ML17265A666: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| issue date = 06/02/1999 | | issue date = 06/02/1999 | ||
| title = LER 99-009-00:on 990503,instrumentation Declared Inoperable in Multiple Channels Resulted in Condition Prohibited by Ts. Caused by Unanticipated High Frequency AC Voltage Ripple. Entered TS LCO 3.0.3.With 990602 Ltr | | title = LER 99-009-00:on 990503,instrumentation Declared Inoperable in Multiple Channels Resulted in Condition Prohibited by Ts. Caused by Unanticipated High Frequency AC Voltage Ripple. Entered TS LCO 3.0.3.With 990602 Ltr | ||
| author name = | | author name = Mecredy R, St Martin J | ||
| author affiliation = ROCHESTER GAS & ELECTRIC CORP. | | author affiliation = ROCHESTER GAS & ELECTRIC CORP. | ||
| addressee name = | | addressee name = Vissing G | ||
| addressee affiliation = NRC (Affiliation Not Assigned), NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM) | | addressee affiliation = NRC (Affiliation Not Assigned), NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM) | ||
| docket = 05000244 | | docket = 05000244 | ||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter: | {{#Wiki_filter:REGULATORY INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (RXDS) | ||
ACCESSZON NBR:9906080307 DOC.DATE: 99/06/02 NOTARIZED: NO ter G DOCKET I PACZL:50-244 Robert Emmet Ginna Nuclear Plant, Unit 1, Rochester 05000244 AUTH. NAME AUTHOR AFFILIATION ST MARTIN,J.T. Rochester Gas &. Electric Corp. | |||
MECREDY,R.C. ~ | |||
Rochester Gas &. Electric Corp. | |||
RECIP.NAME , RECIPIENT AFFILIATION VISSXNG,G.S. | |||
==SUBJECT:== | ==SUBJECT:== | ||
LER 99-009-00:on 990503,instrumentation declared inoperable in multiple channels resulted in condition prohibited by TS. | |||
Caused by unanticipated high frequency AC voltage ripp e. | |||
Entered TS LCO 3.0.3.With 990602 ltr. | |||
DISTRIBUTION CODE XE22T COPIES RECEIVED e LTR g ENCL TITLE: 50.73/50.9 Licensee Event Report (LER), Xncident Rpt, etc. | |||
( S IZE a G | |||
NOTES:License Exp date in accordance with 10CPR2,2.109(9/19/72) . 05000244 0 | |||
RECIPIENT COPIES RECIPIENT COPIES ZD CODE/NAME LTTR ENCL XD CODE/NAME LTTR ENCL LPD1-1 PD 1 1 VZSSXNG,G. 1 1 INTERNAL: AEOD/SPD/RRAB 1 1 FILE CENTER 1 1 NRR/DZPM/IOLB 1 ' R/DXPM/XQMB 1 1 NRR/DRIP/REXB 1 1 NRR/DSSA/SPLB 1 1 RES/DET/EIB 1 1 RGN1 PILE 01 1 1 EXTERNAL: L ST LOBBY WARD 1 1 LMXTCO MARSHALL 1 1 NOAC POORE,W. | |||
NRC PDR 1. | |||
1 1 | |||
1 NOAC QUEENER,DS NUDOCS FULL TXT 1 | |||
1 1 | |||
1 NOTE TO ALL "RIDS" RECIPIENTS: | |||
PLEASE HELP US TO REDUCE WASTE. TO HAVE YOUR NAME OR ORGANIZATION REMOVED FROM DISTRIBUTION LISTS OR REDUCE THE NUMBER OF COPIES RECEIVED BY YOU OR YOUR ORGANIZATION< | |||
CONTACT THE DOCUMENT CONTROL DESK (DCD) ON EXTENSION 41S-2083 FULL TEXT CONVERSION REQUIRED TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED: LTTR 16 ENCL 16 | |||
4HD ROCHESTfR GAS AND E'ELECTRIC CORFORATION ~ 89EASTAVENUE, ROCHfSTER, N, Y I46d9.000I AREA CODE216 586-27M RosERT c. MEcREDY Vice Presislenl t4uc!eor Operosions June 2, 1999 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk Attn: Guy S. Vissing Project Directorate I-1 Washington, D.C. 20555 | |||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
. | . LER 1999-009, Instrumentation Declared Inoperable in Multiple Channels Results in Condition Prohibited by Technical Specifications R.E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant Docket No. 50-244 | ||
==Dear Mr. Vissing:== | |||
The attached Licensee Event Report LER 1999-009 is submitted in accordance with 10 CFR 50.73, Licensee Event Report System, item (a) (2) (i) (B), "Any operation or condition prohibited by the plant's Technical Specifications". | |||
Very ruly yours, XC: Mr. Guy S. Vissing (Mail Stop 8C2) | |||
Project Directorate I-1 Division of Reactor Projects I/II Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555 Regional Administrator, Region I U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 475 Allendale Road | |||
+t King of Prussia, PA 19406 U.S. NRC Ginna Senior Resident Inspector 990b080307 'll's!0602 PDR ADQCK 05000244 S PDR | |||
