NL-11-0865, Annual Non-Radiological Environmental Operating Reports for 2010: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:Mark J. Ajluni, P.E. Southern Nuclear Nuclear Licensing Director Operating Company, Inc. 40 Inverness Center Post Office Box 1295 Birmingham, .Alabama 35201 Tel 205.992.7673 Fax 205.992.7885 SOUTHERN'\
{{#Wiki_filter:Mark J. Ajluni, P.E.       Southern Nuclear Nuclear Licensing Director Operating Company, Inc.
COMPANY April 30, 2011 Docket 50-321 50-348 50-424 NL-11-0865 50-366 50-364 50-425 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission A TIN: Document Control Desk Washington, D. C. 20555-0001 Edwin I. Hatch Nuclear Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Vogtle Electric Generating Annual Non-Radiological Environmental Operating Reports for Ladies and Gentlemen:
40 Inverness Center Post Office Box 1295 Birmingham, .Alabama 35201 Tel 205.992.7673 Fax 205.992.7885 SOUTHERN'\
In accordance with Subsection 5.4.1 of the referenced plants' Environmental Protection Plans (Appendix B to the Operating Licenses), Southern Nuclear Operating Company hereby submits the Annual Non-Radiological Environmental Operating Reports for 2010. This letter contains no NRC commitments.
COMPANY April 30, 2011 Docket Nos.: 50-321 50-348                   50-424               NL-11-0865 50-366 50-364         50-425 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATIN: Document Control Desk Washington, D. C. 20555-0001 Edwin I. Hatch Nuclear Plant Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant Vogtle Electric Generating Plant Annual Non-Radiological Environmental Operating Reports for 2010 Ladies and Gentlemen:
If you have any questions.
In accordance with Subsection 5.4.1 of the referenced plants' Environmental Protection Plans (Appendix B to the Operating Licenses), Southern Nuclear Operating Company hereby submits the Annual Non-Radiological Environmental Operating Reports for 2010.
please contact Jack Stringfellow at (205) 992-7037.
This letter contains no NRC commitments. If you have any questions. please contact Jack Stringfellow at (205) 992-7037.
Respectfully submitted, M. J. Ajluni Nuclear Licensing Director MJAlLPH/lac  
Respectfully submitted,
    ~&~
M. J. Ajluni Nuclear Licensing Director MJAlLPH/lac


==Enclosures:==
==Enclosures:==
: 1. Hatch Annual Non-Radiological Environmental Operating Report for 2010 2. Farley Annual Non-Radiological Environmental Operating Report for 2010 3. Vogtle Annual Non-Radiological Environmental Operating Report for 2010 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission NL-11-0865 Page 2 Southern Nuclear Operating Company Mr. J. T. Gasser, Executive Vice President Mr. L. M. Stinson, Vice President  
: 1. Hatch Annual Non-Radiological Environmental Operating Report for 2010
-Farley Mr. D. R. Madison, Vice President  
: 2. Farley Annual Non-Radiological Environmental Operating Report for 2010
-Hatch Mr. T. E. Tynan, Vice President  
: 3. Vogtle Annual Non-Radiological Environmental Operating Report for 2010
-Vogtle Ms. P. M. Marino, Vice President  
 
-Engineering RType: CFA04.054; CHA02.004; CVC7000 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mr. V.M. McCree, Regional Administrator Mr. R. Martin, NRR Project Manager -Farley, Hatch and Vogtle Mr. P. G. Boyle, NRR Project Manager Mr. E. L. Crowe, Senior Resident Inspector  
U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission NL-11-0865 Page 2 cc:  Southern Nuclear Operating Company Mr. J. T. Gasser, Executive Vice President Mr. L. M. Stinson, Vice President - Farley Mr. D. R. Madison, Vice President - Hatch Mr. T. E. Tynan, Vice President - Vogtle Ms. P. M. Marino, Vice President - Engineering RType: CFA04.054; CHA02.004; CVC7000 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mr. V.M. McCree, Regional Administrator Mr. R. Martin, NRR Project Manager - Farley, Hatch and Vogtle Mr. P. G. Boyle, NRR Project Manager Mr. E. L. Crowe, Senior Resident Inspector - Farley Mr. E. D. Morris, Senior Resident Inspector - Hatch Mr. M. Cain, Senior Resident Inspector - Vogtle
-Farley Mr. E. D. Morris, Senior Resident Inspector  
 
