Information Notice 1990-59, Errors in Use of Radioactive Iodine-131: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
| issue date = 09/17/1990
| issue date = 09/17/1990
| title = Errors in Use of Radioactive Iodine-131
| title = Errors in Use of Radioactive Iodine-131
| author name = Cunningham R E
| author name = Cunningham R
| author affiliation = NRC/NMSS/IMNS
| author affiliation = NRC/NMSS/IMNS
| addressee name =  
| addressee name =  
Line 13: Line 13:
| document type = NRC Information Notice
| document type = NRC Information Notice
| page count = 8
| page count = 8
| revision = 0
}}
}}
{{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATESNUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSIONOFFICE OF NUCLEAR MATERIALS SAFETY AND SAFEGUARDSWASHINGTON, D.C. 20555September 17, 1990NRC INFORMATION NOTICE NO. 90-59:ERRORS IN THE USE OF RADIOACTIVE IODINE-131
{{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES
 
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
 
OFFICE OF NUCLEAR MATERIALS SAFETY AND SAFEGUARDS
 
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555 September 17, 1990
NRC INFORMATION NOTICE NO. 90-59:   ERRORS IN THE USE OF RADIOACTIVE IODINE-131


==Addressees==
==Addressees==
:All medical licensees.
:
All medical licensees.


==Purpose==
==Purpose==
:This information notice is intended to emphasize to medical use licensees thepotential radiation dose levels resulting from errors in the administrationof iodine-131 to humans. This issue was previously addressed in IE InformationNotice No. 85-61, Suppliment 1: Misadministrations To Patients UndergoingThyroid Scans (attached). Due to the significance and frequency of recurrenceof these errors, NRC believes this issue should be readdressed. It is expectedthat licensees will review this information for application to their own proceduresfor the administration of iodine-131, distribute the notice to those responsiblefor radiation safety and quality assurance, and consider actions, if appropriate,to establish procedures to preclude the misadministration of iodine-131 at theirfacilities. However, suggestions contained in this notice do not constitute anynew U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) requirements, and no writtenresponse is required.
:
This information notice is intended to emphasize to medical use licensees the
 
potential radiation dose levels resulting from errors in the administration
 
of iodine-131 to humans. This issue was previously addressed in IE Information
 
Notice No. 85-61, Suppliment 1: Misadministrations To Patients Undergoing
 
Thyroid Scans (attached). Due to the significance and frequency of recurrence
 
of these errors, NRC believes this issue should be readdressed. It is expected
 
that licensees will review this information for application to their own procedures
 
for the administration of iodine-131, distribute the notice to those responsible
 
for radiation safety and quality assurance, and consider actions, if appropriate, to establish procedures to preclude the misadministration of iodine-131 at their
 
facilities. However, suggestions contained in this notice do not constitute any
 
new U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) requirements, and no written
 
response is required.


==Description of Circumstances==
==Description of Circumstances==
:The following cases are recent events reported to NRC that have resulted inunintended radiation doses to humans, as a result of the administration ofradioactive iodine:Case 1: A patient with a history of thyroid cancer was scheduled for heryearly whole-body scan. Before the scan, the patient underwent a pregnancytest, with negative results. After the pregnancy test results were received,the technologist began to complete a departmental questionnaire to obtaininformation from the patient relative to the requested procedure. Thequestionnaire addressed the possibilities of pregnancy and lactation. However,before completing the questionnaire, the technologist was called away and didnot return to complete the form before administration of the iodine-131. Asa result, the patient was given the intended dosage of 4.89 millicuries ofiodine-131. Approximately 48 hours later when the patient was scanned, therewas considerable iodine-131 uptake in her breasts. When questioned by thephysician, the patient indicated that she had given birth to a female infanttwo weeks earlier and had been nursing this infant for approximately the last36 hours. The total body dose to the infant was estimated to be 17 rads,and the radiation dose to the infant's thyroid was estimated to be 30,000rads. A synthetic thyroid hormone replacement has been prescribed for thechild, with scheduled periodic follow-ups. The unintended dose to the mother'sbreasts was estimated to be 8.9 rads.> 920156 Z J 49_0we IN 90-59September 17, 1990 Case 2: A patient to be scheduled for a thyroid scan was administered 3millicuries of iodine-131 instead of the intended dosage of 300 microcuries ofiodine-123. The patient's physician called in the request for a thyroid scanto the secretary of the nuclear medicine department, who inadvertentlyscheduled a whole-body scan. No written request from the physician wasrequired. The dosage at this facility for a whole-body scan is 3 millicuriesof iodine-131, whereas the dosage for a thyroid scan is 300 microcuries ofiodine-123. The estimated dose to the patient's thyroid gland due to thiserror was 4700 rads.Case 3: A patient was scheduled for an ectopic thyroid evaluation, with anintended dosage of 100 microcuries of iodine-131. In completing the NuclearMedicine department referral sheet, the referring physician incorrectlyrequested a post-thyroidectomy neck scan. As a result, the patient wasadministered 1 millicurie of iodine-131, with an estimated dose to thethyroid of 1300 rads.Case 4: A patient was scheduled for an ectopic thyroid evaluation, with anIntended dosage of 50 to 100 microcuries of iodine-131. The technologistconsulted the department procedure manual that listed prescribed dosages forspecific scans, and the dosage was incorrectly listed as 4.5 millicuries. As a'result, the patient was administered 4.3 millicuries. The estimated dose'tothis patient's thyroid gland was 4300 rads.Case 5: A patient was administered a dosage of 15 microcuries of iodine-131.Almost immediately following the administration, the patient indicated to thetechnologist that she was approximately 4 to 5 weeks pregnant.. The technologistfailed to ask the patient if she was pregnant before the administration. Thepatient had arrived at the department with a baby in her arms, and thetechnologist assumed that the patient was not pregnant. The total body dose tothe fetus was estimated to be 2 to 4 millirem. Since the fetal thyroid isincapable of concentrating iodine-131 until approximately 12 weeks of gestation,it was estimated that there was no additional dose to the fetal thyroid.
:
The following cases are recent events reported to NRC that have resulted in
 
