ML19208A089: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 17: Line 17:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:u ,, LICENSEE EVENT REPORT ccbactelocK.j i i ll)l@(PLE AsE F RINT CR TYPE ALL REQUIRED INFORf.iAT!oN)
{{#Wiki_filter:u ,,
, t@l4 1 l1 Il 1 @!l@lo li N iJ 0 lC lP l1 @l0 0-0 0 0 010- l0 0 7 8 9.lCENS EE COCE 14.E LICENSE NUYtE A
LICENSEE EVENT REPORT
;>.t LICE NSE TYPE A 53.A i SE CoTT oi1$ 'n2 l M @ l0 l5 lo lo lo l2 11 b l@l0I81017l719 l@l0 19 10 16 17 19 @
                ,    ccbactelocK.j                               i         i         l          l      )       l@                   (PLE AsE F RINT CR TYPE ALL REQUIRED INFORf.iAT!oN) t lo li                 N iJ         0 lC lP l1 @l0                                               0       -
S f,)td DOCK ET NyV9ER C4 EP Et ENT C ATE 74 75 HEPORT D AT E 80 d EVENT DEsCRIDTtoN AND FFoBAsLE CONSECUENCEs h a 12'l l On August 7, 1979, during routine surveillance of Core spray system I, I o 3 L parallel isolation valve v-20-Is became inope-able in the open position.
0     0   0     010 - l0                 0   @l4            1 l1 Il            1 @!53          l
li a3 4i i The circuit breaker for the motor operator tripped when the actuation j i oisi i pressure sensor was reset.
                                                                                                                                                                                                                  .A i SE
A parallel valve V-20-40, which is actuated l!:le by the same pressure sensor, operated normally.
                                                                                                                                                                                                                            @
Valve stroking currents lwere read with the breaker reset and found to be normal.
7             8 9           .lCENS EE COCE                           14             .E                             LICENSE NUYtE A                         ;>     .t         LICE NSE TYPE A CoTT oi1                   $ 'n2 l M @tdl0 l5 loDOCK                                      lo ET          l2 11 b l@l0I81017l719 loNyV9ER                                                        l@l0 19 74        75 10     16 17 1980 @
The valve was
HEPORT D AT E d            S                           f,)                                                                                 C4     EP       Et ENT C ATE EVENT DEsCRIDTtoN AND FFoBAsLE CONSECUENCEs h a 12'l l                       On August 7, 1979, during routine surveillance of Core spray system I,                                                                                                                               I o     3 L                 parallel isolation valve v-20-Is became inope-able in the open position.                                                                                                                             l i a3 4i i                           The circuit breaker for the motor operator tripped when the actuation                                                                                                                             j i oisi i                           pressure sensor was reset.                                                         A parallel valve V-20-40, which is actuated                                                                       l
!lal : i i , O i E I i_
  !:le                               by the same pressure sensor, operated normally.                                                                             Valve stroking currents                                                   l lal : i i                          were read with the breaker reset and found to be normal.                                                                                         The valve was                                       !
stroked to determine operability and resurveilled without incident.
  , O i E I i_                       stroked to determine operability and resurveilled without incident.                                                                                                                                   l E y                                                                                                                                                                                                                     '
l'E y Y *-'.YE!''S
Y *-                             '.YE!                   ''S
* E JES:;$$t=t c:.; T C= E
* E                 =   t c:.; T C= E                     JES:                ;$$t
! 19]!S ! F @X l@ lZl@ lC lK 'T B lR lK@lA @ lZ l@
  ! 19]
t a u 2 3 o a SEOLENTI AL OCC A E E '.CE REFONT A E' 'i'ON c: ;-E' :NT N E:A EE80HT NO CODE TvFE f. O.@ 4..id 17 l9 ll-ll012l8ll/ll0l3lLll-l0l'__ ; 1 22 a;4;C;7;E C3.31 22 ACT;O'-JT GE EFFEC'$ * ' , 7 0 C .* ' .
t
ATT AC <* ' E NT t.P R D-4 FRYE CCY8 COYPONENT.TarEt ACT CN ON PL ANT. E T ** O C eCUAS id SUE YtTT ED F C A '. SLS.
                                              !S ! F @                               a X l@ lZl@             u lC lK 'T 2
SLFPL'E A'' AN U F AC T L, A E G l 0 l0 l0 l0 lY l@lNl@lN @lGl018 0 l(g!X@l Z l@lZl@, 40 41 4 43 44 47 Jo Ji ct _ *,Es:P'eT;c , - so CcaaEcrive actions @
B lR lK 3
5:_t l_The apparent cause of the occurrence was the high motor current drawn
                                                                                                                                                                    @lAo @ lZa l@
;-;-L when a valve close signal was inadvertently initiated during the period l:lwhen the valve was still stroking open.
SEOLENTI AL                           OCC A E E '.CE           REFONT                         A E' 'i'ON c: ;-           E' :NT N E:A                                                       EE80HT NO                                   CODE                 TvFE                               f. O.
All associated electrical l-components were. functionally tested and found satisfactory.
                    @ 4..id 17 l9 '
The sur-lveillance procedure was revised.
__ ; 1               22 l-l a
Motor current tests were performed.
l012l8l
j 1 i;7 2 3 80 F ACILITYlv YETHCD C5 STAT 5 F O .N E A OT*d E R ST ATUS ~
                                                                                                                ;4             ;C l/l
D'5CC% E hY DiSCOV E R N C ESC R1DTiO'.
                                                                                                                                          ;7 l0l3l
Je: LEj h l1 l0 l0 @
