ML091980299: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:,,,OBe-WT"H~ELD | {{#Wiki_filter:,,,OBe-WT"H~ELD 110lN,5 | ||
110lN,5 G:\DRS\Engineering | G:\DRS\Engineering Branch 1\_LicRenewal\Oyster Creek\2008 Outage\lnReport\OC 2008-07 | ||
Branch 1\_LicRenewal\Oyster | LRIrev-2A Upfront Guts.doc | ||
Creek\2008 | Conte Input for Upfront Guts of Report | ||
Outage\lnReport\OC | Dear Mr. Pardee | ||
2008-07 LRIrev-2A | On December 23, 2008, the U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed an | ||
Upfront Guts.doc Conte Input for Upfront Guts of Report Dear Mr. Pardee On December 23, 2008, the U. S. Nuclear Regulatory | inspection at your Oyster Creek Generating Station. The enclosed report documents the | ||
Commission (NRC) completed | inspection results, which were discussed on December 23, 2008, with Mr. T.. Rausch,. Site Vice | ||
President, Mr. M. Gallagher, Vice President License Renewal, and other members of your staff | |||
at your Oyster Creek Generating | in a telephone conference observed by representatives from the State of New Jersey. | ||
Station. The enclosed report documents | Part 50 results | ||
With respect to activities authorized by 10 CFR 50, the inspectors found no findings of safety | |||
results, which were discussed | significance. | ||
on December 23, 2008, with Mr. T.. Rausch,. Site Vice President, Mr. M. Gallagher, Vice President | With respect to 10 CFR 54 activities, we observed and have come to understand that you are | ||
License Renewal, and other members of your staff in a telephone | implementing regulatory commitments as listed in Appendix A of NUREG 1845 (ml ........ ) and | ||
conference | the proposed license conditions of that document as though you have an approved renewed | ||
observed by representatives | operating license. We also noted that the proposed license conditions of NUREG 1845 for | ||
from the State of New Jersey.Part 50 results With respect to activities | license renewal have evolved to that listed as Attachment 1 of SECY 08-XXX (ml ........... ) As | ||
authorized | an example, the proposed license condition XXX indicated that you will be sending in a | ||
by 10 CFR 50, the inspectors | readiness letter to indicate readiness for inspection, this was not in the proposed license | ||
found no findings of safety significance. | condition of NUREG 1845C. (b)(5) | ||
With respect to 10 CFR 54 activities, we observed and have come to understand | (b)(5) Ifi ý"' | ||
that you are implementing | (b)(5) | ||
regulatory | I | ||
commitments | Further, as you well know, an appeal of a licensing board decision regarding the Oyster Creek | ||
as listed in Appendix A of NUREG 1845 (ml ........ ) and the proposed license conditions | application for a renewed license is pending before the Commission related to the adequacy of | ||
of that document as though you have an approved renewed operating | the aging management program for the Oyster Creek drywell. | ||
license. We also noted that the proposed license conditions | The midcycle letter of ................ Indicated that the inspections of | ||
of NUREG 1845 for license renewal have evolved to that listed as Attachment | - (b)(5) | ||
1 of SECY 08-XXX (ml ........... ) As an example, the proposed license condition | 7z4 ý | ||
XXX indicated | The NRC is conducting these inspections using the guidance of Inspection Procedure (IP) | ||
that you will be sending in a readiness | 71003 "Post-Approval Site Inspection for License Renewal" as a prudent measure in order to | ||
letter to indicate readiness | take the opportunity to make observations of Oyster Creek license renewal activities during the | ||
for inspection, this was not in the proposed license condition | last refuel outage prior to entering the period of extended operation. The inspectors reviewed | ||
of NUREG 1845C. (b)(5)(b)(5)Ifi ý"'(b)(5)I Further, as you well know, an appeal of a licensing | selected procedures and records, observed activities, and interviewed personnel. | ||
board decision regarding | (b)(5) | ||
the Oyster Creek application | ÷ , / | ||
for a renewed license is pending before the Commission | kibWrAdw, hithsreconwas delugedm | ||
related to the adequacy of the aging management | Woedac with the reedom of Informago ftL | ||
program for the Oyster Creek drywell.The midcycle letter of ................ | Exemptions | ||
Indicated | &175- -7 | ||
that the inspections | FOIN"PA AOC -j o | ||
these inspections | A-3 | ||
using the guidance of Inspection | (b)(5) | ||
Procedure (IP)71003 "Post-Approval | I ;)I | ||
Site Inspection | |||
for License Renewal" as a prudent measure in order to take the opportunity | A-4 | ||
