ML19240B960: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
Line 19: Line 19:
{{#Wiki_filter:,
{{#Wiki_filter:,
O 20MSUST10. ENGINEERING, IN .
O 20MSUST10. ENGINEERING, IN .
.
(f
(f
?
?
1981 CALVERT CLIFFS II PEF;'ELING OUTAGE END OF CYCLE 3 EDDY CURRENT INSPECTION RESULTS ON CONTROL ELEMENT ASSEMBLIES (CEA's)
1981 CALVERT CLIFFS II PEF;'ELING OUTAGE END OF CYCLE 3 EDDY CURRENT INSPECTION RESULTS ON CONTROL ELEMENT ASSEMBLIES (CEA's)
                                                            .
CEN-154 (B)-NP MARCH 5, 1981 01170 3 8
                                                              ..
CEN-154 (B)-NP
  *
    .
  '.
MARCH 5, 1981 01170 3 8


LEGAL NOTICE
LEGAL NOTICE THIS REPORT .VAS PREPARED AS AN ACCOUNT OF WORK SPONSORED BY COMBUSTION ENGINEERING, INC. NEITHER COMBUSTION ENGINEERING NOR ANY PERSON ACTING ON ITS BEHALF:                                            ,
  .
THIS REPORT .VAS PREPARED AS AN ACCOUNT OF WORK SPONSORED BY COMBUSTION ENGINEERING, INC. NEITHER COMBUSTION ENGINEERING
'
NOR ANY PERSON ACTING ON ITS BEHALF:                                            ,
                                                - .
A. MAKES ANY WARRANTY OR R EPR ES ENT ATION, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED INCLUDING THE WARRANTIES OF F#TNESS FOR A P* RTICULAR PURPOSE OR ME R CH AN T A BI LIT Y. WITH n';S PE CT TO 1HE ACCURACY, COMPLETENESS, CR USEFULNESS OF THE INFORMAT'ON CC''T AINED IN THIS REPORT, OR TH AT T HE USE O F AN Y INF ORMATIOrs, APP AR ATUS, *.'.E T HOD, '.
A. MAKES ANY WARRANTY OR R EPR ES ENT ATION, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED INCLUDING THE WARRANTIES OF F#TNESS FOR A P* RTICULAR PURPOSE OR ME R CH AN T A BI LIT Y. WITH n';S PE CT TO 1HE ACCURACY, COMPLETENESS, CR USEFULNESS OF THE INFORMAT'ON CC''T AINED IN THIS REPORT, OR TH AT T HE USE O F AN Y INF ORMATIOrs, APP AR ATUS, *.'.E T HOD, '.
OR PROCESS DISCLOSED IN THIS REPORT MAY Nf]T INF RINGE PRIVATELY OWNED RIGHTS;CR E. ASSUMES ANY LI ABILITIE3 'AITH RESPECT TO THL USE OF. On FOR DAMAGES RESULTING FRCM THE USE OF, ANY INFORf.1ATION, APPAR ATUS.
OR PROCESS DISCLOSED IN THIS REPORT MAY Nf]T INF RINGE PRIVATELY OWNED RIGHTS;CR E. ASSUMES ANY LI ABILITIE3 'AITH RESPECT TO THL USE OF. On FOR DAMAGES RESULTING FRCM THE USE OF, ANY INFORf.1ATION, APPAR ATUS.
METHOD OR FROCESS DISCLOSED IN This REFORT.
METHOD OR FROCESS DISCLOSED IN This REFORT.
                                                                                  .  .,


