ML12291A700: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 17: Line 17:
=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:2012 DRESDEN NUCLEAR POWER STATION INITIAL EXAMINATION PROPOSED EXAM FILES
{{#Wiki_filter:2012 DRESDEN NUCLEAR POWER STATION INITIAL EXAMINATION PROPOSED EXAM FILES
* ES-301 Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist Form ES-301-4
* ES-301 Facility: Dresden Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist Date of Exam: S/6I12         Scenario Numbers: 1 12/3 QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES Form ES-301-4 Operating Test Number: 11-1 (2012-301)
* ES-301, Page 25 of Facility:
Ini~ials a       b*     c#
Dresden Date of Exam: S/6I12 Scenario Numbers: 1 12/3 Operating Test Number: 11-1 (2012-301)
: 1.         The initial conditions are realistic, in that some equipment and/or Instrumentation may be out of service, but it does not cue the operators Into expected events.                                       j'      ~
QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES a b* c# 1. The initial conditions are realistic, in that some equipment and/or Instrumentation may be out of j' -service, but it does not cue the operators Into expected events. 2. The scenarios consist mostly of related events. "i':) 3. Each event description consists of
: 2.         The scenarios consist mostly of related events.                                                         ~    "i':)
* the point in the scenario when it is to be Initiated  
M~
#* the malfunction(s) that are entered to initiate the event -;::>
: 3.         Each event description consists of
* the point in the scenario when it is to be Initiated
* the malfunction(s) that are entered to initiate the event
* the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew
* the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew
                                                                                                                    # -;::>        nt~
* the expected operator actions (by shift position)
* the expected operator actions (by shift position)
* the event termination point (if applicable)
* the event termination point (if applicable)
: 4. No more than one non-mechanistic failure (e.g., pipe break) is incorporated Into the scenario ;:t ? IWtJ without a credible preceding incident such as a seismic event. 5. The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics. ? 6. Sequencing and timing of events is reasonable, and allows the examination team to obtain complete evaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives.
: 4.         No more than one non-mechanistic failure (e.g., pipe break) is incorporated Into the scenario without a credible preceding incident such as a seismic event.                                       ;:t ?            IWtJ
t::> 7. If time compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates.
                                                                                                                    .~
fJ Operators have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue time constraints.  
: 5.         The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics.                                               ?       kt~
? ctt., Cues are given. S . The simulator modeling is not altered. , "'i:> 9. The scenarios have been validated.
                                                                                                                      ~ t::>
Pursuant to 10CFA55.46(d), any open simulator performance deficiencies or deviations from the referenced plant have been evaluated  
: 6.         Sequencing and timing of events is reasonable, and allows the examination team to obtain complete evaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives.                                                 ".~
? ,."., to ensure that functional fidelity Is maintained while running the planned scenarios.
: 7.         If time compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates.
: 10. Every operator will be evaluated using at least one new or significantly modified scenario.
Operators have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue time constraints.
1!-? -frJ All other scenarios have been altered in accordance with Section 0.5 of ES-301. 11. AU individual operator competenCies can be evaluated, as verified using Form ES-301-6 (submit the form along with the simulator scenarios). ? 1M" 12. Each applicant will be significantly involved in the minimum number of transients and events t". i) "'-'t1 specified on Form ES-301-5 (submit the form with the simulator scenarios).
Cues are given.                                                                                      fJ ? ctt.,
: 13. The level of difficulty is appropriate to support licensing decisions for each crew position. 'D "'-if Target Quantitativa Attributes (Per Scenario; See Section D.5.d) Actual Attributes  
S.         The simulator modeling is not altered.                                                                       "'i:>   M~
----. 1. Total malfunctions (5-S) S / 7 / 7 ? 2. Malfunctions after EOP entry (1-2) 2 I 1 / 1 ';:> 6uA 3. Abnormal evants (2-4) 4/2/3 # D M" 4. Major transients (1-2) 2 I 2 / 2 tJ? -V "'" 5. EOPs entered/requiring substantive actions (1-2) 1 / 2 / 1 'i:> NA 6. EOP contingencies requiring substantive actions (0-2) 1 I 1 I 1 I/( ;;;::> MIA 7. Critical tasks (2-3) 2 I 2 I 2 V .;>}}
                                                                                                                    ~
: 9.         The scenarios have been validated. Pursuant to 10CFA55.46(d), any open simulator performance deficiencies or deviations from the referenced plant have been evaluated to ensure that functional fidelity Is maintained while running the planned scenarios.                         ?      ,.".,
: 10.         Every operator will be evaluated using at least one new or significantly modified scenario.
All other scenarios have been altered in accordance with Section 0.5 of ES-301.                       1!- ?            -frJ
                                                                                                                    ~?
: 11.         AU individual operator competenCies can be evaluated, as verified using Form ES-301-6 (submit the form along with the simulator scenarios).
1M"
: 12.         Each applicant will be significantly involved in the minimum number of transients and events specified on Form ES-301-5 (submit the form with the simulator scenarios).                           t". i)
                                                                                                                                    "'-'t1
: 13.         The level of difficulty is appropriate to support licensing decisions for each crew position.         ~ 'D           "'-if Target Quantitativa Attributes (Per Scenario; See Section D.5.d)                     Actual Attributes   -       --     -.
: 1.         Total malfunctions (5-S)                                                               S/ 7 / 7         ~ ?           Il~
: 2.         Malfunctions after EOP entry (1-2)                                                     2 I 1 / 1     ~      ';:>     6uA
: 3.         Abnormal evants (2-4)                                                                 4/2/3           #       D M"
tJ?    -V
: 4.         Major transients (1-2)                                                                 2I 2 / 2
: 5.         EOPs entered/requiring substantive actions (1-2)                                       1 / 2 / 1     ~        'i:>
NA
: 6.         EOP contingencies requiring substantive actions (0-2)                                 1I 1I 1       I/(     ;;;::>
MIA
: 7.         Critical tasks (2-3)                                                                   2 I 2 I 2     V                 ~
ES-301, Page 25 of 27}}

