|
|
| Line 16: |
Line 16: |
|
| |
|
| =Text= | | =Text= |
| {{#Wiki_filter:RULESi D7IJClTVES I ,!, E ! ' ,-I 'en 'V': Suzanne Maisner Chief, Rules and Directives Branch Division of Administrative Services (Iffir.~n | | {{#Wiki_filter:RULESi D7IJClTVES I ,!, E! ' ,- |
| ^f A,4minic+rnfir~n 397 N. Farms Road FEtorqnce_ | | I 'en 'V': |
| 4A, pr(6w 20oo6 (Er( I S v l rl lo l ul l l lQl4l lo l itm U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission RF(/+-g `;-Washington, D.C. 20555 -0001 RE: Federal Register/
| | Suzanne Maisner 397 N. Farms Road FEtorqnce_ 4A, pr(6w Chief, Rules and Directives Branch 20oo6 (Er( I S Division of Administrative Services (Iffir.~n ^f A,4minic+rnfir~n v l rl lol ul lllQl4l lo l U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission RF(/+-g `;-itm-I'F Washington, D.C. 20555 - 0001 RE: Federal Register/ Vol. 71, No. 7 / Wednesday, January 11, 2006 pg. 1774 I am writing during this public comment period regarding the uprate proposed by the Entergy Corporation of the Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Plant. This-plant is about 45 miles north of the town I recently moved to. Had I known that there was a possibility of an extension of operations of this plant, I would not have moved here. If it is approved, I definitely will not be buying property in this region due to safety concerns and property values. In all liklihood, I will relocate. It's just that scary to someone who understands probability, statistics and cold, hard facts. |
| Vol. 71, No. 7 / Wednesday, January 11, 2006 pg. 1774-I'F I am writing during this public comment period regarding the uprate proposed by the Entergy Corporation of the Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Plant. This-plant is about 45 miles north of the town I recently moved to. Had I known that there was a possibility of an extension of operations of this plant, I would not have moved here. If it is approved, I definitely will not be buying property in this region due to safety concerns and property values. In all liklihood, I will relocate. | | My background is in economics and technology with a focus on risk assessment and business continuity planning. The risk assessments released by the NRC are based on faulty assumptions beginning with the operating premise that the plant is new. It extrapolates from there. An independent assessment should be done on safety margins based on the age of the reactor and its operating history. |
| It's just that scary to someone who understands probability, statistics and cold, hard facts.My background is in economics and technology with a focus on risk assessment and business continuity planning. | | There are a number of other concerns I have with the assessment. Everything points to a report with a predetermined outcome favoring the Entergy Corporation. Please do the professional and right thing by commissioning a genuinely independent safety assessment so that those of us living in the region can make decisions based on an objective assessment based on objective, fact-based measurements . |
| The risk assessments released by the NRC are based on faulty assumptions beginning with the operating premise that the plant is new. It extrapolates from there. An independent assessment should be done on safety margins based on the age of the reactor and its operating history.There are a number of other concerns I have with the assessment. | | Sirjcerely, 1 - i Suzanne Maisner lo) .. |
| Everything points to a report with a predetermined outcome favoring the Entergy Corporation. | | _ -Al Av 6- $ 9yf-v}} |
| Please do the professional and right thing by commissioning a genuinely independent safety assessment so that those of us living in the region can make decisions based on an objective assessment based on objective, fact-based measurements | |
| .Sirjcerely, 1 -i Suzanne Maisner lo) .._ -Al Av -6$ 9yf-v}}
| |
|
|---|
Category:General FR Notice Comment Letter
MONTHYEARML17179A2462017-06-22022 June 2017
Comment (4) of Schuyler Gould Regarding Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station; Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.; Consideration of Approval of Transfer of License and Conforming Amendment
ML17179A2452017-06-21021 June 2017
Comment (3) of Anonymous Regarding Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station; Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.; Consideration of Approval of Transfer of License and Conforming Amendment
ML17163A0882017-06-0303 June 2017
Comment (2) of Robert Oeser on Vermont Yankee Power Station; Energy Nuclear Operations, Inc.; Consideration of Approval of Transfer of License and Conforming Amendment