unintended radiation doses to humans, as a result of the administration of
 
radioactive iodine:
Case 1: A patient with a history of thyroid cancer was scheduled for her
 
yearly whole-body scan. Before the scan, the patient underwent a pregnancy
 
test, with negative results. After the pregnancy test results were received, the technologist began to complete a departmental questionnaire to obtain
 
information from the patient relative to the requested procedure. The
 
questionnaire addressed the possibilities of pregnancy and lactation. However, before completing the questionnaire, the technologist was called away and did
 
not return to complete the form before administration of the iodine-131. As
 
a result, the patient was given the intended dosage of 4.89 millicuries of
 
iodine-131. Approximately 48 hours later when the patient was scanned, there
 
was considerable iodine-131 uptake in her breasts. When questioned by the
 
physician, the patient indicated that she had given birth to a female the infant
 
two weeks earlier and had been nursing this infant for approximately       last
 
36 hours. The total   body dose to the infant was estimated to be 17 rads, and the radiation dose to the infant's thyroid was estimated to be 30,000
rads. A synthetic thyroid hormone replacement has been prescribed for the
 
child, with scheduled periodic follow-ups. The unintended dose to the mother's
 
breasts was estimated to be 8.9 rads.
 
920156
>9_0we        Z 4J
 
IN 90-59 September 17, 1990 Case 2: A patient to be scheduled for a thyroid scan was
 
millicuries of iodine-131 instead of the intended dosage ofadministered      3
                                                              300 microcuries of
 
iodine-123. The patient's physician called in the request for
 
a thyroid scan
 
to the secretary of the nuclear medicine department, who inadvertently
 
scheduled a whole-body scan. No written request from the physician
 
required. The dosage at this facility for a whole-body scan is           was
 
3 of iodine-131, whereas the dosage for a thyroid scan is 300 microcuriesmillicuries
 
iodine-123. The estimated dose to the patient's thyroid gland                 of
 
error was 4700 rads.                                               due  to  this
 
Case 3: A patient was scheduled for an ectopic thyroid evaluation, intended dosage of 100 microcuries of iodine-131. In completing         with an
 
Medicine department referral sheet, the referring physician         the  Nuclear
 
incorrectly
 
requested a post-thyroidectomy neck scan. As a result, the patient
 
administered 1 millicurie of iodine-131, with an estimated dose         was
 
thyroid of 1300 rads.                                               to  the
 
Case 4: A patient was scheduled for an ectopic thyroid evaluation, Intended dosage of 50 to 100 microcuries of iodine-131. The technologistwith an
 
consulted the department procedure manual that listed prescribed
 
dosages for
 
specific scans, and the dosage was incorrectly listed as 4.5 millicuries.
 
