|
|
Line 3: |
Line 3: |
| | issue date = 08/30/2006 | | | issue date = 08/30/2006 |
| | title = 2006/08/30-Comment from David R. Lewis of Pillsbury, Winthrop, Shaw and Pittman on Massachusetts Attorney General'S Petition for Rulemaking PRM-51-10 to Amend 10 CFR Part 51 (August 25, 2006) | | | title = 2006/08/30-Comment from David R. Lewis of Pillsbury, Winthrop, Shaw and Pittman on Massachusetts Attorney General'S Petition for Rulemaking PRM-51-10 to Amend 10 CFR Part 51 (August 25, 2006) |
| | author name = Lewis D R | | | author name = Lewis D |
| | author affiliation = Entergy Nuclear Generation Co, Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc, Pillsbury, Winthrop, Shaw, Pittman, LLP | | | author affiliation = Entergy Nuclear Generation Co, Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc, Pillsbury, Winthrop, Shaw, Pittman, LLP |
| | addressee name = Jaczko G B, Klein D E, Lyons P B, McGaffigan E, Merrifield J S | | | addressee name = Jaczko G, Klein D, Lyons P, Mcgaffigan E, Merrifield J |
| | addressee affiliation = NRC/Chairman, NRC/OCM | | | addressee affiliation = NRC/Chairman, NRC/OCM |
| | docket = 05000271, 05000293 | | | docket = 05000271, 05000293 |
Line 19: |
Line 19: |
| The Petition's claims of new and significant information parallel those made by the Massachusetts Attorney General in the license renewal proceedings for the Vermont Yankee and Pilgrim Nuclear Power Stations (Docket Nos. 50-271-LR and 50-293-LR) and the Petition relies on and incorporates the contention and the supporting materials filed by the Massachusetts Attorney General in those proceedings. | | The Petition's claims of new and significant information parallel those made by the Massachusetts Attorney General in the license renewal proceedings for the Vermont Yankee and Pilgrim Nuclear Power Stations (Docket Nos. 50-271-LR and 50-293-LR) and the Petition relies on and incorporates the contention and the supporting materials filed by the Massachusetts Attorney General in those proceedings. |
| For completeness, Entergy wishes to direct the Commission's attention to Entergy's answers and brief in those proceedings (to which the Massachusetts Attorney General has replied) which explain why the Massachusetts Attorney General's 400448933v1 1FemploJ-ee&zL,7r5 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission August 30, 2006 Page 2 information is neither new nor significant. | | For completeness, Entergy wishes to direct the Commission's attention to Entergy's answers and brief in those proceedings (to which the Massachusetts Attorney General has replied) which explain why the Massachusetts Attorney General's 400448933v1 1FemploJ-ee&zL,7r5 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission August 30, 2006 Page 2 information is neither new nor significant. |
| See Entergy's Answer to the Massachusetts Attorney General's Request for a Hearing, Petition for Leave to Intervene, and Petition for Backfit Order (June 22, 2006) (ML061790134 at 14-25, Pilgrim; ML 061780616 at 13-25 Vermont Yankee); "Entergy's Brief on New and Significant Information in Response to Licensing Board Order of July 14, 2006" (July 21, 2006) (ML062080589 at 11-24, Pilgrim). | | See Entergy's Answer to the Massachusetts Attorney General's Request for a Hearing, Petition for Leave to Intervene, and Petition for Backfit Order (June 22, 2006) (ML061790134 at 14-25, Pilgrim; ML061780616 at 13-25 Vermont Yankee); "Entergy's Brief on New and Significant Information in Response to Licensing Board Order of July 14, 2006" (July 21, 2006) (ML062080589 at 11-24, Pilgrim). |
