NL-10-0839, Submittal of Annual Non-Radiological Environmental Operating Report for 2009
| ML101190082 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Hatch, Vogtle, Farley  |
| Issue date: | 04/28/2010 |
| From: | Moorer T Southern Nuclear Operating Co |
| To: | Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| NL-10-0839 | |
| Download: ML101190082 (11) | |
Text
Southern Nucl!la~
Operati!1g Company, Inc April 28, 2010 SOUTHERNA COMPANY
!"ner'2J' to ~\\';erl'e }~J!iJ' H,"(lrld Docket Nos,: 50-321 50-348 50-424 NL-fo-0839 50-366 50-364 50-425 U, S, Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATIN: Document Control Desk Washington, D. C. 20555-0001 Edwin I. Hatch Nuclear Plant Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant Vogtle Electric Generating Plant Annual Non-Radiological Environmental Operating Report for 2009 Ladies and Gentlemen:
In accordance with Subsection 5.4.1 of the referenced plants' Environmental Protection Plans (Appendix B to the Operating Licenses), Southern Nuclear Operating Company hereby submits the Annual Non-Radiological Environmental Operating Reports for 2009.
This letter contains no NRC commitments. If you have any questions, please advise.
Sincerely,
/~z~~
T.C. Moorer Environmental Affairs, Chemistry, and Radiological Services Manager TCM/LWVV
Enclosures:
- 1. Hatch Annual Non-Radiological Environmental Operating Report for 2009
- 2. Farley Annual Non-Radiological Environmental Operating Report for 2009
- 3. Vogtle Annual Non-Radiological Environmental Operating Report for 2009
U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission NL-10-0839 Page 2 cc:
Southern Nuclear Operating Company Mr. J. 1. Gasser, Executive Vice President Mr. J. R. Johnson, Vice President - Farley Mr. D. R. Madison, Vice President - Hatch Mr. 1. E. Tynan, Vice President - Vogtle Ms. P. M. Marino, Vice President - Engineering RType: CFA04.054; CHA02.004; CVC7000 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mr. L. A. Reyes, Regional Administrator Mr. R. E. Martin, NRR Project Manager - Farley, Hatch, Vogtle Mr. P. G. Boyle, NRR Project Manager Mr. E. L. Crowe, Senior Resident Inspector - Farley Mr. E. D. Morris, Senior Resident Inspector - Hatch Mr. M. Cain, Senior Resident Inspector - Vogtle State of Alabama Mr. J. L. McNees, Department of Public Health, Division of Radiation Control State of Georgia Mr. C. Clark, Department of Natural Resources American Nuclear Insurers Mr. R. A. Oliveira
Edwin I. Hatch Nuclear Plant Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant Vogtle Electric Generating Plant Annual Non-Radiological Environmental Operating Report for 2009 Hatch Annual Non-Radiological Environmental Operating Report for 2009 Hatch Annual Non-Radiological Environmental Operating Report for 2009 EDWIN I. HATCH NUCLEAR PLANT - UNITS 1 AND 2 I.
Introduction This report is submitted in accordance with Subsection 5.4.1 of the Edwin I.
Hatch Nuclear Plant Environmental Protection Plan, Appendix B to Facility Operating Licenses DPR-57 and NPF-5. This report describes implementation of the Environmental Protection Plan for the calendar year 2009.
II.
Reporting Requirements A.
Summaries and Analyses of Results of Environmental Protection Activities Required by Subsection 4.2 of the Environmental Protection Plan (EPP) for the Reporting Period
- 1. Aquatic Monitoring - Liquid effluent monitoring was performed in accordance with the State of Georgia National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit GA0004120; there was no additional requirement for aquatic monitoring during the year.
- 2. Terrestrial Monitoring - Terrestrial monitoring is not required.
- 3. Maintenance of Transmission Line Corridors - There is no reporting requirement associated with this condition.
B.
Comparisons of the Year's Monitoring Activities with Preoperational Studies, Operational Controls, and Previous Nonradiological Environmental Monitoring Reports These comparisons were not required because no nonradiological environmental monitoring programs were conducted during the reporting period beyond those performed in accordance with NPDES Permit No.
GA0004120.
C.
Assessment of the Observed Impacts of Plant Operation on the Environment There were no significant adverse environmental impacts associated with plant operation during the year.
D.
EPP Noncompliance and Corrective Actions There were no EPP noncompliances during the year.
E.
Changes in Station Design or Operation, Tests, or Experiments Made in Accordance with EPP Subsection 3.1 Which Involved a Potentially Significant Unreviewed Environmental Question E1-1 Hatch Annual Non-Radiological Environmental Operating Report for 2009 There were no changes in station design or operation, tests, or experiments which involved a potentially significant, unreviewed environmental question.