Latest revision as of 21:38, 1 March 2020

2012 Dresden Nuclear Power Station Initial License Examination Simulator Quality Checklist ES-301-4
ML12291A700
Person / Time
Site: Dresden  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 08/06/2012
From: David Reeser
NRC/RGN-III/DRS/OLB
To:
Exelon Generation Co
Shared Package
ML11354A123 List:
References
Download: ML12291A700 (2)
v • d • e


Text

2012 DRESDEN NUCLEAR POWER STATION INITIAL EXAMINATION PROPOSED EXAM FILES

  • ES-301 Facility: Dresden Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist Date of Exam: S/6I12 Scenario Numbers: 1 12/3 QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES Form ES-301-4 Operating Test Number: 11-1 (2012-301)

Ini~ials a b* c#

1. The initial conditions are realistic, in that some equipment and/or Instrumentation may be out of service, but it does not cue the operators Into expected events. j' ~
2. The scenarios consist mostly of related events. ~ "i':)

M~

3. Each event description consists of
  • the point in the scenario when it is to be Initiated
  • the malfunction(s) that are entered to initiate the event
  • the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew
  1. -;::> nt~
  • the expected operator actions (by shift position)
  • the event termination point (if applicable)
4. No more than one non-mechanistic failure (e.g., pipe break) is incorporated Into the scenario without a credible preceding incident such as a seismic event.  ;:t ? IWtJ

.~

5. The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics.  ? kt~

~ t::>

6. Sequencing and timing of events is reasonable, and allows the examination team to obtain complete evaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives. ".~
7. If time compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates.

Operators have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue time constraints.

Cues are given. fJ ? ctt.,

S. The simulator modeling is not altered. "'i:> M~

~

9. The scenarios have been validated. Pursuant to 10CFA55.46(d), any open simulator performance deficiencies or deviations from the referenced plant have been evaluated to ensure that functional fidelity Is maintained while running the planned scenarios.  ? ,.".,
10. Every operator will be evaluated using at least one new or significantly modified scenario.

All other scenarios have been altered in accordance with Section 0.5 of ES-301. 1!- ? -frJ

~?

11. AU individual operator competenCies can be evaluated, as verified using Form ES-301-6 (submit the form along with the simulator scenarios).

1M"

12. Each applicant will be significantly involved in the minimum number of transients and events specified on Form ES-301-5 (submit the form with the simulator scenarios). t". i)

"'-'t1

13. The level of difficulty is appropriate to support licensing decisions for each crew position. ~ 'D "'-if Target Quantitativa Attributes (Per Scenario; See Section D.5.d) Actual Attributes - -- -.
1. Total malfunctions (5-S) S/ 7 / 7 ~ ? Il~
2. Malfunctions after EOP entry (1-2) 2 I 1 / 1 ~ ';:> 6uA
3. Abnormal evants (2-4) 4/2/3 # D M"

tJ? -V

4. Major transients (1-2) 2I 2 / 2
5. EOPs entered/requiring substantive actions (1-2) 1 / 2 / 1 ~ 'i:>

NA

6. EOP contingencies requiring substantive actions (0-2) 1I 1I 1 I/(  ;;;::>

MIA

7. Critical tasks (2-3) 2 I 2 I 2 V ~

ES-301, Page 25 of 27

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML12291A700&oldid=2521139"