ML14044A027: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(5 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
| issue date = 10/21/2013
| issue date = 10/21/2013
| title = 2013 Dresden Nuclear Power Station Initial License Examination Outline Submittal
| title = 2013 Dresden Nuclear Power Station Initial License Examination Outline Submittal
| author name = Walton R K
| author name = Walton R
| author affiliation = NRC/RGN-III/DRS/OLB
| author affiliation = NRC/RGN-III/DRS/OLB
| addressee name =  
| addressee name =  
Line 14: Line 14:
| page count = 5
| page count = 5
}}
}}
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:2013 DRESDEN NUCLEAR POWER STATION INITIAL LICENSE EXAMINATION OUTLINE SUBMITTAL
ES-201                                          Examination Outline Quality Checklist                                  Form ES-201-2 Facility:                                                                                        Date of Examination:
Initials Item                                                          Task Description a        b*      c#
1.
w
: a. Verify that the outiine(s) fit(s) the appropriate model, in accordance with ES-401 or ES-401 N.
                                                                                                                          ~        fJ~    R\fvJ R        b. Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with T
I          Section D.1 of ES-401 or ES-401 N and whether all KIA categories are appropriately sampled.            ~        tt\4 R~\.l T
E
: c. Assess whether the outline over-emphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics.                ~ t.Jifr          ~\(\J N
: d. Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected KIA statements are appropriate.                    tJ\A R\{\d
: 2.        a. Using Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number of              """'      N\~
normal evolutions, instrument and component failures, technical specifications, and major
                                                                                                                          ~                R~W s            transients.
I M        b. Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number and u            mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule                        ~~A    g~\J without compromising exam integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested using at L
A            least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated from the            ~
T            applicants' audit test(s), and that scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days.
0 R
: c. To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conform(s) with the qualitative and quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D.
                                                                                                                        ~        ~\A      RK\J
: 3.        a. Verify that the systems walk-through outline meets the criteria specified on Fonm ES-301-2:
(1) the outline(s) contain(s) the required number of control room and in-plant tasks distributed w                  among the safety functions as specified on the fonm
                                                                                                                                          ~Y\1 A            (2) task repetition from the last two NRC examinations is within the limits specified on the fonm                ~\i L            (3) no tasks are duplicated from the applicants' audit test(s)                                          ~
K            (4) the number of new or modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specified on the fonm (5) the number of alternate path, low-power, emergency, and RCA tasks meet the criteria on T                  the form.
H R        b. Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-1:
0            (1) the tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the fonm J.w.    ~v.. i<V\J u            (2) at least one task is new or significantly modified G            (3) no more than one task is repeated from the last two NRC licensing examinations H                                                                                                                                            '
: c. Determine if there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix of applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subsequent days.                                  ~ rv\~ ~\J
: 4.        a. Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including PRA and IPE insights) are covered in the appropriate exam sections.                                                                            ~          t.~\A    W\J G
E N
: b. Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41/43 and 55.45 sampling is appropriate.                                  rNA      ~'\A  w:w E
: c. Ensure that KIA importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5.            1..      rv\A fN..w R
A
: d. Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections.                                                  ~ 111\A ~\.t}
L        e. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage.                                                          J,\\\    N\A @(\J
: f. Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level (RO or SRO).                                    ~ N\A P)(lJ
