ML19208B474

Requests Docketing of Encl Ltrs:Secure,Adequate,Future Energy 790802 Ltr,League Against Nuclear Dangers 790828 Submittal of Objections to Facility,Wi Job Svc 790802 Reply to Anl & Other Related Correspondence

ML19208B474
Person / Time
Site:	05000502, 05000503
Issue date:	09/17/1979
From:	Nathanson M ARGONNE NATIONAL LABORATORY
To:	Cota P Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NUDOCS 7909200381
Download: ML19208B474 (125)

Text

,$'..

USDge,w d Ewy ARCONNE NATIONAL LABORATORY 9XX) SouTii CAss As au, Ampu, finois 60439 Tdq1oc 312/972- 3147 September 17, 1979 N . 50 gb >$

Philip Coda Mail Stop PS28 Division of Site Safety and Environmental Analysis U.S. N.R.C Phillips Building Washington, D.C. 20555

Dear Mr. Coda:

Would you please docket these letters for the Haven Project?

Thank you.

Sincerely, A1. @..N 8 m M. R. Nathanson Division of Environmental Impact Studies MRN:ae Enc.

W-m ccl 6 009 n1u*wTyaa*xp ARCpW OAER5iTiES ASSoOATiON 79092 00 3 b f

.

.

tsw w . s.

w * = r ~ c. a- .,.

731 Wisconsin River Drive Port Edwards, WI 54469 August 2,1979 Mr. Michael Nathanson Argonne National Laboratories Building 10 Argonne, IL 60439

Dear Mr. Nathanson:

As I indicatec in our phone conversation, the announcement by the utilities in 1974 that the Rudolph area was under consideration as a possible site for an atomic-fueled electrical generating facility led to a number of both pro and con activities in the area. Pro activities included pr.ssing resolu-tions favoring the project by the aren Chamber of Commerce, the Wood County board, and the Town of Rudolph. The Town of Rudolph later res-cinded its resolution under political pressure from the local antinuclear organization LAND (League Against Nuclear Danger). The Chamber of Commerce and the county board resolutions have been sustained a few times against similar political pressure by LAND. They remain active and seem to me to follow the party line of all the antinuclear groups around the world.

Other pro activities included the establishment of SAFE (Secure Adequate Future Energy), an organization of labor, business, agriculture, and professional individuals in support of economic and business development and adequs.te energy availability. Over 100 people attended SAFE's organizational meeting in June of 1974. SAFE was organized as a non-profit organization and is supported by dues from its members. Significant projects by SAFE in 1974 included door-to-door survey on July 11-15, 1974, in the Rudolph area which showed a majority for the project and a town hall meeting on October 17, 1974, in Rudolph to air the issues. The meeting featured a panel of experts who answered questions from the floor and one of our local judges as moderator. It was well received. Early in January,1975, SAFE initiated an effort to create a statewide coalition that led to the organization on June 16, 1975, of the Wisconsin Energy Coalition. SAFE later joined WEC as one of its dues-paying members.

The objectives of WEC are similar to those of SAFE. I have attached a number of items that will serve to summarize the main points.

Since 1975 the scene of the action has been in other areas of the state, including the state capital, so Wood County has been relatively quiet.

Should the utilities decide to return to Wood County with plans to build, O f6 QjC

. ,.

Mr. Michael Nathanson Argonne National Laboratories Page 2 August 2,1979 it's my guess the situation would be the same as before; i. e. , an active, very mile. ant minority blocking action in the courts.

Good luck with your study.

Very truly yours, T. O. Norris, Member SAFE Executive Committee TON:SN i

0 7Iv

[s d '

076 01 <)

. .

.

.

LET'S ALL TURN OUT AT THE LABOR TEMPLE, 7:30 P.M., MONDAY, JUNE 17

.

Friends:

Our org'anizational meeting is Monday at the Labor Temple, 7:30 P.M. Please be there. Bring a friend, if you will, who is interested in telling the true story-of Central Wisconsin future energy needs and how we can best guarantee safe energy for our future.

A slate of officers will be submitted. A name for our organization will b- chosen. " People for Safe Energy" was proposed June 6th, uut no final decision made.

I believe our group of labor, management, business, education people and interested citizens can do a service to Portage and Wood Counties. We can see that the many legitimate questions of energy needs and power supply here are factually answered.

And, if a Central Wisconsin nuclear energy plant is the best answer for our needs, we can let the world know that such a power source is welcome.

See you Monday, 7:30 -

.

e j

.

. . .

Lloyd Mitchell, President Central Labor Council - Wisconsin Rapids and Vicinity t ' [ (, O\

.

e .

-

I 1

I Editorial Page

'

,

THE DAILY 5__ TRIBUNE

_ _ . . _ _ . . . . _

!

! Daily Tribune letter Box

! oescr o re re .re - t, r .o e . -

et thinety tieerest to the Laeter aos ter . To se ove*6emed. he-I tore esaut beer ete eenhora e( end eenopfese gedrene one seest not

.

eenenha .neere stem 350 mores, Tha_ Daehr Tr+m renarues the _e_tg to j est .e e, I

,

What about power * ' S e c u r e Adequate Future phats, environmenty Energy" organization, with

\

To the editor: l Wood. Portage, htarathon In 1969, the Environm I county representatives from Prorartian Agency conductegad labor, insurance, industnes, InNstigation of damage / 'd utilities, civic parties, formed C h kis tm a s tne plant =fl*!I to present all the aspects of withfn a 23 mile radius cp the the acceptability of n u c1e a r Mt. Storm poucer plant, ant operated by the V ma power plants. Some !.AND Ehctric and Power Cow (League Against Nuclear De j trees affected y ai[r. Danger) memb, were pollstion were '. ier present.

whi e phe and spruce and < ;;9 . One group formed around a fount to suffer frog anor} radiologist and intelligent, aeedL* Syndrome. Bile simp deserving opimons were ex-oneans the tms wmfdwuf changed, unct the final " boil and the foliage was arse and down" came to insurance d '

coverage from nuclear power The MtA Storm poorer plant was equipsed with electrostatic (plants). His claim was that at pncipitam which p sup. D resent he holds a policy (3 i

posed to regnove fly ash fron year coverage), that does not the smoke emissig; howevet have a nuclear exclusion it was found- that as much an written into it. (which he said 60 tons of fly ash per hour could he would not show). His is escape. Also sis found that definitely the insurance com-600 Ibs. of th arides were pany every homeowner should emitted dany. l get coverage with,~ rgainst I am by no tuans a chemisti nuclear disaster.

but the conct.sfon of the EP4 Our policies, dated back to study is easdyftnderstood; 2 4 1968; current one 4 25.'74; emissions of coal @urning Dwet e.nt companies, both nad, plants turn into acid wber "!. css mixed with l w othe- "NucJear by nuclear Eaclusion" reaction or nuclear sources of wap:r.llt was fourul radiation a ndicactive con.

mat une Wan was mm tamination, all whether con-

'#

• I trolled or uncontrolled, or due g,

wMch arie to any act or condition incident tw certain closely Wl tttheir pab to any of ce legoang, is NOT related t.cular environment such insured agamst by this Ex.

IndustHes as foreh , product ( tended Coverage Endorsement, cranbernes,l Christnas treek. *tiether such loss be dire-t or r and Jrrigate$ canniq; crops all indirect, proximate or , remote of these growing things are very (near or far), or be in whole sensittee to changts in tht or in"part caused by, con-erreironment. I tributed to, or aggrav?.ted by

, I know t!}at if a uttllty really{ windstorm, hail, explosion, riot, wants to build a pov*r plant riot attending a stnke, civil they wtB trf to convin's us tha{ commotion, aircraft, vehicles or somehow their plantk wiH be smoke eM nuclear reaction or different. pwy will L to ud, nuclear radiation or radioactive and tempt ms with jobs tar' contammation, all whether tre (for our ans. They controlled or uncontrolled, is not wiu also ppint out that it would " explosion" or " smoke."

be safer man de ph Your homeowner's policy has Remem when they told us this clause in it. Find it.

ill wouldn't ink How about your auto or health I

D %I Q the muchK, raft insuance. ounti= these with Phil Helmer your insuror.

b 7 n -

1000 3rd 3L ff. a Why can't insurance com-panies give fu!! coverage i

b Notes nuclear exclusion against radiation or damage? or

]OI k la insurance policies jusufication for the nuclear

} exclusion.

L V

j yd  ;

To the editor

• With a possible nuclear plant The meeting after the meeting coming to Rudolph, Wood

- whm a gnet deal of the County, we should question our

" meat" of an encounter with , insurance agents, they question ind.viduals comes out. Puch their companies, who in turn animated exchange, worthy had better question the utilities *

"

comments (are) m a d e in an nuclear insurance subsidized by G, informal atmosphere, as small the taxpayer - you!

p }

O groups tooved about after the Mrs. Joseph Groshek k3 f' C) - meeting and formation of the Rt.1, Jtudolph r , , .

Q.g a w,... a .. _ ,

.. .u w._.. . . . .-.

. .

-

.

June 17 Organizational Meeting - People For Safe Energy Lacor Temple - 7 : 30 P.M.

A Possible Program:

Open: Welcome by Temporary Chairman, Lloyd Mitchell I. Why We're Here:

A) The Winter Energy Crunch scared us all. Don't want any 2 day weeks like paper industry had out East this

• winter.

B) Took it for granted if Wood County was best site for Nuclear Energy Plant, it would be built herg .

C. Now realize we let a small, but loud, emotional leader-ship group represent us in their shrill opposition to the plant. Group is led by many of the same unreasonable environmentalists who wanted to close the paper mills and turn the Tomorrow River into a hatchery for carp and other rough fish. We here in Wood County don't u n w a ,.Y A.f f g-tf ,ih

_vilmum e.vfmsev_. cit-

'

need U'; S L- . _ 7- ...;--

ting w. -.. a c'r-o M itier^4 E irac 'riti c mbe telling us how we don' t need a local energy source for our factorics and our homes.

D? ~Now, it appears because of this emotional opposition to the Rudolph Energy Plant, we may lose it to South-eastern Wisconsin, where they really want the plant and are asking the utilities to build there, rather than telling them to go away as a small group here has done. . , ,

\

it / G t, . \ I$

.

. .

E. So, we're here to organize.our own citizen. group which .

can do two things....

1) See that honest, factual answers are given by learned sources to the legitimate questions being asked of this energy plant.

2) And, if a Central Wisconsin nuclear energy plant is the best answer flor our future needs here, then

- our group has got to tell the people about it and let the utilities, politicians and news media know that such an energy source is welcome here.

II. What Has Been Done:

A. Labor decided enough is enough. Last Monday we invited a group of about 40 to meet with us. We wondered why management at the paper companies, Sentry Insurance, the University had been so quiet. We found great support for our own belief that the majority of business-industry-labor here is not opposed to an. energy plant. .

.B. The group decided to organize, then go out and work toward getting the guaranteed energy we need...and to

'

assuring ourselves it would be a safe source of energy.

Here we are tonight.

III. Any Questions So Far? Discussion?

~

(We will not, of course, be trapped into any emotional dis-cussions about nuclear energy. This meeting is for those either uncommitted on the issue and seeking answers from experts, or those totally committed to getting a future source of local power right at our doorstep.)

. "/6 015

.

. .

..

.

.

IV. Election of Officers - ,

.

Nominating Committee formed at last meeting, Chaired by myself, has met and submits the following slate for officers:

- Cnairman, Tom Fogarty, Wis. Rapids, and

- Vice Chairman, Max Andre, Wis. Rapids, and Consolidated Paper Co.

- Secretary, Bill Cownie, Wis. Rapids, Executive Secretary, Chamber of Commerce.

- Treasurer, Rita Bemke, Rudolph.

- Portage County Coordinator, Hal Holtz, Stevens Point.

- Wood County Coordinator, Bill Mengel, Wis. Rapids,

. Mengel Construction.

- At Large Executive Coramittee Members,

- Ken Willett, Stevens Point

- Dr. Dave McMillan , Stevens Point, and a UW-SP Physics Professor

- Dr. Terry Norris, Port Edwards, Nekoosa-Edward s

- Lloyd Mitchell, Wisconsin Rapids V. (Tom Fogarty takes over af ter election. ) .

A.- Name the organization

(" People Fcr SLfc Energy" was suggested last week. . .

Do I have auditional name suggestions?

(List suggestions.)

B. Show of hands for most popular name.

< , 7 ,f .

i(f O}U

.

.

,

VI. Committees Organized - Based on objectives of the organiza-tion - Chairmen appointed or elected.

A. Finance Committee - How to raise the money to do the needed job. -

B. Comaunications Committee - How to tell the citizens, media, politicians what we're doing.

C. Activities Committee - Decide the means to tell our story.

For example -

Newspaper ads; Letters to newspapers; Town Hall Informational Meetings; Asking the utilities and big energy users to present their cases, etc. -

(The Executive Committee will oversee registration of the group with state and other organization functions.)

VII. Secretary - Read names off of evdryone signed in. Ask each to announce his Committee choice.

(Committees will meet briefly after the session to choose a Chairman and Vice Chairman.)

VIII. From the Floor - Suggestion of one quick event - The Town Hall Meeting. Ask Portage County person to explain hov it works.

How about a panel of experts to answer community questions about Nuclear Energy and this plant?

June 29th - A possible date - at the Labor Temple?

Then everyone here plan to be here June 29th - Activities Committee can discuss how to pull off Town Hall. Bring a friend - 2 or 3 friends - to the Town Hall. ,,

, 7, o(, Okl

.

4

. .,

.. A - Suggest - Committees will want to meet in meantime -

'

B - S(.hedule next full me7 ting of this orntnization for July _.

IX. Adjourn to Comnittees.

.

O e

G e

e 0

-./ h~ k O

.

OfD

. .

• .

.

a Wisconsin Electric Power Company

.

Wisconsin rower and' Light Company Wisconsin Public Service Corporation Madison GE.s and Electric Company From- Wisconsin Electric Power Company

l West Michigan Street Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53203 Contact: J. H. McLean Release 9:00 AM CDT 414 - 273-1234 June 26, 1974 Wisconsin Rapids: Representatives of four Wisconsin Utility Companies, who announced the building of a nuclear plant in Jefferson County Monday, predicted here today that selection of a site for a similar plant at the Town of Rudolph in Wood County, Town of Haven in Sheboygan County or Town of Glen Haven in Grant County would be made not later than Spring, 1975.

Paul Ziemer, president of Wisconsin Public Service Corporation, told a group of Wood and Portage County leaders that the morning meeting was not a consolation breakfast. "Those of you who have been actively trying to bring a new source of energy to Central Wisconsin should not give up," he advised.

Ziemer complimented the Wood / Portage County labor, business and university leadership who recently organized a group directed toward

" rational, scholarly dialogue about Wisconsin's future energy needs and the best ways to meet those needs.

"Your group may well be a prototype for concerned citizen groups everywhere interested in factual, unemotional discussions about nuclear energy, rather than permitting the dialogue to reduce itself to shouting, superstition and fear," Ziemer added.

"We have asked you here to discuss our present plans and to keep you informed of our future plans," he continued.

Q\gI oi6

-,

,-

.

,

, o .

Wisconsin Electric Power Company Add 1 Sol Burstein, exequtive vice president of Wisconsin Electric Power Company, which is acting as agent for the four utilities, said that the Jefferson County site gave the best chance of getting the first unit into operation in time for the summer of 1981.

Or the sites evaluated, Jefferson is closest to the highly populated and industrialized southeastern and south central parts of the State, he added.

Buratein explained, however, that only two 900 megawatt units will be placed ct Jefferson. The des'.gn there is conceived as a standardized two-unit plant. "The same design can be located on any of the sites we have been' studying," he said. This standard design has been filed with the Atomic Energy Commission for construction permits. Tile application can cover the same design built at any of the other locations.

"We will have to decide -- and not later than next spring -- where we will locate the next nuclear plant. That plant is scheduled for operation in 1984-1985," Burstein said.

He noted that one of the advantages of the site in the Town of Rudolph is the underlying rock formations which provide the best nuclear plant foundation. "In analyzing the several hundred borings, however, we discovered a discontinuity in the rock which required further study.

We had to know precisely what was there," he explained.

Burstein said that three different teams of geologists examined the site independently. The geologists report no movement of the rock structure within the past several hundred thousand years. The report o/6 020

. .

. .

,- Wisconsin Electric Power Company Add 2 states that there probably has been no movement since the rock was formed originally more than 200 million years ago.

" Testing, analyzing and cataloging of core samples will require another three months. A delay we could not accept in our need to get power to people by 1981. The Jefferson site permits us to file our environmental impact statement three months earlier," he added.

Burstein stated that the proximity to the industrialized southeast part of the state would be less of a factor when the second plant site

.

is selected.

He said that out of the 80 sites originally considered for nuclear development, five received an intensive two-year study. The five are Town of Rudolph, Wood County; Town of Haven, Sheboygan County; Town of Gler Haven, Grant County; Town of Paris, Kenosha County; Town of Kcshkonong, Jefferson County.

The site in the Town of Paris was effectively ruled out when Wisconsin Electric announced last week that a coal-burning plant would be built nearby. Also last week, three of the four public utilities announced that they were considering the site in Grant County for a coal-burning plant.

"That leaves Haven in Sheboygan County and Rudolph in Wood County as the prime sites for the next nuclear plant," Burstein said.

The Haven site is ideally situated on Lake Michigan. He said it would be less expensive to build there if 1ake water could be used for cooling. The cost of cooling towers could be saved. " Lake water cooling c76 02i

. .

.

'

Wisconsin Electric Power Company Add 3 would also result in a more efficient plant," he added.

"But criteria on the use of Lake Michigan water for cooling are still indefinite. "We can't design a plant when we don't know the rules," he said.

Burstein added that the Haven site would also require more excavation than the one at Rudolph, possibly adding a year to the construction schedule.

He said that work on environmental impact statements is underway for both the Haven and Rudolph sites. He expects the environmental study to be completed by about October of this year.

.

- h9

'- b o!6

. .

.

.

'

.

Possible Remarks - Tom Fogarty, SAFE Chairman, January 9, 1975 before the AFL-CIO Central Labor Council Open. .ntroduce yourself - with the union identification and as SAFE Chairman Introduce - Terry Norris, Monica, Hal Holtz, Max Andre, Ken Willett, Leo Wergin, Rita Bemke, Bill Cownie and John Koutre. These are the Executive Committee of SAFE - a group representing Industry, Business, Chamber of Commerce, Industri al Development, UW - Stevens Point 'in Wooc and Portage Counties.

WHY SAFE? Secure Adequate Future Energy was formed.in self defense. The Wisconsin utilities had indicated they might build a large nuclear energy power plant at Rudolph, Wisconsin. Anti-energy forces in Central Wisconsin had organized an intensive campaign against the plant, in fact against any new energy plants. We were aware of the planned industrial growth of Central Wisccasin's major industries, and that the energy supply would have to be enlarged to facilitate that growth.

The anti-energy forces, led by emotional environ-mentalists at UW-Stevens Point, had created the local attitude that everyone was against any building of energy plants. Their arguments were short on facts, long on emotion. Especially fear tactics were being used to frighten local people. They were

,,

. ') $

-

. .

~

, *

-

-

-

being told many untruths, one of which was that a nuclear plant would kill people in the area.

We believed another force for sanity and reason was needed. Labor took the leadership to create SAFE to do just that.

SAFE'S ACTIVITIES

- Over 100 at first organizational meeting in Wisconsin Rapids in June.

- The Town of Rudolph Door-to-Door Survey in July

• Report.

- The Town Hall Meeting in Rudolph with experts addressing themselves to the Survey questions - 175 attending.

- Dick Fairbanks from Mel Laird's Energy Task Force.

- Dr. Long - Ur.iversity of New Mexico

- John McLean, the utilities

- Other Activities - Lobbying County Boards; Speakers at clubs, Labor resolutions.

WHERE Ff ."tRE : We have come to realize the battle is not whether or not an energy plant is built in Rduolph - or Koshkonong - or anyplace else. The issue is really jobs in Wisconsin and this ; tate's continued economic development.

An energy crisis exists today - right now - in Wi.sconsin because the energy plants we need in the early 1980's must be started building now.

And, the anti-energy forces statewide have de-clared war - a war they are winning - to prevent O 'l 6 02b

. .

. . .- .

, -

i s those plants being built.

And, that's why we've asked to speak with you.

Wisconsin is at an economic crossrcads. Dr.

Terry Norris will tell you something about it.

cc: Terry Norris Monica Bainter

.

e

.

a

. .

For More Information: '.'

Dr. Terry Norris O  % 'dh Port Edwards, WI d, Md k'

'

887-5222 SECURE ADEQUATE NEWS RELEASE ENERGY For release Tuesday, July 8, 1975 P. O. Box 602

• Wisconsin Rapids, Wisconsin 54494 eaigin em.

Richard Darling, a state International Brother-Chairman hood of Electrical Workers union official, will speak Tom Fogarty, 4234760

.  %"m Rapids at the Wednesday, July 9 meeting of SAFE (Secure gr;c, %

Adequate Future Energy). Max Andrae, 423-1574 w.mnsia aspids Darling, who is the essistant _.usiness manager of **

Bill Cownie, 423-1830 Wisc nda Rapids LU 2150-IBEW in Milwaukee and a member of the IBEW's Treasurer Power Plant Committee, will appear at the public Rita Bemke, 457-2402 Junction City gathering in the Wisconsin Rapids Labor Temple Portage County Coordina:or Hal Holtz -

at 7:30 P.M. Stenns Point Wood County Coordinator He will be discussing the statewide possibility Bill Mengel Wisconsin Rapids of a coope'rative effort between the Wisconsin Energy Ar-Large Executive Committee Coalition (WEC) and SAFE. Ken Willett Dr. Monica Bainter WECwasrecentlyformedinMilwaukeebyrepresentativeshf*]

'

labor, business and education. 'Iheir stated purpose is to exYl$rN"further the relationships between jobs and energy and to work to insure an '

adequate supply of electrical energy in the 1980's.

Darling is a member of WEC.

Tom Fogarty, SAFE Chairman, said Wednesday's public meeting will also iaclude discussion of his group's present financial status and the organization's plans for the remainder of 1975.

-'

D2,b n/C' -

. . -

. .. .. .-. . . . - . - . . - - . . . . - - . - . . . - - . . . . , . . .  :--

. .

.

-

.. , . . .

., , .,- -

. . .

-

~

A SECURE ADEQUATE FUTURE NEWS RELEASE Por More Information: ENERGY

,

_ k. dbx 602

• Wisconsin Rapids, Wir:.tsin 54494

• eggiis cio.

Wisconsin Rapids.:. Secure Adequate Future Energy -

(SAFE) will meet at the Wisconsin Rapids Labor [, . Tom %rty, 4m760 - ,

Wisconsin Rapids ,.

-

Temple July 9 so that officers of the group can. Vice Chainnan

Max Andrae, 423-1574 present a plan for SAFE to become a c$ apter.of Wuc nsin Ragnds

,,p. -

-"

,,

Secretary the newly formed Wisconsin Energy Coalition.

-

Bill Cownie, 423-1830

.

Wuconna Rapids , , , , , .

Treasurer According .to Dr. Telry Norris, Port Edward.s, SAFE *',was , Rita Bemke,4572E2

.

~

Junctico Cry one of. tiie.ldrivincy fbrces whi6h ' initiated ~ th.r st atewid@ortage County Coordin, energy coalition whose purpose _is the same as ours, Hal Holtz .

'

Stevens Point

• that is to insure an adequate supply of electrical . -

Wood County Coordsnator

~

' * ' ' Bill Mengel energy to light our homes and run our factories in . . Wuconsin Rapids .

At Large Executive Cunn.ttee the 1980's" .

Ken Willert '

,

.

,

Dr. Monica Bainter .

