ML17326A283: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
| issue date = 10/09/1979
| issue date = 10/09/1979
| title = LER 79-030/03L-0:on 790909,while at 81% Power,Delta Flux Indication Was Below Tech Spec Limit.Caused by Operator Error.Procedures Have Been Revised
| title = LER 79-030/03L-0:on 790909,while at 81% Power,Delta Flux Indication Was Below Tech Spec Limit.Caused by Operator Error.Procedures Have Been Revised
| author name = MURPHY C E
| author name = Murphy C
| author affiliation = INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER CO.
| author affiliation = INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER CO.
| addressee name =  
| addressee name =  
Line 17: Line 17:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:U.S.NUCLEARREGULATORY COMMISSION NTREPORTtPLEASEPRINTORTYPEALLREQUIREDINFORMATION)
{{#Wiki_filter:NRC FORM 366                                                                                                                            U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION (7.77)
NRCFORM366(7.77)P~CONTROLBLOCK:ENSEEEVEQI3Q~O2526LICENSETYPE3057CAT58Q0980I,6[OO~]Q2OOOOOO789LICENSEECODE1415LICENSENUMBERCON'T01soURGEMLQBO5OOO316Q7O9O979QB100986061DOCKETNUMBER6869FVENTDATE7475REPORTDATEEVENTDESCRIPTION ANDPROBABL.E CONSEQUENCES Q10~02,AFTERCOMPLETION OFINCOREEXCORECROSSCALIRAT~03POWERWASBEINGESCALATED TO100%.ONREACHING"81%
P   ~                                                     ENSEE EVE NT REPORT CONTROL BLOCK:                                                       QI                tPLEASE PRINT OR TYPE ALL REQUIRED INFORMATION)
POWERTHEDELTAFLUXINDICA-TIONWASOUTOFTHETARGETBANDFORAN'.ESTIMATED 21-22MINUTES.TH~OS~06TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION LIMITOF84%'BUTVIOLATESAMORERESTRICTIVE ADMINISTRATIV LIMITOF81%IMPOSEDPENDINGREVISIONOFTECHNICAL PF~07~OB8078~0978SYSTEMCAUSECAUSECOMP.VALVECODECODESUBCODECOMPONENT CODESUBCODESUBCODE~XXQ11DQ12~1Q13ZZZZZZQE~ZQEE~ZQER910111213181920SEQUENTIAL OCCURRENCE REPORTREVISIONLFRIROEVENTYEARREPORTNO.CODETYPENO.Q17REPORT~79~~QQ2122232426272829303132ACTIONFUTUREEFFECTSHUTDOWNATTACHMENT NPRDQPRIMECOMP.COMPONENT TAKENACTIONONPLANTMETHODHOURSQ22SUBMITTED FORMSUB.SUPPLIERMANUFACTURER
[OO~]
~GQ)B~ZQ19,~ZQ20MZQ21<<<<~YQ23I~IQ24L~JQ26>>>>Q"3334353637404142434447CAUSEDESCRIPTION ANDCORRECTIVE ACTIONSQ27oTHEOPERATORWHILEPERFORMING THEPAXIALFLUXLIMITSDIFFERENCE ASSHOWNTIVELIMITSIMPOSEDPENDINGREVISIONOFTECHNICAL SPECIFIATINT3THEDELTAFLUXGOINGSLIGHTLYOUTOFTHETARGETBANDBETWEEN81-2.P80DISCOVERY DESCRIPTION Q32NUCLEARSECTION80LOCATIONOFRELEASEQ8044808080NRCUSEONLY280'465-5901X-3166869PHONE.616C.E.MURPHYNAMEOFPREPARER4CONTROLROOMCOPYOFTHETECH.SPEC.GRAPHHASBEENUPDAT789FACILITY~30METHODOFSTATUS~DIPPOWEROTHERSTATUS~DISCOVERY LUO23~08IQNA~AQ31789101213444546ACTIVITYCONTENTRELEASEDOFRELEASEAMOUNTOFACTIVITYEZL~JOL~JQNA789101145PERSONNEL EXPOSURES NUMBERTYPEDESCRIPTION Q3~IN7891112LOSSOFORDAMAGETOFACILITYQ43TYPEDESCRIPTION ZQ4.NA78910PUBLICITY ISSUEDDESCRIPTION KDOMNQ4"NA78910
7        8    9        LICENSEE CODE I
~)w~h  
14 Q2OOOOOO 15
~~ATTACHMENT TOLER879-030/03L-0 PAGE2CAUSEDESCRIPTION ANDCORRECTIVE ACTIONS:ADMINISTRATIVE LIMITSANDTHEINCORE/EXCORE TESTPROCEDURE HASBEENCHANGEDTOREQUIREOPERATORSIGNOFFTHATTHEAXIALFLUXDIFFERENCE ISWITHINTHETARGETBANDPRIORTOPOWERESCALATION.  
                                                                                  ,6 LICENSE NUMBER                        25 Q3    26      LICENSE TYPE        30 Q~O 57 CAT 58 CON'T 0  1                          MLQB              O    5      O    O    O    3    1    6    Q7    O    9    O    9    7      9    QB    1      0    0    9            09 soURGE                                                                                                                74      75        REPORT DATE        80 8                        60              61              DOCKET NUMBER              68      69        F VENT DATE EVENT DESCRIPTION AND PROBABL.E CONSEQUENCES                                   Q10
~~'ve'e<~+lt}}
~02,               AFTER COMPLETION OF INCORE EXCORE CROSS CALI RAT
~03                POWER WAS                BEING ESCALATED TO 100%.                           ON    REACHING"81% POWER THE DELTA FLUX INDICA-TION        WAS OUT OF THE TARGET BAND FOR                                  AN'.ESTIMATED           21-22 MINUTES.                   TH
~OS                 TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION                               LIMIT OF 84%'BUT VIOLATES                        A MORE RESTRICTIVE ADMINISTRATIV
