ML17037C462: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(7 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
| number = ML17037C462
| number = ML17037C462
| issue date = 02/15/1974
| issue date = 02/15/1974
| title = Nine Mile Point Nuclear Power Station, Unit 1 - Letter Transmitting Proposed Changes to Technical Specifications for the Maintenance of Pressure Suppression Chamber Integrity
| title = Letter Transmitting Proposed Changes to Technical Specifications for the Maintenance of Pressure Suppression Chamber Integrity
| author name = Raymond P D
| author name = Raymond P
| author affiliation = Niagara Mohawk Power Corp
| author affiliation = Niagara Mohawk Power Corp
| addressee name = Ziemann D L
| addressee name = Ziemann D
| addressee affiliation = US Atomic Energy Commission (AEC)
| addressee affiliation = US Atomic Energy Commission (AEC)
| docket = 05000220
| docket = 05000220
Line 13: Line 13:
| page count = 8
| page count = 8
}}
}}
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:AEC DIS  "BUTION FOR PART 50 DOCKET MATE (TEMPORARY FORM)                              CONSOL NO:
FILE:
FROM:                                    DATE OF DOC      DATE REC'D            LTR    MEMO            OTHER Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation Syracuse, N.Y. 13202 Philip    D. Raymond                            2<<15-74        2-20-74 To:                                          ORIG          CC    OTHER                SENT AEC PDR SENT LOCAL PDR      XXX D.L. Ziemann                                    1  signed CLASS      UNCLASS        PROP INFO          XNPUT        NO C S    'REC'D            DOCKET NO:
XXX            40                  50-220 DESCRXPTION:                                              ENCLOSURES:
Ltr re our      12-19-73  ltr...trans  the  following...            Proposed      changes  to tech specs.
ACKNOW,ED"ED (40 cys encl    rec'd)
PLANT NAME:      Nine Mile Point 81                                          DO NOT REMOVE FOR ACTION/XNFORtiATION                        2  20-74      JB BUTLER(L)            SCHWENCER(L)          ~ZIEMANN(L)                REGAN(E)
W/ Copies            W/    Copies            W/P Copies              W/ Copies CLARK(L)            STOLZ(L)                DICKER(E)
W/ Copies            W/ Copies                W/ Copies                W/    Copies
  'W/
GOLLER(L)
Copies KNIEL(L)
                          '/
VASSALLO(L)
Copies SCHEMEL  (L)
KNIGHTON(E)
W/ Copies YOUNGBLOOD(E)
W/    Copies W/ Copies            W/    Copies            W/  Copies          ~
W/    Copies INTERNAL DISTRI BUTXON REG                      TECH REVIEW          DENTON                                        A/I IND AEC PDR                  HENDRIE              GRIMES          LIC ASST                      BRAIDCIN
  <  OGC, ROON    P-506A      SCHROEDER            GAMNILL        ~DIGGS      (L)                SALTZMAN
  >MUNTZING/STAFF            MACCARY              KASTNER          GEARIN (L)                  B. HURT CASE                    KNIGHT              BALLARD          GOULBOURNE      (L)        PLANS GIAMBUSSO                PAWLICKX            SPANGLER          LEE (L)
MCDONALD BOYD                    SHAO                                  MAIGRET      (L)          ~UBE w/Input MOORE (L) (BWR)          S TELLO              ENVIRO            SERVICE      (L)
DEYOUNG (L) (PWR)        HOUSTON              MULLER            SHEPPARD      (E)            INFO I/SKOVHOLT (L)              NOVAK                DICKER            SMITH    (L)                C. MILES P. COLLINS              ROSS                KNIGHTON          TEETS    (L)                B. KING DENXSE                  XPPOLXTO            YOUNGBLOOD      WADE      (E)            Wi'A". Cab'ell
  ~BEG OPR                    TEDESCO              REGAN            WILLIAMS (E)
PILE A REGION(Q}        LONG                PROJECT LDR      WILSON      (L)
MORRIS                  LAINAS                                S, REED (L)
STEELE                  BENAROYA            HARLESS VOLLMER EXTERNAL DISTRIBUTION W -    LOCAL PDR Oswe o      /N.Y,.
        "  DTXE(ABERNATHY)                  (1) (2)(10)-NATIONAL LAB'                          1-PDR-SAN/LA/NY