                                                                                                                                                          ;E         C3             .
NAllR l@lOperator observation.
Ll            l-31 l0l 22 ACT;O'       -JT GE                       EFFEC'                     $ * ' , 7 0 C .* ' .                                 ATT AC <* ' E NT
i s 7 E 9 10 52 1 "3 44 45 46 EO ACT:vtTV CONTENT Rest-;EG OF RE LE ASE A*'Ou'iT OF ACTIVITY LOC A''CN Cc RELE ASE ~"".lc l l Z @ Zl@l NAlNAl1 7 8 9 10$1 44 45 pa FEa. '.E L ! y PCS R E$
                                                                                                                                                          .            t.P R D-4         FRYE CCY8                   COYPONENT TarEt         ACT CN                   ON PL ANT                         . E T ** O C                     eCUAS     id     SUE YtTT ED       F C A '. SLS.         SLFPL'E A           '' AN U F AC T L, A E G
o_i. E r*TY E CESCMTION --
                    !X                        @                l Z l@                          lZl@                  ,
.D'i 0l0l0lhlZIhl NA e .n u o 3,'' C * , '. E L i , ; ., n FC-r" ''e%C E ,. '. P i p i i ., *.
l 0 l0 l0 l0                 lY l@
7 , 0 l 0 l@[NA 1 i,'lj.0-, OFACIL*TVg
41 lNl@                 lN @             lGl018 0 l(g Jo                  Ji                      40                         4                     43             44                       47 ct _ *,Es:P'eT;c , - so CcaaEcrive actions @
'l 9 0 9 1 2 0 Q
  -
" L A t.7l1 l9l d!y NA u , EUC UCL O''.LY
5:_t l_                      The apparent cause of the occurrence was the high motor current drawn                                                                                                                                 ;
,, 5 _It!l\lC,lWeekly news release - september 12, 1979.
          ;-         L                 when a valve close signal was inadvertently initiated during the period                                                                                                                                 l
lll ll llIiltl l l
:       l when the valve was still stroking open.                                                                   All associated electrical                                                                   l
.u ,_ : Donald A. Ross 201 !.55-8784
            -                           components were. functionally tested and found satisfactory.                                                                                           The sur-                                       l 1 i;                              veillance procedure was revised.                                                             Motor current tests were performed.                                                                     j 7           2 3                                                                                                                                                                                                                       80 F ACILITY            l                                                                                  v      YETHCD C5 STAT 5                   : F O .N E A                                     OT*d E R ST ATUS ~                 D'5CC% E hY                                 DiSCOV E R N C ESC R1DTiO'.       Je i    s        LEj h l1 l0 l0 @                                                                     NA                    l    lR  l@l46                            Operator observation.
..a.t c c :+ p e. , pggyg  
7           E 9                       10                     52             1 "3                                         44     45                                                                                                 EO ACT:vtTV         CONTENT Rest-;EG OF RE LE ASE                                         A*'Ou'iT OF ACTIVITY                   "
.*rw-" - --Jersey Central Pcwer & Light Company ( ) '' C q {,'
LOC A''CN Cc RELE ASE ~"                                   .
ff i f/ad son A.eque at Punch Bowl Road
NA 7
; , 4" , ac .f/ctr;stchn. New Jersey 07960 1-a'(201)455-8200 OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION Forked River, New Jersey 08731 Licensee Event Report Reportable Occurrence No. 50-219/79-28/3L-0
1 lc8 l9 l Z @ Zl@l               10             $
-Report Date September 6, 1979 Occurrence Date August 7, 1979 Identification of Occurrence Core Spray System parallel isolation va!ve V-20-15 became inoperable in the open position when the motor breaker tripped.
1 NA 44 l
This event is considered to be a reportable occurrence as defined in the Technical Specifications, pa rag ra ph 6. 9. 2. B. 2.
45                                                                                           pa l
FEa o_    . '.E L ! y PCS R E$
                          . i. E r*                 TY E               CESCMTION --
D 'ie              .
0l0l0lhlZIhl       n           u                 o NA 3,'
                        -r  ' C * , '. E L i , ; ., n FC
                                    %                 C E ,. '. P i p i i "
                                                                          ., *.''                                                                                              7   ,
e
                                                                                                                                                                                '
    -
: j.            0 0 l 0 l@[                                                                                             NA                                                   1         i,   ,
l
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        "
L    A    t.
OFACIL*TVg                                                                                                       'l 9 0 9 1 2 0 Q 7 l1 l9l d!y                                                                                                                         NA u
                                                  ,
                                                ,, 5 _
EUC UCL O''.LY
.      It!l\lC,l                                                    Weekly news release - september 12, 1979.                                                                               l      ll ll llIiltl l l u     ,
_ :
                                    .a.t c c :+ p e. ,                                         Donald A. Ross                                                            pggyg               201 !.55-8784                                    .
 