| The Massachusetts Attorney General's Rulemaking Petition requests (at 3) that the Commission "withhold any decision to renew the operating licenses for the Pilgrim and Vermont Yankee nuclear power plants until the requested rulemaking has been completed and until the NRC has completed" the related NEPA process that may be required by any amended rule. Entergy notes that the NRC Staff has tentatively scheduled issuance of the renewed licenses for both plants, if approved, by November 27, 2007 (if no hearing is granted) and by July 27, 2008 (if a hearing is granted). | | The Massachusetts Attorney General's Rulemaking Petition requests (at 3) that the Commission "withhold any decision to renew the operating licenses for the Pilgrim and Vermont Yankee nuclear power plants until the requested rulemaking has been completed and until the NRC has completed" the related NEPA process that may be required by any amended rule. Entergy notes that the NRC Staff has tentatively scheduled issuance of the renewed licenses for both plants, if approved, by November 27, 2007 (if no hearing is granted) and by July 27, 2008 (if a hearing is granted). |
| See www.nrc. gov/reactors/operatine/icensing/renewal/applications/vermont-yankee.html; www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/Iicensing/renewal/applications/Silgrjm.html. | | See www.nrc. gov/reactors/operatine/icensing/renewal/applications/vermont-yankee.html; www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/Iicensing/renewal/applications/Silgrjm.html. |
2006/08/30-Comment from David R. Lewis of Pillsbury, Winthrop, Shaw and Pittman on Massachusetts Attorney General'S Petition for Rulemaking PRM-51-10 to Amend 10 CFR Part 51 (August 25, 2006)ML062650221 |
Person / Time |
---|
Site: |
Pilgrim, Vermont Yankee File:NorthStar Vermont Yankee icon.png |
---|
Issue date: |
08/30/2006 |
---|
From: |
Doris Lewis Entergy Nuclear Generation Co, Entergy Nuclear Operations, Pillsbury, Winthrop, Shaw, Pittman, LLP |
---|
To: |
Jaczko G, Klein D, Peter B. Lyons, Mcgaffigan E, Merrifield J NRC/Chairman, NRC/OCM |
---|
Ngbea E S |
References |
---|
71FR64169, PRM-51-10 |
Download: ML062650221 (5) |
|
|
---|
Category:Legal-Correspondence
MONTHYEARML20183A1222020-06-30030 June 2020 6-30-20 Dismissal Agreement (DC Cir.)(Case No. 19-1198)(Consolidated with 20-1019) ML20063N0002020-02-26026 February 2020 2-26-20 Statement of Intent to Utilize Deferred Joint Appendix (DC Cir.)(Case No. 20-1019) ML20035C7762020-01-31031 January 2020 1-31-20 Entergy Entry of Appearance (DC Cir.)(Case No. 20-1019) ML20024D6912020-01-21021 January 2020 1-21-20, Intervenors Motion for Additional Time to File Reply (DC Cir.)(Case No. 19-1198) ML20016A3662020-01-10010 January 2020 Massachusetts' Opposition to Respondents' and Intervenor-Respondents' Motions to Dismiss ML19309E7632019-11-0101 November 2019 Intervenors' Opposed Motion for Extension of Time (DC Cir.)(Case No. 19-1198) 11-01-19 ML19303B3142019-10-28028 October 2019 Underlying Decisions from Which Appeal or Petition Arises (DC Cir.)(Case No. 19-1198) 10-28-19 ML19303B3162019-10-28028 October 2019 Docketing Statement (DC Cir.)