Dr. Terry Norris C Formation of,the Wisconsin Energy Coalition was Lloyd Mitchell

~

Leo Wergin e announced last week at a meeting held at the Marquette

. .

University College of Engineering. Dr. Norris and several representatives of Wisconsin labor and business attended.

-

.

John Schmitt, President, Wisconsin AFL-CIO, was elected, President, -

with Paul E.

Hassett, President, Wisconsin Manufacturers' Association, Secretary.

Dr. Monica' Bainter, a UW-Stevens Point Physics professor and a member of SAFE's executive committee since the group's formation last summer, will serve as second vice president of the

~

Wisconsin Energy Coalition. ,/b (0

'" h

.' *

..  : . . - .

"This winter SAFE was invited by both the AFL-CIO and the Wisconsin Manuracturers' Association to explain how labor, business and university forces in CentraA Wisconsin.had joined to present counter arguments to the anti-business growth forces."

Dr. Norris said.

The result of these sessions was the " Statewide SAFE" announced laat werk which the local organization will now work with in developing an action program, according to Norris.

,

';2he SAFE executive committee met this week at the Mead Inn here to hear Dr. Norris's report. In approving the move to unify with the statewide energy group the SAFE group ndopted a statement of purlase which stated, in part:

"The issue is no longer whether Rudolph or Koshkonong or any other state areas will see new atomic or coal fired energy plants built.

"The real issue now is future jobs in Wiscosnin and whether anti business-labor growth forces will be permitted through legis'ation and public opinion. pressures to plateau the state's economic growth. This would do great harm to our university and vocaticnal school systems, to our state environmental protection programs and to all the other state services pcwered by the taxes that economic growth generatas."

.

Tom Fogarty, Wisconsin Rapids, SAFE's Chairman, said that the imm)diate goal will be " defeat of the five-year nuclear moratorium bill now before the legislature and three other pieces of legislation which, if passed, will practically prohibit building new electrical energy plants in the state."

[2

- *

,.

,

"To be in operation by the early '80's a coal or atomic plant must be under construction now," Fogarty said. "Any more delay for these plants now can only result in a desperate energy shortage then, a signal to Wisconsin industry that it should pian plant expansion elsewhere."

The July 9 SAFE meeting is planned for 7:30 P.M. The public is invited to attend, Fogarty said.

.

LAND. J# ROUTE 1, August 28, 1979 RUDOLPH, WISCONSIN 54475

-

'

.

1:ichael IIathanson Divisien of Jnvironmental Inpact Studies

.e;onne :!ational I.aboratory 9700 South Cass Avenue Argonne, Illinois 60l+39

Dear I:

1chael IIsthansen, As requested in your letter to us of 7/23/79, 2:!D, Inc. ,

has uritten a state.nent of their objecticns to a nuclecr pc'.rer plant for .ludolph.

These are by no means our complete objactions.

' Iou mi;ht wish to refer to the 1,0C0 pages of newspaper clippings 'thich IA:'D sent to the IT3C via re;istered nail.

Those clip,,in;s covared the aucolph nuclear controversy.

Sincerely, .

• r

-

, -

,- ,. , , , . .-

.vf ,' n

.

/ J : c, , ,, A ' m, 6

(Mrs.) I!acci Jacoccen Co-Chairman u Director Id3, Inc.

.-

..a u 2n0 1 O

D D Je o .R o p qa '( , r CJ - - -.3 "To question and learn - that we may preserve and protect. "

@ -e

'i 3 Qjg 6

n

.

..-

.

A RESPONSS TO ARGONH3 HATIONAL LAB 03ATORY OUTLINIUG LAUD'S OB-J3CTICUS TO HAVING A liUCLIAR PLaHT CONSTRUCTED AUD 02 OP3RATIUG Ii! TH3 RUDOLPH AR3A 0 C7 C' O Uritten by: Naomi F. Jacobson d es ~u 11 Dated: August 20, 1979 c'

[El l 3r

-

.9d ]b _ IU _a LAUD, L3AGU3 AGAI:IST UUCL3AR DANGERS, IUC., is concerned about low-level ionising radiation. It can affect humans, animals, plants and the whole living cycle.

1945 and the testing of atomic bombs.and dropping of bombs en Hiroshima and Nagasaki began a period of vast amounts of canmade radiation being released to the environment with uhich life had no previous contact. The process of radio-activity seeping and creeping into the food chains and the air we breathe began.

There is no safe level of radioactivity. A cell killed by radiation will ba discarded, but a cell vounded can go on to cause cancer, leukemia, life shortoning and make us more

,

susceptible to diseases, and genetic damage."

We have been assured by governmental bodies at t others promotin; nuclear power that we shculd not norry i 2r the little amounts of radioactivity. Assurances were also given to natives who lived on Rongelap and Utirik atolls in 1954 cnd nou some k0 islanders have undergone surgery for cancer-and potentially cancerous nodules. Bikini Islanders were told 9 years ago that Bikini was safe for reoccupation, and within 6 years they began to show higher than normal amounts of strontium, cesin and plutonium in their bodies from food grown in contaminated soil -- so the natives vare again moved off in 1978. "The government's cover-up and the government's ability to control expert vitnesses prohibited us from establish-ing that radioactivity uns the cause of the deaths" said 9b

. .

Page 2 - Argonne attorney Dan S. Bushnell who is representing sheep ranchers who lost 4200 sheep in 1953 The atom bombs that struck Hiroshima and Nagasaki are taking a toll among US servicemen who helped clean up the destroyed cities, but the VA maintains that GIs stationed there received " negligible" radiation. Federal health officials had evidence as early as 1965 that excessive leukemia deaths were occurring among Utah residents exposed to radioactive fallout from US atomic bomb tests. A public health official has charged that an atomic bomb factory, Rocky Flats, has caused 500 cases of cancer in the Denver metropolitan area by polluting the air and soil with deadly radioactive plutonium.

Workers at the government's nuclear facilities in Hanford, Wash-ington died of cancer at a rate 5% greater than the general population even when receiving doses that are considered safe by the government. The Defense Depa"tment may be missing thousands of people -- perhaps deliberately -- it its purported effort to locate ex-service personnel who may have receCived b d cancer-inducing doses of radiation during atmospheric aton .

9 E~D bomb tests betueen 1946 and 1952. i >Y Several decades ago X-ray was considered good for the -

G )

thymus gland, lymph nodes, sinus trouble, tonsil and adenoid N c--

enlargementandskinproblems,nowifyoususpectyouhadsuch treatments,youaresupposaitoreportittoyourdoctorandhve your thyroid c:mmined. You should be checked every 2 years 10 thereafter. The public has every reason to be concerned about radioactivity looking at these mistakes.

The more radioactivity you are exposed to in your lifetime whether from background 3 X-rays, airplano flights, TV sets, releases from nuclear facilities or fallout from bomb testing, the greater is your chance of developing a health related problem n~ ( O?L

. ..

Page 3 - Argonne as you age or passing a genetic defect on to your children.

Radioactivity is present in our milk, and thus other foods, continually in Uisconsin since the State Health Department started keeping records of it in 1963 Reactors and other nuclear facilities routinely give off low levels of radiation, and they also have accidental releases.

At Three Mile Island for 30 days during the fall of 1979 there will be planned releases.

Radioactivit'/ can reconcentrate in the food chain. In some cases the radioactive s.aterials are similar to natural materials a body needs, and the body cannot teil the difference. Radioactive strontiin 90 is similar to ct.lcium, radioactive cesiun 137 is similar to potassium and radioactive iodine 131 is like regular iodine. If the body needs calcium anr* radioactive strontiun 90 is present, it can absorb the strontiun 90 and build it into the bones or teeth.

The LM D/LIAF. 3esearch Team has found during the period 1963-1976 that the growing child abscrbed about tuice as much radioactivity as an adult in Wisconsin from their diet.

Citizens in the north, nest and central parts of the State re-ceived considerably more radioactivity than their counterpart y (q 'M

'

11 in the south and southeastern part of the State. 3 Cancer deaths in Uisconsin seem to correlate with the OM areas of highest radioactivity in their food. The nore rura 5 areas of '.liscensin have the highast cancer death rates for the (v) nost part, not the industrialised areas of the south, scutheast

"

and east as one might expect.lo Monitoring of radioactivity by the utilities thenselves is not acceptable to anti-nuclear ;roups. The State of Wisconsin's ..

~

[9 ! O

. .

Page 4 - Argonne nonitoring is under serious questioning in a June 1979 study called, How Radioactive is Our 1411k? by Another Mother Fund for Peace in California.

Releases at Three Mile Island vent over the 1,000 ren per hour capability of their nonitors. They really don't know what got away those first days. All 8 nonitors in the vent stack uhere 8;j of.the radiation escaped, went off scale.1 In addition, radiation data at TMI was analyzed by a private conpany founded by 8 private electric utility companies including General Public Utilities the holding company that ovns THI. That appears to be a very real conflict of interest.

Fines the utilities are assessed for violations are so snall it pays a utility to operate instead,of shutting doun. Buying nakup electricity can cost 'j250,000 to $700,000 a day. Replace-d

__

nent power for both TMI units is presently about 322 nillion]a each month. Edison run plants in Illinois have racked up G'/- D nore violations of 180 regulation than any other nuclear b@ c facilities in the country.17 In December 1974 3dison's Dresden d" plant accidentally released 1130 gallens of nildly radioactive

"

vater into the Illinois River. In May 1976, an Edison super-visor suffered radiation overenposure when he entered a highly radioactive area in violation of regulations -- the fine, 313,000.

Eight violations, including poor security in such areas as fences gates where intruders could gain access to the plant cost then J25,500. A total of $103,300 in fines have been leviM against

.:ldison plants in the past four years for probleas relating to safety and security.17 An energency core cooling systen that seems poorly under-stood after the experience at THI.

Hydrogenexplosions:aightlg () '

. .

.

Page 5 - Argonne

,

occur.

Transportation of waste is coning under more and more ,

19  :

18 and Charleston, SO have barred criticism. New York City ,

waste transport through their streets. 25 other states have j

- some restrictions. The Townships of Rudolph and Sigel in l

'

central Wisconsin have restrictions on waste transportation.

21 There have been numerous spills and defective casks.22 The  :

'

-

transportation step is considered the most vulnerable by the government.23 Some railroads have balked at hauling spent ,  :

fuel and. have insisted on special trains which would bring the cost of shipping way up. Sandia Laboratories estimates that .

a major release of spent fuel or high level waste in Hav York f City would clais 4,000 lives and cost 32 billion in cleanup 21

' and damages. Dr. Leonard Solon of the NYCity Health Dept. l calculates that only a 1lI release from a major high-level ship-21 ment might cause 10,000 carly deaths and 200,000 cancers. d In Wisconsin a driver of a truck carrying a radioactive shipnent M

on interstate 90-94 uns found to have beer in a cooler in his v Q r- - ,

cab. Just who is responsible for costs in case of a major

-

bb radioactive release in a transportation accident? 4 ar-m-,

8 Insufficient insurance portection is limited to $560 million C3 when the government's own studies say there could be $17 to

$280 billion in damage from a major accident with 45,000 deaths and 100,000 injuries and long-term contamination.of an area the sine of Pennsylv; 11a.25 The A3C kept this 1965 update of an earlier study secret for 8 years until it was forced to be made public by a Freedom of Information lawsuit.25 At TMI, 31.2 million has been paid out for emergency living expenses and lost wages, houover,12 lawsuits have been filsd ea.ch for J560 q]( Ob-

^

Page 6 - Argonne

'

million. Uhen the 0560 million level uas set in 1957, reactors were much smaller and in addition, inflation has riddled the dollar value since then. There is no homeowner's insurance, and tax codes do not cover nuclear accident losses. Are residents who flee their homes entitled to tax benefits, such as itemized deductions for ' additional living expenses incurred in the evacuation? If these residents are reliaoursed, does that constitute taxable income? Will residents be entitled to casualty loss deductions for any radiation damage to their 28 personal and real property? Can they deduct the losses, if any, in the mar!cet value cf their homes.?

Before Price-Anderson insurance doe: arNy: thn TIuclear Regulatory Commission must determine that an Extraordinary Nuclear Occurrence has happened. The Commission's authority to determine unether or not an ENO has occurred is not revleuable by the courts.

An EHO, means any event causing a discharge or dispersal of source, special nuclear, or byproduct material from its intended place of confinement in amounts offsite, or causing radiation levels offsite, g which the Commission determines to be substanticl, and the Com-rza

'

Q mission determines has resulted or probably will result in "N substantial damages to persons offsite or property offsi Reactors are not allowed to be built in heavily populated %L_, -

'-r'g;p

areas. Why should lou population areas be subjected to lia-b 9 bility limits, possible property devaluation, health effects, a 20-year statuate of limitation for latent health effects (al-though if a state has a 30-year statuate of limitation, it would allow that limit in that state )? If the industry is so safe as nuclear proponents claim, there should be no need for this insurance limitation. ()3 g g

. .

Page 7 - Argonne i

Sabotage, terrorism and blacicaail vill be used as explanation  !

I for curtailments of individual freedoms 2nd especially so if we move into a plutonium economy. F3I agents at El Pasco arrested 2 men in connection with the theft of 5,000# of uranium ore valued at about G200,000. According to the FBI it was the second such con iscation in three months. A federal inspector vas able to slip through security and enter the Nine Mile Point nucleir plant's administration building before he vas stopped.30 Tuo former security guards uho fd.cified reports at the Uisconsin Genoa nuclear plant were sentenced to 20 days in jail. A Princeton student and a reporter for the Progressive Magazine vere able to design or produce accurate information about

-

building atomic bombs.32 Two workers have admitted to pou ing sodium hydroxide onto fuel rods to dramatize a lack of security and quality control at the Surry reactor in Virginia.33 2 rigt of capital costs for security at a reprocessing facility in-cludos, 3 different fences, micrrrave instrusion system. infra-rad -

intrusion system, fence alarm system, renote gates, vehicle barrier, outside lighting, gridding of culverts, anti-helicopter i 9 I cable touer and ca' ole systam, guardhouses , metal de tec t.or, p  ;

cnplosived M F, X-ray units, photo-badge unit, patrol and O ,M ,

!

response vehicles, special transfer vehiclas, TV units and Mb nonitors, pistols, autoaatic rifles, automatic shotguns, tearb {' g'

as guns, bullet proof vests, riot helcets, tear ,;as masks, (- Q ualkie talk 123, etc.34 Does this sound like a p2aceful uorld?

A governmant panel's repurt recommended legislation that vould parait i>olice disruption of the activities of .:usp?cted

rou ps , datention of citizens without arrest, and forcible searches uithout varrants.3'# Nuclear po'<!er promotes this typ6 \,L-bi Js j cf thinking. tf j g

. .

Page 8 - Argonne Costs of extra police pr^t etion, con i useage, population influx and thus scaool and s_ i service load are not covered suf-ficiently

/by the return in tax,.s to the counship and caunty. In the case of a najor accident these expenses coald be extraordinarily high.

The older reactors get and the larger they are, the vorse their performance. Originally the nuclear industry predicted capacity factors of 80%, but in a report called Unclear Power Growth 1974-2000, tha idC capacity fac cor workcl out to 65 2%

over the 30-year life of a plant. Cecey reported that older nuclear plants continued to record lover capacity factors:

their 1975 average was 39 25 and uas identical to their 1973-1974 average. The cumnulativo to December 1975 uas better for the 400-499 negavatt range at 65 15, but only 44.5% for the 1,000 ICI plus range. In case you think lir.

Cosey was prejudiced, the Federal Energy Administration reported capacity factors of 61% in 1973, 55 0$ in 1974, 57 0$ in 1975 and 57 4% in 1976.37 In 1977, 6 utilities were accused of f5'M

&'

N altering fi;ures on nuclear capacity so that they vould come bd i i up uith a better performance.38 @" @f? -

If the plants do not run right, ratepayers gick up the k @'cj_

tab for buying takeup electricity. It also takes more reserve b 9 capacity to insure enough pouer uhen reactors are doun.

Wisconsin's Keuaunee and Point Beach reactors started up in 1970, 1972 and 1974 and are about 500 1nts. They are not very old, they are smaller, and they were built uhen costs were cuch smaller. ' Iou are not talking the same costs for those reactors and todays.

(17 6-

,

0

. .

Page 9 - Argonne Electricity from nuclear pouer plan'.s uas supposal to be so cheap you wouldn't have to meter it. 9 7n 1967 the A3C ,

talked of capital costs of $134 per kilouatt for plants on '

line in 1973.39 Actual costs were 50 to 2805 greater.30

'

In ,

1974 they talke- in terms of $700 per kilowatt for plants on line f in the early 1980's.39 Haven's last estimate was 31.65 billion 0

for 1800MWs or 0916 a kilowatt. Arizona PS suspended construction of 2 reactors with estimated costs of 31102 per kilowatt. Cementon ,

in Neu York was cancelled as the cost went up to $2583 per kilowatt.42 l The Uashington State Senate Energy and Utilities Committee pre-I dicts that residents of Vancouver, Washinton will see their l

'

4 annual electric bills jump from 3339 to 51479 by 1990. 3 The l

reason, the escalation expense in building 5 new nuclear plants I originally priced at $4 billion and now projected to cost up to 43 S15 billion.

Only 2 units vere sold in the domestic market during 1978 and nuclear commitments have shrunk from 211 units in 1977 to 195 in 1979 3ven in this 195, there is a large number of postponements and delays ran;ing from one year to as long as R Q six years, uith an increase from 7 to 11 in the indefinite g vt column.44 g]

Rumor has it that Babcock & Uilcox is phasing cut their b a

';

45 and General Electric may also be re-nuclear reactor plant Q

arranging their management to do likewise.45 The Atomic Industrial Forum reports that the Bank of America expects to resume making loans to help finance con-struction of nuclear pouer facilities unless the review by the President's panel on TIII exposes insurmountable problems.

4 Their moratorium began in May of 1979,7 and one must remember the revieu of the special panel is still pending.

F7 6 039

. .

Page lo - Argonne

.

Charles Kananoff prepared a study for New Jersey's Public 48 Advocate Office. He studied coal and nuclear plant costs from 48 1972 through 1977 During the 5-year period, controlling for infV tion, the cost of nuclear plants went up 16% and coal 8% a ,

l year, and that included the cost of scrubbers.48 He said the I typical nuclear plant today costs $1050 per kilowatt, while the typical coal plant cost is $675 per kilowatt or about a $$$

difference.4"" He estimates the typical nuclear plants finished after 1985 will cost J2,000 per kilowatt, compared with 31,000 48 per kilowatt for a typical ccal plant -- or a 100% difference.

Utilities have rates based on the amount of equity capital invested, and with nuclear plants much costlier than coal plants  ;

their rate base is much greater and they can nake a larger profit.

A study done by 3 argent & Lundy for Uisconsin Pouer & Light d

M ~ rQdl found in comparing costs of 3 - 600 Ir.I coal-fired plants to 2 - 900 MU nuclear ones, that the average annual cost vould be less for coal plants. 49 0 wN Bond costs have risen for utilities heavily invested in m (EL,G2

'~

-

nuclear as nervous underwriters charged Vepco about 50% above the usual fee or 33 6 million over the expected 13-year average C' i, l

life of the bonds.50  :

i Utilities are by far the most capital-intensive industry in the country. From 1971 to 1976 they used 15% of all capital funds raised by all business or about $17 billion a year. This figure is projected to double to 334 billion a year by 1986. N Connonwealth 3dison of Illinois says it faces its vorst fi-nancial crisis in 41 years. 3dison is applying for its lar;est rate increase ever -- 18 35,to help pay off debts nostly incurred 52 by the huge construction program.

"/6 040

. .

Page 11 - Argonne Electric pouer capacity reserve cargins nationuide have been quite high for the past three years -- in the range of 30v.53 Rate structures, historically, encouraged the use of electricity vith a "the more you use, the less you pay" hasis. But that concept may be on the way out which should canserve electricity and save the ratepayers the cost of building generating capacity. In UP&U s rate request it may I

be decided to flatten out the rate structure inasmuch as the

!

PSC finds that declining block rates are no longer justified  ;

\

in electricity pricing.'q Home heating by electricity may not be encouraged through elimination of the special rates for I that service except for the 2464 customers presently served. b Electrical home heating was one of the reasons the utilities projected high grcuth to justify new plants. Even at 31.00 a gallon, fuel oil would be cheaper to use than electricity l to heat a house. Propane and natural gas are the cheapest if fuel oil rises to $1 a gallon.

d in central Uisconsin,/ Electrical heating is a terrible use of p a finite energy source uhen to raise the temperature a few @[' '

degrees in a home, we use an energy source of thousands of bb! cra ,

56 D degrees at a power plant losing cost of the heat up the coolinr(D g

_

towers and a great deal in transmission alto. Q Saunders Miller, a mergers and acquistions specialist with Dain, Kalman & 'guail, Inc. in Minneapolis said, "..froc an  !

I econcric standpoint alone, to rely upon nuclear fission as the  ;

primary source of our s La tionary energy supplies will cunu bilute economic lunacy on a scale unparalleled in recorded history, and nany lead to the economic '.iaterloo of the United States."5"#

n / t, 041

.

.

. ,

Page 12 - Argonne The Wall Street Journal reported on August 7,1979 that the ICC Commissionars know almost nothing about the contents of the documents describing the construction flaws, safety problems and accident records of America's 72 nuclear power plants.E0 l Public Service of Indiana halted some concrete pouring at I

its Marble Hill nuclear plant as a hole 20 feet long was discovered in work done on one of the auxiliary 'ouildings.

31ectrical World magasine said ~the void was 9'x20'xl' .

The URC itself found 500 repairs of voids in the concrete pouring.

A pipefitter posed as an engineer during construction of the Prairie Island nuclear plant in Minnesota.61 He falsified his credentials when he was hired as a mechanical engineer with 61 experience in directing power plant construction. Gilbert Associates paid Florida Power 33 6 million due to a structural defect in the concrete done of the reactor building. Major g contractors may handle the entire construction project and their commitment is limited to profit maximization and to

'W g"-

>k

--J 9

' '

6 quality applications in the short run. 3 They have little Q g' interest, fiscal or professional, in the long-run quality, b LO '

6 safety and deliverability of the plants they construct. 3 b 9 Thera isn't a single reprocessing plant open in the U.S.

~lest Valley in New York has been turned over to the State by Nuclear Fuel Services with a Cl+ million fund for taking care of the waste when present cstimates have a cost of 3632 million At Morris, Illinois the attorney general is trying to halt dumping and not allau e::pansion of fuel storage capacity from 750 metric tcns to 1850 metric tons. At I3arnwell in South

"/6 042

. .

Page 13 - Argonne Carolina at the edge of the 200,000 acre preserve of the A30's 3avannah River Plant,66 is a yet unopened facility that hopes to get federal funding each year to keep it alive. Reprocessing plants would release more radioactivity to the air than most other nuclear facilities.

The costs of temporary storage of spent fuel have increased from 31200 per assembly per year at ' dest Valley to $4000 per assembly per year at the Horris operation and estimates of 320,000 per assembly per year have been made if expansion of the Morris spent fuel storage capability is permitted.

A typical reactor core consists of about 200 fuel assemblies 68 totaling 50,000 fuel rods. After the first several years of operating, about 1/3 of these are pulled annually. About 32 metric tons of spent fuel are removed' each year from a reec tor during refueling. The costs of cleanup of '.lest Valley could run to 31 million a ton as 64 tons of spent fuel vere reprocessed altogether. At this rate, it could cost J32 million dollars c J]

yearly to reprocess spent fuel from one reactor.

In 1977 the President issued an order that stopped re- u .- r -_3 processing in the U.S. temporarily because of a concern of @) Q ueapons proliferation from reprocessed plutonium. A 1000 El b ,ad reactor makes about 500 pounds of plutonium each year and it y% .=

only takes betueen % to 15y's of it to make a bomb.

