ML101730472
| ML101730472 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Pilgrim |
| Issue date: | 06/13/2010 |
| From: | Lampert M Pilgrim Watch |
| To: | Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel |
| SECY RAS | |
| References | |
| 50-293-LR, ASLBP 06-848-02-LR, RAS J-243 | |
| Download: ML101730472 (11) | |
Text
IAArs, 2
2 DOCKETED USNRC June 13, 2010 (3:10 p.m.)
OFFICE OF SECRETARY RULEMAKINGS AND ADJUDICATIONS STAFF UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD In the Matter of Docket # 50-293-LR ASLB No. 06-848-02-LR Entergy Corporation Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station License Renewal Application June 13, 2010 Pilgrim Watch responds to Entergy's letter of June 10, 2010 where Mr. Gaukler-noted that the Pilgrim Watch's sixth disclosure was not accompanied by a sworn affidavit, citing 10 C.F.R. 2.336 (c ).1 Pilgrim Watch notes that this had not been prior practice in filing disclosures in Contention 1, nor previously in Contention 3, unless the disclosures were submitted by a party's expert or in Entergy's case a Pilgrim Station employee. However Pilgrim Watch now provides a supplement to this disclosure with an affidavit and will continue in subsequent disclosures.
SUPPLEMENT TO SIXTH DISCLOSURE STATEMENT BY PILGRIM WATCH Methodologies for Assessing the Economic Consequences of Nuclear Reactor Accidents, Nuclear Energy Agency Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development(OECD), OECD, 2000,ISBN 92 17658-6 Chanin, D.; Murfin, W. (1996). Site Restoration.: Estimation of Attributable Costs from Plutonium-Dispersal Accidents, SAND96-0957, DE9601166, Sandia National Laboratories. Original 300-dpi OSTI version available at: http://chaninconsulting.com/downloads/sand96-0957.pdf (10.4 MB), OCR-readable courtesy S. Aftergood, FAS.
'10 C.F.R 2.336(c) Each party and the NRC staff shall make its initial disclosures under paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section, based on the information and documentation then reasonably available to it. A party, including the NRC staff, is not excused from making the required disclosures because it has not fully completed its investigation of the case, it challenges the sufficiency of another entity's disclosures, or that another entity has not yet made its disclosures. All disclosures under this section must be accompanied by a certification (by sworn affidavit) that all relevant materials required by this section have been disclosed, and that the disclosures are accurate and complete as of the date of the certification.
1 4eL4m,-
Young, M.; Chanin, D. (1997). "MACCS2 Development and Verification Efforts,SAND97-0561 C, DE97004202, conference paper, Sandia National Laboratories. Available at:
http://www.osti.gov/bridge/product.biblio.j sp?ostiid=453548&query-id=2.
Chanin, D.I.; Young, M.L. (1997 & 1998). Code Manualfor MACCS2: Volume 1, User's Guide, SAND97-0594, NUREG/CR-6613, Sandia National Laboratories. Because of its recent disappearance from OSTI, now available here: http://chaninconsulting.com/downloads/maccs2vl.pdf (925 KB).
Steele, C.M.; Wald, T.L.; Chanin, D.I. (1998). Plutonium Explosive Dispersal Modeling Using the MACCS2 Computer Code, LA-UR-98-1901, DE99000564, Los Alamos National Laboratory. Download full text: LA-UR-98-1901.pdf(3 MB).
Hills, C.R.; Chanin, D.I.; Dickerman, C.L. (1998). Validation Study ofAvailable Modelsfor Consideration of Explosive Releases at Pantex Plant, RPT-30, Mason & Hanger Corporation. Download full text: Validation Study of Explosive Releases.pdf (872 KB).
Chanin, D.I. (2005), "The Development of MACCS2: Lessons Learned," [written for:] EFCOG Safety Analysis Annual Workshop Proceedings, Santa Fe, NM, April 29-May 5, 2005.. Full text: the development of maccs2.pdf (154 KB), revised 12/17/2009.
