ML17261B146: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
Line 153: Line 153:
0          An analysis will be, performed to obtain the optimum setpoint and setpoint tolerance for the Degraded Voltage Relays.,
0          An analysis will be, performed to obtain the optimum setpoint and setpoint tolerance for the Degraded Voltage Relays.,
o          Calibration procedure PR-l.l will be revised to
o          Calibration procedure PR-l.l will be revised to
                                                   - incorporate these new setpoints and setpoint
                                                   - incorporate these new setpoints and setpoint tolerances.
                                                                      -
tolerances.
o          A new methodology for testing these relays will be incorporated into Periodic Test procedure PT-9.1.
o          A new methodology for testing these relays will be incorporated into Periodic Test procedure PT-9.1.
VI        ADDITIONAL INFORMATION A.        AFFECTED COMPONENTS:
VI        ADDITIONAL INFORMATION A.        AFFECTED COMPONENTS:

Latest revision as of 09:53, 4 February 2020

LER 90-008-01:on 900524,safeguards Buses Degraded Voltage Relays Miscalibrated.Caused by Wrong Setpoint Tolerance Being Specified in Calibr Procedure.Degraded Voltage Relays Calibr to Conservative Tolerance setpoint.W/900820 Ltr
ML17261B146
Person / Time
Site: Ginna Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 08/20/1990
From: Backus W, Mercredy R
ROCHESTER GAS & ELECTRIC CORP.
To:
NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
References
LER-90-008, LER-90-8, NUDOCS 9008290105
Download: ML17261B146 (14)


Text

ACCELERATED DISTRIBUTION DEM REGULATORY XNFORMATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (RIDS)

ACCESSION NBR:9008290105 DOC.DATE: 90/08/20 NOTARIZED- NO DOCKET FACIL:50-244 Robert Emmet Ginna Nuclear Plant, Unit 1, Rochester G 05000244 AUTH. NAME AUTHOR AFFILIATION BACKUS,W.H. Rochester Gas S Electric Corp.

MERCREDY,R.C. Rochester Gas 6 Electric .Corp.

RECIP.NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION

SUBJECT:

LER 90-008-01:on 900524,safeguards buses degraded voltage relays miscalibrated due to procedure inadequacy.

W/9 ltr.

DISTRXBUTION CODE: IE22T COPIES RECEXVED:ILTR ENCL SIZE:

TITLE: 50.73/50.9 Licensee Event Report (L

/

NOTES:License Exp date in accordance with 10CFR2,2.109(9/19/72) ~ 05000244 p

RECIPIENT COPIES RECIPXENT COPIES ID CODE/NAME LTTR ENCL D CODE/NAME LTTR ENCL PD1-3 LA 1 1 PD -3 PD 1 1 JOHNSON,A 1 1 INTERNAL: ACNW 2 2 AEOD/DOA 1 1 AEOD/DS P/TPAB 1 1 AEdD/ROAB/DSP 2 2 NRR/DET/ECMB 9H 1 1 NR6/DET/EMEB9H3 1 1 NRR/DLPQ/LHFB11 1 1 NRR/DLPQ/LPEB10 1 1 NRR/DOEA/OEAB11 1 1 NRR/DREP/PRPB11 2 2 NRR/DST/SELB 8D 1 1 NRR/DST/SICB 7E 1 1

-DS LB8D1 1 1 NRR/DST/SRXB 8E 1 1 G 02 1 1 RES/DSIR/EIB 1 1 RGN1 FILE 01 1 1 EXTERNAL: EGGG BRYCE,J.A 3 3 L ST LOBBY WARD 1 1 LPDR 1 1 NRC PDR 1 1 NSIC MAYS,G 1 1 NSgC MURPHY,G.A 1 1 NUDOCS FULL TXT 1 1 I

D A

,D D

NOTE TO ALL "RIDS" RECIPIENTS:

PLEASE HELP US TO REDUCE IVASTE! CONTACT THE DOCUMENT CONTROL DESK, ROOM P l-37 (EXT. 20079) TO ELIMINATEYOUR NAME FROM DISTRIBUTION LISTS FOR DOCUMENTS YOU DON'T NEED!