-Hatch Mr. M. Cain, Senior Resident Inspector  
Edwin I. Hatch Nuclear Plant Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant Vogtle Electric Generating Plant Annual Non-Radiological Environmental Operating Reports for 2010 Enclosure 1 Hatch Annual Non-Radiological Environmental Operating Report for 2010
-Vogtle Edwin I. Hatch Nuclear Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Vogtle Electric Generating Annual Non-Radiological Environmental Operating Reports for Enclosure 1 Hatch Annual Non-Radiological Environmental Operating Report for 2010 L Altadm1ent 1 Page I of2 Annual Non-Radiological Environmental Operating Reports for 2010 EDWIN I. HATCH NUCLEAR PLANT -UNITS 1 AND 2 Introduction This report is submitted in accordance with Subsection 5.4.1 of the Edwin L Hatch Nuclear Plant Environmental Protection Plan, Appendix B to Facility Operating Licenses DPR-57 and NPF-5. This report describes implementation orthe Environmental Protection Plan for the calendar year 2010. Reporting Requirements Summaries aDd Analyses of Results of Environmental Protection Activities Requin'd by Subsection 4.2 of tbe Environmental Protection Plan (EPP) for the Reporting Period I. Aquatic Monitoring  
 
-Liquid effluent monitoring was performed in accordance with the State of Georgia National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Pem1!l GA0004120; there was no additional requirement for aquatic monitoring during the year. 2. Terrestrial Monitoring  
Altadm1ent 1                                                                         Page I of2 Annual Non-Radiological Environmental Operating Reports for 2010 EDWIN I. HATCH NUCLEAR PLANT - UNITS 1 AND 2 L      Introduction This report is submitted in accordance with Subsection 5.4.1 of the Edwin L Hatch Nuclear Plant Environmental Protection Plan, Appendix B to Facility Operating Licenses DPR-57 and NPF-5. This report describes implementation orthe Environmental Protection Plan for the calendar year 2010.
-Terrestrial monitoring is not required. Maintenance of Transmission Line Corridors  
: n. Reporting Requirements A.      Summaries aDd Analyses of Results of Environmental Protection Activities Requin'd by Subsection 4.2 of tbe Environmental Protection Plan (EPP) for the Reporting Period I. Aquatic Monitoring - Liquid effluent monitoring was performed in accordance with the State of Georgia National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Pem1!l GA0004120; there was no additional requirement for aquatic monitoring during the year.
..... There is no repOliing requirement associated with this condition. Comparisons of tbe Year's Monitoring Activities with Preoperational Studies, Operational Controls, and Previous Nonrad;ological Environmental Monitoring Reports These comparisons were not required because no nonradiological environmental monitoring pro!:,'Tams were conducted during the reporting period beyond those performed ill accordance with NPDES Pem1it No. GA0004120. Assessment of the Observed Impacts of Plant Operation Oil the Envh'ollment There were no significant adverse environmental impacts associated with plant operation during the year. EPI" Noncompliance and Corrective Actions 'rhere wcre no EPP noncompliances during the year.
: 2. Terrestrial Monitoring - Terrestrial monitoring is not required.
Attachment 1 Page 2 of2 Annual Non-Radiological Environmental Operating Reports tor 2010 Chan2es in Station Design or Operation.
: 3. Maintenance of Transmission Line Corridors . . . There is no repOliing requirement associated with this condition.
Tests, or Experiments Made in Accordance with EPP Subsection 3.1 Which Involved a Potentially Significant Unreviewed Environmental Question There were no changes in station design or operation.
B.      Comparisons of tbe Year's Monitoring Activities with Preoperational Studies, Operational Controls, and Previous Nonrad;ological Environmental Monitoring Reports These comparisons were not required because no nonradiological environmental monitoring pro!:,'Tams were conducted during the reporting period beyond those performed ill accordance with NPDES Pem1it No.
