05000316/LER-1979-030-03, /03L-0:on 790909,while at 81% Power,Delta Flux Indication Was Below Tech Spec Limit.Caused by Operator Error.Procedures Have Been Revised

From kanterella
(Redirected from ML17326A283)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
/03L-0:on 790909,while at 81% Power,Delta Flux Indication Was Below Tech Spec Limit.Caused by Operator Error.Procedures Have Been Revised
ML17326A283
Person / Time
Site: Cook 
Issue date: 10/09/1979
From: Murphy C
INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER CO.
To:
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
Shared Package
ML17318A334 List:
References
LER-79-030-03L-01, LER-79-30-3L-1, NUDOCS 7910160507
Download: ML17326A283 (4)


LER-1979-030, /03L-0:on 790909,while at 81% Power,Delta Flux Indication Was Below Tech Spec Limit.Caused by Operator Error.Procedures Have Been Revised
Event date:
Report date:
3161979030R03 - NRC Website

text

U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION NT REPORT tPLEASE PRINT OR TYPE ALLREQUIRED INFORMATION)

NRC FORM 366 (7.77)

P

~

CONTROL BLOCK:

ENSEE EVE QI 3

Q~O 25 26 LICENSE TYPE 30 57 CAT 58 Q

09 80 I

,6 [OO~]

Q2OOOOOO 7

8 9

LICENSEE CODE 14 15 LICENSE NUMBER CON'T 0

1 soURGE MLQB O

5 O

O O

3 1

6 Q7 O

9 O

9 7

9 QB 1

0 0

9 8

60 61 DOCKET NUMBER 68 69 F VENT DATE 74 75 REPORT DATE EVENT DESCRIPTION AND PROBABL.E CONSEQUENCES Q10

~02, AFTER COMPLETION OF INCORE EXCORE CROSS CALI RAT

~03 POWER WAS BEING ESCALATED TO 100%.

ON REACHING"81% POWER THE DELTA FLUX INDICA-TION WAS OUT OF THE TARGET BAND FOR AN'.ESTIMATED 21-22 MINUTES.

TH

~OS

~06 TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION LIMIT OF 84%'BUT VIOLATES A MORE RESTRICTIVE ADMINISTRATIV LIMIT OF 81%

IMPOSED PENDING REVISION OF TECHNICAL P

F

~07

~OB 80 7

8

~09 7

8 SYSTEM

CAUSE

CAUSE COMP.

VALVE CODE CODE SUBCODE COMPONENT CODE SUBCODE SUBCODE

~XX Q11 D

Q12

~1Q13 Z

Z Z

Z Z

Z QE

~ZQEE

~Z QER 9

10 11 12 13 18 19 20 SEQUENTIAL OCCURRENCE REPORT REVISION LF RIRO EVENT YEAR REPORT NO.

CODE TYPE NO.

Q17 REPORT ~79

~

~QQ 21 22 23 24 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 ACTION FUTURE EFFECT SHUTDOWN ATTACHMENT NPRDQ PRIME COMP.

COMPONENT TAKEN ACTION ON PLANT METHOD HOURS Q22 SUBMITTED FORM SUB.

SUPPLIER MANUFACTURER

~GQ)B ~Z Q19, ~Z Q20 MZ Q21 <<<<

~Y Q23 I~IQ24 L~ JQ26>>>>

Q" 33 34 35 36 37 40 41 42 43 44 47 CAUSE DESCRIPTION AND CORRECTIVE ACTIONS Q27 o

THE OPERATOR WHILE PERFORMING THE P

AXIAL FLUX LIMITS DIFFERENCE AS SHOWN TIVE LIMITS IMPOSED PENDING REVISION OF TECHNICAL SPECIFI ATI N

T 3

THE DELTA FLUX GOING SLIGHTLY OUT OF THE TARGET BAND BETWEEN 81-2.

P 80 DISCOVERY DESCRIPTION Q32 NUCLEAR SECTION 80 LOCATIONOF RELEASE Q 80 44 80 80 80 NRC USE ONLY 2

80' 465-5901 X-316 68 69 PHONE.

61 6 C.

E.

MURPHY NAME OF PREPARER 4

CONTROL ROOM COPY OF THE TECH.

SPEC.

GRAPH HAS BEEN UPDAT 7

8 9

FACILITY

~30 METHOD OF STATUS

~

DIP POWER OTHER STATUS ~

DISCOVERY LUO23 ~08 I Q NA

~AQ31 7

8 9

10 12 13 44 45 46 ACTIVITY CONTENT RELEASED OF RELEASE AMOUNTOF ACTIVITY EZ L~JO L~JQ NA 7

8 9

10 11 45 PERSONNEL EXPOSURES NUMBER TYPE DESCRIPTION Q3

~IN 7

8 9

11 12 LOSS OF OR DAMAGETO FACILITYQ43 TYPE

DESCRIPTION

Z Q4.

NA 7

8 9

10 PUBLICITY ISSUED

DESCRIPTION

KDO MNQ4" NA 7

8 9

10

~ )

w

~

h

~

~

ATTACHMENT TO LER 8 79-030/03L-0 PAGE 2 CAUSE DESCRIPTION AND CORRECTIVE ACTIONS:

ADMINISTRATIVE LIMITS AND THE INCORE/EXCORE TEST PROCEDURE HAS BEEN CHANGED TO REQUIRE OPERATOR SIGNOFF THAT THE AXIAL FLUX DIFFERENCE IS WITHIN THE TARGET BAND PRIOR TO POWER ESCALATION.

~

~

v e'e <

~ +

l t