ML17334B712: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| issue date = 04/06/1998 | | issue date = 04/06/1998 | ||
| title = LER 98-013-00:on 980306,discovered Improper Splice Configurations for PORV Limit Switches.Caused by Inadequate Guidance in Installation Documents.Document Are Being Revised & Breakout Boots Will Be installed.W/980406 Ltr | | title = LER 98-013-00:on 980306,discovered Improper Splice Configurations for PORV Limit Switches.Caused by Inadequate Guidance in Installation Documents.Document Are Being Revised & Breakout Boots Will Be installed.W/980406 Ltr | ||
| author name = | | author name = Finissi M, Sampson J | ||
| author affiliation = INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER CO. | | author affiliation = INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER CO. | ||
| addressee name = | | addressee name = | ||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:CATEGORY 1y REGULATORY INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (RIDS)ACCESSION NBR:9804130248 DOC.DATE: 98/04/06 NOTARIZED: | {{#Wiki_filter:CATEGORY 1y REGULATORY INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (RIDS) | ||
NO | ACCESSION NBR:9804130248 DOC.DATE: 98/04/06 NOTARIZED: NO DOCKET 0 FACXL:50-315 Donald C. Cook Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 1, Indiana M 05000315 AUTH.N~E . AUTHOR AFFILIATION FINXSSI,M. Indiana Michigan Power Co. | ||
Indiana Michigan Power Co.SAMPSON,J.R. | SAMPSON,J.R. Indiana Michigan Power Co. | ||
Indiana Michigan Power Co.RECIP.NAME RECIPIENT AFFXLIATZON | RECIP.NAME RECIPIENT AFFXLIATZON | ||
==SUBJECT:== | ==SUBJECT:== | ||
LER 98-013-00:on 980306,discovered improper splice configurations for PORV limit switches.Caused by inadequate guidance in installation documents. | LER 98-013-00:on 980306,discovered improper splice configurations for PORV limit switches. Caused by inadequate guidance in installation documents. Document are being revised Ec breakout boots will be installed.W/980406 ltr. | ||
Document are being revised Ec breakout boots will be installed.W/980406 ltr.DISTRIBUTION CODE: IE22T COPIES RECEIVED:LTR ENCL SIZE: TITLE: 50.73/50.9 Licensee Event Report (LER), Incident Rpt, etc.NOTES: | DISTRIBUTION CODE: IE22T COPIES RECEIVED:LTR ENCL SIZE: | ||
TITLE: 50.73/50.9 Licensee Event Report (LER), Incident Rpt, etc. E NOTES: | |||
PLEASE HELP US TO REDUCE WASTE.TO HAVE YOUR NAME OR ORGANIZATION REMOVED FROM DISTRIBUTION LISTS OR REDUCE THE NUMBER OF COPIES RECEIVED BY YOU OR YOUR ORGANIZATION, CONTACT THE DOCUMENT CONTROL DESK (DCD)ON EXTENSION 415-2083 FULL TEXT CONVERSXON REQUIRED TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED: LTTR 24 ENCL 24 Indiana Michigan Power Company CcuNcc ear P~zc!Or.e Cxk Pzce Bagman.Ml 490C6 INDIANA NICHIGAItI POWER April 6, 1998 United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555 Operating Licenses DPR-58 Docket No.50-315 Document Control Manager: d Ihh' | RECIPIENT COPIES RECIPIENT COPIES ID CODE/NAME LTTR ENCL ID CODE/NAME LTTR ENCL PD3-3 PD 1 1 STANG, J 1 1 INTERNAL: 2 2 AEOD/S PD/RRAB 1 1 Y ZLE 1 1, NRR/DE/ECGB 1 1 EELB 1 1 NRR/DE/EMEB 1 1 NRR/DRCH/HHFB. 1 1 NRR/DRCH/HICB 1 1 NRR/DRCH/HOLB 1 1 NRR/DRCH/HQMB 1 "1 NRR/DRPM/PECB 1 1 NRR/DSSA/SPLB .1 1 NRR/DSSA/SRXB 1 1 RES/DET/EXB '1 1 RGN3 FILE 01 1 1 EXTERNAL: L ST LOBBY WARD 1 1 LITCO BRYCE,J H 1 1 NOAC POORE,W. ' () | ||
1 NOAC QUEENER,DS 1 1 NRC PDR 1 1 NUDOCS FULL TXT 1 1 U | |||
NOTE TO ALL "RIDS" RECIPIENTS: | |||
PLEASE HELP US TO REDUCE WASTE. TO HAVE YOUR NAME OR ORGANIZATION REMOVED FROM DISTRIBUTION LISTS OR REDUCE THE NUMBER OF COPIES RECEIVED BY YOU OR YOUR ORGANIZATION, CONTACT THE DOCUMENT CONTROL DESK (DCD) ON EXTENSION 415-2083 FULL TEXT CONVERSXON REQUIRED TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED: LTTR 24 ENCL 24 | |||
Inspection of the PORV limit switches for Unit 2 identified that although the breakout boot was installed, a problem with the length of the splice overlap existed at a different splice location.This discrepancy resulted in the valves being declared inoperable, and an update to the original notiTication was made on March 7, 1998, at 0615 hours EST.This LER is therefore submitted in accordance with 10CFR50.72(a)(2)(ii) for both units.The root cause for the lack of breakout boots was determined to be inadequate guidance in the installation documents. | |||
These documents are currently being revised, and once the revisions are complete, the breakout boots will be installed. | Indiana Michigan Power Company CcuNcc ear P~zc! | ||
The root cause for the improper splice overlap length is still under investigation. | Or.e Cxk Pzce Bagman. Ml 490C6 INDIANA NICHIGAItI POWER April 6, 1998 United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555 Operating Licenses DPR-58 Docket No. 50-315 | ||
An evaluation of the existing configurations was performed. | ~h Document Control Manager: | ||
It was determined that although the installed configuration did not meet the EQ requirements, the configuration used would have functioned adequately during accident and post-accident conditions. | d Ihh ' | ||
It is therefore concluded that the event had minimal safety significance and the health and safety of the public were not endangered. | Ill lg 0 bllhdbpldgdh 1 big b lgd.'8-013-00 | ||
: 0. did~i Sincerely, J. R. Sampson Site Vice President Imbd Attachment A. B. Beach, Region III E. E. Fitzpatrick P. A. Barrett S. J. Brewer R. Whale D. Hahn Records Center, INPO NRC Resident Inspector 9804130248 980406 PDR ADOCK 05000315 PDR | |||
HRC FORH 366 . NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION ROVED BY OMB NO. 3150-0104 (5-92) EXPIRES 5/31/95 ESTIMATED BURDEN PER RESPONSE TO COHPLY IIITH THI INFORMATION COLLECTION REQUEST: 50.0 HRS. | |||
LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER) COMMENTS REGARDING BURDEH ESTIMATE TO FORVAR TH INFORMATION AND RECORDS MANAGEMENT BRANCH (MNB 7714), U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION, WASHINGTON, DC 20555.0001, AND TO THE PAPERNOR REDUCTION PROJECT (3150-0104), OFFICE 0 MAHAGEHENT AND BUDGET 'WASHINGTON DC 20503. | |||
FACILITY HAME (1) DOCKET NUMBER (2) of4 Page 1 Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant - Unit 1 50.315 TITLE (4) | |||
Improper Splice Configurations for Power Operated Relief Valve Limit Switches Results in Unanalyzed Condition EVENT DATE 5 LER NUMBER 6 REPORT DATE 7 O'THER FACILITIES INVOLVED 8 SEQUENTIAL REVI S ION FACILIT'Y NAHE DOCKET NUMBER MONTH DAY YEAR YEAR HONTM DAY NUHBER NUMBER Cook Unit 2 50-316 FACILITY HAHE DOCKET NUHBER 03 06 98 98 013 00 04 06 OPERATING TH S REPORT IS SUBMITTED PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF 10 CFR Check one or more 11 MODE (9) 20.2201(b) 20.2203(a)(3)(s) 50 '3(a)(2)(iii) 73.71 (b) | |||
PONER 0 | |||
20.2203 a 20.2203 a 3 ii 50.73 a 2 iv 73.71o LEVEL (10) 20.2203(a)(2)(i) 20.2203(a)(4) 50.73(a)(2)(v) OTHER 20.2203 a 2 ii 50.36 c 1 50.73 a 2 vii (Specify in 20.2203(a)(2)(iii) 50.36(c)(2) 50.73(a)(2)(vfii)(A) Abstract beloM 20.2203(a)(2)(iv) 50.73(a)(2)(i) 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B) and in Text, NRC Form 366A) 20.2203(a)(2)(v) X 50.73(a)(2)(ii) 50.73(a)(2)(x) | |||
LICENSEE CONTAC1'OR THIS LER 12 NAME TELEPHONE NUMBER (Include Area Code) | |||
Mr. Mike Finissi, Electrical Systems Manager 616/465-5901, x2830 COMPL ETE ONE LINE FOR EACH COMPONEHT FA LURE DESCR ISED IN T NIS REPORT REPORTABLE REPORTABLE CAUSE SYSTEM COMPONENT MANUFACTURER CAUSE SYSTEM COMPOHENT MANUFACTURER TO HPRDS TO NPRDS SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT EXPECTED 14 HONTH DAY YEAR EXPECTED'UBMISSIOH YES X (If yes, complete EXPECTED SUBMISSION DAlE). NO DATE (15) 04 17 98 ABSTRACT (Limit to 1400 spaces, i.e., approximately 15 single-spaced typewritten lines) (16) | |||
On March 61998, with Unit 1 and 2 in cold shutdown, it was determined that the splices for the limit switches on the Unit 1 Power Operated Relief Valves (PORVs) were installed without the "breakout boot required for Environmental Qualification (EQ). The valves were declared inoperable, and an ENS notification was made at 1829 hours EST under 10CFR50.72(a)(2)(i) for an unanalyzed condition. Inspection of the PORV limit switches for Unit 2 identified that although the breakout boot was installed, a problem with the length of the splice overlap existed at a different splice location. This discrepancy resulted in the valves being declared inoperable, and an update to the original notiTication was made on March 7, 1998, at 0615 hours EST. This LER is therefore submitted in accordance with 10CFR50.72(a)(2)(ii) for both units. | |||
The root cause for the lack of breakout boots was determined to be inadequate guidance in the installation documents. These documents are currently being revised, and once the revisions are complete, the breakout boots will be installed. The root cause for the improper splice overlap length is still under investigation. | |||
An evaluation of the existing configurations was performed. It was determined that although the installed configuration did not meet the EQ requirements, the configuration used would have functioned adequately during accident and post-accident conditions. It is therefore concluded that the event had minimal safety significance and the health and safety of the public were not endangered. | |||
An update to this LER is expected to be submitted by April 17, 1998. | An update to this LER is expected to be submitted by April 17, 1998. | ||
HRC FORM 366A.HUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION | |||
It was decided that a walkdown of the Unit 1 PORVs should be performed to confirm the installed configuration. | HRC FORM 366A . HUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION ROVED BY OMB NO. 3150 0104 EXPIRES 5/31/95 ESTIMATED BURDEN PER RESPONSE TO COMPLY WITH THIS INFORMATION COLLECTIOH REQUEST: 50 ' HRS. | ||
The walkdown revealed that a single Raychem splice was used for 1-NRV-152 and 1-NRV-153 instead of the required EQ"breakout boot" as described in DCC Specification DCC-PS@30-QCN. | LICENSEE EVENT CONTINUATION FORWARD COMMENTS REGARDING BURDEH ESTIMATE'TO THE INFORMATION AHD RECORDS MANAGEMENT BRANCH (MHBB 7714), U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION, | ||
A breakout boot is used to splice a pair of leads to a single field cable, and physically resembles the letter | 'WASHIHGTOH, DC 20555-0001, AHD TO THE PAPERWORK REDUCTION PROJECT (3150-0104), OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET WASHINGTON DC 20503. | ||
The valves were subsequently declared inoperable. | FACILITY NAME 1 DOCKET NUMBER 2 LER NUMBER 6 PAGE 3 YEAR SEQUEHT IAL REVI SION Cook Nuclear Plant - Unit 1 50-315 98 013 00 2 OF 4 TEXT (if core space is required. use additional NRC Forrs 366A's) <17) | ||
A walkdown of the Unit 2 PORVs was conducted early on March 7, 1998.This walkdown revealed that the breakout boots were properly installed, however, the Raychem splices for a different splice of a single conductor to another single conductor did not have the EQ required overlap length of 2 inches.These valves, 2-NRV-151, 2-NRV-152 and 2-NRV-153, were also declared inoperable. | C di n riort E e Unit 1 was in Mode 5, Cold Shutdown Unit 2 was in Mode 5, Cold Shutdown On March 6, 1998, while planning a job order on the Unit 1 Power Operated Relief Valves (PORVs), a potential discrepancy was noted between actual installation configuration and the required Environmental Qualification (EQ) configuration. It was decided that a walkdown of the Unit 1 PORVs should be performed to confirm the installed configuration. | ||
