE TO NO POSITIVE VALUES FOR THE REPORTING PERIOD.

I L_

TABLE C-13 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN GAME**, 2016 Results in Units of pCi/kg (wet) +/- 2 Sigma COLLECTION <------------GAMMA EMITTERS------------>

STATION ID DATE SAMPLE TYPE Be-7 1-131 K-40 Cs-134 Cs-137 SA-GAM-3E1 03/15/16 Muskrat < 37 < 8 2,727 +/- 123 <4 <5 SA-GAM-13E3 02/23/16 Muskrat < 31 < 7 2,855 +/- 230 < 3 <3 AVERAGE* 2,791 +/- 181

• THE AVERAGE AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES.

• • MANAGEMENT AUDIT SAMPLE: NOT REQUIRED BY ODCM.

- INDICATES AVERAGE WAS NOT CALCULATED DUE TO NO POSITIVE VALUES FOR THE REPORTING PERIOb.

TABLE C-14 CONCENTRATIONS OF TRITIUM IN SURFACE WATER, 2016 Results in Units of pCi/L +/- 2 Sigma COLLECTION PERIOD CONTROL INDICATORS START STOP SA-SWA-12C1 (C) SA-SWA-11A1 SA-SWA-7E1 SA-SWA-1F2 SA-SWA-16F1 01/06/16 - 01/20/16 < 191 < 192 < 189 < 190 < 191 02/02/16 - 02/17/16 < 182 < 181 < 179 < 182 < 180 03/08/16 - 03/22/16 < 185 < 186 < 186 < 185 < 187 04/10/16 - 04/21/16 < 195 2,540 + 321 < 198 < 197 < 195 05/03/16 - 05/17/16 < 195 < 177 < 198 < 197 < 195 06/06/16 - 06/25/16 < 175 < 190 < 177 < 176 < 175 07/08/16 - 07/20/16 < 187 < 183 < 191 < 191 < 190 08/03/16 - 08/19/16 < 177 1,600 + 227 < 181 < 183 < 182 09/07/16 - 09/23/16 < 163 < 180 < 163 < 165 < 161 10/06/16 - 10/21/16 < 179 < 178 < 178 < 178 < 176 11/07/16 - 11/23/16 < 177 < 187 < 180 < 180 < 176 12/06/16 - 12/19/16 < 192 < 187 < 190 < 194 < 194 AVERAGE* 2,070 +/- 1,329

• THE AVERAGE AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES.

- INDICATES AVERAGE WAS NOT CALCULATED DUE TO NO POSITIVE VALUES FOR THE REPORTING PERIOD.

TABLE C-15 CONCENTRATIONS OF IODINE-131 AND GAMMA EMITTERS IN SURFACE WATER, 2016 Results in Units of pCi/L +/- 2 Sigma COLLECTION <-------GAMMA EMITTERS--------->

STATION ID DATE 1-131 LL K-40 Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 ZrNb-95 Cs-134 Cs-137 BaLa-140 SA-SWA-12C1 (C) 01/06/16 < 1.0 253 +/- 64 < 4 < 5 < 10 < 5 < 8 < 4 <4 <4 < 6 02/02/16 < 0.5 86 +/- 27 < 2 < 2 <4 < 2 < 4 < 2 <2 < 2 < 3 03/08/16 < 0.6 < 54 < 5 < 6 < 17 < 9 < 17 < 8 < 7 < 8 < 14 04/10/16 < 0.3 < 27 <4 < 4 < 11 < 5 < 9 < 5 <4 < 5 < 7 05/03/16 < 0.5 66 +/- 41 < 2 < 3 < 6 < 2 < 5 < 3 <2 <2 < 5 06/06/16 < 0.5 104 +/- 62 <5 < 5 < 12 < 7 < 12 < 8 < 6 < 7 < 12 07/08/16 < 0.5 < 54 <5 < 5 < 9 < 5 < 11 < 6 <5 < 6 < 8 08/03/16 < 0.3 < 28 < 3 < 3 < 6 < 4 < 6 < 3 < 2 <4 < 7 09/07/16 < 0.7 < 57 <6 < 6 < 16 < 5 < 11 < 7 <7 < 6 < 8 10/06/16 < 0.3 139 +/- 64 <6 < 4 < 10 < 5 < 9 < 6 <4 < 5 < 7 11/07/16 < 0.6 < 44 <4 < 4 < 8 < 5 < 8 < 5 <4 <4 < 6 12/06/16 < 0.6 125 +/- 59 <4 < 4 < 7 < 4 < 8 < 4 <4 <4 < 7 AVERAGE* 129 +/- 133 SA-SWA-11A1 01/06/16 < 0.7 165 +/- 74 <4 < 5 < 10 < 5 < 8 <5 <4 < 5 < 8 02/02/16 < 0.5 85 +/- 48 <4 < 5 <9 < 4 < 8 <4 <4 < 5 < 7 03/08/16 < 0.5 < 70 < 5 < 3 < 13 < 6 < 11 <4 <4 <4 < 5 04/10/16 < 0.3 < 46 < 5 < 5 < 11 < 4 < 10 < 5 < 5 < 5 < 8 05/03/16 < 0.5 < 23 < 2 <2 < 6 < 3 <5 < 3 <2 < 3 < 6 06/06/16 < 0.6 < 58 < 7 < 7 < 13 < 8 < 12 < 5 < 6 < 7 < 4 07/08/16 < 0.5 < 40 < 5 < 6 < 12 < 5 < 14 < 6 < 5 < 6 < 8 08/03/16 < 0.3 < 36 < 3 <4 <7 < 3 < 8 <4 < 3 <4 < 10 09/07/16 < 0.6 124 +/- 55 < 4 < 5 < 12 < 6 < 10 < 5 < 5 < 5 < 7 10/06/16 < 0.3 < 31 < 3 < 3 < 6 < 3 < 6 < 3 < 3 < 3 < 6 11/07/16 < 0.5 < 41 < 4 < 5 < 10 <4 < 11 <5 <4 < 5 < 10 12/06/16 < 0.8 168 +/- 64 < 4 < 4 < 10 <4 < 8 < 5 <4 < 5 < 7 AVERAGE* 135 +/- 78 TABLE C-15 CONCENTRATIONS OF IODINE-131 AND GAMMA EMITTERS IN SURFACE WATER, 2016 Results in Units of pCi/L +/- 2 Sigma COLLECTION <-----------GAMMA EMITTERS------------>

STATION ID DATE 1-131 LL K-40 Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 ZrNb-95 Cs-134 Cs-137 BaLa-140 SA-SWA-7E1 01/06/16 < 0.6 113 +/- 50 <4 < 4 < 11 <4 < 7 < 5 <4 <4 < 7 02/02/16 < 0.5 < 38 <4 < 4 < 7 <4 < 9 <4 <4 <4 <4 03/08/16 < 0.7 < 149 < 8 < 3 < 11 < 6 < 13 < 1 < 5 < 8 < 8 04/10/16 < 0.3 137 +/- 65 < 5 < 5 < 10 < 5 < 13 < 5 <4 < 6 < 9 05/03/16 < 0.6 78 +/- 46 < 3 < 3 < 8 < 3 < 7 < 4 < 3 < 3 < 8 06/06/16 < 0.7 < 52 < 4 < 8 < 12 < 6 < 14 < 5 < 5 < 7 < 7 07/08/16 < 0.6 131 +/- 83 < 7 < 6 < 16 < 6 < 11 < 8 < 6 < 7 < 9 08/03/16 < 0.6 146 +/- 56 < 3 < 3 < 7 < 3 < 6 < 4 < 3 <4 < 7 09/07/16 < 0.6 151 +/- 88 < 6 < 7 < 16 < 7 < 12 < 7 < 5 < 7 < 11 10/06/16 < 0.4 148 +/- 61 < 5 <4 < 12 < 5 < 9 < 6 < 5 < 5 < 9 11/07/16 < 0.7 < 76 < 5 < 6 < 13 < 5 < 12 < 5 < 5 < 6 < 9 12/06/16 < 0.6 106 +/- 59 < 5 < 4 < 8 < 4 < 10 < 4 <4 < 4 < 7 AVERAGE* 126 +/- 51 SA-SWA-1F2 1/6/2016 < 0.7 < 44 < 3 < 4 < 9 < 5 < 7 < 4 <4 < 4 < 8 2/2/2016 < 0.4 < 90 < 3 < 4 < 9 <4 < 9 <4 <4 < 4 < 6 3/8/2016 < 0.6 < 155 <4 < 7 < 10 < 6 < 13 < 5 <4 < 5 < 14 04/10/16 < 0.2 < 47 <4 < 4 < 11 < 3 < 7 <4 <3 < 5 < 6 05/03/16 < 0.5 < 18 < 2 < 2 < 4 <2 <4 < 2 < 2 < 2 < 5 06/06/16 < 0.5 < 93 < 9 < 8 < 18 < 7 < 16 < 9 <7 < 8 < 7 07/08/16 < 0.6 106 +/- 60 < 5 < 4 < 10 < 6 < 10 < 5 <4 < 6 <5 08/03/16 < 0.5 78 +/- 48 < 4 < 4 < 8 <4 < 7 <4 <3 < 3 < 8 09/07/16 < 0.7 < 57 < 6 < 5 < 9 < 7 < 9 < 7 <5 < 5 < 8 10/06/16 < 0.3 127 +/- 58 < 6 < 6 < 13 < 6 < 12 < 6 <5 < 7 < 10 11/07/16 < 0.6 < 48 <4 <4 < 10 <4 < 10 <4 <4 < 5 < 6 12/06/16 < 0.7 111 +/- 54 < 4 <4 < 9 < 3 < 8 < 5 <4 < 4 < 6 AVERAGE* - 105 +/- 41 TABLE C-15 CONCENTRATIONS OF IODINE-131 AND GAMMA EMITTERS IN SURFACE WATER, 2016 Results in Units of pCi/L +/- 2 Sigma COLLECTION <-----------GAMMA EMITTERS------------>

STATION ID DATE 1-131 LL K-40 Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 ZrNb-95 Cs-134 Cs-137 BaLa-140 SA-SWA-16F1 1/6/2016 < 0.9 < 41 < 4 < 3 < 7 < 3 < 7 < 4 <3 < 3 < 6 2/2/2016 < 0.5 < 28 < 3 < 3 < 6 < 3 < 6 < 3 < 3 < 3 < 4 3/8/2016 < 0.7 < 66 < 5 < 7 < 10 < 3 < 14 < 6 < 6 < 7 < 11 04/10/16 < 0.3 < 39 < 4 < 5 < 12 < 6 < 10 < 4 <4 < 5 < 7 05/03/16 < 0.5 < 24 < 3 < 3 <5 < 3 < 5 < 3 <2 < 3 <6 06/06/16 < 0.5 < 282 < 10 < 7 < 22 < 11 < 18 < 9 < 5 < 7 < 11 07/08/16 < 0.5 < 43 < 6 < 5 < 11 < 5 < 11 < 6 < 6 < 6 <6 08/03/16 < 0.4 < 85 < 3 < 2 < 5 < 3 < 5 < 2 <2 < 3 < 4 09/07/16 < 0.7 < 56 < 5 < 5 < 11 < 5 < 13 < 6 < 5 < 6 < 9 10/06/16 < 0.4 128 +/- 84 < 4 < 5 < 10 < 5 < 10 < 6 <4 < 6 < 8 11/07/16 < 0.7 < 40 < 4 < 5 < 12 < 5 < 10 < 5 < 5 < 4 < 10 12/06/16 < 0.5 < 97 < 4 <4 < 9 <4 < 9 < 6 <4 <4 < 5 AVERAGE* 128 +/- 84 ALL INDICATOR AVERAGE* 124 +/- 56

• THE AVERAGE AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES, IF THERE IS ONLY 1 POSITIVE VALUE THE AVERAGE AND THE ERROR ARE DISPLAYED.

- INDICATES AVERAGE WAS NOT CALCULATED DUE TO NO POSITIVE VALUES FOR THE REPORTING PERIOD.

TABLE C-16 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN EDIBLE FISH, 2016 Results in Units of pCi/kg (wet) +/- 2 Sigma COLLECTION <------------GAMMA EMITTERS----------->

STATION ID DATE K-40 Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ra-226 SA-ESF-12C1 (C) 04/25/16 4,353 +/- 1,323 < 89 < 89 < 128 < 81 < 178 < 88 < 94 < 1,293 04/25/16 4,534 +/- 1,111 < 67 < 57 < 117 < 57 < 137 < 67 < 59 < 1,367 10/25/16 3,531 +/- 710 < 38 < 31 < 85 < 37 < 82 < 39 < 48 < 736 10/25/16 4,417 +/- 812 < 49 < 63 < 120 < 61 < 146 < 71 < 60 < 1,431 AVERAGE* 4,209 +/- 916 SA-ESF-11A 1 04/25/16 4,244 +/- 1,315 < 108 < 106 < 200 < 96 < 258 < 73 < 93 < 1,864 10/26/16 3,325 +/- 1, 144 < 82 < 46 < 209 < 85 < 149 < 71 < 62 < 1,382 AVERAGE* 3, 785 +/- 1,300 SA-ESF-7E1 04/25/16 3,505 +/- 1,173 < 84 < 76 < 155 < 90 < 155 < 78 < 83 < 1,871 04/25/16 3,725 +/- 1,182 < 65 < 37 < 157 < 45 < 94 < 50 < 49 < 1, 197 10/26/16 4,668 +/- 1,042 < 37 < 43 < 96 < 58 < 113 < 46 < 52 < 1,211 10/26/16 3,761 +/- 849 < 49 < 67 < 109 < 46 < 143 < 69 < 58 < 1,422 AVERAGE* 3,915 +/- 1,030 ALL INDICATOR AVERAGE* 3,871 +/- 996 (C) CONTROL LOCATION.

• THE AVERAGE AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES.

- INDICATES AVERAGE WAS NOT CALCULATED DUE TO NO POSITIVE VALUES FOR THE REPORTING PERIOD.

TABLE C-17 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN CRABS, 2016 Results in Units of pCi/kg (wet) +/- 2 Sigma COLLECTION <------------GAMMA EM ITIE RS------------>

STATION ID DATE K-40 Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ra-226 SA-ECH-12C1 (C) 07/27/16 3,238 +/- 928 < 48 < 50 < 90 < 64 < 117 < 51 < 64 < 1, 193 08/22/16 2,203 +/- 666 < 48 < 54 < 119 < 50 < 98 < 57 < 52 < 1, 171 AVERAGE* 2, 721 +/- 1,464 SA-ECH-11A1 07/27/16 2,832 +/- 1,185 < 73 < 72 < 117 < 71 < 131 < 74 < 61 < 1,489 08/22/16 3,223 +/- 857 < 47 < 48 < 142 < 37 < 89 < 48 < 46 < 1, 150 AVERAGE* 3,028 +/- 553 (C) CONTROL LOCATION.