Chanin, D.I.; Young, M.L. (1997). Code Manualfor MACCS2." Volume 1, User's Guide, NUREG/CR-6613, SAND97-0594, Sandia National Laboratories. Available at:
http://www.doeal.gov/SWEIS/OtherDocuments/481 /%20MACCS2%2OVol%201.pdf DOE-EH-4.2.1.3-MACCS2-Gap Analysis, Software Quality Assurance Improvement Plan: MACCS2 Gap Analysis, May 2004.
DOE-EH-4.2.1.4-MACCS2-Code Guidance, MACCS2 Computer Code Application Guidance for Documented Safety Analysis, June 2004.
NUREG/CR 6853, Comparison of Average Transport and Dispersion Among a Gaussian, a Two-Dimensional, and a Three-Dimensional Model, October 2004.
NUREG/CR-0936 Recommendations for Meteorological Measurement Programs and Atmospheric Diffusion Prediction Methods for Use at Coastal Nuclear Reactor Sites, Raynor, SethuRaman, Brookhaven National Laboratory, 1979 NUREG/CR-338, Method to characterize Local Meteorology at Nuclear Facilities for Application to Emergency Response Needs, Battelle Pacific Northwest Labs, April 1986 NUREG/CP-0032, Workshop on Meteorological Aspects of Emergency Response Plans for Nuclear Power Plants, Brookhaven National Lab., April 1982 NUREG/CR 3332, Radiological Assessment, A textbook on Environmental Dose Analysis, ORNL, Sept.
1983 2
NUREG-1437, Revision 1 [3-301 July 2009, ML091770049 NUREG 1887: RASCAL version 3.0.5 RASCAL 4 Beta Release Files, February 2010 EPA, 1987: EPA Complex Terrain Model Development: Final Report. EPA Publication No. EPA-600/3-88-1621 10. (NTIS No. PB-1621 10).
EPA, 2000: 40 CFR Part 51: Appendix W. Guideline on Air Quality Models.p21517.
EPA, 2003: 40 CFR Part 51: Appendix W. Guideline on Air Quality Models.p 18440-18482.
EPA, 2005: US Environmental Protection Agency (2005) Appendix W to Part 51 -
Guideline on Air Quality Models, 40 CFR Ch. I (1 1-9-05 Edition) p6 82 18-68261.
Molenkamp, C.R., N.E. Bixler, C.W. Morrow, J.V. Ramsdell and J.A. Mitchell, 2004:
Comparison of Average Transport and Dispersion Among a Gaussian, a Two-Dimensional, and a Three Dimensional Model. NUREG/CR-6853. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research Washington, DC 20555-0001.
Scire, J.S., and R.J. Yamartino, 2000a: A User's Guide for the CALPUFF Dispersion Model (Version 5.0). Earth Tech, Inc., Concord, MA.
Scire, J.S., F.R. Robe, M.E. Fernau and R.J. Yamartino, 2000b: A User's Guide for the CALMET Meteorological Model (Version 5.0). Earth Tech, Inc., Concord Senff, C. J.; Hardesty, R. M.; Brewer, W. A.; Alvarez, R. J.; Sandberg, S. P.; Tucker. S. C.; Intrieri, J. M.;
Marchbanks, R. D.; McCarty, B. J.; Banta. R. M.; Darby, L. S.; White, A. B.
