ML12159A154: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| issue date = 06/22/2012 | | issue date = 06/22/2012 | ||
| title = Summary of Site Audit Related to the Review of the License Renewal Application for Callaway Plant, Unit 1 (TAC Nos. ME7715 and ME7716) | | title = Summary of Site Audit Related to the Review of the License Renewal Application for Callaway Plant, Unit 1 (TAC Nos. ME7715 and ME7716) | ||
| author name = Fells C | | author name = Fells C | ||
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DLR/RPB2 | | author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DLR/RPB2 | ||
| addressee name = | | addressee name = | ||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
| docket = 05000483 | | docket = 05000483 | ||
| license number = | | license number = | ||
| contact person = Fells C | | contact person = Fells C, 415-6337 | ||
| case reference number = TAC ME7715, TAC ME7716 | | case reference number = TAC ME7715, TAC ME7716 | ||
| document type = Letter, Audit Report | | document type = Letter, Audit Report | ||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:,-"",,,, | {{#Wiki_filter:,-"",,,, ReGu~ UNITED STATES | ||
UNITED STATES "'01' NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION | ~~" "'01' NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION | ||
!! WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 | !! | ||
<< | |||
Ameren Callaway Plant, Unit 1 | ~ | ||
0 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 | |||
\;; | |||
% | |||
": i June 22,2012 | |||
"'" ...0 | |||
****-1< | |||
LICENSEE: Ameren FACILITY: Callaway Plant, Unit 1 | |||
==SUBJECT:== | |||
==SUMMARY== | ==SUMMARY== | ||
OF SITE AUDIT RELATED TO THE REVIEW OF THE LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION FOR CALLAWAY PLANT, UNIT 1 (TAC NOS. ME7715 AND ME7716) From May 22 -24,2012, a review team consisting of staff from the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or the staff) and contractors from Ecology and Environment, Inc. (E&E) and Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) participated in a site audit at Callaway Plant, Unit 1 (Callaway), related to the environmental review of the Callaway license renewal application. | OF SITE AUDIT RELATED TO THE REVIEW OF THE LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION FOR CALLAWAY PLANT, UNIT 1 (TAC NOS. | ||
The primary goal of the site visit was to review documentation, gather information to ensure that the environmental requirements of license renewal as codified in Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations Part 51 (10 CFR Part 51) were met, and to interface with officials in Federal, State, and local government agencies to obtain related information. | ME7715 AND ME7716) | ||
Enclosed is a list of representatives from NRC, E&E, PNNL, Missouri Department of Natural Resources, Missouri Department of Conservation, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Ameren, and those invited by Ameren -all of whom participated in the site audit. The environmental audit began on May 22, 2012, with a kickoff meeting to introduce participants and to discuss logistics of the audit. Following the kickoff meeting, the environmental review team participated in a general site tour of Callaway with Ameren staff. The general site tour provided an ecological overview of the site and focused on areas relevant to the environmental review. Severe Accident Mitigation Alternatives (SAMA) were also included as a part of the audit. NRC staff members met with Ameren representatives to discuss various matters including levels 1, 2, and 3 probablistic risk assessment (PRA) models and also SAMA identification and evaluation. | From May 22 - 24,2012, a review team consisting of staff from the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or the staff) and contractors from Ecology and Environment, Inc. (E&E) and Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) participated in a site audit at Callaway Plant, Unit 1 (Callaway), related to the environmental review of the Callaway license renewal application. The primary goal of the site visit was to review documentation, gather information to ensure that the environmental requirements of license renewal as codified in Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations Part 51 (10 CFR Part 51) were met, and to interface with officials in Federal, State, and local government agencies to obtain related information. Enclosed is a list of representatives from NRC, E&E, PNNL, Missouri Department of Natural Resources, Missouri Department of Conservation, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Ameren, and those invited by Ameren - all of whom participated in the site audit. | ||
The environmental audit began on May 22, 2012, with a kickoff meeting to introduce participants and to discuss logistics of the audit. Following the kickoff meeting, the environmental review team participated in a general site tour of Callaway with Ameren staff. The general site tour provided an ecological overview of the site and focused on areas relevant to the environmental review. | |||
