NL-13-1236, SNCV061-RPT-02, Ver. 2.0, Vogtle Unit 2 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic. Part 8 of 14

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
SNCV061-RPT-02, Ver. 2.0, Vogtle Unit 2 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic. Part 8 of 14
ML13211A242
Person / Time
Site: Vogtle Southern Nuclear icon.png
Issue date: 07/25/2013
From:
Southern Co, Southern Nuclear Operating Co
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NL-13-1236 SNCV061-RPT-02, Ver 2.0
Download: ML13211A242 (65)
v • d • e


Text

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status:0i N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Z.- y- 000 Equip. Class 12,(Equipment Description S61 PISY4S~RtI fO ,i(V cow,1eou.a.£t Location:

Bldg. AX- Floor El. 7.-57'4 ý Room, Area g Z--L e od .ot- bt ron.Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y Nq of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YNNO UEO N/AE YV NO UE N/A-YIV NO U- N/AF-YE NE UC N/A4 Y.-' NO U-I 12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix 1: Classes of Equipment.

-< C-3 >, PAGE 361 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)EquipmentIDNo.

Z1f -3000 Equip.CIass 1 2 /I( -

tfc Equipment Description

<( I PWfSWuI f0 jVt/ &owgoL,.Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Y NO U" N/ADI 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y NEI UD N/A-]and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?N[-] UDI N/AD]Y4. NEI UD]Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y .NDI UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

LT-h \ "-- /Evaluated by: --e.~.II ..4 .Date: -" :'t:.( C-4 >PAGE 362 of 433 3 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 PAGE 363 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet I of 2 Status: ( N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)EquipmentID No. -T'tC- t Equip. Class" 2 '.", -5',7 i"'Equipment Description o',- A/C- k --/C , Location:

Bldg. -Floor El. 2 "' Room, Area R32 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

.) ,-,.-Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchora2e 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO] N%2 of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

Yt NE] UE] N/A"]3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YX NE] UE] N/AE-oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Y1NE] UE] N/AE]YrE] NE] UE] N/A YV NE] UE]2 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

< C-3>PAGE 364 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2 -'c. C' Equip. Class" 2 I -c Equipment Description C-C8 u"r2b _- Ale_ A7 _ C, LZ.-1 , Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yd NEI UEr N/AE]8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y0 NOl U-] N/Al]and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? 'cc" 5 14).t ..a'C.. ,. .' (f. ---- , " .-9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yg No] U-] N/A[]YgND Ul]Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y NE] UE-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) i L.JC'e~ylj~i~iiii~ice~(/

~ ~-Date: Evaluated by:.I '4f-4::H / , I ý'.. ; -1. -F-14,--ZjC,,Z

ý'IIIV12-6

/ Zý< C-4 )PAGE 365 of 433 9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSIOA PAGE 366 of 433 ATCHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSIO*PAGE 367 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. ,2'T L5 -Q2303 Equip. Class" 2!if (innso 4'ut et1Q)Equipment Description

(-..- (3U4Q( .ýe-,qv Fma Cot4f le(I Location:

Bldg. C.Dnirod FloorEl. 2*0-0V Room, Area B10 bS, -z 931a Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

YK NEI 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

..1774tV. -,,: r 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Y, NEI UD N/AE1 YS NEI UEF N/AEl Y1 NE- U-D N/An YKNE- UE1 N/AE-Y19 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

< C-3>PAGE 368 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2--TIS .303 Equip. Class'2 L1 (Ijr ts)Equipment Description

(.5c(,K cr;Ikr 9i. Vej" n (ofi'el Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Y NO U- N/AD 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y NEI U- N/Al and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

V 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?X ND UD N/AD YA N- UR'Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could NDI UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) tJC cL-'E Evaluated by:-/ ; = L'5 " -==I Date:1.< C-4 >PAGE 369 of 433 A ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSIONI 200 2-TIS-12303 CR "VAC.ESF IL IER ROOM TRAIN A TEMP SWI rCH A .PAGE 370 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet I of 2 Status:(5 N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)EquipmentIDNo.

,2- T-' ,422.5"0 Equip. Class.1 2 '9L T i rNlWf Equipment Description D IQSd eowtr Tuml I Friko A- P 5A c(Oh1o1r Location:

Bldg. "ltL3 2r Floor El. Room, Area e Dlten( 8 .tJ9- 0411 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommende

_Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

YOQý2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Y4 NEI UE- N/A-Y<NO U- N/ACl'ý' NEI U- N/AC YO NO U' N/AY YI NEI UC v Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipmcnt.