FULL TEXT CONVERSION REQUIRED TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED: LTTR 32 ENCL 32 tiDQ

nt ~

V i "s relic

'c 'tare ROCHESTER GAS AND ELECTRIC CORPORATION ~ 89 EAST AVENUE, ROCHESTER N. Y. 14649-0001 ROBERT C. MECREOY TELEPHONE Vice President AstEACOOE71B 546 27CO Cinna Nuclear Production August 20, 1990 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555 Sub)ect: LER 90-008 (Revision 01), Safeguards Buses Degraded Voltage Relays Miscalibrated Due To. Procedure Inadequacy Causes a Condition Prohibited By Plant Technical Specifications R. E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant Docket No. 50-244 In accordance with 10CFR50.73, Licensee Event Report System, Item (a)(2)(i)(B), which requires *a report of any operation prohibited by the Plant,'s Technical Specifications", the attached Licensee Event Report LER 90-008 (Revision 01) is hereby submitted. This revision is necessary to address applicable Technical Specification action statements and to clarify recalibration methodology.

Very truly yours, Robert C. Mecredy xc: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region I Allendale .Road 475 King of Prussia, PA 19406 Ginna USNRC Senior Resident Inspector.

0 gIP zIP~

9008290i05 900820 PDFl ADOCK 05000244 8 PDC

aaAC HN SN UJ. attcLtAA 1 IQULATOAPcoa>>owoN r&4$ 1 Ato10V IO ONI aNL SIN.0IO>>1 UCENSEE EVENT REPORT LER) tktaAII IISalll tocIUTT Noool III COCIIT Na>>oOI1 Ql R.E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant I"~'" Safeguards Buses o 4 o 0 02 44~0s08 Degraded Voltage Relays Misca1ibrated Due To Proceudre Inad a Causes A Condition Prohibited B Plant Technical S cifications CVCNT OATI I4 LC1 NUaaICA I4 Att011 OATI lll OTIII I IACILITII INVOLVlONI

~

aaONT>>a 'AT TCA1 TCAN i;. ~ LaarliarAL

~ >>a>>a>>OOA 11 VN>>O>>a aoONTN

~ >>ar I W 1 OAV 1 CAN tAOUTT aaoaaao OOCAI 1 NUaaII Ala 0 4 0 0 0 0 52490 90 0 0 0 1 0 8 2 0 9 0 0 4 0 0 0 OtIAATINO TIIII1lt01f It W4OITTCO tUAWANTT0 TNt AIOVIAlllINTI Ot llC11 fa ICaooo o>>>>o or oaoro or Oao ~ oa>>oaatr Illl aaOO I Nl St.oNlal NQSNIQIINI I11 I OI

~ OaaIA N.ANNIIIlll NM4IIII N.1$ 4IQllal SLT141 LcvIL 0 9 8 SI.ONla Ill I III NMNIQl NJSNIQIIaOS OTNC1 ItoaooV Io >>IA>>oooo

~ o>>oar o>>at ao Tooc>>1c tan SI.AN4IIIHNI N.T$ 4IQIIO N5 SlaIQIlaoOIAI SNAI SIANIINI Oal N.T Siol Ql Ill N.1$ 4IQllaNIQI SO.AN4InllN N.1 $ 4 I 0 II I4 N.1$ 4l QI Iol LICtNIIICONTACf t01 TIIQ LI1 Iltl TILttaaONI NUIIIC1 Wesley H. Backus *IIIACOOI Technical Assistant to the Operations Manager CO>>tLITI ONI LINC 501 CACN CCNotONCNT 5 AILUIIOIIC1I~ CO IN TNal 1Ct011 Illl C101TAILI :%~~'r.P I""A* UANUtAC>> lt01TAI CAVSI STlfill CoaotONINT aoANUtAC TVAC1 TO Nt10I >>~$ ~~~&k4 CAVSC TUAI1 TO NtAOI N

Nrk l>>I or

','~~'>~~g~gg r SVttLtlltNTAL1lt01f CXtlCTCO IIII lstlCTIO aaONTN C*T T CA1 LUINICSION OATI IIII YllIIIt>>. r>>>>U>>r>> 55tCCTCO 5VC>>I5510>> OATCI aktf AAcf IU>>o>> e Io>>NI aooo>>. l1, aooroooaao>>rt III>>oo aa>>at>>~ Ittoorra>>o o>>>>a>> ll4 On May 24, 1990 at 1604 EDST with the reactor at approximately 984 full power, an evaluation of undervoltage relay test; data revealed that five (5) of the eight (8) Degraded Voltage Relays on 480 volt safeguard buses were calibrated such that relay actuation would not occur within the limits of Technical Specifi-cations.