Severe Accident Mitigation Alternatives (SAMA) were also included as a part of the audit. NRC staff members met with Ameren representatives to discuss various matters including levels 1, 2, and 3 probablistic risk assessment (PRA) models and also SAMA identification and evaluation. | |||
At the conclusion of the SAMA audit, NRC staff summarized the status of the review with Ameren representatives. | At the conclusion of the SAMA audit, NRC staff summarized the status of the review with Ameren representatives. | ||
During the environmental site audit, the review team examined data used by Ameren in preparation of the Environmental Report and met in smaller groups with Ameren representatives with corresponding environmental expertise. | During the environmental site audit, the review team examined data used by Ameren in preparation of the Environmental Report and met in smaller groups with Ameren representatives with corresponding environmental expertise. These groups participated in various activities, including tours of radiological environmental monitioring program stations, the intake structure, wetland communities surrounding the plant, the Reform Conservation Area, archaeological sites, onsite National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System-permitted outfalls, in-scope transmission line rights-of-way, radioactive waste processing and storage areas, and meteorological towers and monitoring equipment. | ||
These groups participated in various activities, including tours of radiological environmental monitioring program stations, the intake structure, wetland communities surrounding the plant, the Reform Conservation Area, archaeological sites, onsite National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System-permitted outfalls, in-scope transmission line rights-of-way, radioactive waste processing and storage areas, and meteorological towers and monitoring equipment. | |||
-The environmental review team also met onsite with officials from the Missouri Department of Natural Resources, the Missouri Department of Conservation and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Information gathered through participation of these agencies will assist the environmental review team in its evaluation. | - 2 The environmental review team also met onsite with officials from the Missouri Department of Natural Resources, the Missouri Department of Conservation and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Information gathered through participation of these agencies will assist the environmental review team in its evaluation. | ||
In addition, the team reviewed Ameren's process for identifying new and significant information (information that would challenge the generic conclusions reached in the Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants, NUREG-1437). | In addition, the team reviewed Ameren's process for identifying new and significant information (information that would challenge the generic conclusions reached in the Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants, NUREG-1437). Ameren cited no new and significant information, and the team's independent review during the course of the site audit did not identify any either. | ||
Ameren cited no new and significant information, and the team's independent review during the course of the site audit did not identify any either. Prior to the audit, the environmental team provided Ameren with a plan including questions, document requests, and suggested tour logistics in an effort to further facilitate the review (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) accession number | Prior to the audit, the environmental team provided Ameren with a plan including questions, document requests, and suggested tour logistics in an effort to further facilitate the review (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) accession number ML12131A477). This document is publically available in ADAMS at http://www.nrc.gov/reading rm/adams.html. Persons who do not have access to ADAMS or who encounter problems in accessing the documents located in ADAMS should contact the NRC's Public Document Room staff at 800-397-4209 (or 301-415-4737) or bye-mall at pdr.resource@nrc.gov. | ||
This document is publically available in ADAMS at rm/adams.html. | At the conclusion of the site audit, the environmental review team summarized the results of the audit with Ameren representatives. For environmental and SAMA questions that were not answered during the audit or required a docketed response, the staff will consider issuing requests for additional information (RAls). | ||
Persons who do not have access to ADAMS or who encounter problems in accessing the documents located in ADAMS should contact the NRC's Public Document Room staff at 800-397-4209 (or 301-415-4737) or bye-mall at pdr.resource@nrc.gov. | While the NRC review team did not identify any significant issues during its site audit or during the meetings with other participants, the team indicated that the environmental review was ongoing and that any additional information necessary to support the review would be formally requested. | ||
At the conclusion of the site audit, the environmental review team summarized the results of the audit with Ameren representatives. | Carmen Fells, Project Manager Projects Branch 2 Division of License Renewal Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-483 | ||