'result, the patient was administered 4.3 millicuries. The estimated               As a
 
this patient's thyroid gland was 4300 rads.                               dose'to
 
Case 5: A patient was administered a dosage of 15 microcuries
 
Almost immediately following the administration, the patient     of iodine-131.
 
technologist that she was approximately 4 to 5 weeks pregnant..indicated      to the
 
The
 
failed to ask the patient if she was pregnant before the administration. technologist
 
patient had arrived at the department with a baby in her arms,                   The
 
technologist assumed that the patient was not pregnant. The     and    the
 
the fetus was estimated to be 2 to 4 millirem. Since the fetal total body dose to
 
incapable of concentrating iodine-131 until approximately 12       thyroid is
 
weeks
 
it was estimated that there was no additional dose to the fetal         of gestation, thyroid.


==DISCUSSION==
==DISCUSSION==
:All licensees are reminded of the importance of ensuring the safe performanceof licensed activities, in accordance with NRC regulations, requirements oftheir licenses, and accepted medical practice. The forementioned casesillustrate: the lack of familiarity with appropriate thyroid studies anddosages; the necessity of consistently following quality control procedures;and a need to understand the significance of radiation doses that result -from the administration of millicuries versus microcuries of radiopharmaceuticalscontaining radioiodine. Specifically, the radiation dose to the thyroid,resulting from a dosage of one millicurie rather than one microcurie ofj .
:
IN 90-59September 17, 1990 iodine-131, is a one thousand-fold increase. In addition, the radiation dosereceived from an activity of iodine-131 is approximately-100 fold greater thanthe dose from the same activity of iodine-123. The following table illustratesthe relationship between microcurie versus millicurie quantities of iodine-131,as well as the radiation dose differential between iodine-123 and iodine-131,for three different age groups, with a thyroid uptake of 15 percent.TABLE:1 year5 yearsAdultA Comparison of IsQtopes and'Radiation Doses forVarious Age Groups Assuming 15% Uptake by the Thyroid*Rads per uqi Rads per mCiI-123 1-131 I-123 1-131old 0.07 7.40 70.3 7400old 0.04 4.07 40.0 40700.007 0.78 7.0 777...* Based on information from ICRP-Publication No. 53All workers should have a clear understanding of the significance of errors.inscale when calculating and preparing diagnostic dosages versus therapeuticdosages of radiopharmaceuticals containing radioiodine. The threshold at whicha diagnostic dosage becomes a therapeutic dosage is low, and depends on the ageof the patient and the percent uptake by the patient's thyroid gland.Consequently, the potential for causing a significant, undesired radiationdose to a patient's thyroid gland must always be kept in mind when administeringiodine radiopharmaceuticals.Licensees are reminded that the package inserts provided by the manufacturerscontain information pertinent to both proper dosages and radiation doses,and may be valuable resources when reviewing imaging policies and proceduresfor errors and inconsistencies. Nuclear medicine department procedures shouldinclude provisions for questioning female patients about the possibility ofpregnancy or lactation. By attention to detail, and adherence to departmentalpolicy and procedures, many incidents involving radioactive iodine-131 may beavoide r-IN 90-59September 17, 1990 No specific written response is required by this information notice. If youhave any questions regarding this matter, please contact the appropriate regionaloffice or this office.M r Cunnnhm, roDivision of Industrial andMedical Nuclear SafetyOffice of Nuclear Material Safetyand Safeguards
All licensees are reminded of the importance of ensuring the
 
safe performance
 
of licensed activities, in accordance with NRC regulations, requirements
 
their licenses, and accepted medical practice. The forementioned                 of
 
illustrate: the lack of familiarity with appropriate thyroid           cases
 
dosages; the necessity of consistently following quality control studies and
 
and a need to understand the significance of radiation doses         procedures;
from the administration of millicuries versus microcuries of   that    result -
containing radioiodine. Specifically, the radiation dose       radiopharmaceuticals
 
resulting from a dosage of one millicurie rather than one to the thyroid, microcurie of
 
.
 
IN 90-59 September 17, 1990 radiation dose
 
iodine-131, is a one thousand-fold increase. In addition, the             greater than
 
received from an activity of iodine-131 is approximately-100 fold           illustrates
 
the dose from the same activity of iodine-123. The following table     of  iodine-131, the relationship between microcurie versus millicurie quantities   and  iodine-131, as well as the radiation dose differential between iodine-123 for three different age groups, with a thyroid uptake of 15 percent.
 
TABLE: A Comparison of IsQtopes and'Radiation Doses for
 
Various Age Groups Assuming 15% Uptake by the Thyroid*
                          Rads per uqi                   Rads per mCi
 
I-123         1-131         I-123       1-131
      1 year  old      0.07           7.40           70.3       7400
      5 years old      0.04           4.07           40.0       4070
      Adult            0.007         0.78           7.0         777
                                                                                .   . .
 
