ML091960559

09/23/2008 DRS Management Briefing Oyster Creek License Renewal Regulatory Footprint, Working Discussion of Issues and Options in Response to RA Questions on a Lr Regulatory Foodprint

ML091960559
Person / Time
Site:	Oyster Creek
Issue date:	06/17/2009
From:	- No Known Affiliation
To:	NRC Region 1
References
FOIA/PA-2009-0070
Download: ML091960559 (6)

Text

Off$iu,"0U'0(vASehitive inter)6l ,nfga.

DRS Management Briefing Oyster Creek License Renewal Regulatory Footprint Sept 23, 2008 10:00 to 11:00 AM

>>> Post Meeting Notes <<<

Purpose Working Discussion of Issues and Options.

In response to RA questions on a LR Regulatory Footprint.

Success Determine Where We Are Headed.

Management Information Needs are Satisfied.

Agenda

1. Opening Remarks rjc (2 minute)

2. Current Course jer (1 minute)

3. Key Stakeholders and Stakeholder Interests all (6 minutes)

4. Is There a Problem with Commitments & Lic. Conditions all (15 minute)

5. Regulatory Options all (20 minute)

6. Key Players for RA Brief (Oct. 1) all (2 minute)

7. Other Issues - Looking Forward jer (3 minute)

Attendees [actual wa. 5 approx 75 minutes]

Darrell Roberts, Dep. Dir. DRS Karl Farrar, Regional Counsel Mary Baty, OGC Louise Lund, DLR Dave Pelton, DLR Rich Conte, DRS John Richmond, 71003 Team Leader Michael Modes, Regional LR Expert (and 71002 Team Lead)

Bob Summers, Regional OE Marjorie McLaughlin, SLO Diane Screnci, PAO Scott Barber, DRP Justin Heinly, DRP bkbMs"on hth~ r@=ovd wade9lsted 0 ir-e`UsAOnlv-- Se 4 A tiVe Intl f6n*

f0Cion aCCOMMO Wf he.Fredomof,* ,, -

ExemoiwA b/4 FOIAPA 00- -

06- Snive Inte, ,, nation

1. OPENING REMARKS 1.1 Conduct of Briefing

a. Conduct briefing as a working discussion

b. Keep discussion fairly high level

c. Focus on desired outcome - not the details of how to get there 1.2 Discussion Content

a. Identify what issues we need Options for (e.g., what are we trying to achieve, solve, or prevent)

b. Discuss our perceptions of what the various stakeholders expect

c. Discuss which organization should take the lead and who is needed for key support

d. Build on this working discussion with Darrell - for the briefing with Sam

2. CURRENT COURSE 2.1 NRC to continue on course, as though the OC license had been renewed

.b. R-l~ti(b)

a. We Assume AmerGen will continue to imolement commitments, with no aoDs (5) spection Activities - 71003 Planning in-progress, no gaps expected 71003 Insnection. oer 2515 AoD-C. with RA arproval L (b)(5)7

3. KEY STAKEHOLDERS AND STAKEHOLDER INTERESTS 3.1 Stakeholders

a. NRC [Commision, ASLB, DLR, OGC, Region-i]

b. AmerGen [Exelon]

c. NJ State DEP

d. NJ State & Local Legislators

e. Webster [Citizens]

f. Media [Local NJ Press]

3.2 Stakeholder Interests

a. NJ State DEP Interface - Open & Transparent Sharing of Information (as allowed by the MOU)

Four Principle DEP Concerns (1) Drywell Liner Condition (71003 Outage Inspection Item)

(2) 3-D Finite Element Analysis - Technical Review (NRR/DLR Review of AmerGen Summary Report)

(3) Fatigue Monitoring Calculation - Technical Review (?? need DLR input)

[DLR comment: NJ DEP is satisfied with DRL review, as documented in SER Sup-l]

Oyfice U,4 0ly - Se$st!Ve IntevrialInfre; tion

OT~4 U6 OY - Sens ,ntpa,nf aton (4) Combustion Turbine Maintenance Program - Verification of Commitment

• (Future 71003 Non-Outage Inspection Item)

b. NJ State & Local Legislators -- need PAO and SLO Input C. Webster & Citizens -- need PAO and SLO Input

[Action Item for OGC: provide a summary list of issues before the Commission]

4. IS THERE A PROBLEM WITH COMMITMENTS & LICENSE CONDITIONS 4.1 If the license is not renewed by April 9, 2009 ...

What about SER "Proposed Conditions of License" and SER "Commitment List" Requirements vs Expectations Are Proposed Conditions of License and Commitments part of the current CLB? (b)(

Do they have to revise the FSAR to incorporate Aging Management Programs? (b)j If thv did revise the FSAR. doesn't that make the AMPs Dart of the CLB? j- (b()

(b)(5)

Is AmerGen required to implement & manage LR commitments? L/(b) (b),

,Is AmerGen required to use the NEI Commitment Management Program?

in their LR Application?

ro(b) held accountable for anything they said an they be If AmerGen not required to do any of the above -- Then What ?

4.2 Regulatory Tools 13/4>

LR Application not yet approved (b)(5)

(b)(5) e ted '(b)(5)

Docketed etters to perform various tasks[lactionslanalysis ...jer addition]

CLB - Correspondence - FSAR (b)(5) 7 4.3 Outside Stakeholder Perceptions NJ State DEP seems satisfied - has not expressed any concern [yet]

NJ State & rr.;l I .oislators (b)(5)

Webster & Citizens c!*ic U~e Only - Sepd~tive/ntoernal Inforfn non 7

0ff eO U!<O y- Sensie Int al I,'fo~dation Media & Press

5. REGULATORY OPTIONS

- (b)(5)

7 ~

5.1 (b)(5) n.

5.2 Communication Plan with an FAQ (b)(5)

KU 5.3 Exchange of Correspondence with Exelon (b)(5) j)

Office Lo Oýyd - SenoIive In~frfiaI Info$Aation

0.ice',fý2 fI r SA ý~e intey all Inf/omation 5.4 (b)(5)

(b)(5)

(b)(5)

.,1 5.5 .

(b)(5) f L

6. KEY PLAYERS FOR RA BRIEF (OCT. 1)

R-1 Executive Team Karl Farrar, Regional Counsel Mary Baty, OGC Ed Williamson, OGC Brian Holian, DLR Louise Lund, DLR Dave Pelton, DLR Bob Summers, Regional OE Ron Bellamy, DRP (b)(5)

J Marc Ferdas, OC SRI Rich Conte, DRS John Richmond, 71003 Team Leader Michael Modes, Regional LR Expert (and 71002 Team Lead)

Marjorie McLaughlin, SLO Diane Screnci, PAO ANY OTHERS ? (b)(5) 2

\J Optice Uý6 ý1'ny - Sen~itive Int rna! Inf '6ation

O :e U/ QA Sen~ive Intry4 In rralion (b)(5)

7. OTHER ISSUES - LOOKING FORWARD 7.1 What happens if OC does not get a renewed license?

Why did we do a 71003 inspection?

7.2 7.3 (b)(5)

O U '- Seqsive Int$nal Inforirtion