For environmental and SAMA questions that were not answered during the audit or required a docketed response, the staff will consider issuing requests for additional information (RAls). While the NRC review team did not identify any significant issues during its site audit or during the meetings with other participants, the team indicated that the environmental review was ongoing and that any additional information necessary to support the review would be formally requested. | |||
Carmen Fells, Project Manager Projects Branch 2 Division of License Renewal Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-483 | |||
==Enclosure:== | ==Enclosure:== | ||
As stated cc w/encl: Listserv LIST OF CALLAWAY PLANT, UNIT LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION ENVIRONMENTAL SITE May 22-24, 2012 PARTICIPANT AFFILIATION Briana Balsam U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Carmen Fells NRC William Ford NRC Emily Larson NRC Dennis Logan NRC John Parillo NRC Jeremy Susco NRC Garill Coles Pacific Northwest National Laboratory John Mauro Ecology and Environment, Inc. (E&E) Gregory Hofer E&E Jacquelyn Gillings E&E Sean Meegan E&E Bruce Wattle E&E David Back E&E Donna Kassel E&E Greg Netti E&E Natasha Snyder E&E Jane Beetem Missouri Department of Natural Resources Judith Deel Missouri Department of Natural Resources Patrick Anderson Missouri Department of Natural Resources Peter Price Missouri Department of Natural Resources Jennifer Campbell-Allison Missouri Department of Conservation Rick Hansen U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Sarah Kovaleski Ameren Missouri Chris Graham Ameren Missouri Andrew Burgess Ameren Missouri Kenny Lynn Ameren Missouri Greg Kremer Ameren Missouri Gail Gary Ameren Missouri Brian Holderness Ameren Missouri Sharaon Merciel Ameren Missouri Courtney Johnson Ameren Missouri Trent Russel Ameren Missouri David Shafer Ameren Missouri Luke Graessle Ameren Missouri Les Kanuckel Ameren Missouri Greg Kraemer Ameren Missouri Bob Turner Ameren Missouri Randy Kempf Ameren Missouri Johnny Houston Ameren Missouri David Maschler Joe Montgomery Kip Barbour David Walker Jason Kolons | As stated cc w/encl: Listserv | ||
SCE SCE Tennessee Valley Authority Tetra Tech Tetra Tech Tetra Tech Entergy Nuclear Erin Engineering | |||
-The environmental review team also met onsite with officials from the Missouri Department of Natural Resources, the Missouri Department of Conservation and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Information gathered through participation of these agencies will assist the environmental review team in its evaluation. | LIST OF PARTICIPANTS CALLAWAY PLANT, UNIT 1 LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION REVIEW ENVIRONMENTAL SITE AUDIT May 22-24, 2012 PARTICIPANT AFFILIATION Briana Balsam U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) | ||
In addition, the team reviewed Ameren's process for identifying new and significant information (information that would challenge the generic conclusions reached in the Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants, NUREG-1437). | Carmen Fells NRC William Ford NRC Emily Larson NRC Dennis Logan NRC John Parillo NRC Jeremy Susco NRC Garill Coles Pacific Northwest National Laboratory John Mauro Ecology and Environment, Inc. (E&E) | ||
Ameren cited no new and significant information, and the team's independent review during the course of the site audit did not identify any either. Prior to the audit, the environmental team provided Ameren with a plan including questions, document requests, and suggested tour logistics in an effort to further facilitate the review (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) accession number | Gregory Hofer E&E Jacquelyn Gillings E&E Sean Meegan E&E Bruce Wattle E&E David Back E&E Donna Kassel E&E Greg Netti E&E Natasha Snyder E&E Jane Beetem Missouri Department of Natural Resources Judith Deel Missouri Department of Natural Resources Patrick Anderson Missouri Department of Natural Resources Peter Price Missouri Department of Natural Resources Jennifer Campbell-Allison Missouri Department of Conservation Rick Hansen U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Sarah Kovaleski Ameren Missouri Chris Graham Ameren Missouri Andrew Burgess Ameren Missouri Kenny Lynn Ameren Missouri Greg Kremer Ameren Missouri Gail Gary Ameren Missouri Brian Holderness Ameren Missouri Sharaon Merciel Ameren Missouri Courtney Johnson Ameren Missouri Trent Russel Ameren Missouri David Shafer Ameren Missouri Luke Graessle Ameren Missouri Les Kanuckel Ameren Missouri Greg Kraemer Ameren Missouri Bob Turner Ameren Missouri Randy Kempf Ameren Missouri Johnny Houston Ameren Missouri ENCLOSURE | ||
Persons who do not have access to ADAMS or who encounter problems in accessing the documents located in ADAMS should contact the NRC's Public Document Room staff at 800-397-4209 (or 301-415-4737) or bye-mail at pdr.resource@nrc.gov. | |||
At the conclusion of the site audit, the environmental review team summarized the results of the audit with Ameren representatives. | -2 David Maschler Ameren Missouri Joe Montgomery Ameren Missouri Kip Barbour Ameren Missouri David Walker Ameren Missouri Jason Kolons Southern California Edison (SCE) | ||