* Based on information from ICRP-Publication No. 53 of errors.in
 
All workers should have a clear understanding of the significance     therapeutic
 
scale when calculating and preparing diagnostic dosages versusthreshold at which
 
dosages of radiopharmaceuticals containing radioiodine. The                   on the age
 
a diagnostic dosage becomes a therapeutic dosage is low, and depends
 
thyroid  gland.
 
of the patient and the percent uptake by the patient's                 radiation
 
Consequently, the potential for causing a significant, undesired   when    administering
 
dose to a patient's thyroid gland must always     be kept in mind
 
iodine radiopharmaceuticals.
 
manufacturers
 
Licensees are reminded that the package inserts provided by the           doses, contain information pertinent   to both proper dosages and radiation
 
when  reviewing  imaging  policies  and  procedures
 
and may be valuable resources                                                     should
 
for errors and inconsistencies. Nuclear medicine department procedures of
 
include provisions for questioning female patients about the     possibility
 
pregnancy or lactation. By attention to detail, and adherence to departmental    may be
 
policy and procedures, many incidents involving radioactive iodine-131 avoided.
 
r- IN 90-59 September 17, 1990 No specific written response is required by this information
 
have any questions regarding this matter, please contact         notice. If you
 
office or this office.                                       the appropriate regional
 
M     rCunnnhm, ro
 
Division of Industrial and
 
Medical Nuclear Safety
 
Office of Nuclear Material Safety
 
and Safeguards


===Technical Contact:===
===Technical Contact:===
Sally Merchant, NMSS(301) 492-0637-


===Attachments:===
===Sally Merchant, NMSS===
1. List of Recently Issued NMSSInformation Notices.2. List of Recently Issued NRCInformation Notice Attachment 1IN 90-59September 17, 1990 LIST OF RECENTLY ISSUEDHMSS INFORMATION NOTICESInformation Date ofNotice No. Subject Issuance Issued to:90-50Minimization of Methane Gasin Plant Systems and RadwasteShipping Containers08/08/90All holderslicenses orpermits forreactorsof operatingconstructionnuclear power90-44Dose-Rate Instruments06/29/9090-38 Requirements for Processing 05/29/90Financial Assurance Submittalsfor Decommissioning90-35 Transportation of Type A-Quantities of Non-FissileRadioactive Materials90-31 Update on Waste Form andHigh Integrity ContainerTopical Report Review Status,Identification of Problemswith Cement Solidication, andReporting of Waste Mishaps90-27 Clarification of theRecent Revisions to theRegulatory Requirementsfor Packaging of UraniumHexafluoride (UF6 ) forTransportation90-24 Transportation of ModelSPEC 2-T RadiographicExposure Device90-20 Personnel InjuriesResulting from ImproperOperation of RadwasteIncinerators05/24/9005/04/9004/30/9004/10/9003/22/90All NRC licenseesAll fuel facilityand materialsAll U.S. NuclearRegulatory Commission(NRC) LicenseesAll holders of operatinglicenses or constructionpermits for nuclear powerreactors, fuel cyclelicenses, and certainbyproduct materialslicensesAll Uranium FuelFabrication and ConversionFacilitiesAll NRC licenseesauthorized to use,transport, or operateradiographic exposuredevices and sourcechangersAll NRC licenseeswho process or incinerateradioactive waste  
                    (301) 492-0637- Attachments:
--Attachment 2 -IN-90-59 !September 17, 1990. LIST OF RECENTLY ISSUEDNRC INFORMATION NOTICESInformation Date ofNotice No. Subject Issuance Issued to90-5890-5790-5690-5583-44Supp. 1Improper Handling ofOphthalmic Strontium-90Beta Radiation ApplicatorsSubstandard, RefurbishedPotter & Brumfield RelaysMisrepresented As NewInadvertent Shipment of ARadioactive Source In AContainer Thought To BeEmptyRecent Operating Experi-ence on Loss of ReactorCoolant Inventory WhileIn A Shutdown ConditionPotential Damage toRedundant Safety Equip-ment As A Result ofBackflow Through theEquipment and Floor DrainSystemSummary of RequalificationProgram DeficienciesCriminal Prosecution ofWrongdoing Committed bySuppliers of NuclearProducts or ServicesPotential Failures ofAuxiliary Steam Piping andthe Possible Effects on theOperability of Vital Equip-ment9/11/909/5/909/4/908/31/908/30/908/28/908/24/908/16/90All NRC medicallicensees.All holders of OLsor CPs for nuclearpower reactors.All U.S. NuclearRegulatory Com-mission (NRC)licensees.All holders of OLsor CPs for nuclearpower reactors.All holders of OLsor CPs for nuclearpower reactors.All holders of GLsor CPs for nuclearpower reactors.All holders of OLsor CPs for nuclearpower reactors.All holders of OLsor CPs for nuclearpower reactors.90-5489-18Supp.190-53OL = Operating LicenseCP = Construction Permit IN 90-September ,1990 No specific written response is required by this information notice. If youhave any questions regarding this matter, please contact the appropriateregional office or this office.~4M zlgned #1Richard Cunningham, DirectorDivision of Industrial andMedical Nuclear SafetyOffice of Nuclear Material Safetyand Safeguards
1. List of Recently Issued NMSS
 
Information Notices.
 