            .
* rw                 -       " - - -
Jersey Central Pcwer & Light Company
( ) '' C q {,'         ff           i                                       f/ad son A.eque at Punch Bowl Road
; ,
1-a'                                4   "                                         f/ctr;stchn. New Jersey 07960
                ,  ac .
(201)455-8200 OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION Forked River, New Jersey 08731 Licensee Event Report Reportable Occurrence No. 50-219/79-28/3L-0
                                                                                                                      -
Report Date September 6, 1979 Occurrence Date August 7, 1979 Identification of Occurrence Core Spray System           parallel isolation va!ve V-20-15 became inoperable in the open position when the motor breaker tripped. This event is considered to be a reportable occurrence as defined in the Technical Specifications, pa rag ra ph 6. 9. 2. B. 2.
Conditions Prior to Occurrence The plant was operating at steady state power.
Conditions Prior to Occurrence The plant was operating at steady state power.
Power: Core, 1930 MWt Electric, 641 MWe 4 Floa: Recirculating, 15.2 x 10 gpm Feedwater, 7.143 x 106 lb/hr Stack Gas:
Power:         Core, 1930 MWt Electric, 641 MWe Floa:           Recirculating, 15.2 x 10 gpm   4 Feedwater, 7.143 x 106       lb/hr Stack Gas:     34,100 pci/sec Description of Occurrence On Tuesday, August 7, 1979, at approximately 2:00             p.m., during routine surveillance of Core Spray System I, parallel isolation valve V-20-15 motor circuit breaker tripped when the actuation pressure sensor was reset.
34,100 pci/sec Description of Occurrence On Tuesday, August 7, 1979, at approximately 2:00 p.m., during routine surveillance of Core Spray System I, parallel isolation valve V-20-15 motor circuit breaker tripped when the actuation pressure sensor was reset.
The parallel valve V-20-40, which is actuated by the same pressure sensor, operated normally.           The circuit breaker for V-204 5 was meggered as were the motor and cables with no abnormal conditions found. Valve stroking currents were read with the breaker reset and the tripping elements were tested to determine their setpoints.           All parameters were found to be normal.           The valve was stroked to determine operability and resurveilled without incident.
The parallel valve V-20-40, which is actuated by the same pressure sensor, operated normally.
(p?         '' ' R
The circuit breaker for V-204 5 was meggered as were the motor and cables with no abnormal conditions found.
                                                                                            , -, a     c. u s - y C.-c'% Pon . L@ Cony n , r ' ' m : r c' in- Gr c < R a c U:- _: : eT
Valve stroking currents were read with the breaker reset and the tripping elements were tested to determine their setpoints.
 