Subsequent to the discovery of the problems with the PORVs, the lack of a breakout boot was also identified on the splices for 1-NSO-21 and 1-NSO-22, the Unit 1 reactor vessel head vent valves.j The root cause of this event v7as inadequate written guidance for the installation of the required EQ breakout boot splices.The splices are to be installed in accordance with the Electrical Design Standard (EDS)for the particular installation. | The walkdown revealed that a single Raychem splice was used for 1-NRV-152 and 1-NRV-153 instead of the required EQ "breakout boot" as described in DCC Specification DCC-PS@30-QCN. A breakout boot is used to splice "Y" or a pair of pants. It could not be a pair of leads to a single field cable, and physically resembles the letter determined when the improper splices were installed, but it was conservatively assumed that the improper splices had been installed while the unit was operating. The valves were subsequently declared inoperable. | ||
In the case of the PORVs, EDS 335 contains illustrated installation details for the limit switches themselves and includes a reference to DCC Specification DCC-PS430-QCN for the actual splice configuration. | A walkdown of the Unit 2 PORVs was conducted early on March 7, 1998. This walkdown revealed that the breakout boots were properly installed, however, the Raychem splices for a different splice of a single conductor to another single conductor did not have the EQ required overlap length of 2 inches. These valves, 2-NRV-151, 2-NRV-152 and 2-NRV-153, were also declared inoperable. | ||
DCC-PS%30-QCN describes the process for assembling a qualified splice, but does not contain any illustration to assist in that assembly.The root cause for the improper splice overlap lengths for the Unit 2 PORVs is still under investigation. | Subsequent to the discovery of the problems with the PORVs, the lack of a breakout boot was also identified on the splices for 1-NSO-21 and 1-NSO-22, the Unit 1 reactor vessel head vent valves. | ||
The investigation is expected to be complete by April 13, 1998.This event was reported via ENS on March 6, 1998 in accordance with 10CFR50.72(a)(2)(i), as an unanalyzed condition on Unit 1.The notification was updated on March 7, 1998 to include the Unit 2 PORVs.This LER is therefore submitted in accordance with 10CFR50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B), as an event which was found while shutdown, which if found while the reactor was operating, would have constituted an unanalyzed condition. | j The root cause of this event v7as inadequate written guidance for the installation of the required EQ breakout boot splices. The splices are to be installed in accordance with the Electrical Design Standard (EDS) for the particular installation. In the case of the PORVs, EDS 335 contains illustrated installation details for the limit switches themselves and includes a reference to DCC Specification DCC-PS430-QCN for the actual splice configuration. | ||
NRC FORM 366A~NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSIOH | DCC-PS%30-QCN describes the process for assembling a qualified splice, but does not contain any illustration to assist in that assembly. | ||
WASHINGTOH, DC 20555-0001, AHD TO THE PAPERWORK REDUCTIOH PROJECT (3150 0104), OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET WASHINGTON DC 20503.FACILITY NAHE 1 Cook Nuclear Plant-Unit 1 TEXT (if acre space is required.use additional NRC Fom 366A's)(IT) | The root cause for the improper splice overlap lengths for the Unit 2 PORVs is still under investigation. The investigation is expected to be complete by April 13, 1998. | ||
The first issue addressed was the lack of a breakout boot for the single conductor to two conductor splice.The breakout boot is designed to provide a seal where the two conductors leave the single conductor. | This event was reported via ENS on March 6, 1998 in accordance with 10CFR50.72(a)(2)(i), as an unanalyzed condition on Unit 1. The notification was updated on March 7, 1998 to include the Unit 2 PORVs. This LER is therefore submitted in accordance with 10CFR50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B), as an event which was found while shutdown, which if found while the reactor was operating, would have constituted an unanalyzed condition. | ||
Raychem had qualified the breakout boots for installations exposed to direct steam impingement. | |||
Instead of using a breakout boot for the 1-NRV-152 and 1-NRV-153 applications, each of the three individual conductors were insulated with Raychem WCSF heat shrink tubing.Then the entire assembly was covered with a piece of the same tubing.Raychem manufactures the WCSF tubing with a pre-coated adhesive whose function is to provide an environmental seal for isolating the active electrical component from moisture.The entire WCSF sleeve is then heat shrunk to seal against the conductor. | NRC FORM 366A ~ NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSIOH ROVED BY OMB NO. 3150.0104 EXPIRES 5/31/95 ESTIMATED BURDEN PER RESPONSE TO COMPLY WITH THIS IHFORHATIOH COLLECTION REQUEST: 50.0 MRS. | ||
The adhesive flows to conform to the shape of the conductor. | LICENSEE EVENT CONTINUATION FORWARD COMMENTS REGARDING BURDEN ESTIMATE TO THE INFORMATION AND RECORDS MANAGEMENT BRANCH (MNBB 7714), U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION/ | ||