        -  NSIC(BUCHANAN)                              1-ASLBP(E/W Bldg,Rm 529)                1-GERALD LELLOUCHE 1 -  ASLB(YORE/SAYRE/                            1-.W. PENNINGTON, Rm E>>201 GT          BROOKHAVEN NAT. LAB WOODARD/"H" ST.                              1-CONSULTANT'S                          1"AGMED(Ruth Gussmap) 4  16  -  CYS ACRS HE6RR% Sent      to Digg              NEWMARK/BLUME/AGBABIAN                  HM" B-127, GT.
At 1-GERALD ULRIKSON...ORNL                1-RD..MULLER.,F-309  GT 2-20-74
              ~ ~
                  ~ ~
~ ~ ~
r ~ ~ ~
                            ~"-~<<~a~I'F                P%
MOHAWK POWER CORPORATION          ay'IAGARA
                                          .,4FIIIII; NIAGARA    I          MOHAWK 300 ERIE BOULEVARD WEST SYRACUSE, N. Y. 13202 February 15, 1974                        QO cps ZS
~
Mr. Dennis L. Ziemann Chief, Operating Reactors Branch 82 Directorate of Licensing United States Atomic Energy Commission Washington, D. C. 20545 o
==Dear Mr. Ziemann:==
Re:    Nine Mile Point Unit 1                                          F I
Docket No. 50-220 In response to your letter of December 19, 1973, a proposed Technical Specification for the maintenance of pressure suppression chamber integrity at Nine Mile Point Unit 1 is attached.                            This Speci-fication includes a Limiting Condition for Operation, a Surveillance Requirement,  and Bases.
We have been advised that the general subject of containment surveillance has been placed    on the agenda of the Subcommittee for Metal Containment, Subsection NE, Section                    III,        ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Accordingly, the attached Specification should be con-sidered an interim requirement which may be amended to reflect applicable ASME Code requirements          if      and when they are formulated.
Very      truly yours, Philip            D.      ond Vice Presi ent              Engineering CVM/sj z Attachment CA 4'OP    Pg<>~lp Oc          '+Z@e                  O,
0 'v
~ t."4  g'
  ".2  ~g>>  gJ,
l 1
c
,3.3.8    Pres sure', Supp  ss i on Chamber  I nteg r i ty Applies to the overall integrity of the pressure suppression chamber.
~Ob e'ctive:
To  assure that the pressure suppression chamber is capable of limiting radiation exposure to the public to the values specified in 10 CFR 100, and to monitor the dynamic effects on the pressure suppression chamber of relief valve blowdowns into the chamber water.
b
    'if'henever the reactor coolant system temperature is above 215 F, the pressure suppression chamber integrity shall be maintained and chamber wall thickness shall be greater than 0.420 inches.
4.3.8    Pressure    Suppression  Chamber  Integrity Applies to the periodic inspection of the pressure suppression          system.
~ob ective:
To  assure that the pressure    suppression    chamber integrity is within the specified limits.
: a. Once each    operating cycle during the major refueling outage, five (5)  preselected  areas of the suppression chamber, wall shall be ultrasonically examined for section thickness.
: b. A  visual inspection of the suppression chamber interior, including water line regions and supports shall be made at each major refueling outage.
BASES The  values specified for minimum wall thickness of the pressure suppression chamber have been established based upon the design of the pressure suppression chamber in conformance with Section III, Class B of the ASME Code., The design specification allows a I/16 inch corrosion allowance to the unpainted interior surface of the chamber. Thus with a design thickness of 0.3975 inch the corrosion allowance increases the thickness to 0.460 inch. How-ever, manufacturing increases the thickness to a,nominal 0.500 inch allowing 0.1025 inch greater than design. The limit of 0.420 inch provides a maigin over the design thickness and assures suppression chamber integrity.
f 1l
BASES, Continued The  inspection frequency as established is conservative based on the observed change in thickness as determined from 1972 measure-ments to 1973 measurements in which there was no perceptible change after more than 20 individual relief valve operations.
To  determine the status of the pressure suppression system, a visual inspection of the suppression chamber interior surFaces and structure, with water at its normal elevation, will be made at each major refueling outage. This inspection will assure that any gross defects are detected.
A 1
k'
    'l I~}}