to make observations | The enclosed report records the inspector's observations, absent any determinations on | ||
of Oyster Creek license renewal activities | adequacy or significance. We are doing this because the proposed regulatory commitments | ||
during the last refuel outage prior to entering the period of extended operation. | made as a part of the 10 CFR 54 application are not in effect pending the final licensing action | ||
The inspectors | by the Director of NRR in conjunction with Commissioners' decision on the appeal of the | ||
hearing issue. If you have any questions in this regard, please let us know. | |||
and records, observed activities, and interviewed | Further, the observation of your activities with respect to proposed activities for license renewal | ||
personnel.(b)(5)÷ , /kibWrAdw, hithsreconwas | indicated that implementation did not go as expected associated with certain proposed | ||
regulatory commitments. These dealt with the installation of the strippable coating, the | |||
monitoring of the cavity drain trough drain, and the monitoring of the sand bed drains. At the | |||
FOIN"PA AOC -j o | exit meeting of December 23, 2008, you indicated that you were conducting a common cause | ||
A-3 (b)(5)I ;) | analysis in addition to placing this information into your corrective action process, at a minimum, | ||
A-4 The enclosed report records the inspector's | for future enhancement. With respect to the current situation for your 10 CFR 50 activities, we | ||
observations, absent any determinations | continue to believe that it is prudent for us to continue conducting observations of your license | ||
renewal activities and we plan a team inspection starting March 9, 2009 using the same | |||
We are doing this because the proposed regulatory | guidance for this inspection " (b)(5) (b)(5) | ||
commitments | (b)(5) J | ||
made as a part of the 10 CFR 54 application | In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter and its | ||
are not in effect pending the final licensing | enclosure will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document | ||
Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRC's document system | |||
with Commissioners' | (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web-site at | ||
decision on the appeal of the hearing issue. If you have any questions | http://www.nrc.gov/NRC/ADAMS/index.htmi (the Public Electronic Reading Room), | ||
in this regard, please let us know.Further, the observation | IN LIGHT OF THE REUESTS FOR INFORMATION DD SHOULD SIGN | ||
of your activities | Sincerely, | ||
with respect to proposed activities | Darrell Roberts, Director | ||
for license renewal indicated | Division of Reactor Safety | ||
that implementation | |||
did not go as expected associated | A-5 | ||
with certain proposed regulatory | REPORT DETAILS | ||
commitments. | 4. OTHER ACTIVITIES (OA) | ||
These dealt with the installation | 4OA2 License Renewal Follow-up (IP 71003) | ||
of the strippable | 1. Background | ||
coating, the monitoring | Because the application for a renewed license remains under Commission review for final | ||
of the cavity drain trough drain, and the monitoring | decision, and a renewed license has not been approved for Oyster Creek, the standards used | ||
of the sand bed drains. At the exit meeting of December 23, 2008, you indicated | to judge the adequacy of selected IP 71003 inspection samples do not apply. | ||
that you were conducting | This inspection was conducted in order to observe AmerGen's continuing license renewal | ||
a common cause analysis in addition to placing this information | activities during the last refueling outage prior to Oyster Creek (OC) entering the extended | ||
into your corrective | period of operation. | ||
action process, at a minimum, for future enhancement. | Accordingly, the inspectors recorded observations, without any assessment of implementation | ||
With respect to the current situation | |||
for your 10 CFR 50 activities, we continue to believe that it is prudent for us to continue conducting | |||
observations | |||
of your license renewal activities | |||
and we plan a team inspection | |||
starting March 9, 2009 using the same guidance for this inspection " (b)(5) (b)(5)(b)(5) J In accordance | |||
with 10 CFR 2.790 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter and its enclosure | |||
will be available | |||
electronically | |||
for public inspection | |||
in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available | |||
Records (PARS) component | |||
of NRC's document system (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible | |||
from the NRC Web-site at http://www.nrc.gov/NRC/ADAMS/index.htmi (the Public Electronic | |||