All parameters were found to be normal.
.
The valve was stroked to determine operability and resurveilled without incident.(p?'' ' R , -, a c.u s - y C.-c'% Pon . L@ Cony n , r ' ' m : r c' in- Gr c < R a c U:- _: : eT  
Reportable Occurrence No. 50-219/79-28/3L-0                                     Page 2 September 6, 1979 Apparent Cause of Occurrence The apparent cause of the occurrence was the inadvertent initiation of a valve close signal during the period when the valve was still stroking open.
.Reportable Occurrence No. 50-219/79-28/3L-0 Page 2 September 6, 1979 Apparent Cause of Occurrence The apparent cause of the occurrence was the inadvertent initiation of a valve close signal during the period when the valve was still stroking open.
This occurs when the valve open signal is removed in less time than is re-quired for the valve to assume the full open stop position.         The i.     .itaneous reversal in direction of the motor operator is not the intended mode of operation. Reversal cf motor inertia while driving requires greater torque causing greater than normal starting current to be seen by the motor circuit breaker. The added current is believed to have causea the circuit breaker to trip.
This occurs when the valve open signal is removed in less time than is re-quired for the valve to assume the full open stop position.
Analysis of Occurrence The safety significance of this event is ;onsidered to be minimal, since each of the parallel isolation valve: are designed fcr rated system flow and the alternate parallel valve, V-20 43, functioned as designed.       Had the Core Spray System been required at the time the valve became inoperable, the system would have operated as intended.
The i..itaneous reversal in direction of the motor operator is not the intended mode of operation.
Corrective Action initial corrective action consisted of the testing of the breaker and electrical valve components to assure proper functional capability and designed setpoints. In addition, the surveillance procedure was revised to include more specific guidance to avoid inadvertent operational modes.
Reversal cf motor inertia while driving requires greater torque causing greater than normal starting current to be seen by the motor circuit breaker.The added current is believed to have causea the circuit breaker to trip.Analysis of Occurrence The safety significance of this event is ;onsidered to be minimal, since each of the parallel isolation valve: are designed fcr rated system flow and the alternate parallel valve, V-20 43, functioned as designed.
Had the Core Spray System been required at the time the valve became inoperable, the system would have operated as intended.
Corrective Action initial corrective action consisted of the testing of the breaker and electrical valve components to assure proper functional capability and designed setpoints.
In addition, the surveillance procedure was revised to include more specific guidance to avoid inadvertent operational modes.
Subsequently, a test was conducted by the electrical staff to demonstrate the changes in current magnitude during simulated identical conditions.
Subsequently, a test was conducted by the electrical staff to demonstrate the changes in current magnitude during simulated identical conditions.
The starting current during an instantaneous reversal in motor direction was found to be approximately 20% higher than normal starting current which tends to confirm the susoected cause for breaker trip.
The starting current during an instantaneous reversal in motor direction was found to be approximately 20% higher than normal starting current which tends to confirm the susoected cause for breaker trip. The same current / time traces were made under similar conditions for parallel isolation valve V-20-40.
The same current / time traces were made under similar conditions for parallel isolation valve V-20-40.
Since the results show the identical response found for V-20-15, we are assured that such response is not indicative of component failure or abnormal rea:tions of circuit elements.
Since the results show the identical response found for V-20-15, we are assured that such response is not indicative of component failure or abnormal rea:tions of circuit elements.
Failure Data None O .' ($ '_ ';a.}}
Failure Data None O
                                                              ;
                                                                .' a(     $ '_ '
                                                                          .}}