• THE AVERAGE AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES.

- INDICATES AVERAGE WAS NOT CALCULATED DUE TO NO POSITIVE VALUES FOR THE REPORTING PERIOD.

TABLE C-18 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN SEDIMENT, 2016 Results in Units of pCi/kg (dry)+/- 2 Sigma COLLECTION <------------GAMMA EMITTERS----------->

STATION ID DATE Be-7 K-40 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ra-226 Th-232 SA-ESS-12C1 (C) 07/05/16 < 936 16,810 +/- 2,424 < 91 < 89 < 1,824 965 +/- 247 11/15/16 < 729 15,620 +/- 1,738 < 60 < 67 2,513 +/- 1,350 1,303 +/- 249 AVERAGE* 16,215 +/- 1,683 2,513 +/- 1,350 1,134 +/- 478 SA-ESS-6S2 07/07/16 < 478 3, 170 +/- 790 < 35 < 45 < 1,087 < 255 11/21/16 < 412 4,340 +/- 742 < 39 < 43 1,465 +/- 763 282 +/- 119 AVERAGE* 3,755 +/- 1,655 1,465 +/- 763 282 +/- 119 SA-ESS-11A1 07/05/16 < 268 2,365 +/- 667 < 27 < 33 < 724 227 +/- 113 11/15/16 < 405 3,690 +/- 660 < 48 < 51 < 939 < 303 AVERAGE* 3,028 +/- 1,874 227 +/- 113 SA-ESS-15A 1 07/05/16 < 714 7, 703 +/- 1,489 < 56 < 79 < 1,018 < 436 11/15/16 < 590 6, 752 +/- 1,052 < 48 < 57 1,883 +/- 1,007 644 +/- 115 AVERAGE* 7,228 +/- 1,345 1,883 +/- 1,007 644 +/- 115 SA-ESS-16A 1 07/05/16 < 483 4,094 +/- 925 < 54 < 57 < 1,433 558 +/- 112 11/15/16 < 621 5,473 +/- 1,016 < 56 < 64 3,012 +/- 1,288 886 +/- 194 AVERAGE* 4,784 +/- 1,950 3,012 +/- 1,288 722 +/- 463 SA-ESS-7E1 07/05/16 < 768 14, 130 +/- 1,875 < 67 < 86 < 2,124 861 +/- 277 11/15/16 < 508 13,210 +/- 1,235 < 73 < 67 < 1,279 849 +/- 146 AVERAGE* 13,670 +/- 1,301 855 +/- 17 SA-ESS-16F1 07/05/16 < 1440 16,410 +/- 3,119 < 93 < 149 < 3,260 1,002 +/- 435 11/15/16 < 833 15,640 +/- 1,791 < 84 < 106 < 1,717 962 +/- 211 AVERAGE* 16,025 +/- 1,089 982 +/- 56 ALL INDICATOR AVERAGE* 8,081 +/- 10,515 2,120 +/- 1,601 697 +/- 576 (C) CONTROL LOCATION.

• THE AVERAGE AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES, IF THERE IS ONLY 1 POSITIVE VALUE THE AVERAGE AND THE ERROR ARE DISPLAYED.

- INDICATES AVERAGE WAS NOT CALCULATED DUE TO NO POSITIVE VALUES FOR THE REPORTING PERIOD.

TABLE C-19 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN OYSTERS**, 2016 Results in Units of pCi/kg (wet)+/- 2 Sigma COLLECTION <------------GAMMA EMITTERS------------>

STATION ID DATE K-40 Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ra-226 SA-EOY-7H1 (C) 06/14/16 < 592 < 77 < 69 < 184 < 64 < 151 < 72 < 83 < 1,363 10/17/16 1,568 +/- 726 < 64 < 64 < 196 < 66 < 136 < 61 < 72 < 1,440 AVERAGE* 1,568 +/- 726 SA-EOY-7C1 06/14/16 1,485 +/- 620 < 47 < 54 < 110 < 39 < 78 < 50 < 50 < 1,093 10/14/16 < 294 < 59 < 58 < 151 < 56 < 135 < 48 < 58 < 1,244 AVERAGE* 1,485 +/- 620 (C) CONTROL LOCATION.

• THE AVERAGE AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES, IF THERE IS ONLY 1 POSITIVE VALUE THE AVERAGE AND THE ERROR ARE DISPLAYED.

• • MANAGEMENT AUDIT SAMPLE: NOT REQUIRED BY ODCM.

- INDICATES AVERAGE WAS NOT CALCULATED DUE TO NO POSITIVE VALUES FOR THE REPORTING PERIOD.

TABLE C-20 Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Duplicate Samples from GEL Sample Date Name Collected Nuclide Result 2 Sigma Units Type SA-APT-5S2 28-Mar-16 Be-7 4.38E-02 +/- 1.03E-02 pCi/m3 Air Sample Composite SA-APT-5S2 27-Jun-16 Be-7 7.68E-02 +/- 1.26E-02 pCi/m3 Air Sample Composite SA-APT-5S2 26-Sep-16 Be-7 6.75E-02 +/- 1.22E-02 pCi/m3 Air Sample Composite SA-APT-5S2 27-Dec-16 Be-7 4.94E-02 +/- 8.50E-03 pCi/m3 Air Sample Composite SA-MLK-14F4 4-Jan-16 K-40 1.42E+03 +/- 4.97E+01 pCi/L Milk SA-MLK-14F4 8-Feb-16 K-40 1.42E+03 +/- 6.15E+01 pCi/L Milk SA-MLK-14F4 7-Mar-16 K-40 1.39E+03* +/- 6.60E+01 pCi/L Milk SA-MLK-14F4 4-Apr-16 K-40 1.77E+03 +/- 7.12E+01 pCi/L Milk SA-MLK-14F4 2-May-16 K-40 1.42E+03 +/- 5.52E+01 pCi/L Milk SA-MLK-14F4 6-Jun-16 K-40 1.41 E+03 +/- 5.77E+01 pCi/L Milk SA-MLK-14F4 13-Jul-16 K-40 1.48E+03 +/- 5.45E+01 pCi/L Milk SA-MLK-14F4 8-Aug-16 K-40 1.34E+03 +/- 5.16E+01 pCi/L Milk SA-MLK-14F4 22-Aug-16 K-40 1.35E+03 +/- 7.95E+01 pCi/L Milk SA-MLK-14F4 6-Sep-16 K-40 1.43E+03 +/- 5.46E+01 pCi/L Milk SA-MLK-14F4 3-0ct-16 K-40 1.38E+03 +/- 5.90E+01 pCi/L Milk SA-MLK-14F4 15-Nov-16 K-40 1.48E+03 +/- 6.37E+01 pCi/L Milk SA-MLK-14F4 5-Dec-16 K-40 1.41 E+03 +/- 5.86E+01 pCi/L Milk SA-SWA-11A1 22-Mar-16 K-40 5.05E+01 +/- 2.65E+01 pCi/L Surface Water SA-SWA-11A1 27-Jun-16 K-40 7.47E+01 +/- 2.12E+01 pCi/L Surface Water SA-SWA-11A1 23-Sep-16 K-40 1.10E+02 +/- 2.69E+01 pCi/L Surface Water SA-SWA-11A1 19-Dec-16 K-40 8.12E+01 +/- 1.44E+01 pCi/L Surface Water SA-FPL-15S2 28-Sep-16 K-40 3.23E+03 +/- 5.39E+02 pCi/Kg Collards SA-FPL-15S2 30-Nov-16 K-40 3.33E+03 +/- 4.16E+02 pCi/Kg Collards SA-FPL-16S1 31-Aug-16 K-40 2.50E+03 +/- 2.18E+02 pCi/Kg Cabbage SA-FPL-1G1 26-Jul-16 K-40 2.43E+03 +/- 2.51 E+02 pCi/Kg Cabbage SA-FPL-3H5 26-Jul-16 K-40 2.25E+03 +/- 2.21E+02 pCi/Kg Cabbage SA-FPL-1S1 31-Aug-16 Be-7 1.36E+02 +/- 9.17E+01 pCi/Kg Kale SA-FPL-1S1 31-Aug-16 K-40 4.47E+03 +/- 3.02E+02 pCi/Kg Kale SA-FPL-1S1 28-Sep-16 K-40 2.46E+03 +/- 4.90E+02 pCi/Kg Cabbage SA-FPL-1S1 31-0ct-16 Be-7 3.62E+02 +/- 1.95E+02 pCi/Kg Cabbage SA-FPL-1S1 31-0ct-16 K-40 2.60E+03 +/- 4.45E+02 pCi/Kg Cabbage SA-FPV-2G2 1-Aug-16 K-40 1.85E+03 +/- 1.66E+02 pCi/Kg Tomatoes SA-FPV-2G2 1-Aug-16 K-40 1.91 E+03 +/- 1.63E+02 pCi/Kg Com SA-FPV-1G1 26-Jul-16 K-40 2.58E+03 +/- 2.30E+02 pCi/Kg Com SA-FPV-2F9 25-Apr-16 K-40 2.18E+03 +/- 1.44E+02 pCi/Kg Asparagus SA-FPV-2F9 12-Jul-16 K-40 1.73E+03 +/- 8.45E+01 pCi/Kg Tomatoes SA-FPV-2F9 12-Jul-16 K-40 2.42E+03 +/- 1.63E+02 pCi/Kg Com SA-FPV-3F8 1-Aug-16 K-40 2.32E+03 +/- 2.18E+02 pCi/Kg Peaches SA-FPV-15F4 24-Aug-16 K-40 1.58E+03 +/- 1.77E+02 pCi/Kg Corn SA-FPV-15F4 24-Aug-16 K-40 1.47E+03 +/- 1.66E+02 pCi/Kg Peppers SA-ESS-11A1 5-Jul-16 K-40 2.50E+03 +/- 1.82E+02 pCi/Kg Sediment SA-ESS-11A1 5-Jul-16 Ra-226 9.30E+01 +/- 2.60E+01 pCi/Kg Sediment SA-ESS-11A1 15-Nov-16 K-40 5.76E+03 +/- 3.12E+02 pCi/Kg Sediment SA-ESS-11A1 15-Nov-16 Ra-226 4.12E+02 +/- 3.49E+01 pCi/Kg Sediment TABLE C-20 Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Duplicate Samples from GEL Sample Date Name Collected Nuclide Result 2 Sigma Units Type SA-SOL-2G3 15-Nov-16 K-40 7.59E+03 +/- 4.88E+02 pCi/Kg Soil SA-SOL-2G3 15-Nov-16 Ra-226 5.50E+02 +/- 5.65E+01 pCi/Kg Soil SA-SOL-2G3 15-Nov-16 Cs-137 2.60E+01 +/- 1.65E+01 pCi/Kg Soil SA-SOL-3G1 15-Nov-16 K-40 5.34E+03 +/- 3.83E+02 pCi/Kg Soil SA-SOL-3G1 15-Nov-16 Ra-226 2.18E+02 +/- 3.40E+01 pCi/Kg Soil SA-SOL-3G1 15-Nov-16 Cs-137 2.60E+01 +/- 1.65E+01 pCi/Kg Soil SA-SOL-7S2 15-Nov-16 K-40 6.28E+03 +/- 3.89E+02 pCi/Kg Soil SA-SOL-7S2 15-Nov-16 Ra-226 2.82E+02 +/- 3.73E+01 pCi/Kg Soil SA-SOL-7S2 15-Nov-16 Cs-137 2.32E+01 +/- 1.78E+01 pCi/Kg Soil SA-ECH-11A1 29-Jul-16 K-40 2.99E+03 +/- 1.99E+02 pCi/Kg Crab SA-ECH-12C1 29-Jul-16 K-40 3.54E+03 +/- 2.46E+02 pCi/Kg Crab SA-ESF-12C1 25-Apr-16 K-40 4.35E+03 +/- 1.16E+02 pCi/Kg Fish (Bass)

FIGURE 1 GROSS BETA ACTIVITY IN AIR PARTICULATES -

QUARTERLY AVERAGE FOR ALL LOCATIONS 2006 THROUGH 2016 1 30.0 25.0 M' ** *

-u

2

a. ***

(")

9 20.0 .

w 0

et:: ** * *

<(

z ** .

> 15.0  ;

I-j:: * **

~ * * ** *

~

w 10.0 ca CJ)

CJ) 0 et::

(!)

5.0 0.0

,_"5~<o 1 - 2013 data included temporary sampling locations FIGURE 2 CESIUM-137 ACTIVITY IN SOIL 1974 THROUGH 2016 (TRIENNIAL) 800 700 T 600

~ *

~ 500

~

(3 Cl Q.

..... 400 ~

M UI

(.)

I T

300 200 100 0

1971 1974 1977 1980 1983 1986 1989 1992 1995 1998 2001 2004 2007 2010 2013 2016 Soil is sampled every three years. Last samples were taken in 2016. Annual values are an average of the results from the ten soil sites.

FIGURE 3 TRITIUM ACTIVITY IN SURFACE WATER - QUARTERLY AVERAGE 2006 THROUGH 2016 10000.00 Effluent discharge near time of sampling: 04-21-16 _____.,.. +

Effluent discharge near time -----+ +

of sampling: 03-05-14 Effluent discharge near ti~ +

of sampling: 08-3-16 1000.00 Effluent discharge near -----+ +

time of sampling: 05-11-12

• +<><><> <> <> <><>. <><><><><> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <>

100.00 r----------------------------------~--------------------------------------------------------------------------------1

Note: For purposes of this chart, when there was no positive detection in the quarter, the LLD was displayed as an open diamond.  :

I I

• -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------~

10.00

• Detectable Tritium (pCi/L) o Lower Limit of Detection (200 pCi/L)

Intentionally left blank APPENDIX D

SUMMARY

OF INTER-LABORATORY COMPARISON PROGRAM .