Reading Room), IN LIGHT OF THE REUESTS FOR INFORMATION | |||
DD SHOULD SIGN Sincerely, Darrell Roberts, Director Division of Reactor Safety | |||
A-5 REPORT DETAILS 4. OTHER ACTIVITIES (OA)4OA2 License Renewal Follow-up (IP 71003)1. Background | |||
Because the application | |||
for a renewed license remains under Commission | |||
review for final decision, and a renewed license has not been approved for Oyster Creek, the standards | |||
samples do not apply.This inspection | |||
was conducted | |||
in order to observe AmerGen's | |||
continuing | |||
license renewal activities | |||
during the last refueling | |||
outage prior to Oyster Creek (OC) entering the extended period of operation. | |||
Accordingly, the inspectors | |||
recorded observations, without any assessment | |||
of implementation | |||
adequacy or safety significance. | adequacy or safety significance. | ||
IP 71003 verifies license conditions | IP 71003 verifies license conditions added as part of a renewed license, license renewal | ||
added as part of a renewed license, license renewal commitments, selected aging management | commitments, selected aging management programs, and license renewal commitments | ||
programs, and license renewal commitments | revised after the renewed license was granted, are implemented in accordance with Title 10 of | ||
revised after the renewed license was granted, are implemented | the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 54, "Requirements for the Renewal of Operating | ||
in accordance | Licenses for Nuclear Power Plants." | ||
with Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 54, "Requirements | 2. Inspection Sample Selection Process | ||
for the Renewal of Operating Licenses for Nuclear Power Plants." 2. Inspection | The. inspection team selected a number of inspection samples for review, using the NRC | ||
Sample Selection | accepted guidance based on their importance in the license renewal application | ||
process, as an opportunity to make observations on license renewal activities. | |||
team selected a number of inspection | Inspection observations were considered, in light of pending 10 CFR 54 license renewal | ||
samples for review, using the NRC accepted guidance based on their importance | commitments and license conditions, as documented in NUREG-1875, "Safety | ||
in the license renewal application | Evaluation Report (SER) Related to the License Renewal of Oyster Creek Generating | ||
process, as an opportunity | Station," as well as programmatic performance under on-going implementation of 10 | ||
to make observations | CFR 50 current licensing basis (CLB) requirements. | ||
on license renewal activities. | The reviewed SER proposed commitments and license conditions were selected based | ||
Inspection | on several attributes including: the risk significance using insights gained from sources | ||
observations | such as the NRC's "Significance Determination Process Risk Informed Inspection | ||
were considered, in light of pending 10 CFR 54 license renewal commitments | Notebooks," revision 2; the extent and results of previous license renewal audits and | ||
and license conditions, as documented | inspections of aging management programs; the extent or complexity of a commitment; | ||
in NUREG-1875, "Safety Evaluation | and the extent that baseline inspection programs will inspect a system, structure, or | ||
Report (SER) Related to the License Renewal of Oyster Creek Generating | component (SSC), or commodity group. | ||
Station," as well as programmatic | For each commitment and on a sampling basis, the inspectors reviewed supporting | ||
performance | |||
under on-going implementation | A-6 | ||
of 10 CFR 50 current licensing | documents including completed surveillances, conducted interviews, performed visual | ||
basis (CLB) requirements. | inspection of structures and components including those not accessible during power | ||
The reviewed SER proposed commitments | operation, and observed selected activities described below. The inspectors also | ||
and license conditions | reviewed selected corrective actions taken as a consequence of previous license | ||
were selected based on several attributes | renewal inspections. | ||
including: | |||
the risk significance | A-7 | ||
using insights gained from sources such as the NRC's "Significance | I . . I | ||
Determination | A-8 | ||
Process Risk Informed Inspection | 3. Review Details | ||
Notebooks," revision 2; the extent and results of previous license renewal audits and inspections | 3.1 NRC Unresolved Item | ||
of aging management | 10 CFR 50 existing requirements (e.g., current licensing basis (CLB) | ||
programs; | xxx USE words from PN | ||