2. List of Recently Issued NRC
 
Information Notices.
 
Attachment 1 IN 90-59 September 17, 1990 LIST OF RECENTLY ISSUED
 
HMSS INFORMATION NOTICES
 
===Information                              Date of===
Notice No.           Subject             Issuance   Issued to:
90-50      Minimization of Methane Gas    08/08/90    All holders of operating
 
in Plant Systems and Radwaste              licenses or construction
 
Shipping Containers                        permits for nuclear power
 
reactors
 
90-44      Dose-Rate Instruments          06/29/90    All NRC licensees
 
90-38     Requirements for Processing   05/29/90    All fuel facility
 
Financial Assurance Submittals            and materials
 
for Decommissioning
 
90-35     Transportation of Type A       05/24/90  All U.S. Nuclear
 
-   Quantities of Non-Fissile                  Regulatory Commission
 
Radioactive Materials                      (NRC) Licensees
 
90-31     Update on Waste Form and      05/04/90  All holders of operating
 
High Integrity Container                  licenses or construction
 
Topical Report Review Status,             permits for nuclear power
 
Identification of Problems                reactors, fuel cycle
 
with Cement Solidication, and              licenses, and certain
 
Reporting of Waste Mishaps                byproduct materials
 
licenses
 
90-27     Clarification of the          04/30/90    All Uranium Fuel
 
Recent Revisions to the                    Fabrication and Conversion
 
Regulatory Requirements                    Facilities
 
for Packaging of Uranium
 
Hexafluoride (UF6 ) for
 
Transportation
 
90-24     Transportation of Model        04/10/90    All NRC licensees
 
SPEC 2-T Radiographic                      authorized to use, Exposure Device                            transport, or operate
 
radiographic exposure
 
devices and source
 
changers
 
90-20      Personnel Injuries            03/22/90  All NRC licensees
 
Resulting from Improper                  who process or incinerate
 
Operation of Radwaste                    radioactive waste
 
Incinerators
 
- - Attachment 2       -
                                                            IN-90-59 !
                                                            September 17, 1990
                                                            . LIST OF RECENTLY ISSUED
 
NRC INFORMATION NOTICES
 
Information                                    Date of
 
Notice No.               Subject               Issuance     Issued to
 
90-58          Improper Handling of            9/11/90    All NRC medical
 
Ophthalmic Strontium-90                      licensees.
 
Beta Radiation Applicators
 
90-57          Substandard, Refurbished        9/5/90      All holders of OLs
 
Potter & Brumfield Relays                    or CPs for nuclear
 
Misrepresented As New                        power reactors.
 
90-56          Inadvertent Shipment of A        9/4/90      All U.S. Nuclear
 
Radioactive Source In A                      Regulatory Com- Container Thought To Be                      mission (NRC)
              Empty                                        licensees.
 
90-55          Recent Operating Experi-         8/31/90    All holders of OLs
 
ence on Loss of Reactor                      or CPs for nuclear
 
Coolant Inventory While                      power reactors.
 
In A Shutdown Condition
 
83-44          Potential Damage to              8/30/90    All holders of OLs
 
Supp. 1        Redundant Safety Equip-                     or CPs for nuclear
 
ment As A Result of                          power reactors.
 
Backflow Through the
 
Equipment and Floor Drain
 
System
 
90-54          Summary of Requalification      8/28/90    All holders of GLs
 
Program Deficiencies                        or CPs for nuclear
 
power reactors.
 
89-18          Criminal Prosecution of          8/24/90    All holders of OLs
 
Supp. 1        Wrongdoing Committed by                      or CPs for nuclear
 
Suppliers of Nuclear                        power reactors.
 
Products or Services
 
90-53          Potential Failures of           8/16/90    All holders of OLs
 
Auxiliary Steam Piping and                  or CPs for nuclear
 
the Possible Effects on the                  power reactors.
 