< C-3 >PAGE 371 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2- TIS 2"150 1 Equip. Class" 19 ,ref~ 1-r'oi-r)Equipment Description iO( T9V unlrd 16A ft 6n (m 4 rollf.r Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YY NO U- N/AD NW ND UD N/A" Y1 ND UD N/ADNO UD Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y~o NDI UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Date: z.O"Lt.<C-4 >PAGE 372 of 433 9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION .0 PAGE 373 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status: (D N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2- "ISH -21$! Equip. Class 1 2 1 R4" SelsorS)Equipment Description Ns(.W "-Ow"r Wý ", rd -T-rodn A -Fi (onfrolter Location:

Bldg. Tt 4T5A Floor El. 01 Room, Area 2(NSCW 1'otgf Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and fmdings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?.- 4 *=.,.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage frec of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Y0NEI U- N/A" Yq NO UE N/AE Yý NEI U- N/AE YE NE UE N/AýYNEI U-12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

PAGE 374 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipm ent ID N o. -T iS -2 25 16 Equip. Classu [2 ( " Al W Jf t 5t no .Equipment Description To4" i(- C41 TenIAr I --rra. -Fan C.onI-lk.Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

1[ ND UC N/AD 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, NO UCI N/AC and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yý NC UC" N/AC Y N[3 UC Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y NCI UC adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Vvaluatedb j L Z-j" Date: _ _ C__' Z--/.< C-A >-PAGE 375 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 9 NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 PAGE 376 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status:J)

N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. -- 7V -1615,( Equip. Class" 2 T- ' t -O/2.Je. ,', c' i t~-e, / 1.]Equipment Description

/0.. fI rf: fis'WJ"7z,¶j 5 af$ vs L: C, Location:

Bldg. tof'i-9i-Floor El. Room, Area 3,9 5-Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YEI NX/of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?7- 1L, -5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YE- NE U" N/AJR.j YE-" NEI UE NýiA YE NO U- N/AýYE- NEI UE v". NEI UE"2 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B' Classes of Equipment.

PAGE 377 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 1. TI/- /,',7- Equip. Class" 2 T.4, 5 Equipment Description 5 t, " TW -IS A 6/,,t t 4 ,,,eoe V4- t Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

YV NC3 Ur- N/A-]8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, NE UO N/Al]and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

X 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y NO- Ul N/Al Y'k NI-- ur-1 Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Vd .NEI Ul--adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

PAGE 378 of 433 9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSIOP PAGE 379 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment IDNo. V Equip. Class Equipment Description A, 0 J ,'& f- T- Frc, 6/Sheet 1 of 2 Status:QN U Location:

Bldg. PGC Floor El. 22' Room, Area P-103 1 Neox PA i V, C.a _t jIO'uYO Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgrnents and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

YEI X 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YJ NEI UED N/AE1 Y/'NE] UE1 N/AE]YýN$EI UE3 N/AE]Y[-] NE) UD N/AIp-2-Yf5J NEI UED 2 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

<* C-3 >PAGE 380 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. :2 T V -D-O 0 5- Equip. Class" 2 C otk)r)Equipment Description P 6- 5 0 J-54 A,( rr-44e. -T B"ti B Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YP NO UC N/AE1 YW ND UC- N/AC Y4!NC- UO N/AC YA//NC UC Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Yt2/N"] UC-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

/VY6aVý6 Evaluated by: I'LAIL , o ,/ 2ýc- C Date: PD, PAGE 381 of 433 A ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSIONS 2.0 PAGE 382 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status:fV N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)EquipmentlDNo.

7_-Z4-U (f Equip. Class" 1",peA,,e, 5 rcL iie -C5ae; [/Eauinment Descriivtion 6e2,J0Jtr~FOse Ti.A//67r~

Location:

Bldg. 01- Floor El. Z(o'-,-9' Room, Area .30 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) 1 ,b,,, Ce.qtL,/S Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO N[C l of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Yb'N- UE- N/AC YX NC UC N/AC YýA NC U- N/AC YC NC UC N/Ag 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

N 12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

< PAGE 383 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)EquipmentIDNo.

Z-TY -I/K7r' Equip. Class'2 712 c e..,, s, C/r., /'f Equipment Description Fr01Z T-V -11(7ýInteraction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y$.,N[- UC- N/ACl YqN[C UC N/AC1 SNCI UC- N/A[C NEI U--Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YX NC- UC1 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Tl.-l-5 CO?-)A -< RWC F'\Nwte I--h /jPII D ate _ ___ __ __Evaluated hv:/ LjJ 1&J~j 1 j Date: PAGE 384 of 433 3 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 PAGE 385 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status: C N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)EquipmentIDNo.

