ML19263F427: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
Evs. 0, ATE 74 75 REPOET C ATE 50 EVENT DESCRIPTION AND PROB ABLE CONSEQUEi.CES h El I On Januarv 5, 1980, while cerformine the e'eCtronatic relief valve oper- l c i s , , ability test, the 'D' EMRV failed to open. Three attempts were made to ] | Evs. 0, ATE 74 75 REPOET C ATE 50 EVENT DESCRIPTION AND PROB ABLE CONSEQUEi.CES h El I On Januarv 5, 1980, while cerformine the e'eCtronatic relief valve oper- l c i s , , ability test, the 'D' EMRV failed to open. Three attempts were made to ] | ||
ei.:i lopen the 'D' EMRV and each time there was no audible indication of steam l c is ; flow detected and there was not a sinilar increase in the downComer line j ictei i temperature as noted in the other EMRV tests. T.S.3.4.B.2 was violated. ; | ei.:i lopen the 'D' EMRV and each time there was no audible indication of steam l c is ; flow detected and there was not a sinilar increase in the downComer line j ictei i temperature as noted in the other EMRV tests. T.S.3.4.B.2 was violated. ; | ||
cn,; t | cn,; t o is [ | ||
, E = EO SYOTEM CAUSE CAUSE COMP. VALVE COLE CO;E SUSOO;E 0 0Y20NE*!T 00 0E SUE 00h! SUE 000E 13l91 7 L l C I C l@ l E @ l B l@ l VI Al L l V l E IX l@ l Hl@ l20Bl@ | , E = EO SYOTEM CAUSE CAUSE COMP. VALVE COLE CO;E SUSOO;E 0 0Y20NE*!T 00 0E SUE 00h! SUE 000E 13l91 7 L l C I C l@ l E @ l B l@ l VI Al L l V l E IX l@ l Hl@ l20Bl@ | ||
S 10 11 12 12 18 19 SE OUE NTI A. C CC:., R R EN CE REPORT REVISION | S 10 11 12 12 18 19 SE OUE NTI A. C CC:., R R EN CE REPORT REVISION | ||
Line 39: | Line 38: | ||
36 40 41 43 47 CAUSE DESCRIPTICN AND CORRECTIVE ACTIONS h i O l The retainer ring was found backed off about six threads and the grab l i i l screw was missing. The probable cause was iroroper rebuilding. The i | 36 40 41 43 47 CAUSE DESCRIPTICN AND CORRECTIVE ACTIONS h i O l The retainer ring was found backed off about six threads and the grab l i i l screw was missing. The probable cause was iroroper rebuilding. The i | ||
, 7 l other four EMRV's will be removed and inspected for proper grab screw l | , 7 l other four EMRV's will be removed and inspected for proper grab screw l | ||
, ,3 l installation. l 1 4 1 | , ,3 l installation. l 1 4 1 l | ||
7 8 9 80 F ACILITY METHODOF STATUS % POWER OTHER STATUS DISCOVERY DISCOVERY DESCRIPTION 3 ITTTl I Dl@ l100 l 1 l512l@l13 NA l l B lgl Operability Test l 7 8 9 44 45 46 80 ACTIVITY CONTENT AMOUNT OF ACTIVITY LOCATION OF RELEASE 1 6 l Zl ASE@D OF RELEASE lZl@l RELE NA l NA l 7 8 9 10 11 44 45 n 80 | |||
*E ASONNEL EXPOSURES U U [\ ll 6JH] h /[g llgf | *E ASONNEL EXPOSURES U U [\ ll 6JH] h /[g llgf | ||
'.mYBER TYPE OESCRIPTION 39 | '.mYBER TYPE OESCRIPTION 39 h Dh j~ | ||
h Dh j~ | |||
1 7 l0l0l0l@lZl@l NA - | 1 7 l0l0l0l@lZl@l NA - | ||
l | l Pi a:ONNEt N3UdiES | ||
.. u .ER 0ESOR,P110Ne | |||
Pi a:ONNEt N3UdiES | |||
.. u .ER | |||
0ESOR,P110Ne | |||
}O [ .D 8 NA 7 | }O [ .D 8 NA 7 | ||
i x 8 9 1010 lo l@l12 11 83 l | i x 8 9 1010 lo l@l12 11 83 l | ||
Line 64: | Line 55: | ||
p lY l3] 1, l | p lY l3] 1, l | ||
CE 09 ll l l 1lltl1ll l- | CE 09 ll l l 1lltl1ll l- | ||
, , , ,. n, ,g, Donald A. Rest pggyg 201-455-8784 | , , , ,. n, ,g, Donald A. Rest pggyg 201-455-8784 | ||
Jersey Central Power & Light Company r) " | Jersey Central Power & Light Company r) " | ||