For environmental and SAMA questions that were not answered during the audit or required a docketed response, the staff will consider issuing requests for additional information (RAls). While the NRC review team did not identify any significant issues during its site audit or during the meetings with other participants, the team indicated that the environmental review was ongoing and that any additional information necessary to support the review would be formally requested. | Brian Metz SCE Kathleen Yhip SCE Chuck Wilson Tennessee Valley Authority Steve Connor Tetra Tech Krista Dearing Tetra Tech Philip Moore Tetra Tech Rick Buckley Entergy Nuclear Don MacCleod Erin Engineering | ||
IRA! Carmen Fells, Project Manager Projects Branch 2 Division of License Renewal Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-483 | |||
- 2 The environmental review team also met onsite with officials from the Missouri Department of Natural Resources, the Missouri Department of Conservation and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Information gathered through participation of these agencies will assist the environmental review team in its evaluation. | |||
In addition, the team reviewed Ameren's process for identifying new and significant information (information that would challenge the generic conclusions reached in the Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants, NUREG-1437). Ameren cited no new and significant information, and the team's independent review during the course of the site audit did not identify any either. | |||
Prior to the audit, the environmental team provided Ameren with a plan including questions, document requests, and suggested tour logistics in an effort to further facilitate the review (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) accession number ML12131A477). This document is publically available in ADAMS at http://www.nrc.gov/reading rm/adams.html. Persons who do not have access to ADAMS or who encounter problems in accessing the documents located in ADAMS should contact the NRC's Public Document Room staff at 800-397-4209 (or 301-415-4737) or bye-mail at pdr.resource@nrc.gov. | |||
At the conclusion of the site audit, the environmental review team summarized the results of the audit with Ameren representatives. For environmental and SAMA questions that were not answered during the audit or required a docketed response, the staff will consider issuing requests for additional information (RAls). | |||
While the NRC review team did not identify any significant issues during its site audit or during the meetings with other participants, the team indicated that the environmental review was ongoing and that any additional information necessary to support the review would be formally requested. | |||
IRA! | |||
Carmen Fells, Project Manager Projects Branch 2 Division of License Renewal Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-483 | |||
==Enclosures:== | ==Enclosures:== | ||
As stated cc w/encls: Listserv DISTRIBUTION: | As stated cc w/encls: Listserv DISTRIBUTION: See next page ADAMS A ccesslon . N0.: ML12159A154 *C oncurre d via . emal'1 on Memo & Ene 1 only OFFICE LA:DLR PM:RPB2:DLR BC:RPB2:DLR PM:RPB2:DLR NAME IKing* CFelis DWrona CFelis DATE 06/8/12 06/14/12 ~22/12 06/22/12 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY | ||
See next page | |||
*C | Memorandum from C. Fells to Callaway Plant, Unit 1 dated June 22, 2012 | ||
==SUBJECT:== | ==SUBJECT:== | ||
==SUMMARY== | ==SUMMARY== | ||
OF SITE AUDIT RELATED TO THE REVIEW OF THE LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION FOR CALLAWAY, UNIT 1 (TAC NO. ME7715 AND ME7716) DISTRIBUTION: | OF SITE AUDIT RELATED TO THE REVIEW OF THE LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION FOR CALLAWAY, UNIT 1 (TAC NO. ME7715 AND ME7716) | ||
DISTRIBUTION: | |||
HARDCOPY: | HARDCOPY: | ||
DLR Reading File E-MAIL: PUBLIC RidsNrrDlr Resource RidsNrrDlrRpb2 Resource RidsNrrDlrRpb1 Resource RidsNrrDlrRarb Resource RidsNrrDlrRapb Resource RidsNrrDlrRasb Resource RidsNrrDlrRerb Resource RidsNrrDlrRpob Resource RidsNrrDraApla Resource DWrona JSusco AHon, DORL DMclntyre,OPA MSpencer, OGC AGhosh,OGC BMaier, RIV NOKeefe, RIV THartman, RIV ZHolicraft, RIV VDricks, RIV LUselding, RIV}} | DLR Reading File E-MAIL: | ||
PUBLIC RidsNrrDlr Resource RidsNrrDlrRpb2 Resource RidsNrrDlrRpb1 Resource RidsNrrDlrRarb Resource RidsNrrDlrRapb Resource RidsNrrDlrRasb Resource RidsNrrDlrRerb Resource RidsNrrDlrRpob Resource RidsNrrDraApla Resource DWrona JSusco AHon, DORL DMclntyre,OPA MSpencer, OGC AGhosh,OGC BMaier, RIV NOKeefe, RIV THartman, RIV ZHolicraft, RIV VDricks, RIV LUselding, RIV}} |
Latest revision as of 03:40, 12 November 2019
ML12159A154 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Callaway |
Issue date: | 06/22/2012 |
From: | Fells C License Renewal Projects Branch 2 |
To: | AmerenUE |
Fells C, 415-6337 | |
References | |
TAC ME7715, TAC ME7716 | |
Download: ML12159A154 (6) | |
Text
,-"",,,, ReGu~ UNITED STATES
~~" "'01' NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
!!