  .
A. CEA EDDY CURRE."T TEST RESULTS were eddy current tested during the Calvert C iffs II EGC-3 refueling outage in January, 1981. The CEA's resided in tle core positicns shown in Figure 1 and had been eddy current tested f llowing Cycle 2 (Ref.1). The purpose of the eddy current inspecticns was tolocateandquantifypotentialwearatthe(                                                  .
A. CEA EDDY CURRE."T TEST RESULTS
                                              ,
were eddy current tested during the Calvert
                                              '
C iffs II EGC-3 refueling outage in January, 1981. The CEA's resided in tle core positicns shown in Figure 1 and had been eddy current tested f llowing Cycle 2 (Ref.1). The purpose of the eddy current inspecticns was tolocateandquantifypotentialwearatthe(                                                  .
                                                              ,
d The testing was performed in accordance with approved C-E procedures for the detection of CEA wear. The,                            of each CEA finger was in-spected with an encircling eddy current coi!.
d The testing was performed in accordance with approved C-E procedures for the detection of CEA wear. The,                            of each CEA finger was in-spected with an encircling eddy current coi!.
  -
At E0C-3, sli;,nt indications of wear were observed The eddy current data collected en        ,
                                                                              -
At E0C-3, sli;,nt indications of wear were observed
                        ,
The eddy current data collected en        ,
could not be interpreted with any certainty due to electronic and mechanical equipment problems encountered during the inspection activity at the site.                Consequen.ly no data are presented for tnis CEA.
could not be interpreted with any certainty due to electronic and mechanical equipment problems encountered during the inspection activity at the site.                Consequen.ly no data are presented for tnis CEA.
I from these CEA's are summarized in Thesignalf                              J Table 1.        In order to cetermine the magnitude of wear associated witn a given signal,the signal      ,      ,
I from these CEA's are summarized in Thesignalf                              J Table 1.        In order to cetermine the magnitude of wear associated witn a given signal,the signal      ,      ,
in each case must be compared to signals obtained from testing a standard with wear simulations of known size and gecmetry. A description of the wear standard, used in t.his progran, and the corresponding signall                .easured at ECC-3 is presented in Table 2.          !!ote that the signal
in each case must be compared to signals obtained from testing a standard with wear simulations of known size and gecmetry. A description of the wear standard, used in t.his progran, and the corresponding signall                .easured at ECC-3 is presented in Table 2.          !!ote that the signal
                   ~~                    e                                                            .
                   ~~                    e                                                            .
        .
depends' upon thE
depends' upon thE
           ~
           ~
Line 65: Line 41:
                     ~                    l
                     ~                    l
* Thestandardusedinthisprogramconsistsoff L
* Thestandardusedinthisprogramconsistsoff L
and wa: the same standard used in
and wa: the same standard used in the EOC-2 measurements at Calvert Cliffs II.
    .                                                          .
the EOC-2 measurements at Calvert Cliffs II.
I          'of the average indicated wear following Cjcle 3 ranges The [              ]                                      .
I          'of the average indicated wear following Cjcle 3 ranges The [              ]                                      .
r  -
r  -
from
from CEAl L -
                >                                    .
also exhibits tne maximum wear signal of                  which correspcnds to a wear value of approximately
CEAl L -
also exhibits
.
      -
tne maximum wear signal of                  which correspcnds to a wear value of approximately
                                                                         }
                                                                         }


Measurements on the scme fingers at EOC-2 showed as measured after Cycle 3 considering the estimated overall measurement uncertainty    ,      ,
Measurements on the scme fingers at EOC-2 showed as measured after Cycle 3 considering the estimated overall measurement uncertainty    ,      ,
of the CEA eddy current test system. After Cycle 3
of the CEA eddy current test system. After Cycle 3 the maximum signal was found in the                                  Af t .- Cvele 2 the        ,
                                                                    ,
the maximum signal was found in the                                  Af t .- Cvele 2 the        ,
                                                        '
approximatewearestimatewasi            -
approximatewearestimatewasi            -
while at EOC-3 the approximate-L                .
while at EOC-3 the approximate-L                .
wear e.wimate was                      ,
wear e.wimate was                      ,
for this indication. It should be added              i that comparison of data between different inspection programs.must be based upon                                              Equipment                    can vary
for this indication. It should be added              i that comparison of data between different inspection programs.must be based upon                                              Equipment                    can vary from one test series to another resulting' in different                            ~
          '                                                                      '
The degree of wear measured in the CEA's at EOC-3 is acceptable for continued CEA operation since the measured wear is less than (Ref. 2).
from one test series to another resulting' in different                            ~
                            .
.
The degree of wear measured in the CEA's at EOC-3 is acceptable for
                                                                                                .
continued CEA operation since the measured wear is less than
                                                                            .                  .
(Ref. 2).
B.      VISUAL INSPECTION
B.      VISUAL INSPECTION
                               '        ~
                               '        ~
The lower            of        was visually inspected by TY. No anomalies
The lower            of        was visually inspected by TY. No anomalies were observed on any finger and no perceptible diameter variations were observed at any of the wear locations.
                              '
.
were observed on any finger and no perceptible diameter variations were observed at any of the wear locations.
REFERENCES                                                                              -
REFERENCES                                                                              -
                                                                                                    ..
: 1.    "Results of the CEA Guide Tube Inspection Program, Calvert Cliffs Unit #2 Docket No. 50-318", CEN-118 (B)-P, November 8, 1979
: 1.    "Results of the CEA Guide Tube Inspection Program, Calvert Cliffs Unit #2 Docket No. 50-318", CEN-118 (B)-P, November 8, 1979
: 2.      " Response to Request for Additional Information, CEA Guide Tube Inspection Program, Calvert Cliffs Unit No. 2, Docket No. 50-313",
: 2.      " Response to Request for Additional Information, CEA Guide Tube Inspection Program, Calvert Cliffs Unit No. 2, Docket No. 50-313",
CEN-116 (B)-P, dated October 8, 1979.
CEN-116 (B)-P, dated October 8, 1979.
  .
e
e
  .