Madison Avenue at Punch Bow! Road Morristown New Jersey 07960 (201)455-8200 OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION Forked River, New Jersey 08731 Licensee Event Report Reportable Occurrence No. 50-219/80/1/IT Report Date January 21, 1980 Occurrence Date January 5,1980 identification of Occurrence Violation of the Technical Specifications, paragraph 3.4.B.2, when EMRV 'D' did not open when tested during shutdown. | Madison Avenue at Punch Bow! Road Morristown New Jersey 07960 (201)455-8200 OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION Forked River, New Jersey 08731 Licensee Event Report Reportable Occurrence No. 50-219/80/1/IT Report Date January 21, 1980 Occurrence Date January 5,1980 identification of Occurrence Violation of the Technical Specifications, paragraph 3.4.B.2, when EMRV 'D' did not open when tested during shutdown. | ||
Line 78: | Line 66: | ||
Apparent Cause of Occurrence Component failure was the cause of this event. The retainer ring was backed off about six threads and ;he grab screw was missing. It appears as though the grab screw was improperly assembled during previous assembly. | Apparent Cause of Occurrence Component failure was the cause of this event. The retainer ring was backed off about six threads and ;he grab screw was missing. It appears as though the grab screw was improperly assembled during previous assembly. | ||
1817 350 , | 1817 350 , | ||
Jete, Cr4 Po..e' & Liant Company e; a nmber of t e Genet Pat : Uuties System | Jete, Cr4 Po..e' & Liant Company e; a nmber of t e Genet Pat : Uuties System | ||
l Repcrtable Occurrence Pace 2 Report No. 50-219/80/1/1T Analysis of Occurrence The relief valves of the automatic depressurization system enab'es the co're spray system to provide protection against the small break in the event the feedwater system is not active. Since the 'D' EMRV was inoperable, the A.D.S. was con-sidered to be operable in a degraded mode. The loss of one EMRV has been addressed in the loss of cooling accident analysis. | l Repcrtable Occurrence Pace 2 Report No. 50-219/80/1/1T Analysis of Occurrence The relief valves of the automatic depressurization system enab'es the co're spray system to provide protection against the small break in the event the feedwater system is not active. Since the 'D' EMRV was inoperable, the A.D.S. was con-sidered to be operable in a degraded mode. The loss of one EMRV has been addressed in the loss of cooling accident analysis. | ||
Also, the relief valves are provided to remove sufficient energy from the primary system to prevent the safety valves fr>m lifting during a transient. The limiting pressure transient is a turbine trip rom rated design power with a failure of the bypass to function. The five relief valves are required to operate to prevent reaching the lowest setpoint of the primary system safety valves. With four relief valves operable and the core thermal power not reduced to 1740 MWt to preserve a 25 psig margin between peak transient pressure and the lowest safety valve setpoint, there was no assurance that the safety valves would not lift. | Also, the relief valves are provided to remove sufficient energy from the primary system to prevent the safety valves fr>m lifting during a transient. The limiting pressure transient is a turbine trip rom rated design power with a failure of the bypass to function. The five relief valves are required to operate to prevent reaching the lowest setpoint of the primary system safety valves. With four relief valves operable and the core thermal power not reduced to 1740 MWt to preserve a 25 psig margin between peak transient pressure and the lowest safety valve setpoint, there was no assurance that the safety valves would not lift. | ||