Latest revision as of 19:54, 4 February 2020

Letter Transmitting Proposed Changes to Technical Specifications for the Maintenance of Pressure Suppression Chamber Integrity
ML17037C462
Person / Time
Site: Nine Mile Point Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 02/15/1974
From: Raymond P
Niagara Mohawk Power Corp
To: Ziemann D
US Atomic Energy Commission (AEC)
References
Download: ML17037C462 (8)


Text

AEC DIS "BUTION FOR PART 50 DOCKET MATE (TEMPORARY FORM) CONSOL NO:

FILE:

FROM: DATE OF DOC DATE REC'D LTR MEMO OTHER Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation Syracuse, N.Y. 13202 Philip D. Raymond 2<<15-74 2-20-74 To: ORIG CC OTHER SENT AEC PDR SENT LOCAL PDR XXX D.L. Ziemann 1 signed CLASS UNCLASS PROP INFO XNPUT NO C S 'REC'D DOCKET NO:

XXX 40 50-220 DESCRXPTION: ENCLOSURES:

Ltr re our 12-19-73 ltr...trans the following... Proposed changes to tech specs.

ACKNOW,ED"ED (40 cys encl rec'd)

PLANT NAME: Nine Mile Point 81 DO NOT REMOVE FOR ACTION/XNFORtiATION 2 20-74 JB BUTLER(L) SCHWENCER(L) ~ZIEMANN(L) REGAN(E)

W/ Copies W/ Copies W/P Copies W/ Copies CLARK(L) STOLZ(L) DICKER(E)

W/ Copies W/ Copies W/ Copies W/ Copies

'W/

GOLLER(L)

Copies KNIEL(L)

'/

VASSALLO(L)

Copies SCHEMEL (L)

KNIGHTON(E)

W/ Copies YOUNGBLOOD(E)

W/ Copies W/ Copies W/ Copies W/ Copies ~

W/ Copies INTERNAL DISTRI BUTXON REG TECH REVIEW DENTON A/I IND AEC PDR HENDRIE GRIMES LIC ASST BRAIDCIN

< OGC, ROON P-506A SCHROEDER GAMNILL ~DIGGS (L) SALTZMAN

>MUNTZING/STAFF MACCARY KASTNER GEARIN (L) B. HURT CASE KNIGHT BALLARD GOULBOURNE (L) PLANS GIAMBUSSO PAWLICKX SPANGLER LEE (L)

MCDONALD BOYD SHAO MAIGRET (L) ~UBE w/Input MOORE (L) (BWR) S TELLO ENVIRO SERVICE (L)

DEYOUNG (L) (PWR) HOUSTON MULLER SHEPPARD (E) INFO I/SKOVHOLT (L) NOVAK DICKER SMITH (L) C. MILES P. COLLINS ROSS KNIGHTON TEETS (L) B. KING DENXSE XPPOLXTO YOUNGBLOOD WADE (E) Wi'A". Cab'ell

~BEG OPR TEDESCO REGAN WILLIAMS (E)

PILE A REGION(Q} LONG PROJECT LDR WILSON (L)

MORRIS LAINAS S, REED (L)

STEELE BENAROYA HARLESS VOLLMER EXTERNAL DISTRIBUTION W - LOCAL PDR Oswe o /N.Y,.