<<
~
0 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001
\;;
%
": i June 22,2012
"'" ...0
- -1<
LICENSEE: Ameren FACILITY: Callaway Plant, Unit 1
SUBJECT:
SUMMARY
OF SITE AUDIT RELATED TO THE REVIEW OF THE LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION FOR CALLAWAY PLANT, UNIT 1 (TAC NOS.
ME7715 AND ME7716)
From May 22 - 24,2012, a review team consisting of staff from the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or the staff) and contractors from Ecology and Environment, Inc. (E&E) and Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) participated in a site audit at Callaway Plant, Unit 1 (Callaway), related to the environmental review of the Callaway license renewal application. The primary goal of the site visit was to review documentation, gather information to ensure that the environmental requirements of license renewal as codified in Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations Part 51 (10 CFR Part 51) were met, and to interface with officials in Federal, State, and local government agencies to obtain related information. Enclosed is a list of representatives from NRC, E&E, PNNL, Missouri Department of Natural Resources, Missouri Department of Conservation, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Ameren, and those invited by Ameren - all of whom participated in the site audit.
The environmental audit began on May 22, 2012, with a kickoff meeting to introduce participants and to discuss logistics of the audit. Following the kickoff meeting, the environmental review team participated in a general site tour of Callaway with Ameren staff. The general site tour provided an ecological overview of the site and focused on areas relevant to the environmental review.
Severe Accident Mitigation Alternatives (SAMA) were also included as a part of the audit. NRC staff members met with Ameren representatives to discuss various matters including levels 1, 2, and 3 probablistic risk assessment (PRA) models and also SAMA identification and evaluation.
At the conclusion of the SAMA audit, NRC staff summarized the status of the review with Ameren representatives.
During the environmental site audit, the review team examined data used by Ameren in preparation of the Environmental Report and met in smaller groups with Ameren representatives with corresponding environmental expertise. These groups participated in various activities, including tours of radiological environmental monitioring program stations, the intake structure, wetland communities surrounding the plant, the Reform Conservation Area, archaeological sites, onsite National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System-permitted outfalls, in-scope transmission line rights-of-way, radioactive waste processing and storage areas, and meteorological towers and monitoring equipment.
- 2 The environmental review team also met onsite with officials from the Missouri Department of Natural Resources, the Missouri Department of Conservation and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Information gathered through participation of these agencies will assist the environmental review team in its evaluation.
In addition, the team reviewed Ameren's process for identifying new and significant information (information that would challenge the generic conclusions reached in the Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants, NUREG-1437). Ameren cited no new and significant information, and the team's independent review during the course of the site audit did not identify any either.
Prior to the audit, the environmental team provided Ameren with a plan including questions, document requests, and suggested tour logistics in an effort to further facilitate the review (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) accession number ML12131A477). This document is publically available in ADAMS at http://www.nrc.gov/reading rm/adams.html. Persons who do not have access to ADAMS or who encounter problems in accessing the documents located in ADAMS should contact the NRC's Public Document Room staff at 800-397-4209 (or 301-415-4737) or bye-mall at pdr.resource@nrc.gov.
At the conclusion of the site audit, the environmental review team summarized the results of the audit with Ameren representatives. For environmental and SAMA questions that were not answered during the audit or required a docketed response, the staff will consider issuing requests for additional information (RAls).
While the NRC review team did not identify any significant issues during its site audit or during the meetings with other participants, the team indicated that the environmental review was ongoing and that any additional information necessary to support the review would be formally requested.
