ML071520436: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
| number = ML071520436
| number = ML071520436
| issue date = 05/23/2007
| issue date = 05/23/2007
| title = 05/23/2007 Feedback Forms, List of Attendees, & Final Slides from the Oyster Creek 2007 Annual Assessment Meeting (Aam)
| title = Feedback Forms, List of Attendees, & Final Slides from the Oyster Creek 2007 Annual Assessment Meeting (Aam)
| author name = Laird J, Tauro J
| author name = Laird J, Tauro J
| author affiliation = Exelon Corp, Grammes
| author affiliation = Exelon Corp, Grammes
Line 15: Line 15:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMlSSlOl NRC PUBLIC MEETING FEEDBACK Category 1 Aeeting Meeting late: 05/23/2007  
{{#Wiki_filter:U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMlSSlOl Category NRC PUBLIC MEETING FEEDBACK 1
~- - Title: NRC Annual Assessment Meeting of Oyster Creek ~~ ~ __ - - - ~~ n order to better serve the public, we need to hear from the meeting participants.
Aeeting                                             Meeting late:           05/23/2007
Please take a few minutes to fill out his feedback form and return it to NRC. 1. 2. 3. 1. 1. 3. 7. How did you hear about this meetinq? E] NRC Web Page E] NRC Mailing List Radio/'TV Were you able to find supporting information prior to the meeting? Did the meeting achieve its stated purpose? Has this meeting helped you with your understanding of the topic?
 