tests, or experiments which involved a potentially significant, unreviewed environmental question. Nonroutine Reports Submitted in Accordance with EPP Section 5.4.2 There were no nonroutine repol1s submitted during the year.
GA0004120.
Edwin I. Hatch Nuclear Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Vogtle Electric Generating Annual Non-Radiological Environmental Operating Reports for Enclosure Farley Annual Non-Radiological Environment Operating Report for Attachment 2 Page I of 1 Annual Non-Radiological Environmental Operating Reports for 2010 .JOSEPH 1\'1. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT -UNITS 1 AND 2 Introduction Tn accordance with Subsection SA.I of the Joseph M. farley Nuclear Plant Environmental Protection Plan, Appendix B to Facility Operating License Nos. NPF-2 and KPF-8, I.his report is submitted summarizing implementation of the Enviromnental Protection Plan for calendar year 20 I O. Reporting Reguirements Summaries and Analyses of Results of Environmental Protection Activities Required by Subsection 4.2 of the Environmental Protection Plan (EPP) for tbe Reporting Period Aerial Remote Sensing -Aerial Remote Sensing is no longer required. Herbicide Application  
C.      Assessment of the Observed Impacts of Plant Operation Oil the Envh'ollment There were no significant adverse environmental impacts associated with plant operation during the year.
-There is no reporting requirement associated with this condition. Land Management  
D.      EPI" Noncompliance and Corrective Actions
-There is no reporting requirement associated with this condition. Comparison of the Year's Monitoring Activities wit.h Preoperational Studies, Operational Controls, and Previous Non-Radiological Monitoring Reports These comparisons were not required because no nonradiological environmenlal monitoring programs were conducted during the reporting period beyond those performed in accordance with NPDES Pennit No. AL00246 I 9. Assessment of the Observed Impacts of Plant Operation on the f:nvironment There were no significant adverse environmental impacts associated with plant operation during the year. EPP :"/oncompliance and Corrective Actions There were no EPP lIoncompl lances during the year. Changes in Station Design or Operation, Tests, or Experiments Made in Accordance with EPP Section 3.1 Wbich Involved a Potentially Significant Un reviewed Environmental Question There were no changes in shltion design or operation, tests. or experiments which involved a potentially significant, unreviewed enviromnemal question.
              'rhere wcre no EPP noncompliances during the year.
F. Nonroutine Reports Submitted in Accordance with EPP Section 5.4.2 There were no nonroutine reports submitted during the year.
Page 2 of2 Annual Non-Radiological Environmental Operating Reports tor 2010 E. Chan2es in Station Design or Operation. Tests, or Experiments Made in Accordance with EPP Subsection 3.1 Which Involved a Potentially Significant Unreviewed Environmental Question There were no changes in station design or operation. tests, or experiments which involved a potentially significant, unreviewed environmental question.
Edwin I. Hatch Nuclear Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Vogtle Electric Generating Annual Non-Radiological Environmental Operating Reports for Enclosure Vogtle Annual Non-Radiological Environmental Operating Report for Attachment J Page 101'2 Annual Non-Radiological Environmental Operating Reports for 2010 VOGTLE ELECTRIC PLANT -UNITS 1 AND 2 Introduction In accordance with Subsection 5.4.1 of the VObrtle Electric Generating Plant (VEGP) Environmental Protection Plan (Nollradiological).
F. Nonroutine Reports Submitted in Accordance with EPP Section 5.4.2 There were no nonroutine repol1s submitted during the year.
Appendix B to Facility Operating License Nos. NPF-68 and I\"l'F-8J, this report is submitted describing implementation  
 