The Dept. of Snergy submitted legislation to Congress to construct or acquire facilities for the temporary storage of spent fuel in February 1979 This is called Avay From 3eactor Storage. Discussion of Waste storagc in .iisconsin 6

has included '.lauchara,*.laupaca and Shauano counties,9 but a study on alternative nuclear plant sites discussed "For . - ,

, ,, v h

.

Page 14 - Argonne some other use" as being a use for these sites. "For some other use" coversa lot of things and AFRS could be one use or underground storage of high-level vaste another.

Within the next 25 years,

/ Lou-level uastes could take enough area to cover a 4-lane highuay.a foot deep from coast to coast.71 West Valley in NY,71 73 Maxey Flats in Kentucky,72 and Sheffield in Illinois are all closed and have contamination problems offsite. In total there is 50 million cubic feet or ra'ioactive tools, clothing and vorn out machinery now stored at the six lou-level dump sites (3 of uhich are closed). At Beatty, Nevada, uorkers stole radioactive tools out of a dump site and more Iecently a trrekoad of vaste caught on fire at Beatty and another uas leaking radioactrity as the vaste was improperly packaged in both cases. The governors of the States of Washington, Nevada and South Carolina LS N Q^

'

uarned that they vould close their vaste dumps unless the situation i groves and a " grave peril" to public health was S ,

eliminated. Evidence of more radioactivity seaping and  %' '

M'

^

creeping into our environment.

d Hith-level vaste is presently stored in spent fuel rods at the reactor sites naking each reactor site in that case, a high-level uaste storage area. The government has been considering a 3 -square mile site, on 2 levels near Carlsbad, Neu Mexico.

Houever, the military and civilian sections of government are at odds because the military doesn't vant the 1,000 spent fuel rods put in this site for a trial experiment. Therefore, some of the funding is in jeopardy.

Although the volumes of the military vastes are very large, they are on the average almost _00 times more dilute than projected commarcial high-level vaste. In l?76 there uas curies) of strontium 90 in inventory at Hanford, 07[3 (j k 4 270 (10

. .

j j

Page 15 - Argonne i

i Savannah River, and Idaho Hational Testing Station.77 liilitary  ;

'

wastes contain 3 5 curies of strontium 90 per gallon and 300 curies  ;

per gallon are projected for commercial fuel fresh liquid stastes. 7  :

The amount of uater necessary to dilute one curie of strontium 90 l to drinking water purity --about 10 billion gallons,of water.78 U

The temperature in a repository could be higher than 200 C during the first few hundred years. Iaboratory expericents on the effects of radiation on proposed ceramic waste have not yet been done, although the government is now looking at this inas-auch cs glass, that was once courted as the uay to bury high-level wastes in salt, is under criticism as it was fo1md with the heat present and salt, it uas only a matter of two veeks before the sample broke into fragments.79

" Glass is not stable," said Stanford University's Dr. Uilliam Luth, a geo-chemist and one of at least 10 scientists who have told the Dept. of 2nergy to alter or abandon the glass approach to ic- r-- di mobilizing radioactive waste. " Glass is soluble and it's q leachable--it's uhat you would do if you uanted to caximize 80 q" "  !

activity in the geologic environment," Luth said. @Q r, New findings are also being reported on the use of salt 80 ?m S mines as repositories for radioactive waste. The findings p j show that radioactive vaste containers would heat salt, the salt would then expand and move upuard around the containers and eventually the containhrs vould plumnet through the salt "like lead into water," and no longer be protected.

Fresh studies have also found that salt invariably contains tiny traces of unter that combine with impurities like calcium and magnesium chloride in the salt to form a corrosive liquid that cats through stainless steel in a matter of veeks. O "76 045

4

. .

Page 16 - Argor.ae i Dr. David Stewart of the U.S. Geological Survey, whichis in direct conflict with the Energy Department over the use of salt repositories for nuclear waste has said, " Salt is not dry and it's not okay."

In any event, it would be at least 1988 to 1995 before 81 any burial of high-level vaste could take place.

Although the government originally promised to allow states a veto of nuclear waste sites, that option seems to have been taken away. 2Ven in New Mexico where many people are on the government payroll and cay be afraid to speak out because o' their jobs, there is a movenent opposing nuclear waste storage.

President Carter talks of importing nuclear vaste 83 and Governor Dreyfus says '.!isconsin cust consider taking it if

-

8%

'Jisconsin is geologically able to do so.

Things are becoming so desperate the U.S. is considering M

buying an island in the Pacific for its atonic waste.85 ,

Uisconsin is a najor dairy state, and in addition, IM p 8_ '

raises truck farm vegetables, cranberries, etc. This

5) $.

State should not be considered for storage of nuclear vaste. c

'q 3ecause domestic reactor orders have been practically '

86 6"9 nil, manufacturers try to sell them abroad. Every nation buying a reactor can secure the materials to make nuclear weapons as India did in 1974. Previous to that time, citizens were told this could not be done. Nuclear weapons and nuclear pouer plants are siamese tuins.

The ExporL-Impori, Jank of the U.S. is a taxpayer-supported agency and has backed a total of 47 foregin nuclear plants, 18 of these in less developed countries.80 The present 36!+4 million loan and guarantee pac' cage for the Philippine reactor o f f, 000

~

. .

l Page 17 - Argonne 86 is the 3:: port-Import Bank's largest. project ever. At the time the new reactor loan vas set into motion, three of Exim's 9-member advisory committee vere actively involved with the nuclear industry: Stephen D. Bechtel, Sr. , was head of Bechtel Corp.,

which built the world's first commercial nuclear reactor and many others since; Victor S. Rockhill uas executive vice presi-dent of Chase Manhattan, a major bank for Vestinghouse, which landed the Philippine contract; and Valker L. Cisler, head of the board of Detroit 3dison and first president of the Atomic Industrial Forum.

Vested interests protect their money in the nuclear industry. Uall Street Journal reported on 1/19/78 that 21 large institutional investors hold significant voting strength in 122 of the Nation's larp & ,:capanies. 'lhen persons defend

,

nuclear pouer, check to see if they have a vested interest in g it, such es, ownership of stock in Uestin3 house,

.ad %

G3 or ,

utilities. Or chec2 to see if they ever received grants, .;~Jg ( 3 consultant fees, etc. from some company involved uith the K-g (29 /

nuclear industry. k fa cd

'

-

a Although uranium supplies have cased somewhat due to the '

.

clowdown in reactor orders, and prices have dropped from .343 85 a pound dcun to about 040, this is still considerably more than the 36 to 09 per pound that prevailed in the mid-1970's. In 1975 '.!catin; house cancelled orders with 27 utilities because 89 of the price jump. Some of these utilities have settled vith

.iestin; house in court cases. The government is undergoin; a massive se?.rch for uranium under a pro;ran called :D23. This is to be ready by 1980. 1:evar thel: s s , th,re has been nc major ne. U.3. urar.1un finds in the last 17 yaars.9 The long-tern supply sf uranium is vary uncertain. ,.,

.,

in 04/

!

. .

i Page 18 - Argonne l

Betty Yassie and tuenty-five other Havajo uidous of 2

uranium niners, and the many uranium niners uho have retired and are nou dying of cancer in the hills of Red Rock, Arizona,  ;

I i

have been ignored by the state and Federal governments as well as by uraniun companies.91 The major killer in uranium nines 0 l is the radioactive radon gas that escapes fron the uranium ore.'1 -

!

The dangers of radon have been knoun for at least 50 years, but f the I.20 refused to admit that danger uas present for the first 20 years of nuclear energy development. Dr. Joseph '.lagoner, director of epideniolo;ical research at the National Institute I

'

for Occupational Safety and Health found that "far too many '

91 Havajos nave needlessly died" of lung cancer.

Oscar Sloan, a fcnaer miner living in an isolated community

!

near Monunent Valley, Arisona.; says that "all the people here o, ,

'

have used the uranium unstes to build cur houses' The company o

n.ver told us they vere dangerous.'lSome uhite non came here a couple of years a;o and said ue shouldn't live in our houses.

They said the Government vould jet us neu houses because our homes are radioactive, but they never did."91 It brings to R Q mind the -ituation in Grand Junction; Colorado uhere the g a r, N

Federal government through taxpayer dollars is digging out g and removing tailings used as fill around homes and uhere g r i floors in cchools vere replaced. Another nistake by the S Q-

"-

(" c_,

government?

In Galt '.ake City there is a pile of uranium tailings 0

covering 150 acres.'2 Hou the state and city stopped on issuing buildin-; permits uithin a half nile radius of the pile.'"

A contarcial building adjacent to the pile had 50 times the allowable government lini; of radiation and the ;amna radiaticn 076 048

i

'

'Page 19 - Argonne coming from the pile war 100 times normal background levels.92 I The government is to assume the responsibility for renoval j which is another bailout by the taxpayers. f There are 24 tailings piles alone in the Vest. Hauling the pile away in Salt Lake City to a desert would cost from 92 34 million to J6 million. Covering the site with 20 feet of dirt would cost about $2.4 nillion. Some piles are eroding and some are blowing away.

On July 16, 1979, 100 million gallons of radioactive water and 1100 tons of uraniun tailings and much of the contaminated uater dan holding the tailings burst only 15 miles from Gallup, New Mexico.'3 The spill has left hundreds of tons of contaninated soil around the mill and some tailings and nuch of the contam- '

inated Vater has rushed as much as 80 miles downstrean along the

,

river bed.93 It is not knom hou much radioactivity has seeped j i

into the river ban'.:s and into groundwater and drinking water i supplies. Another instance of radioactivity creeping and seeping into our environment.

With u anium supplies unknown in the long run, fast breeder reactors have been proposed. They are suppose to make enough fuel to supply other reactors. The Clinch River Breeder reactor that is proposed would have a doubling time of more than 20 years o

to make enough fuel to fuel another light water reactor.'h A fast braeder would have 1 to 3 tons of plutoniun in its d core when it only takes 4 to 159 to make a bomb. It would Q G use liquid sodiuu for coolant which is explosive on contact b %

dith air or rater. Fast breeder are said to be inherently bb more dan:;crcus than light water reactors. g;aa

~

The Fast Flux T3st Facility is a sort of prototype for a @

fast breeder. Annual operatin; costs are 350-70 million, and 76 049

.

. .

Page 20 - Argonne although in 1969 its cost was estimated at $87 million, that 94 has now risen to 0647 million. Another taxpayer cost of nuclear pouer.

Plutonium is one of the most toxic things known to man.

One milligram ever so much smaller than a pinhead would cause you to be dead of massive fibrosis of the lungs within hours.

If you were to inhale one thousandth of that amount, one microgram, there is a good chance that you would eventually get lung cancer. The smallest amount from which a bomb can be made is 4 y's. To make a Hiroshima-sise bomb would take about 17#s.9 The floating nuclear plant idea seems to have fiszled for the time being as the orders for 8 have not materialised.

Dismantling, entombing or mothballing nuclear plants aftar their 30-year lives vill be costly in money and could be costly in vorker health. Costs of dismantling range from 331 million to G100 million if the job were done today.

Several isotopes like Nickel 59 are captured by the reactor's stainless steel parts and vill take $O0,000 years to decay to safe levels. Workers may have to take parts of the structure apart under water to protect themselvas from radioactivity.

Even the crane used to dismantle a reactor becomes nuclear vaste. Some argue to wait 100 years before trying to dismantle a reactor.

A Consumers Pouer plan to charge ratepayers nearly G1 billion over the next 28 years for the cost of dismantling Big Rock in 2000 and Palisades in 2007, has stirred a controversy that could affect nuclear pcuer's future in Michigan.98 p

.

~

f:

} [) Ob '

'C

$ i1M]h oJ ~ 1[ A

'

'

_

. .

Page 21 - Argonne  :

l Energency evacuation planning is a disaster waiting to '

0 .

happen.'9 Citizena are kept in the dark about evacuation j

'

procedures and decontamination The equipment used to measure radiation by Civil Defense is not good enough in a major accident 0

situation.'9 Hospitals vould not be equipped to take care of

• hundreds of accident victims. The 1965 Price-Anderson study estimated 45,000 deaths and 100,000 injuries. State o'.'ficials responsible for Indian Point's evacuation planning say they could not evacuate even if there was an accident. ,

~

Sites uith one reactor are prime targets for additional units because of the difficulty in siting reactors due to public opposition. Iluclear energy parks with 9 or 10 plants l

i on one site are being studied by the Federal government.100

'

A South Carolina project would contain 12 reactors generating M li more than 14,000 131 sf electricity near Lake Hartuell on the M c&,  ;-,

Georgia border.

100 The other site is ct Green River in Q C>~5 eastern Utah.100 The largest existing facility puts out R (26

'

-

'

100

@c

.

'

3,200 IEl at Decatur, Alabama. Thus a site, like Rudolph, uhich is known as an alternative site could someday be con-sidered for an energy park as the study talked of "For some o ther use. "

I!uclear workers are at special risk. At levels of exposure the Governnent has considered safe has caused a $$

101 increase in cancer of workers at Hanford, '.!ashington. IGO statistics shou that although the average exposure per individual has fallen from 1100 millirems to 300 millirens per year over the period 196$ to 1975, the avera;e number of p?rsonnel receiving a measurable dose increased from 141 to 102 573 per reactor.

y/6 O!)I

. .

l Page 22 - Argonne t

.

At Indiaa Point 1 P'.12 during the repair of defective stelds in boiler dounconers, 1500 non and virtually every  !

i qualified velder in the area vas exposed up to the dose i

102 limit. I A significant improvement can be achieved in exposure doses only by reduction of the corrosion product activity i

in reactor systems either by means of decontamination I

!

techniques, or, preferably, by measures to control the

-

102 bahaviour of corrosion products. The first attempt to decontaminate a large L'.Ja is planned at Unit 1 of Dresden E!H plant usin.; chemical methods. The main problems with 9

these methods of plant decontamination are first, that the procedures might cause damage to the plant and, secondly, R

'

O that they can give rise to large volunas of vaste that arc O i --

both highly radioactive end chemically toxic.102 Another PJ (Hol',i problem is that decontamination may need to b3 repeated d ralatively frequently, possibly every three or four years, b )

102 with consequent longar outages. The cost is estimated at J36 million and 85,000 gallons of a caustic solvent will be added to the coolin; uatar and forced throu;h 5 miles of piping.

The residue uhen evaporated and mixed with cenent, will fill 600 to 890 55-gallon drums.

Health problets associated with transmission lines are still being debated. Costs of the lines and farmland taken out of productivity need to be considered as nuclear plants built in heavily populated areas could support co-generation and not require the land use or the extra expense of new lines to carry th2 load.

There are hidden costs of nuclear pcuer paid for thr ugh

"/6 052

. .

Page 23 - Argonne taxers, such as, enrichment plancs that operate to cover costs, 2896 fulltime enployees of the 1730, R&D expenses for vaste, and to e=crgency evacuation planning by local and state governments name a feu. The IGC 3esarch Office asl:ed for 329 million more It is difficult to get a total cost for Till related studies.

of hidden subsidies be nuse amounts are spread between various budgets. The D03 budget contains fu-ding of $13 million for study of alternatives to glass for FY 1980. 34C!,700 is for a  ;

special investigation by the Senate Env. & Public Works  :

I Committee's subcocmittee on nuclear regulation. l

!

!

The foregoing is by no mean'; LUID's complete objactions to having a nuclear plant constructed at Rudolph. It does M

cover a variety of subjects because they are all intartuined e..ith the nuclear industry in general and a plant at Rudolp M="0 Uranium miners, uranium till tailings, transportation,

'

b b. 3 , ,

l plutonium, civil liberties, waste, the vorld situstion are g J r p ED all involved together and cannot be separated.

O Therefore, our concarn abcut routine releases of radio-activity, accidental releases, reconcentration in the food chain, nonitoring, fines, accidental happenings that rely on an energency core cooling systen, insufficient insurance protaction, sabotage, blackmail and civil liberties, employee problens, unreliability i I

'

and construction flaus in plants, ovarbuilding and rate structures, reprocessing, lou-level and high-level vastes, anuranium shortage, fast breeders, plutonium, flosin'; nuclear plants, dicMantling, energency evacuation planning, nuclear energy parks, worker health and radioactive crud, vested interacts, transmission

7 6 0..'3 a

lines and 1333 cf farnland as uell as hidden subsidies.

'

3 Sincerely,,3 j

@$2Cr72OM d lYM" 1Tacci Jac60 son, Co-Chairnan a Direc tor of LLiD, Inc.

. 4 BIBLICGRAPHY FOR ARG0 HITS - page 1

1. Proceedings of a Congressional Seminar on Lou-Level Ionizing Radiation, November 1976,79-767 0 Government Printing office

2. South Sea Sky Rained Sickness, Mil.Jau':ee Journal, 7/18/~77 3 U.S. to 3elocate Bikinians, Cites Radiation Sffect, Vashington Post, 4/13/78 ,

i

4. Sheep Ranchers Sue Again, The Daily Journal of Stevens Point,  !

6/13/79 l F. Charge Coverup of Risk Durin Journal of Stevens Point, 6/g 9/79 Nagasaki Cleanup, The Daily

6. US Ignored St:,ly linking A-Tests, Cancer, Boston Globe, 1/8/79 7 Uew Radiation-Cancsr Charge, Chicago Tribune, 4/15/79

8. Uor':er Cancer Deaths are Linked to Radiation, Capital Times of IIadison, February 20 3 1978 9 Pentagon Stalling on Radiation Search 7, The Capital Times of Madison, 3/6/78 l

'

10. Thyroid Cancer Linked to X-ray Treatment by Paul 3. Rubie, M.D. ,

The Daily Tribune of Uisconsin Rapids, 6/20/79

11. Nuclear Uaste the Time Bomb in Our Bones, a sunnary of the '

book Methodology for the Ctudy of Radiation 3xposu"e in the Miduest by the LCD/L3AF Research Tean and Dr. Chz.rles i Huver, 1979 i

12. Cancer Facts 6: Figures Relating to Uisconsin, Papers #1 and C-S

1. 2, 1979, by Naomi Jacobson of LAUD, Inc. -k,

13. Hou aadioactive is Cur Milk? The Urgent Heed for Sound Monitoring and Public Disclosure, Another Mother Fund fo " C 1 Peace, 407 Horth Maple Drive, Beverly Hills, California e C'2fB l 00210' May 1979 QQ

' i l

14. Three Mile Island Leak Inpassible to Tally, The Milraukee Journal, 6/23/79 b'

g

15. Self-Monitoring, Conflict of Intel;st Clouds the TMI  !

Radiation Research, Critical IIass Journal Vol V, #3, June 1979

16. U3C Requires Hearings Before Unit 1 Je-opens, Press Info Atomic Industrial Forun #103, July 1979

17. I]11ncis Utility in Uuclear Mui; Uater, The Capitn.1 Times of Madison, 4/19/78

18. Connunities 31ock Shipments, Touns Cities and States Protect Themselves Fran Deadly Cergo, Crit 1 cal Mass Journal, January 1979 "l; 054

. . i

.

Bibliography w page 2

.'

'

19. Moving on Transportation, the ITRC Lays Doun Sone Lars for Our nuclear Hi;;hways, Critical IIass Journal, June 1979 l i

'

20. These Connunities Have Restricted Ship: rents, Mtical Mass Journal, January 1979

21. Nuclear Shipments: ' Leave the Driving to Us'?, People and Energy, September / October 1978

22. Nuclear '.laste Shipping Cask is Defective, The Daily Tribune of Wisconsin Rapids, 8/1/79 23 Safeguards as part of Fact Sheet on Liquid Metal Fast Breeder Reactor Progran, 33DA, special issue, 11/21/75

24. Railway Balks at Hauline Carload of Used Aton Fuel, Chicago Tribune, 4/24/74 .

,

'

25 Nuclear Power: Uninsurable, Progressive nagasine of Madison, 1974

26. Reinburscnent Provided More Than 3,000 Fan 111es, Atomic Industrial Forun Press Info, #103, July 1979 27 The Significance of Sillclood, the Logic Behind the Jury's

$10 5 uillion Auard guestions Several Assump% ions Protecting the Huclear Industry, Critical Mass Journal, May 1979

28. Tc:: Code Doesn't Consider Nuclear Accidant Losses, The g---f]

vaily Tribune of *.lisconsin Rapids, June 2, 1979 '

29 NRC Invites Public to Subnit Information to Assist in Deternination on Three IIlle Island Accident, NRC Heus G

'

F7 Release, Volune 5 #26, Week ending 7/20/79 ,

30. Nuclear Developnents, Electrical World, 3/15/79 bbi j Nuclear Plant Guarcs Get 20 Days for Falso Reports, The g[r k 31.

Milwaukee Journcl, 7/15/78 g

32. Movice Uriter Stirred Up US, The Milwau'cee Jou"nal, 3/11/79 33 Nuclear Update, People and Energy, June / July 1979

34. Oversight Hearings on Uuclear Energy--Safeguards in the Donastic iluciaar Industry, Serial v94-16, Part 7I, pages 415-417 35 Latest Morry: T?r"orists Using High Technology, U.S.

Heus & Ucrld Report, 3/14/77

36. The 1975 Record of nuclear Reliability, Countdoun to a Huclear Moratoriun book, 1976 37 Energy in Focus, 3asic Data, Federal Enargy Administration, F3A/A77/144, May 1977 076 Ob5

. .

Bibliography - page 3

38. Utilities Capacity, are Accused The of Alterine Uall Street JournaY,February Figures15, on 1977 nuclear 39 Huclear Pouer Some Basic Economic Issues, Countdown to a nuclear Moratorium, 1976

40. b J mt at Haven May be Abandoned, The Miluaukee Journal, 5 77

41. Arizona PS Suspends Plans for Construction of Tuo More Reactors, The Vall Street Journal, 7/18/79

42. Vall Street's Dumping nuclear, The Power Line, Vol. 4 #11, June 1979 43 nukes Cause Price Hike - Seattle, Prairie Sun, Vol 3 #8

44. 1979 Nuclear Plant Survey, Attrition Besets Nuclear Market, Electrical Ucrld,1/15/79 Babcock & Uilcox may be Uith-45 The Great nuclear Fizzie, Building Business, Critical Mass drauing from the Reactor-Journal, June 1979

46. Bank of .berica 2npects to 3asure Nuclear Loans, Atomic Industrial Forum, 103, July 1979 47 Other Landers Shun Bank of America's Huclear Moratorium, The'.lall Street Journal, 3/14/79

43. Nuclear Pouer: Does Coal Make Cheaper Ener;y? The Chicago Tribune, 4/8/79 d 49 A-Plant Supported Despite Its Cost, The Hiluaukee Journa32 50.

7/27/77 Post-Accident Costa May be Biggest Hurdle for Nuclear SQ[

Expansion, The '.lall Street Journal, 4/24/79 8 @gj

51. Capital Funds, Slectrical '.lorld, 3/1/73, page 39 5 2< h

32. Finance, A Tight Corner to Turn, Electrical '.lorld, 5/15/79 R The Management Report Fictitious Margin?, Electrical 53 World,3/1/73,pase35

34. State of L?SC, Draft 2nvironmental Impact Statement, Pro-posed '.JP&L Co. Tariffs for .31ectric Utility Service, Docket 6680-U3-5 55 We Can't .df ord 2nargy Ignorance, The Miluaukee Journal, 2/25/79 Ho Uukes, Overyone's Guide to Nuclear Pouez by Ann 1 Gyorgy

56. '

& friends, 1979, page 37 c;76 U30

. .