Intentionally left blank TABLE D-1 ANALYTICS ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY CROSS CHECK PROGRAM TELEDYNE BROWN ENGINEERING ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES (PAGE 1OF3)

Identification Reported Known Ratio (c)

Month/Year Number Matrix Nuclide Units Value (a) Value (b) TSE/Analytics Evaluation (d)

March 2016 E11476 Milk Sr-89 pCi/L 97 86.7 1.12 A Sr-90 pCi/L 15 11.4 1.32 N(2)

E11477 Milk 1-131 pCi/L 85.9 82.2 1.05 A Ce-141 pCi/L 106 98.4 1.08 A Cr-51 pCi/L 255 243 1.05 A Cs-134 pCi/L 134 130 1.03 A Cs-137 pCi/L 174 161 1.08 A Co-58 pCi/L 123 117 1.05 A Mn-54 pCi/L 141 117 1.21 w Fe-59 pCi/L 152 131 1.16 A Zn-65 pCi/L 193 179 1.08 A Co-60 pCi/L 259 244 1.06 A E11479 AP Ce-141 pCi 69 81.1 0.85 A Cr-51 pCi 242 201 1.20 w Cs-134 pCi 98.1 107.0 0.92 A Cs-137 pCi 136 133 1.02 A Co-58 pCi 91.9 97 0.95 A Mn-54 pCi 98.6 96.2 1.02 A Fe-59 pCi 98.8 108 0.91 A

. Zn-65 pCi 131 147 0.89 A Co-60 pCi 209 201 1.04 A E11478 Charcoal 1-131 pCi 85.3 88.3 0.97 A E11480 Water Fe-55 pCi/L 1800 1666 1.08 A June 2016 E11537 Milk Sr-89 pCi/L 94.4 94.4 1.00 A Sr-90 pCi/L 13.4 15.4 0.87 A E11538 Milk 1-131 pCi/L 96.8 94.5 1.02 A Ce-141 pCi/L 129 139 0.93 A Cr-51 pCi/L 240 276 0.87 A Cs-134 pCi/L 157 174 0.90 A Cs-137 pCi/L 117 120 0.98 A Co-58 pCi/L 131 142 0.92 A Mn-54 pCi/L 128 125 1.02 A Fe-59 pCi/L 132 122 1.08 A Zn-65 pCi/L 235 235 1.00 A Co-60 pCi/L 169 173 0.98 A (a) Teledyne Brown Engineering reported result.

(b) The Analytics known value is equal to 100% of the parameter present in the standard as determined by gravimetric and/or volumetric measurements made during standard preparation.

(c) Ratio of Teledyne Brown Engineering to Analytics results.

(d) Analytics evaluation based on TBE internal QC limits: A= Acceptable, reported result falls within ratio limits of 0.80-1.20.

W= Acceptable with warning, reported result falls within 0.70-0.80or1.20-1.30. N =Not Acceptable, reported result falls outside the ratio limits of< 0.70 and > 1.30.

(e) CAP: NCR 16-26 was initiated TABLE D-1 ANALYTICS ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY CROSS CHECK PROGRAM TELEDYNE BROWN ENGINEERING ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES (PAGE 2 OF 3)

Identification Reported Known Ratio (c)

Month/Year Number Matrix Nuclide Units Value(a) Value (bl TSE/Analytics Evaluation (d)

June 2016 E11539 Charcoal 1-131 pCi 86.1 89.4 0.96 A E11540 AP Ce-141 pCi 105 99.8 1.05 A Cr-51 pCi 216 198.0 1.09 A Cs-134 pCi 113 125 0.90 A Cs-137 pCi 94.5 86.6 1.09 A Co-58 pCi 101 102 0.99 A Mn-54 pCi 88.8 90.2 0.98 A Fe-59 pCi 82 87.5 0.94 A Zn-65 pCi 174 169 1.03 A Co-60 pCi 143 124 1.15 A E11541 Water Fe-55 pCi/L 164 186 0.88 A September 2016 E11609 Milk Sr-89 pCi/L 90 90.9 0.99 A Sr-90 pCi/L 13.3 13.7 0.97 A E11610 Milk 1-131 pCi/L 80.4 71.9 1.12 A Ce-141 pCi/L 81.3 93 0.87 A Cr-51 pCi/L 198 236 0.84 A Cs-134 pCi/L 122 136 0.90 A Cs-137 pCi/L 119 119 1.00 A Co-58 pCi/L 92.2 97.4 0.95 A Mn-54 pCi/L 156 152 1.03 A Fe-59 pCi/L 97.5 90.6 1.08 A Zn-65 pCi/L 189 179 1.06 A Co-60 pCi/L 131 135 0.97 A E11611 Charcoal 1-131 pCi 52.4 59.9 0.87 A E11612 AP Ce-141 pCi 67.5 63.6 1.06 A Cr-51 pCi 192 161.0 1.19 A Cs-134 pCi 91.4 92.6 0.99 A Cs-137 pCi 93.9 80.8 1.16 A Co-58 pCi 66 66.4 0.99 A Mn-54 pCi 104 104 1.00 A Fe-59 pCi 60.5 61.8 0.98 A Zn-65 pCi 140 122 1.15 A Co-60 pCi 119 91.9 1.29 w (a) Teledyne Brown Engineering reported result.

(b) The Analytics known value is equal to 100% of the parameter present in the standard as determined by gravimetric and/or volumetric measurements made during standard preparation.

(c) Ratio of Teledyne Brown Engineering to Analytics results.

(d) Analytics evaluation based on TBE internal QC limits: A= Acceptable, reported result falls within ratio limits of 0.80-1.20.

W= Acceptable with warning, reported result falls within 0.70-0.80 or 1.20-1.30. N =Not Acceptable, reported result falls outside the ratio limits of< 0. 70 and > 1.30.

TABLE D-1 ANALYTICS ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY CROSS CHECK PROGRAM TELEDYNE BROWN ENGINEERING ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES (PAGE 3 OF 3)

Identification Reported Known Ratio (c)

Month/Year Number Matrix Nuclide Units Value(a) Value (b) TBE/Analytics Evaluation (d)

September 2016 E11613 Water Fe-55 pCi/L 1990 1670 1.19 A E11614 Soil Ce-141 pCi/g 0.153 0.175 0.87 A Cr-51 pCi/g 0.482 0.441 1.09 A Cs-134 pCi/g 0.270 0.254 1.06 A Cs-137 pCi/g 0.313 0.299 1.05 A Co-58 pCi/g 0.177 0.182 0.97 A Mn-54 pCi/g 0.340 0.285 1.19 A Fe-59 pCi/g 0.206 0.17 1.21 w Zn-65 pCi/g 0.388 0.335 1.16 A Co-60 pCi/g 0.284 0.252 1.13 A December 2016 E11699 Milk Sr-89 pCi/L 95 74.2 1.28 w Sr-90 pCi/L 14.7 10 1.47 N(3)

E11700 Milk 1-131 pCi/L 97.5 97.4 1.00 A Ce-141 pCi/L 136 143 0.95 A Cr-51 pCi/L 247 280 0.88 A Cs-134 pCi/L 164 178 0.92 A Cs-137 pCi/L 120 126 0.95 A Co-58 pCi/L 139 146 0.95 A Mn-54 pCi/L 126 129 0.98 A Fe-59 pCi/L 114 125 0.91 A Zn-65 pCi/L 237 244 0.97 A Co-60 pCi/L 168 178 0.94 A E11701' Charcoal 1-131 pCi 95.6 98 0.98 A E11702 AP Ce-141 pCi 91.7 97.7 0.94 A Cr-51 pCi 210 192.0 1.09 A Cs-134 pCi 122 122 1.00 A Cs-137 pCi 93.9 86.4 1.09 A Co-58 pCi 92 100 0.92 A Mn-54 pCi 93.7 88.5 1.06 A Fe-59 pCi 84.9 84.5 1.00 A Zn-65 pCi 176 167 1.05 A Co-60 pCi 151 122 1.24 w E11702 AP Sr-89 pCi 79.1 92 0.86 A Sr-90 pCi 10 12.5 0.80 A E11703 Water Fe-55 pCi/L 2180 1800 1.21 w (a) Teledyne Brown Engineering reported result.

(b) The Analytics known value is equal to 100% of the parameter present in the standard as determined by gravimetric and/or volumetric measurements made during standard preparation.

(c) Ratio of Teledyne Brown Engineering to Analytics results.

(d) Analytics evaluation based on TBE internal QC limits: A= Acceptable, reported result falls within ratio limits of 0.80-1.20.

W= Acceptable with warning, reported result falls within 0.70-0.80 or 1.20-1.30. N =Not Acceptable, reported result falls outside the ratio limits of< 0. 70 and> 1.30.

(e) CAP: NCR 16-35 was initiated TABLE D-2 DOE's MIXED ANALYTE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION PROGRAM (MAPEP)

TELEDYNE BROWN ENGINEERING ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES (PAGE 1OF1)

Identification Reported Known Acceptance Month/Year Number Media Nuclide Units Value (a) Value (b) Range Evaluation (c)

March 2016 16-MaW34 Water Am-241 Sq/L 0.008 (1) A Ni-63 Sq/L 12.4 12.3 8.6 - 16.0 A Pu-238 Sq/L 1.4900 1.2440 0.871 - 1.617 A Pu-239/240 Sq/L 0.729 0.641 0.449 - 0.833 A 16-MaS34 Soil Ni-63 Sq/kg 1140 1250.0 875 -1625 A Sr-90 Sq/kg 8.15 (1) A 16-RdF34 AP U-234/233 Sq/sample 0.1620 0.1650 0.116-0.215 A U-238 Sq/sample 0.163 0.172 0.120 - 0.224 A 16-GrF34 AP Gr-A Sq/sample 0.608 1.20 0.36 - 2.04 A Gr-S Sq/sample 0.8060 0.79 0.40-1.19 A 16-RdV34 Vegetation Cs-134 Sq/sample 10.10 10.62 7.43-13.81 A Cs-137 Sq/sample 6.0 5.62 3.93 - 7.31 A Co-57 Sq/sample 13.3000 11.8 8.3 - 15.3 A Co-60 Sq/sample 0.013 (1) A Mn-54 Sq/sample 0.0150 (1) A Sr-90 Sq/sample 0.301 (1) N(4)

Zn-65 Sq/sample 10.500 9.6 6.7-12.5 A September 2016 16-MaW35 Water Am-241 Sq/L 0.626 0.814 .570 -1058 w Ni-63 Sq/L 12.4 17.2 12.0 - 22.4 A Pu-238 Sq/L 1.23 1.13 0.79 - 1.47 w Pu-239/240 Sq/L 0.0318 0.013 (1) A 16-MaS35 Soil Ni-63 Sq/kg 724 990 693 -1287 A Sr-90 Sq/kg 747 894 626 - 1162 A 16-RdF35 AP U-234/233 Sq/sample 0.160 0.15 0.105- 0.195 A U-238 Sq/sample 0.157 0.156 0.109 - 0.203 A 16-RdV35 Vegetation Cs-134 Sq/sample -0.103 (1) A Cs-137 Sq/sample 5.64 5.54 3.88 - 7.20 A Co-57 Sq/sample 7.38 6.81 4.77 - 8.85 A Co-60 Sq/sample 4.81 4.86 3.40 - 6.32 A Mn-54 Sq/sample 7.4 7.27 5.09 - 9.45 A Sr-90 Sq/sample 0.774 0.80 0.56-1.04 A Zn-65 Sq/sample 5.46 5.4 3.78 - 7.02 A (1) False positive test.

(a) Teledyne Brown Engineering reported result.

(b) The MAPEP known value is equal to 100% of the parameter present in the standard as determined by gravimetric and/or volumetric measurements made during standard preparation.

(c) DOEIMAPEP evaluation: A=acceptable, W=acceptable with warning, N=not acceptable.

(4) CAP: NCR 16-14 was initiated

- 100 -

TABLE D-3 ERA ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY CROSS CHECK PROGRAM TELEDYNE BROWN ENGINEERING ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES (PAGE 1OF1)

Identification Reported Known Acceptance Month/Year Number Media Nuclide Units Value (a) Value (bl Limits Evaluation (c)

May 2016 RAD-105 Water Sr-89 pCi/L 48.9 48.2 37.8 - 55.6 A Sr-90 pCi/L 25.0 28.5 20.7- 33.1 A Ba-133 pCi/L 53.1 58.8 48.7 - 64.9 A Cs-134 pCi/L 40.9 43.3 34.6-47.6 A Cs-137 pCi/L 84.8 78.4 70.6- 88.9 A Co-60 pCi/L 108 102 91.8 - 114 A Zn-65 pCi/L 226 214 193- 251 A Gr-A pCi/L 38.9 62.7 32.9 - 77.8 A Gr-B pCi/L 41.9 39.2 26.0 - 46.7 A 1-131 pCi/L 24.1 26.6 22.1 - 31.3 A U-Nat pCi/L 4.68 4.64 3.39 - 5.68 A H-3 pCi/L 7720 7840 6790 - 8620 A November 2016 RAD-107 Water Sr-89 pCi/L 43.0 43.3 33.4- 50.5 A Sr-90 pCi/L 30.0 33.6 24.6 - 38.8 A Ba-133 pCi/L 47.8 54.9 45.4 - 60.7 A Cs-134 pCi/L 72.9 81.8 67.0 - 90.0 A Cs-137 pCi/L 189 210 189 - 233 A Co-60 pCi/L 58.4 64.5 58.0 - 73.4 A Zn-65 pCi/L 243 245 220 - 287 A Gr-A pCi/L 37.2 68.4 35.9 - 84.5 A Gr-B pCi/L 35.1 33.9 22.1 - 41.6 A 1-131 pCi/L 23.5 26.3 21.9 - 31.0 A U-Nat pCi/L 49.2 51.2 41.6 - 56.9 A H-3 pCi/L 918 9820 8540-10800 N(5)

MRAD-25 AP Gr-A pCi/Filter 56.8 71.2 23.9 - 111 A (a) Teledyne Brown Engineering reported result.

(b) The ERA known value is equal to 100% of the parameter present in the standard as determined by gravimetric and/or volumetric measurements made during standard preparation.

(c) ERA evaluation: A=acceptable. Reported result falls within the Warning Limits. N=not acceptable. Reported result falls outside of the Control Limits. CE=check for Error. Reported result falls within the Control Limits and outside of the Warning Limit.

(5) CAP: NCR 16-34 was initiated

- 101 -

Table D-4 GEL 2016 ECKERT & ZIEGLER ANALYTICS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION RESULTS

\i',,uNi~ ,1~Ju~~cJv*~: *~tj~t~~r j; ,.'\.~~~!l!J,taii.siir

>:~*.:,;

PT

.: Provider

.Quarter!

• Year

Report

• .>Date

\;~ Sa.nipfe

• • Number

'Sampie ,;

• Medi!lj'

• ~~~:

\,,,\d{'

• Ra,rge/ Ri!tio

• Evaluation**.