Were the meeting starting time, duration, and location reasonably convenient?
==Title:==
Were you given sufficient opportunity to ask questions or express your views? Are you satisfied overall with the NRC staff who participated in the meeting? E Newspaper - No Somewhat - Yes JPlease explain below) 0 0 0 0 0 cl 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ;OMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS: Thank you for answering these questions.
NRC Annual Assessment Meeting of Oyster Creek
5 Lr-L ha@- h / -- - 5 P- Continue Comments on the reverse. 4 relephone No. 7 3s ~ -$$?s - E-Mail 3 av )MB NO 3150-0197  
__                                           - - -                                   ~~                        ~~            ~       ~-            -
'ublic Protection Notdication II a means used to ide an information colleclion does not dlsplay a currently valid OMB control number, the NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person le lot required to respond to. the inlormation collection Please fold on the dotted lines with Business Reply side out, tape the bottom, and mail back to the NRC. 0 Check here if you would like a member of NRC staff to contact you. Expires: 06/30/2009 NRC PUBLIC MEETING FEEDBACK US. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Aeeting Meeting late: 05/23/2007 Title: NRC Annual Assessment Meeting of Oyster Creek ~ - ___~ _~__ __ __ ~~~~~~~ ~~~ ~- - - n order to better serve the public, we need to hear from the meeting participants. Please take a few minutes to fill out his feedback form and return it to NRC. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. How did you hear about this meetinq? NRCWebPage 111 NRC Mailing List 7 Newspaper
n order to better serve the public, we need to hear from the meeting participants. Please take a few minutes to fill out his feedback form and return it to NRC.
~~~ a RadronV Were you able to find supporting information prior to the meeting? Did the meeting achieve its stated purpose? Has this meeting helped you with your understanding of the topic?
: 1.       How did you hear about this meetinq?
Were the meeting starting time, dudon, and location reasonably convenient?
E]NRC Web Page                                         E] NRC Mailing List                                   E Newspaper Radio/'TV No            Somewhat Yes                  JPlease explain below)
Were you given sufficient opportunity to ask questions or express your views? Are you satisfied overall with the NRC staff who participated in the meeting? - No Somewhat Yes Please exdain below) 0 0 U 0 ZOMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS:
: 2.        Were you able to find supporting information prior to the meeting?
Thank you for answering these questions.
0                  0                  0
Continue Comments on the reverse.
: 3.        Did the meeting achieve its stated purpose?                                                                                       0                  0
Q Check here if you would like a member of NRC staff to contact you relephone
: 1.        Has this meeting helped you with your understanding of the topic?
~o.6 10 76<@>2 *-Mail Expires 06/30/2009 ~ ~~ .- )ME NO 3150-0197
cl                  0                  0
'uMic Protection Noliftcallon If a means used lo impose an information collection does not display a currently valid OMB control number. the NRC may not conduct or sponsor. and a person IS 101 required to respond lo. the information collection Please fold on the dotted lines with Business Reply side out, tape the bottom, and mail back to the NRC.
: 1.        Were the meeting starting time, duration, and location reasonably convenient?
May 23,2007 Nuclear Regulatory Commission Public Meeting 2006 Annual Assessment Meeting for Oyster Creek Name Title Affiliation Request to Speak 5 I May 23,2007 Nuclear Regulatory Commission Public Meeting 2006 Annual Assessment Meeting for Oyster Creek ~ Request to Speak Name Title Affiliation
0                  0
+TI-?-- - 7 May 23,2007 Nuclear Regulatory Commission Public Meeting 2006 Annual Assessment Meeting for Oyster Creek Name Title Affiliation Request to Speak May 23,2007 Nuclear Regulatory Commission Public Meeting 2006 Annual Assessment Meeting for Oyster Creek Name Title Af f i I iat ion Request I to Speak
: 3.        Were you given sufficient opportunity to ask questions or express your views?
* NRC Annual Performance Assessment of Oyster Creek 2006 Reactor Oversight Program Purpose of Today's Meeting NRC will address licensee performance as described in the annual assessment letter.
: 7.        Are you satisfied overall with the NRC staff who participated in the meeting?
0                   0                   0
;OMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS:                                                                                                 Thank you for answering these questions.