American Geophysical Union, Fall Meeting 2005, abstract #A53D-08http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005AGUFM.A53D..08SVertical Structure, Transport, and Mixing of Ozone and Aerosols Observed During NEAQS/ICARTT 2004 Angevine, Wayne; Tjernstr6m, Michael; Zagar, Mark, Modeling of the Coastal Boundary Layer and Pollutant Transport in New England, Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology 2006; 45: 137-154 Angevine, Wayne; Senff, Cristoph; White,Allen; Williams, Eric; Koermer,James; Miller,Samuel T.K; Talbot,Robert, Johnston, Paul; McKeen,Stuart, Coastal Boundary Layer Influence on Pollutant Transport in New England, http://joumals.ametsoc.org/doi/full/10.175/JAM2148.1 Miller, Samule T.K.; Keim, Barry; Synoptic-Scale Controls on the Sea Breeze of the Central New England Coast, AMS Journal Online, Volume 18, Issue 2 (April 2003) http://journals.ametsoc.org/doi/full/l 0.1175/1520-0434%282003%29018%3C0236%3ASCOTSB%3E2.0.CO%3B2 Angevine, Wayne; Trainer, Michael; McKeen, Stuart; Berkowitz, Carl; Mesoscale meteorology of the New England coast. Gulf of Maine, and Nova Scotia: Overview, JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, VOL. 101, NO. D22, PP. 28,893-28,901, 1996 doi:10.1029/95JD03271 http://www.agu.org/pubs/crossref/1996/95JD03271.shtml 3
A Lake and Land Breeze Primer, Dr. David Sills, http://www.yorku.ca/pat/research/dsills/primer.html Suresh, E.; Observation of Sea Breeze Front and its Induced Convection over Chennai in Southern Peninsular India Using Doppler Weather Radar, June 2007 http://www.springerlink.con/content/pI65n645w5772hv4/
Planchon, 0; Damato, F; Dubreuil, V; Gouery, P;A method of identifying and locating sea-breeze fronts in north-eastern Brazil by remote sensing April 2006 http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract;j sessionid=B78822076DEBDD5DB387F9C8138737 B8.tomcat I ?fromPage=online&aid=465851 Crouch, Andrew Andrew David. A Climatology of the Sea Breeze Front in the Coastal Carolinas and Georgia. http://www.lib.ncsu.edu/theses/available/etd-08062006-122207/unrestricted/etd.pdf Aijun Ding, Tao Wang, Ming Zhao, Tijian Wang and Zongkai Li,Simulation of sea-land breezes and a discussion of their implications on the transport of air pollution during a multi-day ozone episode in the Pearl River Delta of China, Atmospheric Environment Volume 38, Issue 39, December 2004, Pages 6737-6750 http://www.sciencedirect.com/science? ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6VH3-4DS8JBR-6&_user= I 0&_coverDate= 12%2F0 1 %2F2004&_rdoc= 1 &_fmt=high&_orig=search&_sort=d&_docanch or=&view=c&_searchStrld= 1356948703&_rerunOrigin=google&_acct=-CO00050221 &_version=]I &_url Version=0&_userid=l 0&md5=00e6e91393ee 1181620bf3e5d474ba63 Land and Sea Breezes, http://www.pilotfriend.com/training/flight-training/met/prvwnd.htm Sea Breeze Soaring, http://www.aviationweather.ws/097_SeaBreezeSoaring.php Commonwealth of Massachusetts, State Hazard Mitigation Plan, 2007 http://www.mass.gov/Eeops/docs/mema/disasterrecovery/stateplan_2007_rvn4.pdf Environmental Science and Engineering, J. Glynn Henry & Gary W. Heinke, (Prentice-Hall 1989)
Cardis, Elizabeth -Risk of cancer risk after low doses of ionising radiation: retrospective cohort study in 15 countries. British Medical Journal (2005) 331:77.
Krestinina LY, Preston DL, Ostroumova EV, Degteva MO, Ron E, Vyushkova OV, et al. 2005.
Protracted radiation exposure and cancer mortality in the Techa River cohort. Radiation Research 164(5):602-611.
Wing S, Richardson D, Armstrong D, Crawford-Brown D. A Reevaluation of Cancer Incidence Near the Three Mile Island Nuclear Plant: The Collision of Evidence and Assumptions. Environmental Health Perspectives 1997.105(1):52-67; and the utility paid out more than $15 million in settlements to citizens for damages.
