ML032300033

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
State of the Fleet Presentation
ML032300033
Person / Time
Site: Oyster Creek
Issue date: 07/30/2003
From:
Exelon Nuclear
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
Download: ML032300033 (40)
v • d • e


Text

.

Exelon Nuclear State of the Fleet Presentation July 30, 2003

-7-0

7.

1

-j-WN FEnclosure 2

I State of the Fleet Presentation

~~~~~~~~~~~~~M

-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Introductions and Opening Remarks The Exelon Way Initiative Fleet Performance Summary Equipment Reliability Fuel Reliability Oyster Creek Update Regulatory Performance Nuclear Oversight Perspectives Closing Remarks Jack Skolds Jack Skolds Chip Pardee Bill Bohlke Bill Bohike Bill Levis Jeff Benjamin Bob Braun Jack Skolds 1

The Exelon Way Initiative Jack Skolds Chief Nuclear Officer

Exelon Way Model Characteristics New Model Key Dimensions

-3 0

S S.

Support Functions -

One Source Business Units -

One Model Operating Processes -

One Approach

  • Realign support resources c Restructure the business units v Optimize investments

- Standardize processes v Simplify the business

  • Create a culture of excellence 3

Exelon Nuclear High-Level Organization Effective By Aug. 1, 2003 I

~~~

I i

0*1

0*

El 5..

;W-W--Vffl I

..U.

[Fi1 ste

.l VPs l1 I

LI II I

Suppc o

I Finance I

_ICo mmUn catio s Ucensing l

Emergency I Preparedness Environmental 4

Exelon Nuclear Focus Areas

  • Operational Execution and Safety
  • Equipment Reliability
  • Fuel Reliability 5

Fleet Performance Summary Chip Pardee Senior Vice President Nuclear Services

Exelon Nuclear Performance Overview

  • Continued Solid Performance
  • Key Accomplishments o Integration of Operational Fundamentals o Implementation of Management Model o Talent Management
  • Continuing Areas of Focus o Operational Execution and Safety o Change Management o Collective Radiation Exposure o Technical Issue Resolution o Equipment Reliability o Fuel Reliability o Oyster Creek o Emergency Preparedness 7

Opportunity for Improvement - Exelon Nuclear Of the 11 large nuclear fleet operators, Exelon Nuclear was INPO Index Capacity Factor Highest INPO Index

.7 -=*--1 Highest Capacity Factor Production Cost

r.

Lowest Prod.

Cost 1st A hL A

3rd 3rd 5th 6th 7th IL 2nd 5th 7th A L 2000 2001 2002 Lowest INPO Index 2000 2001 I Lowest 2002 Capacity Factor 2000 2001 I

I 2002 Highest Prod.

Cost Continued focus on operational excellence, equipment fI reliability, refueling outages, and forced loss rate 8

Operational Execution and Safety INPO Performance Index 96 95 O 94 O 93 z92 91 90 2000 2001 2002 2003 YrD/YEP 0 Exelon Average Exelon Year-end Projection Quartile Exelon Plants Values 1st Quartile 99.1 BW-2, LGS-1, LGS-2, BY-2, LA-1 2nd Quartile 95.7 BY-1, PB-3, BW-1, OC-1, DR-2 3rd Quartile 87.7 PB-2, LA-2, CL, TMI-1, DR-3 4th Quartile

<87.7 QC-2, QC-1 9

Operational Execution and Safety INPO Performance Index 100 98 96-95.5 3.08 1r=

.4 92.3 t5 94

~ l l

1.42 4.11 92 1.30 90~

0

.2 0.55 0.27.-

0.55 0.27.550.1 0

-i

!SL{I f

=

88 Adverse trend is primarily due to:

  • Collective radiation exposure
  • Fuel Defects a Forced Loss Rate and Capability Factor
  • Actions to Address Negative Trend
  • Collective Radiation Exposure Initiative
  • Actions to address Forced Loss Rate, and Capability Factor performance issues
  • Resolving fuel integrity issues 10

"S Operational Execution and Safety Human Performance Station Event Clock Resets OSHA Recordable Accident Rate Per 200,000 person-hours Human Error Scrams 100 -

80 -

60 -

40 -

20 -

0.

H I1-028.

0.6 CA 02.

a H

A

[1 12 10.

8 6

4.