For this particular installation, it also flowed between the two conductors to provide the sealing function normally performed by the breakout boot..The primary failure mechanism to be considered is moisture collection inside the Raychem splice on the conductor to form a low resistance path to ground.The possibility of a short circuit is a function of the length of this path, the circuit voltage and the resistance of the path.In order to develop a low resistance path to ground it would be necessary for moisture to penetrate the Raychem splice underneath the outer tubing.While a qualified assembly would have a breakout boot,'an analysis of the existing configuration shows that it also would provide protection from moisture intrusion. | WASHINGTOH, DC 20555-0001, AHD TO THE PAPERWORK REDUCTIOH PROJECT (3150 0104), OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET WASHINGTON DC 20503. | ||
The breakout boot was qualified against direct spray impingement on the splice for a 1000 volt circuit.For the existing configuration in a 250 volt DC circuit, protection against direct steam impingement is not required as these splices are located inside terminal boxes.Without direct spray impingement, it is considered unlikely that moisture would penetrated the installed splice configuration, and the physical creep distance requirements for the 250 volt DC circuit are less than required for a 1000 volt circuit.The second issue considered was that of the proper size of overlap for Raychem WCSF-N material used for conductor to conductor splices.The current Raychem installation practices requires that for a Loss of Coolant Accident (LOCA)application, the WCSF tubing is 6 inches long in order to provide 2 inches of overlap.This 2 inch length was chosen by Raychem to insure successful completion of the LOCA testing for 1000 volt applications directly exposed to steam.However, varieties of overlap lengths, some as short as one eight inch have been acceptably qualified by industry testing.The Nuclear Utility Group on Equipment Qualification prepared a report on industry testing of short Raychem splices, which was issued on May 22, 1987, and is the basis for the industry acceptance of the shorter Raychem splice.At this time these tests are under review so that a direct comparison can be made of the test parameters versus the accident profile for Cook.Additionally, as with the quaiifiied breakout boot configuration, the application for which the shorter splice length exists is a 250 vDC circuit installed inside terminal boxes, as opposed to the tested 1000 volt configuration exposed to direct steam impingement. | FACILITY NAHE 1 DOCKET NUMBER 2 LER NUMBER 6 PAGE 3 Cook Nuclear Plant - Unit 1 TEXT (if acre space is required. use additional NRC Fom 366A's) (IT) 50-315 YEAR 98 SEQUENTIAL 013 '0REVISION 3OF4 na I ve cont'd An Engineering evaluation of the installed configurations was performed. The first issue addressed was the lack of a breakout boot for the single conductor to two conductor splice. The breakout boot is designed to provide a seal where the two conductors leave the single conductor. Raychem had qualified the breakout boots for installations exposed to direct steam impingement. Instead of using a breakout boot for the 1-NRV-152 and 1-NRV-153 applications, each of the three individual conductors were insulated with Raychem WCSF heat shrink tubing. Then the entire assembly was covered with a piece of the same tubing. Raychem manufactures the WCSF tubing with a pre-coated adhesive whose function is to provide an environmental seal for isolating the active electrical component from moisture. The entire WCSF sleeve is then heat shrunk to seal against the conductor. The adhesive flows to conform to the shape of the conductor. For this particular installation, it also flowed between the two conductors to provide the sealing function normally performed by the breakout boot. | ||
In conclusion, it was determined that although the installed splices do not meet the EQ requirements for breakout boot and splice, overlap length, it is considered likely that the installed configuration would have performed adequately in a LOCA or post-LOCA environment. | . The primary failure mechanism to be considered is moisture collection inside the Raychem splice on the conductor to form a low resistance path to ground. The possibility of a short circuit is a function of the length of this path, the circuit voltage and the resistance of the path. In order to develop a low resistance path to ground it would be necessary for moisture to penetrate the Raychem splice underneath the outer tubing. While a qualified assembly would have a breakout boot, 'an analysis of the existing configuration shows that it also would provide protection from moisture intrusion. | ||
Therefore, this event is considered to be of minimal safety significance as the health and safety of the public was not jeopardized. | The breakout boot was qualified against direct spray impingement on the splice for a 1000 volt circuit. For the existing configuration in a 250 volt DC circuit, protection against direct steam impingement is not required as these splices are located inside terminal boxes. Without direct spray impingement, it is considered unlikely that moisture would penetrated the installed splice configuration, and the physical creep distance requirements for the 250 volt DC circuit are less than required for a 1000 volt circuit. | ||