LaVie, Stephen F.; "hat's in the Black Box; NRC presentation to the National Radiological Emergency Planning Conference, ADAMS - ML091050226, ML091050257, and ML091050269 4
NRC, Regulatory Guide 1.111, Methods for Estimating Atmospheric Transport and Dispersion of Gaseous Effluents in Routine Releases from Light-Water-Cooled Reactors (July 1977 NRC Regulatory Guide 123 (Safety Guide 23) On Site Meteorological Programs 1972, U.S.NRC, 1977, Draft for Comment Reg. Guide 1.1 11 at Ic NUREG/BR-0150, Vol.1 Rev.4, Section Q; ADAMS Accession Number ML062560259, Kalinin WER-1 000 Nuclear power Station Unit 1 PRA, Procedures Guide for a Probabilistic Risk Assessment, NUREG/CR-6572, Rev. 1 Regulatory Guide 1.23, Meteorological Monitoring Programs for Nuclear Power Plants, 2007 EPA's 2005 Guideline on Air Quality Models, Section 7.2.8 Inhomogenous Local Winds EPA 2000 report, Meteorological Monitoring Guidance for Regulatory Model Applications, EPA-454/R-99-005, February 2000. Section 3.4 Tracking and Predicting the Atmospheric Dispersion of Hazardous Material Releases Implications for Homeland Security, Committee on the Atmospheric Dispersion of Hazardous Material Releases Board on Atmospheric Sciences and Climate Division on Earth and Life Studies, National Research Council of the National Academies, 2003 Raynor, G.S.P. Michael, and S. SethuRaman, 1979, Recommendations for Meteorological Measurement Programs and Atmospheric Diffusion Prediction Methods for Use at Coastal Nuclear Reactor Sites.
NUREG/CR-0936, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC.
Nuclear Utility Meteorological Data Users Group (NUMUG): At the 1994 American Nuclear Society Topical Meeting Environmental Transport and Dosimetry Aug 31-Sept 3, 1993, Charleston, SC, An Atmospheric Dispersion Modelfor Emergency Response, K Jerry Allwine (Pacific Northwest Laboratory, Richland, Washington) NUMUG 1994 The Goignia Radiation Incident A Failure of Science and Society, Marco Ant6nio Sperb Leite L. David Roper, 1988 http://arts.bev.net/roperldavid/gri.htm Reichmuth, Barbara; Short, Steve; Wood, Tom; Economic Consequences of a Rad/Nuc Attack: Cleanup Standards Significantly Affect Cost, Pacific Northwest Laboratory, Working Together: Research &
Development (R&D) partnership in Homeland Security Conference, April 28, 2005, Boston, MA (Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, PNNL-SA-45256)
Elcock, Deborah; Klemic, Gladys A; Tobias, Anibal L; "Establishing Remediation Levels in Response to a Radiological Event (or "Dirty Bomb")." Environmental Sciences & Technology, Vol. 38, No. 9, 2004.
United States General Accounting Office, "Radiation Standards Scientific Basis Inconclusive, and EPA and NRC Disagreement Continues," June 2004.
Zimmerman, Peter D; Loeb, Cheryl; "Dirty Bombs: The Threat Revisited,"
5
Defense Horizons Number 38, January 2004.
Brain, Jason; Orr, James; Rapaport, Carol; "Measuring the Effects of the September 11 Attack on New York City," FRBNY Economic Policy Review, November 2002.
http://www.geo.arizona.edu/-ldix/g256/hurricanes.html Luna Robert E; Yoshimura, H. Richard; Soo Hoo, Mark S; Survey of Costs Arising From Potential Radionuclide Scattering Event, Sandia National Laboratories, WM2008 Conference February 24-28, Phoenix AZ Chen, S.Y.; Tenforde, Thomas S.; Radiological Dispersal Device (RDD) Argonne National Laboratory, EVS Human Health Fact Sheet, August 2005 http.//www.ead.anl.gov/pub/doc/rdd.pdf Optimization Approaches to Decision Making on Long-Term Cleanup and Site Restoration Following a Nuclear or Radiological Terrorism Incident HOMELAND SECURITYAFFAIRS, VOLUME VI, NO. 1 (JANUARY 2010) WWW.HSAJ.ORG http://www.hsaj.org/pages/volume6/issue1/pdfs/6.1.4.pdf GAO January 2010 COMBATING NUCLEAR TERRORISM Actions Needed to Better Prepare to Recover from Possible Attacks Using Radiological or Nuclear Materials, GAO-10-204 Secretary Commission Voting Record, Decision Item: Secy-09-0051
Title:
Evaluation of Radiological Consequence Models and Codes, June 23, 2009 http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/commission/cvr/2009/2009-005 lvtr.pdf Broken Arrows: The Palomares and Thule Accidents http://www.brookings.edu/projects/archive/nucweapons/box7_3.aspx How safe is Palomares after its nuclear accident? Spanish Town Struggles to Forget Its Moment on the Brink of a Nuclear Cataclysm, Paul Geitner, New York Times, 09.12.2008 I swear under penalty of perjury that all relevant materials required have been disclosed, and that the disclosures are accurate and complete as of the date of certification.
