ML14247A248: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| issue date = 06/13/2014 | | issue date = 06/13/2014 | ||
| title = 2014 Byron Nuclear Station Initial License Examination Form ES-301-3 | | title = 2014 Byron Nuclear Station Initial License Examination Form ES-301-3 | ||
| author name = Walton R | | author name = Walton R | ||
| author affiliation = NRC/RGN-III/DRS/OLB | | author affiliation = NRC/RGN-III/DRS/OLB | ||
| addressee name = | | addressee name = | ||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:ES-301 Operating Test Quality Checklist Form ES-301-3 Facility: | {{#Wiki_filter:ES-301 Operating Test Quality Checklist Form ES-301-3 Facility: &.JV"- Date of Examination: "/t/~'1'Operating Tesfffu~~t:(b:¥~ | ||
&.JV"-Date of Examination: | 0 Initials | ||
: 1. General Criteria a b* c# | |||
: 1. General Criteria a b* c# a. The operating test conforms with the previously approved outline; changes are consistent with | : a. The operating test conforms with the previously approved outline; changes are consistent with sampling requirements (e.g., 10 CFR 55.45, operational importance, safety function distribution). | ||
: b. There is no day-to-day repetition between this and other operating tests to be administered Jt-£\AW | 5/1P J7c- ~~ | ||
: c. The operating test shall not duplicate items from the applicants' audit test(s). | : b. There is no day-to-day repetition between this and other operating tests to be administered during this examination. | ||
(see Section D.1.a.) 1111' d. Overlap with the written examination and between different parts of the operating test is within acceptable limits. rl:NJ Q1-e. It appears that the operating test will differentiate between competent and less-than-competent tfl:HJ 6t--applicants at the designated license level. 2. Walk-Through Criteria ------a. Each JPM includes the following, as applicable: | ~ Jt- £\AW | ||
* initial conditions | : c. The operating test shall not duplicate items from the applicants' audit test(s). (see Section D.1.a.) 1111' ~ ~~ | ||
: d. Overlap with the written examination and between different parts of the operating test is within acceptable limits. | |||
* references and tools, including associated procedures | rl:NJ Q1- ~ | ||
* reasonable and validated time limits (average time allowed for completion) and specific | : e. It appears that the operating test will differentiate between competent and less-than-competent tfl:HJ 6t-- ~w applicants at the designated license level. | ||
* operationally important specific performance criteria that include: | : 2. Walk-Through Criteria -- -- -- | ||
-detailed expected actions with exact criteria and nomenclature | : a. Each JPM includes the following, as applicable: | ||
-system response and other examiner cues -statements describing important observations to be made by the applicant | * initial conditions initiating cues | ||
-criteria for successful completion of the task -identification of critical steps and their associated performance standards | * references and tools, including associated procedures | ||
-restrictions on the sequence of steps, if applicable | * reasonable and validated time limits (average time allowed for completion) and specific designation if deemed to be time-critical by the facility licensee t1fl It- (MtJ | ||
: b. Ensure that any changes from the previously approved systems and administrative walk-through | * operationally important specific performance criteria that include: | ||
- detailed expected actions with exact criteria and nomenclature | |||
: 3. Simulator Criteria | - system response and other examiner cues | ||
------The associated simulator operating tests (scenario sets) have been reviewed in accordance with 124' Form ES-301-4 and a copy is attached. | - statements describing important observations to be made by the applicant | ||
- criteria for successful completion of the task | |||
'I/J7//Y J b. Facility Reviewer(*) | - identification of critical steps and their associated performance standards | ||
S/Z(I'.N | - restrictions on the sequence of steps, if applicable | ||