EZA 4th/2015 2/18/2016 E11412 Cartridge pCi 1-131 7.73E+01 7.98E+01 0.97 A EZA 4th/2015 2/18/2016 E11413 Milk pCi/L Sr-89 9.41E+01 8.68E+01 1.08 A EZA 4th/2015 2/18/2016 E11413 Milk pCi/L Sr-90 9.74E+OO 1.25E+01 0.78 A EZA 4th/2015 2/18/2016 E11414 Milk pCi/L 1-131 1.01E+02 9.12E+01 1.11 A EZA 4th/2015 2/18/2016 E11414 Milk pCi/L Ce-141 1.36E+02 1.29E+02 1.06 A EZA 4th/2015 2/18/2016 E11414 Milk pCi/L Cr-51 2.79E+02 2.81 E+02 0.99 A EZA 4th/2015 2/18/2016 E11414 Milk pCi/L Cs-134 1.45E+02 1.60E+02 0.91 A EZA 4th/2015 2/18/2016 E11414 Milk pCi/L Cs-137 1.15E+02 1.15E+02 1.00 A EZA 4th/2015 2/18/2016 E11414 Milk pCi/L Co-58 1.06E+02 1.10E+02 0.96 A EZA 4th/2015 2/18/2016 E11414 Milk pCi/L Mn-54 1.53E+02 1.45E+02 1.06 A EZA 4th/2015 2/18/2016 E11414 Milk pCi/L Fe-59 1.19E+02 1.08E+02 1.10 A EZA 4th/2015 2/18/2016 E11414 Milk pCi/L Zn-65 2.69E+02 2.48E+02 1.08 A EZA 4th/2015 2/18/2016 E11414 Milk pCi/L Co-60 2.12E+02 2.13E+02 0.99 A EZA 4th/2015 2/18/2016 E11415 Water pCi/L 1-131 1.05E+02 9.26E+01 1.13 A EZA 4th/2015 2/18/2016 E11415 Water pCi/L Ce-141 1.27E+02 1.12E+02 1.14 A EZA 4th/2015 2/18/2016 E11415 Water pCi/L Cr-51 2.60E+02 2.44E+02 1.07 A EZA 4th/2015 2/18/2016 E11415 Water pCi/L Cs-134 1.25E+02 1.39E+02 0.90 A EZA 4th/2015 2/18/2016 E11415 Water pCi/L Cs-137 1.12E+02 9.95E+01 1.13 A EZA 4th/2015 2/18/2016 E"l1415 Water pCi/L Co-58 9.73E+01 9.56E+01 1.02 A EZA 4th/2015 2/18/2016 E11415 Water pCi/L Mn-54 1.41E+02 1.26E+02 1.12 A EZA 4th/2015 2/18/2016 E11415 Water pCi/L Fe-59 1.11E+02 9.34E+01 1.19 A EZA 4th/2015 2/18/2016 E11415 Water pCi/L Zn-65 2.43E+02 2.15E+02 1.13 A EZA 4th/2015 2/18/2016 E11415 Water pCi/L Co-60 1.92E+02 1.85E+02 1.04 A EZA 1st/2016 5/16/2015 E11445 Cartridge pCi 1-131 9.39E+01 8.86E+01 1.06 A EZA 1st/2016 5/16/2015 E11446 Milk pCi/L Sr-89 8.16E+01 8.67E+01 0.94 A EZA 1st/2016 5/16/2015 E11446 Milk pCi/L Sr-90 1.08E+01 1.14E+01 0.95 A EZA 1st/2016 5/16/2015 E11447 Milk pCi/L 1-131 9.41E+01 8.22E+01 1.15 A EZA 1st/2016 5/16/2015 E11447 Milk pCi/L Ce-141 1.05E+02 9.84E+01 1.07 A EZA 1st/2016 5/16/2015 E11447 Milk pCi/L Cr-51 2.69E+02 2.43E+02 1.11 A EZA 1st/2016 5/16/2015 E11447 Milk pCi/L Cs-134 1.13E+02 1.30E+02 0.87 A EZA 1st/2016 5/16/2015 E11447 Milk pCi/L Cs-137 1.64E+02 1.61E+02 1.02 A

- 102 -

Table D-4 (CONT.)

GEL 2016 ECKERT & ZIEGLER ANALYTICS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION RESULTS

,f_PT ,

., ~'Ye~~~:;,::, Report Sample sample

~'unit~# **~ 'Nuc.Jide A!latY\~i ;:;iG.E,'-. Known ..

<,, \-~: .value}:

,, '.' Acceptance ..

E5ar~~tio~\

Jf'ravide( Q.~t~ Number M11dia .R13ngef,R,atio ' ,, >:

EZA 1st/2016 5/16/2015 E11447 Milk pCi/L Co-58 1.16E+02 1.17E+02 0.99 A EZA 1st/2016 5/16/2015 E11447 Milk pCi/L Mn-54 1.24E+02 1.17E+02 1.06 A EZA 1st/2016 5/16/2015 E11447 Milk pCi/L Fe-59 1.47E+02 1.31E+02 1.12 A EZA 1st/2016 5/16/2015 E11447 Milk pCi/L Zn-65 1.98E+02 1.79E+02 1.11 A EZA 1st/2016 5/16/2015 E11447 Milk pCi/L Co-60 2.59E+02 2.44E+02 1.06 A EZA 1st/2016 5/16/2015 E11448 Water pCi/L 1-131 9.92E+01 9.67E+01 1.03 A EZA 1st/2016 5/16/2015 E11448 Water pCi/L Ce-141 1.40E+02 1.39E+02 1.01 A EZA 1st/2016 5/16/2015 E11448 Water pCi/L Cr-51 3.95E+02 3.66E+02 1.08 A EZA 1st/2016 5/16/2015 E11448 Water pCi/L Cs-134 1.12E+02 1.26E+02 0.89 A EZA 1st/2016 5/16/2015 E11448 Water pCi/L Cs-137 1.69E+02 1.67E+02 1.01 A EZA 1st/2016 5/16/2015 E11448 Water pCi/L Co-58 1.78E+02 1.80E+02 0.99 A EZA 1st/2016 5/16/2015 E11448 Water pCi/L Mn-54 1.66E+02 1.59E+02 1.05 A EZA 1st/2016 5/16/2015 E11448 Water pCi/L Fe-59 2.14E+02 1.95E+02 1.01 A EZA 1st/2016 5/16/2015 E11448 Water pCi/L Zn-65 3.25E+02 2.99E+02 1.09 A EZA 1st/2016 5/16/2015 E*l1448 Water pCi/L Co-60 3.23E+02 3.28E+02 0.98 A EZA 1st/2016 5/16/2015 E11449 Water pCi/L Nb-95 4.01E+03 .3.62E+03 1.11 A EZA 1st/2016 5/16/2015 E11449 Water pCi/L Zr-95 9.79E+03 9.48E+03 1.03 A EZA 1st/2016 5/16/2015 E11449 Water pCi/L Tc-99M 1.34E+03 1.32E+03 1.02 A EZA 1st/2016 5/16/2015 E11449 Water pCi/L Ru-103 6.33E+03 6.23E+03 1.02 A EZA 1st/2016 5/16/2015 E11449 Water pCi/L 1-131 4.64E+03 4.83E+03 0.96 A EZA 1st/2016 5/16/2015 E11449 Water pCi/L 1-132 1.39E+03 1.62E+03 0.86 A EZA 1st/2016 5/16/2015 E11449 Water pCi/L Te-132 1.81E+03 1.50E+03 1.21 A EZA 1st/2016 5/16/2015 E11449 Water pCi/L Cs-137 7.79E+01 7.31E+01 1.07 A EZA 1st/2016 5/16/2015 E11449 Water pCi/L Ba-140 1.89E+04 1.85E+04 1.02 A EZA 1st/2016 5/16/2015 E11449 Water pCi/L La-140 2.11E+04 2.06E+04 1.03 A EZA 1st/2016 5/16/2015 E11449 Water pCi/L Ce-141 1.43E+04 1.39E+04 1.03 A EZA 1st/2016 5/16/2015 E11449 Water pCi/L Ce-144 2.20E+03 2.08E+03 1.06 A EZA 1st/2016 5/16/2015 E11449 Water pCi/L Nd-147 6.40E+03 6.19E+03 1.03 .A EZA 2nd/2016 7/27/2016 E11573 Cartridge pCi 1-131 9.52E+01 8.94E+01 1.07 A EZA 2nd/2016 7/27/2016 E11574 Milk pCi/L Sr-89 8.51E+01 9.44E+01 0.90 A EZA 2nd/2016 7/27/2016 E11574 Milk pCi/L Sr-90 9.49E+01 1.54E+01 0.62 A

- 103 -

Table D-4 (CONT.)

GEL 2016 ECKERT & ZIEGLER ANALYTICS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION RESULTS PT

. Provider Quarter/

Year

• .Report Dafe Sample Number sample Media

• uria ::*,,*'Analytef

.. *.:. .,*;GEL'h;.

. Nuclide* )'. j~~:~]~~: ** A~sepia!J!fe

'.**.~ange(J~,atio

• evaluation EZA 2nd/2016 7/27/2016 E11575 Milk pCi/L 1-131 9.77E+01 9.45E+01 1.03 A EZA 2nd/2016 7/27/2016 E11575 Milk pCi/L Ce-141 1.46E+02 1.39E+02 1.05 A EZA 2nd/2016 7/27/2016 E11575 Milk pCi/L Cr-51 2.53E+02 2.76E+02 0.92 A EZA 2nd/2016 7/27/2016 E11575 Milk pCi/L Cs-134 1.62E+02 1.74E+02 0.93 A EZA 2nd/2016 7/27/2016 E11575 Milk pCi/L Cs-137 1.20E+02 1.20E+02 1.00 A EZA 2nd/2016 7/27/2016 E11575 Milk pCi/L Co-58 1.39E+02 1.42E+02 0.98 A EZA 2nd/2016 7/27/2016 E11575 Milk pCi/L Mn-54 1.26E+02 1.25E+02 1.00 A EZA 2nd/2016 7/27/2016 E11575 Milk pCi/L Fe-59 1.25E+02 1.22E+02 1.03 A EZA 2nd/2016 7/27/2016 E11575 Milk pCi/L Zn-65 2.47E+02 2.35E+02 1.05 A EZA 2nd/2016 7/27/2016 E11575 Milk pCi/L Co-60 1.72E+02 1.73E+02 1.00 A EZA 2nd/2016 7/27/2016 E11576 Water pCi/L 1-131 1.02E+02 9.67E+01 1.05 A EZA 2nd/2016 7/27/2016 E11576 Water pCi/L Ce-141 1.56E+02 1.47E+02 1.06 A EZA 2nd/2016 7/27/2016 E11576 Water pCi/L Cr-51 3.33E+02 2.92E+02 1.14 A EZA 2nd/2016 7/27/2016 E11576 Water pCi/L Cs-134 1.65E+02 1.85E+02 0.89 A EZA 2nd/2016 7/27/2016 E11576 Water pCi/L Cs-137 1.34E+02 1.28E+02 1.05 A EZA 2nd/2016 7/27/2016 E11576 Water pCi/L Co-58 1.47E+02 1.51E+02 0.98 A EZA 2nd/2016 7/27/2016 E11576 Water pCi/L Mn-54 1.45E+02 1.33E+02 1.09 A EZA 2nd/2016 7/27/2016 E11576 Water pCi/L Fe-59 1.54E+02 1.29E+02 1.19 A EZA 2nd/2016 7/27/2016 E'l1576 Water pCi/L Zn-65 2.72E+02 2.49E+02 1.09 A EZA 2nd/2016 7/27/2016 E11576 Water pCi/L Co-60 1.99E+02 1.83E+02 1.09 A EZA 3rd/2016 11/28/2016 E11605 Cartridge pCi 1-131 6.33E+01 6.01E+01 1.05 A EZA 3rd/2016 11/28/2016 E'l1606 Milk pCi/L Sr-89 7.60E+01 9.09E+01 0.84 A EZA 3rd/2016 11/28/2016 E11606 Milk pCi/L Sr-90 1.17E+01 1.37E+01 0.85 A EZA 3rd/2016 11/28/2016 . E11607 Milk pCi/L 1-131 7.53E+01 7.19E+01 1.05 A EZA 3rd/2016 11/28/2016 E11607 Milk pCi/L Ce-141 9.85E+01 9.32E+01 1.06 A EZA 3rd/2016 11/28/2016 E11607 Milk pCi/L Cr-51 2.63E+02 2.36E+02 1.12 A EZA 3rd/2016 11/28/2016 E11607 Milk pCi/L Cs-134 1.21E+02 1.36E+02 0.89 A EZA 3rd/2016 11/28/2016 E11607 Milk pCi/L Cs-137 1.19E+02 1.19E+02 1.00 A EZA 3rd/2016 11/28/2016 E11607 Milk pCi/L Co-58 9.56E+01 9.74E+01 0.98 A EZA 3rd/2016 11/28/2016 E11607 Milk pCi/L Mn-54 1.61E+02 1.52E+02 1.06 A EZA 3rd/2016 11/28/2016 E11607 Milk pCi/L Fe-59 9.00E+01 9.06E+01 0.99 A EZA 3rd/2016 11/28/2016 E11607 Milk pCi/L Zn-65 2.11E+02 1.79E+02 1.18 A

- 104 -

Table D-4 (CONT.)

GEL 2016 ECKERT & ZIEGLER ANALYTICS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION RESULTS

• '.'pT 9~~~r;F,: *sample Sample* i* i *. .

