IR 05000326/2014201

IR 05000326/2014-201 on June 9-12, 2014 at University of California Irvine - NRC Routine Inspection Report No. 50-326/2014-201

ML14188B875
Person / Time
Site:	University of California - Irvine
Issue date:	07/10/2014
From:	Johnny Eads, Isaac P NRC/NRR/DPR/PRAB
To:	Gillman H University of California - Irvine
Eads J, DPR/PROB/919-219-9128
References
IR-14-201
Download: ML14188B875 (16)

Text

uly 10, 2014

SUBJECT:

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA - IRVINE, NRC ROUTINE INSPECTION REPORT NO. 50-326/2014-201

Dear Dr. Gillman:

On June 9-12, 2014, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC, the Commission)

conducted an inspection at the University of California - Irvine Nuclear Reactor Facility (Inspection Report No. 50-326/2014-201). The inspection included a review of activities authorized for your facility. The enclosed report presents the results of that inspection. Areas examined during the inspection are identified in the enclosed report. Within these areas, the inspection consisted of selective examinations of procedures and representative records, interviews with personnel, and observations of activities in progress.

Based on the results of this inspection, no safety concern or noncompliance of requirements was identified. No response to this letter is required.

In accordance with Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations Section 2.390 Public inspections, exemptions, and requests for withholding a copy of this letter and its enclosure will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records component of NRCs document system (Agencywide Document Access and Management System (ADAMS)). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at (the Public Electronic Reading Room) http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html.

Should you have any questions concerning this inspection, please contact Johnny Eads at 919-219-9128 or electronic mail at Johnny.Eads@nrc.gov.

Sincerely,

/RA/

Patrick J. Isaac, Acting Chief Research and Test Reactors Oversight Branch Division of Policy and Rulemaking Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-326 License No. R-116 Enclosure:

NRC Inspection Report No. 50-326/2014-201 cc: w/encl: See next page

University of California - Irvine Docket No. 50-326 cc:

Dr. Reginald M. Penner, Chair Department of Chemistry University of California, Irvine Irvine, CA 92697-2025 Dr. George E. Miller Department of Chemistry University of California, Irvine Irvine, CA 92697-2025 Test, Research and Training Reactor Newsletter 202 Nuclear Sciences Center University of Florida Gainesville, FL 32611

ML14188B875 *concurred via e-mail NRC-002 OFFICE NRR/DPR/PROB* NRR/DPR/PROB NAME JEads PIsaac DATE 7/7/14 7/10/14

U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION Docket No: 50-326 License No: R-116 Report No: 50-326/2014-201 Licensee: The Regents of the University of California Facility: University of California - Irvine Nuclear Reactor Facility Location: Department of Chemistry University of California, Irvine Irvine, CA Dates: June 9-12, 2014 Inspector: Johnny Eads Approved by: Patrick J. Isaac, Acting Chief Research and Test Reactors Oversight Branch Division of Policy and Rulemaking Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY University of California - Irvine Nuclear Reactor Facility NRC Inspection Report No. 50-326/2014-201 The primary focus of this routine, announced inspection was the onsite review of selected aspects of the University of California - Irvine Class II research reactor facility safety programs including: procedures; experiments; radiation protection program; effluent and environmental monitoring; design changes; committees, audits and reviews; and transportation. The licensees programs were acceptably directed toward the protection of public health and safety, and in compliance with NRC requirements.

Procedures

• Facility procedural review, revision, and implementation satisfied Technical Specification requirements.

Experiments

• Experiments were being reviewed and performed in accordance with Technical Specification requirements and the licensees written procedures.

Radiation Protection Program

• Surveys were being completed and documented acceptably to permit evaluation of the radiation hazards present.

• Postings and Notices met the regulatory requirements specified in 10 CFR Parts 19 and 20.

• Personnel dosimetry was being worn as required, and doses were well within the licensees procedural action levels and NRCs regulatory limits.

• The Radiation Protection Program being implemented by the licensee satisfied regulatory requirements.

Effluent and Environmental Monitoring

• Effluent monitoring satisfied license and regulatory requirements and airborne releases were within the specified regulatory and Technical Specification limits.

Design Changes

• The changes were reviewed and approved by the Reactor Operations Committee as required.

-2-Committees, Audits and Reviews Functions

• The Reactor Operations Committee provided the oversight required by the Technical Specifications.

• Annual audits of facility programs were being completed as required.

Transportation

• The licensees program for transportation of radioactive material including preparing packages for shipment and completing shipping papers was acceptable.

REPORT DETAILS Summary of Facility Status The University of California - Irvine (UCI) Nuclear Reactor Facility (NRF) 250 kilowatt TRIGA Mark-I research reactor continued to be operated in support of graduate and undergraduate research and laboratory instruction. During the inspection, the reactor did not operate due to ongoing maintenance.