NRC FORM 866 IB I%BI U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION M5Q''Ik rN p NIIsp@e i''gA'P %88Sy coBoctP)a rortuost: 50 hrs. Reported lessons learned 'nformation are ncorporated krto the Bcenskrg process and fod back to hdustry. Forward comments regarding burden estimate to the LICENSEE EYENT REPORT (LER) Records Msnagernont Branch p4 F33), U.S. Nudear Regulatory Commfssbn, Wasfsngton, DC 205554001 and to ~ | |||
fSoe reverse for required number of the Paperwork Reduction Project (31500104), Ofree of | |||
'digitslcharacters for each b(ockl Management and Budget, WasNngton, DC 20503. If an information coeect'on does not display a currendy vs M OMB, control number, the NRC may not conduct or sponsor. and a FACILITY NAME I 11 DOCKET NUMBER I2) PAGE I3) | |||
R. E. Ginna Nuc(ear Power Plant 05000244 1 OF 7 I | |||
TITLE te) | |||
Instrumentation Declared Inoperable in Multiple Channels Results in Condition Prohibited by Technical Specifications EVENT DATE (5) LER NUMBER (6) REPORT DATE (7) OTHER FACILITIES INVOLVED (6) | |||
FACfLITYNAME DOCKET NUMSER SEOUFNTIAL RENSION OAY MONTH ON NUMBER NUMBER 05000 05 03 1999, 1999 ", 009 - 00 06 02 1999 FACILrTY NAME OOCKETNUMSER 05000 OPERATING THIS REPORT IS SUBMITTFD P URSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF 10 CFR B: (Check one or more) (11) | |||
MODE (9) 20.2201(b) 20.2203(a)(2)(v) X 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B) 50.73(a)(2) (viii) | |||
POWER 20.2203(a)(1) 20.2203(a) (3) (i) 50.73(a) (2) (ii) 50.73(a}(2}(x) | |||
LEVEL (10) 090 20.2203(a) (2) (i) 20.2203(a)(3) (ii) 50.73(a}(2l(iii) 73.71 20.2203(a)(2)(ii) 20.2203(a}(4) 50.73(a)(2wiv) OTHER 20.2203(a) (2) (iii} 50.36(cl(1) 50.73(a)(2)(v) Specify m Abstract below 20.2203(a)(2)(iv) 50.36(c)(2) 50.73(a)(2)(vii) or in NRC Form 355A LICENSEE CONTACT FOR THIS LER (12) | |||
TELEPMONE NUMSER (Inrrude Ares Code) | |||
John T. St. Martin - Technical Assistant (716) 771-3641 REPORTABLE REPORTABLE CAUSE SYSTEM COMPONOIT MANUFACTURER CAUSE SYS'fEM MANUFACTURER TO EPOS TO EPIX SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT EXPECTED (l4) EXPECTED IlONTH OAY YES NO SUBMISSION (If yes, complete EXPECTED SUBMISSION DATE). X DATE R5) | |||
ABSTRACT (Limit to 1400 spaces, i.e., approximately 15 single. spaced typewritten lines} (16) | |||
On May 3, 1999, the plant was in Mode 1 at approximately 90% steady state reactor power. It had previously been determined that Overtemperature Delta T and Overpower Delta T bistable trip setpoints were potentially non-conservative on three out of four reactor protection system channels, and an evaluation was in progress. At approximately 2330 EDST, instrumentation for these three channels was declared inoperable. | |||
Immediate corrective action was to entei Technical Specification Limiting Condition for Operation 3.0.3, and take actions to restore the channels to operable status. Following replacement of the affected bistables with bistab(es of a different design, the bistable trip setpoints were recalibrated and three of four channels were declared operable. The plant exited Limiting Condition for Operation 3.0.3. | |||
The underlying cause of the event was an unanticipated high frequency AC voltage ripple on the Delta T signals that adversely affected the trip setpoints for the bistables. | |||
Corrective action to prevent recurrence is outlined in Section V.B. | |||
~ | |||
~ ~ | |||
~ III ~ ~ | |||
~ ~ | |||
C ~ | |||
' S i I ~ ~ i ~ I ' ~ ~ ~ | |||
~ ~ I | |||
~ ' ~ ~ | |||
~ ' ~ ~ I ' ~ ~ ~ ~ | |||
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ | |||
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ | |||
~ ~ | |||
' ~ ~ ~ ~ | |||
' ~; ~ ' ~ ~ | |||
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ | |||
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~: ~ ~ | |||
' ~ ~ | |||
~; | |||
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ | |||
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ | |||
~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~ | |||
~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ | |||
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ | |||
' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ | |||
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ | |||
' ~ ~ ~ ~ | |||
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ | |||
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ | |||
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ | |||
I ~ ~ ~ ~ | |||
~ | |||
~ ~ ~ | |||
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ | |||
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' | |||
~; | |||
~ ~ ~ | |||
~ ~ | |||
. ~ ~ | |||
~ | |||
~ ~ | |||
~ | |||
~: ' | |||
~ ~ | |||
~ | |||
II | |||
~ | |||
I I | |||
~ ~ | |||
o | |||
~ ~ ~ | |||
~ ~ ~ | |||
~ .. I. | |||
~ ~ | |||
~ | |||
~ | |||
~ | |||
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ | |||
~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' | |||
~ ~ * | |||
~ | |||
~ | |||
~ ~ | |||
~: | |||
. I | |||
~ ~ | |||
~ | |||
I | |||
~ | |||
~ | |||
~ ~ | |||
~ | |||
~: ~ | |||
~ ~ ~ | |||
~ | |||
~ ~ ~ | |||
~ ~ ~ | |||
I~ | |||
~ | |||
~ | |||
~ ~ ~ | |||
~ ~ ~ | |||
~ | |||
~ ~ ~ ~ | |||
~ ~ | |||
~ ~ | |||
~ ~ | |||
~ | |||
~ ~ | |||
~ ~ | |||
~ ~ | |||
~ ~ | |||
~ | |||
~: | |||
~ | |||
~ | |||
~ ~ | |||
~ | |||
~ | |||
~ | |||
~ ~ | |||
~ ~ ~ | |||
~ ~ ~ | |||
~ | |||
~ | |||
~ | |||
~ | |||
~ . e ~ | |||
~ | |||
~ ~ | |||
~ ~ ~ ~ | |||
~ ~ ~ ~ | |||
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ | |||
I~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ | |||
' ~ ~ ' . ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ | |||
~ ~ ~ | |||
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o | |||
~ ~ ~ ~ | |||
' ~ ~ ~ ~ | |||
NRC FORM 366A U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION | |||
$ 1999) | |||
LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER) | |||
TEXT CONTINUATION FACILITY NAME (1) DOCKET (2) LER NUMBER (6) PAGE(3) .. | |||
SEOUEMTIA( 8EVSIOII IIUMBN ImMBN R.E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant 05000244 - | |||
1999 009 00 3 OF 7 TEXT Iifmore spaceis required, use additional copies of NRC Form 366'17) | |||
The Plant Operations Review Committee (PORC) was convened at approximately 1900 EDST to review this situation. PORC concurred that reducing power to 90% was a prudent measure. Channel 2 bistables, in service for more than 18 months, were not affected by this condition. Channel 2 was proven fully operable and channel 1 was currently in the tripped mode. Thus, continued plant operation was permissible, while bistable operability was assessed by NES personnel. Preliminary calculations were subsequently performed by NES staff. These calculations indicated that RPS channel 1 bistable trip setpoints were within design limits. The margin for OT DT and OP DT were low, but the bistables were considered operable. | |||
II. DESCRIPTION OF EVENT: | |||
A. DATES AND APPROXIMATE TIMES OF MAJOR OCCURRENCES'ay 3, 1999, 0820 EDST: RPS channel 1 is removed from service and declared inoperable to perform troubleshooting ((per CPI-TRIP-TEST-5.10)). | |||
May 3, 1999, dayshift: AC ripple is discovered in RPS channel 1. Later, AC ripple is discovered in RPS channels 3 and 4. | |||
May 3, 1999, 2330 EDST: Event Date and Time and Discovery Date and Time. | |||
May 3, 1999, 2347 EDST: Plant shutdown initiated. | |||
May 4, 1999, 0136 EDST: RPS channel 1 is declared operable. | |||
May 4, 1999, 0428 EDST: RPS channel 3 is declared operable. | |||
May 4, 1999, 0428 EDST: ITS LCO 3.0.3 is exited. Plant shutdown is stopped at 21% | |||
power. | |||
May 4, 1999, 2121 EDST: RPS channel 4 is declared operable. | |||
EVENT: | |||
On May 3, 1999, the plant was in Mode 1 at approximately 90% steady state reactor power after the power decrease from full power, which was started at approximately 1840 EDST and completed at approximately 2000 EDST. NES personnel completed the calculations, which now indicated that RPS channel 1 bistables were not operable. The Shift Supervisor and plant management were immediately notified. At approximately 2330 EDST, based on the revised calculational data, it was determined that three affected channels of RPS (channels 1, 3 and 4) be declared inoperable. | |||