5 Lr-Lha@-                       h             /     --   -5         P -
Continue Comments on the reverse. 4 relephone No.         7 3s -$$?s     ~                  - E-Mail                                                               0 memberCheck here if you would like a of NRC staff to contact you.
)MB NO 3150-0197 3a              v                                                                                                          Expires: 06/30/2009
'ublic Protection Notdication II a means used to i d e an information colleclion does not dlsplay a currently valid OMB control number, the NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person le lot required to respond to. the inlormation collection Please fold on the dotted lines with Business Reply side out, tape the bottom, and mail back to the NRC.
 
US. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION NRC PUBLIC MEETING FEEDBACK Aeeting                                             Meeting late:           05/23/2007
 
==Title:==
NRC Annual Assessment Meeting of Oyster Creek
                  ~                         -                               -        _ _ _ ~_ ~ ___          _ __     ~~~~~~~                           ~~~         ~-           -
n order to better serve the public, we need to hear from the meeting participants. Please take a few minutes to fill out his feedback form and return it to NRC.
: 1.       How did you hear about this meetinq?
NRCWebPage                                     111 NRC Mailing List                                 7Newspaper a        RadronV
                                                                                                                                ~~~
No            Somewhat Yes                  Please exdain below)
: 2.        Were you able to find supporting information prior to the meeting?
0
: 3.        Did the meeting achieve its stated purpose?                                                                                                           0
: 4.        Has this meeting helped you with your understanding of the topic?
: 5.        Were the meeting starting time, d u d o n , and location reasonably convenient?
: 6.        Were you given sufficient opportunity to ask questions or express your views?
U                  0
: 7.        Are you satisfied overall with the NRC staff who participated in the meeting?
ZOMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS:                                                                                                 Thank you for answering these questions.
Continue Comments on the reverse. Q relephone ~ o . 610                76<@>2
                                      ~  ~~        .-
                                                              -Mail                                                                      Check here if you would like a member of NRC staff to contact you
)ME NO 3150-0197                                                                                                                                                    Expires 06/30/2009
'uMic Protection Noliftcallon If a means used lo impose an informationcollection does not display a currently valid OMB control number. the NRC may not conduct or sponsor. and a person IS 101 required to respond lo. the informationcollection Please fold on the dotted lines with Business Reply side out, tape the bottom, and mail back to the NRC.
 
May 23,2007 Nuclear Regulatory Commission Public Meeting 2006 Annual Assessment Meeting for Oyster Creek Name           Title     Affiliation   Request to Speak 5
I
 
May 23,2007 Nuclear Regulatory Commission Public Meeting 2006 Annual Assessment Meeting for Oyster Creek
                                                    ~
Name            Title      Affiliation  Request to Speak
--?-IT+  -
7
 
May 23,2007 Nuclear Regulatory Commission Public Meeting 2006 Annual Assessment Meeting for Oyster Creek Name           Title     Affiliation Request to Speak
 
May 23,2007 Nuclear Regulatory Commission Public Meeting 2006 Annual Assessment Meeting for Oyster Creek Name           Title I  Af f iIiation Request to Speak
 
NRC Annual Performance Assessment of Oyster Creek 2006 Reactor Oversight Program
 
Purpose of Todays Meeting NRC will address licensee performance as described in the annual assessment letter.
AmerGen will be given the opportunity to respond to the information in the letter and inform the NRC of new or existing programs to maintain or improve their performance.
AmerGen will be given the opportunity to respond to the information in the letter and inform the NRC of new or existing programs to maintain or improve their performance.
NRC will be available to engage interested stakeholders on performance of the plant and our role in ensuring safe plant operations.
NRC will be available to engage interested stakeholders on performance of the plant and our role in ensuring safe plant operations.