HRC FORM 366A.NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMHISSIOH | The second issue considered was that of the proper size of overlap for Raychem WCSF-N material used for conductor to conductor splices. The current Raychem installation practices requires that for a Loss of Coolant Accident (LOCA) application, the WCSF tubing is 6 inches long in order to provide 2 inches of overlap. This 2 inch length was chosen by Raychem to insure successful completion of the LOCA testing for 1000 volt applications directly exposed to steam. However, varieties of overlap lengths, some as short as one eight inch have been acceptably qualified by industry testing. The Nuclear Utility Group on Equipment Qualification prepared a report on industry testing of short Raychem splices, which was issued on May 22, 1987, and is the basis for the industry acceptance of the shorter Raychem splice. At this time these tests are under review so that a direct comparison can be made of the test parameters versus the accident profile for Cook. | ||
EDS 620 will illustrate the required configuration for a multiple cable splice using the breakout boot.Once these revisions are completed, the breakout boots will be installed in accordance with the EDS.Action requests have already been prepared for installation of the breakout boots on both the affected PORVs and reactor vessel head vent valves.Corrective actions will be taken as appropriate for the splice overlap length problem once the root cause has been determined. | Additionally, as with the quaiifiied breakout boot configuration, the application for which the shorter splice length exists is a 250 vDC circuit installed inside terminal boxes, as opposed to the tested 1000 volt configuration exposed to direct steam impingement. | ||
This LER will be updated at that time to reflect those actions.In response to a number of EQ discrepancies that have been identified during the restart readiness reviews currently underway, a Project Team has been assembled to assess the EQ process.This team is composed of members from EQ and Design Engineering, Maintenance Training, Maintenance Planning and Maintenance procedure writers, Quality Control, and Procurement. | In conclusion, it was determined that although the installed splices do not meet the EQ requirements for breakout boot and splice, overlap length, it is considered likely that the installed configuration would have performed adequately in a LOCA or post-LOCA environment. Therefore, this event is considered to be of minimal safety significance as the health and safety of the public was not jeopardized. | ||
The team will review and assess the EQ process for adequate knowledge and training on installation practices for each discipline. | |||
The amount, content and frequency of training given to each discipline will be evaluated, as will the documents used for installation. | HRC FORM 366A . NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMHISSIOH OVED BY OMB NO. 3150-0104 EXP I RES 5/31/95 ESTIMATED BURDEN PER RESPONSE TO COHPLY WITH THIS INFORMATION COLLECTION REOUESTs 50.0 HRS. | ||
The team is expected to complete their charter within 6 months, and appropriate actions will be taken to implement solutions | LICENSEE EVENT CONTINUATION FORWARD COMMENTS REGARDING BURDEN ESTIMATE TO THE IHFORHATIOH AND RECORDS MANAGEHENT BRANCH (MNBB 7714), U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMHISSION, liASHIHGTOH, DC 20555-0001, AND TO THE PAPERWORK REDUCTION PROJECT (3150-0104), OFFICE OF HANAGEMEHT AND BUDGET IJASHINGTON DC 20503. | ||
FACILITY NAME 1 DOCKET NUHBER 2 LER NUMBER 6 PAGE 3 YEAR SEQUENTIAL REVISION Cook Nuclear Plant - Unit 1 50-315 98 013 00 4OF4 | |||
, 316/97-00640 | ~* | ||
TEXT (ir nore space is required. use additional NRC Fora 366A's) (17) | |||
EDS 335 will be revised to reference EDS 620, instead of the DCC Specification. EDS 620 will illustrate the required configuration for a multiple cable splice using the breakout boot. Once these revisions are completed, the breakout boots will be installed in accordance with the EDS. Action requests have already been prepared for installation of the breakout boots on both the affected PORVs and reactor vessel head vent valves. | |||
Corrective actions will be taken as appropriate for the splice overlap length problem once the root cause has been determined. This LER will be updated at that time to reflect those actions. | |||
In response to a number of EQ discrepancies that have been identified during the restart readiness reviews currently underway, a Project Team has been assembled to assess the EQ process. This team is composed of members from EQ and Design Engineering, Maintenance Training, Maintenance Planning and Maintenance procedure writers, Quality Control, and Procurement. The team will review and assess the EQ process for adequate knowledge and training on installation practices for each discipline. The amount, content and frequency of training given to each discipline will be evaluated, as will the documents used for installation. The team is expected to complete their charter within 6 months, and appropriate actions will be taken to implement solutions to the problems they identify. | |||
This information will be provided to the NRC once the long term actions have been determined. | |||
ifi on Not Applicable vl Ev 315/97-006-01 | |||
, 316/97-00640}} |
Latest revision as of 23:35, 3 February 2020
ML17334B712 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Cook |
Issue date: | 04/06/1998 |
From: | Finissi M, Sampson J INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER CO. |
To: | NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM) |
References | |
LER-98-013, LER-98-13, NUDOCS 9804130248 | |
Download: ML17334B712 (6) | |
Text
CATEGORY 1y REGULATORY INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (RIDS)
ACCESSION NBR:9804130248 DOC.DATE: 98/04/06 NOTARIZED: NO DOCKET 0 FACXL:50-315 Donald C. Cook Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 1, Indiana M 05000315 AUTH.N~E . AUTHOR AFFILIATION FINXSSI,M. Indiana Michigan Power Co.
SAMPSON,J.R. Indiana Michigan Power Co.