: a. Author                                  Jtat2. MeJJ:.ttr~d                                                                  .Nft~ZZQI,
: b. Facility Reviewer(*)                      .d/1#              7                  /)                                          AI/A
: c. NRC Chief Examiner (#)                  ~Ot>JO          'lbt11A W!tiA~IK~Y.~1. Jb-                                        zh!zolf
                                                            ..,._ .L J~&J*Ht:o**                    ~.\  .....~.-L~    ":'f/L ::"\
: d. NRC Supervisor I                  /            lY            "                .:&#xa2;;p-&#xa5; Note:                    #Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence required.
                          *Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination outlines.
ES-201, Page 26 of 28
Scenario Outline Station:  Dresden Generating Station              Scenario No.:    ILT-N-1      Class ID: 2013-301 Evaluators                                          Operators              I crew position I ATC I BOP I CRS Initial Conditions:    -5% Power, steadl&#xa3; state, and eguilibrium xenon Turnover:                2C RFP OOS Event            Malt.              Event                                        Event No.              No.              Type*                                      Description N      BOP      Establish Primary Containment lnerting Lineup Per DOP 1            NONE                                1600-05 2            NONE              R      ATC      Withdraw Rods To Open Turbine Bypass Valves 3        RODH08DO          CIT      ATC      Control Rod Drifts Out (TS) 4          NIA5POT          liT      BOP      APRM Fails Upscale Without Half Scram (TS) 5          X10/X13            c      ATC      RFP Vent Fan- Trips Due To Overcurrent 6            HPINIT          1/T      BOP      HPCI System Spurious Initiation (TS) 7            F41            M      TEAM      LOCA In DW- Manual Scram 8            H32              c      TEAM      Loss Of RFPs- Use HPCI To Restore Level
* (N)ormal, (R)eact1v1ty, (l)nstrument, (C)omponent, (M)aJor, (T)ech Spec SCENARIO ILT-N-1                                      Page 2 of 28                                  Rev. 00 (08/13)
Scenario Outline Station:  Dresden Generating Station                Scenario No.:      ILT-N-2      Class ID: 2013-301 Evaluators                                              Operators              I crew position I ATC I BOP I CRS Initial Conditions:      100% Power1 steadl&#xa3; state 1 and eguilibrium xenon Turnover:                At beginning of shift1 ~erform Core  S~ral&#xa3; Test Dro~ ~ower using control rods Event            Mal f.              Event                                          Event No.              No.                Type*                                        Description CORE SPRAY TEST per DOS 1400-05 with Min Flow Auto-1            AT17            CIT      BOP close Failure (TS) 2            NONE              R        ATC      Lower Power Using Control Rods 3          RODD08ST            c        ATC      CRD- Control Rod Stuck & Requires Higher Pressure to Move 4            NONE              T        SRO      Torus Level PAM Instrument Not Qualified per IMD (TS) 5          Q31 I Q21            c        BOP      Service Water Pump Degradation 6      RLMRFPA(B)(C)            I        ATC      FW- Recirc Runback Due to Loss of FW Signal RXMLGOSC I 7                              M        ALL      Manual Scram REQUIRED - Due to Reactor Core Instabilities A 55 RDHLVFPA(B) I 8                              MIC        ALL      Failure to Scram (SBLC successful)
RDHLDEGA(B)
* (N)ormal, (R)eactlvlty, (l)nstrument, (C)omponent, (M)aJor, (T)ech Spec SCENARIO ILT-N-2                                        Page 2 of28                                    Rev. 00 (08113)
Scenario Outline Station:  Dresden Generating Station                Scenario No.:    ILT-N-3      Class ID: 2013-301 Evaluators                                            Operators            I crew position I ATC I BOP I CRS Initial Conditions:      88% Power,  stead~ state, and eguilibrium xenon Turnover:                Scheduled load droe at beginning of shift Surveillance DOS 0500-01 Manual Scram Circuit Sensor Test due Event            Malf.                Event                                        Event No.              No.                Type*                                      Description 1            NONE              R        ATC      Lower Power with Recirc 2        MGDDBATR              c        BOP      Generator Bus Duct Blower Trip 3            NONE              N        ATC      Perform Manual Scram Circuit Sensor Test on RPS Channel B 4          ICTUBLK            liT      BOP      Isolation Condenser Tube Leak (TS) 5              B02            CIT        ATC      RPS - MG Set Trips I Re-energize from Reserve Power (TS) 6              B02                I      ATC      Recirc MG Set Vent Fan Failure 7          T50 I T52            M        ALL      Loss of Stator Cooling I Manual Scram AT5 NVM100BP FLOODING- Loss of RPV Level Indication Due to Loss of lnst 8          NVML29AP              M        ALL Power and Transmitter Failures NVML29BP NVML 112P
* (N)ormal, (R)eact1v1ty, (l)nstrument, (C)omponent, (M)aJor, (T)ech Spec SCENARIO ILT-N-3                                        Page 2 of26                                  Rev. 00 (08113)}}