2 Agenda Introduction and NRC Organization Review of NRC Reactor Oversight Process Regulatory Summary of National Plant Performance NRC Assessment of Plant Performance Results AmerGen Response and Remarks NRC Closing Remarks Break NRC Available to Address Public Questions 3
2
Region I Organization I David C. Lew Director Division of Reactor Projects James W. Clifford Samuel J. Collins Regional Administrator I Marc L. Dapas Deputy Regional Administrator Oyster Creek Project Engineers Resident Inspectors Scott Barber-Senior PE Marc Ferdas-SRI Dr Ronald Bellamy Branch Chief Andrew Rosebrook-PE I / \ Marsha K. Gamberoni Director Division of Reactor Safety John R. Tappert Acting Deputy Director I Regional Specialists d 4 NRC Representatives 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Samuel J. Collins, Regional Administrator, Region 1 David C. Lew, Director, Division Reactor Projects Dr. Ronald Bellamy, Chief, Division Reactor Projects, Branch 6 Richard Conte, Chief, Division Reactor Safety, Eng. Branch 1 Harold K. Chernoff, Chief, Plant Licensing Branch 1-2, NRR Edward Miller, Project Manager, NRR Marc Ferdas, Senior Resident Inspector Ryan Treadway, Resident Inspector (610) 337-5299 (610) 337-5229 (610) 337-5200 (610) 337-5183 (301) 415-4018 (301) 415-2481 (609) 693-0702 (609) 693-0702 5 NRC Performance Goals 0 0 0 0 0 Safety: Ensure protection of the public health and safety and the environment.
 
Security:
Agenda Introduction and NRC Organization Review of NRC Reactor Oversight Process Regulatory Summary of National Plant Performance NRC Assessment of Plant Performance Results AmerGen Response and Remarks NRC Closing Remarks Break NRC Available to Address Public Questions 3
Ensure the secure use and management of radioactive materials.
 
Openness: Ensure openness in our regulatory process.
Region I Organization Samuel J. Collins Regional Administrator Marc L. Dapas Deputy Regional Administrator I
Effectiveness: Ensure that NRC actions are effective, efficient, realistic, and timely.
                                                            /                                      \
Management: Ensure excellence in agency management to carry out the NRC's strategic objective.
I David C. Lew                                           Marsha K. Gamberoni Director Division of Reactor Projects                       Director Division of Reactor Safety James W. Clifford                                             John R. Tappert Acting Deputy Director I
6 Reactor Oversight Process Regulatory Response 7 Examples of Baseline Inspection Areas Equipment Alignment Triennial Fire Protection Operator Response Emergency Preparedness Radiation Release Controls Worker Radiation Protection Corrective Action Program Corrective Action Case Reviews a
Dr Ronald Bellamy Branch Chief d      Regional Specialists I
Significance Threshold Performance Indicators Green: White: Yellow: Red: Only Baseline increase Requires Requires InsDection Findines Green: White: Yellow: Red: Inspection more NRC more NRC Low NRC oversight Very Low oversight oversight safety issue to moderate safety issue Substantial safety High safety issue issue 9 Action Matrix Concept Licensee Response Regulatory Degraded Multiplemep.
Oyster Creek                                     Project Engineers Resident Inspectors                               Scott Barber-Senior PE Marc Ferdas-SRI                                 Andrew Rosebrook-PE 4
Unacceptable Response Cornerstone Degraded Performance Corners tone Increasing Safety Significance Increasing NRC Inspection Efforts Increasing NRCLicensee Management Involvement Increasing Regulatory Actions 10 Regulatory Summary of National Plant Performance (Status at End of 2006) Licensee Response Regulatory Response Degraded Cornerstone MultipleRepetitive Degraded Cornerstone Unacceptable 70 24 3 Total 103 National Summary Performance Indicator Results (at end of 2006) Green White Yellow Red 1843 11 0 0 Total Inspection Findings (2006) Green White Yellow Red 676 13 0 0 12 NRC Inspection Activities at Oyster Creek (Jan 1 - Dec 31,2006) 8023 hours of inspection and related activities* 2 Resident Inspectors assigned to the site 23 Regional Inspectors 5 Team Inspections *Excludes Headquarters' Licensee Renewal activities 13 NRC Inspection Activities at Oyster Creek (Jan 1 - Dec 31,2006) Completed a Completed a Specialized Plant Security Review Problem Identification and Resolution (PER) Team Inspection Completed a Plant Modifications Performed Licensee Renewal and Commitment Inspections I Team Inspection Licensee Renewal Completed a 95002 Supplemental.
 
Team Inspection 14 Inspection Findings and Performance Indicators All performance indicators were green (very low safety significance) in 2006. Sixteen Green inspection findings were identified during 2006. One White inspection finding from August 2005 remains open.