2 n

F]

n FEu 2000 2001 2002 2003 0 Exelon Performance U Exelon Year-end Projection 2000 2001 2002 2003 YTDN'EP a Exelon Performance U Exebn Year-end Projection v

.F-1 2000 2001 2002 2003 0 Exelon Performance U Ekelon Year-end Projection Build on Performance Gains Reinforce the Fundamentals of Safe Nuclear Operation Observation Program Aligned With Fundamentals Implemented Corrective Action Program Fundamentals Trending Conducting Supervisory Training Modules Revised Operating Experience Process 11

Operational Execution and Safety Collective Radiation Exposure 4000 I0 m1 0

1?

.2 1 8

600' 400*

SW O 200 100 0

H I

a -

I 2000 2001 202 2003 l BWR Collective Radlaton Exposure U 2003 YEP 2001 2002 2O03 0 PWR Colecte Radiaton Exposure

  • 2003 YEP Radiation Dose Reduction Initiative Permanent Shielding Hydrolaze Taps Remote Monitoring Technology Pilot at Dresden Accelerated Cobalt Source Term Reduction for Quad Cities Chemical Decon for Quad Cities Strategy for NMC Re-application Following Chemical Decon PWR Zinc Injection BWR Ultrasonic Fuel Cleaning Technology 12

Generation Commitment Capacity Factor o~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-

11 I

-1111 i

Exelon Capacity Factor 2003 YTD Generation Losses 0

O...

a U-i t.

6 1

95.7 0.2 t ss I

5 04 IL (3 S3 mem 0

1.0 1.7 02 0.4 M

-I 1 4-2000 2001 2002 2003 YTDNEP II I

1ll I acelon Average Capacity Factor 2003 Year-end Prolectin I bI II I

Gaps:

  • Forced Outages and Downpowers Due to Equipment Reliability Issues
  • Fuel Integrity Issues
  • Quad Cities Steam Dryer
  • Dresden Hydrogen Leak Actions to Address Negative Trend:
  • Validating Actions in Equipment Reliability Program to Ensure Adequacy
  • Resolving Fuel Integrity Issues 13

Technical Issue Resolution

  • Lessons Learned / Insights o Enhancing Technical Basis for Critical Decision Making o More Aggressive / Complete Use of Technical Experts o More Effective Coordination at Senior Team Level on Critical Decisions o Sharpen Focus on Plant Events o Licensing / Engineering Alignment on Emerging Regulatory Issues o More Structured Communication with NRC 14

Equip.ment Reliability Bill Bohike Senior Vice President p~~~~~~~~

_6 i

I 3iiW S X 1~~~~~~~~~

Equipment Reliability 2002 Forced Loss Rate Contributors 1.90 0.72 2.0 1.8 1.6 1.6 l

l0.33 1.2 U.

IL10 0.31 o1.

0.,

0.6

~~~~~~0.16 00

.8 00

.7 00

0.

____~~~~~~~~~00 0.0-~~~~

4-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-

C

~C CM E

~~~

0-0 c

CL c

w C

IL C)

C~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~C 16

Equipment Reliability 2003 Forced Loss Rate Contributors Through June EDG Cable(OC),

Dryer(QDC)

Condensate Pump 2.5 Trip(LA), Heater Tube 0.57 2.5 -

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Leak(LA),05 Generator(DRE) 2-MSIV Accumulator leak(DR),

0.52 MSIV Closure(PB), PORV 1.5 Spurious Opening(QC)

Condensate Polisher

-0tR 1 1 lsolatlon(LI) 0 0.5 Leaking PORV 0.89 I

0 (QDC) 0.08 17

Equipment Reliability Challenges

  • Equipment Reliability Process o What has been completed?

o How are we doing?

o What lies ahead? 2004 - 2006

  • Long Term Planning and Assessment Management Strategies
  • Fuel Integrity Issues
  • Summary of Challenges 18

Equipment Reliabiliy

  • What Has Been Completed So Far o System Single Point Vulnerability Reviews o Scram Derate Challenge Reviews o System Performance Monitoring Plans (Complete Except Oyster Creek, Due 8/30/03) o 154 PCM Templates in Production o Obsolescence Program Developed to Implement INPO AP-913 Process o Long Term Asset Management (LTAM) Strategies Issued for 20 Major Components o Process Developed to Track Unexpected Corrective Maintenance (CM-U) 19

r Equipment Reliability Improvements Completed In 2002 Switchyard / Main Power o

BYR - Main Power Transformer Replacement o

CLN - Main Power Transformer Sudden Pressure Relay V Turbine / Generator o

BWD - Generator Stator Replacement o CLN - Extraction Steam Bellows Replacement o