Revision as of 15:28, 19 October 2019

LER 79-028/03L-0:on 790807,during Routine Surveillance of Core Spray Sys 1,parallel Isolation Valve V-20-15 Became Inoperable in Open Position.Caused by High Motor Current Drawn When Close Signal Inadvertently Initiated
ML19208A089
Person / Time
Site: Oyster Creek
Issue date: 09/06/1979
From: Ross D
JERSEY CENTRAL POWER & LIGHT CO.
To:
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
Shared Package
ML19208A087 List:
References
LER-79-028-03L, LER-79-28-3L, NUDOCS 7909120521
Download: ML19208A089 (3)


Text

u ,,

LICENSEE EVENT REPORT

, ccbactelocK.j i i l l ) l@ (PLE AsE F RINT CR TYPE ALL REQUIRED INFORf.iAT!oN) t lo li N iJ 0 lC lP l1 @l0 0 -

0 0 0 010 - l0 0 @l4 1 l1 Il 1 @!53 l

.A i SE

@

7 8 9 .lCENS EE COCE 14 .E LICENSE NUYtE A  ;> .t LICE NSE TYPE A CoTT oi1 $ 'n2 l M @tdl0 l5 loDOCK lo ET l2 11 b l@l0I81017l719 loNyV9ER l@l0 19 74 75 10 16 17 1980 @

HEPORT D AT E d S f,) C4 EP Et ENT C ATE EVENT DEsCRIDTtoN AND FFoBAsLE CONSECUENCEs h a 12'l l On August 7, 1979, during routine surveillance of Core spray system I, I o 3 L parallel isolation valve v-20-Is became inope-able in the open position. l i a3 4i i The circuit breaker for the motor operator tripped when the actuation j i oisi i pressure sensor was reset. A parallel valve V-20-40, which is actuated l

!:le by the same pressure sensor, operated normally. Valve stroking currents l lal : i i were read with the breaker reset and found to be normal. The valve was  !

, O i E I i_ stroked to determine operability and resurveilled without incident. l E y '

Y *- '.YE! S

  • E = t c:.; T C= E JES:  ;$$t

! 19]

t

!S ! F @ a X l@ lZl@ u lC lK 'T 2

B lR lK 3

@lAo @ lZa l@

SEOLENTI AL OCC A E E '.CE REFONT A E' 'i'ON c: ;- E' :NT N E:A EE80HT NO CODE TvFE f. O.

@ 4..id 17 l9 l '

__ ; 1 22 l-l a

l012l8l

4 ;C l/l
7 l0l3l
E C3 .

Ll l-31 l0l 22 ACT;O' -JT GE EFFEC' $ * ' , 7 0 C .* ' . ATT AC <* ' E NT

. t.P R D-4 FRYE CCY8 COYPONENT TarEt ACT CN ON PL ANT . E T ** O C eCUAS id SUE YtTT ED F C A '. SLS. SLFPL'E A AN U F AC T L, A E G

!X @ l Z l@ lZl@ ,

l 0 l0 l0 l0 lY l@

41 lNl@ lN @ lGl018 0 l(g Jo Ji 40 4 43 44 47 ct _ *,Es:P'eT;c , - so CcaaEcrive actions @

-

5:_t l_ The apparent cause of the occurrence was the high motor current drawn  ;

- L when a valve close signal was inadvertently initiated during the period l
l when the valve was still stroking open. All associated electrical l

- components were. functionally tested and found satisfactory. The sur- l 1 i; veillance procedure was revised. Motor current tests were performed. j 7 2 3 80 F ACILITY l v YETHCD C5 STAT 5  : F O .N E A OT*d E R ST ATUS ~ D'5CC% E hY DiSCOV E R N C ESC R1DTiO'. Je i s LEj h l1 l0 l0 @ NA l lR l@l46 Operator observation.

7 E 9 10 52 1 "3 44 45 EO ACT:vtTV CONTENT Rest-;EG OF RE LE ASE A*'Ou'iT OF ACTIVITY "

LOC ACN Cc RELE ASE ~" .