ML17163A0872017-05-29029 May 2017
Comment (1) of Richard Holschuh on Behalf of Elnu Abenaki Tribe on Vermont Yankee Power Station; Energy Nuclear Operations, Inc.; Consideration of Approval of Transfer of License and Conforming Amendment
ML15159A1832015-06-0101 June 2015
Comment (2) of Kyle Landis-Marinello on Behalf of State of VT on Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.; Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station; Draft Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact; Request for Comment
ML15159A1842015-06-0101 June 2015
Comment (3) of Sandra and Charles Kosterman Opposing Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.; Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station; Draft Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact; Request for Comment
ML15138A0942015-05-0101 May 2015
Comment (1) of Clay Turnbull on Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.; Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station; Draft Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact; Request for Comment
ML15096A4582015-03-23023 March 2015
Comment (36) by Louise Amyot on NRC-2015-0004 Re Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report
ML15096A4422015-03-23023 March 2015
Comment (31) by Wendy Lapointe on NRC-2015-0004 Re Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report
ML15096A4522015-03-23023 March 2015
Comment (35) by Carol Levin on NRC-2015-0004 Re Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report
ML15096A4472015-03-23023 March 2015
Comment (34) by Virginia Hastings on NRC-2015-0004 Re Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report
ML15096A4452015-03-23023 March 2015
Comment (33) by John Cevasco on NRC-2015-0004 Re Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report
ML15096A4432015-03-23023 March 2015
Comment (32) by Charles Kosterman on NRC-2015-0004 Re Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report
ML15096A4402015-03-23023 March 2015
Comment (30) by Thomas Gajewski on NRC-2015-0004 Re Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report
ML15096A4392015-03-23023 March 2015
Comment (29) of Maggie Gunderson on NRC-2015-0004 Re Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report
ML15096A4382015-03-23023 March 2015
Comment (28) by Beth Watrous on NRC-2015-0004 Re Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report
ML15096A4372015-03-23023 March 2015
Comment (27) by John Tuthill on NRC-2015-0004 Re Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report
ML15096A4362015-03-23023 March 2015
Comment (26) by Nancy Hazard on NRC-2015-0004 Re Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report
ML15096A4352015-03-23023 March 2015
Comment (25) by Anonymous Individual on NRC-2015-0004 Re Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report
ML15096A4342015-03-23023 March 2015
Comment (24) by Erik Hoffner on NRC-2015-0004 Re Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report
ML15096A4332015-03-23023 March 2015
Comment (23) by Constance Harvard on NRC-2015-0004 Re Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report
ML15096A4322015-03-23023 March 2015
Comment (22) by David Jacke on NRC-2015-0004 Re Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report
ML15096A4602015-03-23023 March 2015
Comment (38) by Suzanne Carlson on NRC-2015-0004 Re Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report
ML15096A4612015-03-23023 March 2015
Comment (39) by Michael Rice on NRC-2015-0004 Re Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report
ML15096A4622015-03-23023 March 2015
Comment (40) by Susan Pelis on NRC-2015-0004 Re Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report
ML15096A4632015-03-23023 March 2015
Comment (41) by Elyssa Serrilli on NRC-2015-0004 Re Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report
ML15096A4592015-03-23023 March 2015
Comment (37) by Loren Kramer on NRC-2015-0004 Re Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report
ML15096A4652015-03-23023 March 2015
Comment (43) by Tim Murphy on NRC-2015-0004 Re Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report
ML15096A4292015-03-22022 March 2015
Comment (19) by Leslie Sachs on NRC-2015-0004 Re Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report
ML15096A4302015-03-22022 March 2015
Comment (20) by Jon King on NRC-2015-0004 Re Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report
ML15096A4642015-03-22022 March 2015
Comment (42) by Nancy Meagher on NRC-2015-0004 Re Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report
ML15096A4672015-03-20020 March 2015
Comment (17) by Anonymous Individual on NRC-2015-0004 Re Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report