(Case No. 19-1198) 10-28-19 ML19274B3432019-09-25025 September 2019 Petition for Review (DC Cir.) (Case No. 19-1198)- 9-27-19 ML13168A4732013-06-14014 June 2013 G20130461/LTR-13-0523 - Mary Lampert, Director, Pilgrim Watch, Et Al., Email 2.206 - Immediately Suspend the Operating License of Pilgrim Station Until the Provisions of EA-12-050 and EA-13-109 Are Fully Implemented ML12192A6182012-06-28028 June 2012 Ltr Margaret Sheehan Re Request to Reinitiate ESA Section 7 Consultation with Regard to Roseate Tern - Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station ML12181A5092012-06-26026 June 2012 Order Denying Petitions for Review ML12181A4902012-06-26026 June 2012 6/26/12 - Vermont Pub Serv V NRC Opinion ML12179A3152012-06-26026 June 2012 6/26/12 - Entergy Motion to Intervene in 12-1772 ML12172A3552012-06-18018 June 2012 Mass V NRC - 1st Cir 12-1772 - Mass Petition for Review and Court Notices ML12146A1592012-05-21021 May 2012 5/25/12 - Fed Respondents Post Argument Filing ML1211006992012-04-13013 April 2012 Order - Deferring Motion to Strike ML1211006872012-04-12012 April 2012 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice ML1211007042012-04-0909 April 2012 Order - VY Order Support Appendix ML1211004862012-04-0909 April 2012 Case Opening Notice - Commonwealth of Massachusetts V. USNRC ML12152A1062012-03-19019 March 2012 Entergy Final Brief ML12152A0802012-03-19019 March 2012 Final Respondents Brief ML1203004582012-01-27027 January 2012 Oral Argument Scheduled for May 9, 2012, Vermont Dept of Public Service,Et, Al., Petitioners V. USNRC, Et Al., Respondents ML11223A0642011-08-10010 August 2011 Letter to Senator Daniel a Wolf Regarding Concerns About the Safety of Extended Operating of Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station ML11133A3792011-05-0505 May 2011 E-Mail with Attachment from Susan Uttal, Esq. to Pilgrim Board Re Receipt of Letter from Coulter ML1105407332011-02-23023 February 2011 Letter from Annette L. Vietti-Cook to the Honorable Paul W. Hodes Re Director'S Decision 11-01 ML1101403242011-01-14014 January 2011 Certificate of Service ML1100503312010-12-29029 December 2010 Entergy'S Twenty-Second Supplemental Disclosure ML1033403302010-11-22022 November 2010 Entergy'S Notice of Filing Affidavit ML1032603012010-11-18018 November 2010 Affidavit of Dr. Nathan E. Bixler Re Board'S Questions from Board Majority on the Mechanics of Computing Mean Consequences in SAMA Analyses. ML1033403272010-11-17017 November 2010 Pilgrim Watch Memo to Gaukler'S Request for Citations and Copies of Specified Documents in Disclosures 6 and 7 ML1032103112010-11-11011 November 2010 Entergy'S Twentieth Supplemental Disclosure ML1030903772010-11-0505 November 2010 Email Pilgrim Watch Oct. 27 Letter Re Pw 6th and 7th Supplemental Disclosures and Transmitting Lyman Cv ML1030800762010-10-27027 October 2010 Response to Paul Gaukler'S Letter of October 20 Regarding Three Issues Raised, (Witness List, Sixth & Seventh Disclosures and Sworn Affidavit on 7th Disclosure) ML1030800772010-10-21021 October 2010 Supplement to Seventh Disclosure Statements by Pilgrim Watch ML1030000572010-10-20020 October 2010 Request for Pilgrim Watch Witness List and the Relied Upon Bases of Experts in Accordance with 10 CFR Section 2.336(a)(1) ML1030000582010-10-13013 October 2010 Pilgrim Watch Seventh Disclosure Statement ML1028501442010-10-0404 October 2010 Entergy'S Nineteenth Supplemental Disclosure ML1026302922010-09-13013 September 2010 Entergy'S Eighteenth Supplemental Disclosure ML1021502212010-07-29029 July 2010 Entergy'S Seventeenth Supplemental Disclosure ML1019305132010-07-12012 July 2010 Memorandum to the Participants Chairman Gregory B. Jaczko'S Upcoming Tour of the Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station and Round Table Discussion ML1019300282010-07-0909 July 2010 Email from Mary Lampert Regarding Commission Notification Relating to Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station ML1018909482010-07-0808 July 