Respectfully Submibld'--
Mary Lampert Pilgrim Watch, pro se 148 Washington Street Duxbury, MA 02332 June 13, 2010 6
June 13, 2010 Paul A. Gaukler Counsel for Entergy Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman, LLP 2300 N Street, NW Washington, D.C. 20037-1122
Dear Paul:
Your letter of June 10, 2010 noted that Pilgrim Watch had tentatively identified potential witnesses during the May 4, 2010 telephone conference, but that this was not repeated in Pilgrim Watch's sixth disclosure. However, identifying witnesses at this stage and providing a copy of the analysis and/or other authority upon which that person bases his or her opinion in the proceeding is premature because the board has not issued an order regarding the scope of the proceeding or the proposed schedule for hearing. You referenced 10 C.F.R 2.336(a)(1), it says that witnesses shall be disclosed unless otherwise ordered by the ASLB assigned to the proceeding.
During the May 4, 2010 Teleconference, it was made clear that the timing for parties to issue a witness list will be set after it is decided what exactly is going to be heard in this proceeding'; and an Order to that effect would be issued.2 The board has not yet issued its order.
When the Order is issued, I will send to you the information requested and required.
ADMIN. JUDGE ABRAMSON: Judge Young, Judge Abramson here. Let me say that I'm sympathetic to the inability, particularly of Pilgrim Watch, to figure out which experts it will need until we issue an order laying out exactly what's going to be heard. And I think that the Board will try to do that rapidly; is that right? CHAIR YOUNG: I think that's right. (Neal Gross & Co., Inc., Washington DC, Transcript Teleconference May 4, 2010,p.
661, lines 14-20) Emphasis added 2 MS. LAMPERT: Are you going to put that out in an order? I'd prefer things in orders. I'm not trying to put work on you but... CHAIR YOUNG: Righ. We'll try to do that. (Ibid, p. 666, line 12) Emphasis added
The tentative list of potential witnesses provided during the Teleconference call (Teleconference Transcript, p. 653) included: David I. Chanin; Dr. Richard Clapp; Dr. Bruce Egan, Arnold Gundersen, Dr. Edwin Lyman; Dr. Gordon Thompson. You received Dr. Bruce Egan's and David Chanin's CV in Support of Pilgrim Watch's Response Opposing Entergy's Motion for Summary Disposition of Pilgrim Watch's Contention 3 in June 2007.
You also noted that the Sixth Disclosure was not accompanied by a sworn affidavit; and requested that we provide such a certification. Pilgrim Watch notes that this had not been the prior practice.
However, Pilgrim Watch has complied in the concluding paragraph of the attached Supplement to the Sixth Disclosure Statement by Pilgrim Watch.