Corrective Action The EMRV was removed and transported to the test stand where it was discovered that the retainer ring was backed off about six threads and the grab screw which | Corrective Action The EMRV was removed and transported to the test stand where it was discovered that the retainer ring was backed off about six threads and the grab screw which keeps the retainer ring in place was missing. | ||
keeps the retainer ring in place was missing. | |||
The other four EMRV's will be removed cnd inspected for the same problem. The probable cause was due to improper rebuilding. All rebuilt valves will be checked for proper installation of the grab screw. | The other four EMRV's will be removed cnd inspected for the same problem. The probable cause was due to improper rebuilding. All rebuilt valves will be checked for proper installation of the grab screw. | ||
Failure Data NR108D Size: 6x8 Mfg.: Dresser industries | Failure Data NR108D Size: 6x8 Mfg.: Dresser industries | ||
\0\ ,}} | \0\ ,}} |
Latest revision as of 19:26, 1 February 2020
ML19263F427 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Oyster Creek |
Issue date: | 01/21/1980 |
From: | Ross D JERSEY CENTRAL POWER & LIGHT CO. |
To: | NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
Shared Package | |
ML19263F426 | List: |
References | |
FOIA-81-159 LER-80-001-01T, LER-80-1-1T, NUDOCS 8001280256 | |
Download: ML19263F427 (3) | |
Text
LICENSEE EVENT REPORT
,. -- :: E LOCO ! ! ! I I l@ ;F. EASE PRINT OR TYPE ALL REQUIRED INFOR!.%TIONI
(
Ic ! !N'Ji0IC!P l1 ul@!01Cl-l0ICl010 'O l- l0 ID l I l@
7 t e uCEN:st 000: :s uOeN;E u vat = at@26!Li04Esse l 1TveEl 1o I l i 1-alh!
t' se c oN*-
[011
' E 1
.D*0I !caL l@lo01 51 01 010121 1 10 e4l@
ac0 SET NuvE E A c a.
- 1!Iclc.l8101@lollI2I1 1; lo l@
Evs. 0, ATE 74 75 REPOET C ATE 50 EVENT DESCRIPTION AND PROB ABLE CONSEQUEi.CES h El I On Januarv 5, 1980, while cerformine the e'eCtronatic relief valve oper- l c i s , , ability test, the 'D' EMRV failed to open. Three attempts were made to ]
ei.:i lopen the 'D' EMRV and each time there was no audible indication of steam l c is ; flow detected and there was not a sinilar increase in the downComer line j ictei i temperature as noted in the other EMRV tests. T.S.3.4.B.2 was violated. ;
cn,; t o is [
, E = EO SYOTEM CAUSE CAUSE COMP. VALVE COLE CO;E SUSOO;E 0 0Y20NE*!T 00 0E SUE 00h! SUE 000E 13l91 7 L l C I C l@ l E @ l B l@ l VI Al L l V l E IX l@ l Hl@ l20Bl@
S 10 11 12 12 18 19 SE OUE NTI A. C CC:., R R EN CE REPORT REVISION
- o EVENT YE AR REPORT NO. CODE TYPE NO.
O" =gg:5.f.gI 81 01 1-1 10 10 11 I l/l 10 11 1 TI l-l i I 21 22 23 24 26 27 26 29 30 31 32 ACTION F L*TU R E EF8ECT SMUTDOWN ATTACHMENT NPRDA PRIME COMP. COMPONENT TAKEN ACTION ON PLANT METHOD HOURS 22 SUBMITTED FORM bu8. SUPPLIER MANUF ACTUR ER l32X l@l34B l@ l3bZ l@ lZl@ l0 l0 l0 10 l 37 lYl@ l42Y l@ lN l@ l44 Dl 214 l 5 l{
36 40 41 43 47 CAUSE DESCRIPTICN AND CORRECTIVE ACTIONS h i O l The retainer ring was found backed off about six threads and the grab l i i l screw was missing. The probable cause was iroroper rebuilding. The i
, 7 l other four EMRV's will be removed and inspected for proper grab screw l
, ,3 l installation. l 1 4 1 l
7 8 9 80 F ACILITY METHODOF STATUS % POWER OTHER STATUS DISCOVERY DISCOVERY DESCRIPTION 3 ITTTl I Dl@ l100 l 1 l512l@l13 NA l l B lgl Operability Test l 7 8 9 44 45 46 80 ACTIVITY CONTENT AMOUNT OF ACTIVITY LOCATION OF RELEASE 1 6 l Zl ASE@D OF RELEASE lZl@l RELE NA l NA l 7 8 9 10 11 44 45 n 80
- E ASONNEL EXPOSURES U U [\ ll 6JH] h /[g llgf
'.mYBER TYPE OESCRIPTION 39 h Dh j~
1 7 l0l0l0l@lZl@l NA -
l Pi a:ONNEt N3UdiES
.. u .ER 0ESOR,P110Ne
}O [ .D 8 NA 7
i x 8 9 1010 lo l@l12 11 83 l
LC',5 OF OR OAMAGE TO FACILITY TvPE CESCRIPTloN 8g0128o v
i 9 lZl@l NA 256 E0 l
7 6 9 TC
- - r NRC 16E ONLY it ; ; E y'0 DESC L '0I A1PT T Y IO*. .