As this was a setpoint problem with the Degraded Voltage Relays, no immediate plant. or operator responses were necessary. 1 The underlying cause. of the event was attributed atocalibration the wrong setpoint and setpoint tolerance being specified in procedure.

Immediate corrective action was to calibrate the Degraded Voltage Relays to a setpoint on the conservative side of the Relays tolerance.

Subsequent to the calibration, the Degraded Voltage were tested satisfactorily and returned to service.

11C tae SN QADI

I IIAC 4'~ 444A V.4. AVCLCAA ASCVLATOAY COMMIS4IOH raeSI LICENSEE EVENT REPORT ILER) TEXT CONTINUATION 444AOv40 OM4 vO SISO&IOs 4IItIA44 4IS) %$

COCKET IIVMACA Ill LSA AVM44A I ~ I SSOVSHTtIL AIVISIQH VVU A vtIU 4A R. E. Ginna rEXr nr ~ SOSCe e ~ Nuclear Power Plant

~ OaeeOW +AC ~ ~'SS I ITS o 5 o o o 2 4490 0 0 8 0 1 02o~ 0 8 I ~ PRE-EVENT PLANT CONDIT10NS The unit was at approximately 984 reactor power. The Results and Test Department and an Electrical Engineering representative were observing the Relay Department performing protective relay calibration procedure PR-1.1 (480 Volt Undervoltage And Ground Alarm Scheme For Buses 14; 16, 17 and 18.)

II. DESCRIPTION OF EVENT A. DATES AND APPROXIMATE TIMES OF MAJOR OCCURRENCES:

0 Modification installation in 1982: Event date 0 May 24, 1990, 1115 EDST: Discovery date and time of the first of five relays found below the limit of Technical Specifications.

0 May 244 19904 1604 EDST, All affected relays recalibrated, tested satisfactorily. and restored to service.

B. EVENT:

On May 24, 1990 at 1604 EDST, with the reactor ht approximately 984 full power PR-1.1 was completed.

Evaluation of the PR-l.l data revealed that five (5) of the eight. (8) Degraded Voltage Relays on 480 volt safeguards buses 14, 16, 17, and 18 had been calibrated such that relay actuation would not occur within the limits of Technical Specifications, page 2.3-10, Figure 2.3-1. The relays affected were as follows: relays 27/14 on Bus 14, 27B/16 on Bus 16, 27/17 and 27B/17 on Bus 17 and 27/18 on Bus 18. This determination occur-red after evaluation and analysis of test data and Technical Specification recpxirements as follows:

vaC eOsM S44g

MAC /elm SSSA V.S. NVCLSAA AlOVLATOAVCCSSAIISSIOII 41l 1$

LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LERI TEXT CONTINUATION /

ASPAOV$ 0 OMS HO 11$ 0&IOs

$ )ISIA$ $ SI$ I %$

OOCIICT HVMOSA ITI LCA HVSSCIA ISI SS Q U S NTI4 L IIS v IS lO N

~0 M A H M R. E. Ginna TKXT IIT ~ aWCe S waver, ~ ~

Nuclear Power Plant lVAC Ann ~'ll II TI o s o o o 2 4 4 90 00 8 0 103 OFQ 8 The current 480 volt safeguards bus undervoltage system was first put in service in 1982. Setpoints were specified by Corporate Electrical Engineering, and these setpoints (with tolerances established by the Relay and Test, Department) were used to calibrate these relays over the past eight years.

0 On April 4, 1990 the normal annual calibration was performed on the 480 volt safeguards buses Degraded Voltage Relays, per PR-l.l. This procedure checks and calibrates the dropout voltage of the relays.

The procedure specified a + 54 calibration toler-ance on the dropout, setpoint with a "desired$

setpoint of 103.5'olts. All Degraded 'pecified Voltage Relays were calibrated to these specifica-tions. Because of the + tolerance allowed by the procedure some of the relays were calibrated to less than the "desired" 103.5 volts which was considered acceptable.

I o On April 12, 1990 the normal post calibration test was performed on the 480 volt safeguards buses Degraded Voltage Relays per periodic test procedure PT-9.1 (Undervoltage Protection 480 Volt Safeguard Buses)., This procedure checks the reset voltage of the relays and also the dropout response time, but does not check the dropout voltage. All Degraded Voltage Relays were found to be within the specifications of the procedure.