'.AriilJYfe I S GEL* Known.*. *Acceptance . :: *. e~'a1J.1ii~1i' Provider.* *.* ';~~~~\*

• Numbei'. l\lledia;" Unit, *;~ ~ 1:'Nuclitle v;ijtje,>: '.R~~9e/ R~uo;  :.c~*,<' >'<*',*c

• EZA 3rd/2016 11/28/2016 E11607 Milk pCi/L Co-60 1.44E+02 1.35E+02 1.07 A EZA 3rd/2016 11/28/2016 E11068 Water pCi/L 1-131 5.53E+01 4.90E+01 1.13 A EZA 3rd/2016 11/28/2016 E11068 Water pCi/L Ce-141 9.49E+01 8.52E+01 1.11 A EZA 3rd/2016 11/28/2016 E11068 Water pCi/L Cr-51 2.03E+02 2.15E+02 0.95 A EZA 3rd/2016 11/28/2016 E11068 Water pCi/L Cs-134 1.20E+02 1.24E+02 0.97 A EZA 3rd/2016 11/28/2016 E11068 Water pCi/L Cs-137 1.15E+02 1.08E+02 1.06 A EZA 3rd/2016 11/28/2016 E11068 Water pCi/L Co-58 9.54E+01 8.90E+01 1.07 A EZA 3rd/2016 11/28/2016 E11068 Water pCi/L Mn-54 1.47E+02 1.39E+02 1.06 A EZA 3rd/2016 11/28/2016 E11068 Water pCi/L Fe-59 8.73E+01 8.28E+01 1.05 A EZA 3rd/2016 11/28/2016 E11068 Water pCi/L Zn-65 1.79E+02 1.63E+02 1.10 A EZA 3rd/2016 11/28/2016 E11068 Water pCi/L Co-60 1.26E+02 1.23E+02 1.02 A*

A= Acceptable N = Not Acceptable

- 105 -

Table D-5 GEL 2016 DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY MIXED ANALYTE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION PROGRAM (MAPEP) RESULTS

• • • vear*** ***~~~!!\ s;.****~~~~~Jr ;Media;*

PT tiuartlirf: **sifinple ' If Analyt~;/ *i~(;EL . Known *Acceptance*. * *e~alu~tion * .

. P,rovider 'vnit Nuclida .value Rangel Ratio MAPEP 2nd/2016 6/2/2016 16-GrF34 Filter Bq/sample Gr-A 1.41 1.2 0.36-2.04 A MAPEP 2nd/2016 6/2/2016 16-GrF34 Filter Bq/sample Gr-B 0.897 0.79 0.40-1.19 A MAPEP 2nd/2016 6/2/2016 16-MaS34 Soil Bq/Kg Am-241 111 103 72-134 A MAPEP 2nd/2016 6/2/2016 16-MaS34 Soil Bq/Kg. Cs-134 953 1,030 721-1,339 A MAPEP 2nd/2016 6/2/2016 16-MaS34 Soil Bq/Kg Cs-137 2.57 N/A False Pos Test A MAPEP 2nd/2016 6/2/2016 16-MaS34 Soil Bq/Kg Co-57 1,030 992 694-1,290 A MAPEP 2nd/2016 6/2/2016 16-MaS34 Soil Bq/Kg Co-60 1,270 1,190 833-1,547 A MAPEP 2nd/2016 6/2/2016 16-MaS34 Soil Bq/Kg Fe-55 197 428 300-556 N(1)

MAPEP 2nd/2016 6/2/2016 16-MaS34 Soil Bq/Kg Mn-54 1,230 1,160 812-1,508 A MAPEP 2nd/2016 6/2/2016 16-MaS34 Soil Bq/Kg Ni-63 1,240 1,250 875-1,625 A MAPEP 2nd/2016 6/2/2016 16-MaS34 Soil Bq/Kg Pu-238 60.1 63.6 44.5-82.7 A MAPEP 2nd/2016 6/2/2016 16-MaS34 Soil Bq/Kg Pu- 239/240 1.15 0.21 Sens. Eval A MAPEP 2nd/2016 6/2/2016 16-MaS34 Soil Bq/Kg K-40 680 607 425-789 A MAPEP 2nd/2016 6/2/2016 16-MaS34 Soil Bq/Kg Sr-90 -3.4 N/A False Pos Test A MAPEP 2nd/2016 6/2/2016 16-MaS34 Soil Bq/Kg Tc-99 32 N/A False Pos Test A MAPEP 2nd/2016 6/2/2016 16-MaS34 Soil Bq/Kg U-234/233 49 45.9 32.1-59.7 A MAPEP 2nd/2016 6/2/2016 16-MaS34 Soil Bq/Kg U-238 143 146 102-190 A MAPEP 2nd/2016 6/2/2016 16-MaS34 Soil Bq/Kg Zn-65 785 692 484-900 A MAPEP 2nd/2016 6/2/2016 16-MaW34 Water Bq/L Am-241 0.0113 N/A False Pos Test A MAPEP 2nd/2016 6/2/2016 16-MaW34 Water Bq/L Cs-134 15 16.1 11.3-20.9 A MAPEP 2nd/2016 6/2/2016 16-MaW34 Water Bq/L Cs-137 21.8 21.2 14.8-27.6 A MAPEP 2nd/2016 6/2/2016 16-MaW34 Water Bq/L Co-57 0 N/A False Pos Test A MAPEP 2nd/2016 6i2/2016 16-MaW34 Water Bq/L Co-60 12.2 11.8 8.3-15.3 A MAPEP 2nd/2016 6/2/2016 16-MaW34 Water Bq/L H-3 0.878 N/A False Pos Test A MAPEP 2nd/2016 6/2/2016 16-MaW34 Water Bq/L Fe-55 18.3 16.2 11.3-21.1 A MAPEP 2nd/2016 6/2/2016 16-MaW34 Water Bq/L Mn-54 11.4 11.1 7.8-14.4 A MAPEP 2nd/2016 6/2/2016 16-MaW34 Water Bq/L Ni-63 12 12.3 8.6-16 A MAPEP 2nd/2016 6/2/2016 16-MaW34 Water Bq/L Pu-238 1.14 1.244 0.871-1.617 A MAPEP 2nd/2016 6/2/2016 16-MaW34 Water Bq/L Pu- 239/240 0.586 0.641 0.449-0.833 A MAPEP 2nd/2016 6/2/2016 16-MaW34 Water Bq/L K-40 272 251 176-326 A MAPEP 2nd/2016 6/2/2016 16-MaW34 Water Bq/L Ra-226 1.45 0.718 0.503-0.933 N(1)

MAPEP 2nd/2016 6/2/2016 16-MaW34 Water Bq/L

• Sr-90 7.12 8.74 6.12-11.36 A MAPEP 2nd/2016 6/2/2016 16-MaW34 Water Bq/L Tc-99 0.0453 N/A False Pos Test A

- 106 -

Table D-5 (CONT.)

GEL 2016 DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY MIXED ANALYTE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION PROGRAM (MAPEP) RES ULTS

%1~r

* :' *Range/

Ac9~1ltaiice'~

,,:':C,,pT,\;:,'.,, diiaJieh, c;'.RepQtl ,,,;sample*. *.c.,-S11mple i. ! uriif<, , ~*:,AnaM~/ >0' . GEL~; -,;

cc;c;-s_,

, Evaluation'

', Pr'i>videf Year Date , l\iililib~r 'Media *

• Nuclide Ratio,. , ., -~

MAPEP 2nd/2016 6/2/2016 16-MaW34 Water Sq/L U-234/233 1.37 1.48 1.04-1.92 A MAPEP 2nd/2016 6/2/2016 16-MaW34 Water Sq/L U-238 1.43 1.53 1.07-1.99 A MAPEP 2nd/2016 6/2/2016 16-MaW34 Water Sq/L Zn-65 14.3 13.6 9.5-17.7 A MAPEP 2nd/2016 6/2/2016 16-MaW34 Water Sq/L Gr-A 0.957 0.67 0202-1.144 A MAPEP 2nd/2016 6/2/2016 16-MaW34 Water Sq/L Gr-S 2.39 2,15 1.08-3.23 A MAPEP 2nd/2016 6/2/2016 16-MaW34 Water Sq/L 1-129 4 3.85 2.70-5.01 A MAPEP 2nd/2016 6/2/2016 16-RdF34 Filter ug/sample U-235 0.091 0.101 0.071-0.131 A MAPEP 2nd/2016 6/2/2016 16-RdF34 Filter ug/sample U-238 13.9 13.8 9.7-17.9 A MAPEP 2nd/2016 6/2/2016 16-RdF34 Filter ug/sample U (Total) 14 13.9 9.7-18.1 A MAPEP 2nd/2016 6/2/2016 16-RdF34 Filter Sq/sample Am-241 0.0751 0.0805 0.0564-0.1047 A MAPEP 2nd/2016 6/2/2016 16-RdF34 Filter Sq/sample Cs-134 -0.0349 N/A False Pas Test A MAPEP 2nd/2016 6/2/2016 16-RdF34 Filter Sq/sample Cs-137 2.37 2.3 1.61-2.99 A MAPEP 2nd/2016 6/2/2016 16-RdF34 Filter Sq/sample Co-57 3 2.94 2.06-3.82 A MAPEP 2nd/2016 6/2/2016 16-RdF34 Filter Sq/sample Co-60 4.17 4.02 2.81-5.23 A MAPEP 2nd/2016 6/2/2016 16-RdF34 Filter Sq/sample Mn-54 4.6 4.53 3.17-5.89 A MAPEP 2nd/2016 6/2/2016 16-RdF34 Filter Sq/sample Pu- 238 0.0593 0.0637 0.0446-0.0828 A MAPEP 2nd/2016 6/2/2016 16-RdF34 Filter Sq/sample Pu- 239/240 0.0889 0.099 0.069-0.129 A MAPEP 2nd/2016 6/2/2016 16-RdF34 Filter Sq/sample Sr-90 1.01 1.38 0.97-1.79 A MAPEP 2nd/2016 6/2/2016 16-RdF34 Filter Sq/sample U-234/233 0.17 0.165 0.116-0.215 A MAPEP 2nd/2016 6/2/2016 16-RdF34 Filter Sq/sample U-238 0.179 0.172 0.12-0.224 A MAPEP 2nd/2016 6/2/2016 16-RdF34 Filter Sq/sample Zn-65 3.52 3.57 2.5-4.64 A MAPEP 2nd/2016 6/2/2016 16-Rv34 Vegetation Sq/sample Am-241 0.101 0.089 0.062-0.116 A MAPEP 2nd/2016 6/2/2016 16-Rv34 Vegetation Sq/sample Cs-134 9.49 10.62 7.43-13.81 A MAPEP 2nd/2016 6/2/2016 16-Rv34 Vegetation Sq/sample Cs-137 5,5 5.62 3.93-7.31 A MAPEP 2nd/2016 6/2/2016 16-Rv34 Vegetation Sq/sample Co-57 12 11.8 8.3-15.3 A MAPEP 2nd/2016 6/2/2016 16-Rv34 Vegetation Sq/sample Co-60 -0.0339 N/A False Pos Test A MAPEP 2nd/2016 6/2/2016 16-Rv34 Vegetation Sq/sample Mn-54 -0.0066 N/A False Pas Test A MAPEP 2nd/2016 6/2/2016 16-Rv34 Vegetation Sq/sample Pu- 238 0.0929 0.105 0.074-0.137 A MAPEP 2nd/2016 6/2/2016 16-Rv34 Vegetation Sq/sample Pu- 239/240 0.0801 0.092 0.064-0.12 A MAPEP 2nd/2016 6/2/2016 16-Rv34 Vegetation Sq/sample Sr-90 -0.0065 N/A False Pos Test A MAPEP 2nd/2016 6/2/2016 16-Rv34 Vegetation Sq/sample U-234/233 0.204 0.196 0.137-0.255 A MAPEP 2nd/2016 6/2/2016 16-Rv34 Vegetation Sq/sample U-238 0.225 0.204 0.143-0.265 A MAPEP 2nd/2016 6/2/2016 16-Rv34 Vegetation Sq/sample Zn-65 10.3 9,6 6.7-12.5 A

- 107 -

Table D-5 (CONT.)

GEL 2016 DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY MIXED ANALYTE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION PROGRAM (MAPEP) RES ULTS

';;~~e~~r/;~ ;:;>:R,~~rt. *.. *9; §~9\pl~. '?saiiip1e Known i :;;. *Acceptance *.

',,.\,

Number* * *Meaia :!.1u'~ itp:. ** tta~rJer;'f tJ~( (;~~*;}* . . value :*** *... Ra,nge/ Ra~o C::{'.;.PT.~; 1

• .Provider** Evaluatio'i{'"

• *Date .**** *.*.>;.; .:.*:

MAPEP 4th/2016 12/2/2016 16-MaS35 Soil Bq/Kg Am-241 -0.563 N/A False Pos Test A MAPEP 4th/2016 12/2/2016 16-MaS35 Soil Bq/Kg Cs-134 3.74 N/A False Pos Test A MAPEP 4th/2016 12/2/2016 16-MaS35 Soil Bq/Kg Cs-137 1,180 1,067 747-1,387 A MAPEP 4th/2016 12/2/2016 16-MaS35 Soil Bq/Kg Co-57 1,220 1,190 833-1,547 A MAPEP 4th/2016 12/2/2016 16-MaS35 Soil Bq/Kg Co-60 889 851 596-1,106 A MAPEP 4th/2016 12/2/2016 16-MaS35 Soil Bq/Kg Fe-55 -337 N/A False Pos Test A MAPEP 4th/2016 12/2/2016 16-MaS35 Soil Bq/Kg Mn-54 2.5 N/A False Pos Test A MAPEP 4th/2016 12/2/2016 16-MaS35 Soil Bq/Kg Ni-63 1,090 990 693-1,287 A MAPEP 4th/2016 12/2/2016 16-MaS35 Soil Bq/Kg Pu- 238 69 70.4 49.3-91.5 A MAPEP 4th/2016 12/2/2016 16-MaS35 Soil Bq/Kg Pu- 239/240 46.8 53.8 37.7-69.9 A MAPEP 4th/2016 12/2/2016 16-MaS35 Soil Bq/Kg K-40 619 588 412-764 A MAPEP 4th/2016 12/2/2016 16-MaS35 Soil Bq/Kg Sr-90 770 894 626-1, 162 A MAPEP 4th/2016 12/2/2016 16-MaS35 Soil Bq/Kg Tc-99 548 556 389-723 A MAPEP 4th/2016 12/2/2016 16-MaS35 Soil Bq/Kg U-234/233 122 122 85-159 A MAPEP 4th/2016 12/2/2016 16-MaS35 Soil Bq/Kg U-238 122 121 85-157 A MAPEP 4th/2016 12/2/2016 16-MaS35 Soil Bq/Kg Zn-65 775 695 487-904 A*

MAPEP 4th/2016 12/2/2016 16-MaW35 Water Bq/L Am-241 0.725 0.814 0.570-1.058 A MAPEP 4th/2016 12/2/2016 16-MaW35 Water Bq/L Cs-134 22.2 23.9 16.7-31.1 A MAPEP 4th/2016 12/2/2016 16-MaW35 Water Bq/L Cs-137 -0.089 N/A False Pos Test A MAPEP 4th/2016 12/2/2016 16-MaW35 Water Bq/L Co-57 27.6 27.3 19.1-35.5 A MAPEP 4th/2016 12/2/2016 16-MaW35 Water Bq/L Co-60 -0.001 N/A False Pos Test A MAPEP 4th/2016 12/2/2016 16-MaW35 Water Bq/L H-3 337 334 151-281 A MAPEP 4th/2016 12/2/2016 16-MaW35 Water Bq/L Fe-55 22.3 21.5 15.1-28.0 A MAPEP 4th/2016 12/2/2016 16-MaW35 Water Bq/L Mn-54 14.7 14.8 10.4-19.2 A MAPEP 4th/2016 12/2/2016 16-MaW35 Water Bq/L Ni-63 17 17.2 12.0-22.4 A MAPEP 4th/2016 12/2/2016 16-MaW35 Water Bq/L Pu- 238 1.09 1.13 0.79-1.47 A MAPEP 4th/2016 12/2/2016 16-MaW35 Water Bq/L Pu- 239/240 0.024 0.013 Sens. Eval A MAPEP 4th/2016 12/2/2016 16-MaW35 Water Bq/L K-40 275 252 176-328 A MAPEP 4th/2016 12/2/2016 16-MaW35 Water Bq/L Ra-226 1.02 1.33 0.93-1.73 A MAPEP 4th/2016 12/2/2016 16-MaW35 Water Bq/L Sr-90 -0.0029 N/A False Pos Test A MAPEP 4th/2016 12/2/2016 16-MaW35 Water Bq/L Tc-99 10.9 11.6 8.1-15.1 A MAPEP 4th/2016 12/2/2016 16-MaW35 Water Bq/L U-234/233 1.85 1.86 1.30-2.42 A MAPEP 4th/2016 12/2/2016 16-MaW35 Water Bq/L U-238 1.89 1.92 1.34-2.50 A

- 108 -

Table D-5 (CONT.)