~06                LIMIT OF              81% IMPOSED PENDING REVISION OF TECHNICAL                                            P        F
~07
~OB                                                                                                                                                                                      80 7        8 SYSTEM              CAUSE          CAUSE                                                          COMP.          VALVE CODE                CODE        SUBCODE                  COMPONENT CODE                      SUBCODE          SUBCODE
~09                                  ~XX            Q11          D Q12      ~1Q13 13 Z    Z    Z    Z    Z    Z 18 QE        ~ZQEE 19
                                                                                                                                                              ~Z 20 QER 7        8                          9            10            11            12 SEQUENTIAL                          OCCURRENCE             REPORT                      REVISION Q17 LF RIRO REPORT EVENT YEAR
                                        ~79                     ~                 REPORT NO.
                                                                                ~QQ CODE                TYPE                          NO.
21          22          23            24            26        27            28        29          30              31          32 ATTACHMENT            NPRDQ          PRIME COMP.            COMPONENT Q26>>>>
ACTION FUTURE                        EFFECT          SHUTDOWN TAKEN ACTION                        ON PLANT            METHOD                  HOURS Q22          SUBMITTED          FORM SUB.         SUPPLIER            MANUFACTURER
                ~GQ)B 33
                            ~Z Q19, ~Z 34                    35 Q20        MZ 36 Q21 37                    40
                                                                                                                    ~Y 41 Q23        I~I 42 Q24        L~ J 43              44            47 Q"
CAUSE DESCRIPTION AND CORRECTIVE ACTIONS Q27 o            THE OPERATOR                      WHILE PERFORMING THE                    P AXIAL FLUX LIMITS DIFFERENCE AS                                      SHOWN TIVE LIMITS IMPOSED PENDING REVISION OF TECHNICAL SPECIFI ATI                                                                    N      T 3            THE DELTA FLUX GOING SLIGHTLY OUT OF THE TARGET BAND BETWEEN                                                                  81- 2.         P 4            CONTROL ROOM COPY OF THE TECH. SPEC.                                           GRAPH HAS BEEN UPDAT 80 7        8    9 FACILITY STATUS    ~
                                ~08 DIP POWER                        OTHER STATUS      ~
                                                                                        ~30      METHOD OF DISCOVERY                                DISCOVERY DESCRIPTION Q32 7      8 LUO23 9                10 I
12 Q    13 NA 44
                                                                                                    ~AQ31 45          46 NUCLEAR SECTION 80 ACTIVITY        CONTENT RELEASED OF RELEASE                              AMOUNT OF ACTIVITY                                                          LOCATION OF RELEASE          Q EZ 7      8 L~JO 9
L~JQ 10              11 NA 44            45                                                                            80 PERSONNEL EXPOSURES NUMBER                  TYPE          DESCRIPTION    Q3 80 8    9                  11        12
                                                                                                                        ~IN                                                            80 7
LOSS OF OR DAMAGE TO FACILITY TYPE        DESCRIPTION                        Q43 Z  Q4.                             NA 8    9          10                                                                                                                                                            80 7
PUBLICITY                                                                                                                                        NRC USE ONLY ISSUED      DESCRIPTION KDO MNQ4"                                           NA 68    69                        80' 2
7        8    9          10 C. E. MURPHY                                              PHONE.            61 6      465-5901      X-316 NAME OF PREPARER
 