I' e ~ | |||
~ s I ~ | |||
~ ~ II ~ ' | |||
~ ' I | |||
' ~ ~ ~ ' ~ | |||
' ~ | |||
~ ~ | |||
' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ | |||
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~ | |||
~ ~ ~ | |||
' ~ ~ ~ ' | |||
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ | |||
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ | |||
~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~ | |||
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ | |||
~ ~ | |||
~ | |||
' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ | |||
' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ | |||
~ ~ | |||
' ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ | |||
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~ | |||
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ | |||
' ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ | |||
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ | |||
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' | |||
~ ' ~ ~ ~ I ~ I~ ~ ~ | |||
~ ~ ~ ~ | |||
~ ~ ~ | |||
~ ' ~ ~ ~ | |||
~ ~ ~ a | |||
~ I ~ ~ ~ | |||
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' | |||
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ | |||
~ . ~ ' | |||
~ ~ ~ | |||
~ ~ | |||
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ | |||
~ s ~ ~ | |||
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ' ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ | |||
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ | |||
' ~ | |||
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ | |||
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~ | |||
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ | |||
~ ~ ~ | |||
~ ~ ~ | |||
~ | ~ | ||
0 ~ | |||
~ ~ | |||
~ ~ II ~ I gg I ~ | |||
~ ' ~ t ' I 4 | |||
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ | |||
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ | |||
' ~ | |||
~ ~ ~ | |||
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ | |||
~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ | |||
~ I ' ~ | |||
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ | |||
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ : ~ . ~ ~ | |||
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ | |||
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ | |||
~ ~ | |||
~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ | |||
~ ~ ~ | |||
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ | |||
~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ | |||
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ | |||
' ~ ~ ~ | |||
~ ~ ~ | |||
~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ | |||
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ | |||
~ t ~ ~ ~ ' | |||
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ | |||
~ ~ ' ~ ' ~ ~ | |||
'I NRC FORM 366A U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION (CISSS) | |||
LlCENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER) | |||
TEXT CONTINUATION | |||
~ FACILITY NAME I1) DOCKET I2) LER NUMBER Ie) PAGE I3) | |||
SEQUENTIAL REYISION YEAR NUMSER NUMSER R.E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant 05000244 1999 009 00 6 OF 7 TEXT (Ifmore spaceis required, use additional copies of itiRC Form 366AJ I17) | |||
IV. ANALYSIS OF EVENT: | |||
This event is reportable in accordance with 10 CFR 50.73, Licensee Event Report System, item (a) (2) (i) | |||
(B), "Any operation or condition prohibited by the plant's Technical Specifications" The entry into ITS LCO | |||
~ | |||
3.0.3 as a result of declaring more than one Function in ITS Table 3.3.1-1 inoperable is considered to be a condition prohibited by Technical Specifications. | |||
An assessment was performed considering both the safety consequences and implications of this event with the following results and conclusions: | |||