1. Procedures a. Inspection Scope (IP 69001)

The inspector reviewed selected aspects of the following to verify that the licensee was complying with the requirements of Technical Specifications (TS) Sections 6.2, 6.3, and 6.7:

Records of procedure changes Observation of procedure implementation Administrative controls as outlined in UCI NRF Standard Operating Procedure (SOP)

No. 1, Introduction, Rev 3.2, approval dated January 2010 UCI NRF SOP No. 5, Radiological Safety Program, Rev 3.2, approval dated December 2009 Technical Specifications (TS) for the UC Irvine TRIGA Mark I Nuclear Reactor, Revised 1998 b. Observations and Findings The inspector reviewed the licensees written procedures and revisions to procedures.

The SOP manual was organized to address the full scope of activities conducted at the UCI NRF. The inspector noted that procedural changes were being reviewed and approved by the Reactor Operations Committee (ROC) as required by TS. Training of personnel on procedures and changes was acceptable. Through observation of various activities at the facility, including reactor operation, the inspector determined that licensee personnel conducted activities in accordance with applicable procedures.

Review of ROC meeting minutes and discussions with the licensee indicated the request and approval of procedure changes for operating procedures were documented.

c. Conclusions The inspector determined that the procedural review, revision and implementation satisfied TS requirements.

-2-2. Experiments a. Inspection Scope (IP 69001)

The inspector reviewed the following to verify compliance with TS 3.8, Limitations on Experiments:

• TS for the UC Irvine TRIGA Mark I Nuclear Reactor, Revised 1998

• UCI NRF SOP Section 2, Experiments, Rev. 3, Approved 2000

• Experiment Performance File, January 1, 2013 to present

• Select UCI Irradiation Requests for 2013 and 2014

• UCI Nuclear Reactor Facility Experiment Review Report- January 2014 b. Observations and Findings The UCI NRF has experimental procedures approved for a broad class of applications.

The mission of the UCI NRF is primarily to provide irradiation services to researchers and educational laboratory instruction; new experiments are uncommon. A new approved experimental procedure was created specifically for classroom applications.

The goal is to separate laboratory activities from classroom activities. The experimental procedures are typically reviewed by the ROC.

No experiments were performed during the inspection because of ongoing maintenance on the reactor. The inspector reviewed how experiments are performed in order to verify compliance with the TS and procedures. Additionally, from a random sampling of forms for experiments performed since the previous inspection, the inspector found that experiments were being reviewed and performed in accordance with TS requirements and the licensees written procedures.

c. Conclusions Experiments were being reviewed and performed in accordance with Technical Specification requirements and the licensees written procedures.

3. Radiation Protection Program a. Inspection Scope (IP 69001)

The inspector reviewed the following to verify compliance with 10 CFR Parts 19 and 20 and TS Sections 3.3 and 4.5 requirements:

Radiation and contamination surveys completed by reactor staff personnel Radiation and contamination surveys completed by Environmental Health and Safety (EHS) personnel UCI Nuclear Reactor Facility dosimetry records for 2013 through the present

-3-UCI NRF SOP No. 5, Radiological Safety Program, including the following:

- Section 5.1, Personnel Responsibilities and Actions, Rev. 3, approval dated March 2000

- Section 5.2, Radiation Monitoring Program, Rev 3.2, approval dated December 2009

- Section 5.3, Radiation Levels Associated with Handling of Radioactive Materials, Rev. 3, approval dated March 2000

- Section 5.4, Alert Levels, Rev. 3, approval dated March 2000

- Section 5.5, Surveillance and Calibration of Monitoring Instrumentation, Rev. 3.2, approval dated July 2007 The inspector interviewed licensee personnel, and radiological signs and postings were observed.

b. Observations and Findings (1) Surveys The inspector reviewed monthly radiation and contamination surveys of the licensee controlled areas conducted by the licensee staff and quarterly radiation and wipe surveys completed by campus Office of Environmental Health and Safety HP personnel. The results of the licensee staff surveys were documented on the forms and entered into a Reactor Health Physics notebook. The results of EHS surveys were documented on survey maps and forms, reviewed as required, and forwarded to the licensee for information.

(2) Postings and Notices The inspector reviewed the postings at the entrances to the facility controlled areas including the Control Room, the Reactor Room, and the two laboratories in the NRF.

The postings were acceptable and indicated the radiation hazards present. The facilitys radioactive material storage areas were noted to be properly posted.

Copies of notices to workers required by 10 CFR Part 19 were posted as required.