ML15096A4692015-03-20020 March 2015
Comment (16) by Ulrike Von Molrke on NRC-2015-0004 Re Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report
ML15082A0502015-03-20020 March 2015
Comment (4) of Anonymous Individual on Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report
ML15084A2242015-03-20020 March 2015
Comment (13) of Clay Turnbull Request for Extension of Time to File Public Comments
ML15096A4662015-03-20020 March 2015
Comment (44) by Christopher Williams on NRC-2015-0004 Re Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report
ML15096A4272015-03-20020 March 2015
Comment (18) by Nancy First on NRC-2015-0004 Re Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report
ML15097A0792015-03-19019 March 2015
Comment (2) by State of Vermont on NRC-2015-0029, Applications and Amendments to Facility Operating Licenses and Combined Licenses Involving No Significant Hazards Considerations
ML15091A2552015-03-19019 March 2015
Comment (14) of Peter B. Elwell on Behalf of Town of Brattleboro on Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report
ML15096A4682015-03-18018 March 2015
Comment (15) by an Anonymous Individual on NRC-2015-0004 Re Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report
ML15082A0662015-03-18018 March 2015
Comment (12) of Susan Lantz on Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report
ML15082A0652015-03-17017 March 2015
Comment (11) of Bob Dickerman on Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report
ML15082A0632015-03-15015 March 2015
Comment (10) of Anne Stevens on Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report
ML15082A0622015-03-15015 March 2015
Comment (9) of Sue Prent on Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report
ML15082A0612015-03-13013 March 2015
Comment (8) of D. Brigham on Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report
ML15082A0602015-03-12012 March 2015
Comment (7) of Robert Oeser Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report
ML15082A2342015-03-0606 March 2015
Comment (6) by William Irwin, on Behalf of State of Vermont Department of Health, Re Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report
ML15082A0592015-02-27027 February 2015
Comment (5) of Valerie Stuart on Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., Venriont Yankee Nuclear Power Station Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report
ML15082A0492015-02-19019 February 2015
Comment (3) of Norton Garber on Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report
ML15049A0332015-02-0909 February 2015
Comment (24) of Shauna Lynn Opposing Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station; License Amendment Aplication; Reopening of Public Comment Period
2017-06-03
[Table view] |
Text
RULESi D7IJClTVES I ,!, E! ' ,-
I 'en 'V':
Suzanne Maisner 397 N. Farms Road FEtorqnce_ 4A, pr(6w Chief, Rules and Directives Branch 20oo6 (Er( I S Division of Administrative Services (Iffir.~n ^f A,4minic+rnfir~n v l rl lol ul lllQl4l lo l U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission RF(/+-g `;-itm-I'F Washington, D.C. 20555 - 0001 RE: Federal Register/ Vol. 71, No. 7 / Wednesday, January 11, 2006 pg. 1774 I am writing during this public comment period regarding the uprate proposed by the Entergy Corporation of the Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Plant. This-plant is about 45 miles north of the town I recently moved to. Had I known that there was a possibility of an extension of operations of this plant, I would not have moved here. If it is approved, I definitely will not be buying property in this region due to safety concerns and property values. In all liklihood, I will relocate. It's just that scary to someone who understands probability, statistics and cold, hard facts.
My background is in economics and technology with a focus on risk assessment and business continuity planning. The risk assessments released by the NRC are based on faulty assumptions beginning with the operating premise that the plant is new. It extrapolates from there. An independent assessment should be done on safety margins based on the age of the reactor and its operating history.
There are a number of other concerns I have with the assessment. Everything points to a report with a predetermined outcome favoring the Entergy Corporation. Please do the professional and right thing by commissioning a genuinely independent safety assessment so that those of us living in the region can make decisions based on an objective assessment based on objective, fact-based measurements .
Sirjcerely, 1 - i Suzanne Maisner lo) ..
_ -Al Av 6- $ 9yf-v