      ~ )
w ~
h
 
    ~ ~
ATTACHMENT TO LER 8 79-030/03L-0 PAGE 2 CAUSE DESCRIPTION AND CORRECTIVE ACTIONS:
ADMINISTRATIVE LIMITS AND THE INCORE/EXCORE TEST PROCEDURE HAS BEEN CHANGED TO REQUIRE OPERATOR SIGNOFF THAT THE AXIAL FLUX DIFFERENCE IS WITHIN THE TARGET BAND PRIOR TO POWER ESCALATION.
 
    ~ ~
v e'e <
              ~
                +
t l}}

Latest revision as of 01:10, 4 February 2020

LER 79-030/03L-0:on 790909,while at 81% Power,Delta Flux Indication Was Below Tech Spec Limit.Caused by Operator Error.Procedures Have Been Revised
ML17326A283
Person / Time
Site: Cook American Electric Power icon.png
Issue date: 10/09/1979
From: Murphy C
INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER CO.
To:
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
Shared Package
ML17318A334 List:
References
LER-79-030-03L-01, LER-79-30-3L-1, NUDOCS 7910160507
Download: ML17326A283 (4)


Text

NRC FORM 366 U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION (7.77)

P ~ ENSEE EVE NT REPORT CONTROL BLOCK: QI tPLEASE PRINT OR TYPE ALL REQUIRED INFORMATION)

[OO~]

7 8 9 LICENSEE CODE I

14 Q2OOOOOO 15

,6 LICENSE NUMBER 25 Q3 26 LICENSE TYPE 30 Q~O 57 CAT 58 CON'T 0 1 MLQB O 5 O O O 3 1 6 Q7 O 9 O 9 7 9 QB 1 0 0 9 09 soURGE 74 75 REPORT DATE 80 8 60 61 DOCKET NUMBER 68 69 F VENT DATE EVENT DESCRIPTION AND PROBABL.E CONSEQUENCES Q10

~02, AFTER COMPLETION OF INCORE EXCORE CROSS CALI RAT

~03 POWER WAS BEING ESCALATED TO 100%. ON REACHING"81% POWER THE DELTA FLUX INDICA-TION WAS OUT OF THE TARGET BAND FOR AN'.ESTIMATED 21-22 MINUTES. TH

~OS TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION LIMIT OF 84%'BUT VIOLATES A MORE RESTRICTIVE ADMINISTRATIV

~06 LIMIT OF 81% IMPOSED PENDING REVISION OF TECHNICAL P F

~07

~OB 80 7 8 SYSTEM CAUSE CAUSE COMP. VALVE CODE CODE SUBCODE COMPONENT CODE SUBCODE SUBCODE

~09 ~XX Q11 D Q12 ~1Q13 13 Z Z Z Z Z Z 18 QE ~ZQEE 19

~Z 20 QER 7 8 9 10 11 12 SEQUENTIAL OCCURRENCE REPORT REVISION Q17 LF RIRO REPORT EVENT YEAR

~79 ~ REPORT NO.

~QQ CODE TYPE NO.

21 22 23 24 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 ATTACHMENT NPRDQ PRIME COMP. COMPONENT Q26>>>>

ACTION FUTURE EFFECT SHUTDOWN TAKEN ACTION ON PLANT METHOD HOURS Q22 SUBMITTED FORM SUB. SUPPLIER MANUFACTURER

~GQ)B 33

~Z Q19, ~Z 34 35 Q20 MZ 36 Q21 37 40

~Y 41 Q23 I~I 42 Q24 L~ J 43 44 47 Q"

CAUSE DESCRIPTION AND CORRECTIVE ACTIONS Q27 o THE OPERATOR WHILE PERFORMING THE P AXIAL FLUX LIMITS DIFFERENCE AS SHOWN TIVE LIMITS IMPOSED PENDING REVISION OF TECHNICAL SPECIFI ATI N T 3 THE DELTA FLUX GOING SLIGHTLY OUT OF THE TARGET BAND BETWEEN 81- 2. P 4 CONTROL ROOM COPY OF THE TECH. SPEC. GRAPH HAS BEEN UPDAT 80 7 8 9 FACILITY STATUS ~

~08 DIP POWER OTHER STATUS ~

~30 METHOD OF DISCOVERY DISCOVERY DESCRIPTION Q32 7 8 LUO23 9 10 I

12 Q 13 NA 44

~AQ31 45 46 NUCLEAR SECTION 80 ACTIVITY CONTENT RELEASED OF RELEASE AMOUNT OF ACTIVITY LOCATION OF RELEASE Q EZ 7 8 L~JO 9

L~JQ 10 11 NA 44 45 80 PERSONNEL EXPOSURES NUMBER TYPE DESCRIPTION Q3 80 8 9 11 12

~IN 80 7

LOSS OF OR DAMAGE TO FACILITY TYPE DESCRIPTION Q43 Z Q4. NA 8 9 10 80 7

PUBLICITY NRC USE ONLY ISSUED DESCRIPTION KDO MNQ4" NA 68 69 80' 2

7 8 9 10 C. E. MURPHY PHONE. 61 6 465-5901 X-316 NAME OF PREPARER

~ )

w ~

h

~ ~

ATTACHMENT TO LER 8 79-030/03L-0 PAGE 2 CAUSE DESCRIPTION AND CORRECTIVE ACTIONS:

ADMINISTRATIVE LIMITS AND THE INCORE/EXCORE TEST PROCEDURE HAS BEEN CHANGED TO REQUIRE OPERATOR SIGNOFF THAT THE AXIAL FLUX DIFFERENCE IS WITHIN THE TARGET BAND PRIOR TO POWER ESCALATION.

~ ~

v e'e <

~

+

t l