Carmen Fells, Project Manager Projects Branch 2 Division of License Renewal Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-483
Enclosure:
As stated cc w/encl: Listserv
LIST OF PARTICIPANTS CALLAWAY PLANT, UNIT 1 LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION REVIEW ENVIRONMENTAL SITE AUDIT May 22-24, 2012 PARTICIPANT AFFILIATION Briana Balsam U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)
Carmen Fells NRC William Ford NRC Emily Larson NRC Dennis Logan NRC John Parillo NRC Jeremy Susco NRC Garill Coles Pacific Northwest National Laboratory John Mauro Ecology and Environment, Inc. (E&E)
Gregory Hofer E&E Jacquelyn Gillings E&E Sean Meegan E&E Bruce Wattle E&E David Back E&E Donna Kassel E&E Greg Netti E&E Natasha Snyder E&E Jane Beetem Missouri Department of Natural Resources Judith Deel Missouri Department of Natural Resources Patrick Anderson Missouri Department of Natural Resources Peter Price Missouri Department of Natural Resources Jennifer Campbell-Allison Missouri Department of Conservation Rick Hansen U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Sarah Kovaleski Ameren Missouri Chris Graham Ameren Missouri Andrew Burgess Ameren Missouri Kenny Lynn Ameren Missouri Greg Kremer Ameren Missouri Gail Gary Ameren Missouri Brian Holderness Ameren Missouri Sharaon Merciel Ameren Missouri Courtney Johnson Ameren Missouri Trent Russel Ameren Missouri David Shafer Ameren Missouri Luke Graessle Ameren Missouri Les Kanuckel Ameren Missouri Greg Kraemer Ameren Missouri Bob Turner Ameren Missouri Randy Kempf Ameren Missouri Johnny Houston Ameren Missouri ENCLOSURE
-2 David Maschler Ameren Missouri Joe Montgomery Ameren Missouri Kip Barbour Ameren Missouri David Walker Ameren Missouri Jason Kolons Southern California Edison (SCE)
Brian Metz SCE Kathleen Yhip SCE Chuck Wilson Tennessee Valley Authority Steve Connor Tetra Tech Krista Dearing Tetra Tech Philip Moore Tetra Tech Rick Buckley Entergy Nuclear Don MacCleod Erin Engineering
- 2 The environmental review team also met onsite with officials from the Missouri Department of Natural Resources, the Missouri Department of Conservation and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Information gathered through participation of these agencies will assist the environmental review team in its evaluation.
In addition, the team reviewed Ameren's process for identifying new and significant information (information that would challenge the generic conclusions reached in the Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants, NUREG-1437). Ameren cited no new and significant information, and the team's independent review during the course of the site audit did not identify any either.
Prior to the audit, the environmental team provided Ameren with a plan including questions, document requests, and suggested tour logistics in an effort to further facilitate the review (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) accession number ML12131A477). This document is publically available in ADAMS at http://www.nrc.gov/reading rm/adams.html. Persons who do not have access to ADAMS or who encounter problems in accessing the documents located in ADAMS should contact the NRC's Public Document Room staff at 800-397-4209 (or 301-415-4737) or bye-mail at pdr.resource@nrc.gov.
At the conclusion of the site audit, the environmental review team summarized the results of the audit with Ameren representatives. For environmental and SAMA questions that were not answered during the audit or required a docketed response, the staff will consider issuing requests for additional information (RAls).
While the NRC review team did not identify any significant issues during its site audit or during the meetings with other participants, the team indicated that the environmental review was ongoing and that any additional information necessary to support the review would be formally requested.
IRA!
Carmen Fells, Project Manager Projects Branch 2 Division of License Renewal Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-483
Enclosures:
As stated cc w/encls: Listserv DISTRIBUTION: See next page ADAMS A ccesslon . N0.: ML12159A154 *C oncurre d via . emal'1 on Memo & Ene 1 only OFFICE LA:DLR PM:RPB2:DLR BC:RPB2:DLR PM:RPB2:DLR NAME IKing* CFelis DWrona CFelis DATE 06/8/12 06/14/12 ~22/12 06/22/12 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY
Memorandum from C. Fells to Callaway Plant, Unit 1 dated June 22, 2012
SUBJECT:
SUMMARY
OF SITE AUDIT RELATED TO THE REVIEW OF THE LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION FOR CALLAWAY, UNIT 1 (TAC NO. ME7715 AND ME7716)
DISTRIBUTION:
HARDCOPY:
DLR Reading File E-MAIL:
PUBLIC RidsNrrDlr Resource RidsNrrDlrRpb2 Resource RidsNrrDlrRpb1 Resource RidsNrrDlrRarb Resource RidsNrrDlrRapb Resource RidsNrrDlrRasb Resource RidsNrrDlrRerb Resource RidsNrrDlrRpob Resource RidsNrrDraApla Resource DWrona JSusco AHon, DORL DMclntyre,OPA MSpencer, OGC AGhosh,OGC BMaier, RIV NOKeefe, RIV THartman, RIV ZHolicraft, RIV VDricks, RIV LUselding, RIV