TABLE 1 CALVERT CLIFFS II END-OF-CYCLE 3 CEA 'n' EAR TEST RESULTS
TABLE 1 CALVERT CLIFFS II END-OF-CYCLE 3 CEA 'n' EAR TEST RESULTS
                                                 ,        APPROXIF. ATE LOCATION CEA NO. FINGER          RESULTS          _
                                                 ,        APPROXIF. ATE LOCATION CEA NO. FINGER          RESULTS          _
(It'CHES FROM CEA BOTTOM)
(It'CHES FROM CEA BOTTOM) 9.
.
9.
b e
b e
S
S


                                  .
TABLE 2
TABLE 2
                                                                            *
     ~ CORRELATION: EDDY CURREriT TEST STANDARD SICNfsL            lVS. WEAR WEAR STANDARD (INCONEL 625 TUBING)
     ~ CORRELATION: EDDY CURREriT TEST STANDARD SICNfsL            lVS. WEAR
              .                .
WEAR STANDARD (INCONEL 625 TUBING)
                                .
       . WEAR SIMULATION    .                              AVERAGE      .
       . WEAR SIMULATION    .                              AVERAGE      .
SIGNAL
SIGNAL CORRELATIONS APPLY TO CALVERT CLIFFS II EOC-3 INSPECTIC!4 DNLY
                                                                        .
      ,                    .
                                                                    -
_
,
  .
                                                                              .
                                                                                ..
* CORRELATIONS APPLY TO CALVERT CLIFFS II EOC-3 INSPECTIC!4 DNLY
                                                          .
* 6
* 6


                                                                    .
                  -  -                                        ,
                                .
                                                            .
FIGURL 1 CORE LOCATIONS OF CEA's DURITIG ChCLES 1 TilRU 3 FOR CEA'S TilAT WERE EDDY CURREilT TESTED A
FIGURL 1 CORE LOCATIONS OF CEA's DURITIG ChCLES 1 TilRU 3 FOR CEA'S TilAT WERE EDDY CURREilT TESTED A
                                                                                              .
                                         .}}
                                         .}}

Latest revision as of 03:10, 2 February 2020

Nonproprietary Version of 1981 Calvert Cliffs Unit 2 Refueling Outage:End of Cycle 3 Eddy Current Insp Results on Control Element Assemblies.
ML19240B960
Person / Time
Site: Calvert Cliffs  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 03/05/1981
From:
ABB COMBUSTION ENGINEERING NUCLEAR FUEL (FORMERLY
To:
Shared Package
ML19240B958 List:
References
CEN-154(B)-NP, NUDOCS 8104170384
Download: ML19240B960 (7)


Text

,

O 20MSUST10. ENGINEERING, IN .

(f

?

1981 CALVERT CLIFFS II PEF;'ELING OUTAGE END OF CYCLE 3 EDDY CURRENT INSPECTION RESULTS ON CONTROL ELEMENT ASSEMBLIES (CEA's)

CEN-154 (B)-NP MARCH 5, 1981 01170 3 8

LEGAL NOTICE THIS REPORT .VAS PREPARED AS AN ACCOUNT OF WORK SPONSORED BY COMBUSTION ENGINEERING, INC. NEITHER COMBUSTION ENGINEERING NOR ANY PERSON ACTING ON ITS BEHALF: ,

A. MAKES ANY WARRANTY OR R EPR ES ENT ATION, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED INCLUDING THE WARRANTIES OF F#TNESS FOR A P* RTICULAR PURPOSE OR ME R CH AN T A BI LIT Y. WITH n';S PE CT TO 1HE ACCURACY, COMPLETENESS, CR USEFULNESS OF THE INFORMAT'ON CCT AINED IN THIS REPORT, OR TH AT T HE USE O F AN Y INF ORMATIOrs, APP AR ATUS, *.'.E T HOD, '.