: c. NRC Chief B<amloe' | : b. Ensure that any changes from the previously approved systems and administrative walk-through outlines (Forms ES-301-1 and 2) have not caused the test to deviate from any of the acceptance criteria (e.g., item distribution, bank use, repetition from the last 2 NRC examinations) specified | ||
(#) lli.c"i4 j) M / J.'J)J;r.. | '# ~ | ||
~\,;) | |||
on those forms and Form ES-201-2. | |||
'/nt/{I)F/ | : 3. Simulator Criteria -- -- -- | ||
ft. >r5/1Y | The associated simulator operating tests (scenario sets) have been reviewed in accordance with 124' ~~ | ||
* The facility signature is not applicable for NRC-developed tests. # Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence required.}} | Form ES-301-4 and a copy is attached. | ||
Printed Nam~~ature ~ | |||
Date | |||
: a. Author ~/3cfJqf VE"f"C2.Sc.N j[K".r£;-~ ~...------ 'I/J7//Y J | |||
: b. Facility Reviewer(*) S/Z(I'.N LE--*AJ/~ r~Jr | |||
: c. NRC Chief B<amloe' (#) ~I) lli.c"i4 ~!,:fAy</~' j) M / J.'J)J;r.. ~;;; | |||
: d. NRC Supervisor If* . | |||
'/nt/{I)F/ ft. ~>r5/1Y .~/:::.. | |||
/, y v | |||
-~ SJ J ~/. | |||
NOTE: | |||
* The facility signature is not applicable for NRC-developed tests. | |||
# Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence required.}} | |||
Latest revision as of 18:51, 5 February 2020
| ML14247A248 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Byron  |
| Issue date: | 06/13/2014 |
| From: | Walton R NRC/RGN-III/DRS/OLB |
| To: | Exelon Generation Co |
| Shared Package | |
| ML14140A562 | List: |
| References | |
| Download: ML14247A248 (1) | |
Text
ES-301 Operating Test Quality Checklist Form ES-301-3 Facility: &.JV"- Date of Examination: "/t/~'1'Operating Tesfffu~~t:(b:¥~
0 Initials
- 1. General Criteria a b* c#
- a. The operating test conforms with the previously approved outline; changes are consistent with sampling requirements (e.g., 10 CFR 55.45, operational importance, safety function distribution).
5/1P J7c- ~~
- b. There is no day-to-day repetition between this and other operating tests to be administered during this examination.
~ Jt- £\AW
- c. The operating test shall not duplicate items from the applicants' audit test(s). (see Section D.1.a.) 1111' ~ ~~
- d. Overlap with the written examination and between different parts of the operating test is within acceptable limits.
rl:NJ Q1- ~
- e. It appears that the operating test will differentiate between competent and less-than-competent tfl:HJ 6t-- ~w applicants at the designated license level.
- 2. Walk-Through Criteria -- -- --
- a. Each JPM includes the following, as applicable:
- initial conditions initiating cues
- references and tools, including associated procedures
- reasonable and validated time limits (average time allowed for completion) and specific designation if deemed to be time-critical by the facility licensee t1fl It- (MtJ
- operationally important specific performance criteria that include:
- detailed expected actions with exact criteria and nomenclature
- system response and other examiner cues
- statements describing important observations to be made by the applicant
- criteria for successful completion of the task
- identification of critical steps and their associated performance standards
- restrictions on the sequence of steps, if applicable
- b. Ensure that any changes from the previously approved systems and administrative walk-through outlines (Forms ES-301-1 and 2) have not caused the test to deviate from any of the acceptance criteria (e.g., item distribution, bank use, repetition from the last 2 NRC examinations) specified
'# ~
~\,;)
on those forms and Form ES-201-2.
- 3. Simulator Criteria -- -- --
The associated simulator operating tests (scenario sets) have been reviewed in accordance with 124' ~~
Form ES-301-4 and a copy is attached.
Printed Nam~~ature ~
Date
- a. Author ~/3cfJqf VE"f"C2.Sc.N j[K".r£;-~ ~...------ 'I/J7//Y J
- b. Facility Reviewer(*) S/Z(I'.N LE--*AJ/~ r~Jr
- c. NRC Chief B<amloe' (#) ~I) lli.c"i4 ~!,:fAy</~' j) M / J.'J)J;r.. ~;;;
- d. NRC Supervisor If* .
'/nt/{I)F/ ft. ~>r5/1Y .~/:::..
/, y v
-~ SJ J ~/.
NOTE:
- The facility signature is not applicable for NRC-developed tests.
- Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence required.