ML070710562

Comment (31) Submitted by Richard C. Diprima on Massachusetts Attorney General'S PRM-51-10, Re Amend 10 CFR Part 51

ML070710562
Person / Time
Site:	Pilgrim
Issue date:	03/09/2007
From:	Diprima R - No Known Affiliation
To:	NRC/SECY
SECY RAS
References
71FR64169 00031, PRM-51-10
Download: ML070710562 (2)

Text

PRM-51-10 DOCKETED 03/12/07 (71FR64169)

Comment No. 31 From: "Rocky" <rockydux@gmail.com>

To: <SECY@nrc.gov>

Date: Fri, Mar 9, 2007 9:25 PM

Subject:

PRM-51-10 I am writing in regards to the importance that the NRC consider the spent fuel pool as an environmental hazard and great public health risk when considering a 20 year license renewal for the Pilgrim Power Station.

The NRC has allowed the spent fuel pool to be "double racked" which is a prime terrorist target because the loss of coolant could result in a catastrophic radioactive fire. This has been well researched by Mr. David Lochbaum of the Union of Concerned Scientists http://www.ucsusa.org/news/experts/experts-at-ucs-david-lochbaum.html and others. I can't think of bigger and higher risk environmental threat than a fire that is releasing Cesium 137 http://www.epa.gov/radiation/radionuclides/cesium.htm into the atmosphere and surrounding terrain.

There is also, as with anything, the risk of human error or mechanical failure that could have the same consequences. I believe all these environmental threats should be included in any analysis. There are ways of minimizing this risk that could be discussed if a review is allowed.

I urge you to do all that you can to see to it that this be considered in the NRC's re-license criteria.

Respectfully, Richard C. DiPrima 31 Cove St.

Duxbury, MA 02332

Mail Envelope Properties (45F216ED.792 : 23 : 30610)

Subject:

PRM-51-10 Creation Date Fri, Mar 9, 2007 9:24 PM From: "Rocky" <rockydux@gmail.com>

Created By: rockydux@gmail.com Recipients nrc.gov TWGWPO02.HQGWDO01 SECY (SECY)

Post Office Route TWGWPO02.HQGWDO01 nrc.gov Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 1240 Friday, March 9, 2007 9:24 PM TEXT.htm 4612 Mime.822 8685 Options Expiration Date: None Priority: Standard ReplyRequested: No Return Notification: None Concealed

Subject:

No Security: Standard Junk Mail Handling Evaluation Results Message is eligible for Junk Mail handling This message was not classified as Junk Mail Junk Mail settings when this message was delivered Junk Mail handling disabled by User Junk Mail handling disabled by Administrator Junk List is not enabled Junk Mail using personal address books is not enabled Block List is not enabled