There were no operational or safety consequences attributed to three RPS channels for OT DT and OP DT being inoperable. A more detailed post-event review was performed. It has subsequently been determined that only one trip function (RPS channel 3 OP DT) was actually inoperable. This determination is based on the as-found data and a more rigorous analysis of the associated instrument uncertainties. All four OT DT channels were found to be within accident analysis assumptions, after accounting for the as-found margin to trip setpoint and incorporating the appropriate instrument uncertainties. Hence, the only function that would not have actuated within the bounds of the Ginna Station accident analysis was one channel of OP DT. With three operable channels available and a 2 out of 4 logic to provide the required trip function, there is adequate assurance that the reactor protection system would have performed within its required envelope as assumed in the accident analysis. | |||
Based on the above, it can be concluded that the public's health and safety was assured at all times. | |||
V. CORRECTIVE ACTION: | |||
A. ACTION TAKEN TO RETURN AFFECTED SYSTEMS TO PRE-EVENT NORMAL STATUS: | |||
Following replacement of bistables and calibration of the bistables in RPS channels 1 and 3, three channels (channels 1 and 3 and previously unaffected channel 2) were declared operable. | |||
ACTION TAKEN OR PLANNED TO PREVENT RECURRENCE: | |||
NUS indicated that they will be updating the parts list to remove the incorrectly sized component. | |||
NES personnel designed a modification to the math modules to eliminate the effects of AC ripple on the OP DT and OT DT bistable trip setpoints. This modification has been implemented. | |||
NRC FORM 366A U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION g IBBBI LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER) | |||
TEXT CONTINUATION | |||
~ FACILITY NAME I1) DOCKET I2) LER NUMBER I6) PAGE I3) | |||
SB)UalTIAl RSNSIOH IIUMBIA IIUMBBI R.E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant 05000244 1999 - 003 00 7 OF 7 TEXT llfmore spaceis required, use additional copies of NRC Form 866AJ I17) o This event is being reviewed for any potential lessons to be learned and applied to the appropriate parts of the Ginna modification process: design, procurement, installation, testing. | |||
The industry will be notified of this event via an entry in the Nuclear NETWORK system. | |||
VI ~ ADDITIONALINFORMATION: | |||
A. FAILED COMPONENTS: | |||
None B. PREVIOUS LERs ON SIMILAR EVENTS: | |||
A similar LER event historical search was conducted with the following results: No documentation of similar LER events with the same root cause at Ginna Nuclear Power Plant could be identified. | |||
C. SPECIAL COMMENTS: | |||
None}} |
Latest revision as of 10:10, 4 February 2020
ML17265A666 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Ginna ![]() |
Issue date: | 06/02/1999 |
From: | Mecredy R, St Martin J ROCHESTER GAS & ELECTRIC CORP. |
To: | Vissing G NRC (Affiliation Not Assigned), NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM) |
References | |
LER-99-009, LER-99-9, NUDOCS 9906080307 | |
Download: ML17265A666 (13) | |
Text
REGULATORY INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (RXDS)
ACCESSZON NBR:9906080307 DOC.DATE: 99/06/02 NOTARIZED: NO ter G DOCKET I PACZL:50-244 Robert Emmet Ginna Nuclear Plant, Unit 1, Rochester 05000244 AUTH. NAME AUTHOR AFFILIATION ST MARTIN,J.T. Rochester Gas &. Electric Corp.
MECREDY,R.C. ~
Rochester Gas &. Electric Corp.
RECIP.NAME , RECIPIENT AFFILIATION VISSXNG,G.S.
SUBJECT:
LER 99-009-00:on 990503,instrumentation declared inoperable in multiple channels resulted in condition prohibited by TS.
Caused by unanticipated high frequency AC voltage ripp e.
Entered TS LCO 3.0.3.With 990602 ltr.
DISTRIBUTION CODE XE22T COPIES RECEIVED e LTR g ENCL TITLE: 50.73/50.9 Licensee Event Report (LER), Xncident Rpt, etc.
( S IZE a G
NOTES:License Exp date in accordance with 10CPR2,2.109(9/19/72) . 05000244 0
RECIPIENT COPIES RECIPIENT COPIES ZD CODE/NAME LTTR ENCL XD CODE/NAME LTTR ENCL LPD1-1 PD 1 1 VZSSXNG,G. 1 1 INTERNAL: AEOD/SPD/RRAB 1 1 FILE CENTER 1 1 NRR/DZPM/IOLB 1 ' R/DXPM/XQMB 1 1 NRR/DRIP/REXB 1 1 NRR/DSSA/SPLB 1 1 RES/DET/EIB 1 1 RGN1 PILE 01 1 1 EXTERNAL: L ST LOBBY WARD 1 1 LMXTCO MARSHALL 1 1 NOAC POORE,W.