" DTXE(ABERNATHY) (1) (2)(10)-NATIONAL LAB' 1-PDR-SAN/LA/NY

- NSIC(BUCHANAN) 1-ASLBP(E/W Bldg,Rm 529) 1-GERALD LELLOUCHE 1 - ASLB(YORE/SAYRE/ 1-.W. PENNINGTON, Rm E>>201 GT BROOKHAVEN NAT. LAB WOODARD/"H" ST. 1-CONSULTANT'S 1"AGMED(Ruth Gussmap) 4 16 - CYS ACRS HE6RR% Sent to Digg NEWMARK/BLUME/AGBABIAN HM" B-127, GT.

At 1-GERALD ULRIKSON...ORNL 1-RD..MULLER.,F-309 GT 2-20-74

~ ~

~ ~

~ ~ ~

r ~ ~ ~

~"-~<<~a~I'F P%

MOHAWK POWER CORPORATION ay'IAGARA

.,4FIIIII; NIAGARA I MOHAWK 300 ERIE BOULEVARD WEST SYRACUSE, N. Y. 13202 February 15, 1974 QO cps ZS

~

Mr. Dennis L. Ziemann Chief, Operating Reactors Branch 82 Directorate of Licensing United States Atomic Energy Commission Washington, D. C. 20545 o

Dear Mr. Ziemann:

Re: Nine Mile Point Unit 1 F I

Docket No. 50-220 In response to your letter of December 19, 1973, a proposed Technical Specification for the maintenance of pressure suppression chamber integrity at Nine Mile Point Unit 1 is attached. This Speci-fication includes a Limiting Condition for Operation, a Surveillance Requirement, and Bases.

We have been advised that the general subject of containment surveillance has been placed on the agenda of the Subcommittee for Metal Containment, Subsection NE, Section III, ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Accordingly, the attached Specification should be con-sidered an interim requirement which may be amended to reflect applicable ASME Code requirements if and when they are formulated.

Very truly yours, Philip D. ond Vice Presi ent Engineering CVM/sj z Attachment CA 4'OP Pg<>~lp Oc '+Z@e O,

0 'v

~ t."4 g'

".2 ~g>> gJ,

l 1

c

,3.3.8 Pres sure', Supp ss i on Chamber I nteg r i ty Applies to the overall integrity of the pressure suppression chamber.

~Ob e'ctive:

To assure that the pressure suppression chamber is capable of limiting radiation exposure to the public to the values specified in 10 CFR 100, and to monitor the dynamic effects on the pressure suppression chamber of relief valve blowdowns into the chamber water.

b

'if'henever the reactor coolant system temperature is above 215 F, the pressure suppression chamber integrity shall be maintained and chamber wall thickness shall be greater than 0.420 inches.

4.3.8 Pressure Suppression Chamber Integrity Applies to the periodic inspection of the pressure suppression system.

~ob ective:

To assure that the pressure suppression chamber integrity is within the specified limits.

a. Once each operating cycle during the major refueling outage, five (5) preselected areas of the suppression chamber, wall shall be ultrasonically examined for section thickness.
b. A visual inspection of the suppression chamber interior, including water line regions and supports shall be made at each major refueling outage.

BASES The values specified for minimum wall thickness of the pressure suppression chamber have been established based upon the design of the pressure suppression chamber in conformance with Section III, Class B of the ASME Code., The design specification allows a I/16 inch corrosion allowance to the unpainted interior surface of the chamber. Thus with a design thickness of 0.3975 inch the corrosion allowance increases the thickness to 0.460 inch. How-ever, manufacturing increases the thickness to a,nominal 0.500 inch allowing 0.1025 inch greater than design. The limit of 0.420 inch provides a maigin over the design thickness and assures suppression chamber integrity.

f 1l

BASES, Continued The inspection frequency as established is conservative based on the observed change in thickness as determined from 1972 measure-ments to 1973 measurements in which there was no perceptible change after more than 20 individual relief valve operations.

To determine the status of the pressure suppression system, a visual inspection of the suppression chamber interior surFaces and structure, with water at its normal elevation, will be made at each major refueling outage. This inspection will assure that any gross defects are detected.

A 1

k'

'l I~