OR PROCESS DISCLOSED IN THIS REPORT MAY Nf]T INF RINGE PRIVATELY OWNED RIGHTS;CR E. ASSUMES ANY LI ABILITIE3 'AITH RESPECT TO THL USE OF. On FOR DAMAGES RESULTING FRCM THE USE OF, ANY INFORf.1ATION, APPAR ATUS.

METHOD OR FROCESS DISCLOSED IN This REFORT.

A. CEA EDDY CURRE."T TEST RESULTS were eddy current tested during the Calvert C iffs II EGC-3 refueling outage in January, 1981. The CEA's resided in tle core positicns shown in Figure 1 and had been eddy current tested f llowing Cycle 2 (Ref.1). The purpose of the eddy current inspecticns was tolocateandquantifypotentialwearatthe( .

d The testing was performed in accordance with approved C-E procedures for the detection of CEA wear. The, of each CEA finger was in-spected with an encircling eddy current coi!.

At E0C-3, sli;,nt indications of wear were observed The eddy current data collected en ,

could not be interpreted with any certainty due to electronic and mechanical equipment problems encountered during the inspection activity at the site. Consequen.ly no data are presented for tnis CEA.

I from these CEA's are summarized in Thesignalf J Table 1. In order to cetermine the magnitude of wear associated witn a given signal,the signal , ,

in each case must be compared to signals obtained from testing a standard with wear simulations of known size and gecmetry. A description of the wear standard, used in t.his progran, and the corresponding signall .easured at ECC-3 is presented in Table 2.  !!ote that the signal

~~ e .

depends' upon thE

~

i

~ l

  • Thestandardusedinthisprogramconsistsoff L

and wa: the same standard used in the EOC-2 measurements at Calvert Cliffs II.

I 'of the average indicated wear following Cjcle 3 ranges The [ ] .

r -

from CEAl L -

also exhibits tne maximum wear signal of which correspcnds to a wear value of approximately

}

Measurements on the scme fingers at EOC-2 showed as measured after Cycle 3 considering the estimated overall measurement uncertainty , ,

of the CEA eddy current test system. After Cycle 3 the maximum signal was found in the Af t .- Cvele 2 the ,

approximatewearestimatewasi -

while at EOC-3 the approximate-L .

wear e.wimate was ,

for this indication. It should be added i that comparison of data between different inspection programs.must be based upon Equipment can vary from one test series to another resulting' in different ~

The degree of wear measured in the CEA's at EOC-3 is acceptable for continued CEA operation since the measured wear is less than (Ref. 2).

B. VISUAL INSPECTION

' ~

The lower of was visually inspected by TY. No anomalies were observed on any finger and no perceptible diameter variations were observed at any of the wear locations.

REFERENCES -

1. "Results of the CEA Guide Tube Inspection Program, Calvert Cliffs Unit #2 Docket No. 50-318", CEN-118 (B)-P, November 8, 1979
2. " Response to Request for Additional Information, CEA Guide Tube Inspection Program, Calvert Cliffs Unit No. 2, Docket No. 50-313",

CEN-116 (B)-P, dated October 8, 1979.

e

TABLE 1 CALVERT CLIFFS II END-OF-CYCLE 3 CEA 'n' EAR TEST RESULTS

, APPROXIF. ATE LOCATION CEA NO. FINGER RESULTS _

(It'CHES FROM CEA BOTTOM) 9.

b e

S

TABLE 2

~ CORRELATION: EDDY CURREriT TEST STANDARD SICNfsL lVS. WEAR WEAR STANDARD (INCONEL 625 TUBING)

. WEAR SIMULATION . AVERAGE .

SIGNAL CORRELATIONS APPLY TO CALVERT CLIFFS II EOC-3 INSPECTIC!4 DNLY

  • 6

FIGURL 1 CORE LOCATIONS OF CEA's DURITIG ChCLES 1 TilRU 3 FOR CEA'S TilAT WERE EDDY CURREilT TESTED A

.