NRC PDR 1.
1 1
1 NOAC QUEENER,DS NUDOCS FULL TXT 1
1 1
1 NOTE TO ALL "RIDS" RECIPIENTS:
PLEASE HELP US TO REDUCE WASTE. TO HAVE YOUR NAME OR ORGANIZATION REMOVED FROM DISTRIBUTION LISTS OR REDUCE THE NUMBER OF COPIES RECEIVED BY YOU OR YOUR ORGANIZATION<
CONTACT THE DOCUMENT CONTROL DESK (DCD) ON EXTENSION 41S-2083 FULL TEXT CONVERSION REQUIRED TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED: LTTR 16 ENCL 16
4HD ROCHESTfR GAS AND E'ELECTRIC CORFORATION ~ 89EASTAVENUE, ROCHfSTER, N, Y I46d9.000I AREA CODE216 586-27M RosERT c. MEcREDY Vice Presislenl t4uc!eor Operosions June 2, 1999 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk Attn: Guy S. Vissing Project Directorate I-1 Washington, D.C. 20555
Subject:
. LER 1999-009, Instrumentation Declared Inoperable in Multiple Channels Results in Condition Prohibited by Technical Specifications R.E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant Docket No. 50-244
Dear Mr. Vissing:
The attached Licensee Event Report LER 1999-009 is submitted in accordance with 10 CFR 50.73, Licensee Event Report System, item (a) (2) (i) (B), "Any operation or condition prohibited by the plant's Technical Specifications".
Very ruly yours, XC: Mr. Guy S. Vissing (Mail Stop 8C2)
Project Directorate I-1 Division of Reactor Projects I/II Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555 Regional Administrator, Region I U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 475 Allendale Road
+t King of Prussia, PA 19406 U.S. NRC Ginna Senior Resident Inspector 990b080307 'll's!0602 PDR ADQCK 05000244 S PDR
NRC FORM 866 IB I%BI U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION M5QIk rN p NIIsp@e igA'P %88Sy coBoctP)a rortuost: 50 hrs. Reported lessons learned 'nformation are ncorporated krto the Bcenskrg process and fod back to hdustry. Forward comments regarding burden estimate to the LICENSEE EYENT REPORT (LER) Records Msnagernont Branch p4 F33), U.S. Nudear Regulatory Commfssbn, Wasfsngton, DC 205554001 and to ~
fSoe reverse for required number of the Paperwork Reduction Project (31500104), Ofree of
'digitslcharacters for each b(ockl Management and Budget, WasNngton, DC 20503. If an information coeect'on does not display a currendy vs M OMB, control number, the NRC may not conduct or sponsor. and a FACILITY NAME I 11 DOCKET NUMBER I2) PAGE I3)
R. E. Ginna Nuc(ear Power Plant 05000244 1 OF 7 I
TITLE te)
Instrumentation Declared Inoperable in Multiple Channels Results in Condition Prohibited by Technical Specifications EVENT DATE (5) LER NUMBER (6) REPORT DATE (7) OTHER FACILITIES INVOLVED (6)
FACfLITYNAME DOCKET NUMSER SEOUFNTIAL RENSION OAY MONTH ON NUMBER NUMBER 05000 05 03 1999, 1999 ", 009 - 00 06 02 1999 FACILrTY NAME OOCKETNUMSER 05000 OPERATING THIS REPORT IS SUBMITTFD P URSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF 10 CFR B: (Check one or more) (11)
MODE (9) 20.2201(b) 20.2203(a)(2)(v) X 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B) 50.73(a)(2) (viii)
POWER 20.2203(a)(1) 20.2203(a) (3) (i) 50.73(a) (2) (ii) 50.73(a}(2}(x)
LEVEL (10) 090 20.2203(a) (2) (i) 20.2203(a)(3) (ii) 50.73(a}(2l(iii) 73.71 20.2203(a)(2)(ii) 20.2203(a}(4) 50.73(a)(2wiv) OTHER 20.2203(a) (2) (iii} 50.36(cl(1) 50.73(a)(2)(v) Specify m Abstract below 20.2203(a)(2)(iv) 50.36(c)(2) 50.73(a)(2)(vii) or in NRC Form 355A LICENSEE CONTACT FOR THIS LER (12)
TELEPMONE NUMSER (Inrrude Ares Code)
John T. St. Martin - Technical Assistant (716) 771-3641 REPORTABLE REPORTABLE CAUSE SYSTEM COMPONOIT MANUFACTURER CAUSE SYS'fEM MANUFACTURER TO EPOS TO EPIX SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT EXPECTED (l4) EXPECTED IlONTH OAY YES NO SUBMISSION (If yes, complete EXPECTED SUBMISSION DATE). X DATE R5)
ABSTRACT (Limit to 1400 spaces, i.e., approximately 15 single. spaced typewritten lines} (16)
On May 3, 1999, the plant was in Mode 1 at approximately 90% steady state reactor power. It had previously been determined that Overtemperature Delta T and Overpower Delta T bistable trip setpoints were potentially non-conservative on three out of four reactor protection system channels, and an evaluation was in progress. At approximately 2330 EDST, instrumentation for these three channels was declared inoperable.