Respectfully submitted, Mary Lampert Pilgrim Watch, pro se 148 Washington Street Duxbury, MA 02332 CC: Server List 2
pillsburq Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP 2300 N Street, NW I Washington, DC 20037-1122 I tel 202.663.8000 I fax 202.663.8007 June 10, 2010 Paul A. Gaukler Phone: 202.663.8304 paul.gaulder@piUsburylaw.com BY FEDERAL EXPRESS Ms. Mary Lampert 148 Washington Street Duxbury, MA 02332
Dear Ms. Lampert:
Thank you for your Sixth Supplemental Disclosure which we received Monday. We note, however, that your disclosure did not identify any experts or other persons upon whom Pilgrim Watch may rely as witnesses at hearing. At the May 4 telephone conference with the Board, you identified several persons that Pilgrim Watch intends to use as witnesses at the hearing. The Commission's disclosure regulation, 10 CFR § 2.3 36(a)(1), requires a party to identify "any person, including any expert, upon whose opinion the party bases its claims and contentions andmay rely upon as a witness, and a copy of the analysis or other authority upon which that person bases his or her opinion." In view of this requirement and your representations to the Board, we would have expected your Sixth Supplemental Disclosure Statement to provide the identity and the related information for the witnesses you identified to the Board in the May 4 telephone conference. We look forward to receiving that information.
Also, we note that your disclosure was not accompanied by a sworn affidavit, as required by 10 CFR § 2.33 6(c), that "all relevant materials... have been disclosed, and that the disclosures are accurate and complete." We request that you provide such a certification as required by the Commission's rules.
Sincerely, Paul Gaukler Counsel for Entergy cc:
Service List
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD In the Matter of Docket # 50-293-LR Entergy Corporation Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station License Renewal Application June 13, 2010 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that Supplement To Sixth Disclosure Statement by Pilgrim Watch and Letter to Paul Gaukler, Counsel for Entergy, was served June 13, 2010 in the above captioned proceeding to the following persons by electronic mail this date, followed by deposit of paper copies in the U.S. mail, first class.
Secretary of the Commission Attn: Rulemakings and Adjudications Staff Mail Stop 0-16 C1 United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission [2 copies]
Administrative Judge Ann Marshall Young, Chair Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Mail Stop - T-3 F23 US NRC Washington, DC 20555-0001 Administrative Judge Paul B. Abramson Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Mail Stop T-3 F23 US NRC Washington, DC 20555-0001 Administrative Judge Richard F. Cole Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Mail Stop -T-3-F23 US NRC Washington, DC 20555-0001 Office of Commission Appellate Adjudication Mail Stop 0-16 C I United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Mail Stop T-3 F23 United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of Commission Appellate Adjudication Mail Stop: 0-16C1 Washington, DC 20555-0001 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of General Counsel Mail Stop: 0-15 D21 Washington DC 20555-0001 Susan L. Uttal, Esq.
Marcia Simon, Esq.
Andrea Jones, Esq.
David Roth, Esq.
Brian Harris, Esq.
Michael Dreher, Esq.
Brian Newell, Paralegal U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Mail Stop: 01 -Fl Washington, DC 20555-0001 Lisa Regner, Project Mgr. Plant Lic.
Branch 1-1, Operator Reactor Licensing Washington, DC 20555-0001 Paul A. Gaukler, Esq.
David R. Lewis, Esq.
Jason B. Parker, Esq.
Pillsbury, Winthrop, Shaw, Pittman, LLP - 2300 N Street, N.W.
Washington, DC 20037-1128 Katherine Tucker ASLB, Law Clerk U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mail Stop T-3-E2a Washington, DC 20555-0001 Martha Coakley, Attorney General Matthew Brock, Assistant Attorney General Commonwealth of Massachusetts Office of Attorney General One Ashburton Place Boston, MA 02108 Mark Stankiewicz Town Manager, Town of Plymouth II Lincoln Street Plymouth MA 02360 Sheila Slocum Hollis, Esq.
Town of Plymouth MA Duane Morris, LLP 505 9th Street, N.W. 1000 Washington D.C. 20004-2166 Richard R. MacDonald Town Manager, Town of Duxbury 878 Tremont Street Duxbury, MA 02332 Fire Chief & Director DEMA, Town of Duxbury 688 Tremont Street P.O. Box 2824 Duxbury, MA 02331 Terence A. Burke, Esq.
Entergy Nuclear Mail Stop M-ECH-62 Jackson, MS 39213 Mary Lampert Pilgrim Watch, pro se 148 Washington St.,
Duxbury, MA 023332 June 13, 2010 2