\.)1' the Environmental Protection Plan for the calendar year 2010, Reporting Requirements Summaries and Analyses of Results of Environmental Protection Activities Required hy Subsection 4.2 of the Environmental Protection Plan (EPJ>> for the Reporting Period Aquatic Monitoring  
Edwin I. Hatch Nuclear Plant Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant Vogtle Electric Generating Plant Annual Non-Radiological Environmental Operating Reports for 2010 Enclosure 2 Farley Annual Non-Radiological Environment Operating Report for 2010 Page I of 1 Annual Non-Radiological Environmental Operating Reports for 2010
-Liquid effluent monitoring was performed in accordance with State of Genrgia National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Pennit GA0026786; there was no additional requirement for aquatic monitonng during the year, 'rcrrestrial Monitoring  
              .JOSEPH 1\'1. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT - UNITS 1 AND 2
-Terrestrial monitoring is not required. Maintenallce oCTransmission I ,inc Corridors There is no reporting requirement associated with this condition. Noise Monitoring There were no complaints reported regarding noise along the VEGP-related, high-voltage transmission lines, Comparison of the Year's Monitoring Activities with Preoperational Studies, Operational Controls, and Previous Monitoring Reports These programs were not required because no nonradiologicai environmental monitoring programs were conducted during the reporting period beyond those perfonned in accordance with NPDES Pennit No. GA0026786 referenced in Section A above. Assessment of the Observed Impacts of Plant Operation 011 the Environmt'nt  
: 1. Introduction Tn accordance with Subsection SA.I of the Joseph M. farley Nuclear Plant Environmental Protection Plan, Appendix B to Facility Operating License Nos. NPF-2 and KPF-8, I.his report is submitted summarizing implementation of the Enviromnental Protection Plan for calendar year 20 IO.
'rhere were nt) si&'nificant adverse envirornnental impacts associated with plant operation during tile year. EPP Noncompliance and Corrective Actions There were no EPP noncompliances during the year.
II. Reporting Reguirements A.      Summaries and Analyses of Results of Environmental Protection Activities Required by Subsection 4.2 of the Environmental Protection Plan (EPP) for tbe Reporting Period I. Aerial Remote Sensing - Aerial Remote Sensing is no longer required.
Attachment 3 Page 2 of2 Annual Non-Radiological Envirorunental Operating Reports for 2010 E. Changes in Station Design or Operation, Tests, or Experiments Made in Accordance with EPP Subsection 3.1 Which Involved a Potentially Significant Unreviewcd Environmental QlIestion There were no changes in station design or operation, tests, or experiments which involved a potentially significant, unreviewed environmental question, including activities related to the proposed VagLle Units 3 cU1d 4. I " '. Nonroutine Reports Submitted in Accordance with EPP Section 5.4.2 There were no nonroutine reports submitted during the yeHr,}}
: 2. Herbicide Application - There is no reporting requirement associated with this condition.
: 3. Land Management - There is no reporting requirement associated with this condition.
B.      Comparison of the Year's Monitoring Activities wit.h Preoperational Studies, Operational Controls, and Previous Non-Radiological Monitoring Reports These comparisons were not required because no nonradiological environmenlal monitoring programs were conducted during the reporting period beyond those performed in accordance with NPDES Pennit No.
AL00246 I 9.
C.      Assessment of the Observed Impacts of Plant Operation on the f:nvironment There were no significant adverse environmental impacts associated with plant operation during the year.
D.      EPP :"/oncompliance and Corrective Actions There were no EPP lIoncompl lances during the year.
E.      Changes in Station Design or Operation, Tests, or Experiments Made in Accordance with EPP Section 3.1 Wbich Involved a Potentially Significant Un reviewed Environmental Question There were no changes in shltion design or operation, tests. or experiments which involved a potentially significant, unreviewed enviromnemal question.
F.     Nonroutine Reports Submitted in Accordance with EPP Section 5.4.2 There were no nonroutine reports submitted during the year.
 