Operability of Vital Equip- ment
 
OL = Operating License
 
CP = Construction Permit
 
IN 90-
                                                                September ,1990 No specific written response is required by this information notice. If you
 
have any questions regarding this matter, please contact the appropriate
 
regional office or this office.
 
~4M zlgned #1 Richard Cunningham, Director
 
Division of Industrial and
 
Medical Nuclear Safety
 
Office of Nuclear Material Safety
 
and Safeguards


===Technical Contact:===
===Technical Contact:===
Sally Merchant, NMSS(301) 492-0637


===Attachments:===
===Sally Merchant, NMSS===
1. List of Recently Issued NMSSInformation Notices.2. List of Recently Issued NRCInformation Notices.E. Kraus/Tech. Ed.8/21/901311}}
                    (301) 492-0637 Attachments:
1. List of Recently Issued NMSS
 
Information Notices.
 
2. List of Recently Issued NRC
 
Information Notices.
 
E. Kraus/Tech. Ed.
 
8/21/90
                                    1311}}


{{Information notice-Nav}}
{{Information notice-Nav}}

Latest revision as of 04:03, 24 November 2019

Errors in Use of Radioactive Iodine-131
ML031130270
Person / Time
Site: Beaver Valley, Millstone, Hatch, Monticello, Calvert Cliffs, Dresden, Davis Besse, Peach Bottom, Browns Ferry, Salem, Oconee, Mcguire, Nine Mile Point, Palisades, Palo Verde, Perry, Indian Point, Fermi, Kewaunee, Catawba, Harris, Wolf Creek, Saint Lucie, Point Beach, Oyster Creek, Watts Bar, Hope Creek, Grand Gulf, Cooper, Sequoyah, Byron, Pilgrim, Arkansas Nuclear, Three Mile Island, Braidwood, Susquehanna, Summer, Prairie Island, Columbia, Seabrook, Brunswick, Surry, Limerick, North Anna, Turkey Point, River Bend, Vermont Yankee, Crystal River, Haddam Neck, Ginna, Diablo Canyon, Callaway, Vogtle, Waterford, Duane Arnold, Farley, Robinson, Clinton, South Texas, San Onofre, Cook, Comanche Peak, Yankee Rowe, Maine Yankee, Quad Cities, Humboldt Bay, La Crosse, Big Rock Point, Rancho Seco, Zion, Midland, Bellefonte, Fort Calhoun, FitzPatrick, McGuire, LaSalle, Fort Saint Vrain, Shoreham, Satsop, Trojan, Atlantic Nuclear Power Plant  Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 09/17/1990
From: Cunningham R
NRC/NMSS/IMNS
To:
References
IN-90-059, NUDOCS 9009120156
Download: ML031130270 (8)


UNITED STATES

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF NUCLEAR MATERIALS SAFETY AND SAFEGUARDS

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555 September 17, 1990

NRC INFORMATION NOTICE NO. 90-59: ERRORS IN THE USE OF RADIOACTIVE IODINE-131

Addressees

All medical licensees.

Purpose

This information notice is intended to emphasize to medical use licensees the

potential radiation dose levels resulting from errors in the administration

of iodine-131 to humans. This issue was previously addressed in IE Information

Notice No. 85-61, Suppliment 1: Misadministrations To Patients Undergoing

Thyroid Scans (attached). Due to the significance and frequency of recurrence

of these errors, NRC believes this issue should be readdressed. It is expected

that licensees will review this information for application to their own procedures

for the administration of iodine-131, distribute the notice to those responsible

for radiation safety and quality assurance, and consider actions, if appropriate, to establish procedures to preclude the misadministration of iodine-131 at their

facilities. However, suggestions contained in this notice do not constitute any

new U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) requirements, and no written

response is required.

Description of Circumstances

The following cases are recent events reported to NRC that have resulted in

unintended radiation doses to humans, as a result of the administration of

radioactive iodine:

Case 1: A patient with a history of thyroid cancer was scheduled for her

yearly whole-body scan. Before the scan, the patient underwent a pregnancy

test, with negative results. After the pregnancy test results were received, the technologist began to complete a departmental questionnaire to obtain

information from the patient relative to the requested procedure. The

questionnaire addressed the possibilities of pregnancy and lactation. However, before completing the questionnaire, the technologist was called away and did

not return to complete the form before administration of the iodine-131. As

a result, the patient was given the intended dosage of 4.89 millicuries of

iodine-131. Approximately 48 hours5.555556e-4 days <br />0.0133 hours <br />7.936508e-5 weeks <br />1.8264e-5 months <br /> later when the patient was scanned, there

was considerable iodine-131 uptake in her breasts. When questioned by the

physician, the patient indicated that she had given birth to a female the infant

two weeks earlier and had been nursing this infant for approximately last

36 hours4.166667e-4 days <br />0.01 hours <br />5.952381e-5 weeks <br />1.3698e-5 months <br />. The total body dose to the infant was estimated to be 17 rads, and the radiation dose to the infant's thyroid was estimated to be 30,000

rads. A synthetic thyroid hormone replacement has been prescribed for the

child, with scheduled periodic follow-ups. The unintended dose to the mother's

breasts was estimated to be 8.9 rads.