RECIP.NAME RECIPIENT AFFXLIATZON
SUBJECT:
LER 98-013-00:on 980306,discovered improper splice configurations for PORV limit switches. Caused by inadequate guidance in installation documents. Document are being revised Ec breakout boots will be installed.W/980406 ltr.
DISTRIBUTION CODE: IE22T COPIES RECEIVED:LTR ENCL SIZE:
TITLE: 50.73/50.9 Licensee Event Report (LER), Incident Rpt, etc. E NOTES:
RECIPIENT COPIES RECIPIENT COPIES ID CODE/NAME LTTR ENCL ID CODE/NAME LTTR ENCL PD3-3 PD 1 1 STANG, J 1 1 INTERNAL: 2 2 AEOD/S PD/RRAB 1 1 Y ZLE 1 1, NRR/DE/ECGB 1 1 EELB 1 1 NRR/DE/EMEB 1 1 NRR/DRCH/HHFB. 1 1 NRR/DRCH/HICB 1 1 NRR/DRCH/HOLB 1 1 NRR/DRCH/HQMB 1 "1 NRR/DRPM/PECB 1 1 NRR/DSSA/SPLB .1 1 NRR/DSSA/SRXB 1 1 RES/DET/EXB '1 1 RGN3 FILE 01 1 1 EXTERNAL: L ST LOBBY WARD 1 1 LITCO BRYCE,J H 1 1 NOAC POORE,W. ' ()
1 NOAC QUEENER,DS 1 1 NRC PDR 1 1 NUDOCS FULL TXT 1 1 U
NOTE TO ALL "RIDS" RECIPIENTS:
PLEASE HELP US TO REDUCE WASTE. TO HAVE YOUR NAME OR ORGANIZATION REMOVED FROM DISTRIBUTION LISTS OR REDUCE THE NUMBER OF COPIES RECEIVED BY YOU OR YOUR ORGANIZATION, CONTACT THE DOCUMENT CONTROL DESK (DCD) ON EXTENSION 415-2083 FULL TEXT CONVERSXON REQUIRED TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED: LTTR 24 ENCL 24
Indiana Michigan Power Company CcuNcc ear P~zc!
Or.e Cxk Pzce Bagman. Ml 490C6 INDIANA NICHIGAItI POWER April 6, 1998 United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555 Operating Licenses DPR-58 Docket No. 50-315
~h Document Control Manager:
d Ihh '
Ill lg 0 bllhdbpldgdh 1 big b lgd.'8-013-00
- 0. did~i Sincerely, J. R. Sampson Site Vice President Imbd Attachment A. B. Beach, Region III E. E. Fitzpatrick P. A. Barrett S. J. Brewer R. Whale D. Hahn Records Center, INPO NRC Resident Inspector 9804130248 980406 PDR ADOCK 05000315 PDR
HRC FORH 366 . NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION ROVED BY OMB NO. 3150-0104 (5-92) EXPIRES 5/31/95 ESTIMATED BURDEN PER RESPONSE TO COHPLY IIITH THI INFORMATION COLLECTION REQUEST: 50.0 HRS.
LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER) COMMENTS REGARDING BURDEH ESTIMATE TO FORVAR TH INFORMATION AND RECORDS MANAGEMENT BRANCH (MNB 7714), U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION, WASHINGTON, DC 20555.0001, AND TO THE PAPERNOR REDUCTION PROJECT (3150-0104), OFFICE 0 MAHAGEHENT AND BUDGET 'WASHINGTON DC 20503.
FACILITY HAME (1) DOCKET NUMBER (2) of4 Page 1 Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant - Unit 1 50.315 TITLE (4)
Improper Splice Configurations for Power Operated Relief Valve Limit Switches Results in Unanalyzed Condition EVENT DATE 5 LER NUMBER 6 REPORT DATE 7 O'THER FACILITIES INVOLVED 8 SEQUENTIAL REVI S ION FACILIT'Y NAHE DOCKET NUMBER MONTH DAY YEAR YEAR HONTM DAY NUHBER NUMBER Cook Unit 2 50-316 FACILITY HAHE DOCKET NUHBER 03 06 98 98 013 00 04 06 OPERATING TH S REPORT IS SUBMITTED PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF 10 CFR Check one or more 11 MODE (9) 20.2201(b) 20.2203(a)(3)(s) 50 '3(a)(2)(iii) 73.71 (b)
PONER 0
20.2203 a 20.2203 a 3 ii 50.73 a 2 iv 73.71o LEVEL (10) 20.2203(a)(2)(i) 20.2203(a)(4) 50.73(a)(2)(v) OTHER 20.2203 a 2 ii 50.36 c 1 50.73 a 2 vii (Specify in 20.2203(a)(2)(iii) 50.36(c)(2) 50.73(a)(2)(vfii)(A) Abstract beloM 20.2203(a)(2)(iv) 50.73(a)(2)(i) 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B) and in Text, NRC Form 366A) 20.2203(a)(2)(v) X 50.73(a)(2)(ii) 50.73(a)(2)(x)
LICENSEE CONTAC1'OR THIS LER 12 NAME TELEPHONE NUMBER (Include Area Code)
Mr. Mike Finissi, Electrical Systems Manager 616/465-5901, x2830 COMPL ETE ONE LINE FOR EACH COMPONEHT FA LURE DESCR ISED IN T NIS REPORT REPORTABLE REPORTABLE CAUSE SYSTEM COMPONENT MANUFACTURER CAUSE SYSTEM COMPOHENT MANUFACTURER TO HPRDS TO NPRDS SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT EXPECTED 14 HONTH DAY YEAR EXPECTED'UBMISSIOH YES X (If yes, complete EXPECTED SUBMISSION DAlE). NO DATE (15) 04 17 98 ABSTRACT (Limit to 1400 spaces, i.e., approximately 15 single-spaced typewritten lines) (16)
On March 61998, with Unit 1 and 2 in cold shutdown, it was determined that the splices for the limit switches on the Unit 1 Power Operated Relief Valves (PORVs) were installed without the "breakout boot required for Environmental Qualification (EQ). The valves were declared inoperable, and an ENS notification was made at 1829 hours0.0212 days <br />0.508 hours <br />0.00302 weeks <br />6.959345e-4 months <br /> EST under 10CFR50.72(a)(2)(i) for an unanalyzed condition. Inspection of the PORV limit switches for Unit 2 identified that although the breakout boot was installed, a problem with the length of the splice overlap existed at a different splice location. This discrepancy resulted in the valves being declared inoperable, and an update to the original notiTication was made on March 7, 1998, at 0615 hours0.00712 days <br />0.171 hours <br />0.00102 weeks <br />2.340075e-4 months <br /> EST. This LER is therefore submitted in accordance with 10CFR50.72(a)(2)(ii) for both units.