Weekly News Release
,,[-
p lY l3] 1, l
CE 09 ll l l 1lltl1ll l-
, , , ,. n, ,g, Donald A. Rest pggyg 201-455-8784
Jersey Central Power & Light Company r) "
Madison Avenue at Punch Bow! Road Morristown New Jersey 07960 (201)455-8200 OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION Forked River, New Jersey 08731 Licensee Event Report Reportable Occurrence No. 50-219/80/1/IT Report Date January 21, 1980 Occurrence Date January 5,1980 identification of Occurrence Violation of the Technical Specifications, paragraph 3.4.B.2, when EMRV 'D' did not open when tested during shutdown.
. This event is considered to be a reportable occurrence as defined in the Techni-cal Specifications, paragraph 6.9.2.A.
Conditions Prior to Occurrence The plant was being shutdown for refueling and maintenance.
The major parameters at the time of occurrence were:
Power: Reactor, 280 MWt Generator, O MWe Flow: Recirculation 12.6 x 106 gpm Feedwater .8 x 104 #/hr.
Stack Gas: 2.67 x 104 pei/sec Description of Occurrence On Saturday, January 5, 1980 at approximately 3:00 AM while performing the Electromatic Relief Valve Operability Test, the 'D' EMRV failed to open. There were three attempts to open the 'D' EMRV and each time there was no audible indication of steam flow detected and there was not a similar increase in the downcomer line temperature as noted in the other EMRV tests.
Apparent Cause of Occurrence Component failure was the cause of this event. The retainer ring was backed off about six threads and ;he grab screw was missing. It appears as though the grab screw was improperly assembled during previous assembly.
1817 350 ,
Jete, Cr4 Po..e' & Liant Company e; a nmber of t e Genet Pat : Uuties System
l Repcrtable Occurrence Pace 2 Report No. 50-219/80/1/1T Analysis of Occurrence The relief valves of the automatic depressurization system enab'es the co're spray system to provide protection against the small break in the event the feedwater system is not active. Since the 'D' EMRV was inoperable, the A.D.S. was con-sidered to be operable in a degraded mode. The loss of one EMRV has been addressed in the loss of cooling accident analysis.
Also, the relief valves are provided to remove sufficient energy from the primary system to prevent the safety valves fr>m lifting during a transient. The limiting pressure transient is a turbine trip rom rated design power with a failure of the bypass to function. The five relief valves are required to operate to prevent reaching the lowest setpoint of the primary system safety valves. With four relief valves operable and the core thermal power not reduced to 1740 MWt to preserve a 25 psig margin between peak transient pressure and the lowest safety valve setpoint, there was no assurance that the safety valves would not lift.
Corrective Action The EMRV was removed and transported to the test stand where it was discovered that the retainer ring was backed off about six threads and the grab screw which keeps the retainer ring in place was missing.
The other four EMRV's will be removed cnd inspected for the same problem. The probable cause was due to improper rebuilding. All rebuilt valves will be checked for proper installation of the grab screw.
Failure Data NR108D Size: 6x8 Mfg.: Dresser industries
\0\ ,