920156

>9_0we Z 4J

IN 90-59 September 17, 1990 Case 2: A patient to be scheduled for a thyroid scan was

millicuries of iodine-131 instead of the intended dosage ofadministered 3

300 microcuries of

iodine-123. The patient's physician called in the request for

a thyroid scan

to the secretary of the nuclear medicine department, who inadvertently

scheduled a whole-body scan. No written request from the physician

required. The dosage at this facility for a whole-body scan is was

3 of iodine-131, whereas the dosage for a thyroid scan is 300 microcuriesmillicuries

iodine-123. The estimated dose to the patient's thyroid gland of

error was 4700 rads. due to this

Case 3: A patient was scheduled for an ectopic thyroid evaluation, intended dosage of 100 microcuries of iodine-131. In completing with an

Medicine department referral sheet, the referring physician the Nuclear

incorrectly

requested a post-thyroidectomy neck scan. As a result, the patient

administered 1 millicurie of iodine-131, with an estimated dose was

thyroid of 1300 rads. to the

Case 4: A patient was scheduled for an ectopic thyroid evaluation, Intended dosage of 50 to 100 microcuries of iodine-131. The technologistwith an

consulted the department procedure manual that listed prescribed

dosages for

specific scans, and the dosage was incorrectly listed as 4.5 millicuries.

'result, the patient was administered 4.3 millicuries. The estimated As a

this patient's thyroid gland was 4300 rads. dose'to

Case 5: A patient was administered a dosage of 15 microcuries

Almost immediately following the administration, the patient of iodine-131.

technologist that she was approximately 4 to 5 weeks pregnant..indicated to the

The

failed to ask the patient if she was pregnant before the administration. technologist

patient had arrived at the department with a baby in her arms, The

technologist assumed that the patient was not pregnant. The and the

the fetus was estimated to be 2 to 4 millirem. Since the fetal total body dose to

incapable of concentrating iodine-131 until approximately 12 thyroid is

weeks

it was estimated that there was no additional dose to the fetal of gestation, thyroid.

DISCUSSION

All licensees are reminded of the importance of ensuring the

safe performance

of licensed activities, in accordance with NRC regulations, requirements

their licenses, and accepted medical practice. The forementioned of

illustrate: the lack of familiarity with appropriate thyroid cases

dosages; the necessity of consistently following quality control studies and

and a need to understand the significance of radiation doses procedures;

from the administration of millicuries versus microcuries of that result -

containing radioiodine. Specifically, the radiation dose radiopharmaceuticals

resulting from a dosage of one millicurie rather than one to the thyroid, microcurie of

j .

IN 90-59 September 17, 1990 radiation dose

iodine-131, is a one thousand-fold increase. In addition, the greater than

received from an activity of iodine-131 is approximately-100 fold illustrates

the dose from the same activity of iodine-123. The following table of iodine-131, the relationship between microcurie versus millicurie quantities and iodine-131, as well as the radiation dose differential between iodine-123 for three different age groups, with a thyroid uptake of 15 percent.

TABLE: A Comparison of IsQtopes and'Radiation Doses for

Various Age Groups Assuming 15% Uptake by the Thyroid*

Rads per uqi Rads per mCi

I-123 1-131 I-123 1-131

1 year old 0.07 7.40 70.3 7400

5 years old 0.04 4.07 40.0 4070

Adult 0.007 0.78 7.0 777

. . .

  • Based on information from ICRP-Publication No. 53 of errors.in

All workers should have a clear understanding of the significance therapeutic

scale when calculating and preparing diagnostic dosages versusthreshold at which

dosages of radiopharmaceuticals containing radioiodine. The on the age

a diagnostic dosage becomes a therapeutic dosage is low, and depends

thyroid gland.

of the patient and the percent uptake by the patient's radiation

Consequently, the potential for causing a significant, undesired when administering

dose to a patient's thyroid gland must always be kept in mind

iodine radiopharmaceuticals.

manufacturers

Licensees are reminded that the package inserts provided by the doses, contain information pertinent to both proper dosages and radiation

when reviewing imaging policies and procedures

and may be valuable resources should

for errors and inconsistencies. Nuclear medicine department procedures of

include provisions for questioning female patients about the possibility

pregnancy or lactation. By attention to detail, and adherence to departmental may be

policy and procedures, many incidents involving radioactive iodine-131 avoided.

r- IN 90-59 September 17, 1990 No specific written response is required by this information

have any questions regarding this matter, please contact notice. If you

office or this office. the appropriate regional

M rCunnnhm, ro

Division of Industrial and

Medical Nuclear Safety

Office of Nuclear Material Safety

and Safeguards

Technical Contact:

Sally Merchant, NMSS

(301) 492-0637- Attachments:

1. List of Recently Issued NMSS

Information Notices.