0 Prior to April 26, 1990 a review of the calibration data from April 4, 1990 and a review of plant Technical Specifications was performed by the ISI/IST Coordinator and an Electrical Engineering representative. Following this review, these in-dividuals requested that all Degraded Voltage

>>AC tv>> SSSA I> S. >>I>CLCAi ASOI>LATOIIYCO>>MISSIO>I W4S I LICENSEE EVENT REPORT ILER) TEXT CONTINUATION /

A>TAOVSD OMS >>0 SISOWI04 S)ttI>ISS S>SI 'SS LCII MI>>>Sill III S~ QUl>>T>AL i'IV>>IOU

%VU A HVU TA R. E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant o 5 o o o 2 4 4 90 00 8 0 1 04 ov nXr>>>~ a>>Ce >>~. ~ ~>>>IC a ~'>>Im Relays that were found at or below 103.5 volts be adjusted to greater than 103.5 volts. The greater than 103.5 volts was requested to ensure that all relays were within the Technical Specification limit of 103.5 volts prior to entering the plant mode for which these relays are required to be operable. Five Degraded Voltage Relays were adjusted on April 26, 1990.

On May ll, 1990 the normal monthly PT-9.1 was performed on all 480 volt safeguards buses Degraded Voltage Relays. This test was witnessed by an Electrical Engineering representative. After review of the test data, the Electrical Engineering representative expressed a concern that, based on the test reset data, actual dropout voltage of, 5 of the Degraded Voltage Relays may be below the Technical Specification 103.5 volt limit. Since, the PT-9.1 only tested the reset voltage for each relay an actual recalibration must be performed to determine the "as found" dropout voltage.

On May 24, 1990 PR-l.l was reperformed on the 5 Degraded Voltage Relays to verify their dropout voltage setpoint. At 1115 EDST, the dropout voltage of the first relay was checked and found below the Technical Specification limit of 103.5 volts. The degraded voltage relay was recalibrated and tested prior to being declared operable, then the four additional relays in question were tested in the same manner. Technical Specification Table 3.5-1, action statement 7, was entered. prior to the calibration of each relay and the calibrated relay was subsequently deemed operable following successful completion of PT-9.1. A review of the "as found" calibration date showed that the dropout voltages..of the other 4 relays were also below the Technical Specification limit of 103.5 volts.

This condition was determined to be reportable in accordance with 10CFR50.73 (a)(2)(i)(B).

0 On May 29, 1990 PT-9.1. was reperformed on all 480 volt safeguards buses Degraded Voltage Relays to check for possible setpoint drift. All relays tested satisfactorily.

IIAC Sacro $$$A V.$. MVCLCA1 AlOULAYOAYCCAOMI$$ 101 N4$ l LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER) TEXT CONTINUATION S ASSAOVCO OM$ 14 3150MIOO

$ )rSI1$ $ "$ r$ I %$

SACILltY 1AM 0 Ill OOCIIlf rlUM0$1 Ill L$ 1 rIVM4$1 1$ l SA4$ I$I

<<$ AA Soaulrr TrAL rrt Y l5 IO rr

'r rr A rrrrM R. E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant o 5 o o o 2 4 4 90 00 80 1 050FQQ TEXT IIS'rroro ance rl rOOrrooC rroo sororrol rrSIC Srorrr ~ $ I I ITI C. INOPERABLE STRUCTURES, COMPONENTS, OR SYSTEMS THAT CONTRIBUTED TO THE EVENT:

None.

D. OTHER SYSTEMS OR SECONDARY FUNCTIONS AFFECTED:

None.

METHOD OF DISCOVERY:

The event was made apparent during the performance of PR-1.1 on May 24, 1990.

F. OPERATOR ACTION:

As this was a setpoint problem with the Degraded Voltage Relays, no immediate operator action was necessary.

G. SAFETY SYSTEM RESPONSES:

None.,

III. CAUSE OF EVENT A. IMMEDIATE CAUSE'he immediate cause of the event was due to 5 of 8 Degraded Voltage Relays on 480 volt safeguard buses 14, 16, 17, and 18 being calibrated such that relay actuation would not, occur within the limits of Technical Specifi-cations.