Edwin I. Hatch Nuclear Plant Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant Vogtle Electric Generating Plant Annual Non-Radiological Environmental Operating Reports for 2010 Enclosure 3 Vogtle Annual Non-Radiological Environmental Operating Report for 2010
 
Attachment J                                                                         Page 101'2 Annual Non-Radiological Environmental Operating Reports for 2010 VOGTLE ELECTRIC           GI<~NERATING      PLANT - UNITS 1 AND 2 I. Introduction In accordance with Subsection 5.4.1 of the VObrtle Electric Generating Plant (VEGP)
Environmental Protection Plan (Nollradiological). Appendix B to Facility Operating License Nos. NPF-68 and I\"l'F-8J, this report is submitted describing implementation   \.)1' the Environmental Protection Plan for the calendar year 2010, II. Reporting Requirements A.      Summaries and Analyses of Results of Environmental Protection Activities Required hy Subsection 4.2 of the Environmental Protection Plan (EPJ>> for the Reporting Period I. Aquatic Monitoring - Liquid effluent monitoring was performed in accordance with State of Genrgia National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Pennit GA0026786; there was no additional requirement for aquatic monitonng during the year,
: 2.  'rcrrestrial Monitoring - Terrestrial monitoring is not required.
J. Maintenallce oCTransmission I ,inc Corridors     There is no reporting requirement associated with this condition.
: 4. Noise Monitoring There were no complaints reported regarding noise along the VEGP-related, high-voltage transmission lines, B.      Comparison of the Year's Monitoring Activities with Preoperational Studies, Operational Controls, and Previous Monitoring Reports These programs were not required because no nonradiologicai environmental monitoring programs were conducted during the reporting period beyond those perfonned in accordance with NPDES Pennit No. GA0026786 referenced in Section A above.
C.      Assessment of the Observed Impacts of Plant Operation 011 the Environmt'nt
              'rhere were nt) si&'nificant adverse envirornnental impacts associated with plant operation during tile year.
D.      EPP Noncompliance and Corrective Actions There were no EPP noncompliances during the year.
Page 2 of2 Annual Non-Radiological Envirorunental Operating Reports for 2010 E. Changes in Station Design or Operation, Tests, or Experiments Made in Accordance with EPP Subsection 3.1 Which Involved a Potentially Significant Unreviewcd Environmental QlIestion There were no changes in station design or operation, tests, or experiments which involved a potentially significant, unreviewed environmental question, including activities related to the proposed VagLle Units 3 cU1d 4.
        "   Nonroutine Reports Submitted in Accordance with EPP Section 5.4.2 I '.
There were no nonroutine reports submitted during the yeHr,}}

Latest revision as of 01:22, 13 November 2019

Annual Non-Radiological Environmental Operating Reports for 2010
ML111220096
Person / Time
Site: Hatch, Vogtle, Farley  Southern Nuclear icon.png
Issue date: 04/30/2011
From: Ajiuni M
Southern Nuclear Operating Co
To:
Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NL-11-0865
Download: ML111220096 (10)
v • d • e


Text

Mark J. Ajluni, P.E. Southern Nuclear Nuclear Licensing Director Operating Company, Inc.

40 Inverness Center Post Office Box 1295 Birmingham, .Alabama 35201 Tel 205.992.7673 Fax 205.992.7885 SOUTHERN'\

COMPANY April 30, 2011 Docket Nos.: 50-321 50-348 50-424 NL-11-0865 50-366 50-364 50-425 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATIN: Document Control Desk Washington, D. C. 20555-0001 Edwin I. Hatch Nuclear Plant Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant Vogtle Electric Generating Plant Annual Non-Radiological Environmental Operating Reports for 2010 Ladies and Gentlemen:

In accordance with Subsection 5.4.1 of the referenced plants' Environmental Protection Plans (Appendix B to the Operating Licenses), Southern Nuclear Operating Company hereby submits the Annual Non-Radiological Environmental Operating Reports for 2010.

This letter contains no NRC commitments. If you have any questions. please contact Jack Stringfellow at (205) 992-7037.