2. List of Recently Issued NRC

Information Notices.

Attachment 1 IN 90-59 September 17, 1990 LIST OF RECENTLY ISSUED

HMSS INFORMATION NOTICES

Information Date of

Notice No. Subject Issuance Issued to:

90-50 Minimization of Methane Gas 08/08/90 All holders of operating

in Plant Systems and Radwaste licenses or construction

Shipping Containers permits for nuclear power

reactors

90-44 Dose-Rate Instruments 06/29/90 All NRC licensees

90-38 Requirements for Processing 05/29/90 All fuel facility

Financial Assurance Submittals and materials

for Decommissioning

90-35 Transportation of Type A 05/24/90 All U.S. Nuclear

- Quantities of Non-Fissile Regulatory Commission

Radioactive Materials (NRC) Licensees

90-31 Update on Waste Form and 05/04/90 All holders of operating

High Integrity Container licenses or construction

Topical Report Review Status, permits for nuclear power

Identification of Problems reactors, fuel cycle

with Cement Solidication, and licenses, and certain

Reporting of Waste Mishaps byproduct materials

licenses

90-27 Clarification of the 04/30/90 All Uranium Fuel

Recent Revisions to the Fabrication and Conversion

Regulatory Requirements Facilities

for Packaging of Uranium

Hexafluoride (UF6 ) for

Transportation

90-24 Transportation of Model 04/10/90 All NRC licensees

SPEC 2-T Radiographic authorized to use, Exposure Device transport, or operate

radiographic exposure

devices and source

changers

90-20 Personnel Injuries 03/22/90 All NRC licensees

Resulting from Improper who process or incinerate

Operation of Radwaste radioactive waste

Incinerators

- - Attachment 2 -

IN-90-59 !

September 17, 1990

. LIST OF RECENTLY ISSUED

NRC INFORMATION NOTICES

Information Date of

Notice No. Subject Issuance Issued to

90-58 Improper Handling of 9/11/90 All NRC medical

Ophthalmic Strontium-90 licensees.

Beta Radiation Applicators

90-57 Substandard, Refurbished 9/5/90 All holders of OLs

Potter & Brumfield Relays or CPs for nuclear

Misrepresented As New power reactors.

90-56 Inadvertent Shipment of A 9/4/90 All U.S. Nuclear

Radioactive Source In A Regulatory Com- Container Thought To Be mission (NRC)

Empty licensees.

90-55 Recent Operating Experi- 8/31/90 All holders of OLs

ence on Loss of Reactor or CPs for nuclear

Coolant Inventory While power reactors.

In A Shutdown Condition

83-44 Potential Damage to 8/30/90 All holders of OLs

Supp. 1 Redundant Safety Equip- or CPs for nuclear

ment As A Result of power reactors.

Backflow Through the

Equipment and Floor Drain

System

90-54 Summary of Requalification 8/28/90 All holders of GLs

Program Deficiencies or CPs for nuclear

power reactors.

89-18 Criminal Prosecution of 8/24/90 All holders of OLs

Supp. 1 Wrongdoing Committed by or CPs for nuclear

Suppliers of Nuclear power reactors.

Products or Services

90-53 Potential Failures of 8/16/90 All holders of OLs

Auxiliary Steam Piping and or CPs for nuclear

the Possible Effects on the power reactors.

Operability of Vital Equip- ment

OL = Operating License

CP = Construction Permit

IN 90-

September ,1990 No specific written response is required by this information notice. If you

have any questions regarding this matter, please contact the appropriate

regional office or this office.

~4M zlgned #1 Richard Cunningham, Director

Division of Industrial and

Medical Nuclear Safety

Office of Nuclear Material Safety

and Safeguards

Technical Contact:

Sally Merchant, NMSS

(301) 492-0637 Attachments:

1. List of Recently Issued NMSS

Information Notices.

2. List of Recently Issued NRC

Information Notices.

E. Kraus/Tech. Ed.

8/21/90

1311