2010 Commission Notification Letter on Pilgrim ML1019300272010-07-0808 July 2010 Email from Mary Lampert Regarding Commission Notification Relating to Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station ML1020201892010-07-0808 July 2010 Notification of Information in the Matter of Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station ML1019403422010-07-0606 July 2010 Entergy'S Sixteenth Supplemental Disclosure ML1017401302010-06-16016 June 2010 Entergy'S Fifteenth Supplemental Disclosure ML1017304722010-06-13013 June 2010 Pilgrim Watch Supplement to Sixth Disclosure Statement ML1016600152010-06-10010 June 2010 Request for Identity and Related Information for the Witnesses Mary Lampert Identified to the Board in May 4 Telephone Conference ML1016800632010-06-0707 June 2010 Pilgrim Watch Sixth Disclosure Statement 2020-06-30
[Table view] Category:Rulemaking-Comment
MONTHYEARNRC-2015-0070, Comment (044) from Mary Lampert of Pilgrim Watch on PR-20, 26, 50, 51, 52, 72, 73 and 140 - Regulatory Improvements for Production and Utilization Facilities Transitioning to Decommissioning2022-08-22022 August 2022 Comment (044) from Mary Lampert of Pilgrim Watch on PR-20, 26, 50, 51, 52, 72, 73 and 140 - Regulatory Improvements for Production and Utilization Facilities Transitioning to Decommissioning ML22138A4242022-05-0606 May 2022 Comment (011) from Andrea Altieri on PR-20, 26, 50, 51, 52, 72, 73 and 140 - Regulatory Improvements for Production and Utilization Facilities Transitioning to Decommissioning ML18157A3062018-06-0202 June 2018 Comment (036) from Betsy Smith on the Requirements for the Indefinite Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel ML18157A3072018-06-0101 June 2018 Comment (035) of Anonymous Individual on the Requirements for the Indefinite Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel ML18150A6382018-05-29029 May 2018 Comment (024) from Janet Azarovitz on the Requirements for the Indefinite Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel ML17165A1972017-06-13013 June 2017 Comment (11) from Pilgrim Watch Regarding Regulatory Improvements for Power Reactors Transitioning to Decommissioning ML16081A4652016-03-21021 March 2016 Comment (072) of Beatrice Blake on ANPR-26, 50, 52, 73, and 140 - Regulatory Improvements for Decommissioning Power Reactors ML16084B0142016-03-18018 March 2016 Comment (142) of Susan Carpenter on Behalf of Cape Downwinders on ANPR-26, 50, 73, and 140 - Regulatory Improvements for Decommissioning Power Reactors ML16085A3132016-03-18018 March 2016 Comment (154) of Sandra and Charles Kosterman on ANPR-26, 50, 73, and 140 - Regulatory Improvements for Decommissioning Power Reactors ML16084A9962016-03-17017 March 2016 Comment (127) of Susan Carpenter on Behalf of Cape Downwinders on ANPR-26, 50, 73, and 140 - Regulatory Improvements for Decommissioning Power Reactors ML16081A4682016-03-15015 March 2016 Comment (075) of Rosanne Shapiro on ANPR-26, 50, 52, 73, and 140 - Regulatory Improvements for Decommissioning Power Reactors ML16053A5152016-02-17017 February 2016 Comment (037) of Emma Stamas on ANPR-26, 50, 52, 73, and 140 - Regulatory Improvements for Decommissioning Power Reactors ML15349A8602015-12-11011 December 2015 Comment (007) of Rosemary and Cal Wilvert on ANPR-26, 50, 52, 73, and 140 - Regulatory Improvements for Decommissioning Power Reactors ML15342A0552015-11-21021 November 2015 Comment (003) of Janet Azarovitz on ANPR-26, 50, 52, 73, and 140 - Regulatory Improvements for Decommissioning Power Reactors ML13345A2672013-12-0505 December 2013 Comment (00351) of