the extent or complexity | * The conclusions of PNO-1-08-012 remain unchanged | ||
of a commitment; | " An Unresolved Item (URI) will be opened to evaluate whether existing current licensing basis | ||
and the extent that baseline inspection | commitments were adequately performed and, if necessary, assess the safety significance for | ||
programs will inspect a system, structure, or component (SSC), or commodity | any related performance deficiency. | ||
group.For each commitment | * The issues for follow-up include the strippable coating de-lamination, reactor cavity trough | ||
and on a sampling basis, the inspectors | drain monitoring, and sand bed drain monitoring. | ||
reviewed supporting | e The commitment tracking, implementation, and work control processes will be reviewed, | ||
A-6 documents | based on corrective actions resulting from AmerGen's review of deficiencies and operating | ||
including | experience, as a Part 50 activity. | ||
completed | 3.2 Drywell Floor Trench Inspections | ||
surveillances, conducted | |||
interviews, performed | |||
of structures | |||
and components | |||
including | |||
those not accessible | |||
during power operation, and observed selected activities | |||
described | |||
below. The inspectors | |||
actions taken as a consequence | |||
of previous license renewal inspections. | |||
A-7 | |||
I ..I A-8 3. Review Details 3.1 NRC Unresolved | |||
basis (CLB)xxx USE words from PN* The conclusions | |||
of PNO-1-08-012 | |||
remain unchanged" An Unresolved | |||
Item (URI) will be opened to evaluate whether existing current licensing | |||
were adequately | |||
performed | |||
and, if necessary, assess the safety significance | |||
deficiency. | |||
* The issues for follow-up | |||
include the strippable | |||
coating de-lamination, reactor cavity trough drain monitoring, and sand bed drain monitoring. | |||
e The commitment | |||
tracking, implementation, and work control processes | |||
will be reviewed, based on corrective | |||
actions resulting | |||
from AmerGen's | |||
review of deficiencies | |||
and operating experience, as a Part 50 activity.3.2 Drywell Floor Trench Inspections | |||
}} | }} |
Latest revision as of 05:07, 14 November 2019
ML091980299 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Oyster Creek |
Issue date: | 06/17/2009 |
From: | Darrell Roberts Division of Reactor Safety I |
To: | Pardee C Exelon Generation Co |
References | |
FOIA/PA-2009-0070 IR-08-007 | |
Download: ML091980299 (7) | |
See also: IR 05000219/2008007
Text
,,,OBe-WT"H~ELD 110lN,5
G:\DRS\Engineering Branch 1\_LicRenewal\Oyster Creek\2008 Outage\lnReport\OC 2008-07
LRIrev-2A Upfront Guts.doc
Conte Input for Upfront Guts of Report
Dear Mr. Pardee
On December 23, 2008, the U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed an
inspection at your Oyster Creek Generating Station. The enclosed report documents the
inspection results, which were discussed on December 23, 2008, with Mr. T.. Rausch,. Site Vice
President, Mr. M. Gallagher, Vice President License Renewal, and other members of your staff
in a telephone conference observed by representatives from the State of New Jersey.
Part 50 results
With respect to activities authorized by 10 CFR 50, the inspectors found no findings of safety
significance.
With respect to 10 CFR 54 activities, we observed and have come to understand that you are
implementing regulatory commitments as listed in Appendix A of NUREG 1845 (ml ........ ) and
the proposed license conditions of that document as though you have an approved renewed
operating license. We also noted that the proposed license conditions of NUREG 1845 for
license renewal have evolved to that listed as Attachment 1 of SECY 08-XXX (ml ........... ) As
an example, the proposed license condition XXX indicated that you will be sending in a
readiness letter to indicate readiness for inspection, this was not in the proposed license
condition of NUREG 1845C. (b)(5)
(b)(5) Ifi ý"'
(b)(5)
I
Further, as you well know, an appeal of a licensing board decision regarding the Oyster Creek
application for a renewed license is pending before the Commission related to the adequacy of
the aging management program for the Oyster Creek drywell.
The midcycle letter of ................ Indicated that the inspections of
- (b)(5)
7z4 ý
The NRC is conducting these inspections using the guidance of Inspection Procedure (IP)
71003 "Post-Approval Site Inspection for License Renewal" as a prudent measure in order to
take the opportunity to make observations of Oyster Creek license renewal activities during the
last refuel outage prior to entering the period of extended operation. The inspectors reviewed
selected procedures and records, observed activities, and interviewed personnel.