Latest revision as of 23:14, 5 February 2020

2013 Dresden Nuclear Power Station Initial License Examination Outline Submittal
ML14044A027
Person / Time
Site: Dresden  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 10/21/2013
From: Walton R
NRC/RGN-III/DRS/OLB
To:
Exelon Generation Co
Shared Package
ML11355A021 List:
References
Download: ML14044A027 (5)


Text

2013 DRESDEN NUCLEAR POWER STATION INITIAL LICENSE EXAMINATION OUTLINE SUBMITTAL

ES-201 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2 Facility: Date of Examination:

Initials Item Task Description a b* c#

1.

w

a. Verify that the outiine(s) fit(s) the appropriate model, in accordance with ES-401 or ES-401 N.

~ fJ~ R\fvJ R b. Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with T

I Section D.1 of ES-401 or ES-401 N and whether all KIA categories are appropriately sampled. ~ tt\4 R~\.l T

E

c. Assess whether the outline over-emphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics. ~ t.Jifr ~\(\J N
d. Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected KIA statements are appropriate. tJ\A R\{\d
2. a. Using Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number of """' N\~

normal evolutions, instrument and component failures, technical specifications, and major

~ R~W s transients.

I M b. Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number and u mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule ~~A g~\J without compromising exam integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested using at L

A least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated from the ~

T applicants' audit test(s), and that scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days.

0 R

c. To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conform(s) with the qualitative and quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D.

~ ~\A RK\J

3. a. Verify that the systems walk-through outline meets the criteria specified on Fonm ES-301-2:

(1) the outline(s) contain(s) the required number of control room and in-plant tasks distributed w among the safety functions as specified on the fonm

~Y\1 A (2) task repetition from the last two NRC examinations is within the limits specified on the fonm ~\i L (3) no tasks are duplicated from the applicants' audit test(s) ~

K (4) the number of new or modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specified on the fonm (5) the number of alternate path, low-power, emergency, and RCA tasks meet the criteria on T the form.

H R b. Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-1:

0 (1) the tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the fonm J.w. ~v.. i<V\J u (2) at least one task is new or significantly modified G (3) no more than one task is repeated from the last two NRC licensing examinations H '

c. Determine if there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix of applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subsequent days. ~ rv\~ ~\J
4. a. Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including PRA and IPE insights) are covered in the appropriate exam sections. ~ t.~\A W\J G

E N

b. Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41/43 and 55.45 sampling is appropriate. rNA ~'\A w:w E
c. Ensure that KIA importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5. 1.. rv\A fN..w R

A

d. Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections. ~ 111\A ~\.t}

L e. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage. J,\\\ N\A @(\J

f. Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level (RO or SRO). ~ N\A P)(lJ
a. Author Jtat2. MeJJ:.ttr~d .Nft~ZZQI,
b. Facility Reviewer(*) .d/1# 7 /) AI/A
c. NRC Chief Examiner (#) ~Ot>JO 'lbt11A W!tiA~IK~Y.~1. Jb- zh!zolf

..,._ .L J~&J*Ht:o** ~.\ .....~.-L~ ":'f/L ::"\

d. NRC Supervisor I / lY " .:¢;p-¥ Note: #Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence required.
  • Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination outlines.