NRC Representatives 0 Samuel J. Collins, Regional Administrator, Region 1 (610) 337-5299 0 David C. Lew, Director, Division Reactor Projects (610) 337-5229 0 Dr. Ronald Bellamy, Chief, Division Reactor Projects, Branch 6 (610) 337-5200 0 Richard Conte, Chief, Division Reactor Safety, Eng. Branch 1 (610) 337-5183 0 Harold K. Chernoff, Chief, Plant Licensing Branch 1-2, NRR (301) 415-4018 0 Edward Miller, Project Manager, NRR (301) 415-2481 0 Marc Ferdas, Senior Resident Inspector (609) 693-0702 0 Ryan Treadway, Resident Inspector (609) 693-0702 5
15 NRC Assessment of Oyster Creek (Jan 1 - Dec 31,2006) The plant operated safely.
 
Plant was in Regulatory Response Column of the Action Matrix (cornerstone objectives fully met). The NRC conducted a supplemental inspection in May 2006 to address two White emergency preparedness inspection findings.
NRC Performance Goals 0 Safety: Ensure protection of the public health and safety and the environment.
The supplemental inspection was not able to close the August 2005 White finding.
0 Security: Ensure the secure use and management of radioactive materials.
0 Openness: Ensure openness in our regulatory process.
0 Effectiveness: Ensure that NRC actions are effective, efficient, realistic, and timely.
0 Management: Ensure excellence in agency management to carry out the NRCs strategic objective.
6
 
Reactor Oversight Process Regulatory Response 7
 
Examples of Baseline Inspection Areas Equipment Alignment Triennial Fire Protection Operator Response Emergency Preparedness Radiation Release Controls Worker Radiation Protection Corrective Action Program Corrective Action Case Reviews a
 
Significance Threshold Performance Indicators Green:     Only Baseline Inspection White:         increase NRC oversight Yellow:     Requires more NRC oversight Red:       Requires more NRC oversight InsDection Findines Green:     Very Low safety issue White:      Low to moderate safety issue Yellow:    Substantial safety issue Red:        High safety issue           9
 
Action Matrix Concept Licensee Regulatory Degraded   Multiplemep. Unacceptable Response Response    Cornerstone Degraded     Performance Cornerstone Increasing Safety Significance Increasing NRC Inspection Efforts Increasing NRCLicensee Management Involvement Increasing Regulatory Actions                                 10
 
Regulatory Summary of National Plant Performance (Status at End of 2006)
Licensee Response                           70 Regulatory Response                         24 Degraded Cornerstone MultipleRepetitive Degraded Cornerstone       3 Unacceptable Total                                     103
 
National Summary Performance Indicator Results (at end of 2006)
Green       1843 White       11 Yellow     0 Red         0 Total Inspection Findings (2006)
Green       676 White       13 Yellow     0 Red         0 12
 
NRC Inspection Activities at Oyster Creek (Jan 1 - Dec 31,2006) 8023 hours of inspection and related activities*
2 Resident Inspectors assigned to the site 23 Regional Inspectors 5 Team Inspections 13
*Excludes Headquarters' Licensee Renewal activities
 
NRC Inspection Activities at Oyster Creek (Jan 1 - Dec 31,2006)
Completed a Specialized Plant Security Review Completed a Problem Identification and Resolution
( P E R ) Team Inspection Completed a Plant Modifications Team Inspection I
Performed Licensee Renewal and Licensee Renewal Commitment Inspections Completed a 95002 Supplemental.Team Inspection 14
 
Inspection Findings and Performance Indicators All performance indicators were green (very low safety significance) in 2006.
Sixteen Green inspection findings were identified during 2006.
One White inspection finding from August 2005 remains open.
15
 
NRC Assessment of Oyster Creek (Jan 1 - Dec 31,2006)
The plant operated safely.
Plant was in Regulatory Response Column of the Action Matrix (cornerstone objectives fully met).
The NRC conducted a supplemental inspection in May 2006 to address two White emergency preparedness inspection findings. The supplemental inspection was not able to close the August 2005 White finding.
In 2007, the NRC plans to perform a 95001 Supplemental Inspection in addition to baseline inspections.
In 2007, the NRC plans to perform a 95001 Supplemental Inspection in addition to baseline inspections.
16 NRC Assessment of Oyster Creek (continued) Substantive cross-cutting issue in the human performance aspect of procedural adherence identified.
16
 
NRC Assessment of Oyster Creek (continued)
Substantive cross-cutting issue in the human performance aspect of procedural adherence identified.
Opened in the 2006 Mid-Cycle Performance Review letter dated August 3 1 2006. (ML0624401990)
Opened in the 2006 Mid-Cycle Performance Review letter dated August 3 1 2006. (ML0624401990)
Opened due to one White and three Green findings sharing this common theme. Remains open because AmerGen has not demonstrated sufficient performance improvement in this area.
Opened due to one White and three Green findings sharing this common theme.