Immediate corrective action was to entei Technical Specification Limiting Condition for Operation 3.0.3, and take actions to restore the channels to operable status. Following replacement of the affected bistables with bistab(es of a different design, the bistable trip setpoints were recalibrated and three of four channels were declared operable. The plant exited Limiting Condition for Operation 3.0.3.
The underlying cause of the event was an unanticipated high frequency AC voltage ripple on the Delta T signals that adversely affected the trip setpoints for the bistables.
Corrective action to prevent recurrence is outlined in Section V.B.
~
~ ~
~ III ~ ~
~ ~
C ~
' S i I ~ ~ i ~ I ' ~ ~ ~
~ ~ I
~ ' ~ ~
~ ' ~ ~ I ' ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~
' ~ ~ ~ ~
' ~; ~ ' ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~: ~ ~
' ~ ~
~;
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
' ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
I ~ ~ ~ ~
~
~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '
~;
~ ~ ~
~ ~
. ~ ~
~
~ ~
~
~: '
~ ~
~
II
~
I I
~ ~
o
~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~
~ .. I.
~ ~
~
~
~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '
~ ~ *
~
~
~ ~
~:
. I
~ ~
~
I
~
~
~ ~
~
~: ~
~ ~ ~
~
~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~
I~
~
~
~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~
~
~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~
~ ~
~ ~
~
~ ~
~ ~
~ ~
~ ~
~
~:
~
~
~ ~
~
~
~
~ ~
~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~
~
~
~
~
~ . e ~
~
~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
I~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~
' ~ ~ ' . ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o
~ ~ ~ ~
' ~ ~ ~ ~
NRC FORM 366A U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
$ 1999)
LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER)
TEXT CONTINUATION FACILITY NAME (1) DOCKET (2) LER NUMBER (6) PAGE(3) ..
SEOUEMTIA( 8EVSIOII IIUMBN ImMBN R.E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant 05000244 -
1999 009 00 3 OF 7 TEXT Iifmore spaceis required, use additional copies of NRC Form 366'17)
The Plant Operations Review Committee (PORC) was convened at approximately 1900 EDST to review this situation. PORC concurred that reducing power to 90% was a prudent measure. Channel 2 bistables, in service for more than 18 months, were not affected by this condition. Channel 2 was proven fully operable and channel 1 was currently in the tripped mode. Thus, continued plant operation was permissible, while bistable operability was assessed by NES personnel. Preliminary calculations were subsequently performed by NES staff. These calculations indicated that RPS channel 1 bistable trip setpoints were within design limits. The margin for OT DT and OP DT were low, but the bistables were considered operable.
II. DESCRIPTION OF EVENT:
A. DATES AND APPROXIMATE TIMES OF MAJOR OCCURRENCES'ay 3, 1999, 0820 EDST: RPS channel 1 is removed from service and declared inoperable to perform troubleshooting ((per CPI-TRIP-TEST-5.10)).
May 3, 1999, dayshift: AC ripple is discovered in RPS channel 1. Later, AC ripple is discovered in RPS channels 3 and 4.
May 3, 1999, 2330 EDST: Event Date and Time and Discovery Date and Time.
May 3, 1999, 2347 EDST: Plant shutdown initiated.
May 4, 1999, 0136 EDST: RPS channel 1 is declared operable.
May 4, 1999, 0428 EDST: RPS channel 3 is declared operable.
May 4, 1999, 0428 EDST: ITS LCO 3.0.3 is exited. Plant shutdown is stopped at 21%
power.
May 4, 1999, 2121 EDST: RPS channel 4 is declared operable.