GEL 2016 DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY MIXED ANALYTE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION PROGRAM (MAPEP) RESULTS

11p:r *"'* .'Qulirtei'J Report Sample safup1e * ,Known' . A6i:el>tarice 0::,

• Eval*.u.. a. u*o*n'.,

Provider '(ear ** l'.l<!!E)

• Number *. M.edia *

• value'*. Range/Ratio. * * ...

MAPEP 4thl2016 121212016 16-MaW35 Water Bq/L Zn-65 17.5 17.4 12.2-22.6 A MAPEP 4thl2016 121212016 16-MaW35 Alk. Water Bqll 1-129 0.425 0.429 0.129-0.729 A MAPEP 4thl2016 121212016 16-RdF35 Filter uglsample U-235 0.0915 0.0903 0.0632-0.1174 A MAPEP 4thl2016 121212016 16-RdF35 Filter ug/sample U-238 13 12.5 8.8-16.3 A MAPEP 4thl2016 121212016 16-RdF35 Filter ug/sample U (Total) 13.6 12.6 8.8-16.4 A MA PEP 4thl2016 121212016 16-RdF35 Filter ug/sample Am-241 0.0000675 N/A False Pas Test A MAPEP 4thl2016 121212016 16-RdF35 Filter Bqlsample Cs-134 1.75 2.04 1.43-2.65 A MAPEP 4thl2016 121212016 16-RdF35 Filter Bqlsample Cs-137 1.89 1.78 1.25-2.31 A MAPEP 4thl2016 121212016 16-RdF35 Filter Bqlsample Co-57 2.48 2.48 1.74-3.22 A MAPEP 4thl2016 121212016 16-RdF35 Filter Bqlsample Co-60 3.3 3.26 2.28-4.24 A MAPEP 4thl2016 121212016 16-RdF35 Filter Bqlsample Mn-54 2.87 2.75 1.93-3.58 A MAPEP 4thl2016 121212016 16-RdF35 Filter Bqlsample Pu- 238 0.0694 0.0693 0.0485-0.0901 A MAPEP 4thl2016 121212016 16-RdF35 Filter Bq/sample Pu- 0.0508 0.0535 0.0375-0.0696 A 2391240 MAPEP 4thl2016 121212016 16-RdF35 Filter Bqlsample Sr-90 0.726 1.03 0.72-1.34 A MAPEP 4thl2016 121212016 16-RdF35 Filter Bqlsample U-2341233 0.15 0.15 0.105-0.195 A MAPEP 4thl2016 121212016 16-RdF35 Filter Bqlsample U-238 0.152 0.156 0.109-0.203 A MAPEP 4thl2016 121212016 16-RdF35 Filter Bq/sample Zn-65 0.0232 NIA False Pas Test A MAPEP 4thl2016 121212016 16-RdV35 Vegetation Bqlsample Am-241 0.052 0.062 0.076-0.140 A MAPEP 4thl2016 1212/2016 16-RdV35 Vegetation Bq_lsample Cs-134 0.0307 NIA False Pas Test A MAPEP 4thl2016 121212016 16-RdV35 Vegetation Bqlsample Cs-137 5.81 5.51 3.88-7.20 A MAPEP 4thl2016 121212016 16-RdV35 Vegetation Bqlsample Co-57 6.92 6.81 4.77-8.85 A MAPEP 4thl2016 121212016 16-RdV35 Vegetation Bqlsample Co-60 4.95 4.86 3.40-6.32 A MAPEP 4thl2016 121212016 16-RdV35 Vegetation Bqlsample Mn-54 7.8 7.27 5.09-9.45 A MAPEP 4thl2016 121212016 16-RdV35 Vegetation Bqlsample Pu- 238 0.0783 0.082 0.57-0.107 A MAPEP 4thl2016 121212016 16-RdV35 Vegetation Bqlsample Pu- 0.00151 NIA False Pas Test A 2391240 MAPEP 4thl2016 121212016 16-RdV35 Vegetation Bqlsample Sr-90 0.575 0.8 0.56-1.04 A MAPEP 4thl2016 121212016 16-RdV35 Vegetation Bqlsample U-2341233 0.114 0.117 0.082-0.152 A MAPEP 4thl2016 1212/2016 16-RdV35 Vegetation Bq/sample U-238 0.125 0.122 0.085-0.159 A MAPEP 4th/2016 12/2/2016 16-RdV35 Vegetation Bq/sample Zn-65 5.87 5.4 3.78-7.02 A A= Acceptable N =Not Acceptable

{1) CAP: CARR 160602

- 109 -

Table D-5 (CONT.)

GEL 2016 DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY MIXED ANALYTE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION PROGRAM (MAPEP) RESULTS Notes:

False Pos Test - The MAPEP program uses false positive testing to identify laboratory results that indicate the presence of a particular radionuclide in a MAPEP sample when, in fact, the actual activity of the radionuclide is far below the detection limit of the measurement. Not Acceptable ("N") performance, and hence a false positive result, is indicated when the range encompassing the result, plus or minus the total uncertainty at three standard deviations, does not include zero (e.g., 2.5 +/- 0.2; range of 1.9 to 3.1 ).

Statistically, the probability that a result can exceed the absolute value of its total uncertainty at three standard deviations by chance alone is less than 1%. MAPEP uses a three standard deviation criterion for the false positive test to ensure confidence about issuing a false positive performance evaluation. A result that is greater than three times the total uncertainty of the measurement represents a statistically positive detection with over 99% confidence.

Sens. Eval - Sensitivity evaluations are routinely performed to complement the false positive tests. In a sensitivity evaluation, the analyte is present at or near the detection limit, and the difference between the reported result and the MAPEP reference value is compared to the propagated combined total uncertainties. The results are evaluated at three standard deviations. If the observed difference is greater than three times the combined total uncertainty, the sensitivity evaluation is "Not Acceptable". The probability that such a difference can occur by chance alone is less than 1%. If the participant did not report a statistically positive result, a "Not-Detected" is noted in the text field of the MAPEP performance report. A non-detect is potentially a false negative result, dependent upon the laboratory's detection limit for the radionuclide.

- 110 -

Table D-6 GEL 2016 ERA PROGRAM (RAD) PERFORMANCE EVALUATION RESULTS PT Quarter':1

• Report Sample SainptEi' ArialyteJ *. GEL **Known ***Acceptance* 1*"*>>:**:"./ .

Unit Eval.u11tion

• Provider Year. *Date Number . Media* *Nuclide value **value Range/Ratio .o** ..

ERA 1st/2016 2/25/2016 RAD-104 Water pCi/L Ba-133 94.1 90.5 76.2-99.6 A ERA 1st/2016 2/25/2016 RAD-104 Water pCi/L Cs-134 24 23.2 17.7-25.9 A ERA 1st/2016 2125/2016 RAD-104 Water pCi/L Cs-137 72.6 59.1 53.2-67.8 N (1)

ERA 1st/2016 2/25/2016 RAD-104 Water pCi/L Co-60 85.3 83.4 75.1-94.1 A ERA 1st/2016 2/25/2016 RAD-104 Water pCi/L Zn-65 118 102 91.8-122 A ERA 1st/2016 2/25/2016 RAD-104 Water pCi/L Gr-A 91.1 72.8 38.3-89.7 N (1)

ERA 1st/2016 2/25/2016 RAD-104 Water pCi/L Gr-A 92.1 72.8 38.3-89.7 N (1)

ERA 1st/2016 2/25/2016 RAD-104 Water pCi/L Gr-B 20 17.8 10.2-26 A ERA 1st/2016 2/25/2016 RAD-104 Water pCi/L Ra-226 11 10 7.49-11.7 A ERA 1st/2016 2/25/2016 RAD-104 Water pCi/L Ra-226 11.6 10 7.49-11.7 A ERA 1st/2016 2/25/2016 RAD-104 Water pCi/L Ra-226 10.7 10 7.49-11.7 A ERA 1st/2016 2/25/2016 RAD-104 Water pCi/L Ra-228 1.99 2.21 1.02-3.52 A ERA 1st/2016 2/25/2016 RAD-104 Water pCi/L Ra-228 2.2 2.21 1.02-3.52 A ERA 1st/2016 2/25/2016 RAD-104 Water pCi/L Ra-228 1.99 2.21 1.02-3.52 A ERA 1st/2016 2/25/2016 RAD-104 Water pCi/L U (Nat) 66.9 67.1 54.6-74.4 A ERA 1st/2016 2/25/2016 RAD-104 Water pCi/L U (Nat) 65.5 67.1 54.6-74.4 A ERA 1st/2016 2/25/2016 RAD-104 Water µg/L U (Nat) 99.9 97.9 79.7-109 A 10,500-ERA 1st/2016 2/25/2016 RAD-104 Water pCi/L H-3 11,700 12,100 A 13,300 ERA 1st/2016 2/25/2016 RAD-104 Water pCi/L Sr-89 55.8 68 55.4-76.2 A ERA 1st/2016 2/25/2016 RAD-104 Water pCi/L Sr-90 44.7 43.4 32-49.8 A ERA 1st/2016 2/25/2016 RAD-104 Water pCi/L 1-131 24.6 25.1 20.8-29.7 A ERA 1st/2016 2/25/2016 RAD-104 Water pCi/L 1-131 24.2 25.1 20.8-29.7 A ERA 1st/2016 3/14/2016 QR030716U Water pCi/L Cs-137 156 157 141-175 A(2)

ERA 3rd/2016 8/30/2016 RAD-106 Water pCi/L Ba-133 86.2 82.9 69.7-91.2 A ERA 3rd/2016 8/30/2016 RAD-106 Water pCi/L Cs-134 62.3 65.3 53.1-71.8 A ERA 3rd/2016 8/30/2016 RAD-106 Water pCi/L Cs-137 99.3 95.2 85.7-107 A ERA 3rd/2016 8/30/2016 RAD-106 Water pCi/L Co-60 123 117 105-131 A ERA 3rd/2016 8/30/2016 RAD-106 Water pCi/L Zn-65 118 113 102-134 A ERA 3rd/2016 8/30/2016 RAD-106 Water pCi/L Gr-A 42.5 48.1 25-60.5 A ERA 3rd/2016 8/30/2016 RAD-106 Water pCi/L Gr-A 48.7 48.1 25-60.5 A ERA 3rd/2016 8/30/2016 RAD-106 Water pCi/L Gr-B 27.3 28.6 18.2-36.4 A ERA 3rd/2016 8/30/2016 RAD-106 Water pCi/L Ra-226 10.4 12.3 9.18-14.2 A ERA 3rd/2016 8/30/2016 RAD-106 Water pCi/L Ra-226 10 12.3 9.18-14.2 A ERA 3rd/2016 8/30/2016 RAD-106 Water pCi/L Ra-226 11.3 12.3 9.18-14.2 A

- 111 -

Table D-6 (CONT.)

GEL 2016 ERA PROGRAM (RAD) PERFORMANCE EVALUATION RESULTS

• 1**pt*W Quarter/

• Report samilia*** Sample " **'.Analyte/ K1ftiwi'i ,, '.~*!\~c~pfunce ;*:

Provider, Y~ar ... s i Date.* . Nu111ber . Media Unit

.. !'* Nuclid~: ,;*; <;*r'9e';.;;*. ~y~i~e* .Rangel Ratio Evall.Jation,;

,, ",')

ERA 3rd/2016 8/30/2016 RAD-106 Water pCi/L Ra-228 5.89 5.75 3.51-7.57 A ERA 3rd/2016 8/30/2016 RAD-106 Water pCi/L Ra-228 5.53 5.75 3.51-7.57 A ERA 3rd/2016 8/30/2016 RAD-106 Water pCi/L U (Nat) 36.4 35.2 28.4-39.3 A ERA 3rd/2016 8/30/2016 RAD-106 Water pCi/L U (Nat) 34.2 35.2 28.4-39.3 A ERA 3rd/2016 8/30/2016 RAD-106 Water µg/L U (Nat) 51.1 51.3 41.4-57.3 A ERA 3rd/2016 8/30/2016 RAD-106 Water µg/L U (Nat) 55.6 51.3 41.4-57.3 A 10,800-ERA 3rd/2016 8/30/2016 RAD-106 Water pCi/L H-3 11,600 12,400 A 13,600 ERA 3rd/2016 8/30/2016 RAD-106 Water pCi/L Sr-89 56.9 53.3 42.3-60.9 A ERA 3rd/2016 8/30/2016 RAD-106 Water pCi/L Sr-89 62.8 53.3 42.3-60.9 N (3)

ERA 3rd/2016 8/30/2016 RAD-106 Water pCi/L Sr-90 39.1 39.2 28.8-45.1 A ERA 3rd/2016 8/30/2016 RAD-106 Water pCi/L Sr-90 35.1 39.2 28.8-45.1 A ERA 3rd/2016 8/30/2016 RAD-106 Water pCi/L 1-131 27.3 24.9 20.7-29.5 A ERA 3rd/2016 8/30/2016 RAD-106 Water pCi/L 1-131 25.2 24.9 20.7-29.5 A A= Acceptable N =Not Acceptable (1) CAP: CARR 160229-1005 (2) Retest for (1)