B. ROOT CAUSE:

The root cause of the event discovered on May 24', 1990, was attributed to the calibration conditions that existed on April.26, 1990, during the previous calibra-tion of the five Degraded Voltage Relays. The underlying vol rgorr ooOJ

HAC Setm 1SSA. U.S. HUCLSAA AlOULATOIIYCOMMISSIOH l$4$ l LICENSEE EVENT REPORT ILERI TEXT CONTINUATION ASSAOYSO OMS HO )I$0&IOS 1 )It< A $ 5 ~ I1I 'SS I'ACILITYHAMI I'l OOCIIST HUMISII ITI Llll HUM' II I ~ I SS OU S H T I A L ting Y IS lO H U A M R. E. Ginna TSIT IN mme Swee e nOrreK Nuclear Power Plant

~ aAKanet HIIC Arm ~'M I ITI o s o o o 2 4490 00 8 0 10 60'8 cause of finding, setpoints below limits (in the past) is now evident and is due to the wrong setpoint and setpoint tolerance being specified in a calibration procedure. The calibration procedure for the safeguard bus Degraded Voltage Relays (PR-1.1) specified an acceptance criteria of 103.5 volts + 5%. Ginna Technical Specification figure 2.3-1 requires the Degraded

'oltage Relays to actuate when the relay voltages drop to 103.5 volts. (AC) which corresponds to 414 volts on the '480 volt safeguard bus. The relay setpoint of 103.5 volts was determined by RGGE Corporate Engineering and provided to Relay and Test Department for use,.in the calibration of these relays. However, no definitive tolerance band was provided with the desired setpoint;-

Normal vendor recommended tolerances were applied upon development of the calibration procedure. This resulted in the actual setpoint of these relays to be acceptable when left below the, required minimum dropout voltage of 103.5 volts.

I IV ANALYSIS OF &lENT This event is reportable in accordance with 10 CFR 50.73, Licensee Event Report System, item (a)(2)(i)(B), which requires a report of, "any operation prohibited by the plant's Technical Specifications." The 5 out of 8 Degraded Voltage Relays being calibrated such that relay actuation would not occur within the limits of Technical Specifications was an, operation prohibited by the plant Technical Specifica-tions..

An assessment was performed considering both the safety consequences and implications of this event with the following results and conclusions:

~ ~

~

~ ~ ' ' I I ~ I J ~

y

~

~ ~ II ~

~ ' - ~ ~ ~

~ ~

~ ~ ~

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ - ~

~ s ~

0 ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~

0 0

~ ~

> - ~ ~ ~ ~

~ II ~ ~

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0

~ II ~ ~ ~ ~

~ ~

~ ~ ~ Il

~ ~ e ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

~ ~

~ ~ ~ ~ ~

~ ~

~ ~

~ ~

~ 0 ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ II

~ 0 ~ ~ ~ 0

~ ~ ~ ~ 0

~ ~

NNC evttt SSSA V.S. NVCLTAA AlOVLATONYCOMMISSION I94JI LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LERI TEXT CONTINUATION /

AIteAOvlO OMl 40 JISOWIOS lNItIA$$ SI$ 1 1$

FACILITY NANO III OOCNST NVMOSII ITI NVMllNISI L$ 1 s e o v s tt T t A L tte tt IS tO tt V U 4 U ~A R. E. Ginna TTXT u'tten Secre r newer.

Nuclear Power Plant tre taeertt NAC Aetttt ~ 1I I I TI o s o o o 2 4490 00 8 0 l0 80r- 08 B. ACTION TAKEN OR PLANNED TO PREVENT RECUE&ENCE:

o The test conditions that existed on April 26, 1990, will be evaluated. As a result of this evaluation, be recommended.,

it is expected that improvements will Any relays calibrated after April 25, 1990, will be identified. The results of these calibrations will be reviewed for generic concerns with test conditions.

0 An analysis will be, performed to obtain the optimum setpoint and setpoint tolerance for the Degraded Voltage Relays.,

o Calibration procedure PR-l.l will be revised to

- incorporate these new setpoints and setpoint tolerances.

o A new methodology for testing these relays will be incorporated into Periodic Test procedure PT-9.1.

VI ADDITIONAL INFORMATION A. AFFECTED COMPONENTS:

The Degraded Voltage Relays are a Model 211B1175D Type ITE-27 relay manufactured by ITE Corporation.

B. PREVIOUS LER'S ON SIMILAR EVENTS:

A similar. LER event historical search was conducted with the following results: no documentation of similar LER events with the same root cause at Ginna Station could be identified.

C. SPECIAL COMMENTS:

None.