'

Bibliography - page 4 97 Energy Alternatives: Blueprint for the Future, Barron's nagazine

58. Iluclear Agency Seeks to Strengthen Its Role in Promoting Safety, The Uall Street Journal, 8/7/79 59 URC Finally Tells PSI to Stop Pouring Concrete at Marble Hill, official ne.!sletter of Save the Valley, Inc. ,

Volume 6, July 1979 60 Nuclear, 31ectrical World, 7/15/79, page 13

61. Posed as Engineer en Nuclear Project, The Daily Journal of Stevens Point, 7/12/79

62. Inc. to Pay Florida Power $3 6 Million Gilbert Associates,l in Lausuit, The Ual Street Journal, 9/5/78 63 Inadequacies and Reform in Management nuclear Power Plants Deliverability quali $y Assurance by P. T. Faulkner, Senior Systens Engineer, Stanford University, Box 4511, Stanford, Ca 94305, February 1974

64. Getty Unit's Radioactive Huclear Hastes, Costs Involved Studied by House Panel, The '.f all Street Journal, 3/10/77 65 Scott Acts to Halt A-:laste Dunping at Morris, Sun-Times, 9/21/77

66. The Most Hazardous Jesiness, The Atlanta Jcurnal and Constitution, 2/2/75 67 Letter of 5/18/78 to Janes Volter, Hearing 3xaniner, Nis.

PSC, fron Mrs. Uend Schaefer, Shecoy;an, Uis. 53081

68. The Accident Hazards of Storing Highly Radioactive Spent Fuel Rods at Huclear Power Plant Sites like Braiducod at at Away-Fron-Reactor Sites like the Morris Oueration, O Q2 1 O f_?

^

Catherine quigg, PSP, 4/19/79 g _

' '

69 Dreyfus Reassures aesidents About Huclear .laste Plans' The Daily Tribune of '.lisconsin 3apids, 8/17/79 d @-

70. HURSG-0499, Supplement 1, General Considerations and k3 #

'WT.

'

Issues of Significance on the Evaluation of Alternative Sites for nuclear Generatine; Stations Under U3PA, December 137{ 9

71. Alice in Uasteland, a Tale of Federal Policy Failure, ' 'l

3. Myers, Geology Dep: 3 IT.i3C , 10/15/77

72. Under;round Seepage Zats at W.laste Burial Systen, The Miluau:Me Journs.1 4/15/76 3

73 Hou are :le Goin; to Icep It Dorn on the Faru?, Citisens for a '5atter Envirm.nt, Suite 2610, I? 3. Van Juren, Chica;o, Illinois 6C6vJ3 ..pril 1978

.

G ] (3 UNl

.

.

Bibliodraphy - page 5

74. Government is looking for Disposal Sites for accunulated, and Possibly Hasardous, Huclear '.lastes, The Neu York Tines, 4/16/78 75 see 76

76. States May close A-liaste Dunps, The Hiluaukee Journal, 7/19/79 77 Radioactive liastes: A Comparison of U.S. Military and Civilian Inventories, Science, 8/26/77, page 883

78. Oninous Problen: ;Ihat to do 1/ith Radioactive laste, Smithsonian Magasine, April 1974 79 nuclear :laste Disposal: Alternatives to solidification in Glass Proposed, Science, Vol 204, 4/20/79

80. Glass, 3 alt Challenred as '.laste Disuosal Methods, The

~

ilashington Post, 127'24/78

81. U.S. Study Finds nuclear Maste Disposal is Possible but Could Take 17 More Years, The Vall Street Journal, 10/20/78

32. DOS Officials Lied About Veto Pouer, Albuquerque Journal, 12/30/78 33 Carter Uculd Inport Nuclear Plant Mastes, The Daily Tribune of Wisconsin 3apids, 8/17/79

34. State Urged to 3 hare !!uclear Uaste Burden, The Daily Tribune of Uisconsin 3apids, 8/3/79 83 U3 May Buy Isle for A-Waste, The Milwaukee Journal, 8/19/79

86. Radiation Roulette, Cnce You Start Ganbling on Foreign Nuclear 3eactors..How Do You Stop?, Mother Jones, August 1979 87 Votin; Pouer in 122 Big Firms Centered in Feu Institutions, The .lali Street Journal, 1/19/78

83. DO3 2eports Results of Uranium Price Survey, DO3 Information, Ueekly Announcements, Vol 2 550, ' leek 3nding 12/12/78 q 39 Cost to Uestinghouse on Uranien Pacts 3stimated at $2 5 Billion as Trial Open, The .icll Street Journal, 10/21/76[2Q Q

90. ;Ie Hay Find Ourselves 3hort of Uraniun, Too, Fortune D, W, -

Magasine, October 1975 bs Oy

91. Bury My Lungs at Red loc':, The Progressive Magasine of Madison, Fcbra.ry 1979 Q ]m' f

92. Problen of c '.lastes ; ion't Go . uay, The Milraul:ce Journal, 4/11/76 R

93 Dan 3a"sts, spilling Uranlun ;iastes, Juardian, S/22/79

'

9~4 The '.lorri.rone Plutonium Genic, The Daily Tribune of

'lisconsin Rapids, 7/21/79

.

o;/ 6 058

. .

Bibliography - page 6 4

l 95 Nuclear Safety: A History of Deception by George Wald, j Nuclear Hazards neuspaper, 7/24/79 i

96. Scrapping the Aton, US is Facing Problem of Hou to Dis-mantle Used Hucle ar Reactors, The Uall Street Journal, i 10/12/77 97 ' Mat Do You Do Uith a Dead Huke?, Environmental Action,

.

9/10/77

98. Nuclear, Electrical World, 7/15/79, page 13 99 Energency 3vacurtion Planning for Nuclear Power Plants by Naomi Jacobson of LED, Inc., January 1978 100. Feds Still Studying Mannoth nuclear Parks, The Dzt ly Tribune of Wisconsin lapids, 5/9/79 101. Worker Cancer Deaths Are Linked to Radiation, The Capital Times of Madison, Wisconsin, 2/20/78 102. Occupational Radiation Sxposure in L'.lRs Increasing, by Alan Martin, Associated Nuclear Services, 3pson UK, The Levels of Occupational Exposure in EclR plants Could Become One of Industry's Major Problems. Levels Are Already Very High and Further Increases Seen Inevitable As Plants Age 103. Creeping Crud Fuels U-Waste Issue, by Claudia Ricci, March 1979 D*O'O j i

cs es -

D]h aJDAbl i!;ua ,

l

" .i 8 o.c9 3  ;

,

,

. .

Job Service 618 - 6th Street Racine, WI 53403 August 2nd, 1979 5b Argonne National Laboratory 9700 S. Cass Avenue Argonne, IL 60439

'

Dear Mr. Nathanson:

I am responding to your inquiries as listed in your letter dated July 18th,1979.

1. The availability of a suitable labor force in your area for such a plant.

The civilien labor force annual averages have increased from 1960 to 1978. The labor force in 1960 was 52,000, 66,500 in 1970 and estimates for 1977 and 1978 were 85,500 and 88,900, respectively. See the attached labor force information.

Two public high schools are planning to build additional educational facilities for industrial arts classes to increase the number of skilled workers and prepare more people for the trades occupations. This building proposal will go before Racine voters in the fnrm of a referendum.

2. The number and kind of workers you believe would be connuting from home and the number who would relocate in the area.

I believe about 5 to 10 percent of the labor force would connute from their homes, given the incentives. Relocation into the area is hard to determine. No figures are available on relocation patterns. Publicity steming from Three Mile Island and oil prices will be factors to consider when relocating. In my opinion, the kind of workers who would normally consnute or relocate are professional, managerial and technical personnel.

3. Where will the primary labor market draw from?

Paris, WI is located in Kenosha Co. and Kenosha Co. is considered the local labor market. The plant will probably draw workers from within a 30 or 40 mile radius.

4. Is the project feasible from a labor availability viewpoint or will other businesses be adversely affected?

Yes, the project is feasible from a labor availability viewpoint. I do not feel other businesses will be adversely affected.

5. What is the labor market in your trea like as regards to skilled and unskilled workers and unemployment rates?

Skilled workers are always at a premium and Racine is currently experiencing a shortage of skilled personnel. Unskilled workers make up the largest number of unemployed people. Our applicant file indicated 29 percent are unskilled. The current unemployment rate is 3.8 percent. 3,500 people are currently unemployed.

o 7. 6

.

060

.

- .

6. Any other information which you feel we should take into account in our analysis.

No.

Sincerely, WISCONSIN JOB SERVICE Robert J. Brandl, District Director Md M. /%%

By:

Gil M. Martinez Job Service Specialist

_ , <

Q(b oro

. .

USDrpwww d Evnqv ARGONNE NATIONAL LABORATORY 9E SouTk CAss AVENLE, ARCM l{iNOis 60439 Tdq)honc 312/972-3147 July 18,1979 Mr. Robert Brandel Job Service Director 618 6th Street Racine, Wisconsin 53403

Dear Mr. Brandel:

Wisconsin Utilities may at a future unspecified time apply to NRC for a license to put up a nuclear power plant near Paris, Wisconsin, and we are interested in a number of matters which could influence the NRC decision.

The construction period would last nine years and peak employment would be 2200 workers - 1800 manual and 400 skilled.

Could you please tell me:

1. The availability of a suitable labor force in your area for such a plant.

2. The number and kind of workers you believe would be c;mmuting from home and the number who would relocate in the area.

3. Where will the primary labor market draw from?

4. Is the project feasible from a labor availability viewpoint or will other businesses be adversely affected?

5. What is the labor market in your area like as regards skilled and unskilled workers and unemployment rates?

6. Any other information which you feel we should take into account in our analysis.

Sincerely, QdR.Ahm s _ Michael R. Nathanson Division of Environmental Impact Studies MRN:ae TkE UNistasiTy of Ckicxp ARconn UNistRsmEs AssochiloN _, f Q (~)

<,io

. .

4 THE RACINE AREA _

LABOR FORCE

SUMMARY

QUARTERLY AVERAGES Annual Average First Quarter Place of Work Data 1973 1979 Nonfarm Wage and Salary ........ 69,600 69,400 Manufacturing ............. 30,500 31,100 Du ra b l e Good s . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22,500 23,400 Primary Metal Industries . . . . . . . 1,860 1,900 Fabricated Metal Products (Ex. Ord.,etc.) 3,200 3,400 Nonelectrical Machinery ....... 11,200 11,800 Electrical Machinery . . . . . . . . . 3,300 3,300 All other Durable Goods ....... 3,000 3,000 Nondurable Goods ............ 8,000 7,700 Food and Kindred Products ...... 1,120 1,100 Textiles, Apparel % Leather ..... 490 500 Paper, Chemical & Rubber . . . . . . . 4,400 4,200 Printing, Publishing, etc. . . . . . . 2,000 1,900 Contract Construction . . . . . . . . . . 2,500 2,000 Trans. , Com. , Elec. , Gas & San. , Serv. . 2,400 2,400 Trade ............. 12,700 12,600 Wholesale Trade .......... 2,200 2,200 Retail Trade ............ 10,500 10,400 Finance, Insurance and Real Estate ... 2,100 2,200 Services and Miscellaneous ....... 10,700 10,700 Government ................ 8,700 8,400 Federal ............... 430 400 State .............. 1,300 1,300 Local ............... 7,000 6,701 Persons Involved in L-M Disputes . . . . . . 40 0 NOTE: Totals may not add due to rounding.

Data Benchmarked to 4th Quarter 1977.

D 79 0 t

o '

~

o l o, Ob3 T \e Jd wp -]9] _1 3 b

'

. .

.

3 THE RACINE AREA

,

.

.

Seasonally Adjusted Labor Force Estimates Racine SMSA April fiarch April Item 1970 1979 1978 Civilian Labor Force (1) 89,900 89,400 87,300 Unemployment 4,000 3,700 4,600 Percent of Labor Force 4.4 4.1 5.2 Employment (1) 35,90') 85,700 83,200 Tionfarm Wage and Salary (1) fi/A fl/A fl/A (1) Includes workers involved in labor-management disputes.

N/A = Not Available D D 5< J1 M

oi M&Jl]u 6[' ,, y t) i o

. s 17 AREA QAf'fHf qMRA LAli)R FORCE

SUMMARY

S TATE wisCONstN ANNUAL AVERAGES (mcurs anu v, aa)

ITEM 1960 1970 1977 1978 i is eii iv v vs PLACE OF RESICENCE DATA 52,000 66,500 35,500 03,900 C iv l LI AN LABOR FORCE. . .. .. ........ .....

2,600 4,000 4,800 5,000 UNEMPLOYMENT. ............. .... .. .. ..... _

UNEMPLOYMENT RATE. . . ..... .. .............. 9.0 6_1 5.7 5_6

• EMPLOYMENT b .. ............ .. . ..........

alACE OF WOAK OATA 41,600 55,300 66,300 69,600 NONFARM WAGE 6 SALARY ...... ........... ...... ....

PA NUFACTU R ING. . . . . .. .. ...... .. .. ..... 19,700 24.900 29.100 30.500 DURABLE GOODS....... ...................... 14.000 18.100 21.300 22.500 Primary Metal Industries 1.300 2.200 1.660 1_960

'

Fah Ha+al Dend Irvne ned atr 1 1 Rne' 1 n7A 7 non 7 Ono Nonelectrical M3chinerV

-

t i '966

'

5: OC '

0' 00 10:700 Electrical Mach. . Equipment ', Supplies 3,000 1. . 3.100 3:300 All OthEP 00rable Goods 2.000 2.900 2.900 . O 5,700 6,800 7,800 8,000 P%DfA8L5an ff@w wwum " " """ sou 1,mu 1, uu lext11es, Apparel and Leather 570 500 490 PaDer. Chemica s cnd Rubber 3.000 . 00 4.400 Printinn

• Pohlichinn t Alliod Penducte  ? Anq p_9qn 7;nnq MINING.. ........ ...................... .. _ ,__

_ ___ _ ___

CONTRACT CONSTRUCTION. .......... ......... 1,oua _ ___1,/au c,Ava c,auu TRA NS . , COMM. , ELEC . , GAS & SAN. SERV. . . . . . . 1,800 2,2GO 2,30U 2,400 TCACE. ..................................... 7.600 0.700 1 400 1 .700 WMC L ES A LE TR A C E . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9.400 2.200 R ETA l l TRA DE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0.000 0.500 F I NA NC E , I NSURANCE AND REA L ESTA TE. . . . ". . . . . 1.100 1,450 1,990 2,100 SERvlCES* AND MISCELLANEOUS. ................ 5.400 a,000 10.500 0.700 G0VER t PE NT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ............... . 4,400 7,300 0,300 6,/40 FE C E R A L . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .'. . . . . . . . . . . . 4 jil 430 STATE...................................... 1,400 1,300 L0 CAL...................................... 6.600 7.000 PERSONS INVCLVED IN L-M OISPUTES.............. 1,000 340 170 40' 1; I Netuct s L.M Di spu rcs O

D D O[

o a J1 c o p ,9 q 7 gr ,q g Ob3

. i o- C:. ...e c Jg_ g ij b 7-

_

"

'

. . TABLE '

' ARCA RACitJE SMSA t.AcoR rcRCE SussaRY S TATE WISCOPGlN (MONTH AND YEAR)

NET CHANGE

-

PRELIM. FINAL STCM QK M /HQ ' Wf' maj.99 %'y

/92/ / <r 7 /9?S cp", , y Q w 9t I e ils tv v vs PLACE OF AES lOE'4CE DATA Civ t LIAN LATCH FORCC.. ... .................. 9/ /p. o S V90 .o &2bM> .2 //o-o - /.-$"u UNEMPLOYMENT................................. .~Ma o nw 64r O N- ~ 2 fM

• UNEMP LOYMEtJT RAT E . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3. 9 'i' N /.U 4/ dV CMPLOYMENT O................................ 7/0#- o h Od # 9(~ "/# e / %'-o /04 0

..

PLACE OF WORK OATA hCNF ARM M AGE G S A LARY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ')p 2.a-o /) f -3,*. -o ')/Vs -o /Qo It/s o MANUFACTURING............................... 3 24/s e l 2 / j'.s -c .2//o o d. e .c / San-e DURABLE 300DS.............................. D W 4 e --< D 3 .s-e I 2 2 *At t' 4 /o--e NC e -o' Prim rv L'a+n l indne rine / S' 9 e / V ?o / G e-c 22 - /O ' -

Fab. Vetal Prod. (Exc. Ord,, etc. ?6 ~ Me-o Ms.uo /<-o .B a-o Nonelectrical Macninery /2 :t~ / r .< --o // /e-c au f/ m Electrical Mach.. Ecuine nt & Sucolies Me M W- -e M e-c / e-o /e.-o

.

_

All Other Durable Gonds 3/w .-5 / s-o m '+-+-c /9 /e.-o NCNOUP A EL E G00CS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 /e.-<> W.u c 8%--o Nem d o-o Food and vindrnd orndur+s // o- o /// c /// o - /o fo Textiles. Accarel and Laathar dpo 99c S/C So o Pacer. Chelicals and Rubber vw:--c M 4-e </ 7 e.-o /o-o _3. -o Printing. Pbblishing & Allied Products .J o- c / 9 </c 2 / e. -e Co - se -o

.

.

M1NING......................................

CONTRACT CONSTRUCTECN. ..................... ,2 (c & e . us -e ,9 ~7,. x .2 0 c - /s -c TRA NS. , COtm. , CLEC . , GAS & S AN. SERV. . . . . . . ,.2 (/ ~ < > Me -o O (/. o ~ /4-o o TRACC....................................... / 3 9tuo / d 2+ -e> / E s- .<- c /s-o 3 +--e WH O L ES A LE TR A CE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . S 7 N.  ? y -s -<. J p A <- O o R E TA I L TR A DC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . / / / c -e / / e-e c /r 1 e c /s.- e.)  ;-r s. -<.>

FINANCE, I NSURANCE AND REAL ESTATE. . . . . . . . . . S %> 23< e .0 15-o 6 /e-o S ERV I CES AND M I SCELLANCOUS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . // w /r' "> .t e M P~o .~4 o -~) e . <>,

GOVERtt9ENT.................................. F F .cc 0/,< c v . > e- c ~2&c i'e-- c FCCCRAL.................................... %c -ivG e/ < / r sc. ~ rc STATE.............................'........ . / -? t o /4 . r,. /.fi/r -/c

.- r LOCAL...................................... '9 / e- o /~ 'Je e %w 2H -- 't M

• PERSOPS INVOLVED IN L-M OISPUTES.............. O o /C e -/O 1./ lhcLucts L-M 0:sevics

.

,i o990 ,9l'o h~

a J JL DILDR.RES 16$28 p

(R-79)

U -

Q

- s.g

5 A-16

..

PROJECTIONS 1980: POPULATION, LABOR FORCE, UNEMPLOYMENT BY SEX AND MINORITY STATUS .

f

POPULATION 1980 1980 1980 UNEMPLOYED UNEMPLOYMENT RATE AP 0 WHITE MALES 77,682 45,228 2,477 5.5

.

WHITE FEMALES 85,777 33,579 2,907 8.7

,

BLACK MALES 7,102 3,608 587 16.3 BLACK FEMALES 7,407 2,681 654 24.4 OTHER MALES 409 150 13 8.8 OTHER FEMALES 523 247 30 8.8

,

TOTAL 178,900 85,494 6,668 7.8

• LAWRENCE BERKELEY LABORATORY PROJECTIONS FOR RACINE SMSA

.

)

. <

..* ,.

Robert D. Ray, Governor Colleen Shearer Director 5 Iowa Department of Job Service

'f OFIOWA Phone: (319) 556-5800 August 2, 1979 Mr. Michael Nathanson Argonne National Laboratories Building 10 Argonne, Illinois 60439

Dear Mr. Nathanson:

I have been able to obtain a few facts for you concerning the construction of the power plant at Lansing, Iowa. I spoke to Mr. Michael Chase, Production Department of the Interstate Power Company in Dubuque. Mr. Chase said that the Lansing plant took four years to complete (1973-77).

Fegles-Power Service Corporation out of Minneapolis was responsible for the project. Employment ranged from 180 to more than 700. The construction company brought along their own supervisory personnel, but recruited most of the other workers from the local area. Some of the electricians caue from Dubuque. A large number of workers commuted from Lacrosse, Wisconsin.

Mr. Chase does not recall any difficulty experienced in recruiting the unusually large number of workers that were needed for the project.

Overtice may have been an incentive, since the project started one ur late with no changes made in the scheduled completicn date.

My conversation with Mr. Chase 'eads me to believe that a similar project could be undertakan in the Glen Haven, Wisconsin area. Skilled labor could probably be recruited from the larger cities such as Dubuque, Lacrosse, and Madison.

Dubuque Job Service currently has 22i applicants on file who are occu-pationally coded in the construction trades. See the breakdown provided on the attachment.

Very truly yours, w /w h ru W

'

Ann Wagner Manpower Research Economist Enclosures

.,

O Job Pixement c46

,

'

Job Insurance

. .

-

ACTIVE FILE TALLY FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OCCUPATIONS:

222 - TOTAL I?8 - construction workers and carpenter helpers 39 - carpenters 15 - operating engineers 9 - roofers and related 5 - asbestos and insulation workers 5 - floor laying and finishing 4 - construction and maintenance painters 7 - miscellaneous construction occ.

_, f Ob

~

oIO l

. .

jyf% SOUTHWESTERN WISCONSIN

/t . ,Yi REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION 217 PIONEER TOWER . PLATTEVILLE, WISCONSIN 53818 PHONE 608-342-1214

f 1-August 17, 1979 Mr. ?!ichael Nathanson

-

Argonne National Laboratory Building 10 Argonne, IL 60439

Dear Mr. Nathanson:

I am sorry to be tardy in responding to your request for a copy of the Grant County Comprehensive Planning Report. I con-tacted the Grant County Zoning Administrator to see if he could send you a copy of the report, but he does not have any extra copies either. Therefore, our only alternative is to Xerox a copy, but this would cost you $14.00 since there are 140 pages at a cost of 10c per page.

Please let me know if you still want us to Xerox the report.

Sincerely, l.L (E$) L1vY k .'f-Donald E. Rosenbrook, Director S.W. Wis. Regional Plan. Commission it

-

I U

') l /.

. .

.

- .

_

-

_

u1 _

- =

_

_

- -

July 20, 1979

-

v Michael Nathanson Argonne NL:ional Laboratories Building 10 Argonne, Ill. 60439

Dear Mr. Nathanson:

It is my opinion that the actual building of the proposed nuclear power plant at Haven, WI would not have an adverse impact on the con-struction industry in the Manitowoc-Sheboygan Lakeshore area.

Haven is located between Manitowoc and Sheboygan, and the project would attract skilled construction workers from both areas. Although these two areas may not be able to supply the full number of approximately 400 skilled workers needed, Haven is commuting distance to four other large cities that should have sufficient numbers of skilled workers to fill any shortages. Milwaukee to the south, Green Bay to the north, and Fon du lac and the Fox Cities to the west are all within an hour to.an hour and one half driving distance of Haven. Workers employed at the proposed project from these four cities could either conmute daily, or live near the site during the weekdays and commute home weekends.

Also, in my opinion, the existence of such a large project as a nuclear power plant would not impede the completion of any other con-current local construction projects.

Sincerely, f f y gsg 0 Thomas A. Kuchenbecker Job Placement Supervisor Manitowoc Job Service O'

d((

- .o

. <

l _

.

-

,

-

~

.

934 Michigan Avenue j P.O. Box 848 Sheboygan, WI 53081 August 21, 1979 Mr. Michael Nathanson Argonne National Laboratory Building Number 10 Argonne, Illinois 60439

Dear Mr. Nathanson:

This letter is in response to your request for labor force information for the most recent few years for Sheboygan County and immediate adjoining area which is within a commuting distance. In considering a reasonable commuting distance consideration has ;o be given to current highways and the fact that Interstate 43 is complete south of Sheboygan. We believe up to 45 miles is reasonable that direction, but only about 30 miles west and north due to poorer roads. However, some sections of I-43 are completed and in use between Sheboygan and Green Bay and additional sections are under construction or planned for the next few years, so commuting distance from the north will be extended in the future.