Brian O'Malley on PR-51, Waste Confidence - Continued Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel ML13339A2982013-12-0404 December 2013 Comment (00330) of Lee Roscoe on PR-51, Waste Confidence - Continued Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel ML12201A0292012-07-16016 July 2012 Comment (262) of Robert Holt on PRM-50-104 Regarding Emergency Planning Zone ML12200A2592012-07-16016 July 2012 Comment (180) of Peter Samal on PRM-50-104 Regarding Emergency Planning Zone NRC-2012-0046, Comment (285) of Aliston Macmartin, Et Al on PRM-50-104 Regarding Emergency Planning Zone2012-07-12012 July 2012 Comment (285) of Aliston Macmartin, Et Al on PRM-50-104 Regarding Emergency Planning Zone ML12181A3082012-05-31031 May 2012 Comment (158) of Barbara Tiner on Behalf of the Selectboard of the Town of Leverett, Ma on PRM-50-104, Regarding Emergency Planning Zone ML12146A1862012-05-19019 May 2012 Comment (130) of Brooke Schoepf on PRM-50-104 Regarding Emergency Planning Zone NRC-2010-0135, Commission Memorandum and Order (CLI-11-05) Regarding Pr 52 AP1000 Design Certification Amendment2011-09-0909 September 2011 Commission Memorandum and Order (CLI-11-05) Regarding Pr 52 AP1000 Design Certification Amendment ML1125211062011-09-0909 September 2011 Commission Memorandum and Order (CLI-11-05) Regarding Pr 52 ESBWR Design Certification Amendment ML1125210392011-09-0909 September 2011 Commission Memorandum and Order (CLI-11-05) Regarding Pr 52 AP1000 Design Certification Amendment NRC-2009-0554, Comment (9) of Mark Leyse on Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-95 Requesting the NRC to Order Vermont Yankee to Lower the Licensing Basis Peak Cladding Temperature in Order to Provide a Necessary Margin of Safety in the Event of a LOCA2011-07-30030 July 2011 Comment (9) of Mark Leyse on Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-95 Requesting the NRC to Order Vermont Yankee to Lower the Licensing Basis Peak Cladding Temperature in Order to Provide a Necessary Margin of Safety in the Event of a LOCA ML1033402512010-11-24024 November 2010 2010/11/24-Comment (4) of John C. Butler, NEI, on New England Coalition PRM-50-95 Requesting the NRC to Order Vermont Yankee to Lower the Licensing Basis Peak Cladding Temperature in Order to Provide a Necessary Margin of Safety in the Even ML0929309822009-10-19019 October 2009 2009/10/19-Comment (26) of Mary Lampert, Et. Al., on Behalf of Pilgrim Watch on Rules PR-50 and 50, Enhancements to Emergency Preparedness Regulations. ML0909005812009-03-26026 March 2009 Comment (1) of George J. Silvestri, Jr. on ANPR 171, Variable Annual Fee Structure for Power Reactors ML0904802662009-02-0505 February 2009 Comment (141) of Elizabeth Adams on Pr 51 Consideration of Environmental Impacts of Temporary Storage of Spent Fuel After Cessation of Reactor Operation, and Pr 51 Waste Confidence Decision Update ML0904800492009-02-0303 February 2009 Comment (122) of Randy Kehler Pr 51 Consideration of Environmental Impacts of Temporary Storage of Spent Fuel After Cessation of Reactor Operation, and Pr 51 Waste Confidence Decision Update ML0904402452009-01-29029 January 2009 Comment (44) of Scott Ainslie on Pr 51 Consideration of Environmental Impacts of Temporary Storage of Spent Fuel After Cessation of Reactor Operation, and Pr 51 Waste Confidence Decision Update ML0904403152009-01-28028 January 2009 Comment (37) of Sally Newton on Pr 51 Consideration of Environmental Impacts of Temporary Storage of Spent Fuel After Cessation of Reactor Operation, and Pr 51 Waste Confidence Decision