(3) CAP: CARR 160830-1025

- 112 -

Table D-7 GEL 2016 ERA PROGRAM (MRAD) PERFORMANCE EVALUATION RESULTS l*:A PT;:**;

auarter/ **Report *sariii)1e Sample* "' Unit

• ** **. Arialyte/ GEL . Known . Accep1ancE). Eval~ation ProvideF . .. Year ....Pate ** NumJ?,er llJledi<i .. .;*; Nuclidec)' \(alue . ;;~;..)ialue * ~angef Ratio.*

ERA 2nd/2016 5/13/2016 MRAD-24 Soil pCi/kg Ac-228 1,320 1,240 795-1,720 A ERA 2nd/2016 5/13/2016 MRAD-24 Soil pCi/kg Am-241 1,410 1,360 796-1,770 A ERA 2nd/2016 5/13/2016 MRAD-24 Soil pCi/kg Bi-212 1,220 1,240 330-1,820 A ERA 2nd/2016 5/13/2016 MRAD-24 Soil pCi/kg Bi-214 4,130 3,530 2, 130-5,080 A ERA 2nd/2016 5/13/2016 MRAD-24 Soil pCi/kg Cs-134 3,500 3,450 2,260-4, 140 A ERA 2nd/2016 5/13/2016 MRAD-24 Soil pCi/kg Cs-137 4,510 4,310 3,300-5,550 A ERA 2nd/2016 5/13/2016 MRAD-24 Soil pCi/kg Co-60 5,760 5,490 3,710-7,560 A ERA 2nd/2016 5/13/2016 MRAD-24 Soil pCi/kg Fe-212 1,360 1,240 812-1,730 A ERA 2nd/2016 5/13/2016 MRAD-24 Soil pCi/kg Fe-214 4,590 3,710 2, 170-5,530 A ERA 2nd/2016 5/13/2016 MRAD-24 Soil pCi/kg Mn-54 <54.7 <1,000 <1,000 A ERA 2nd/2016 5/13/2016 MRAD-24 Soil pCi/kg Pu-238 585 658 396-908 A ERA 2nd/2016 5/13/2016 MRAD-24 Soil pCi/kg Pu-239 477 496 324-685 A ERA 2nd/2016 5/13/2016 MRAD-24 Soil pCi/kg K-40 10,900 10,600 7,740-14,200 A ERA 2nd/2016 5/13/2016 MRAD-24 Soil pCi/kg Sr-90 7,120 8,560 3,260-13,500 A ERA 2nd/2016 5/13/2016 MRAD-24 Soil pCi/kg Th-234 3,590 3,430 1,080-6,450 A ERA 2nd/2016 5/13/2016 MRAD-24 Soil pCi/kg U-234 3,940 3,460 2, 110-4,430 A ERA 2nd/2016 5/13/2016 MRAD-24 Soil pCi/kg U-234 2,334 3,460 2, 110-4,430 A ERA 2nd/2016 5/13/2016 MRAD-24 Soil pCi/kg U-234 3,460 3,460 2, 110-4,430 A ERA 2nd/2016 5/13/2016 MRAD-24 Soil pCi/kg U-238 3,540 3,430 2, 110-4,430 A ERA 2nd/2016 5/13/2016 MRAD-24 Soil pCi/kg U-238 2,757 3,430 2, 110-4,430 A ERA 2nd/2016 5/13/2016 MRAD-24 Soil pCi/kg U-238 3,340 3,430 2, 110-4,430 A ERA 2nd/2016 5/13/2016 MRAD-24 Soil pCi/kg U-Total 7,428 7,050 3,820-9,300 A ERA 2nd/2016 5/13/2016 MRAD-24 Soil pCi/kg U-Total 5,091 7,050 3,820-9,300 A ERA 2nd/2016 5/13/2016 MRAD-24 Soil pCi/kg U-Total 7,214 7,050 3,820-9,300 A ERA 2nd/2016 5/13/2016 MRAD-24 Soil µg/kg U-Total 10,600 10,300 5,680-13,000 A ERA 2nd/2016 5/13/2016 MRAD-24 Soil µg/kg U-Total 9,790 10,300 5,680-13,000 A ERA 2nd/2016 5/13/2016 MRAD-24 Soil µg/kg U-Total 8,450 10,300 5,680-13,000 A ERA 2nd/2016 5/13/2016 MRAD-24 Soil µg/kg U-Total 9,370 10,300 5,680-13,000 A ERA 2nd/2016 5/13/2016 MRAD-24 Soil µg/kg U-Total 9,790 10,300 5,680-13,000 A ERA 2nd/2016 5/13/2016 MRAD-24 Soil pCi/kg Zn-65 2,730 2,450 1,950-3,260 A ERA 2nd/2016 5/13/2016 MRAD-24 Vegetation pCi/kg Am-241 2,240 2,120 1,300-2,820 A ERA 2nd/2016 5/13/2016 MRAD-24 Vegetation pCi/kg Cs-134 1,070 1,070 687-1,390 A ERA 2nd/2016 5/13/2016 MRAD-24 Vegetation pCi/kg Cs-137 941 838 608-1,170 A ERA 2nd/2016 5/13/2016 MRAD-24 Vegetation pCi/kg Co-60 1,300 1,100 759-1,540 A

- 113 -

Table D-7 (CONT.)

GEL 2016 ERA PROGRAM (MRAD) PERFORMANCE EVALUATION RESULTS

• .... *PT**"" c:lliarteri samj)1'e *Sarni>!~ x** .Ur\if

.,.:;: Ari'a1yt~f . GEL* ""'K:Cio;.;;~:*: "'Acceptilnce .

• • Provider *Year

• NL1n:i~er*. *c :M,ed!.a. * .*. . Nuclide

• N~lue

• value Range/Ra.tio .

ERA 2nd/2016 5/13/2016 MRAD-24 Vegetation pCi/kg Pu-238 2,620 2,810 1,680-3,850 A ERA 2nd/2016 5/13/2016 MRAD-24 Vegetation pCi/kg Cm-244 1,310 1,560 764-2,430 A ERA 2nd/2016 5/13/2016 MRAD-24 Vegetation pCi/kg Mn-54 <34.1 <300 <300 A ERA 2nd/2016 5/13/2016 MRAD-24 Vegetation pCi/kg Pu-239 3,360 3,640 2,230-5,010 A 22,400-ERA 2nd/2016 5/13/2016 MRAD-24 Vegetation pCi/kg K-40 38, 100 31,000 A 43,500 ERA 2nd/2016 5/13/2016 MRAD-24 Vegetation pCi/kg Sr-90 8,370 8,710 4,960-11,500 A ERA 2nd/2016 5/13/2016 MRAD-24 Vegetation pCi/kg U-234 4,320 4,160 2,740-5,340 A ERA 2nd/2016 5/13/2016 MRAD-24 Vegetation pCi/kg U-238 4,430 4,120 2,750-5,230 A ERA 2nd/2016 5/13/2016 MRAD-24 Vegetation pCi/kg U-Total 9,040 8,470 5,740-10,500 A ERA 2nd/2016 5/13/2016 MRAD-24 Vegetation µg/kg U-Total 12,500 12,400 8,310-15,700 A ERA 2nd/2016 5/13/2016 MRAD-24 Vegetation µg/kg U-Total 13,300 12,400 8,310-15,700 A ERA 2nd/2016 5/13/2016 MRAD-24 Vegetation pCi/kg Zn-65 3,700 2,820 2,030-3,960 A ERA 2nd/2016 5/13/2016 MRAD-24 Filter pCi/Filter Am-241 44.2 45.9 28.3-62.1 A ERA 2nd/2016 5/13/2016 MRAD-24 Filter pCi/Filter Cs-134 254 304 193-377 A ERA 2nd/2016 5/13/2016 MRAD-24 Filter pCi/Filter Cs-137 1,060 1,50 864-1,510 A ERA 2nd/2016 5/13/2016 MRAD-24 Filter pCi/Filter Co-60 576 623 482-778 A ERA 2nd/2016 5/13/2016 MRAD-24 Filter pCi/Filter Fe-55 94.9 126 39.1-246 A ERA 2nd/2016 5/13/2016 MRAD-24 Filter pCi/Filter Mn-54 <3.61 <50.0 <50.0 A ERA 2nd/2016 5/13/2016 MRAD-24 Filter pCi/Filter Pu-238 60.8 70.5 48.3-92.7 A ERA 2nd/2016 5/13/2016 MRAD-24 Filter pCi/Filter Pu-239 46.9 54.8 39.7-71.6 A ERA 2nd/2016 5/13/2016 MRAD-24 Filter pCi/Filter Sr-90 141 150 73.3-225 A ERA 2nd/2016 5/13/2016 MRAD-24 Filter pCi/Filter U-234 63.1 64.8 40.2-97.7 A ERA 2nd/2016 5/13/2016 MRAD-24 Filter pCi/Filter U-234 54.2 64.8 40.2-97.7 A ERA 2nd/2016 5/13/2016 MRAD-24 Filter pCi/Filter U-238 51.4 64.2 41.5-88.8 A ERA 2nd/2016 5/13/2016 MRAD-24 Filter pCi/Filter U-238 56.9 64.2 41.5-88.8 A ERA 2nd/2016 5/13/2016 MRAD-24 Filter pCi/Filter U-Total 117 132 73.1-201 A ERA 2nd/2016 5/13/2016 MRAD-24 Filter pCi/Filter U-Total 114 132 73.1-201 A ERA 2nd/2016 5/13/2016 MRAD-24 Filter µg/Filter U-Total 156 192 123-270 A ERA 2nd/2016 5/13/2016 MRAD-24 Filter µg/Filter U-Total 171 192 123-270 A ERA 2nd/2016 5/13/2016 MRAD-24 Filter µg/Filter U-Total 154 192 123-270 A ERA 2nd/2016 5/13/2016 MRAD-24 Filter µg/Filter U-Total 156 192 123-270 A ERA 2nd/2016 5/13/2016 MRAD-24 Filter pCi/Filter Zn-65 358 356 255-492 A

- 114 -

Table D-7 (CONT.)

GEL 2016 ERA PROGRAM (MRAD) PERFORMANCE EVALUATION RESULTS f>l'l * ' Qi.iartlir:/'

• R'eii . afu~ie" :.*fsampie°'. < Analyt~i *GEL **.known ***

Unit Acceptance Evaluation Proyider, <,year**.*, * :oate 1 /Number '. Media

• Nuclide

' . ,., .>~' / ** 1;,va!ue. .value * .. Ra119~r~~ti!'.J : ,~<~/,

ERA 2nd/2016 5/13/2016 MRAD-24 Filter pCi/Filter Gr-A 79.5 70.1 23.5-109 A ERA 2nd/2016 5/13/2016 MRAD-24 Filter pCi/Filter Gr-B 63.5 54.4 34.4-79.3 A ERA 2nd/2016 5/13/2016 MRAD-24 Filter pCi/Filter Gr-B 63.5 54.4 34.4-79.3 A ERA 2nd/2016 5/13/2016 MRAD-24 Water pCi/L Am-241 134 121 81.5-162 A ERA 2nd/2016 5/13/2016 MRAD-24 Water pCi/L Cs-134 813 842 618-968 A ERA 2nd/2016 5/13/2016 MRAD-24 Water pCilL Cs-137 1,110 1.100 934-1,320 A ERA 2nd/2016 511312016 MRAD-24 Water pCi/L Co-60 1,090 1,050 912-1,230 A ERA 2nd/2016 511312016 MRAD-24 Water pCi/L Fe-55 1,630 1,650 984-2,240 A ERA 2nd/2016 5/13/2016 MRAD-24 Water pCi/L Mn-54 <6.38 <100 <100 A ERA 2nd/2016 5/1312016 MRAD-24 Water pCi/L Pu-238 126 138 102-172 A ERA 2ndl2016 511312016 MRAD-24 Water pCi/L Pu-239 88.2 98.7 76.6-124 A ERA 2nd/2016 5/13/2016 MRAD-24 Water pCi/L Sr-90 472 434 283-574 A ERA 2nd/2016 5/13/2016 MRAD-24 Water pCi/L U-234 59.3 52.7 39.6-68 A ERA 2nd/2016 5/13/2016 MRAD-24 Water pCi/L U-234 49.9 52.7 39.6-68 A ERA 2nd/2016 5/13/2016 MRAD-24 Water pCi/L U-234 49.8 52.7 39.6-68 A ERA 2nd/2016 5/13/2016 MRAD-24 Water pCi/L U-238 54.1 52.3 39.9-64.2 A ERA 2nd/2016 5/13/2016 MRAD-24 Water pCi/L U-238 53.7 52.3 39.9-64.2 A ERA 2nd/2016 5/13/2016 MRAD-24 Water pCi/L U-238 49.1 52.3 39.9-64.2 A ERA 2nd/2016 5/13/2016 MRAD-24 Water pCi/L Li-Total 110.7 107 78.6-138 A ERA 2ndl2016 5/1312016 MRAD-24 Water pCi/L Li-Total 158 107 78.6-138 N(1)

ERA 2nd/2016 5/13/2016 MRAD-24 Water pCi/L U-Total 106.4 107 78.6-138 A ERA 2nd/2016 5/13/2016 MRAD-24 Water pCi/L Li-Total 103.9 107 78.6-138 A ERA 2nd/2016 5/13/2016 MRAD-24 Water µg/L Li-Total 160.9 157 125-190 A ERA 2nd/2016 5/13/2016 MRAD-24 Water µg/L Li-Total 147 157 125-190 A ERA 2nd/2016 5/13/2016 MRAD-24 Water µg/L Li-Total 161 157 125-190 A ERA 2nd/2016 5/13/2016 MRAD-24 Water pCi/L Zn-65 1,130 1,010 842-1,270 A ERA 2nd/2016 5/13/2016 MRAD-24 Water pCi/L Gr-A 160 117 41.5-181 A ERA 2ndl2016 511312016 MRAD-24 Water pCilL Gr-B 79.3 75.5 43.2-112 A ERA 2nd/2016 511312016 MRAD-24 Water pCi/L H-3 8,470 8,650 5,800-12,300 A ERA 2nd/2016 512312016 RAD-105 Water pCi/L Cs-137 81.5 78.4 70.6-88.9 A ERA 2nd/2016 5/23/2016 RAD-105 Water pCi/L Gr-A 72.6 62.7 32.9-77.8 A ERA 2nd/2016 5/2312016 RAD-105 Water pCi/L Gr-A 74 62.7 32.9-77.8 A

- 115 -

Table D-7 (CONT.)