EVENT:
On May 3, 1999, the plant was in Mode 1 at approximately 90% steady state reactor power after the power decrease from full power, which was started at approximately 1840 EDST and completed at approximately 2000 EDST. NES personnel completed the calculations, which now indicated that RPS channel 1 bistables were not operable. The Shift Supervisor and plant management were immediately notified. At approximately 2330 EDST, based on the revised calculational data, it was determined that three affected channels of RPS (channels 1, 3 and 4) be declared inoperable.
I' e ~
~ s I ~
~ ~ II ~ '
~ ' I
' ~ ~ ~ ' ~
' ~
~ ~
' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~
' ~ ~ ~ '
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~
~ ~
~
' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~
' ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
' ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '
~ ' ~ ~ ~ I ~ I~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~
~ ' ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ a
~ I ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ . ~ '
~ ~ ~
~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ s ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ' ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
' ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~
~
0 ~
~ ~
~ ~ II ~ I gg I ~
~ ' ~ t ' I 4
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
' ~
~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~
~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ I ' ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ : ~ . ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~
~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
' ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ t ~ ~ ~ '
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ' ~ ' ~ ~
'I NRC FORM 366A U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION (CISSS)
LlCENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER)
TEXT CONTINUATION
~ FACILITY NAME I1) DOCKET I2) LER NUMBER Ie) PAGE I3)
SEQUENTIAL REYISION YEAR NUMSER NUMSER R.E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant 05000244 1999 009 00 6 OF 7 TEXT (Ifmore spaceis required, use additional copies of itiRC Form 366AJ I17)
IV. ANALYSIS OF EVENT:
This event is reportable in accordance with 10 CFR 50.73, Licensee Event Report System, item (a) (2) (i)
(B), "Any operation or condition prohibited by the plant's Technical Specifications" The entry into ITS LCO
~
3.0.3 as a result of declaring more than one Function in ITS Table 3.3.1-1 inoperable is considered to be a condition prohibited by Technical Specifications.
An assessment was performed considering both the safety consequences and implications of this event with the following results and conclusions:
There were no operational or safety consequences attributed to three RPS channels for OT DT and OP DT being inoperable. A more detailed post-event review was performed. It has subsequently been determined that only one trip function (RPS channel 3 OP DT) was actually inoperable. This determination is based on the as-found data and a more rigorous analysis of the associated instrument uncertainties. All four OT DT channels were found to be within accident analysis assumptions, after accounting for the as-found margin to trip setpoint and incorporating the appropriate instrument uncertainties. Hence, the only function that would not have actuated within the bounds of the Ginna Station accident analysis was one channel of OP DT. With three operable channels available and a 2 out of 4 logic to provide the required trip function, there is adequate assurance that the reactor protection system would have performed within its required envelope as assumed in the accident analysis.
Based on the above, it can be concluded that the public's health and safety was assured at all times.
V. CORRECTIVE ACTION:
A. ACTION TAKEN TO RETURN AFFECTED SYSTEMS TO PRE-EVENT NORMAL STATUS:
Following replacement of bistables and calibration of the bistables in RPS channels 1 and 3, three channels (channels 1 and 3 and previously unaffected channel 2) were declared operable.
ACTION TAKEN OR PLANNED TO PREVENT RECURRENCE:
NUS indicated that they will be updating the parts list to remove the incorrectly sized component.
NES personnel designed a modification to the math modules to eliminate the effects of AC ripple on the OP DT and OT DT bistable trip setpoints. This modification has been implemented.
NRC FORM 366A U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION g IBBBI LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER)
TEXT CONTINUATION
~ FACILITY NAME I1) DOCKET I2) LER NUMBER I6) PAGE I3)
SB)UalTIAl RSNSIOH IIUMBIA IIUMBBI R.E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant 05000244 1999 - 003 00 7 OF 7 TEXT llfmore spaceis required, use additional copies of NRC Form 866AJ I17) o This event is being reviewed for any potential lessons to be learned and applied to the appropriate parts of the Ginna modification process: design, procurement, installation, testing.
The industry will be notified of this event via an entry in the Nuclear NETWORK system.
VI ~ ADDITIONALINFORMATION:
A. FAILED COMPONENTS:
None B. PREVIOUS LERs ON SIMILAR EVENTS:
A similar LER event historical search was conducted with the following results: No documentation of similar LER events with the same root cause at Ginna Nuclear Power Plant could be identified.
C. SPECIAL COMMENTS:
None