This commoting area includes Two Rivers, Manitowoc and Reedsville on the north; New Holstein and all Sheboygan County on the west; West Bend on the southwest and south to about Milwaukee County line. The total population for this area is about 270,000 and an average civilian labor force of about 140,000. Included in these totals is the 100,900 population and 54,900 civilian labor force in Sheboygan County.

The average unemployment rates for the whole area were 3.6% for 1977, 3.8% for 1978, and 3.3% for the first six months of 1979, with Sheboygan County slightly less than the entire area for each of the periods listed.

We believe there will be a sufficient work force available to meet the employment needs you outlined to me, provided the wages would be attractive enough to give an incentive to commute to the Haven work site after considering rising trans-portation costs. This is particularly true for the manual untkilled positions.

It will be more difficult to recruit skilled craftspeople in sufficient numbers from within this area, but experience has shown that any major construction project of any great duration will draw skilled workers from out of the area.

A project of the size and duration you described to me certainly would have some effect on area business and industry. It would have the greatest effect on the low paying, entry level manual labor force worker and those employers whc use these workers. Any such effect on the individual communities in the area would be beneficial overall and would result in an improved economy for the entire area.

m7

\\ \ u o[l, b

. .

.

Mr. Michael Nathanson Argonne National Laboratory August 21, 1979 I regret the time I have taken in giving you this information, but I did tell you I was going on vacation when you called me, and I have just now returned.

If there is any further information i can give you please let me know.

Very truly yours, JOB SERVICE OFFICE

<b b w k h tlk Glen R. Garey, District Director GRG/mk

< dl eio

. .

.=

'. - '

.

.~

w v . . .. g.-

-

July 19,1979 Mr. Michael Nathanson Argonne National Laboratories Building 10 Argonne, lilinois 60h39

Dear Mr. Nathanson:

The following is information you requested concerning an interest in the Central Wisconsin labor market area:

The 2200 construction workers, consisting of 1800 =anual laborers and 400 skilled workers, would consist of all union construction workers which are avaihble in Central Wisconsin. The skilled and supplemen-tary personnel could be normally drawn as needed from the adjoining area and stater, through usual union hiring pro mdures. The 150 per-manent local workers should pose no problem upon construction of the facility.

As far as housing is concerned, the 150 "outside" specialists would find a buyers market in Central Wisconsin. Both rentals and houses are available for sale in all price n nges.

As you can imagine, because of the nature of the facility currently under consideration (i.e. public opir. ion, etc., etc.) no guarantee can be made that a labor source would be readily available.

Yours truly, I i  ?

/,  !

./. _ j.T ;L. -~

.-

q  ::.f

, ..e,u Clayton C. Harp District Job Service Director CCH:dg rg } ()

. -

..

-

_

_- ,

' ~

_ ,

. , L-. t- _' _ _

~

. ;. -

~

.

211 North Parker Drive Janesville, Wisconsin 53545

--

July 23, 1979 7 '

Mr. Michael Nathason Argonne National Laboratories, Bldg. 10 Argonne, Illinois 60439

'

Dear Mr. Nathason:

This letter is in response to our telephone conversation on July 19, 1979, regarding the available labor force in the Lake Koshkonong area in Wisconsin. As I mentioned to you, I am currently the District Job Service Director of both the Watertown District and the GROW (Janesville) District. Lake Koshkonong is located within the Watertown District while Janesville is in: mediate adjacent to the Watertown District.

I do not anticipate any shortage of construction labor during the fourth and fifth year of construction. I firmly believe the construction unions will fully cooperate as the construction workers are union affiliated.

Within a 50 mile radius of Lake Koshkonong there is an estimated population of approximately 2.6 million people and an estimated labor force of 1.4 million. The 50 mile radius, or up to one hour travel time, is considered to be the norm for construction workers in this area. Please note attachment "A" which lists the estimated population and estimated labor force, and "B" which is a map of the area. Also attached is the 1979 Rock County Area (Janesville/Beloit) Annual Planning Information.

If there is any further information you may need, feel free to contact us.

Si c y, Glenn F iedl GROW District Job Service Director GF:pmc

Enclosures:

3 k3

[ (3 s

.

. .

.

'

.

714 First Street Wausau, WI 54401 (715) 842-0840 sy July 23, 1979 Mr. Michael Mathanson Argonne Laboratories Building.10 Argonne, IL 60439

Dear Mr. Mathanson:

The Wausau District Job Service Office covers Marathon and Lincoln Counties.

The statistics that are enclosed are basically for that area.

The chart showing the applicants available and job openings may give you some indication of the activity and the labor force in our area. These figures are total accumulative figures from October 1978 through June of 1979. The table showing structural applicants available for this same period of time are indi-viduals who have registered with our office and were available at some time during that 9 a.onth period.

As I mentioned in our telephone conversation, the Weston power plant, which is located just to the south of Wausau, is in the process of expanding their facili-ties. This Wisconsin Public Service Corporation facility is expanding their coal generating capacity. For the past year they have been in the process of building a generating plant that will utilize western coal. At present, they are averaging approximately 200 employees on this construction site. They have been mainly utilizing local labor thus far. However, within a year, they expect their peak employment to rise to approximately 450 workers. They have indicated to me that they have had no problem in finding qualified workers for their job. Even the truck strike which we experienced recently did not delay their project at all. They plan on testing their new plant in December of 1981, and they plan on going operational in 1982.

I hope this information is useful to you. If you have any questions per-taining this information, or need any additional information, please let me know.

Sincerely yours, DEPT. OF INDUSTRY, LABOR AND HUMAN RELATIONS

, E

, ,.- ',,,. _ ' -

James X. Dreyer Job Service Director JXD/ ras enclosures t

e!b

.4

.' .

%

WAUSAU DISTRICT Structural Applicants Available From October 1978 thru June 1979 OCCUPATIONS Number of Apolicants Tinsmith % Coppersmiths, & sheet metal workers 31 Transportation equip. assemblers & related occup. 13 Body workers, transportation equip. 31 Automobile body repairer 25 Arc Welders & cutters 91 Resistance Welders 2 Welders, cutters, & related occup. n.e.c. 66 Welder, combination 50 Occup. in assembly, installation & repair of lighting equip.

& building wiring, n.e.c. 77 Electrician 54 Occup. in assembly, installation & repair of large household applicances & similar commercial & industrial equip. 2 Construction & maintenance painters & related occup. 63 Painter (const.) 61 Plasterers & related occup. 31 Cement & concrete finishing & related occup. 67 Excavating, grading, & related occup. 15 Carpenters & related occup. 504 Carpenter, maintenance 7 Carpenter, construction 405 Carpenter (mfd. bids.) II 15 Brick & stone masons & tile setters 72 Plumbers, gas fitters, steam fitters & related occup. 104 Asbestos & insulation workers 13 Floor laying & finishing occup. 14 Roofers & related occup. 35 Misc. construction occup., n.e.c. 761 Construction Worker I 347 Assembler, framer 8 Construction Worker II 359

, .,

16 t

.

WAUSAU DISTRICT - APPLICANTS AVAILABLE AND JOB OPPENINGS October 1978 thru June 1979 -

APPLICANTS JOB OPENINGS OCCUPATIONS AVAILABLE RECEIVED # FILLED  % FILLED Engineering, Social Sciences, Education, Writing, & Admin. 873 152 66 66 Managers & officials, n.e.c. 314 55 24 43 Misc. professional, technical, & managerial occup. 100 22 14 64 Stenography, typing, computing, stock clerks, misc. 2,175 567 331 58 clerical occup.

Sales - services, consumable commodities, misc. sales 882 167 115 69 Domestic service occup. 231 182 178 97 Agricultural, fishery, forestry, & related occup. 246 55 53 96 Processing occup. (metal, food, paper, wood, chemical) 175 62 57 92 Machine Trade Occup. (metal, machinery repairers, printing) 761 145 93 64 Benchwork occup. (fabrication, assembly, painting, repairs) 260 181 180 99 Structural Work occup. (metal fabricating, welders, elec. 2,487 263 202 77 assembling, excavating, construction)

Motor freight occup. & transportation 957 160 117 73 Packaging & materials handling 3,774 381 340 89 0

-~

s t

$

__._.

,

_

925 N' orth 'fadison Lancaster, UI 53813 July 13, 1970

'!r. ?!ichael Nathanson Argonne National Laboratory Building 10 Argonne, IL 60439

Dear 'tr. Mathanson:

Enclosed are informational materials about the Lancaster Labor

'farket Area. Ve have included several copies of the Enclovnent P.eview for Southwest 91sconsin. One is the February report civinn January 1979 statistics, and the other is the most current report with '!ay 1979 statistics. Both have been included so you night connare the differences during periods of high unemplovment and low unemployment.

Ne have also included the Lancaster Labor Area Civilian Labor Force Report for the year 1978. This includes the four counties of Crant, Iowa, Lafayette, and Richland. This report gives a running account of unemployment and ennlovment for the yeat of 1973.

ESARS report M6 gives information on broad occupational codes for the entire district consisting of the four counties previously mentioned. The column headed "annlicants available" includes cumula-tive fi<ures for the current fiscal year beginning October 1,1978. he other columns pertain to applicants actively registered with the Job Service offices at the end of June 1979.

~he tuo lines with red checks pertain to experienced worhers in (3) Structural Occunations and (9) '!iscellaneous Occupations. Please see attached breakout for 9 and 9 occunations. The entry colums pertain to uorkers without exnerience in the broad occupational grounings.

Several power plants have been built in the Cassville area.

Vorkers for these construction projects were provided at the time.

If this area were chosen as a construction site, sone skilled workers might have to be recruited but the increased emnloyment would be beneficial to the econonv of the area.

D D o a lt -C

,o g -

}r

-

7 Q) oJU_S_1 b 'l i 9

. -

'fr. "ichael 's'athanson July 13, 197' Our Lacrosse office can provide you with additional infornation about the labor supply in Crawford County.

If we can be of further assistance, ole.ase call.

Very truly yours, J03 SERVICE DIVISION yYf v' .  :: ,[

Elner J. menitz g District Job Servi e Director EJK:bb Attachnents i

<a.

$l@

W[JUJE, p Jg n

, /

eJ6u u

O

k. ()

.

.

,

'

Postage aruf Fees Paid

. WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRY, LABOR AND HUMAN RELATIONS Employment Security Mail JOB SERVICE LAB 449 o ,,.c m .u - ss PERST CLASS

.

JOB SSMCE M8002802 EMPLOYMENT REVIEW THE LANCASTER AREA

• ELMER KENITZ, DISTRICT DIRECTOR LANCASTER DISTRICT OFFICE 925 NORTH MADISON STREET LANCASTER, WISCONSIN 5'31' JUNE 1979 P.O. BOX 547 RICHLAND CENTER 5'581

• PUBLISHED BIMONTHLY P.O. 80X 123 00DGEVILLE 51533 LABOR FORCE The labor force for May discussed. Nearly all industries report RESOURCES 1979 for this area is est- an increase in activities. The building FOR THE AREA imated to be 53,600 per- trades employers have recalled most of sons with approximately their workers, agricultural chemical 2,040 persons unemployed. The May rate wholesalers and retailers are at a peak of unemployment for the four county Lan- in distribution of products to farmers, caster area is 3.8 percent. A break out Tourist attraction employers have recalled of specific labor force data for each former workers or hired new workers county is provided in the attached 'La- and light manufacturing employers report bor Force Estimates' section of this re- growth in their work forces for the most view. The area labor force has increased part with a few reporting short term lay by 1,800 persons since March 1979 and by offs. The Dubuque, Iowa area is stable 1,300 since May 1978. Also, the number and John Deere is reported to be hiring of persons employed in our area since 50 to 90 new workers. Casoline shortages March 1979 has increased by 2,600 persons were not felt during May 1979, but will and by '2,100 persons since May 1978. A have an impact on our area in the next substantial growth in the number of per- few months. Our July 1979 report will sons available for work is evident and discuss that impact, an important increase in the number of jobs available in the area is also ap- LANCASTER The Lancaster data in the esti-parent. The Lancaster area economic REPORTS mate section shows strength growth has been steady for a number of and growth from March 1979 and years. from May 1978, a year earlier, in all sectors. The rate of unemployment de-AREA EMPLOYMENT May is typically a creased to 3.2 percent from 3.7 per ent AND UNEMPLOYMENT month of high employ- in May 1978. Of greater significance is DE'TELOPMENTS ment and low unemploy- the growth in the labor force of 600 ment. The growth in persons and the increase in the number of the labor force from May 1978 has been employed by approximately 900 persons.

• AREA COVEFED: GRANT, 10WA, LAFAYETTE AND RICHLAND COUNTIES If you do NOT desire to continue receiving this meternel, please check here O and return this cover 5

to above address.

If your address hoe changed,please indicate hereon and return this cover to above add

.

2 THE LANCASTER AREA

'

.

A number of persons had been laid off graduating seniors, in obtaining temp-temporarily, but recall of those workers orary seasonal work and permanent full-is expected in the near future. Foreign ~ time work. Ne urge area employers to imports and competition were the causes. contact their nearest Job Service office for their hiring needs and encourage DODGEVILLE Iowa and Lafayette counties them to hire these young adults.

REPORTS have experienced a signifi-cant decrease in the rate of APPLICANTS Personnel Manager: This ap-unemployment during the month of May. AVAILABLE plicant is seeking employ-This can be attributed to the increase ment as a personnel manager in the normal seasonal trades such as in the private sector. He has a B.A. in construction and agricultural activities. Business and two years experience as a Dodgeville has also been able to add a Personnel Director for a government agen-new light industrial employer to its cy employing over 170 individuals.

list of growing businesses within the Iowa county. Secretary: This applicant has excellent qualifications, three years office ex-Area enployers are reminded that the perience. She does take shorthand, and Dodgeville-Darlington offices are open would like to work in Iowa County.

to assist local employers in filling Please call Dodgeville Job Service at their job vacancy requirements and are 935-9361.

encouraged to utilize our services.

Please contact Dodgeville Job Service at Recreational Vehicle Mechanic: Recently 935-9.361 or Darlington Job Service at separated veteran just completed training 776-4484. in repair of recreation vehicles. Addi-tional background as machine operator, RICULAND The Richland dounty labor force truck driver and welder compliments his CENTER has 7,000 persons employed in mechanic skills. Willing to relocate.

REPORTS the latest reporting period Please contact the Richland Center Job which is approximately'400 per- Service at 647-8871.

sons more than in the same period last year. These figures indicate the impact Production Supervisor: Korean War Vet-of two ncv franchise restaurano openings eran with considerable electrical back-as well as the continued high employment ground. Has seven years experience as levels of industry in both Richland Cen- production supervisor in both an elect-ter and Muscoda. The unemployment rate ,J:al assembly and ammunition plant.

should increase during the sum =er months .. auld also be open for related electrical because of seasonal lay-offs, but we sales work. Desires to stay in this should see an increase in employment as area. Please call 647-8871.

fall approaches.

Construction Specialist: This veteran AVAILABLE Employer requesQ for workers has post-graduate training in industrial EMPLOYMENT during May had been very technology with two years teaching ex-strong. Building trades, ag- perience in agricultural building con-chemical and light manufacturing employ- struction and related fields. Seeks con-ers led in requests for workers from Job struction management work in this area.

Service offices. Demands for workers in Please call the Lancaster Job Service at nearly all industries will continue into 723-2153.

early summer.

Accountant: This veteran has years of SCHOOL The efforts of the high school experience in accounting, bookkeeping PROJECT placement project team members and office management. He has relocated EFFORTS is now directed toward assisting in this area and desires work in the high school students, especially accounting field. Please call 723-2153.

,[

~

L o j t)

. .

THE LANCASTER AREA 3

.

Labor Force Estimates Grant County MAY MARCH MAY ITEMS 1979 1979, 1978 Labor Force 28,200 27,500 27,600 Unemployed 900 1,200 1,210 Unemployment Rate 3.2 4.4 4. 4 Employed 27,300 26,300 26,400 Towa County MAY MARCH MAY ITEMS 1979 1979 1978 Labor Force 9,000 8,800 8,700 Unemployed 410 660 420 Unemployment Rate 4.6 7.5 4.8 Employed 8,600 8,100 8,300 Lafavette County MAY MARCH MAY ITEMS 1979_ 1979 1978 Labor Force 9,000 8,500 8,600 Uner: ployed 310 410 410 Unemploynient Rate 3.5 4.8 4.8 Employed 8,700 8,100 8,200 Richland County MAY MARL H MAY ITEMS 1979 1979 1978 Labor Force 7,400 7,000 7,000 Unemployed 420 460 340 Unemployment Rate 5.6 6.6 4.9 Employed 7,000 6,500 6, 600

"

/6 083

. .

.

WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF Postage and Fees Paid INDUSTRY, LABOR AND DUMAN RcLATIONS Employment Security Mail JOB SERVICE . LAB 449 OFFICIAL BUSih S ggyQ{ggg siE3 SEnWCEp EMPLOYMENT REVIEW

.

THE LAMCASTER AREA

• Elt1ER KENITZ, atSipKT plPECTOR LANCASTEA ci m ICT CFFICE 925 NORN MA0lsorJ STREET LANCASTER WIS00t; SIN 53813 FEBRUARY 1979 P.O. 804 547 4.;nLAND CENTER 53581 PU8LISHED AIMONTHLY P.O. 80x 121000CEvlLLE 53533 LA3OR FORCE The labor force for January the area since Hovamber 1978. January is RESOURCES .1979 for this area is esti- usually the month which reflects the FOR THE AREA mated to be 52,300 persons greatsat effects of seasonal layoffs and with approximately 3,250 withdraal of persons from the area laboe

• persons unemployed. The January rate of market. ~ Havever, when the Jaat'ary 1979 unemployment for the four county Lancas- daca rte compared with the Jarmry 1978 x ter area is 6.3 percent. A breakout of date. e . growth in the later force and an specific labor force uses for each county increase in the number of persons utployed is provided in the attauhed ' Labor Force becomes apparent. That growth indicatus Esticiates' secti on >of this review. The an increase in nonfara jobs for the four area labor force has declined by about cousty ares.

500 persons since che November 1978 report. That decline is typical as IANCA37ER The estiaates for Grant County nany seasonal construct: ion workers and canning proccasin,c runese have eit-REPORTS indicate a substantisi de-crease in its labor fosce, hausted all unemployment benefits end about 1,100 persons, and a slight increase are technically withdrawn from the in the number of perseum unemployed which civilian la'ior force. Those seasonal is complimented by an increase in the workers will nc.raally reenter the labor rate or unemployment to 5. percent frota force in April er May cf a calendar the November 1978 rate of,4.91permat. A

^

year.

comparison between the ofc suary 19M data reflects a substantial growth in the

_ AREA F.MPLOYMENT An examination of the labor force and in the nutaber of persons AND UNEMPLOYMENT data in the astimates employed in January 1979. 'A substained DEVELOPMENTS section shows a typ- growth of two years in, dicscovered when ical declina in the we note that the January 1977. labor. force area labor force and an increase in the was approximately 25,600 perso.1s wich rate ;sf unemplopment to 6.2 percent for 9 beat 23,600 persons employ 2d, An over-

• AREA CCViM Cr GaANT, tr44, LJLFAiETTE ANf A.lChlAtJD (*) UNTIES if you do NOT dessre to contmue recewmg th.: . ,y motorial, please checle here O ad return then cover to e.'Swe address, e

If your address has changed,please mdicate hereon and return this cover to above addr**s.

s se s e s - . . . . . . . .

g

• 8 9.

{$

g g h.

.. . .

'

..

.

.

THE LANCASTER AREA 2

all den.and by the light manuf acturing in- encouraged to refer applicants to Job dustry employers for workers continues Service offices if they, the employers, at this time and nearly neutralizes the cannot hire those applicants. he CETA effects of construction trades, tourist PSE program is primarily designed to pro-trades and other naasonal industry lay- vide work for unemployed persons and offa.

thereby reduce the rate of unenployment.

SCHOOL  % e efforts of the high school DODCEVILLE, Iowa and Lafayette counties REPORTS report that the extreme cold PROJECT _ placement project team members venther during the month of EFFORTS will soon be shifting from January brought the unemployment rata student registration to activi-up, but January is typically a month of ties directed toward obtaining jobs for higher unemployment. It is anticipated those high school students. We that unemployment rates will level of f currently have over six hundred young during the next month and remain high men and women who desire part-time work untii the weather conditions are such and who will desire temorary summer work. Also, rmy of thosestudents will d -

that construction planned for early ,k graduate and many of those graduates spring can begin.

will seek full time, permanent work. 9C7 Area employers are reminded that the Employers can help us help those g kQ Dodgeville-Darlington offices are open students by calling their nearest Job JCQ to assist local employers in filling Service offica and informing that {QJ k Z /gg their job vacancy requirements and are office of any worker needs.

LC3 2ncouraged to utilize our services. This person is { S j

.. case contact Dodgeville Job Service APPLICANTS _ Secretary: " 3

935-9361 or Darlington Job Service AVAILABLE especially well qualified t 776-4484. for a clerical position h~ch within a business and has two years of .

RICHLAND The Richland County labor progressively responsible offica ex-force remains relatively perienct  ? lease call Dodgeville Job CZNTER R2? ORTS constant, but it will it.- Service at 935-9361.

crease with the additional Maintenance Mechanie: This applicant hiring by two franchise restaurants i.uring January and April. Area manu- has recently accended training for

.cturing has increased their labor maintenance facility repair work. Also force with additioaal hiring in the experienced in velding and has some electrical and farm equipment indus- mechanical background. Please call tries. It appears that Richland Dodgeville at 935-9361.

Co m ty has withstood the normally slow hiring month very successfully and Viet-Nam Era Veteran looking for work vill be gaining strength as spring in the area industry. Has military approaches, background repairing aircraft heating and conditioning systems. Willing to Ec.,,loyment opportunities take further training or accept job 4VAILA3LE with similar qualifications. Willing EHPiMYMENT listed with the Lancaster area Job Service offices to relocate. Please contact Richland by area employers continue to reflect Center Job Service at 647-8871.

needs for a great variety of worker skills and great needs, particularly, Recently discharged vetert t with ex-for entry IcVol nonskilled workern in cellent work history desires work as the light electrical component assem- store manager or other responsible sales bly area. Currently, a considerablo work with a future. Has background in dcaand for CETA Public Service Employ- daor to door sales, food service work

r. ant workers exists in our area. In- and general factory. Willing to re-torested candidates for federally sub- locate. Please contact Richland Center sidized CETA ?SE jobs must be certified Job Service at 647-8871.' s a eligible to participate by the nearest Job Service office. Area employers are Orerating Engineer: This person has

, .< iii. E

,/ U UOJ

.

k I 4 i .' .

. .

THE I.ANCASTER ARFA 3 operated bulldozers, scrapers, backhoes Accountant: This person has a degree and reiste.d equipment for a number of in accounting and econowies and will years for a nonunion employer who is soon sit in for the CPA examination. She selling his business. Seeks work in is temporarily employed in an auditing the Crant County area. Picase call the project but would like accosmting or Lancaster Job Service at 723-2153. related work. Please call 723-2153.

.

b IT / ,

, . . . .

,

,

I

,

'

i . ..

I

. .

i THE LA b.....:...,- g Labor Fe,rce Entimates Crnn_t County Jan.  !'ov . Jan.

ITD1 1979 1978 1973 Labor Force 27,900 19,000 25,900 Unemployed 1,440 1 ,4 20 1,210 Unei..ployrcnt Rate 5.2 4.9 4.7 Employeu 26,400 27,(00 24,700 Iowa County, Jan. Nov, Jan.