2-120.l-2(,-00 Equip. Class1 2 4*f1,&4W PU¶-(lASS (Equipment Description (Cn fwttmeta" Sfiaiy Pumnp +Location:

Bldg. /i't'c. FloorEl. IIV-3" Room, Area R,90.-'Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

G-ou !A, fui/p, Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Ykr NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

2)((, A190o2-Nooto J Vr. 10.0, 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YC' NEI U- N/A[l Y"NE' UD- N/ADUD" N/AD]Y('N" UD' N/AD YV NF' UD" 52 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

-( C-3 >PAGE 386 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)EquipmentlDNo.

Z-/zL6-Pg-oo Equip. Class 2 2 /-, , ,r -c1/4= S Equipment Description

--" '4-'Jr SAM,/ -/t , Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Y9NIEI U" N/AU 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, N[:" U[] N/A[and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y9 NEI U- N/AU YXNO UO Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y NEI U-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Na o CO¶ vr4d, Evaluated by: M. W 1 4k'V Date: ///< C-4 >-PAGE 387 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 PAGE 388 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 I IN.13*re I 08 29 2012 PAGE 389 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS N NO. SNCV061-RPT-02,VESO2.

I '-ý --&Z PAGE 390 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status@ N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2 3%c2 4 00 Equip. Class 1 2 , Equipment Description

',.LS LS O-' TaxO- J".- -- "3/4j ? , Location:

Bldg. v-- e FloorEl. ZISL'o" Room, Area fO(, Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

' o- - Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchora~e 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YIZNU" UrFI N/AU YeNO- U[ N/A]U-- N/A-Yý NO UO N/AO Y NO UU 12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

< C.3 >PAGE 391 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2.t Zot-cýC\ Equip. Class 1 2 " Equipment Description ,UO LI- c L- ,j,-rr--"-

-" ,_- w .c5 -Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YV/NE-] UI N/AD YZEN"I U N/AD Y N] UEI N/A0 YO/N[] U-Other Adverse Conditions

/11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y NF' U-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: "<._.'" <-f-/J k- c.Date:.4. rO ZzP L 8 Z/ Y Z/z J PAGE 392 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 It,'d Il:%7 7.I i PAGE 393 of 433 I N~O. S4CVO6i-RPT02

\JEPRSION20 0 is-TS ATT ,VMEt4,T 3: SOSMIC WP'LKDO'nN CVAECKL TU 7 I',, AMMOL I pGS -394 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status:& N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Z- 'Ssl 05 -cco Equip. Class 1 2 qi Equipment Description c(5czI ihm VMtr.Location:

Bldg. ¢-:'- Floor El. 2Cý0' Room, Area %73 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YID of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

NO U- N/A-NEI UE" N/AO YOI- NO U- NiAg Y-O NEI U- N/A" YV. NO U[I' Enter the equipmenl class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

< C-3>PAGE 395 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID) No. ?-I53--- -CX Equip. Class': Equipment Description Ct-r-m Q -.. .,r.2 c9 Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Xý NEI Ur N/Af 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, N!" UD N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yý NEI UO N/AD 1ýNO UE Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y' NO UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

/" Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: --I C-A,i Date: '- "< C-4 >" PAGE 396 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS S O NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 PAGE 397 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Status') N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2 -/JTWZ-04 7-"tý7 Equip. Class. /'Equipment Description

-/2/, Pi'.A/ 'Vi- 4, 4-ý /J'a- "llere Location:

Bldg. 4aA. Floor El. /2__--_ Room, Area 1, //Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

AA-/fFRC4H 41R rAriq eV,-fAJ" Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoraze 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YX NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

b 5ýJjI -, C'cej.'it-rse

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

2-X+ A Jc-2. L VA- ?/0 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Y4 NO3 U- N/AO-YXJ NO UO N/AO YR NO UO- N/A-YD NOI UO- N/AO YW NEI U[12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

< C-3 )>PAGE 398 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)EquipmentD No. !-/.ý-,7-Equip. Class" Equipment Description 12# " ,..-omA t /er"A-Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YJ NC UC N/A-Y; NC UC NIAC Y t NC UC N/AC Y[X NEI U-Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y)9 NCI UC adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

I'yoYVF Evaluated by: zi7-r 5--z / T"4 /4-Date:/1 9 iz<C-4 >PAGE 399 of 433 3 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 PAGE 400 of 433 A ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Oo a PAGE 401 of 433 A ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 PAGE 402 of 433 A ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 IN\PAGE 403 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status:()

N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. -O'-z.e,0 Equip. Class"' 9 FAAN Equipment Description rC , C % j p ..-1 \J C, .Location:

Bldg. , Floor El. Room, Area 03 " k Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Vx NC of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Afo"vrCtO 70 MW ClrL4c. cw-5 727zI. WAAI(F_5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

