ML12291A700

2012 Dresden Nuclear Power Station Initial License Examination Simulator Quality Checklist ES-301-4

ML12291A700
Person / Time
Site:	Dresden
Issue date:	08/06/2012
From:	David Reeser NRC/RGN-III/DRS/OLB
To:	Exelon Generation Co
Shared Package
ML11354A123	List: ML12284A346 ML12284A451 ML12284A455 ML12284A460 ML12284A463 ML12284A470 ML12284A480 ML12291A697 ML12291A698 ML12291A700 ML12291A701
References
Download: ML12291A700 (2)

Text

2012 DRESDEN NUCLEAR POWER STATION INITIAL EXAMINATION PROPOSED EXAM FILES

• ES-301 Facility: Dresden Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist Date of Exam: S/6I12 Scenario Numbers: 1 12/3 QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES Form ES-301-4 Operating Test Number: 11-1 (2012-301)

Ini~ials a b* c#

1. The initial conditions are realistic, in that some equipment and/or Instrumentation may be out of service, but it does not cue the operators Into expected events. j' ~

2. The scenarios consist mostly of related events. ~ "i':)

M~

3. Each event description consists of

• the point in the scenario when it is to be Initiated

• the malfunction(s) that are entered to initiate the event

• the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew

1. -;::> nt~

• the expected operator actions (by shift position)

• the event termination point (if applicable)

4. No more than one non-mechanistic failure (e.g., pipe break) is incorporated Into the scenario without a credible preceding incident such as a seismic event.  ;:t ? IWtJ

.~

5. The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics.  ? kt~

~ t::>

6. Sequencing and timing of events is reasonable, and allows the examination team to obtain complete evaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives. ".~

7. If time compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates.

Operators have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue time constraints.

Cues are given. fJ ? ctt.,

S. The simulator modeling is not altered. "'i:> M~

~

9. The scenarios have been validated. Pursuant to 10CFA55.46(d), any open simulator performance deficiencies or deviations from the referenced plant have been evaluated to ensure that functional fidelity Is maintained while running the planned scenarios.  ? ,.".,

10. Every operator will be evaluated using at least one new or significantly modified scenario.

All other scenarios have been altered in accordance with Section 0.5 of ES-301. 1!- ? -frJ

~?

11. AU individual operator competenCies can be evaluated, as verified using Form ES-301-6 (submit the form along with the simulator scenarios).

1M"

12. Each applicant will be significantly involved in the minimum number of transients and events specified on Form ES-301-5 (submit the form with the simulator scenarios). t". i)

"'-'t1

13. The level of difficulty is appropriate to support licensing decisions for each crew position. ~ 'D "'-if Target Quantitativa Attributes (Per Scenario; See Section D.5.d) Actual Attributes - -- -.

1. Total malfunctions (5-S) S/ 7 / 7 ~ ? Il~

2. Malfunctions after EOP entry (1-2) 2 I 1 / 1 ~ ';:> 6uA

3. Abnormal evants (2-4) 4/2/3 # D M"

tJ? -V

4. Major transients (1-2) 2I 2 / 2

5. EOPs entered/requiring substantive actions (1-2) 1 / 2 / 1 ~ 'i:>

NA

6. EOP contingencies requiring substantive actions (0-2) 1I 1I 1 I/(  ;;;::>

MIA

7. Critical tasks (2-3) 2 I 2 I 2 V ~

ES-301, Page 25 of 27