ITD1 1979 1978 1970 La'sor Force 8,300 8,600 b,300

-

Unenployed 620 $10 660 Unen.ployecut Rate 9.3 5.9 8.0 ,

. Employed 8.000 S.100 7,600 Lafayette County Jan. Nov. Jan.

ITDt 1979 1978 1973 Labor Force 8,300 3,100 S,100 Uncrployeu 430 360 500 Unc;.ployment Rate 5.2 4.4 6.2 Etaployed 7,900 7,800 7,600

.

Richland County e Jan. Nov. Jan.

Ital 1979 1978 197f; Labor Force 7,300 7,200 6,700 Unenploycti 560 490 490 Uncrploy,unt Rate 7.6 6.8 7.3 Employec 6,800 6,700 6,200 0

o a A n.

kl 3 I . I' -

1JU_Al_iM6  ;/6 0 8 'r

.

.

.

..

s, ..

.

.

.

. .

Chh

• y .

. .

~

Pe) m ,

. _ . . . _ . _ _ _ _ _ ._ _ . - . .

'

_

'

-

-_

- L '..- .

" "

s . . _ . - _ . . .. A H t +thonf d66 ^

1_,

F) 74 106L JU'C-CfhTIbuEC c-e-

, tC Sft_a_ _ _Citlef(T

_ _ _ _ _-_ _ . - . . . . . . . _ _ - -.

......--._----____-..--_-_.--....-._-..---_-_.----...-----_-------~___------------~~.--.-_.;.

l__-_.___...._..--- . . - - - - - .

_ _ _. . . . . - - _ - _ . . . .. _ _ T A D t. E _ S 6_. _ - . . - - - . . _ - . _ ;

' - ~ _l_.___....____.l . -. - - - - _ -. _ _ - -. _ _ . - . I, C I I V E _ E . J L E . __ . . . _ _ _ _. - . . . . __ __ . _._ _ _ . - . . _

[4pptICANTSI I i i I 45 ANO 1 1 ECCh.

lAVAILAULE I TOTAL I PCMALS IV2ThhAh5lLhCEA 221 OVER IMIAchtTYlOISACV.

._-....___.-.--____~.__l-___.--....l_._.-_._..I._..__-. _3_______.._l... _ _ _. l i

.____f..______.)

_

_

SLFPAEV CCOES I l l l l l

,

l l _. _ _ . }

} TCT4L...............l 9.5141 a.1031 1. I's C I Se2l 1.*c51 SSSI

.-1................I 1.1441 4911 4153 771 Scl 1.22cl SSI asl Si _15(I ov 1..............! M V sl J4!! 1431 531

__,

414 3tl al -

4tl 3J1

'

................! 2edi tsi - ?ti al 131

. s ................I stel c?l t?! al ci

-

I acl el 21 att e..................I 1.avel cool s e ra l .11- 1E71 51] 21 1971

t-e4.............I 1.1171 4 del atti 241 1478 t?! 21 1,7, 4_-29.............I d6tl 1991 &71 171 401 241 -

l 4; 2.................el I . .J 121 4 J a. l 31 L I 328 1%cl gel 7{ t {i'.,

30................I 7dl J'. I 331 -

l 121  !!! -

) ,,,

4..................! 3121 11dl tel 241 All 323 23 4tg

,

5..................I !tel 941 tel 151 211

) e..................I aGal Itcl til act a ji 2ft 18 ac[

1 1 gi ,3, r..................I i3J 3 ril JcGI tcl 1,11 3?1 tal a. .

p([e..................)

y S..................I 1 3671 t .dl il e d .: 1 S091 ist

r.

• l t521 1sil 15 8 1.+ 31 573 791 ggg gl gg-

gs{

,c-*1.............! '.221 _17 f. i tal

-  !! - ; f ._-. 3cl -

I c,,

'0......... .......!

.

7901 * ' 91 til J: 1  !.:t.-

r_ *.Tcy....,....I att si ;c.. ,

' :: t$t t . 3; ? l ' r. d l j:;l 531 <

l 2,g 3g ,;

.

'

s................l -l it<l l ,t .I ,, ,g

.............. ....! . '

<: . .I_ l l ,, _

i ,.

....... . .......! . .i

-

I  ! t I *i ~l -

.

. -

. . . . . . . . .. .......) 1im a '

l .I t i ;g 1 -

l ,

4..................I

_

.c 11 il I s .1 -

I gg y _.

. __ ; ................. 4 :t '.I I i i si ;g -

{ g;

~

• cps e......... . .......I .'l .I _ l I :l ll .

I g,

. . . . . . . . . . . . ....I '

. ~i I . . . :g - g _

. ..... .... .... I . i e. I i i ;I

,

. -

l .

O t 9. >

_

e i I  ;  !  ! i C53 _t '

i C

.

. ,. ,

'

. * . 8, .

.

. r a

• .

'

.

~ , - . ~ . . . . . . , - ~ . , .-i....._*.=-...rw._,....,.....

a .

. ;)

l .'1 W . . .aJ I.P 41 n Q

w&

W vl wv w u. .= as .si .e 4,e

p. ue c is

.r w.

aw .% -

, 9 i.

..e.

..

S . 1 > 4 4 I 1 . i 40 , . ' p.

-

l u4 . .

' I d e

.

i 1 4 W "*

JU W 1 l

. 4 g

g 0 =. - -- - - - -; i. .,

,

. )= 0 P. N.*.* W .* .s =. W i,P ts e un .e - t I . M i P3 l ,

.

4 1 1 9 l l l 0 1 1 l l 1

i. i . o i e

. 4 i sO

.

'

• '* I j===

di

.m ( 4 i O t i 1===. ==- ==- == = = = = =. -

su . uJ p Nv = =g,=l es us u o ' s. =it s vg cec = = =m =u s =y =' =. p t o i' i; 7 5 J O 4 dJ Od N l f.1 N =. *'t ad til 6%

4 s .a 4 cz i -  ! i 0,,* te 4w I f ti 8 11 e .

V . f.

m2 e

'

g P'

-

eo

> g

.  ! li

,

u i l 3 4 i t

'

m rr. .'i V l.

.

. d - ,n ite; l '

.

'..

I d

l* i i - - - .- -

1 IJ . '-s l

• Ji N N

• l 00 rw

) N.4 a o

'o e - N ".Jl N n c! N N of e n 1 vi (,

.*>l 0 % '.- ,)

Nl 2 t s.

4. ; , , , , .: . m i .. ..,

gr=i w.  :: n *.! l.

.

z' , l i, i itu; . 2 i j

.

i j'

, .

. . i itw,j w I j

-

I. . ,i ,

'

we s i . u n . .

. ,

u -

-t e J  !

t  !

i .2

,

-

o 1,A.  !  :

,i s-,'vi- -i -iii, ,

,

.

l

,, .

.

! u. . - .n c w 1 e su w ,,o

.u n vl es e.i s a e ci i v r 1.

e. n e,I m . .., . . , . . .

j .s  : .' .4 .i wn m- - i , s,  !

': l s, .e m '

-

,

.l

< n t .

6  : 2 , ti e i l 's i .!- . w 1 , ,

. ,

'

' .. il - g  ;

. .

' . . , ." 1 l i i ,

l ' >

• l l , .

i  ; ,. i- - - r-  ; .. ..

i .;- i

,

n nno v,-

e . .r;e o ..,osu. a m Ie a ml

-

.r i .- n n. . = .. .. . .y w i; -

s, n, - c.

.

. . i,

-

a,,

. .,

.I

.o L.

i

- I

l. .

'

.

i

'

6 <

.

• 1

.

.

, ,

, : 9 x j ,

l l i

1 l

w n l

!

l i '

t  !

.

' 'i 'k 1 .  ! j j i .

, I. t -

4 l - .- l--

.

,

i  ;

,

i e i r ,;

4,- -

i-o .tise r m o e o,n2 o 0:n n c.m 43

.-

4

, - -. -

..o': . . . s ,i

.  :. . i

'

l Ns e e .

e, a ,,

f n-N ! .C .4 .

O is i n

.-

m f.) e g 9, y s.!.Je...)e.'de f,ne9- . 4 .s. ..

. ,

l 1 ei,,) < .. -

lm-  !

i g ' !. .

. .

f. *- .* i 1, ,

. .i u~ :j, . t t

l

i i

. . I l

,  : i. =

l i .

l. i i

.

i l

I

.

, . r.

O . i i .c. e .ur.i ,,.,.-i.v i

ii .

1

.,.,..I,.i.--....'

-

o, ...., e o

.o.,r. - ! v r.o om a s o ., o ,iu- n ,1,+ a. .

- - . ..

. . ,. , . . .,.. . . . y o ..

, ,

, ,  ; i eaJ : n -n:n  ;

4. <.n

.

-.

1

-ein,;vn ,

, i

.

, ,

j .

. .t ,6.; v* .'t , r, ,

. .

ta i t i l  ! j

-*

t i  ;

'

, l

!. i. ra-l, t e i' . <

.

l

.

.

I 3

. l l

.

.

,  ;

.

'

i. is>

'

- i. i l i j-q

c I ,

.l-l

. i

\ i ;, i iN <

i:

d.

l

,

. .;. . .i. .

t

..

l

.t . . .

,

. . lI . . . ', . . . . . . .. . ! - . -.;

3..

,

,.

. :

. :

,

l i;

i i;

. .. . .

. .. . ...;...'.......l...i..

.

. . , . . . . . .;. . .t . . .. . . ..

. .

.;. . ..i . . .: . . .

. . .: . . .. . .

. ..l...

. .. . .

.

.

,- . ... .

.

~ ,

, ,

.i . .i. . .. .

.. . . . . ... . . . . .: . . .. . . .. . ei . -

.

,

'

.i . . . . . .: . . .. . . . . . .! .j.. . . . . . . .- . .

. . . . . . . , . . . , . . .t . , . . . . . . . . .;..

, ,

l ....

i. . . . . . .i. . . . . . . . . , . . .. . . . . . . .

.l e, .... .

} ,

.

p..i...........;...!.

. . , . . .. . . .

...

...,...

., . . . . . .

.

, ,

I .c... .:................. .. . .i. . .. . .

...............!..

.. . . . . .! . .

, . ,

.

.;ic....

v . .

.- .- . . . . . . .

.... .

.. .. . . . . . ... . .. . .i. . .i.f . , . . . . .

. ., t >. . .io.

. . . . r ., :i .. . .! . . . .. i . .u .. . . . . . . .

'. , , .

-

. .:.. . ...w.y. . . . . . I .. . . .. . .. . .

6 r,

s

.

,;u a ...

. . . ., ii . . .- . . .;. .

. .f i .

.a .: . . . . . . .

,

s.. , o s .. . o ,; . 3 .o .,...:..o..4 .. . . . . ...

v. . .

,

t. . ,. ii. . .... . ...

f .

.2 s . o

.a u u, ec

. . ..

n

.. . . . , .

,r . v u e. u . p: , a v .n , . -

• ~

Nbf mygg & f - -

-

l

• _

4

.

STRUCTURAL MISCELLAMEOUb .

A t;> halt Pl an t h e r . ------------------------ 869.667-026 . . Auto Service Station Attnd.----------------- 915.f#/-010 Asphalt-Tar-Gra elhoofer------------------- 866.381-010 *

~ Auxiliary Equip. Oper. (power)-------------- 952.362-010 Astenbler, Auto----------------

-

-

. . . - -------- 806.68h-010 Book Binder, Hand--------------------------- 977 381-ob 3rieklayer---------------------------------- 861.381-018 Bu s Dr ive r----- ---------------------------- 913. h 63-Olt h11 dozer Oper.----------------------------- 850.683-010 Chauffeur----------------------------------- 913.663 01r brpenter, 'In:.; e dr & Carpenter-0266----~-- S60.261-010 Compo s i to r-- ----- -------------------- -----973 361-010 C arpe nte r , h ogh---------------------------- 860.381-Oh2 Concrete-Mixing-Truck Driver---------------900.683-010 Cemen t Mason-------------------------------- 8hh . 36h-010 Costumer-- ---------------------------------969 381-010

-

Ceme nt *ias o n he'-p e r------------------------- 869.687-026 , Dunp Truck Drive r-------------------------902.663-010 Central Office Installer Apprentice--------822.361-OS . Ele ct. Monorail Crane Oper.-----------------921,663-Oh?

Construction Worker I------utilities-------- 869.66h-0% En grav e r I------------------------- - - ---- 979 381-010 Ele c tri c ian-------------------------------- 82h . 261-010 ' Engrave r I I------------------------------ - 9 79. 68h-01h Electrician ifelper-------------------------- 829.68h-022 I Gla ss Ins talle r---------------------------- 865. 68h-010 Fireworks Han-------------------------------969.64-010

-carage tervicer, Industrial (Porter b'uses)--915.687-01h Grinder-ChipperII (Rough-cones etc.Hdpedesta1809.68h-026 Garbage Colle c tor II----------------------909.687-010 Highway Maintenance dan--------------------- 899.684-01h , Industrial Truck Oper. (Fork)------------- 921.683-050 Laborer, Carpentry------------------------- 869. 66h-OS Job Pr in te r--------------------------------973.381-018

(. g Lat he r--------- - --------------------------- Bh2.361-010  ! Job Printer (Presse a)-------------------973 381-018 J4aintenance Repairer, Bldg.------- ----------699.381-010 i g'oj Maintenance Repairer, Factory or Mill------ 899.281-Olh [

Labore r, O a s Plant-------------------------953.167-010

!' Laborer , S alvage--------------------------- 929.687-022

, , Qoj ' Oper. Engineer------------------------------ 859.683-010 , Laborer, stores-----------------------------922.687-05t

, 809.381-022 -

Lo g ge r--- --------- --- ---- - --- --- - -------- -921.685-01h gc[ U 9.OrnamentalIron^orker----------------------

Pa in te r------------------------------------- 8h 0. 381-OlO

{

'

' Mate rial handle r- -------------------------929.687-03t I ,c ,. P ipe F it te r------ ------------ -------------- 862.381-018 i j Mech. Shovel Oper. (End Loader)-------------932.683-Olt

&-' Plasterer--------- -------------------- 8h 2. 3 61-018 (M g g): Plasterer Helper----------------------------869.687-026 w ; Plumbe r ----------------------- --- --------- 862.381-030

.

i Motion Picture Pzdectionist---------------- 960 362-OlC

Packager, Hand------------------------------920 587-016 5

t .s.,  ; Package r, Machine---IKI-----------------920.685-078 6 . ' ' Power thovel C;er.--51de from back bucket---850.683-030  ;

!

Porter, Used Car Lot------------------------915.687 022 l, i Roofer, Constr.------ ---------------------- 866.381-010 1 Print Developer, dachine------------------- 976.685-026 U jtheetMetalaorke r------------------------- 8 0h . 2 81-010 Silk Printer Apco - - -- - - - -- - - - - - -979.681-022 Structural Lteel dorker--------------------- 801.361-014 i Stationary Engineer (Boiler Oper, Diesel-Eng ; ,

{ Trailer Assembly----------------------------866.381-058  ; Oper,$ tat Engine, Exhauster Welder, Arc - Gas-------------------------- 810. 38h-Olh *

,

or Oas Eng. Oper.-------950 382-026

• Ueldar, Combination------------------------ 819.38h-010 ' 8 Taxi Driver------------- ---------------- 913. h 63-018 Welder, Gun (Frod, Spot Ueld)-------------- 810.66h-010 '

Tractor Trailer Trk. Driver----------------- 90h.383-010 b ide r-- -- - --- --- -- -------- --- -------------- 8 63 . 6 8h -04 Tru ck Dr ive r, ne avy-------------------------905.663-01h

. Plumb r Helper------------------------------ 669. 66h-01h Truc k Drive r, Light------------------------906.683-022

, jh,,dla (fW % b - - - -

M. b Mh C darcilbrker---handles lumber------ ---------921.683-086

.

- -

- ] Truck Driver helper------------------------- 905.687-Olc

,

-

9 ,

, /. gad- M b)JR 9iU8C#h4 - -

'

~ ' - 706.6$3 084

_ _.

O

'

gg v

e

• \

[

%,h .

C '

...

. *

'

i

.

Wage Survey - May 1979 I. Entry Work Non-Skilled - Light Manufacturing

(

Plant Work Force Entry Wage After Probation Top Wage s A 650 $3.53 +10c 6 mos.- +14c 9 mos. $4.02 - 18 mos.

(Incentive)

B 500 $3.06 +10c 3 mos.- 11c 6 mos. $3.56

. + 9c 9 mos.- +10c 12-18 mos. (Incentive)

L C 200 $3.12 +22c 90 days- +11c 6 mos. $3.76 D 150 $2.94 +12c 90 days- +11c 6 mos. $3.32

$2.99 +13c 90 days- +12c 6 mos. $3.38 ,

E 130 $2.90 +10c 60 days $3.50 - 18 mos.

$3.00 +10c 60 days $4.00 - 18 mos.

F 125 $2.90 +10e 60 days $3.50 - 1 year G 55 $2.90 +19c 90 days $3.67

.

H 225 $2.90 . +15c 6 mos. $3.50

.

5 (I / li

_

e

,

,  %. ,'

'

. . . *s .

.

'

_ _ . . _ . .._ . . . __. _ _ -- i -

o o

o. u.

> c

, = n

.1 ..,

.

e -

...

s J.

W

., e On. e. N.

e N

e. -

ee e. e. e. N tr a.1 oe-M e

es.. . . t . . t . .

o e n. ..eN.

e ..

,

.

.

We .e .e .e .e* N > .e O *-  %

=W a

. O. e N. e.

e e n. . e. e. 3 e O*- I

- NNN. - N --- - - N. N----

.W.

io.

.~

.. g

.

r

,

E e IW i

,> s 1

.04 . .

-. __ ,. -_.e_ _-._--.

..

1 ..e..

.

... e . . on

.O. O. .e e e.N.NNeOe e>N.e.e.eNem e

. e O eon .a n ....Oen.eN.....e......ec..c

.

3 . . a n e. . Sn Na

.. . e e s e . e e

... .- a .e. ese

e. .s e NN e.N n. e. .e .e .e s e s e e e s s e e t

.O... M.eOOe..a.. . * ,. - O e ..

.O M O se ,e. e e, e. . .

. ,

e.e e n N NeeeeN e

. .J .Ne e N a. e e ee . e . e e s e e e e > o e e me -e n N-n N

. .O N .e e .e e.

.

.

e.

.

>

..

.

. i.

.

- g a

.-___.e__-o__--..9 4

, , .. .. m

. ,e , s. . ... . . m. .e. N.. .e . N. .e .N e . . e...NN.O-NomeNo t!

g o, W . a n - - .N .e .....e Z e e e e o e e d g n m es N .o N 3 0 . .e .O e o W

• GEE 9 0 IW O t Z 0DE l 0

0 10 1 e u lu I& e8 e W s 8 W 9 WG B I e 0 0 g . g-. e. _- _.-- - --_ .g

. l .e N M M e R > e e N .o .e , . e .O.OeNe l 4 9.

Dke e e. N .e m N R .e M M - e eN O@W 0

.I e

• is N. > O4 e .e >eN . .o b (eN.e 9 . . O. e 1

> a ,e, . e e e e o e e 9 i 4 1 M .oeN 9 N .ee N - 1 M IO I e .e e I iW $ 0 D 'EE 6 e 0 0 WO # p V D& 4 l M '0 1 0 t N h u& 8

• . E t 6 h i n l W 3

@ 4_ _ __.e-.-

-.,..,e

. 8 e.M. . S N N 9 e S e .e 3 h

e. > m e eN

. e >e .e

. N .e .e .N. .e N i e N . O. > e. O.on..N . . .e M ese e.

. . .e e G.

e @m e

. E e o e o e e e e e

& M M em Of 9 N .e N .e i

> 13 4 -

Z lW W uEE-eW O e E.

B #t pDE l O to e J Cu & 8 l E O

• 6 0

• 2 i L 4 ' 1 W -8 s i O

W

.

g M.O

.

e

_ _ _ el i

g E s 9 e. e .e p N O N e .N Me e. N O -e M N N e N N N . . .e e. pG.p

.e e e 9g M ad I G 3 9 .o O M - I

> EZ t

• e O O =e et .ee .* a U e= >0 $

e E .e g a '

O O T3 e n U I Z b DE D U 9 W 8 8 e 1 E 1 8 I 3 8

__.g_.-.----.__--.4 e e e o e o e e o e e e e e e eO e o e o e e * *e e ri e e e o e e e o e e e e e e e eQe e e e o e e e e e e o e o e e U ,

i e o e o e o e oeOE e e e e e e e e <  %

e e e e o e o e e e euo e30& e e e .&. >Ee e o e e  ;

'

e e e e o e W e e e o me o eOE e * *3wD

• e> e e e e e e e 2 e e e oE e e O e eee e e e e o e me o e eeee e.Z g emo e e e.e. tu .Ze Etu e eW e ^

e e e e o e I e e eO4ee O48 *

• W e e

• d I e o D. e o e ee e eOEOM eW y3WueJ e

• J 0 e e2 e o e me e e ea ogg v o o ey oy e eg .e I > e e 4 e e

!

E en e

e e W e= 0 ezZZ e Z W Isa W e e e e d e o e e&EE5eJ..ZOJ

.

• w* >Jd -J eE

&

W o.

eEW e eW e EZWO e k J W eE e e

i W e eEEI @ e e O O > .3 >J eZO 4 e e e l 3 m >WZZ - e D o s O W ZDEE E E e oOa Z Z. .Z.O0 0 .M e J e. 4 4 u I>03 e h I

> 0 .Z=

==

E to O W W I@ >> >

W O e me E afed<

b o se 3 4 .JEU &lu e> eW 4< *N 3 lu w I eOWEZ e J u Z4Wue* E IW E t > Z OO O ou>d ed

• I E u Jo. - W C 9 f .W 3

EJ@@

We u o e3u E e e .u. We e e3 -4 W

, ocEgO< eZoyZ eIumee ew U t O D EWJ W WZht

• I 1 l l =Z.

OW><

GO4y ee ==es e 3 OE O 4 e EE 3 >IuC..I.eu Ze E4* JWZJe** W4mes.J.2-l 4 5ZZZ&4JE ueaEEWX4 OF ZE Z t I W>0 d. Oe Z Z e. - W 4 6 9J lbWJ .D

= 4IyI E 4 f J 2

>>EEd O/

J e aN < a

%

g

( L

, t

.)

' *.  ? .

=

.

• r

.

-

26 - ~.

u. c. covento captoracNr 6 wages av couMT7 --

secoNo ovaR7tR to7e lova ccuNty [

-_. _....... -....--

I No. or i cowtReo I coveREo *

.

SNoustet I CCvf RE O i RE PORT I NG l EmP FoR APR. I EmP FoR m4V.

l I AVERAGE WEEKLV

- ..__ - _. _-

_ l...Utf1 I3.... ! - _ 1 EmP FOR JUNE l foTAL WAGES I WAGES 4LL INousTRigs........_.....I

3. oa s 1.........-....l....._..;.......I__...*..11*.*~

_.. 1. - ..-

.

4:48 3.7971 t I I I 4.o368 se. sea.3o4 I stat.48 ALL co veR Nuc N7. . . . . . . . . . . . . . I asi I 1  !

9061 e661 4

F r oc R at GovenNueur........I

'

el tal arel a.eas.sst i 162.7e Local GovfRNufMT..........I 318 8848 221 231 es.ese l 295.73

.