17 NRC Assessment of Oyster Creek (continued) Cross-cutting theme in the human performance aspect of Error Prevention Techniques. Four Green findings shared this common theme in 2006. AmerGen has identified the issues and entered it into their corrective action program for resolution.
Remains open because AmerGen has not demonstrated sufficient performance improvement in this area.
18 NRC Annual Assessment Summary at Oyster Creek 0 0 0 (Jan 1 - Dec 31,2006) AmerGen operated Oyster Creek in a manner that A J preserved public health and safety. All cornerstone objectives were met.
17
The NRC plans to perform a supplemelltal inspectiun in addition to the baseline inspections at Oyster Creek in 2007. 19 Licensee Response and Remarks Mr. Timothy Rausch Site Vice President-Oyster Creek AmerGen Energy LLC 20 Contacting the NRC Report an emergency (301) 816-5100 (call collect) Report a safety concern:
 
(800) 695-7403 Allegation  
NRC Assessment of Oyster Creek (continued)
@ nrc.gov General information or questions www.nrc.gov - Select "About NRC" for Public Affairs 21 Reference Sources Reactor Oversight Process http ://w ww .nrc . govNRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSES S/index. html 0 Public Electronic Reading Room http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm.html 0 Public Document Room 1-800-397-4209 (Toll Free) 22}}
Cross-cutting theme in the human performance aspect of Error Prevention Techniques.
Four Green findings shared this common theme in 2006.
AmerGen has identified the issues and entered it into their corrective action program for resolution.
18
 
NRC Annual Assessment Summary at Oyster Creek (Jan 1 - Dec 31,2006) 0 AmerGen operated Oyster Creek in a manner that A         J preserved public health and safety.
0 All cornerstone objectives were met.
0 The NRC plans to perform a supplemelltal inspectiun in addition to the baseline inspections at Oyster Creek in 2007.
19
 
Licensee Response and Remarks Mr. Timothy Rausch Site Vice President-Oyster Creek AmerGen Energy LLC 20
 
Contacting the NRC Report an emergency (301) 816-5100 (call collect)
Report a safety concern:
(800) 695-7403 Allegation @ nrc.gov General information or questions www.nrc.gov Select About NRC for Public Affairs 21
 
Reference Sources Reactor Oversight Process http ://www .nrc.govNRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/index.html 0 Public Electronic Reading Room http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm.html 0 Public Document Room 1-800-397-4209 (Toll Free) 22}}

Latest revision as of 15:32, 13 March 2020

Feedback Forms, List of Attendees, & Final Slides from the Oyster Creek 2007 Annual Assessment Meeting (Aam)
ML071520436
Person / Time
Site: Oyster Creek
Issue date: 05/23/2007
From: Laird J, Tauro J
Exelon Corp, Grammes
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
Download: ML071520436 (28)
v • d • e


Text

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMlSSlOl Category NRC PUBLIC MEETING FEEDBACK 1

Aeeting Meeting late: 05/23/2007

Title:

NRC Annual Assessment Meeting of Oyster Creek

__ - - - ~~ ~~ ~ ~- -

n order to better serve the public, we need to hear from the meeting participants. Please take a few minutes to fill out his feedback form and return it to NRC.

1. How did you hear about this meetinq?

E]NRC Web Page E] NRC Mailing List E Newspaper Radio/'TV No Somewhat Yes JPlease explain below)

2. Were you able to find supporting information prior to the meeting?

0 0 0

3. Did the meeting achieve its stated purpose? 0 0
1. Has this meeting helped you with your understanding of the topic?

cl 0 0

1. Were the meeting starting time, duration, and location reasonably convenient?

0 0

3. Were you given sufficient opportunity to ask questions or express your views?
7. Are you satisfied overall with the NRC staff who participated in the meeting?

0 0 0

OMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS
Thank you for answering these questions.

5 Lr-Lha@- h / -- -5 P -

Continue Comments on the reverse. 4 relephone No. 7 3s -$$?s ~ - E-Mail 0 memberCheck here if you would like a of NRC staff to contact you.

)MB NO 3150-0197 3a v Expires: 06/30/2009

'ublic Protection Notdication II a means used to i d e an information colleclion does not dlsplay a currently valid OMB control number, the NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person le lot required to respond to. the inlormation collection Please fold on the dotted lines with Business Reply side out, tape the bottom, and mail back to the NRC.

US. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION NRC PUBLIC MEETING FEEDBACK Aeeting Meeting late: 05/23/2007

Title:

NRC Annual Assessment Meeting of Oyster Creek

~ - - _ _ _ ~_ ~ ___ _ __ ~~~~~~~ ~~~ ~- -

n order to better serve the public, we need to hear from the meeting participants. Please take a few minutes to fill out his feedback form and return it to NRC.

1. How did you hear about this meetinq?

NRCWebPage 111 NRC Mailing List 7Newspaper a RadronV