F.
Nonroutine Reports Submitted in Accordance with EPP Section 5.4.2 There were no nonroutine reports submitted during the year.
E1-2
Edwin I. Hatch Nuclear Plant Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant Vogtle Electric Generating Plant Annual Non-Radiological Environmental Operating Report for 2009 Farley Annual Non-Radiological Environmental Operating Report for 2009 Farley Annual Non-Radiological Environmental Operating Report for 2009 JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT - UNITS 1 AND 2 I.
Introduction In accordance with Subsection 5.4.1 of the Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant Environmental Protection Plan, Appendix B to Facility Operating License Nos.
NPF-2 and NPF-8, this report is submitted summarizing implementation of the Environmental Protection Plan for calendar year 2009.
II.
Reporting Requirements A.
Summaries and Analyses of Results of Environmental Protection Activities Required by Subsection 4.2 of the Environmental Protection Plan (EPP) for the Reporting Period
- 1. Aerial Remote Sensing - Aerial Remote Sensing is no longer required.
- 2. Herbicide Application - There is no reporting requirement associated with this condition.
- 3. Land Management - There is no reporting requirement associated with this condition.
B.
Comparison of the Year's Monitoring Activities with Preoperational Studies, Operational Controls, and Previous Non-Radiological Monitoring Reports These comparisons were not required because no nonradiological environmental monitoring programs were conducted during the reporting period beyond those performed in accordance with NPDES Permit No.
AL0024619.
C.
Assessment of the Observed Impacts of Plant Operation on the Environment There were no significant adverse environmental impacts associated with plant operation during the year.
D.
EPP Noncompliance and Corrective Actions There were no EPP noncompliances during the year.
E.
Changes in Station Design or Operation, Tests, or Experiments Made in Accordance with EPP Section 3.1 Which Involved a Potentially Significant Unreviewed Environmental Question There were no changes in station design or operation, tests, or experiments which involved a potentially significant, unreviewed environmental question.
E2-1 Farley Annual Non-Radiological Environmental Operating Report for 2009 F.
Nonroutine Reports Submitted in Accordance with EPP Section 5.4.2 There were no nonroutine reports submitted during the year.
E2-2
Edwin I. Hatch Nuclear Plant Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant Vogtle Electric Generating Plant Annual Non-Radiological Environmental Operating Report for 2009 Vogtle Annual Non-Radiological Environmental Operating Report for 2009 Vogtle Annual Non-Radiological Environmental Operating Report for 2009 VOGTLE ELECTRIC GENERATING PLANT - UNITS 1 AND 2 I.
Introduction In accordance with Subsection 5.4.1 of the Vogtle Electric Generating Plant (VEGP) Environmental Protection Plan (Nonradiological), Appendix B to Facility Operating License Nos. NPF-68 and NPF-81, this report is submitted describing implementation of the Environmental Protection Plan for the calendar year 2009.
II.
Reporting Requirements A.
Summaries and Analyses of Results of Environmental Protection Activities Required by Subsection 4.2 of the Environmental Protection Plan (EPP) for the Reporting Period
- 1. Aquatic Monitoring - Liquid effluent monitoring was performed in accordance with State of Georgia National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit GA0026786; there was no additional requirement for aquatic monitoring during the year.
- 2. Terrestrial Monitoring - Terrestrial monitoring is not required.
- 3. Maintenance of Transmission Line Corridors - There is no reporting requirement associated with this condition.
- 4. Noise Monitoring - There were no complaints reported regarding noise along the VEGP-related, high-voltage transmission lines.
B.
Comparison of the Year's Monitoring Activities with Preoperational Studies, Operational Controls, and Previous Monitoring Reports These programs were not required because no nonradiological environmental monitoring programs were conducted during the reporting period beyond those performed in accordance with NPDES Permit No. GA0026786 referenced in Section A above.
C.
Assessment of the Observed Impacts of Plant Operation on the Environment There were no significant adverse environmental impacts associated with plant operation during the year.
D.
EPP Noncompliance and Corrective Actions There were no EPP noncompliances during the year.
E3-1 Vogtle Annual Non-Radiological Environmental Operating Report for 2009 E.
Changes in Station Design or Operation, Tests, or Experiments Made in Accordance with EPP Subsection 3.1 Which Involved a Potentially Significant Unreviewed Environmental Question There were no changes in station design or operation, tests, or experiments which involved a potentially significant, unreviewed environmental question, including activities related to the proposed Vogtle Units 3 and 4.
F.
Nonroutine Reports Submitted in Accordance with EPP Section 5.4.2 There were no nonroutine reports submitted during the year.
E3-2