I I St el 8583 8.779.694 PRivart covraaGr............I I I I 0 8S9.25 37el a.s9tl I 8 I 2. 09 98 3 3628 6.3te.7*a I 46Ric.. FoR. s pasHING....I I I i 868.04 si mtNtNG....................I 35 tot 401 368

• 171 44.2e4 6

i tos.56 Construct 5(N..............I Sel 2tol 428 sol 123. o3 s 1 208.77 mANuractualNG.............I Jol seal '

2451 3s31 2s71 647.454 8 aoe.as 000 c utNo. prods......l 2el so41 seo.2es a 1378 163.75 Luw. & W OoD PROos.......I 38 488 leal 26el 348.866 8 842.66 PR i c. . & Puettsu. sNous..I 18 t?l S 31 s6l too.688 8 147.0e stour. CLav & Glass PROol I S$ 851 28 Sl of 30.880 l **

macN. teac. ELEc.s......I 11 tool 71 ISet8s 4 **

• ELec. NacaNRr. s cause..I 28 t o si tosi 2ee.see I **

mi sc. .iF G. s78 561 tNous....... 1 81 18 521 sta.tas I **

TRANs. comm. ELec serve...I of 18 too I WNot sate Trace...........I 2sl 3sSI 3sel **

Sal 3s78 3488 3.396.847 1 3o3.at Revant TRaoE..............I soil 3678 see. ore 1381 7721 7991 i neo.7s r: NAN. INsuR. REAL EsT....I 2of 1744 e248 a.o36.3st I ee.es - a tl.oD stRvices..................I ISol 8788 6ol Seel 6t st 404.722 8 875.s4 I_..__.. . .!- 8

__ 8 6til 923.e39 a s t6.vo ot.25 Oo L.... _ 1 ___ :.11*** *** ' '

bd %

, ,

p>M)0 0 h

'

N g -

-

[

.

-

.s BD 1

)

u* ,

.- + .

. . . .% .

. *

, , .. 6 . _ -

' *

. . <

O O.

N

.

.

9

%. j

. .. *e B . . > ..

...

. J.

..

.4... ... M. .t*...

. *..

..

stsM...... .....

....

. . . .

.... ..l. . . . . .. . . . .3

. ...

... . . . .,.

a... . .

.. ......

..-.

.l

....d. B.. . . . .

I

.

..W .> .

..

.__...______________________

.

.

..

.

.. ..a . . 1

... . . .............

.. .

.. .

. . . . . . . . . . . .

.

.

......~.e........

.

..

.

. . .. .

. .......

........-~~.

.

.. J...

.

.,

. ... ..

.

.......e .......

.....n..

~ .

.

.

.I. O I. ..

s .

.

-

. ,. .- l l y

,__~______________________

. .. . .............

> W ... .. .

. .....

...

.... N.M.-N ..  !

. ,1 N. .

. . .

3 04-

. .

i.

O .O i 2

0 .>h O

=

.

U ,94

. i . 4- .

. .X

.

" .

. __~______________________-

.. . . ........,.. ... . ..

.

u.

I n. 8.$ ...- .

...

......

~~,...l

,

>

,

iOI .

.l ..

..

= .. i

.a {

.. *.

. E .O ,

..

u i>t i

,

. .e 1

,

0 va= ...

. s. .

.

. __-______________________-

. .. .. ..............

.

... .........

.......

. ,. ,.

. . . .

. - ~~ ...

.

l k M - - N

> .O.

= .. .

. . . . .

E .wQ .

> jDE O s0 t l* 1

.i

,

,

o

.O .,_ _ ._. _ _. _. _. _ _. _ _. _. _. _ _. _. _ _. _. _. _. _. _ _. ,..

o

. . . .. ..... - 'D n,nn

- .. 1 .a D O so-n u . -- .I '

. . . . Oa < J.

u GS lD

-

.

.

19.2 .s.

, . ,

.

-

'

I

,

3 .

---

0 J /' s

.. .

. .

. ............

............

J- a tj mr d9 l

. . . . .

. . . . ....,........

.. . .....

. . . . .

z

...t . . . . > . . . .

.z 1 ..- ....

. c. . . . .

, . . . . . - ... . . . .

.z.o.u.du..d

..

,

,i

,

,.

. . . . . .

. . .

4

.

. . .O.a .z . ..

. -

.

.

.. 1.z.1 . . ...,.-.J.id....

. .

J

..

- . .

5 R -

-

.r

...

t .1

.

a

.oO.

511 -

v..o... .

.

O U

=

-

-

. >S. D t o . - 3 2 .u. 8.5 s.- .O..z 3 0.....

.

. .

W .

. >

.

3 Z

J3 O O V . .

.uk

. ..au. .

.

W 8 .

. O 2

D O tid .J W

>

. O .3 EOb u. O O z .2 .3 . .J r .

v. 7 k. 30& v. ....2.D

• J .v

> - . e. ZZ Isf .2 J e .I

.

U .Q O U > 0 - 0 .2 E E E 1 p. O I.k .Z

.

E. .

J JhJ -

.

.EuI ( p.t.

dr a, J . .J d . l O1 .

,/ --

.' . <\

- I (>'

w

.

, , .

.

.

a

.

'

,

'-r J u se . .

u. c. covento esotorment s waces av couMTV --

secr.ao oumaren se7e

• ascntawo couwir c'

.

- - . - . - - - _ _

-I

~

....----......

No. or i CoveReo ..............................--....................-..:1...

CoveReo ..-.*

• shoustav i nepontswo I ene con aan.

a a CoveReo i 4 average teeK'.V I emp rom mar. I emp rom June I forat waces I wases

- -

- - _ -_ 1__.usars..__1 --

__1 __..__-_1......- 1 ._...._-_.'.... 1- " " """

aLL twousrates..............I seal 3.7731 3.soel 3. seal sv.7 o.est i etss.'or I i I i i I ALL aavenumeur..............I sol esti esol esse i.ess.esa i ase.ea reocaat covrawmeur........I at tal t al tvl so.7s: I **

svare covrauwemr..........I al all eat eal nas.co? I **

Loc =L coveanneur..........I 278 esel eval esel .7as.vos I a ss.t e i I I I I I rasvare covenace............l seal 2.saal 2.e7el a.assi s. ras.ees I tr4.es i 1 l 8 I i ~

assic.. roa. s rasnswo....I el 3sl 378 331 as.sa? I s ae. 7 misswo....................I l 68 al vt 13.747 8 **

consrauctiow..............I sel asts is71 tell ass.sse 4 ate.oo mauvractuaimo.............I 331 essa vast osel a.ase.eae Fooo s mtwo. paoos......I .I Ste.**

asl tar t tail seal aza.tas a 2ea.es appaa. s ornee raeanc...I si assi aevi L en. c w ooo Paoos. .. . .. . I al rati ees.ee2 l **

tota e78 tosi att.see l tar.oa pero. s puettsH. INous..I 34 set

.

sal sol F7 142 I tes.es stone. Clar s glass Paool El 21 28 PR a m. mFTal Nous.......I 28 1 7o2 l **

l Essi assl tsel es?.9ee I **

mach. stEC. eleC.I......l 21 7sl Tel 745 ELec. macnner. s route..I 2te.tso I **

reaNsp.

I tsel seal asel aa7. sos I **

cause...........I at tal t al t st 70 438 8 **

measue.. CONTROL INsrR..l 18 831 141 tel 23 2ce l **

misc. urs. twous........I I at al Taaws. comm. eLec serv....I al s3 I **

178 tssi taal naal tea. Tat i wnotesate Teace...........I 37s.4o tal a238 asal azol ese.ser i too.ao RET 4:L TRaoe..............l noel asel 7t si 7231 eaa sas I s o?. oe .M A.D o 7 Nan. susun. acat est....I aos test scavices..................l sal lost teel sea.ea 7 I tes.ee neol sett eest oos.273 l 1- tet.sa 1 -- 1. . 41.......... .1 ..... ........:1.* _-

" " * *

. -

. e O c

~

m f,^g ,

i C

• O o

'

e-g u,

N EEJ

=aJ !

L

.

.

.

.. . .

. , s .

.

.

- . . .

.

,, '

,

,, , ,

,

-/ a ,

, , ,

, ,

,

'

s T

/

.sc f3 "gg" l b 5?

-

0

__

qac .,

c @ c ac o o d a.. a d+d.e. NC 9 w'1 e-. .e ggW8 . at c

,

<

-

V: t-d .

~4 .a Org .

.

u &m M- .

?n

~

-

c 4.S* 'l , l 1 I W.,mr F,yso i

,

a'

& -1 h Cc

. l o w  %  % oba o a

.' or w w m,.a

( o9~m9 . ,4n" 4 i rM a m e& -

~ n S :N l M s'>.

'

etr-t lWl

'

1 1

'd i ti O C ol0 t o o o e o q0l tjo. .a W 0101 V o

~'~

-

$cT - c e G- oo' m ( o 3 3 o

s s s.

5 o# .

e s g

-

y +s P - m. .

%

a _,l.-

-

..m

-

- -

w =

ew:, msq%o?v%,

.

.

.

s . rvtts

-

e w o y 4.~

%

m -x

%G e

)s_~% ~c -.q .

q%c q i .

. e wT-t y1 - mDe -

f h ars- m

&c' e

s!.fm hm%L(d e.c

=

- so*

of g

3 z

e e'd  ::3. N

,

,/ if f 3

a y . w g.

t-lg l 11 ri 1  :

o T

.

" '

% o q.3 aw

,

4 -

~1 aw a .

o o ci c v 1e 3 -

u (

. c @'Q  ;

-

,

,geg c.1 q% g

-

q C -i 0

,o

- 'l 9' _=.

-J

• 2 5 g e

1 c f4 &" I

I a'l a d uddco a 3

- s y M a c e,

-

c E.

cn c E

-

N-O <

d o G -q b o

.S O b

-

c

'1 hS c' W3 S .,1-d1 tM

(>

-

g

\. %v - 4

' r - .5 .-V -

~~

4-

d o 0 -

e n c'o l 2

, .

-

cjf .~ CC ^ '4l c e c, o ;,

c Os s

.

>

,,33 c g

$ .;m%E oc oJ r

C ys ,e p 2 q .

,

,e g 5 Q tvM '%g <t - ,

.

N o

-

I  :.- - ,

a c,

.

q- -

d<

- .

O a e  %

O 4i >':'.N C g e*=

,

.- a"'

h A()e Q

- N o

CC.

- - - '

s:- ,

%

- - -

" .:. '[

% c'ce @

s ,a

!o h' d c Q os cr o e c,. e ol..cQcce- 2Wr S o;;; o :. ,e M W s- l

=

I

= m w ~

e e-M - -

-

n

'-

'T]

A @  !-

P iD?

O d ce cco c co

-

n g

.

e N;

u d -r U.s

-

M s-

,c

%

n.

%

s .%.5

.c

+

%

.

m w ; O C -, -

m -

o q q O. j c o

'

k .; ' -@- $

>

' c co a c c ,de r. -

p 'd,e.

c ll 5 b c .

~

2 cic 5

'

? @ k* d i

,

.j 4 2

n 5 N i. 2 i

a

}

l o,

.c v O J

e t w z ca

=.(

m a o r) ,

E Y'

.C

- ) O o,, I. .

a.s

-

)

c ~

..

.

w 4 e 6 a J I c .o: u. u w 4 o o v. s s a s o s vi 'O d' $

~

w e G Ir = . m o F ' k e'

O. . z  : - w m . -

k

-

e- a c a e' ,

3, o a

.

-

ir v .

w e z a > -mv @-

c -

O o

v

.* -

o -

o a o a 4J w u..v

>,w J s

4 i

C 4

J 4

&,

o O a c =>

=:

., \

,i

'e

-

O b W O, ' yi ,\

i I 3 4 O W O 2

u. o 2

c. .s . a. v s - w 4 O - n p .

w L.) #\ 4 O ,J Vh F z a O r ,C -  ;

a e

• w a

.

4 l l. J Q 4 : > Q a w

• lv ,eJJ O 4 Y v

a K

-

=

• C 2 @

o w O Q. w 0 .c z w z a -

.

- - v - 2 2 , 3 w

'

y wz C -

4 6 b J v v o w w o - 0 . en -

e e s > -  : >  : -

[ o , - v 4 -

4 C L v4 -

-

• 4 w

-

e o s o  ; .:. a .- - -- 2 e =c .: .o > ;z C 4 g E @e e o -c - 4- w I lid a ;2 0

c v v o d O d 3 4 w 0 z s -4 Q Z -

.c .a

_. .

a o a a c v c s.,  :

• u

>

v -

4 a

6 m ws e w

'

.I v - v - -

i vo .  : _

e z c or r & 2

.; b 4 z a w * .s J en .

a w 4 i., o * - q w of a v > 4'v 14 .-

C . w J .O 4 v - 4 = w . 1 C O o a ,

O 2 1.f 4 E C v >

2 v & 1 s .5 J w v J o

B o a o v -

L.

-

w z 2 O a a  %

te, -

m. C C 2 -

w e  : a ri v-4 - -

e E e in a e

.( w rL b b v 3 m - w 4 S. - v 4 - s w v z in

i. l u o

• 4 wz  : .c  :. 2 0 > w -

.- 2 et w .:-

2 z  : a i

c

-

4 e w

!

• z I *z OJ

• x v s z f 4 e u :

s.

E s>z*e 2 w v s a 2 4 01  :

o O w 0 x & k e

-

a w

I e

w 4.

a .' -: 4 e e .o 0x -2 w a i, >

e c v o w na z 6 e- .a a a c. v a

> E 4 o in z > Z w R 'O 4 4 2 0 m O J 4.3 O E La- 2 L.J >- Ca.% C *~ 3 ' - * 'J f ; .a2 n 3*

c .- vn,nc e(t w

4 O v .-

- 4 (g 4 v w I A.,,b s - - .

T ,.  : i= y. a, ';n .,

s e

i 5 -a - s

= . m a- n a .c

.-

o--

o,~--

..

m m =m.,m

o. ,n a -

r..~. n.

.

--

c< ,-. c a m ,v  ; .

a n e ,- c - m c1

.

n a D .,1 gg ig-t3 C s t a -

a a v .c .o - w w w - + 4

.s =- =s w =- e e e

,

e f.

o e a e e , gL - .g e

> w v w w w w O Q

- l ,- O u O , ,

v Ci* CC, f) ' j. ) J 2

,

j

.M ,,,

v v 3 4

.

L.s *J 4

,

l  ! '

m ,2 5.'

b

. ,. i

. i e  % .

.

t

. s .. .

.

_

.

<

<

st se .'J, og 4

,a ' . . ?.

u ,

h> m o I,.J aw- -

I bQ ( C C 1

,

'

• O Qg o o Ch e r1 C ( (1 - O (1 C"

-'

h,'._Ml'CQC

'

'

Jhv "

FQ <!.

• )

-

cew ,a -

} g t' f

~

hM l l t'

G" er a 4 '

o4 r-no c

-

oN n AT ewo o-da oi g4.>o ku i

n

]hy  ; .suf 2  ; ms ,c . - T i 7 i

- a3 1 cd l l .

1 i l cc 9 2 9e t d t

@Ec " O 0 0B t Ds Nd e,

q 9e 9 D C % N sQ '

qC C t

% h C N 4s DE

,

>

m3 o '

N.  %

d QQ g --

'

t

• rd N

m P,  % {

> 9

~

5  :

5 ~

- 5 m i

, n L (C '. C L L ~ k '- G

• 4

>

o L C n O Lf'.

c,.cQ"-*e

'

a 4 C (

q C C L , e' G

C '! L .

" O 'f"w[  ;

s

<

,

J e-40 ]w 7 q

'l e

s s

4 9lP m n dJDO  :

h u. naq 9 cfc NN n

t An n o v r. W w lx w dd A w DD \f b W 0 ,f d -:.dLC gg a

'

l a

'

cq

-

$

-

r E- 0 g l f. f

'

0%

N lY .x ;r- t

• u r 00 o  !

,1 N

%

OS,C O c o><- , o c S, 9<to c .1  ;

t I

! f dst s

>

m- :r %e <(

p o

n e s '

.".,,,

c'"

rt ,

%.

r t D '' M

-i hj $,

(

o oC OC l

'

C e k x nh 9

• ma w.

ln m ~ 4 g

- e c .

.

- c9 *q c o o o cc Wy.

-

'

s1 o ec o o ,,

q q 0 o w

h C

$

I W

• C mM C to  % " eb  !

g o n -

a  % s 3

" 4

^ V4 &

N C r

mn .

Q ,

d q e J

-

R b r O C C OC G t @Ilhc C E .

u$ :" o e' c, c

" -

s sc e f

~

l

ne

-

' .w.e '

O

-

%-

'

6 a rm  %  %  %

l

.'

d s

^$

, .C c d C C O C e n n '~- n c e c Os ]'

• t V

• 5

% 3 5

j,&.

'

\ $- 0

~J N f &# h  % t' J

%

S r h ~

( -

z 4

.

>  % = tm  % ,,,

%s) ->

-

% '

O e a 2

.

,-

< v, w < f r-) m< \-

'

') N l > -

O o J z

,

a w l) t

• W & J l s

2) .

w w I O '

=C m.( l l ll

• 0*

O W > u w a

>= b Q\ j . o -

> a b O s a

• a e

"' ~

I I s m w 4 w 4 o 6 J >

O' ], h) g e

.

p e -

O a

m

>

a A

1 0 o u o

z O O e

>

e C

-

as es a w f - p O

• v e O a -

a w o >

m ( w &

• 2 D > - w a a

• z =

U; - u

• 0 & a c 2 u J

• -

O i -

s a a w

• a - 0 0 u 1 0 - w e W]* k

- p u s o e 4 D

-

tL  ? - E a O p = o a O E 4 -

,,,1 -

w g OO a e > t) a b a s w a kl > w J

• m - J sr u v > w e C 3 4 0. a o O ad 4 o s - w g e  : 3 J w z w w .tl A O E 4 -

a a e a > s J >  ; wm 4 E o -

J O > <

p-(

> e w 6 o 4 s u W&

w M

-

O - 4

>

u o b ab a4 w uI w 2

-

>

a 2 O >

y 0 w a a e O A w O .is 4s z o I w s

-, e e

a

> =v w e-w ati

- z z

>

w g

w 3 s- O

'

g > v e -

1

• z - 2 , o a s > - - in o e - c - 7

u. z in w

• a z en a 4 0 > v e O s O s e .e k w z I > - 1 vi o C ae > > -

a .O > z4

_J 4 r. Q o 6

o ed 4 e

O O z o en als3 w s

• w 0 I >w I

u I e -

> o .,

O z -

-

I .e4 - a: e E w

-N .:o I O u

a ow

.le 3 4 m z

w o -

o4 .>

-

w m. 2 C w ad a v

• a m w X s 6 y6 v0 w =

z

> a a w z.

b u a w o > -

> e v I 0 s w ..J .6 * > s en w _

c 1 o o z o

• 6 o 2 w 4 a O u  :

w v s it V v = 4 ~ w I

e a Q 3 z 2 v w & ab e ed -

O w

• d = =2 e v 2 > w e

.g e = z o S,

m 3 a : > w = a, >- 6 4 - s n *m e -

a a > -: a e v z a e = w - a 2 z > s

• w > v v s 2 e, z z a w u z wl  % a 0 - 4 w z a m zc s > w ~ ; z oe a w a G -: e z w 4 o a 0 x a 6 - w

- - -

fs,, ' -

v. I er z 2 2 s a 4 m 4 I o w 4 a z w p a -2 z e o -z a > w w -

-

z r z w g > ; o 6 e a ; 3

• a

• O s a a 0 .6 w r

• aa w a g e o ae z w c o o u O o

/% e . O w 1 '. o u 3 : a c e L o a k : w r c iz " 3 '

• O f 7

. Eity " 1 i

• '

% o ; ., ; f c - - - - - - - - - $ - - - - - -

o 3 2,

L

, 3" u

w

]e *o-'s

• ""'# # #

, s O N C '0  % "e .*s w a n .s a I T2 C N kn C4 r~.f) -Q. 4 t'. 'C

~ a r- <ra a w z ca w w w w w ww o - 1 O ~~

> a a : .sn - w .n ~.. " ~~ *~ " *s- L - e 7 C4Q C w z .

== w w w ~w w w .- w w w w . .

- 4 H

,

v v L

- g g 4ad v -

'

O' V' O' r' G' O' Q' IL %c C '& -1 .-

e 4 w ..m .s .7.se e y .v. 4

as

/; . , . ..

,5 I i

. < /

, *

.. . . . - - ._

.. ._

. .

.s e 2o .

- i .s s a

$$ m

'

8 .4 d 000 d <fJ tt 9 9 '

• ii *T

'3 (9 M ""

7 6 i

}

.

hh. i. O ,

! I1

• I ""l "*!g'-aV dl l~l3

%

!

3  ; ag gqg s 3 p'

~

pc s prw +

2 a  ;  ;

!

o e"J8 o mS e o oo 9 o os c uo s c a t ,i

-

a Ar#r#

r ea s s

>ms

+ N "mR x#l w

-. - -

~

QN o & 4 o E

t w> ,

% _

w t.

b  %( U ni M&w Sd

• N N N hhM $

I v .s o %s :r w q z i k k p u

-

< s Q L ( ( Q e) s : ~

l (l v' C

~'

> I

> OCt3]C o'N C

cr -- -

~L 9- -- W_

~

- . ET#  ;

' [

E' k

- *

$ O g & It

] ,

1:5 <

% s.

' $ 5

.

g z )

.

z S9:

pp'; 4-y [ ce 0 /l

-

c cc c-- ,,,

d D

5, w C o c ocq g

}g t y T

. ,,., .

5 q Q V Y ~' , 0 ~'

m f ac -

~ l aS.qO *kL

'

9 c c c G O U

& > Q

• 0 c . G C c F

.

Q

_) e

$ GG r-

'

P' 4 00 *

%

-

C 7

U

% -

-

,;

c-eg. e

-

.

- 0 ~

=

~ O ll

,

,

"

' '3 O C d c C c ,O C

e. ra y ,- o 7 ' *f.) K V M O VDD

~,

'N a C' 'i'

'

N. '

-- '* 'z' e WN % g g-

'

a e ,. O' k' **  % F @  ;< s '

4

-

,

4 C

4 e  % e i

• e-

!

3 a ~ , ,

f

.

w ,

• l  :, h, 3.- CO 3 Q Cr. o 7 t o O c 0 0 C e n i I

• . -

g -

W- q y m

y et y ,

~ c

> ~

d

r

% , '

w E a y ? w ' ,

> i v -'

'

A b s

'

1[ > c O g Q, O Ce t !- C h t t3 I g 8 h l.': S 2 -'

'r c 7 >e N. 6 p$ "

tr- 2 $ C '

f7 6 x v g- - e t^ o -

o-

-

--

s d Q* , ,. a s*- C C '

i 5 G3s CD  ;

C C o ,A P

_ , 5 2

e~ '

c a t e 7 & .'; ~

n  % O f,

- -

g

% d n L 4 V % ~ y  ?  : c ~ ~ v ~ -

@

• v 3 -

-

oo

. }

-c u

• w a

J) 4 4

$

E [

1 AO [, '

e "fl oo J z L 2 6 YW '> O $ v e O o - w 3 e s h N, s di o . a e > & v k O i

4D ~ + e-' j9 [*

e \ e E $ O e w 4 w 4 .1 te. e > $

3) l .\ \, w e m - O

-

O. .a

-

-

o e

c. > v

- , .z, e u.

-

,n e

.

.

w

.. w i

i .

n' s - e e O = z o - O. a. s

i. - s - z - a w o 2 l

w j $u 1 ;V T

& a 3 w en 3 - o O v z 0 - i e Q k o- . P.- a e au V La L.4 \ - ' -

w o O a e a > 3 v #

o 3 - v s O a ar u se 4 4 8

-ud sN e

>

w v e o a = 0 e o a 0 6 a s w = w a .a ., u

.- a e e - s r s w w .s ,41 c. 4 * -

4 a o s w m. >>o 3 a

< o e. w a a o - <z

• -

>

a 2 > Q O A O. a w 0 s 1 e

> 3 w, w

< a

>

a

> w

-4 .