GEL 2016 ERA PROGRAM (MRAD) PERFORMANCE EVALUATION RESULTS PT Qu~~er(J. R~prirf  ;

• sa~fifo* *

• sample Known Provider* Year ' ' .. Date J>liunber Media value*

ERA 2nd/2016 5/23/2016 RAD-105 Water pCi/l 1-131 27.9 26.6 22.1-31.3 A ERA 4th/2016 11/23/2016 MRAD-25 Soil pCi/kg Ac-228 1,140 1,170 750-1,620 A ERA 4th/2016 11/23/2016 MRAD-25 Soil pCi/kg Am-241 1,040 878 514-1, 140 A ERA 4th/2016 11/23/2016 MRAD-25 Soil pCi/kg Bi-212 1,500 1,280 341-1,880 A ERA 4th/2016 11/23/2016 MRAD-25 Soil pCi/kg Bi-214 1,350 1,230 741-1,770 A ERA 4th/2016 11/23/2016 MRAD-25 Soil pCi/kg Cs-134 5,450 5,470 3,580-6,570 A ERA 4th/2016 11/23/2016 MRAD-25 Soil pCi/kg Cs-137 7,230 6,700 5, 130-8,620 A ERA 4th/2016 11/23/2016 MRAD-25 Soil pCi/kg Co-60 8,490 8,020 5420-11,000 A ERA 4th/2016 11/23/2016 MRAD-25 Soil pCi/kg Pb-212 1,230 1,200 786-1,670 A ERA 4th/2016 11/23/2016 MRAD-25 Soil pCi/kg Pb-214 1,460 1,280 747-1,910 A ERA 4th/2016 11/23/2016 MRAD-25 Soil pCi/kg Mn-54 <51.2 <1,000 <1,000 A ERA 4th/2016 11/23/2016 MRAD-25 Soil pCi/kg Pu-238 587 647 389-893 A ERA 4th/2016 11/23/2016 MRAD-25 Soil pCi/kg Pu-239 561 525 343-725 A ERA 4th/2016 11/23/2016 MRAD-25 Soil pCi/kg K-40 11,000 10,600 7,740-14,200 A ERA 4th/2016 11/23/2016 MRAD-25 Soil pCi/kg Sr-90 3,740 4,540 1, 730-7, 170 A ERA 4th/2016 11/23/2016 MRAD-25 Soil pCi/kg Th-234 2,120 1,750 553-3,290 A ERA 4th/2016 11/23/2016 MRAD-25 Soil pCi/kg U-234 1,650 1,760 1,080-2,260 A ERA 4th/2016 11/23/2016 MRAD-25 Soil pCi/kg U-234 1,230 1,760 1,080-2,260 A ERA 4th/2016 11/23/2016 MRAD-25 Soil pCi/kg U-234 2,220 1,760 1,080-2,260 A ERA 4th/2016 11/23/2016 MRAD-25 Soil pCi/kg U-238 1,630 1,750 1,080-2,260 A ERA 4th/2016 11/23/2016 MRAD-25 Soil pCi/kg U-238 1,290 1,750 1,080-2,260 A ERA 4th/2016 11/23/2016 MRAD-25 Soil pCi/kg U-238 1,550 1,750 1,080-2,260 A ERA 4th/2016 11/23/2016 MRAD-25 Soil pCi/kg U-Total 3,910 3,590 1,950-4,740 A ERA 4th/2016 11/23/2016 MRAD-25 Soil pCi/kg U-Total 3,310 3,590 1,950-4,740 A ERA 4th/2016 11/23/2016 MRAD-25 Soil pCi/kg U-Total 2,520 3,590 1,950-4,740 A ERA 4th/2016 11/23/2016 MRAD-25 Soil pCi/kg U-Total 3,930 3,590 1,950-4,740 A ERA 4th/2016 11/23/2016 MRAD-25 Soil µg/kg U-Total 4,890 5,240 2,890-6,590 A ERA 4th/2016 11/23/2016 MRAD-25 Soil µg/kg U-Total 5,840 5,240 2,890-6,590 A ERA 4th/2016 11/23/2016 MRAD-25 Soil µg/kg U-Total 3,780 5,240 2,890-6,590 A ERA 4th/2016 11/23/2016 MRAD-25 Soil µg/kg U-Total 4,670 5,240 2,890-6,590 A ERA 4th/2016 11/23/2016 MRAD-25 Soil pCi/kg Zn-65 3,310 2,920 2,330-3,880 A ERA 4th/2016 11/23/2016 MRAD-25 Vegetation pCi/kg Am-241 1,590 1,530 935-2,030 A

- 116 -

Table D-7 (CONT.)

GEL 2016 ERA PROGRAM (MRAD) PERFORMANCE EVALUATION RESULTS

,., , vt.>pf ' >:~ Quarter' Report .. sample * " *s~in~ie '

'.'{'~;

Unit

.Provider .Year * * [)<!i:~

• NulT\.ber; tc* Media ERA 4th/2016 11/23/2016 MRAD-25 Vegetation pCi/kg Cs-134 1,640 1,690 1.090-2,200 A ERA 4th/2016 11/23/2016 MRAD-25 Vegetation pCi/kg Cs-137 1,170 1,030 747-1,430 A ERA 4th/2016 11/23/2016 MRAD-25 Vegetation pCi/kg Co-60 1,680 1,560 1,080-2, 180 A ERA 4th/2016 11/23/2016 MRAD-25 Vegetation pCi/kg Cm-244 496 530 260-826 A ERA 4th/2016 11/23/2016 MRAD-25 Vegetation pCi/kg Mn-54 <29.6 <300 <300 A ERA 4th/2016 11/23/2016 MRAD-25 Vegetation pCi/kg Pu-238 1,440 1,330 793-1,820 A ERA 4th/2016 11/23/2016 MRAD-25 Vegetation pCi/kg Pu-239 1,230 1,100 675-1,510 A 22,300-ERA 4th/2016 11/23/2016 MRAD-25 Vegetation pCi/kg K-40 31,400 30,900 A 43,400 ERA 4th/2016 11/23/2016 MRAD-25 Vegetation pCi/kg Sr-90 4,290 4,670 2,660-6, 190 A ERA 4th/2016 11/23/2016 MRAD-25 Vegetation pCi/kg U-234 3,730 3,110 2,040-3,990 A ERA 4th/2016 11/23/2016 MRAD-25 Vegetation pCi/kg U-234 3,430 3,110 2,040-3,990 A ERA 4th/2016 11/23/2016 MRAD-25 Vegetation pCi/kg U-238 3,490 . 3,090 2,060-3,930 A ERA 4th/2016 11/23/2016 MRAD-25 Vegetation pCi/kg U-238 3,370 3,090 2,060-3,930 A ERA 4th/2016 11/23/2016 MRAD-25 Vegetation pCi/kg U-Total 7,248 6,340 4,300-7,890 A ERA 4th/2016 11/23/2016 MRAD-25 Vegetation pCi/kg U-Total 6,680 6,340 4,300-7,890 A ERA 4th/2016 11/23/2016 MRAD-25 Vegetation pCi/kg U-Total 7,190 6,340 4,300-7,890 A ERA 4th/2016 11/23/2016 MRAD-25 Vegetation µg/kg U-Total 9,980 9,250 6,200-11,700 A ERA 4th/2016 11/23/2016 MRAD-25 Vegetation µg/kg U-Total 10,500 9,250 6,200-11,700 A ERA 4th/2016 11/23/2016 MRAD-25 Vegetation µg/kg U-Total 10,100 9,250 6,200-11,700 A ERA 4th/2016 11/23/2016 MRAD-25 Vegetation pCi/kg Zn-65 2,090 1,690 1,220-2,370 A ERA 4th/2016 11/23/2016 MRAD-25 Filter pCi/Filter Am-241 44 42.3 26.1-57.2 A ERA 4th/2016 11/23/2016 MRAD-25 Filter pCi/Filter Cs-134 614 614 391-762 A ERA 4th/2016 11/23/2016 MRAD-25 Filter pCi/Filter Cs-137 1,280 1,170 879-1,540 A ERA 4th/2016 11/23/2016 MRAD-25 Filter pCi/Filter Co-60 950 900 696-1, 120 A ERA 4th/2016 11/23/2016 MRAD-25 Filter pCi/Filter Fe-55 232 248 76.9-485 A ERA 4th/2016 11/23/2016 MRAD-25 Filter pCi/Filter Mn-54 <4.55 <50.0 <50.0 A ERA 4th/2016 11/23/2016 MRAD-25 Filter pCi/Filter Pu-238 54.5 61.9 42.4-81.4 A ERA 4th/2016 11/23/2016 MRAD-25 Filter pCi/Filter Pu-239 54.8 59.7 43.2-78 A ERA 4th/2016 11/23/2016 MRAD-25 Filter pCi/Filter Sr-90 97.4 101 49.4-151 A ERA 4th/2016 11/23/2016 MRAD-25 Filter pCi/Filter U-234 30.3 29.2 18.1-44 A ERA 4th/2016 11/23/2016 MRAD-25 Filter pCi/Filter U-234 30.9 29.2 18.1-44 A ERA 4th/2016 11/23/2016 MRAD-25 Filter pCi/Filter U-238 27.9 28.9 18.7-40 A

- 117 -

r Table D-7 (CONT.)

GEL 2016 ERA PROGRAM (MRAD) PERFORMANCE EVALUATION RESULTS

<< 'A'<: ;-;:;_

r;,~~~Td~t,~.. , i ERA 4th/2016 11/23/2016 MRAD-25 Filter pCi/Filter 29.4 28.9 18.7-40 A ERA 4th/2016 11/23/2016 MRAD-25 Filter pCi/Filter U-Total 54.1 59.5 32.9-90.5 A ERA 4th/2016 11/23/2016 MRAD-25 Filter pCi/Filter U-Total 61.5 59.5 I 32.9-90.5 A ERA 4th/2016 11/23/2016 MRAD-25 Filter pCi/Filter U-Total 60 59.5 32.9-90.5 A ERA 4th/2016 11/23/2016 MRAD-25 Filter µg/Filter U-Total 83.7 86.7 55.5-122 A ERA 4th/2016 11/23/2016 MRAD-25 Filter µg/Filter U-Total 80.7 86.7 55.5-122 A ERA 4th/2016 11/23/2016 MRAD-25 Filter µg/Filter U-Total 88.3 86.7 55.5-122 A ERA 4th/2016 11/23/2016 MRAD-25 Filter µg/Filter U-Total 80.7 86.7 55.5-122 A ERA 4th/2016 11/23/2016 MRAD-25 Filter pCi/Filter Zn-65 1,330 1,150 824-1,590 A ERA 4th/2016 11/23/2016 MRAD-25 Filter pCi/Filter Gr-A 79.6 71.2 23.9-111 A ERA 4th/2016 11/23/2016 MRAD-25 Filter pCi/Filter Gr-B 71.7 60.3 38.1-87.9 A ERA 4th/2016 11/23/2016 MRAD-25 Water pCi/L Am-241 58.6 56.2 37.9-75.4 A ERA 4th/2016 11/23/2016 MRAD-25 Water pCi/L Cs-134 1,190 1,260 925-1,450 A ERA 4th/2016 11/23/2016 MRAD-25 Water pCi/L Cs-137 1,030 987 838-1, 180 A ERA 4th/2016 11/23/2016 MRAD-25 Water pCi/L Co-60 1,990 1,960 1, 700-2,290 A ERA 4th/2016 11/23/2016 MRAD-25 Water pCi/L Fe-55 228 245 146-332 A ERA 4th/2016 11/23/2016 MRAD-25 Water pCi/L Mn-54 <5.09 <100 <100 A ERA 4th/2016 11/23/2016 MRAD-25 Water pCi/L Pu-238 85.6 112 82.9-139 A ERA 4th/2016 11/23/2016 MRAD-25 Water pCi/L Pu-239 125 157 122-198 A ERA 4th/2016 11/23/2016 MRAD-25 Water pCi/L Sr-90 658 751 489-993 A ERA 4th/2016 11/23/2016 MRAD-25 Water pCi/L U-234 106 105 78.9-135 A ERA 4th/2016 11/23/2016 MRAD-25 Water pCi/L U-234 108 105 78.9-135 A ERA 4th/2016 11/23/2016 MRAD-25 Water pCi/L U-234 103 105 78.9-135 A ERA 4th/2016 11/23/2016 MRAD-25 Water pCi/L U-238 98.4 104 79.3-128 A ERA 4th/2016 11/23/2016 MRAD-25 Water pCi/L U-Total 209 213 157-275 A ERA 4th/2016 11/23/2016 MRAD-25 Water pCi/L U-Total 225 213 157-275 A ERA 4th/2016 11/23/2016 MRAD-25 Water pCi/L U-Total 214 213 157-275 A ERA 4th/2016 11/23/2016 MRAD-25 Water pCi/L U-Total 211 213 157-275 A ERA 4th/2016 11/23/2016 MRAD-25 Water µg/L U-Total 295 311 248-376 A ERA 4th/2016 11/23/2016 MRAD-25 Water µg/L U-Total 317 311 248-376 A ERA 4th/2016 11/23/2016 MRAD-25 Water µg/L U-Total 336 311 248-376 A ERA 4th/2016 11/23/2016 MRAD-25 Water µg/L U-Total 312 311 248-376 A

- 118 -

1-Table D-7 (CONT.)

GEL 2016 ERA PROGRAM (MRAD) PERFORMANCE EVALUATION RESULTS

i'f>t *:*;; <otiil'rter / * . Repl!rt ,>.* :1'"sarli!>1e*****.* :s~:ch~!r. <<*,;,**

' *J Anlil~~*, *\> .* dE.L **1<110;,..n Ac~eptaiice . /' ,<<::'

. Unit  : J~ange(~atio

• • EvalUation :

• Provider Year .. pate

• Number* .*1*.

• Nucli<:Je *** *.. value value ,. :~~\..;;,

ERA 4th/2016 11/23/2016 MRAD-25 Water pCi/L Zn-65 807 724 604-913 A ERA 4th/2016 11/23/2016 MRAD-25 Water pCi/L Gr-A 207 165 58.6-256 A ERA 4th/2016 11/23/2016 MRAD-25 Water pCi/L Gr-B 119 130 74.4-193 A ERA 4th/2016 11/23/2016 MRAD-25 Water pCi/L H-3 9210 10,100 6, 770-14,400 A A= Acceptable N =Not Acceptable (1) CAP: CARR 160519-1015

- 119 -