(b)(5)
÷ , /
kibWrAdw, hithsreconwas delugedm
Woedac with the reedom of Informago ftL
Exemptions
&175- -7
FOIN"PA AOC -j o
A-3
(b)(5)
I ;)I
A-4
The enclosed report records the inspector's observations, absent any determinations on
adequacy or significance. We are doing this because the proposed regulatory commitments
made as a part of the 10 CFR 54 application are not in effect pending the final licensing action
by the Director of NRR in conjunction with Commissioners' decision on the appeal of the
hearing issue. If you have any questions in this regard, please let us know.
Further, the observation of your activities with respect to proposed activities for license renewal
indicated that implementation did not go as expected associated with certain proposed
regulatory commitments. These dealt with the installation of the strippable coating, the
monitoring of the cavity drain trough drain, and the monitoring of the sand bed drains. At the
exit meeting of December 23, 2008, you indicated that you were conducting a common cause
analysis in addition to placing this information into your corrective action process, at a minimum,
for future enhancement. With respect to the current situation for your 10 CFR 50 activities, we
continue to believe that it is prudent for us to continue conducting observations of your license
renewal activities and we plan a team inspection starting March 9, 2009 using the same
guidance for this inspection " (b)(5) (b)(5)
(b)(5) J
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter and its
enclosure will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document
Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRC's document system
(ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web-site at
http://www.nrc.gov/NRC/ADAMS/index.htmi (the Public Electronic Reading Room),
IN LIGHT OF THE REUESTS FOR INFORMATION DD SHOULD SIGN
Sincerely,
Darrell Roberts, Director
Division of Reactor Safety
A-5
REPORT DETAILS
4. OTHER ACTIVITIES (OA)
4OA2 License Renewal Follow-up (IP 71003)
1. Background
Because the application for a renewed license remains under Commission review for final
decision, and a renewed license has not been approved for Oyster Creek, the standards used
to judge the adequacy of selected IP 71003 inspection samples do not apply.
This inspection was conducted in order to observe AmerGen's continuing license renewal
activities during the last refueling outage prior to Oyster Creek (OC) entering the extended
period of operation.
Accordingly, the inspectors recorded observations, without any assessment of implementation
adequacy or safety significance.
IP 71003 verifies license conditions added as part of a renewed license, license renewal
commitments, selected aging management programs, and license renewal commitments
revised after the renewed license was granted, are implemented in accordance with Title 10 of
the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 54, "Requirements for the Renewal of Operating
Licenses for Nuclear Power Plants."
2. Inspection Sample Selection Process
The. inspection team selected a number of inspection samples for review, using the NRC
accepted guidance based on their importance in the license renewal application
process, as an opportunity to make observations on license renewal activities.
Inspection observations were considered, in light of pending 10 CFR 54 license renewal
commitments and license conditions, as documented in NUREG-1875, "Safety
Evaluation Report (SER) Related to the License Renewal of Oyster Creek Generating
Station," as well as programmatic performance under on-going implementation of 10
CFR 50 current licensing basis (CLB) requirements.
The reviewed SER proposed commitments and license conditions were selected based
on several attributes including: the risk significance using insights gained from sources
such as the NRC's "Significance Determination Process Risk Informed Inspection
Notebooks," revision 2; the extent and results of previous license renewal audits and
inspections of aging management programs; the extent or complexity of a commitment;
and the extent that baseline inspection programs will inspect a system, structure, or
component (SSC), or commodity group.
For each commitment and on a sampling basis, the inspectors reviewed supporting
A-6
documents including completed surveillances, conducted interviews, performed visual
inspection of structures and components including those not accessible during power
operation, and observed selected activities described below. The inspectors also
reviewed selected corrective actions taken as a consequence of previous license
renewal inspections.
A-7
I . . I
A-8
3. Review Details
3.1 NRC Unresolved Item
10 CFR 50 existing requirements (e.g., current licensing basis (CLB)
xxx USE words from PN
- The conclusions of PNO-1-08-012 remain unchanged
" An Unresolved Item (URI) will be opened to evaluate whether existing current licensing basis
commitments were adequately performed and, if necessary, assess the safety significance for
any related performance deficiency.
- The issues for follow-up include the strippable coating de-lamination, reactor cavity trough
drain monitoring, and sand bed drain monitoring.
e The commitment tracking, implementation, and work control processes will be reviewed,
based on corrective actions resulting from AmerGen's review of deficiencies and operating
experience, as a Part 50 activity.
3.2 Drywell Floor Trench Inspections