~~~

No Somewhat Yes Please exdain below)

2. Were you able to find supporting information prior to the meeting?

0

3. Did the meeting achieve its stated purpose? 0
4. Has this meeting helped you with your understanding of the topic?
5. Were the meeting starting time, d u d o n , and location reasonably convenient?
6. Were you given sufficient opportunity to ask questions or express your views?

U 0

7. Are you satisfied overall with the NRC staff who participated in the meeting?

ZOMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS: Thank you for answering these questions.

Continue Comments on the reverse. Q relephone ~ o . 610 76<@>2

~ ~~ .-

-Mail Check here if you would like a member of NRC staff to contact you

)ME NO 3150-0197 Expires 06/30/2009

'uMic Protection Noliftcallon If a means used lo impose an informationcollection does not display a currently valid OMB control number. the NRC may not conduct or sponsor. and a person IS 101 required to respond lo. the informationcollection Please fold on the dotted lines with Business Reply side out, tape the bottom, and mail back to the NRC.

May 23,2007 Nuclear Regulatory Commission Public Meeting 2006 Annual Assessment Meeting for Oyster Creek Name Title Affiliation Request to Speak 5

I

May 23,2007 Nuclear Regulatory Commission Public Meeting 2006 Annual Assessment Meeting for Oyster Creek

~

Name Title Affiliation Request to Speak

--?-IT+ -

7

May 23,2007 Nuclear Regulatory Commission Public Meeting 2006 Annual Assessment Meeting for Oyster Creek Name Title Affiliation Request to Speak

May 23,2007 Nuclear Regulatory Commission Public Meeting 2006 Annual Assessment Meeting for Oyster Creek Name Title I Af f iIiation Request to Speak

NRC Annual Performance Assessment of Oyster Creek 2006 Reactor Oversight Program

Purpose of Todays Meeting NRC will address licensee performance as described in the annual assessment letter.

AmerGen will be given the opportunity to respond to the information in the letter and inform the NRC of new or existing programs to maintain or improve their performance.

NRC will be available to engage interested stakeholders on performance of the plant and our role in ensuring safe plant operations.

2

Agenda Introduction and NRC Organization Review of NRC Reactor Oversight Process Regulatory Summary of National Plant Performance NRC Assessment of Plant Performance Results AmerGen Response and Remarks NRC Closing Remarks Break NRC Available to Address Public Questions 3

Region I Organization Samuel J. Collins Regional Administrator Marc L. Dapas Deputy Regional Administrator I

/ \

I David C. Lew Marsha K. Gamberoni Director Division of Reactor Projects Director Division of Reactor Safety James W. Clifford John R. Tappert Acting Deputy Director I

Dr Ronald Bellamy Branch Chief d Regional Specialists I

Oyster Creek Project Engineers Resident Inspectors Scott Barber-Senior PE Marc Ferdas-SRI Andrew Rosebrook-PE 4

NRC Representatives 0 Samuel J. Collins, Regional Administrator, Region 1 (610) 337-5299 0 David C. Lew, Director, Division Reactor Projects (610) 337-5229 0 Dr. Ronald Bellamy, Chief, Division Reactor Projects, Branch 6 (610) 337-5200 0 Richard Conte, Chief, Division Reactor Safety, Eng. Branch 1 (610) 337-5183 0 Harold K. Chernoff, Chief, Plant Licensing Branch 1-2, NRR (301) 415-4018 0 Edward Miller, Project Manager, NRR (301) 415-2481 0 Marc Ferdas, Senior Resident Inspector (609) 693-0702 0 Ryan Treadway, Resident Inspector (609) 693-0702 5

NRC Performance Goals 0 Safety: Ensure protection of the public health and safety and the environment.