ES-201, Page 26 of 28

Scenario Outline Station: Dresden Generating Station Scenario No.: ILT-N-1 Class ID: 2013-301 Evaluators Operators I crew position I ATC I BOP I CRS Initial Conditions: -5% Power, steadl£ state, and eguilibrium xenon Turnover: 2C RFP OOS Event Malt. Event Event No. No. Type* Description N BOP Establish Primary Containment lnerting Lineup Per DOP 1 NONE 1600-05 2 NONE R ATC Withdraw Rods To Open Turbine Bypass Valves 3 RODH08DO CIT ATC Control Rod Drifts Out (TS) 4 NIA5POT liT BOP APRM Fails Upscale Without Half Scram (TS) 5 X10/X13 c ATC RFP Vent Fan- Trips Due To Overcurrent 6 HPINIT 1/T BOP HPCI System Spurious Initiation (TS) 7 F41 M TEAM LOCA In DW- Manual Scram 8 H32 c TEAM Loss Of RFPs- Use HPCI To Restore Level

  • (N)ormal, (R)eact1v1ty, (l)nstrument, (C)omponent, (M)aJor, (T)ech Spec SCENARIO ILT-N-1 Page 2 of 28 Rev. 00 (08/13)

Scenario Outline Station: Dresden Generating Station Scenario No.: ILT-N-2 Class ID: 2013-301 Evaluators Operators I crew position I ATC I BOP I CRS Initial Conditions: 100% Power1 steadl£ state 1 and eguilibrium xenon Turnover: At beginning of shift1 ~erform Core S~ral£ Test Dro~ ~ower using control rods Event Mal f. Event Event No. No. Type* Description CORE SPRAY TEST per DOS 1400-05 with Min Flow Auto-1 AT17 CIT BOP close Failure (TS) 2 NONE R ATC Lower Power Using Control Rods 3 RODD08ST c ATC CRD- Control Rod Stuck & Requires Higher Pressure to Move 4 NONE T SRO Torus Level PAM Instrument Not Qualified per IMD (TS) 5 Q31 I Q21 c BOP Service Water Pump Degradation 6 RLMRFPA(B)(C) I ATC FW- Recirc Runback Due to Loss of FW Signal RXMLGOSC I 7 M ALL Manual Scram REQUIRED - Due to Reactor Core Instabilities A 55 RDHLVFPA(B) I 8 MIC ALL Failure to Scram (SBLC successful)

RDHLDEGA(B)

  • (N)ormal, (R)eactlvlty, (l)nstrument, (C)omponent, (M)aJor, (T)ech Spec SCENARIO ILT-N-2 Page 2 of28 Rev. 00 (08113)

Scenario Outline Station: Dresden Generating Station Scenario No.: ILT-N-3 Class ID: 2013-301 Evaluators Operators I crew position I ATC I BOP I CRS Initial Conditions: 88% Power, stead~ state, and eguilibrium xenon Turnover: Scheduled load droe at beginning of shift Surveillance DOS 0500-01 Manual Scram Circuit Sensor Test due Event Malf. Event Event No. No. Type* Description 1 NONE R ATC Lower Power with Recirc 2 MGDDBATR c BOP Generator Bus Duct Blower Trip 3 NONE N ATC Perform Manual Scram Circuit Sensor Test on RPS Channel B 4 ICTUBLK liT BOP Isolation Condenser Tube Leak (TS) 5 B02 CIT ATC RPS - MG Set Trips I Re-energize from Reserve Power (TS) 6 B02 I ATC Recirc MG Set Vent Fan Failure 7 T50 I T52 M ALL Loss of Stator Cooling I Manual Scram AT5 NVM100BP FLOODING- Loss of RPV Level Indication Due to Loss of lnst 8 NVML29AP M ALL Power and Transmitter Failures NVML29BP NVML 112P

  • (N)ormal, (R)eact1v1ty, (l)nstrument, (C)omponent, (M)aJor, (T)ech Spec SCENARIO ILT-N-3 Page 2 of26 Rev. 00 (08113)