Copies of NRC Form-3, Notice to Employees, facility were posted in various areas throughout the facility. These locations included the bulletin board in the Outer Office/Counting Room leading to the Control Room and in the Control Room.

Caution signs, postings, and controls for radiation areas were as required in 10 CFR Part 20, Subpart J. Licensee personnel observed the precautions for access to radiation and other controlled areas.

(3) Dosimetry The licensee used thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs) for whole body monitoring of beta and gamma radiation exposure with an additional component to measure neutron radiation. The licensee used TLD finger rings for extremity monitoring.

-4-Dosimetry was issued to staff and visitors as outlined in licensee procedures. The issuing criteria met or exceeded the requirements of 10 CFR 20.1502 for individual monitoring. The dosimetry was supplied and processed by a National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP) accredited vendor, Miron Technologies.

Through direct observation, the inspector determined that dosimetry was acceptably used by facility personnel and exit frisking practices were in accordance with facility radiation protection requirements.

An examination of the TLD monitoring results indicating radiological exposures at the facility for the past two years through the present showed that the highest occupational doses, as well as doses to the public, were well within 10 CFR Part 20 limitations. The records showed that the highest annual whole body exposure received by a facility employee in 2013 was 15 mrem DDE and the highest annual extremity exposure was 519 mrem SDE.

(4) Radiation Protection Program The licensees Radiation Protection Program was established in the UCI Nuclear Reactor Facility SOP No. 5, Radiological Safety Program. The program was further explained in the campus document entitled, UCI Radiation Safety Manual, latest revision dated January 2009. The program required that all personnel who had unescorted access to work in a radiation area or with radioactive material receive training in radiation protection, policies, procedures, requirements, and facilities prior to entry. The inspector verified that licensee staff had received the required radiation protection (rad worker) training given by the UCI Office of Environmental Health and Safety.

The inspector determined that the UCI EHS office had completed an annual review of the radiation protection program in accordance with 10 CFR 20.1101(c) for 2013 as required. This was accomplished by the campus Radiation Safety Officer.

(5) As Low As Reasonably Achievable (ALARA) Policy The ALARA Policy was also outlined and established in the UCI Nuclear Reactor Facility SOP No. 5, Radiological Safety Program, and in other campus documents.

The ALARA program provided guidance for keeping doses as low as reasonably achievable and was consistent with the guidance in 10 CFR Part 20.

(6) Facility Tours The inspector toured the Control Room, the Reactor Room, the Pneumatic Tube Laboratory and the Preparation Laboratory within the NRF. Control of radioactive material and control of access to radiation and high radiation areas were acceptable.

The postings and signs for these areas were appropriate.

-5-c. Conclusions The inspector determined that the Radiation Protection and ALARA Programs, as implemented by the licensee, satisfied regulatory requirements because: 1) surveys were completed and documented acceptably to permit evaluation of the radiation hazards present; 2) postings met regulatory requirements; 3) personnel dosimetry was being worn as required and recorded doses were within the NRCs regulatory limits; 4) radiation survey and monitoring equipment was being maintained and calibrated as required; 5) the Radiation Protection and ALARA Programs satisfied regulatory requirements; and, 6) the radiation protection training program was acceptable.

4. Effluent and Environmental Monitoring a. Inspection Scope (IP 69001)

The inspector reviewed the following to verify compliance with the requirements of 10 CFR Part 20 and TS Sections 3.3 and 3.5:

Facility radioactive effluent releases and liquid and solid waste disposal documented in the UCI Nuclear Reactor Facility Annual Report for the period from July 1, 2012 through and June 30, 2013 Reactor pool water sample analyses documented on the applicable NRF forms UCI NRF SOP No. 5, Radiological Safety Program, Section 5.6, Radioactive Effluent Release Assessment, Rev 3, approval dated March 2000 UCI NRF SOP No. 5, Radiological Safety Program, Section 5.7, Radioactive Waste Procedure, Rev 3, approval dated March 2000 b. Observation and Findings Gaseous releases were monitored as required by TS, calculated as prescribed by procedure, and acceptably documented. The results indicated that the releases were well within Appendix B, Table 2 concentrations, and TS limits. To demonstrate compliance with the annual dose constraints of 10 CFR 20.1101(d), the licensee used the computational method specified in UCI NRF SOP No. 5, Section 5.6.

The licensee had released liquid from the facility, but only by transferring it to the Campus EHS Office under the State of California Radioactive Material License. Solid radioactive waste was also transferred to the Campus EHS Office. The liquid and solid waste was then stored, handled, and/or disposed of in accordance with the State license requirements.

c. Conclusion Effluent monitoring satisfied license and regulatory requirements and airborne releases were within the specified regulatory and TS limits.