Update ML0813507272008-05-12012 May 2008 Comment (2) of Rochelle Becker, Glenn Carroll, & Mary Lampert on Behalf of the Alliance for Nuclear Responsibility, Nuclear Waste South and Pilgrim Watch Regarding Pr 50, Power Reactor Security Requirements; Supplemental Proposed Rule ML0726705742007-09-24024 September 2007 Comment (13) of Lisa Rainwater on Behalf of Riverkeeper on Epstein'S PRM-50-85 Re to Extend the Minimum Distance from Five to Ten Miles for Host School Pick-up Points Beyond Plume Exposure Boundary Line ML0726702452007-09-23023 September 2007 Comment (12) of Mary Lampert on Behalf of Pilgrim Watch, Et. Al. on Epstein PRM-50-85 Re to Extend the Minimum Distance from Five to Ten Miles for Host School Pick-up Points Beyond Plume Exposure Boundary Line ML0725405732007-09-10010 September 2007 Comment (9) of Mary Lampet on Behalf of Pilgrim Watch, Et. Al. Supporting Epstein'S PRM-50-85 to Extend the Minimum Distance from Five to Ten Miles for Host School Pick-up Points Beyond Plume Exposure Boundary Line ML0708001252007-03-20020 March 2007 Comment (61) Submitted by Wedge Bramhall on Massachusetts Attorney General'S PRM-51-10 Re Amend 10 CFR Part 51 - Spent Fuel ML0708103842007-03-19019 March 2007 Comment (64) Submitted by Paul A. Gaukler on Behalf of Entergy Corp. on Massachusetts Attorney General'S PRM-51-10 Re Amend 10 CFR Part 51 - Spent Fuel ML0707906462007-03-19019 March 2007 Comment (52) Submitted by Joseph A. Parzych on Massachusetts Attorney General'S PRM-51-10 Re Amend 10 CFR Part 51- Spent Fuel ML0707906682007-03-19019 March 2007 Comment (57) Submitted by Judy and Howard Hall on Massachusetts Attorney General'S PRM-51-10 Re Amend of 10 CFR Part 51 - Spent Fuel ML0707906552007-03-19019 March 2007 Comment (54) Submitted by Scott Ainslie on Massachusetts Attorney General'S PRM-51-10 Re Amend 10 CFR Part 51 - Spent Fuel ML0707906712007-03-19019 March 2007 Comment (58) Submitted by William C Pearson on Massachusetts Attorney General'S PRM-51-10 Re Amend of 10 CFR Part 51 - Spent Fuel ML0707906372007-03-19019 March 2007 Comment (50) Submitted by Sally Shaw on Massachusetts Attorney General'S PRM-51-10 Re Amend 10 CFR Part 51 - Spent Fuel ML0707906742007-03-19019 March 2007 Comment (59) Submitted by Eleanor I. Gavin on Massachusetts Attorney General'S PRM-51-10 Re Amend of 10 CFR Part 51 - Spent Fuel ML0707303452007-03-13013 March 2007 Comment (35) Submitted by Edward and Charlotte Russell Supporting Massachusetts Attorney General'S PRM-51-10 Re Spent Fuel at the Pilgrim ML0707105622007-03-0909 March 2007 Comment (31) Submitted by Richard C. Diprima on Massachusetts Attorney General'S PRM-51-10, Re Amend 10 CFR Part 51 ML0707301562007-03-0707 March 2007 Comment (15) of Sunny Miller on Behalf of Traprock Peace Center on War with Iran and Hazards at the Vermont Yankee Reactor ML0706606322007-03-0707 March 2007 Comment (30) Submitted by Marilyn Harquail on Massachusetts Attorney General'S PRM 51-10 Re Amend 10 CFR Part 51 ML0706503682007-03-0404 March 2007 Comment (23) Submitted by Kevin W. Craig on Massachusetts Attorney General'S PRM-51-10 Re to Amend 10 CFR Part 51 ML0706503632007-03-0202 March 2007 Comment (21) Submitted by Janice Nickerson on Massachusetts PRM-51-10 Re to Amend 10 CFR Part 51 2022-08-22
[Table view] |
Text
Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman.2300 N Street NW Washington, DC 20037-1122 Tel 202.663.8000 Fax 202.663.8007 www.plflsburyaw.com DOCKETED USNRC August 30, 2006 September 20, 2006 (3:45pm) OFFICE OF SECRETARY RULEMAKINGS AND ADJUDICATIONS STAFF David R. Lewis Phone: 202.663.8474 david.lewis@pillsburylaw.com PRM-51-10 Hon. Dale E. Klein, Chairman U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20005 ,don. Jeffrey S. Merrifield, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20005 Hon. Edward McGaffigan, Jr., U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20005 Hon. Gregory B. Jaczko, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20005 Hon. Peter B. Lyons U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20005 Re: Massachusetts Attorney General's Petition for Rulemaking to Amend 10 C.F.R. Part 51 (Aug. 25, 2006) Dear Chairman Klein and Commissioners McGaffigan, Merrifield, Jaczko, and Lyons: On August 25, 2006, the Massachusetts Attorney General filed a Petition for Rulemaking to amend 10 C.F.R. Part 51 because of information asserted to be new and significant and alleged to show that the determination made in the Generic Environmental Impact Statement for Renewal of Nuclear Power Plant Licenses -that "the likelihood of a fuel cladding fire is highly remote"- is incorrect.
The Petition's claims of new and significant information parallel those made by the Massachusetts Attorney General in the license renewal proceedings for the Vermont Yankee and Pilgrim Nuclear Power Stations (Docket Nos. 50-271-LR and 50-293-LR) and the Petition relies on and incorporates the contention and the supporting materials filed by the Massachusetts Attorney General in those proceedings.
For completeness, Entergy wishes to direct the Commission's attention to Entergy's answers and brief in those proceedings (to which the Massachusetts Attorney General has replied) which explain why the Massachusetts Attorney General's 400448933v1 1FemploJ-ee&zL,7r5 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission August 30, 2006 Page 2 information is neither new nor significant.
See Entergy's Answer to the Massachusetts Attorney General's Request for a Hearing, Petition for Leave to Intervene, and Petition for Backfit Order (June 22, 2006) (ML061790134 at 14-25, Pilgrim; ML061780616 at 13-25 Vermont Yankee); "Entergy's Brief on New and Significant Information in Response to Licensing Board Order of July 14, 2006" (July 21, 2006) (ML062080589 at 11-24, Pilgrim).
The Massachusetts Attorney General's Rulemaking Petition requests (at 3) that the Commission "withhold any decision to renew the operating licenses for the Pilgrim and Vermont Yankee nuclear power plants until the requested rulemaking has been completed and until the NRC has completed" the related NEPA process that may be required by any amended rule. Entergy notes that the NRC Staff has tentatively scheduled issuance of the renewed licenses for both plants, if approved, by November 27, 2007 (if no hearing is granted) and by July 27, 2008 (if a hearing is granted).
See www.nrc. gov/reactors/operatine/icensing/renewal/applications/vermont-yankee.html; www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/Iicensing/renewal/applications/Silgrjm.html.
While disagreeing with the Attorney General's request to withhold license renewal pending the completion of any rulemaking, Entergy respectfully asks that the Commission act on and resolve the rulemaking petition by November 2007 in order to avoid any potential for delay in the renewal of the Vermont Yankee and Pilgrim licenses.
Entergy reserves the right to provide additional comments on whether new and significant information exists and whether issuance of the renewed licenses should be withheld pending completion of any rulemaking if and when the Commission publishes the Petition for public comment.