Respectfully submitted,

~&~

M. J. Ajluni Nuclear Licensing Director MJAlLPH/lac

Enclosures:

1. Hatch Annual Non-Radiological Environmental Operating Report for 2010
2. Farley Annual Non-Radiological Environmental Operating Report for 2010
3. Vogtle Annual Non-Radiological Environmental Operating Report for 2010

U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission NL-11-0865 Page 2 cc: Southern Nuclear Operating Company Mr. J. T. Gasser, Executive Vice President Mr. L. M. Stinson, Vice President - Farley Mr. D. R. Madison, Vice President - Hatch Mr. T. E. Tynan, Vice President - Vogtle Ms. P. M. Marino, Vice President - Engineering RType: CFA04.054; CHA02.004; CVC7000 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mr. V.M. McCree, Regional Administrator Mr. R. Martin, NRR Project Manager - Farley, Hatch and Vogtle Mr. P. G. Boyle, NRR Project Manager Mr. E. L. Crowe, Senior Resident Inspector - Farley Mr. E. D. Morris, Senior Resident Inspector - Hatch Mr. M. Cain, Senior Resident Inspector - Vogtle

Edwin I. Hatch Nuclear Plant Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant Vogtle Electric Generating Plant Annual Non-Radiological Environmental Operating Reports for 2010 Enclosure 1 Hatch Annual Non-Radiological Environmental Operating Report for 2010

Altadm1ent 1 Page I of2 Annual Non-Radiological Environmental Operating Reports for 2010 EDWIN I. HATCH NUCLEAR PLANT - UNITS 1 AND 2 L Introduction This report is submitted in accordance with Subsection 5.4.1 of the Edwin L Hatch Nuclear Plant Environmental Protection Plan, Appendix B to Facility Operating Licenses DPR-57 and NPF-5. This report describes implementation orthe Environmental Protection Plan for the calendar year 2010.

n. Reporting Requirements A. Summaries aDd Analyses of Results of Environmental Protection Activities Requin'd by Subsection 4.2 of tbe Environmental Protection Plan (EPP) for the Reporting Period I. Aquatic Monitoring - Liquid effluent monitoring was performed in accordance with the State of Georgia National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Pem1!l GA0004120; there was no additional requirement for aquatic monitoring during the year.
2. Terrestrial Monitoring - Terrestrial monitoring is not required.
3. Maintenance of Transmission Line Corridors . . . There is no repOliing requirement associated with this condition.

B. Comparisons of tbe Year's Monitoring Activities with Preoperational Studies, Operational Controls, and Previous Nonrad;ological Environmental Monitoring Reports These comparisons were not required because no nonradiological environmental monitoring pro!:,'Tams were conducted during the reporting period beyond those performed ill accordance with NPDES Pem1it No.

GA0004120.

C. Assessment of the Observed Impacts of Plant Operation Oil the Envh'ollment There were no significant adverse environmental impacts associated with plant operation during the year.

D. EPI" Noncompliance and Corrective Actions

'rhere wcre no EPP noncompliances during the year.

Page 2 of2 Annual Non-Radiological Environmental Operating Reports tor 2010 E. Chan2es in Station Design or Operation. Tests, or Experiments Made in Accordance with EPP Subsection 3.1 Which Involved a Potentially Significant Unreviewed Environmental Question There were no changes in station design or operation. tests, or experiments which involved a potentially significant, unreviewed environmental question.

F. Nonroutine Reports Submitted in Accordance with EPP Section 5.4.2 There were no nonroutine repol1s submitted during the year.

Edwin I. Hatch Nuclear Plant Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant Vogtle Electric Generating Plant Annual Non-Radiological Environmental Operating Reports for 2010 Enclosure 2 Farley Annual Non-Radiological Environment Operating Report for 2010 Page I of 1 Annual Non-Radiological Environmental Operating Reports for 2010

.JOSEPH 1\'1. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT - UNITS 1 AND 2

1. Introduction Tn accordance with Subsection SA.I of the Joseph M. farley Nuclear Plant Environmental Protection Plan, Appendix B to Facility Operating License Nos. NPF-2 and KPF-8, I.his report is submitted summarizing implementation of the Enviromnental Protection Plan for calendar year 20 IO.