-6-5. Committees, Audits, and Reviews a. Inspection Scope (IP 69001)

The inspector reviewed the following to ensure that the review and audit functions stipulated in the TS, as well as the 50.59 review functions, were being met:

Safety review and audit records for the past two years ROC meeting minutes from January 2013 to the present UCI NRF SOP No. 1, Introduction, Rev 3.2, approval dated January 2010 UCI Nuclear Reactor Facility Annual Report for the period from July 1, 2012 through June 30, 2013 b. Observations and Findings The ROC membership satisfied TS requirements and the licensee's procedural rules.

The ROC had semiannual meetings as required with a quorum being present at those meetings. Review of the committee meeting minutes indicated the ROC provided appropriate guidance and direction for reactor operations, and ensured suitable use and oversight of the reactor.

The review and audit function of the ROC stipulated in TS Section 6.2 was fulfilled by EHS personnel as they conducted their surveys and walk-through tours of the facility.

This was reported to the ROC through the EHS Report given during the semiannual ROC meetings. Since the last inspection all required audits of reactor facility activities and reviews of programs, procedures, and facility operations had been completed and documented.

c. Conclusions The review and audit program was being conducted acceptably by the Reactor Operations Committee.

6. Design Change Functions a. Inspection Scope (IP 69001)

The inspectors reviewed the following to verify compliance with the regulatory requirements of 10 CFR Part 50.59:

UCI Nuclear Reactor Facility Annual Report for the period from July 1, 2010 through and June 30, 2011 UCI NRF SOP No. 1-3, Implementation of Standard Operating Procedures and Facility Changes, Rev. 3-2, approved January 2010.

-7-b. Observations and Findings Facility changes or modifications were reviewed by the ROC and documented in the committees meeting minutes. Changes were controlled by requiring a staff evaluation and an ROC review. It was noted that SOP 1 had been revised to outline the change initiation and approval process. Completion of the changes or modifications was documented on forms that had been developed for that purpose and recorded in the Reactor Operations Logbook, which was also used to document maintenance activities at the facility. The inspector noted that various changes or modifications had been initiated by the licensee and subsequently approved by the ROC as required. The documentation and information concerning these changes and modifications were acceptable. Through this review, the inspector verified that the design change process at the facility was functioning as required and was acceptable for the current operation and staffing of the facility.

c. Conclusions The licensee's design change protocol was in place and was being implemented as required.

7. Transportation a. Inspection Scope (IP 86740)

The inspector reviewed the following to verify compliance with regulatory requirements for shipping licensed material:

Records of radioactive material shipments for 2013 through the date of this inspection UCI NRF SOP No. 5, Radiological Safety Program, Section 5.10, Transportation of Radioactive Material, Rev 3.1, approval dated May 2005 The inspector also interviewed licensee and EHS personnel.

b. Observations and Findings The transportation of radioactive material was reviewed. Through records review and discussions with licensee personnel, the inspector determined that the licensee had made various shipments of radioactive material since the previous inspection in this area. The records indicated that the radioisotope types and quantities were calculated and dose rates measured as required. The records also indicated that the shipping containers used were appropriate and had the appropriate markings as required. All radioactive material shipment records reviewed by the inspector had been completed in accordance with Department of Transportation and NRC regulatory requirements.

-8-c. Conclusions Radioactive material was shipped in accordance with licensee procedures and the applicable regulations. Staff personnel assigned to ship radioactive material had received the proper training as required as required.

8. Exit Interview The inspection scope and results were summarized on June 12, 2014, with members of licensee management. The inspector described the areas inspected and discussed in detail the inspection findings. No dissenting comments were received from the licensee.

PARTIAL LIST OF PERSONS CONTACTED Licensee G. Miller Reactor Supervisor A.J. Shaka Reactor Director J. Wallick Assistant Engineer Other Personnel R. Dendo UCI Health Physicist B. Ruiz UCI Radiation Safety Officer INSPECTION PROCEDURES USED IP 69001 Class II Research and Test Reactors IP 86740 Transportation ITEMS OPENED, CLOSED, AND DISCUSSED Opened None Closed None Discussed None

-2-PARTIAL LIST OF ACRONYMS USED ALARA As Low As Reasonably Achievable CFR Code of Federal Regulations EHS (Office of) Environmental Health and Safety EP Emergency Plan IP Inspection Procedure LCO Limiting Conditions for Operation NRC Nuclear Regulatory Commission NRF Nuclear Reactor Facility PARS Publicly Available Records ROC Reactor Operations Committee SOP Standard Operating Procedure SRO Senior Reactor Operator TLD Thermoluminescent Dosimeter TS Technical Specifications UCI University of California - Irvine UCI NRF University of California - Irvine Nuclear Reactor Facility