CLN - Generator Rewind o

DRE/LAS - Hydrogen Cooler Replacement o

LIM/QDC - EHC Isolation Valves Circulating Water/ Condensate o

LAS/DRE - Condenser Chemical Cleaning o

LIM - Cooling Tower Wind Vanes o

PBM - Condensate Pump Motor Replacement o

TMI - Chem Addition for CW Reactor Recirculation/Feed Water o

LAS - Digital Recirc & Feedwater o

PBM - Feed Water Heater Replacement Dose Reduction o LIM/PBM/OYC - Drywell Permanent Shielding o

PBM - Zinc Injection Additional Improvements o Various - Circuit Card Replacement o OYC - Replaced Main Steam Line Low Pressure Sensors With Analog Trip System o OYC - Noble Metal Chemistry o OYC - Process Computer Upgrade o QDC - 250 VDC Cable Replacement 20

Equipment Reliabillty - How are we doing?

  • Performance Driven by Latent Failures -

Process-driven Improvements Noted

  • Fleet Capacity Factor o 2002 actual 92.7%

o 2003 goal 95.3% (currently @ 94.6% after 2nd Qtr) o Top Industry quartile 93.5%

  • Forced Loss Rate Performance o 2002 actual 1.9%

o 2003 goal 1.1% (currently @ 2.3% after 2nd Qtr) o Top Industry quartile 0.9%

  • Exelon's Equipment Reliability Indicator Trend Has Flattened in 2nd Quarter After Improved 1 t Quarter 21

Equipment Reliability - what lies ahead

  • Complete Latent Failure Reviews
  • Complete SDC/SSPV Actions Resulting From Site Reviews
  • Continue to Implement System Performance Monitoring Plans
  • Pursuing Automation of Advanced "Early Detection" Technologies to Identify Degrading Systems &

Components

  • Identification & Confirmation of Critical Spares
  • Continue to Improve PCM Templates Using Learnings From Events (Internal and External) and CR Trending 22

r Equipment Reliability - what lies ahead

  • Implement Long Term System and Component Plans Into PHC/MCIP Process
  • Work LTAM Strategies Into MCIP Process
  • Review of SDC Results to Address Recent Passive Equipment Failures That Lead to Significant MW Losses (Inst. Tubing)
  • Drive Unplanned Corrective Maintenance (CM-U) to Zero
  • Continued Refinement of On-line Maintenance Techniques
  • Related Activity: Further Improvements in Maintenance Optimization 23

Equipment Reliability Improvements Planned for 2003 -2006 Switchyard / Main Power o All sites - MPT Sudden Pressure Relays o

DRE/QDC - MPT Replacement Turbine / Generator o

BWD - Extraction Steam Bellows Replacement o

BYR - DEHC Replacement o LAS - EHC Filtration Upgrade o LAS - Generator Overhaul o

LIM - Turbine Thrust Bearing Wear Detector o

PBM - Moisture Separator Upgrade o

QDC - EHC Control Replacement Emergency Diesel Generator o

DRE - Generator Refurbishment o LIM - Replace Cylinder Liners Reactor Vessel & Internals o CLN - Shroud Repair o

DRE - Jet Pump Beam Replacement o

DRE - Jet Pump riser Brace o QDC - Jet Pump Sensing Line Circulating Water / Condensate o BWD - C02 Injection Into Circ. Water o

BYR - Replace Condenser Expansion Joint Additional Improvements o Various - PMCEI Card Replacement o

BYRIDRE - Air Compressor Replacement o CLN - Replace DC Ground Detector o

DRE - Re-Tube LPCI Heat Exchanger o LAS - Plant Process Computer Replacement o LAS - Main Control Room Digital Recorders o

OYC - Noble Metal Chem. Addition o QDC - Recirc. Control System o TMI - Breaker Replacement o TMI - Strip Chart Recorder Replacement 24

Long Term Asset Management Strategy g

Outage Length Strategy w

LTAM Strategies O&MtCapital Projections I MOIPI 25

Fuel Reliability Bill Bohike Senior Vice President

Fuel Integrity Issue o 30 Percent of U.S. Units Report Operating With Fuel Defects o Exelon Has Seven Units With Fuel Defects Initiative - Fuel Reliability Improvements o Nuclear Design Improvements o Mechanical Design Improvements o Manufacturing and Material Improvements o Operational Reviews o Fuel Handling/FME Controls Improvements o Water Chemistry Improvements o Additional Fuel Inspections o Vendor Oversight Improvements 27

o^yster Creek Bill Levis Vice President, MidAtlantic Operations

Oyster Creek U pdate i Strike Commenced May 22, 2003

  • Contingency Plan Implemented Quickly and Successfully
  • Plant Is Being Safely Operated
  • Staffed by Non-represented OC and Other Exelon Employees
  • Critical Work Is Being Performed
  • Contract Negotiations Are Proceeding 29