The root cause for the lack of breakout boots was determined to be inadequate guidance in the installation documents. These documents are currently being revised, and once the revisions are complete, the breakout boots will be installed. The root cause for the improper splice overlap length is still under investigation.
An evaluation of the existing configurations was performed. It was determined that although the installed configuration did not meet the EQ requirements, the configuration used would have functioned adequately during accident and post-accident conditions. It is therefore concluded that the event had minimal safety significance and the health and safety of the public were not endangered.
An update to this LER is expected to be submitted by April 17, 1998.
HRC FORM 366A . HUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION ROVED BY OMB NO. 3150 0104 EXPIRES 5/31/95 ESTIMATED BURDEN PER RESPONSE TO COMPLY WITH THIS INFORMATION COLLECTIOH REQUEST: 50 ' HRS.
LICENSEE EVENT CONTINUATION FORWARD COMMENTS REGARDING BURDEH ESTIMATE'TO THE INFORMATION AHD RECORDS MANAGEMENT BRANCH (MHBB 7714), U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION,
'WASHIHGTOH, DC 20555-0001, AHD TO THE PAPERWORK REDUCTION PROJECT (3150-0104), OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET WASHINGTON DC 20503.
FACILITY NAME 1 DOCKET NUMBER 2 LER NUMBER 6 PAGE 3 YEAR SEQUEHT IAL REVI SION Cook Nuclear Plant - Unit 1 50-315 98 013 00 2 OF 4 TEXT (if core space is required. use additional NRC Forrs 366A's) <17)
C di n riort E e Unit 1 was in Mode 5, Cold Shutdown Unit 2 was in Mode 5, Cold Shutdown On March 6, 1998, while planning a job order on the Unit 1 Power Operated Relief Valves (PORVs), a potential discrepancy was noted between actual installation configuration and the required Environmental Qualification (EQ) configuration. It was decided that a walkdown of the Unit 1 PORVs should be performed to confirm the installed configuration.
The walkdown revealed that a single Raychem splice was used for 1-NRV-152 and 1-NRV-153 instead of the required EQ "breakout boot" as described in DCC Specification DCC-PS@30-QCN. A breakout boot is used to splice "Y" or a pair of pants. It could not be a pair of leads to a single field cable, and physically resembles the letter determined when the improper splices were installed, but it was conservatively assumed that the improper splices had been installed while the unit was operating. The valves were subsequently declared inoperable.
A walkdown of the Unit 2 PORVs was conducted early on March 7, 1998. This walkdown revealed that the breakout boots were properly installed, however, the Raychem splices for a different splice of a single conductor to another single conductor did not have the EQ required overlap length of 2 inches. These valves, 2-NRV-151, 2-NRV-152 and 2-NRV-153, were also declared inoperable.
Subsequent to the discovery of the problems with the PORVs, the lack of a breakout boot was also identified on the splices for 1-NSO-21 and 1-NSO-22, the Unit 1 reactor vessel head vent valves.
j The root cause of this event v7as inadequate written guidance for the installation of the required EQ breakout boot splices. The splices are to be installed in accordance with the Electrical Design Standard (EDS) for the particular installation. In the case of the PORVs, EDS 335 contains illustrated installation details for the limit switches themselves and includes a reference to DCC Specification DCC-PS430-QCN for the actual splice configuration.
DCC-PS%30-QCN describes the process for assembling a qualified splice, but does not contain any illustration to assist in that assembly.
The root cause for the improper splice overlap lengths for the Unit 2 PORVs is still under investigation. The investigation is expected to be complete by April 13, 1998.
This event was reported via ENS on March 6, 1998 in accordance with 10CFR50.72(a)(2)(i), as an unanalyzed condition on Unit 1. The notification was updated on March 7, 1998 to include the Unit 2 PORVs. This LER is therefore submitted in accordance with 10CFR50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B), as an event which was found while shutdown, which if found while the reactor was operating, would have constituted an unanalyzed condition.
NRC FORM 366A ~ NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSIOH ROVED BY OMB NO. 3150.0104 EXPIRES 5/31/95 ESTIMATED BURDEN PER RESPONSE TO COMPLY WITH THIS IHFORHATIOH COLLECTION REQUEST: 50.0 MRS.
LICENSEE EVENT CONTINUATION FORWARD COMMENTS REGARDING BURDEN ESTIMATE TO THE INFORMATION AND RECORDS MANAGEMENT BRANCH (MNBB 7714), U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION/
WASHINGTOH, DC 20555-0001, AHD TO THE PAPERWORK REDUCTIOH PROJECT (3150 0104), OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET WASHINGTON DC 20503.