II. Reporting Reguirements A. Summaries and Analyses of Results of Environmental Protection Activities Required by Subsection 4.2 of the Environmental Protection Plan (EPP) for tbe Reporting Period I. Aerial Remote Sensing - Aerial Remote Sensing is no longer required.

2. Herbicide Application - There is no reporting requirement associated with this condition.
3. Land Management - There is no reporting requirement associated with this condition.

B. Comparison of the Year's Monitoring Activities wit.h Preoperational Studies, Operational Controls, and Previous Non-Radiological Monitoring Reports These comparisons were not required because no nonradiological environmenlal monitoring programs were conducted during the reporting period beyond those performed in accordance with NPDES Pennit No.

AL00246 I 9.

C. Assessment of the Observed Impacts of Plant Operation on the f:nvironment There were no significant adverse environmental impacts associated with plant operation during the year.

D. EPP :"/oncompliance and Corrective Actions There were no EPP lIoncompl lances during the year.

E. Changes in Station Design or Operation, Tests, or Experiments Made in Accordance with EPP Section 3.1 Wbich Involved a Potentially Significant Un reviewed Environmental Question There were no changes in shltion design or operation, tests. or experiments which involved a potentially significant, unreviewed enviromnemal question.

F. Nonroutine Reports Submitted in Accordance with EPP Section 5.4.2 There were no nonroutine reports submitted during the year.

Edwin I. Hatch Nuclear Plant Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant Vogtle Electric Generating Plant Annual Non-Radiological Environmental Operating Reports for 2010 Enclosure 3 Vogtle Annual Non-Radiological Environmental Operating Report for 2010

Attachment J Page 101'2 Annual Non-Radiological Environmental Operating Reports for 2010 VOGTLE ELECTRIC GI<~NERATING PLANT - UNITS 1 AND 2 I. Introduction In accordance with Subsection 5.4.1 of the VObrtle Electric Generating Plant (VEGP)

Environmental Protection Plan (Nollradiological). Appendix B to Facility Operating License Nos. NPF-68 and I\"l'F-8J, this report is submitted describing implementation \.)1' the Environmental Protection Plan for the calendar year 2010, II. Reporting Requirements A. Summaries and Analyses of Results of Environmental Protection Activities Required hy Subsection 4.2 of the Environmental Protection Plan (EPJ>> for the Reporting Period I. Aquatic Monitoring - Liquid effluent monitoring was performed in accordance with State of Genrgia National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Pennit GA0026786; there was no additional requirement for aquatic monitonng during the year,

2. 'rcrrestrial Monitoring - Terrestrial monitoring is not required.

J. Maintenallce oCTransmission I ,inc Corridors There is no reporting requirement associated with this condition.

4. Noise Monitoring There were no complaints reported regarding noise along the VEGP-related, high-voltage transmission lines, B. Comparison of the Year's Monitoring Activities with Preoperational Studies, Operational Controls, and Previous Monitoring Reports These programs were not required because no nonradiologicai environmental monitoring programs were conducted during the reporting period beyond those perfonned in accordance with NPDES Pennit No. GA0026786 referenced in Section A above.

C. Assessment of the Observed Impacts of Plant Operation 011 the Environmt'nt

'rhere were nt) si&'nificant adverse envirornnental impacts associated with plant operation during tile year.

D. EPP Noncompliance and Corrective Actions There were no EPP noncompliances during the year.

Page 2 of2 Annual Non-Radiological Envirorunental Operating Reports for 2010 E. Changes in Station Design or Operation, Tests, or Experiments Made in Accordance with EPP Subsection 3.1 Which Involved a Potentially Significant Unreviewcd Environmental QlIestion There were no changes in station design or operation, tests, or experiments which involved a potentially significant, unreviewed environmental question, including activities related to the proposed VagLle Units 3 cU1d 4.

" Nonroutine Reports Submitted in Accordance with EPP Section 5.4.2 I '.

There were no nonroutine reports submitted during the yeHr,

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=NL-11-0865,_Annual_Non-Radiological_Environmental_Operating_Reports_for_2010&oldid=2118385"