Oyster Creek Update Deferred I Rescheduled Work

  • Focused Area Self-assessments by the Line
  • Continuing Training
  • Modifications
  • Support Activities o Corrective action program backlog o Engineering Quality Review Team on hold o Scorecards o Procedure enhancements 30

Oyster Creek Update Focus Areas e Event-free Operations

  • Workforce qualification and fatigue
  • Enhanced Oversight
  • Development of robust Reintegration Plan 31

Regulatory Perfoeormance Jeff Benjamin Vice President Licensing and Regulatory Services

NRC Performance Indicator s r

r.-- ;---

~'..........~

MId-.IfROG t~ -

-l^

f:1:

.Mid'.trnUoROo hiiioutirn*

ma=

mm

~s GAS QOC LaS 7 a

.B

U14, 15.2' VI-t-J W:-3.2 4
I 14 I4 US2 I 5

U3 51 1.2 63J£1 11 14 Infulaine Evanis Comfutono I

IV M -~ I r

I 1J

[

I - I -

- i

_ hI 11" 0

at rs>,ooo-

~

~

~

=

II Hlfwwm S

we OMD mM

-V~wwd m

rCfng pw 1

1W ltilgafng Dysbmis Corm tn.

  1. WS#

jp~l P

HPCI P

-P

  • -P -

-A-Sably 5y* Ifl U r.Vbu1b/

y RHR HNR RH RR RHR,_

I IR RHR

-1X. I =:

lan C

,A fttv Cwsv C

e m

atnxea T, I <0 XI I

1 11'"

1 1

1 1I1 T

Ti Corne-Won.

~~noo

~

1 I 1

I 1

1 1

11, I

I I1 1

1 11 WaMr EMIy Respoe O

ws fiO 36fdeflode t aid m to n

dm _

I I

Public Radhtlon avt

Ccmeat, a 0 t dlalUon abt Co ton

'btslcuprobcflon o eusofl g

_dao I

l I

1 I I I I I 1

11 1 '1':1z

.My tw

_b l

I1 g p o

l I.

I I

I 1

1 1

1 o1

_~ ~~~OR 33

NRC Inspection Fiondings 4 I Mid-West ROOG I,Mid-Atlantic ROG nection Area RM ~~BY ~

DRE A

[

D j

LS 1

OCK 1 PeBM U

l

U-2

-I U-2 U-I U-2 U4 4

-SU1 U2 u-U-2 U2 initating Events Cornerstone-4012002 1I0 I

a o

3Q/2002

_____j It aIE a

Mitigating Systems Corerstone 2012003

~~

~~~~

~~

~

~

~~~a w

0 0

00 G

1I012003 j 0 0a1:aa 401002

-aO a

a 0

0 0

3012002 a

a I

a 0

0

=2 a

Emergency Preparedness; Cornerstone 2012003 11I~II~-I 1I012003 G

2012003 0

a

____a 11012003 1 a

a 4012002 0-0 3Q12002 a_

W ccPational Radiation-Co=nerst=ne 2=13 4

Y 2012003 I]O 0i i

401002 a

i I I 3012002

-0 0

Public Radiation Safe rson 1012003 a

7I~ 1---

PhYSIcal Protection Cornerstone 2012003 I

II I

412002 1 t I

1010032 II 3=002 I

01 I

1 E

1 34

Regulatory Performance

  • Security o Implementing NRC Orders o Assessing Necessary Changes for Revised Design Basis Threat
  • Emergency Preparedness Focus Areas o Improving Kennett Square Performance o Maintaining Effective Offsite Interfaces o Maintaining ERO Performance / Proficiency o Completing Siren Upgrades
  • Continued Emphasis on Communication With Regions and Headquarters 35

Nuclear versight Bob Braun

  • Vice President Nuclear Oversight

Nuclear Oversight

  • NOS Organizational Realignment
  • Exelon Way o NOS Impact o NOS Oversight of Implementation
  • NOS Fleet-Wide Focus Areas
  • Employee Concerns Program 37

Employee Concerns Program

  • Routinely Monitor All Areas of Workforce Concern o Grievances o FFD Results o Employee Concerns Program (ECP) o NRC Allegations o EEO Charges o DOL Charges
  • Overall Program Health Improving o SCWE Assessment Completed o ECP Contacts Increasing o External Contacts Decreasing o 9/02 Assessment Noted Strength in Widespread Program Knowledge o FASA Scheduled for 3Q03 38

Closing Remarks, Jack Skolds Chief Nuclear Officer

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML032300033&oldid=5415682"