>= 4 w 6 s y v v 0 6

-

4 s w

-

r w o - %

eo w x w ets s

< z. u

,

. -

is

- . v v e g z z a e

3

• e

'

a z - u a

4 m e

-

o 4 1 u z - 2 o e a r - -

e %v e - g - u

'

u 0 W 4 g at O O s O s e =z w z y >

.,

.1 - z

.J O o o O e D en > > 4 - P w ta h - 1 e(

p La. O eM 4 O O d 3 4 w O 1 1 4

• O z -

s 3 w 1 % et O I e .'s a o, O P z is g

.i.

z C w 1 w u > v 1 ee a K O U V w 3 i > w v - O >

3w w e 2 4 s at en v a s w o - - w e e v - 4 a o x- s e 7i ve e z > s 4 *

z o o z w < a O v a > < v s o s w s .a < q - , z e s a w z :

a( w C > b 4 E Q 3 z a > er v les  %

• Es .d ., w y s g y . e - w } O } C o O 4 z Q 3 aw J 8* ha 4 w - w 4 - J 68

• 4

• 5 I > = 0 w d 4 e z en v z > w z qH ,

- a w *

• u u s 2 a. 2 z I a w v z 6 a O > a w 2  : a e o z r e 4 w - e z - a h' el P

• 1 I s e 4 L U 1 a 0 - O z w 4 0  ; O M & & - w P o ( e- z- *2 zo s 4 w -

O z e I 2 1, a w a - : o 6 4 . a 2 -

e 4 0 s a u o o w a

• a x w a = v z a > w w .4

, p u 4 C w 2

• O v 3  :

• OJ 6 e aL L .- i., p- -

1 z La 4 a a v 4 c A o - o an

= * >

I - w o e' O v oo

,

.", s

~ "

a z s a w $ 6 - a a a a a + a O a -- a- - - -- Y "" U

[ I 3 0 - w E. o s e

.

a n = < <

o  :. e "o c' -~

~ ~ n w w n e,

-., c ~ .q n

O ~ eO

~ ~ ~

so e

~

q n e s- ,- m

-

c ~ e

- - -

.,

.

i.

a o 6,

>

. y } w

-

w w w -i w w == w e

.e.-

. w w . =~.- .~-=~=w

. w y , y if g.u. gy

.

w

,

.

.z. y e e e e s e ca. . .g p v O L t.J U e 4 e - C 0 C O O AO

,  ; n -

- a.* u se ~ c it ' c- -

n --= -- H H .-

I

( ' l' o' L , f$ v

.- ,. . .

,

.

. 4  % .

,

. .

< 1 up <

'

ec .

,

.

Qa 4

a,

.

g 6# .7

- > <n e 44 *= vs o cocoac

.a

f ac, no co a CO c c ,

. 1 m -

n -,-

n; a ac ~

n -

ef&so a

b . o

.

.

<

a ,.

QG V a.d.. .a

-

%*

h -n a.. Q k CJ

-

D

' v' %n C

%

e  !

Ud 00 0 C c 0 I

.

g

- ya@

y ip o

V'4 e n

'r s s 4

e n e N N

,o wqw 0 ,c nc g g. g o

m 6 . . , .

-

..

b %g  %

_

--

~. ,\ s* r.

e QN c e%.fDm w

%

%.

~ 7 g*J%m@ t .

. e y#" r. 9 mne e%

o

• >.

-

t ,s.

J w

in y&

k,

.

J 4 Ul m o.

.

o

-: ,m. 2 5

.3 o % '

g% o. - oNm

.Ci-go m V. D-O'

" .e. "4 ^.-

d % a,uM'O

- *

• 3

. o M' a.  :$

m'tc f0 --

M to J -. r

Ye 2 9 9 I

"

4 y >

,

,, k bb

'

5 f . i "

5

. .c

?

% M a

-

i- y Cc _- O C C rJ d WO O *

2 g

m 3,

u

,i c e

c y'c

,

QCm D 't n n

J fl ,

~

%

g,

-;7 rw .:

4 Cy

-r 'J1 -

.

i en c r0

- -

l

-

o

>

I  %

dp g i u

'5

5

• q' t

>

&,ar y g$

7e

>

f oc oen O

r f

oc 3

w

,,

m o

b o,

C a

e

~

• O C C

• ne MY _

eO

C

-

-

,

! .i '.

C ~'o % "

CQ

• o C a  %

csiv d, d w g

4 m C D0 o o. -',

• =::=

c o a s M%'%

Nd ')

- l

'

>

4 t

% o ,

'

u _ _

[

f

'

%, w 9h 4 eis

~

- ,

es

,

C C @ ~

'Q w-- -

-

[

V (,1 O g, O [. ** C l E "

2 h &c g j }; g.~ [ h [2 0 ' "

F - "2 j

l. g 1 p (- -

[-i

/'

-

u -- i -'

>

m - -

J g b bD C a Cp' e

y c5 0 P'? o Kcm :m

~;

'

t '

W,7 5_

8

-

b *C F%

?

_ _

e

%

.

=

N  ? -

.

• mw O

.: 5 -

4

.; Oi - --!

l

'

,

d C.

)

.

"l q

,

3 ,

o or

_

2 UC c t o d '

c  ; s 3 00 3

,

4 yd bQ U U ** p c C)

C ES d O

-l my '1 ,-

- - g

' #

E g 9"I T '

c r 3, d - ' '

iz

,

i< v Si a < >-

fa u oO

. E J z

.g: 4 e A >

. c w w E O O k> i.s > u n.s a O O s - w 3 a e N J i O a a e > & v 4 O er - O e a 4 O e w 4 w 4 e k a >

J e e -

a > CL 0 W I O O > -

tJ w > 0 e u e 0 a - e 4 e O 4 e w tw - .4 - u en o a 2 3 > w ta s > -

Z = a t O >

Q a a 3 w an a - O O v Z O - w en k u . H a c A u w I O O a f* 4 > 3 U O 3 - O a O E 4 - U J v 4 4 t.3 p.

v a

> 61 a

e e

O O 4 O2 a

• a **Z J w a O L.J =W

(

4g g O k W O a

CL 4 s w

- 4 A

.e '

.8 *=

V J

1. J

-

4 ts .

m 4 =3 J sr u 3 0

.g O 4 4.r 66 M C 4 2 > a a a > *) LeJ e 4 E ,d

.J O > 45

> 4 ins L s u u - > - a 2 - V e O 4 w O 4 s - it u w > > w J n g > w 4 - u O k 4 e w I w O > O w I w 4 2 u * *v 4 .'.! Z 2 a 1 *

, U 4 a a en a =L o

• 1 u 2 - 3 O a s > - - e d >e in -

s.4 (4 q - w u o

_a o 0 o O O e o -s >

• w O 4 -

• w O u s c _e e e i. - is e r> 1 . - 2 i g . k $ el.l 4 eB 3 4 1 1 4 e Q 2 e s  ; e.g 1 g ( { g ed g g) .y > 2 g

• w 4 2 4 2 O w s 1 w u e U -

I e6 4 4 e 2 O U O w w > w v -

d 2 v a .J w O > -

W =5 a V > 4 h O *h w X - ed s(6 U ;/) w e Z > s e L* 2 O o 2 w 4 a U J > 4 U N O N s w 4 > 2 e

?

< w

,;, e., z s e-e 4

y a a

s

.a 3

- w z a > < a u w w - w 4 - J L

e

-

.

t .RI s J

w a a 4

v s a jI -

o u . 4 J

~ w w

1 c s 4 1

b o o Z .

• 4 - 4 - > - O w 4 e v  : > w zo g= '

- a w >

• x v s z c z z 1 m w v : 6 a O r 4 w z 1 e o av  : a e- z. w - 4 z z

• s en 1 > Z 1 I s a 4 e u a a A0 -

m 2 w 4 0 2 D O N & 4 - w

• i  !- - P 2 i,) s > w - L J 4 pm w 2 > a w a *- 3 O k 4 a 3 3 a

• O J a a L O w & 4 m I w a 2 2 4 O 2 a > w .eJ **

O v a O .s k e a 6 2 > A g z 6 F C. A v r

g

,

-

4 0

'

e, y a 1 4 i .  ;

3 m

2 3

2 e - - - - -- -

Le

- - -

g e - -

as

- - - -

4

-

_'

a

*o -

v ~

v a .e 3

I -

'- m w o .w 0 e f' y a.

v aO

' ' - -

O -

>

1 w w (L s

.s. (

s o o 2 -r N

ir N N F o ice s'

,- r, oN WNN reN  % a < - - - - - a- e , a u w . g 4.

2 eg w

- - - - - .fr -

8#

- -

fr fr

- -- -

N

-

N

-

N t=. .G 4t P-4 (h

.7

&

ir P4 e,

S a cw e

z J **

- t.s v sJ L 64 u o. e e e e e e 4 -

4 >

4 4 l ' s- C O C C i g , g i i :s t r."_. E -"

N - ._.

i i i. , '. .

I 10 '

l

e 5 M,ebau.gan Gounic, pept..of gotial fer6 ices

-

COURT MOUSE ANNEX - 1900M i84 /

'~

JOHN E. LUSSERS, OrRECYom DIAL 459-3200 SHEDoYGAN. WISCONSIN 53081 August 8, 1979 Mr. Michael Nathanson Argonne National Laboratories Building 10 Argonne, Illinois 60439

Dear Mr. Nathanson:

This is a follow-up to our phone conversation late in July when we discussed the environmental impact of building a nuclear power plant in the Sheboygan area.

You are interested in what impac. approximately two hundred construction workers could have on a community lika Sheboy-gan. My feeling is that the most obvious impact would be upon housing, particularly rental units, which are already in short supply. Also, this kind of worker of ten brings a house trailer and there could be problems in that area be-cause of local township zoning requirements, and so forth.

Depending upon whether the majority of these workers would be single or not, I would surmise that there also could be problems in the area of law enforcement and police services, given the fact that these people are " nomadic", and often do seek much of their recreation and spare time activities in

' local bars and taverns.

Those are the two areas that come to mind that could be affected.

If you have any questions about this, I would be happy to discuss them with you.

V .y truly y rs, 4

J E. Lubbers, Di.ector Sheboygan Co. Dept. Of Social Services JEL:ekl 076 100

. .

. .

VfMNON R rot'CMMANN

'""D*'

ea .:

• e s a. RON ALQ C MIKOLiC

• ftlGENE '#

_

. .L. . P . a t i L SON

_

"

-

/

. . . ... ...T m. 3.... s

.

I- 7 1 misHHylitilli t.1-Q }7}2f)O)U;G(UL5?"+hs".,;"x"&$--.9

,) n - -

- -

0101h

, . . a .4 ,4 .= . er, m .o ..u n ,mw~ .m

.

.

OrFICE OF 3HERIFF p< ora es .u i t anLA CCDE 414 July 27, 1979 Argonne National Laboratories Building 10 Argonne, Illinois 60439 Attention: Mr. Michael Nathansons

Dear Mr. Nathansons:

Following is the statement you requested concerning the law enforcement problems as they relate to the proposed nuclear construction site at Haven.

I believe that to say an influx of 1,300 to 1,500 construction workers in a community our size is no problem, would be an understatement. I do not believe, however, that the problems are insurmountable. Housing in our area, especially rental property, appears to be at a premium. However, real estate, while rather high, is not out of line compared to other areas if purchase is considered. I am assuming that many of these employees may commute from Port Washington, Fond du Lac, or Manitowoc , and therefore, I believe housing should be available.

Traffic patterns in the immediate area may need some modifications.

The site is readily accessible through the use of CTH LS (old STH 141), present STH 141, and it is anticipated that I-43 shall be extended well beyond Sheboygan, if and when construction commences. Our departanent has had considerable experience in the last 20 years with traffic in the Elkhart Lake area during three weekends a year when Road America draws spectators and participants from throughout the United States. These events draw from 15,000 to 45,000 people each weekend and has not caused us any serious problems.

We discussed on the phone possible social disruptions. Here again, I see no major upheavals in our society locally. One potential trouble spot during construction would be the possibility of a major demonstration by opponents to the project such as at Seabrooke. Any long, drawn out demonstration would MEMBEA

• 4."..... / ;

NM

. -

- .

Argonne National Laboratories July 27, 1979 Page 2 create a serious problem for local law enforcement. In Wisconsin, however, the statutes provide for mutual aid in which one county or several may assist another on a temporary basis. It is anticipated that for short term duty, we may be able to muster between 200-300 police officers from surrounding communities.

In closing, I have had conversations with law enforcement officers from Manitowoc County during their construction period of the Two Creeks plant and have been informed that there appears to be no insurmountable obstacles as far as law enforce-ment is concerned. Be advised that if you desire any more information and/or in greater detail, do not hesitate to contact this office.

Sincerely,

/ ,, . ,, ,, _ ,' I f,/ / '&

n. ""

Vernon R. Boeckmann Sheriff - Sheboygan County

,.. ,, co 102

. .

.~...e. . .

.

CITY OF

.

i i ll

• g ll SHEBOYGAN FALLS, WISCONSIN 53085 b # '"

, .e M 375 BUFFALO STREET PHONE: 459-3191 CORBY D. FELSHER GLADYS M. MORKEN CITY CLERK MAYOR July 31, 1979 "ichael Nathanson Arcoine 'Tational Lakoratory Building 10 Arcoine, Illinois 60h39

Dear Mr. 'iathanson:

In resconse to your question regardine the ability of the City of Shehoygan Falls to handle the potential population crowth expected because of the Haven Power Plant. The City of Shebovean Falls is presently reviewing plans for the addition of 250 esidential lots within the corporate limits of the city. The potential areas for

.

annexation and further residential crowth are really unlimited.

The city presently has a 150 lot mobile hone park with aanle room for expansion.

I reali::e that I cannot speak for the rest of Sheboyean County, but as for the ability of the City of Sheboygan Falls to handle any possible population crowth because of the Haven Power Plan *,

it is quite evident that the city would experience no problems with regard to providine areas fo- buildinc and elocation.

"

Very truly yours,

'

_

Corby D.' Felsher City Clerk-Treas.

CDF/lo D T a b SI o

T

~ -

~iD FF0 o Jd j fj _1 A a

7g 103

. .

.

CITY O F SHEBO GAN WIS ON SIN TREECITY USA RICH ARD W. SU$CHA. MAYOR DOI CITY HALL July 31,1979 Mr. Michael Nothonson Argonne National Laboratories Building 10 Argonr.e, Illinois 60439

Dear Mr. Nathanson:

In your review of the proposed Haven nuclear site one should consider the impact on the City of Sheboygan which is a short distance away. The city would be able to abso6 a few hundred people either on a permanent or temporary basis during the construction period. Furthermore, any increase in employees after construction could be accomodated without any undue stress on the services we provide.

We have a tight housing situation here insofar as oportments and single family units are concemed. Our yearly housing starts overage 150 which is about all local contractors and the availability of land con handle.

Our employment rate is now 2.6% and may very up to 3.5% which is considerably less than the national overage.

The city has one mobile home site available on the south side and no other sites within the city limits are available. I believe the Village of Cleveland has a mobile home park with sewer and water available.

Any traffic could be accomodated by 1-43 and the town roads and would not directly offect the City of Sheboygan.

Respectfully,

^^ .

Richard W. Suscha, Mayor RWS/ic

-

TOh ol b

. .

Sheboygan Falls Public Schools e 220 AMHERST AVENUE JOHN F. BROWN SHEBOYGAN FALLS, WISCONSIN 33083 Adm.niswa, en offices sunriorendono PnoNE su . sst.ssu August 23, 1979 Mr. Michael Mathanson Argon National Laboratory Building 10 Argon, Illinois 60439

Dear Mr. Mathanson:

I am writing this letter in response to your phone call concerning the affect of the Haven Nuclear Power Plant construction crews and the possible affect on our school enrollment.

You have indicated there could be a possible 1500 workers for a period of four to five years, if the Haven plant is constructed, which may mean an increase of two hundred students in the area.

The Sheboygan Falls School District has had a gradual decline in enrollment and therefore classrooms would be available in the district. We have four available elementary classrooms in the Waldo Elementary School and two available classrooms in the high school. We feel that the Sheboygan Falls School District could absorb up to one hundred fifty students without any adverse cost or affect to the local taxpayer.

Since I am no prophet, it is difficult to know whether the present conditions would prevail five years hence, since we have noticed that our enrollment decline is tapering off.

Sincer.ely , 7

!/

, J

no 4 l' /l h

.,, e w John F. Brown Superintendent of Schools JFB/pv

.i \0 q!o -

. .

CITY of M A NITOWOC WISCONSIN 54220

.,

,

s ~

OFFICE OF M AYOR [ D?

ANTHONY V. DUFEK @ M August 14, 1979 Mr. Michael Nathanson Agronne National Laboratory Division of Environmental Impact Studies Building 10 9700 South Cass Avenue Argonne, Illinois 60439

Dear Sir:

In r- "

phone conversation this past week, I submit the fol

'

3 e t" of 1. , Wisconsin is located on the west bank of ike '. . 'igan,' . -

.imately seventeen miles from the proposed c - ' --

e and has a population of 33,000. We are an

+ -

..

'

. . *a adequate housing including apartments, one

' ' '

<

/ nomes, and trailer parks. It would be my determina-

'

could accommodate, without strain on any of our city a -

cems , several hundred families who might be employed cc . project. With a declining school population an in-

. lux 4'001 children would not affect our present school capacity on city services.

T1 - 1, ve for your information.

.ly yours,

• 1 /

^~

-

ws,,,

,e a A*

,,

' ,

hony V."Dufek

'

. 'or AVD:eh OU

'\ ~

aI6

-

,

. v Warren Soeteber Superintendent of Schools Telephone 414 459-3511 ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES

• 830 VIRGINI A AVENUE SH EBOYG AN

• WISCONSIN 3 30 81 August 3, 1979 ,

Mr. Michael Nathanson Argonne National Laboratory Building 10 Argonne IL 60439

Dear Mr. Nathanson:

Reference is made to your telephone call of last week requesting information pertaining to the long range outlook of the Sheboygan Area School District and whether or not the district could accommodate enrollment of additonal students.

Dr. Jerald Schoenike, Director of Administrative Services and Chairman of the Long Range Planning Committee has provided the following information.

Should further information be required, please contact this office.

The 1972-73 enrollmentl of the Sheboygan Area School District was 11234 pupils.

Since then a steady decline in student enrollment has been experienced. The 1978-79 enrollment was 9439. It is projected that by 1982-83, 8211 students will be enrolled; 7631 by 1985-86.

If broken down by elmentary and secondary groupings, the data would appear as follows:

K-6 7-12 EC-5 6-12 1972-73 5277 5957 1978-79 4148 5301 1982-83 3401 5010 1985-86 3457 4374 The school district's current inventory of available classroom space2 is for 4374 elementary students and 5847 secondary students. In 1982-83 it is expected that space will be available for only 4079 elementary students. The reduction of elementary space will be accomplished by the projected closing of two small elementary schools, (Lincoln School and Lyman School) replacement of an elemen-tary school (Pigeon River School) and remodeling of an elementary school (Maple-dale School).

The inventory of space for secondary classrooms will probably remain at the current level although revisions in special education programming may reduce the inventory somewhat. A study is underway regarding the additon of space for physical education and vocational education at both of the senior high school facilities.

h

. w Mr. Micahel Nathanson Page 2.

Plans are being implemented for a voluntary early childhood program to be fully operational by 1982-83. It is estimated that this will add 200 FTE students to projected enrollments. Unknown factors, of course, may change this estimate. (Already included in the above table.)

Recent Board of Education action calls for implementation of an Early Child-Hood-5, 6-8, 9-12 plan or organization changing from the current K-6, 7-9, 10-12 plan of organization. The impact of this enange on facilities vill be to better utilize the secondary facilities to a greater degree and to make better use of the school district's capital imvestment. The ultimate result of this change will be an improved instructional program.

The district policy on pupil-teacher ratio is 20.8 pupils for each teacher on the elementary level and 21.0 pupils for each teacher on the secondary level.

The ratios do not include administrators, support staff (psychologists, social workers, guidance counselors, reading specialists, etc.) or special education teachers. We feel the ratio is favorable to good instruction. The school district has had no unique problems in obtaining professional staff.

An increase in enrollment for the duration of the construction of the Haven plant would not cause any difficulty in hiring additional staff. A problem may be created when tha construction is ccepleted and a major drop in enroll-ment takes place. Add 4 costs for unemployment compensation for laid-off teachers would be expected.

It would appear that the school district could absorb 400 students into the district with minimum difficulty. This would, of course, assume reasonable distribution of the students throughout the school district. If a temporary housing area (trailer park) is established in a single school attendance area, an elementary school may be strained unless transportation is arranged. Assum-ing reasonable distribution of students by grade, the district could absoro up to 700 students without major facility problems.

Recent investigations by the Long Range Planning Committee of the school district indicated a severe housing shortage in Sheboygan. If the sewage plant is fully operational, and if the Town of Sheboygan Sanitary District No. 2 is funded, it appears that adequate building sites will be available. However, the current housing shortage, especially low income, is expected to continue.

It is important for planners to recognize the relationship of other school districts to the proposed construction site of the Haven plant. The school districts of Howards Grove, Kiel, Sheboygan Falls and Manitowoc also have the possibility of absorbing an influx of students to the immediate area.

It would appear that the community with the most housing available would receive the greatest amount of students.

I h o1o

.

. ~

Mr. Michael Nathanson Page 3.

As one would expect, much of the above data are subject to the change. However, the information represents our best estimate at this time. The Long Range Planning Committee will be making a major report to the Board of Education in the fall of 1979 which may have some impact on your study. Please feel free to contact us for further updated data.

Sincerely, f

Q/ a a .m .,

, O .f..f~.,)

-

-

DR. WARREN SOETEBER Superintendent new l

Enrollment for the purposes of this letter is defined as full time equivalent (FTE). This means that a student attending school half time is considered .5 of a pupil. Example: Thirty kindergarten students attending school half-time would be counted as 15 students on enrollment reports.

2 Inventory of school space is based on a full-time equivalent basis, cc: J. Schoenike p ' j h,

. 1. s m =

.

SHEBOYGdit mEmORidL OSPITAL 2629 North 7th Street e Sheboygco. VAscensin 53081 e Tel (414) 457 5033 July 26, 1979 Michael Nathanson Argonne National Laboratories Building 10 Argonne, Illinois 60439

Dear Mr. Nathanson:

As a result of our telephone conversation yesterday, I am submitting the following information for your records. There are three general hospitals in Sheboygan County, two located in the City of Sheboygan and one in the City of Plymouth. Sheboygan Memorial Hospiral has a bed capacity of 250 beds, St. Nicholas Hospital operates with 185 beds and the Plymouth Hospital is a 48 bed f acility. Although we are in the midst of a major renovation project and Sc. Nicholas has just completed a totally new building program I am reasonably certain that none of the hospitals plan any change in their bed capacity within the next five years. Therefore in response to your question there should be no bed expansion in these hospitals in tne near future.

As f ar as orthopedic surgeons practicing in the area at the present time, there are six sho practice almost exclusively at the two Sheboygan hospitals. They are all on active status at the present time. Arrangements hire also been made for the addition of one more orthopedic surgeon who will be arriving in Sheboygan approximately October 1st of this year. Therefore before the end of the year we will have seven practicing orthopedic surgeons barring retirements and/or moves out of the community.

I hope this will provide you with all of the information which you requested. If anything further is needed please contact me.

Sincerely,

'

. .

,,

-

.

.- . , . .

James W. Scheel Associate Administrator JWS:df

-

)hb o!6