FACILITY NAHE 1 DOCKET NUMBER 2 LER NUMBER 6 PAGE 3 Cook Nuclear Plant - Unit 1 TEXT (if acre space is required. use additional NRC Fom 366A's) (IT) 50-315 YEAR 98 SEQUENTIAL 013 '0REVISION 3OF4 na I ve cont'd An Engineering evaluation of the installed configurations was performed. The first issue addressed was the lack of a breakout boot for the single conductor to two conductor splice. The breakout boot is designed to provide a seal where the two conductors leave the single conductor. Raychem had qualified the breakout boots for installations exposed to direct steam impingement. Instead of using a breakout boot for the 1-NRV-152 and 1-NRV-153 applications, each of the three individual conductors were insulated with Raychem WCSF heat shrink tubing. Then the entire assembly was covered with a piece of the same tubing. Raychem manufactures the WCSF tubing with a pre-coated adhesive whose function is to provide an environmental seal for isolating the active electrical component from moisture. The entire WCSF sleeve is then heat shrunk to seal against the conductor. The adhesive flows to conform to the shape of the conductor. For this particular installation, it also flowed between the two conductors to provide the sealing function normally performed by the breakout boot.
. The primary failure mechanism to be considered is moisture collection inside the Raychem splice on the conductor to form a low resistance path to ground. The possibility of a short circuit is a function of the length of this path, the circuit voltage and the resistance of the path. In order to develop a low resistance path to ground it would be necessary for moisture to penetrate the Raychem splice underneath the outer tubing. While a qualified assembly would have a breakout boot, 'an analysis of the existing configuration shows that it also would provide protection from moisture intrusion.
The breakout boot was qualified against direct spray impingement on the splice for a 1000 volt circuit. For the existing configuration in a 250 volt DC circuit, protection against direct steam impingement is not required as these splices are located inside terminal boxes. Without direct spray impingement, it is considered unlikely that moisture would penetrated the installed splice configuration, and the physical creep distance requirements for the 250 volt DC circuit are less than required for a 1000 volt circuit.
The second issue considered was that of the proper size of overlap for Raychem WCSF-N material used for conductor to conductor splices. The current Raychem installation practices requires that for a Loss of Coolant Accident (LOCA) application, the WCSF tubing is 6 inches long in order to provide 2 inches of overlap. This 2 inch length was chosen by Raychem to insure successful completion of the LOCA testing for 1000 volt applications directly exposed to steam. However, varieties of overlap lengths, some as short as one eight inch have been acceptably qualified by industry testing. The Nuclear Utility Group on Equipment Qualification prepared a report on industry testing of short Raychem splices, which was issued on May 22, 1987, and is the basis for the industry acceptance of the shorter Raychem splice. At this time these tests are under review so that a direct comparison can be made of the test parameters versus the accident profile for Cook.
Additionally, as with the quaiifiied breakout boot configuration, the application for which the shorter splice length exists is a 250 vDC circuit installed inside terminal boxes, as opposed to the tested 1000 volt configuration exposed to direct steam impingement.
In conclusion, it was determined that although the installed splices do not meet the EQ requirements for breakout boot and splice, overlap length, it is considered likely that the installed configuration would have performed adequately in a LOCA or post-LOCA environment. Therefore, this event is considered to be of minimal safety significance as the health and safety of the public was not jeopardized.
HRC FORM 366A . NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMHISSIOH OVED BY OMB NO. 3150-0104 EXP I RES 5/31/95 ESTIMATED BURDEN PER RESPONSE TO COHPLY WITH THIS INFORMATION COLLECTION REOUESTs 50.0 HRS.
LICENSEE EVENT CONTINUATION FORWARD COMMENTS REGARDING BURDEN ESTIMATE TO THE IHFORHATIOH AND RECORDS MANAGEHENT BRANCH (MNBB 7714), U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMHISSION, liASHIHGTOH, DC 20555-0001, AND TO THE PAPERWORK REDUCTION PROJECT (3150-0104), OFFICE OF HANAGEMEHT AND BUDGET IJASHINGTON DC 20503.
FACILITY NAME 1 DOCKET NUHBER 2 LER NUMBER 6 PAGE 3 YEAR SEQUENTIAL REVISION Cook Nuclear Plant - Unit 1 50-315 98 013 00 4OF4
~*
TEXT (ir nore space is required. use additional NRC Fora 366A's) (17)
EDS 335 will be revised to reference EDS 620, instead of the DCC Specification. EDS 620 will illustrate the required configuration for a multiple cable splice using the breakout boot. Once these revisions are completed, the breakout boots will be installed in accordance with the EDS. Action requests have already been prepared for installation of the breakout boots on both the affected PORVs and reactor vessel head vent valves.
Corrective actions will be taken as appropriate for the splice overlap length problem once the root cause has been determined. This LER will be updated at that time to reflect those actions.
In response to a number of EQ discrepancies that have been identified during the restart readiness reviews currently underway, a Project Team has been assembled to assess the EQ process. This team is composed of members from EQ and Design Engineering, Maintenance Training, Maintenance Planning and Maintenance procedure writers, Quality Control, and Procurement. The team will review and assess the EQ process for adequate knowledge and training on installation practices for each discipline. The amount, content and frequency of training given to each discipline will be evaluated, as will the documents used for installation. The team is expected to complete their charter within 6 months, and appropriate actions will be taken to implement solutions to the problems they identify.
This information will be provided to the NRC once the long term actions have been determined.
ifi on Not Applicable vl Ev 315/97-006-01
, 316/97-00640