NA 7

1 lc8 l9 l Z @ Zl@l 10 $

1 NA 44 l

45 pa l

FEa o_ . '.E L ! y PCS R E$

. i. E r* TY E CESCMTION --

D 'ie .

0l0l0lhlZIhl n u o NA 3,'

-r ' C * , '. E L i , ; ., n FC

% C E ,. '. P i p i i "

., *. 7 ,

e

'

-

j. 0 0 l 0 l@[ NA 1 i, ,

l

"

L A t.

OFACIL*TVg 'l 9 0 9 1 2 0 Q 7 l1 l9l d!y NA u

,

,, 5 _

EUC UCL O.LY

. It!l\lC,l Weekly news release - september 12, 1979. l ll ll llIiltl l l u ,

_ :

.a.t c c :+ p e. , Donald A. Ross pggyg 201 !.55-8784 .

.

  • rw - " - - -

Jersey Central Pcwer & Light Company

( ) C q {,' ff i f/ad son A.eque at Punch Bowl Road

,

1-a' 4 " f/ctr;stchn. New Jersey 07960

, ac .

(201)455-8200 OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION Forked River, New Jersey 08731 Licensee Event Report Reportable Occurrence No. 50-219/79-28/3L-0

-

Report Date September 6, 1979 Occurrence Date August 7, 1979 Identification of Occurrence Core Spray System parallel isolation va!ve V-20-15 became inoperable in the open position when the motor breaker tripped. This event is considered to be a reportable occurrence as defined in the Technical Specifications, pa rag ra ph 6. 9. 2. B. 2.

Conditions Prior to Occurrence The plant was operating at steady state power.

Power: Core, 1930 MWt Electric, 641 MWe Floa: Recirculating, 15.2 x 10 gpm 4 Feedwater, 7.143 x 106 lb/hr Stack Gas: 34,100 pci/sec Description of Occurrence On Tuesday, August 7, 1979, at approximately 2:00 p.m., during routine surveillance of Core Spray System I, parallel isolation valve V-20-15 motor circuit breaker tripped when the actuation pressure sensor was reset.

The parallel valve V-20-40, which is actuated by the same pressure sensor, operated normally. The circuit breaker for V-204 5 was meggered as were the motor and cables with no abnormal conditions found. Valve stroking currents were read with the breaker reset and the tripping elements were tested to determine their setpoints. All parameters were found to be normal. The valve was stroked to determine operability and resurveilled without incident.

(p? ' R

, -, a c. u s - y C.-c'% Pon . L@ Cony n , r ' ' m : r c' in- Gr c < R a c U:- _: : eT

.

Reportable Occurrence No. 50-219/79-28/3L-0 Page 2 September 6, 1979 Apparent Cause of Occurrence The apparent cause of the occurrence was the inadvertent initiation of a valve close signal during the period when the valve was still stroking open.

This occurs when the valve open signal is removed in less time than is re-quired for the valve to assume the full open stop position. The i. .itaneous reversal in direction of the motor operator is not the intended mode of operation. Reversal cf motor inertia while driving requires greater torque causing greater than normal starting current to be seen by the motor circuit breaker. The added current is believed to have causea the circuit breaker to trip.

Analysis of Occurrence The safety significance of this event is ;onsidered to be minimal, since each of the parallel isolation valve: are designed fcr rated system flow and the alternate parallel valve, V-20 43, functioned as designed. Had the Core Spray System been required at the time the valve became inoperable, the system would have operated as intended.

Corrective Action initial corrective action consisted of the testing of the breaker and electrical valve components to assure proper functional capability and designed setpoints. In addition, the surveillance procedure was revised to include more specific guidance to avoid inadvertent operational modes.

Subsequently, a test was conducted by the electrical staff to demonstrate the changes in current magnitude during simulated identical conditions.

The starting current during an instantaneous reversal in motor direction was found to be approximately 20% higher than normal starting current which tends to confirm the susoected cause for breaker trip. The same current / time traces were made under similar conditions for parallel isolation valve V-20-40.

Since the results show the identical response found for V-20-15, we are assured that such response is not indicative of component failure or abnormal rea:tions of circuit elements.

Failure Data None O

.' a( $ '_ '

.