Sincerely, David R. Lewis Counsel for Entergy cc: Service Lists for Pilgrim and Vermont Yankee License Renewal Proceedings Certificate of Service I certify that copies of the foregoing letter to Chairman Klein and Commissioners McGaffigan, Merrifield, Jaczko and Lyons from David R. Lewis dated August 30, 2006, were served on the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board and the counsel and other representatives of the parties to the Pilgrim and Vermont Yankee licensing renewal proceedings listed below by deposit in the U.S. mail, first class, postage prepaid, this 30e day of August, 2006.Administrative Judge Alex S. Karlin, Esq., Chairman Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Mail Stop T-3 F23 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 ask2@nrc.gov Administrative Judge Dr. Thomas S. Elleman Atomic Safety and Licensing Board 5207 Creedmoor Road, #101, Raleigh, NC 27612. tse@nrc.gov; elleman@eos.ncsu.edu Administrative Judge Dr. Richard F. Cole Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Mail Stop T-3 F23 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 rfcl@nrc.gov Administrative Judge Dr. Richard E. Wardwell Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Mail Stop T-3 F23 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 rew@nrc.gov Administrative Judge Ann Marshall Young, Esq., Chair Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Mail Stop T-3 F23 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 amy@nrc.gov Administrative Judge Paul B. Abramson Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 pba~nrc.gov 400448933v0 Secretary Att'n: Rulemakings and Adjudications Staff Mail Stop 0-16 CI U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 secy@nrc.gov, hearingdocket(nrc.gov Office of Commission Appellate Adjudication Mail Stop 0-16 Cl U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 Mitzi A. Young, Esq. Steven C. Hamrick, Esq. Office of the General Counsel Mail Stop 0-15 D21 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 may@nrc.gov; schl@nrc.gov Anthony Z. Roisman, Esq. National Legal Scholars Law Firm 84 East Thetford Road Lyme, NH 03768 aroisman@nationallegalscholars.com Callie B. Newton, Chair Gail MacArthur Lucy Gratwick Town of Marlboro Selectboard P.O. Box 518 Marlboro, VT 05344 marcialynn@evl.net; cbnewton(asover.net Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Mail Stop T-3 F23 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 Sarah Hofmann, Esq. Director of Public Advocacy Department of Public Service 112 State Street -Drawer 20 Montpelier, VT 05620-2601 Sarah.hofinann(state.vt.us Ronald A. Shems, Esq. Karen Tyler, Esq. Shems, Dunkiel, Kassel & Saunders, PLLC 9 College Street Burlington, VT 05401 rshems(sdkslaw.com ktyler@sdkslaw.com Diane Curran, Esq. Harmon, Curran, Spielberg
&Eisenberg, LLP 1726 M Street, N.W., Suite 600 Washington, D.C. 20036 dcurran@harmoncurran.com Matthew Brock, Esq. Assistant Attorney General Environmental Protection Division Office of the Attorney General One Ashburton Place Boston, MA 02108 Matthew.brock@ago.state.ma.us Mr. Dan MacArthur Director, Emergency Management P.O. Box 30 Marlboro, VY 50344 dmacarthur@igc.org Ms. Mary Lampert 148 Washington Street Duxbury, MA 02332 lampert@adelphia.net Mr. Mark D. Sylvia Town Manager Town of Plymouth I 1 Lincoln St. Plymouth MA, 02360 msylvia@townhall.plymouth.ma.us Susan L. Uttal, Esq. Marian L. Zobler, Esq. Office of the General Counsel Mail Stop 0-15 D21 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 slu@nrc.gov; hew@nrc.gov Molly H. Bartlett, Esq. 52 Crooked Lane Duxbury, MA 02332 mollyhbartlett@hotmail.com Sheila Slocum Hollis, Esq. Duane Morris LLP 1667 K Street, N.W. Suite 700 Washington, D.C. 20006 sshollis@duanemorris.com David R. Lewis