0 Security: Ensure the secure use and management of radioactive materials.

0 Openness: Ensure openness in our regulatory process.

0 Effectiveness: Ensure that NRC actions are effective, efficient, realistic, and timely.

0 Management: Ensure excellence in agency management to carry out the NRCs strategic objective.

6

Reactor Oversight Process Regulatory Response 7

Examples of Baseline Inspection Areas Equipment Alignment Triennial Fire Protection Operator Response Emergency Preparedness Radiation Release Controls Worker Radiation Protection Corrective Action Program Corrective Action Case Reviews a

Significance Threshold Performance Indicators Green: Only Baseline Inspection White: increase NRC oversight Yellow: Requires more NRC oversight Red: Requires more NRC oversight InsDection Findines Green: Very Low safety issue White: Low to moderate safety issue Yellow: Substantial safety issue Red: High safety issue 9

Action Matrix Concept Licensee Regulatory Degraded Multiplemep. Unacceptable Response Response Cornerstone Degraded Performance Cornerstone Increasing Safety Significance Increasing NRC Inspection Efforts Increasing NRCLicensee Management Involvement Increasing Regulatory Actions 10

Regulatory Summary of National Plant Performance (Status at End of 2006)

Licensee Response 70 Regulatory Response 24 Degraded Cornerstone MultipleRepetitive Degraded Cornerstone 3 Unacceptable Total 103

National Summary Performance Indicator Results (at end of 2006)

Green 1843 White 11 Yellow 0 Red 0 Total Inspection Findings (2006)

Green 676 White 13 Yellow 0 Red 0 12

NRC Inspection Activities at Oyster Creek (Jan 1 - Dec 31,2006) 8023 hours0.0929 days <br />2.229 hours <br />0.0133 weeks <br />0.00305 months <br /> of inspection and related activities*

2 Resident Inspectors assigned to the site 23 Regional Inspectors 5 Team Inspections 13

  • Excludes Headquarters' Licensee Renewal activities

NRC Inspection Activities at Oyster Creek (Jan 1 - Dec 31,2006)

Completed a Specialized Plant Security Review Completed a Problem Identification and Resolution

( P E R ) Team Inspection Completed a Plant Modifications Team Inspection I

Performed Licensee Renewal and Licensee Renewal Commitment Inspections Completed a 95002 Supplemental.Team Inspection 14

Inspection Findings and Performance Indicators All performance indicators were green (very low safety significance) in 2006.

Sixteen Green inspection findings were identified during 2006.

One White inspection finding from August 2005 remains open.

15

NRC Assessment of Oyster Creek (Jan 1 - Dec 31,2006)

The plant operated safely.

Plant was in Regulatory Response Column of the Action Matrix (cornerstone objectives fully met).

The NRC conducted a supplemental inspection in May 2006 to address two White emergency preparedness inspection findings. The supplemental inspection was not able to close the August 2005 White finding.

In 2007, the NRC plans to perform a 95001 Supplemental Inspection in addition to baseline inspections.

16

NRC Assessment of Oyster Creek (continued)

Substantive cross-cutting issue in the human performance aspect of procedural adherence identified.

Opened in the 2006 Mid-Cycle Performance Review letter dated August 3 1 2006. (ML0624401990)

Opened due to one White and three Green findings sharing this common theme.

Remains open because AmerGen has not demonstrated sufficient performance improvement in this area.

17

NRC Assessment of Oyster Creek (continued)

Cross-cutting theme in the human performance aspect of Error Prevention Techniques.

Four Green findings shared this common theme in 2006.

AmerGen has identified the issues and entered it into their corrective action program for resolution.

18

NRC Annual Assessment Summary at Oyster Creek (Jan 1 - Dec 31,2006) 0 AmerGen operated Oyster Creek in a manner that A J preserved public health and safety.

0 All cornerstone objectives were met.

0 The NRC plans to perform a supplemelltal inspectiun in addition to the baseline inspections at Oyster Creek in 2007.

19

Licensee Response and Remarks Mr. Timothy Rausch Site Vice President-Oyster Creek AmerGen Energy LLC 20

Contacting the NRC Report an emergency (301) 816-5100 (call collect)

Report a safety concern:

(800) 695-7403 Allegation @ nrc.gov General information or questions www.nrc.gov Select About NRC for Public Affairs 21

Reference Sources Reactor Oversight Process http ://www .nrc.govNRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/index.html 0 Public Electronic Reading Room http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm.html 0 Public Document Room 1-800-397-4209 (Toll Free) 22

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML071520436&oldid=2576766"