PflWpX-!f-7,AqA 1-11 -224 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YANC UC N/ACUC N/AC YC NCI UC N/AX YA NEI UC N/AC YA NC UC Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.( C-3 >PAGE 404 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2-531 C3"7- or.-c~ o Equip. Class'2 -FAA-7 Equipment Description

-6cz .-c .\'trF--T-i, Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Y, NEI UD N/AD 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, No U[D N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y/I ND3 UD3 N/AD Y/kND U-]Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YA NDI UI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) itjoVF t00t S -0* 37 L. C -Evaluated by: A /[Jj'.$ / ,-Date: 0 /0 q /l10 /2-ct.~. L< C-4 >ýPAGE 405 of 433 A ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 PAGE 406 of 433 A ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 PAGE 407 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 I PAGE 408 of 433 A ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 PAGE 409 of 433

'TRACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 PAGE 410 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status:(@

N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)EquipmentlDNo.

Equip. Class, 2 (I McC5'Equipment Description 4-70 V MCC .-2BBF Location:

Bldg. P-&B Floor El. 22-0' Room, Area P4.01 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YD( NI]of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the an h rage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?OU La~k"& VI~ 1~1;~~~s~5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Z 3A(0o3 -0234 +, VCR-4 .0 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YD(NIE] UEJ N/AD Yt NEI UD N/AO Y ND U N/A(Y NEI UI] N/A-YI NiO UO 12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

< C-3 >PAGE 411 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 21I Equip. Class--Equipment Description N8P V MU. -89F I(,ccs)Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yk'Nr UOI N/ADUD N/AINEI U- N/A-Yýý'NO Urn Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Yo NEI Ur-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

NONC.Evaluated by: M0 1 144' 4;(ikson -04ý PVl/O ooWi$Date: 13 9 120Z< C-4 PAGE 412 of 433 A ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 PAGE 413 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 I PAGE 414 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 0 NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 I DIESEL GENERATOR 2B GENERATOR CONTROL PANEL 2-2 403-P5-DG3 PAGE 415 of 433 a N 0 NO. SNCVO61-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS PAGE 416 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)EquipmentIDNo.

Equip. Class'2 7.- .'-X C Equipment Description

." -Z.-- 'Location:

Bldg. F'A(.$ FloorEl. t'5'-o" Room,Area R, VC Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

_3 '>k otr c. -r-w .)Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorae 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

YU4/NO 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

f"iM AV" 0c2j ,1A0 o32. ,,"J -oo fv 2-z 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Y9NO UD N/AD YIL NDJ U- N/AD YjX NEI UD N/AD NY D U N/AD YXNDI U[D Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

<C-3 >PAGE 417 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2' ta'4 O Equip. Classu__Zt

-Tr.L%,S AwO 4eAT rIV1,C*-W6G Equipment Description b ? ,' r Lx , t" .Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yý' NEI UE' N/AD YNE U" N/AD Yg NEI U- N/AD YX NEI UM Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Yg NO UM adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

W, otop Evaluated by: ) CPr4 / '0v' r> (3V Date: 8 21- Zo tZ 0 !-A/ oz<C-4 >PAGE 418 of 433 A ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 PAGE 419 of 433 A ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 PAGE 420 of 433 A ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 PAGE 421 of 433 NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS Sheet 1 of 2 Status:6 N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)EquipmentIDNo.

Z- 213 PC -OOZ Equip. Class 2 lihOA'/A-ON7,'" PAZ.IM -e'z4 5 " Equipment Description 5/" ' ,'Mp A Location:

Bldg. A IX"- Floor El. ____" Room, Area ,491 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YX NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

4hX ZD080°70 05R, /6-0.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Y$1 NO UC' N/AC Yj NO UC N/Ar YX NO UC N/AC YN NO Ur] N/AC Yý NO UE 2 Entcr the equipmcn!

class name fromn Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

<C-3 >PAGE 422 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2-1/Z3 '/'" 002 Equip. Class" PO1P - Equipment Description SFP //'/*41rP Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

V~ NO UC N/A]8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YK NEI UC N/AO and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y[ANO U- N/ACý NCO UC Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Yo NC UC adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: /Z -'/j/ c 1D late: Y+/-'?//7 ,0,4 f0 jVOL G0e)oQR-S5-

/ iam-'A&~-4 C-l >-PAGE 423 of 433 A ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 PAGE 424 of 433 A ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 I PAGE 425 of 433

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=NL-13-1236,_SNCV061-RPT-02,_Ver._2.0,_Vogtle_Unit_2_Seismic_Walkdown_Report_for_Resolution_of_Fukushima_Near-Term_Task_Force_Recommendation_2.3:_Seismic._Part_8_of_14&oldid=892167"